BIOCHEMICAL
Vol. 41, No. 3, 1970
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
125 I -INSULIN BINDING OF AN c I MEMBRANE FRACTION FROM RAT LIVER
PLASMA
CHARACTERIZATION
P.D.R.
House
and M.J.
Weidemann
Department of Biochemistry, School of General Studies, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia. Received September 18, 1970 Summary A procedure for the isolation of three different plasma membrane fractions from rat liver is described. The heavy subfraction (PLl) has a high specific activity in alkaline while the lightest subfraction (PL3) contains a phosphatase, high specific activity in 5' -Nucleotidase, ATPase and phosphodiesterase. The major part of the plasma membrane recovered is found in PL3. A specific binding of p254 -Insulin is shown to occur in PL3, with a ten-fold enhancement over that of any other plasma membrane fraction. The action at
least
one,
suggested
of if
that
results
in
The main
not the
in
the
it
has been
shown that
is
not
the
Any attempted a careful
membrane
fragments.
basis
an enzymatic
capacity
hepatic
three
the
effect
of
the
the
membrane
membrane
are possibly (2,3).
level
of cyclic
insulin
receptor
However,
fractions
transport
site(s) the
tried,
membrane with
about
AMP (4).
of
work we have
(1).
and
brought
on glucose
parameters
541
has been
gluconeogenesis
of plasma
membrane
requires
plasma
of the
of insulin
present
membrane
different
the
characterization
analysis
It
AMP levels
intracellular
In
with
structure
cell
cyclic
preliminary
recognizable in
the
insulin
the
surface
sites.
on glycolysis,
analysis
requires
correlate
in
membrane
receptor
of
intracellular
to
plasma
specific
change
by lowering
of
two,
of insulin
metabolism
related
at the
interaction
a physical
effects
protein
insulin
various on the
fragments, insulin
from
rat
binding liver.
to
Vol. 41, No. 3,197O
BIOCHEMICAL
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
Methods Rat of
the
Male
liver
plasma
methods rats
removed
of Coleman
(200-250g) after
clearance minced
were
pH 7.4 liver
after
pellet
material
of the
following
loml;
homogenate once
was loaded
after
90 mins
onto
(Spinco
washed
and centrifuged
10 mins.
A second
discontinuous
until
out
and the
sucrose
and 5mM to
10 mins
at
for
10 mins,
and the
sucrose
gradients
in
and the
Medium
gradient
collected
1.195-5ml;
1.184-
were centrifuged
SW 25.2)
at
fractions
H at
were
10,OOOxg
similar
fractions
and
The combined
1.21-5ml; These
35Oxg,
for
to the
were
stored
first at -2OOC
assayed. The supernatants
fuged
for
10 mins
mitochondrial 75,000xg layered 5ml;
the
was adjusted
discontinuous
1.30-5ml;
collected,
was carried
for
1,500xg
and 1.157-1Oml.
RPM for
livers
to hand-homogenize in 0.25M
(6).
(radial
rehomogenization.
at
densities:
1.171-10ml
25,000
and the
homogenizer
was spun
were centrifuged
pellet
18 hours
The homogenate
H).
and Kamat
filtration.
was washed
supernatants
for
was used
(Medium
by a modification
(5) and Wallach
up and down strokes)
The filtered the
al
starved
in)
(7-8
were prepared
A Teflon-glass
0.005-0.007
Tris-HCl,
et
stunning.
livers
lOml/g
membranes
lO,OOOxg,
from
1 hour.
The pellet
onto
a Ficoll
gradient
and the
1,500xg pellet
of the
following
SW 25.1)
in Medium
were
the at
medium
H and
densities: were
and the
H and stored
centri-
was designated
up into
The gradients
(Spinco
90 mins.
spin
was centrifuged
was taken
and 1.036-10ml.
were washed
the
The supernatant
for
RPM for
fractions
at
fraction.
1.055-1Oml
25,000
obtained
1.104-
spun at
collected
at -2OOC.
Results In
the
three
plasma
membrane 542
fractions
(Table
1)
(PL1-1.18
Vol. 41, No. 3,197O
BIOCHEMICAL
AND BIOPHYSKAL
RESEARCH COMMUNlCATlONS
TABLE I Enzyme
Activities
of Plasma Subcellular
Membrane Fractions Fractions.
and Other
Homog.
pL1
pL2
pL3
-SER
RER -
Mito --
Sol.
