Chemosphere,Vol.12,No.4/5,~p Printed in Creat Britain
665-668,1983
OO45-6535/83/O50665 O4503.OO/O ©1983 Pergamon Press Ltd.
CHLORINATED COMPOUNDS IN EMISSIONS FROM MUNICIPAL INCINERATION
Ulla Samuelsson and Anne Lindskog Swedish Water and Air Pollution Research I~stitute P.O. Box 5207,S-40224 Gothenburg, Sweden
INTRODUCTION Three emission samples from a municipal incinerator have been analysed for neutral components. The plant was equipped with an inclined grate furnace followed bY3an afterburner. The furnace load was 2000 kg/h and the stack gas flow 30 000-35 000 m /h (stp). EXPERIMENTAL Sampl i ng p a r a m e t e r s :
Sample
I 2 3
Temp. in the flue gas °C = 200 ~200 =200
Temp.in the furnace °C
CO 2 %
820-900 700-800 680-780
5-6 6-7 5-6
SampleVolume m3(stp)d.g • I0 12 9
Sampling e q u i p m e n t : Glass f i b e r
filter
Condensate Amberlite
~::
(I) (2)
XAD-2
(I)
(3)
IIL,] 665
666
The f i l t e r s and the XAD-2 columns were Soxhlet e x t r a c t e d f o r 24 h w i t h dichloromethane and the condensate was e x t r a c t e d by shaking w i t h cyclohexane. The e x t r a c t was t r e a t e d w i t h 0.5 M NaOH-solution to remove the acids and w i t h I M H~SOA-solution to remove the bases. The remaining n e u t r a l f r a c t i o n was concentrated and th~ dTchloromethane was replaced by cyclohexane. A p o r t i o n of the concentrated f r a c t i o n was in some cases f u r t h e r f r a c t i o n a t e d on a s i l i c a column (5% w a t e r ) e l u t e d w i t h n-hexane, toluene and dichloromethane. The d i f f e rent f r a c t i o n s were analysed by GC and GC/MS. The GC:s used were Carlo Erba Fractovap w i t h a FID and a glass c a p i l l a r y column (SE-54) and Varian 3700 w i t h an ECD and a glass c a p i l l a r y column (SP 1000). The GC/MS was a Hewlett Packard 5992A w i t h a f l o p p y disc system, s p l i t l e s s i n j e c t i o n and a fused s i l i c a c a p i l l a r y column (SE-54), operated in both peakf i n d e r mode and s e l e c t e d ion m o n i t o r i n g mode. The exact c o n c e n t r a t i o n of i n d i v i d u a l components was concidered less i m p o r t a n t and the demand of a precise q u a n t i f y i n g was r e j e c t e d in f a v o r of the p o s s i b i l i t y to f a c i l i t a t e the i d e n t i f i c a t i o n by clean-up procedures. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS The amount and number of organic compounds were d i f f e r e n t in the three samples but the g r e a t e s t p a r t of the organic content was always found in the XAD-2 e x t r a c t f o l l o w e d by the condensate e x t r a c t . Only a minor p a r t was found in the p a r t i c l e e x t r a c t . To e s t i m a t e the t o t a l emission i t is thus necessary to analyse both the p a r t i c u l a t e phase and the vapor phase. Emission data:
Sample
pg/m3 (stp) d, 9. 10% CO2 I
2 3
Phenantrene
Hexach|orobenzenes p~/MJ
~/m 3 (stp) d.g. 10% CO2
pgl;,IJ
6
4
5
4
60 110
45 80
40 100
30 75
Q u a n t i t a t i v e l y the n e u t r a l f r a c t i o n dominates by a l i p h a t i c hydrocarbons and PAH. C h l o r i n a t e d compounds were found in a l l the samples wich i n d i c a t e s a general f o r m a t i o n . The amount was less than 10% and the d i f f e r e n t groups can q u a n t i t a t i v e l y be arranged in the f o l l o w i n g o r d e r : c h l o r l n a t e d benzenes > PCDF > PCN > PCDD > PCB.
Reconstruction of p e a k f i n d e r
ION 3 3 9 . 9
PCDF
FS
in sample 3
~ sO: ii : i! .' ;{ ! V'-!::
100
ION 3O5.9 FS
! 4
C1
50
ION 269.9
i 3 C1 - ~
JJ
ION 236.0
q
~:12 Cl
mi'.~ ,.
.,
M
='.~ :
,,. .
.
!.,i:.. ~'' ~ '*".._:
667
~oN 35<9
Reconstruction of peakfinder
Fs
PCDD in sample 3
: 5 cl
il i '%ii
I0
f I .;
i i[
ION 321.9
" ~.
,o
~i4 Cl
ION 285.9 FS
10 ............ ~: :'~
ION 252.0 FS 5 #,..,
Reconstruction of peakfinder
ION 459.7
PCDF + PCDD in sample 3
FS
it ~.
T','"
~ "~"
iV= "~ii' ! i v ' ' 8 Cl
!t
20
/. ~_..
ION ,423.8 OCDD seems to have a more s t a b l e c o n f i g u r a t i o n than OCDF
FS
,7CI R
20
ION 389.8 tl
FS
20
•
6 C1
~\ :,~,
ION 443.7 FS
8 C1
A
20
,'. ~-
ION 4})7.8 FS 75
17 Cl ;t,
ION 373.8
i 6ACI
FS
;\ : k;,
75
Selected ion monitoring, ion 305.9 TCDF and 2.3.7.8-TCDF
f~ tl
;',
',i,
,,,.
~r,
',i ~.~ ,in ,~
i':q il. i[!~,i!i i!!i r
~.,t
L, i i ~ f
b
,-i
The maximum amount of 2.3.7.8-TCDF in sample 3 is about 2 #g/m3 (stp)
66R
The GC-MS analyses a l s o i n d i c a t e the presence o f o t h e r c h l o r i n a t e d compounds. Some o f them have t e n t i t a t i v e l y been i d e n t i f i e d as c h l o r i n a t e d isomers of f l u o r e n o n e , benzonitrile and a l l y l b e n z e n e ( o r f u r a n e ? ) , a l l in a p p r o x i m a t e l y the same amount as PCDF, and p e n a n t r e n e / a n t h r a c e n e , much less than PCDF. Reconstruction of peakfinder, c h l o r i n a t e d f l u o r e n o n e in sample 3.
~5i Cl
ION 351.9
Z
£S
25
:' A
ION 317.9 FS
~ 4 Cl h
30
}]\!~'<< i:, TON 281.9 FS
,{ 3 C i ::
75
tl
zoN 248.o i2 ci~ FS
75
~:: :Ill i
~,~J,.i~% .:v . '.-..,.,~,._..,-,-,,...,..,,,~_,~.~ ~ _,~.~.,::.__. ~ , ' ~ : : .....:........ I Cl-fluorenone base peak 214
..............................................
~ ..................................................
50 i O~J 15~-J 2@LI 2 '-;(~ iigl#_I .::50 ...........................................................................................
4L18
4 Cl-benzonitrile base peak 241
ii 50
1 @O
ii 15E~
IL~ 200
25(I
-',~(~
:350
400
I
6 Cl-allylbenzene (or 6 Cl-furane?) base peak 324
iL
' It
iL
,,I,
,
5C~ i 0C I 150 200 25@ :300 1:5 ;11 .............................................................................................
40~
I Cl-phenantrene/ anthracene base peak 212
5~
i O@
150
2@i~
250
!:~IL1
ACKNO~,EEDGEMENTS This study was supported by a g r a n t from the Swedish N a t i o n a l Environment P r o t e c t i o n Board.
:350
4El ;1