Pharmacological Research Communications, Vol. 5, No. 4, 1973 CHOLINE
UPTAKE
IN N E U R O B L A S T O M A IONIC
R. Massarelli,
397 : INFLUENCE
CELL CULTURES
OF
ENVIRONMENT A. Ebel 1 and P. Handel
J. C i e s i e l s k i - T r e s k a ,
Centre de N e u r o c h i m i e du CNRS, and Institut de Chimie Facult6 de H6decine, 67085 Strasbourg Cedex, France
Biolozique
i~eceived 6 June 1973
SUMMARY The uptake mouse tion
of choline
neuroblastoma
strongly
cells
ions
also
Incubation inhibited
potassium
incorporation
a strict
relationship
and that
an active transport
The uptake
cells.
between
tissues
(Sung and Johnstone,
Adamic,
1972),
1969; banks,
Green 1968;
1Charg6e
cells
et al.,
1972)
Diamond
de R e c h e r c h e
on the uptake
by
of cho-
out that there
is
and sodium pump is involved
in
cells.
investigated Sanford
or s u b c e l l u l a r
au CNRS.
cesium
in both p r o l i f e r a -
uptake
and Martin,
and Milfay,
was
or at low t e m p e r a -
energy-dependent,
(Hodgkin
with
diffe-
of p o t a s s i u m
It is pointed
1965;
from
incorpora-
so called
substituted
of choline
has been
The
The uptake
ferricyanide
in n e u r o b l a s < o m a
of choline
ones.
effect
choline
component,
in the
Substitution
an inhibitory
with
the
ions were
sucrose.
ting and d i f f e r e n t i a t i n g
choline
was higher
if sodium
line derived
investigated.
in p r o l i f e r a t i n g
or with
sodium produced line.
choline
than
inhibited
or lithium
ture
tumor has been
of 14C labelled
rentiating
in a cloned cell
1972;
in several
and Smyth, 1965;
Martin,
components
Yamamura
1969; 1968,
(March-
and Snyder,
3~
Pharmaco/ogical Research Communications, Voi. 5, No. 4, 1973
1972; that
Whittaker,
1972;
a carrier mediated
nedy,
1969;
lability
of ions
Haga and Noda,
in the
1973)
It has been cholinergic
(Hanin et al., of a suitable of mouse
model.
Under
tion of the m e c h a n i s m
in vitro
Neuroblastoma ding
choline
cell
metabolism
general
metabolism
thesis.
In the first
simple
situation
the perspective
by which
cultures : choline
morphological difference
as well
concerning
tic e q u i p m e n t
neurotransmitters. gical
and b i o c h e m i c a l
from the
et al.,
drastically
(Seeds
consumption
is increased
an investiga-
neuroblastoma
considered
clones
present
concerns
and
; the main
of the enzymaof
the m o r p h o l o -
serum w i t h d r a w a l
morphology
et al., 1970)
syn-
various
and d e g r a d a t i o n
a p p e a r after
for
neosynthesis.
or the absence
(Nissen et al.,
only
the most
characteristics
1970; H e r m e t e t
regar-
for a c e t y l c h o l i n e
In fact c e l l u l a r
of a c e t y l c h o l i n e s t e r a s e
cultures
for the
is used by the cells
characteristic which
choice
two p o s s i b i l i t i e s
neuroblastoma
events
i n c u b a t i n g medium~
activities
offer
for the synthesis
Another
of the
started.
as b i o c h e m i c a l
necessary
model
of a c e t y l c h o l i n e
the p r e s e n c e
study
that cloned
enters
step of our work we
It is well known that
1968;
by the
of the neuron
or it is used as well
in the absence
avai-
difficulties
a useful
choline
has been
the
can be avoided
metabolism
and Ken-
phenomenon.
technical
can represent
neuroblastoma
cultivated
several
shown
on the
(Martin~
in the past that
out
some of which
1970)
study of the c h o l i n e r g i c
cells
in this
is involved
Diamond
dependent
surroundings
cellular
system presents
It has been
1968;
strictly
1972),
pointed
1973).
(Potter,
process
et al.,
Green
and Noda,
Haga
changes
1972)
as well
; the O as the
catechol-O-methyl-
2
Pharmacological Research Communications, VoL 5, No, 4, 1873 transferase sidered 1970).
et
(Blume
as r e v e a l i n g The terms
in the context
a~.,
1970).
a cellular
with or without
fetal
phenomena
differentiation
proliferation
as i n d i c a t i n g
These
399 have been
#Seeds et aZ.,
and d i f f e r e n t i a t i o n
cultures
con-
will be used
which have been
incubated
calf serum r e s p e c t i v e l y .
METHODS. Clone N 18 which has been remarkable
acetylcholinesterase
vity and a barely (Amano et al., of clone
Falcon Eagle
1972).
N 18
tissue medium
atmosphere growth.
detectable
but no choline
findings
inactive
(Gibco,
flasks USA)
at
stage the
the flask and form a u n i f o r m
(6 cm ~) c o n t a i n i n g
zed. dium.
Krebs-Ringer Each
Petri
of 14C methyl Amersham, cubation
England)
was
chloride
The dishes
2 ml c o n c e n t r a t e d
were
formic
phase
Petri dishes
the cells were
activity
was d e t e c t a b l e
then dried After
utilime-
and 0.5
three
times
in-
with
in the third
and the cells checking
~Ci
60 mCi/mmole;
37oC. At the end of the
were r a p i d l y w a s h e d
acid.
as soon as
5 ml of the m e d i u m
at
of
surface.
used as i n c u b a t i n g
(specific
incubated
the Petri dishes
% Air
to the b o t t o m of
m e d i u m and,
again,
in
modified
a 5 % C02-95
Falcon
pH 7.2 was
NaCI 0.14 M. No r a d i o a c t i v i t y washing.
into
dish c o n t a i n i n g
choline
been c u l t i v a t e d
layer on all the plastic
was a t t a i n e d
phosphate
has
are a t t a c h e d
5 ml of D u l b e c c o
phase
activity
up to the s t a t i o n a r y
The cells were then t r a n s f e r r e d
acti-
ones.