1.48
1.79
11.8
32.6
6.0
1.6
--
--
AlkalinePase (6)
0.07
1.46
0.46
0.15
0.06
0.06
--
--
PDase
0.07
0.18
0.22
0.31
0.15
--
--
0.07
1.64
2.15
14.1
14.5
1.56
1.15
--
--
2.26
3.10
0.91
0
--
--
20.7
--
2.95
0.16
0.76
0.34
--
11.7
--
--
0.60
0.39
2.61
Enzyme 5' -Nase
(6)
(6)
(Na+ + K+)Mg2+ ATPase (3)
SDH (3) G-6-Pase yield
(3) of pro-
189
Results are expressed in Umoles product per mg protein per hour. All results in each fraction agree to within 20% in all cases. Figures in parenthesis represent the number of preparations. The specific activities are an average of the total number of preparations. Homog. - Homogenate; PL - Plasma membrane; SER - Smooth endoplasmic reticulum; RER - Rough endoplasmic reticulum; Mito. - Mitochondria and Sol. - Soluble fraction. The following enzyme assays were used: 5' -Nucleotidase (5' -Nase) (13); Alkaline phosphatase (Alkaline-Pase) (14); Phosphodiesterase (PDase) (14); ATPase (15); Succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) (16) and Glucose6-Phosphatase (G-6-Pase) (17). Liberated Pi was determined by the method of Ames (18), protein by the method of Lowry et al (19).
sucrose density),
density:
PL2-1.17 PDase
5' -Nase,
sucrose
and ATPase
activity
in PL3 and to a lesser
relative
specific
activity
extent,
Ficoll
found
specific
homogenate.
20 when compared
with
more
than
30% of
5'
the -Nase
543
at high
in PL2.
5'
than
total
were
and PL3-1.036
(RSA) of
more
the
density
-Nase
activity
In
fact,
activity
in
This found
in
the PL3 was
represents the
homogen-
Vol. 41, No. 3, 1970
ate.
Fraction
enzymes
mined
BIOCHEMICAL
but
PLl
contained
did
appear
Contamination
of
from
the
(G-6-Pase)
15% mitochondria, contamination
brane
contamination,
On this
that
microsomal
Preliminary
the
of
active
in Alkaline-Pase
membrane
basis than
PL 2'
PLl
the
above
fractions
2.9% in
SER fraction
mentioned (RSA = 22.4).
was deter-
(SDH) and microsomal contained
approximately
5% and PL3 had none.
as evidenced
Microsomal
PL3 and 1.4% in PLl. contained
more
by 5' -Nase
activity,
It
plasma
mem-
than
PL3
contamination. experiments
1
Figure
plasma
little
of mitochondrial
was 6.5% in
be noted
contained
the
PL2 less
should
very
to be very
activities
enzymes.
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
aimed
2 3 ng insulin/
at determining
4 mg protein
5
insulin
binding
6
1.
The Insulin binding is expressed as cpm/mg protein. Insulin binding preparations were kept at -200C for 1 week. was determined with a 50~1 aliquot of each fraction in the presence of 0.5ml Krebs-Ringer phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, P251]-insulin (50-loopc/vg incubated at 370C for 10 mins. insulin) was used and the reaction was stopped with 0.5ml The tubes were centrifuged for 5 mins ice-cold 10% TCA. and the free insulin was extracted with acidic n-butanol. The pellet was homogenized and suspended in 15ml scintillLess than 8% of the p253-insulin used ation cocktail. was soluble in 5% TCA and this is accounted for in the results. 544
BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
VoL.41, No. 3, 1970
parameters to bind
have
shown that
fraction
insulin
than fraction 125 of c II -insulin*bound
the
amount
the
various
than
the
also
increased
brane
fraction, It
membrane
the
was observed for
binding
occurs
SH-group the
in
that This
less at
than
to observe
the
been
at O'C,
binding
that
protein
of the
plasma
(not
shown).
was resistant
has also
is time
a maximal
to
noted from
allowed
mem-
freezing
that
maximal
which
completed
among
greater
binding/mg
content/mg
2.5 mins
37OC the
indicated
was sufficient
It
in
as lo-fold
20-fold
density
binding
capacity
The difference
than
of insulin in the
up to one week.
be expected quickly.
that
1).
and more
a decrease
as did
(Fig.
can be as great
The amount
with
(-20°C)
PL2,
fractions
homogenate.
PL3 has a much higher
it
might
even more for
the
binding
studies
response.
Discussion The results of at least enzymatic tained
show that
three
pointed
out
that
this
By the have
isolated
1.16-1.19 *
(125
it
membrane
genization,
have
light
plasma
Amersham.
and 1.18
(Lot
77)
fragmented
three
(9).
of this
from
be by
density
of
the
1.17). of
initial these
the homo-
fractions.
investigators
densities
compound
and TCA precipitation. 545
for
several
In none
ob-
must
subfractions
origin
with
and
subfractions
a single
methods
fractions
it
(sucrose
following
was purchased
The purity
chromatography
the
differing
membrane
and heavy
composed
results
though
fraction
shown that
a less
use of widely
I - Insulin
Sephadex
his
is
densities similar
technique,
been obtained
suggesting
membrane
(7) has presented
he obtained
has been
plasma
of different
centrifugation
(8) and 1.16
Center,
liver
of an intermediate
paper
plasma
rat
fractions
Evans
a zonal
rehomogenization In
membrane
activities. with
the
these
of 1.13 cases
(5), have
Radiochemical was checked
by
Vol. 41, No. 3, 1970
Table -rat
BIOCHEMICAL
1.
-The effect
adipose
tissue
were
carried
of age on carboxylation mitochondria.
The reaction
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
mixture
out at 37"
Source
in Figure
1.
Incubations
30 minutes.
Pyruvate
Age
-
carboxylation
-mumoles
Human
of this
boxylation lation
39
54 years
37
6 weeks
1798
6 weeks
1895
10 weeks
350
14 weeks
238
a possible
age of the rat. adipose
effect
was investigated. of pyruvate
tissue
to the aging of pyruvate
markedly
A similar older
phenomenon
of aging
on adipose
As seen in Table
decreases
from
Hl4CO5 fixed/mg
22 years
Rat
view
by human and
-
was as described for
of pyruvate
magnitude animals observed
by human adipose
in adipose
in rat
tissue
mitochondria
with
(14).
tissue (Table
car-
carboxyincreasing
in lipogenesis
observed
adipose
pyruvate
1 mitochondrial
of reduction has been
tissue
tissue
protein
in rat
In contrast
the carboxylation 1) is
not
affected
by age. Acknowledgement: I wish to express my sincerest appreciation to Dr. R.W. -Hanson of Fels Research Institute for his support, encouragement and help in all aspects of this work. I would like to thank Dr. V.H. Auerbach and Dr. A.M. DiGeorge of St. Christopher's Hospital for Children for their support; and Dr. L.I. Goldman and Dr. O.E. Gwen of Temple University School of Medicine for supplying human tissues. This work was supported in part by Grants AM011279, CA-10916, HD-2870, RR-5624 and an institutional grant IN-88 from the American Cancer Society.
553
BIOCHEMICAL
Vol. 41, No. 3, 1970
spite
of
the
transport
readily
demonstrable
adipose
and muscle
is possibly
one of
in
metabolism
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
effect
of
tissue, the
insulin
its
on glucose
effect
most
important
suggest
that
on hepatic aspects
of
its
action. These light
observations
subfraction
the
parenchymal
the
action
of
examination ization to reside hepatic fractions various
(PL3)
in
at
problem
least its
from
the
surface
hepatic
is being As this
positive to the
membrane
surface
out
has been
in of
in
liver
the
of for
A further
on the
morphological
resolution
of the
be appropriate
carried
identification
fractions
origin
metabolism.
enzyme
two different
the
sinusoidal
would
affecting
cyclase.
may lead plasma
This
insulin
of adenyl
tissue,
arises
cells.
of this
in
strongly
shown
sites the
source
local(12)
in
present of the
tissue.
References 1. Krahl, M-E., (1961). The Action of Insulin on Cells, Academic Press, New York. 2. Sutherland, E.W., and Robison, G.A., (1969). Diabetes, 18:797. 3. Jefferson, L.S., Exton, J.H., Butcher, R.W., Sutherland, E.W., and Park, C.R., (1968). J. Biol. Chem., 243:1031. 4. Craig, J.W., Rail, T.W., and Larner, J., (1969). Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 177:213. 5. Coleman, R., Michell, R.H., Finean, J.B., and Hawthorne, J.N., (1967). Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 135:573. 6. Wallach, D.F.H., and Kamet, V.B., (1964). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 52:721. 7. Evans, W.H., (1970). Biochem. J., 116:833. 8. Emmelot, P., Box, G.J., Benedetti, E.L., Rumke, P.H., (1964). Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 90:126. 9. Song, C.S., Rubin, W., Rifkine, A.B., and Kappas, A., (1969). J. Cell Biol., 41:124. 10. Graham, J.M., Higgins, J.A., Green, C., (1968). Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 150:303. 11. Mirsky, I.A., (1957). Recent Progs. Hormone Res., 13:429. 12. Reik, L., Petzold, G.L., Higgins, J.A., Greengard, P., and Barrnett, R.J., (1970). Science, 168:382. 13. Ray, T.K., (1970). Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 196:l. 14. Bosman, H.B., Hagopian, A., and Eylar, E.H., (1968). Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 128:51. 15. McKeel, D.W., and Jarett, L., (1970). J. Cell Biol., 44:417. 547
Vol. 41, No. 3,197O
BIOCHEMICAL
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
16. Veegar, C., Der Vartanian, D.V., Zeylamaker, W.P., (1969). Methods of Enzymology, Vol. XIII, p.83. 17. Harper, A.E., (1965). Methods of Enzymatic Analysis, H-U Bergmeyer (Ed)., Academic Press, N.Y. p.788. 18. Ames, B.N., (1966). Methods of Enzymology Vol. VIII, p.115 19. Lowry, O.H., Rosebrough, N.J., Farr, A.L., Randall, R.J., (1951). J. Biol. Chem., 193:265.
548