37°C under
cells
a
classification
(75 cm 2) in Dulbecco
100 % humidity,
At this
the s t a t i o n a r y
allow the
study has
acety!ase
hydroxylase
(a gift of M. Nirenberg)
culture
and
in the present
tyrosine
The~e
N 18 among the
Clone
used
dissolved
in
under m i c r o s c o p e
Pharmacological Research Communications, Vol. 5, No. 4, 1973
400
the a b s e n c e was
of ce]!
transferred
omn~fluor then
debris,
~nto
sc~nt~]!at~on
(New E n g l a n d
counted
in an
SL 30.
Student's
gramma
602.
(Lowry
et
L• ' u _r ! e a ~. ,
t test was were
al~.quot of form~_c acid
counting
USA)
Intertechn~que
Proteins
a!. ,
a certain
calculated
assayed
an~. IO r~.! of
.. added . .Th~
were
Liquid
vials
vials
Sc{nt:[llation
with
Counter
an O ! { v e t t i
follow.ing the
were
Pro-
Lowry's
method
: 1 9 5 1 ) .
R E S U L T <' L.)
•
Choline tion
and
enters when
uptake
function
in d i f f e r e n t i a t i o n
the cells
following
a saturation
view of the tiated
as
cells
plateau
changes showed
which
of time
.is shown a straight
for cells
~n F~.g• 1• 14C c h o l i n e l~ne
up to about
starts
I:o develop•
follow
serum withdrawal,
a markedly
h~gher
in p r o l i f e r a -
uptake
As
2 hours
exnected,
in
d~.fferen-
of chol~ne.
CpM/pg Prot xlO 2 Fig, :1. - C h o l ~ n e u p t a k e as f u n c t i o n of t i m e in prol i f e r a t i n z and d i f f e r e n t i a t i n g cells.
D
,
©
3
O
/
o e -/
6
1 30
90
Min
Each point is the mean value of at least six Petri dishes• E x p e r i m e n t a l c o n d i t i o n s as in T a b l e 1.
Pharmacolog/cal Research Communications, Vol. 5, No. 4, 1973 Substitution cesium,
of s o d i u m
l i t h i u m or s u c r o s e
the
uptake
and
differentiating
potassium
of
was
choline
ions
produced
total
cells
a definite
same
with
inhibition
V a l u e s are e x p r e s s e d dishes.
was
(Table
as m e a n s
Proliferation
Incubation time
90 min
Control
210 ±14 A
Cesium
122
±17
Control
210
±14 C
Lithium
147
±12.4
observed
Control
237
±14 E
157
±11.1
Potassium
Control
210 ±14 G
Sucrose
129
when
1).
±S.E.M.
in
of 5 Petri
Differentiation
P
60 rain 208
±12
129
,7
208
,12
148
±4
0.005
0.005
on
in b o t h p r o l i f e r a t i n g
effect
sodium
medium with
1-. E f f e c t of ionic s u b s t i t u t i o n on c h o l i n e u p t a k e p r o l i f e r a t i n g and d i f f e r e n t i a t i n g cells.
Table
-
incubating
radioactivity
; the
substituted
in the
401
P
90 min
P
381 ±5 B 0.025
0.025
270
±4.5
381
,5 D
312 ,5
0.025
0.05
373 ±10 F 0.005
294
,13
0.005
381 ±5 H
±7.5
0.005
250 ±5
0.005
NaCI 138 mM was s u b s t i t u t e d by CsCi, LiCI or s u c r o s e in e q u i m o lar c o n c e n t r a t i o n s . KCI 5.5 mM was s u b s t i t u t e d w i t h e q u i m o l a r NaCI. I n c u b a t i o n was p e r f o r m e d in 5 ml K r e b s - R i n g e r p h o s p h a t e at pH 7.2 c o n t a i n i n g 10 % fetal calf s e r u m in the case of cells in p r o l i f e r a t i o n . P r o b a b i l i t y of s t a t i s t i c a l s i g n i f i c a n c e was c a l c u l a t e d w i t h S t u d e n t ' s t test (two tail). A vs B, C vs D, E vs F~ G vs H = P < 0.001.
Table
1 shows
Petri d i s h e s is o b s e r v e d
a statistical
analyzed
in p a r a l l e l .
i~ c o m p a r i n g
ferentiating
cells.
Petri
which were
dishes
analysis
This
the
High
controls
difference
statistical
on s e p a r a t e difference
of p r o l i f e r a t i n g
was
incubated with
performed
still
valid
substituted
and dif-
a m o n g the ions.
402
Pharmacological Research Communications, Vol. 5, No. 4, 1973
Table
2 - E f f e c t of o u a b a i n proliferation. Values
are
on
choline
expressed
as
uptaZe
means ,
Ouabain
cpm/pg
,j
protein
P
n
278
±5
5
260
±5
5
Control -4 10 M
258
±8
10
204
±3
15
278
,5
5
216
±3
5
3 - E f f e c t of o u a b a i n differentiation. Values
Ouabain
D hrs.
Control -4 10 M
24
Control -4 10 M
48
Control -4 10 M
72
Control -4 10 M
120
are
cpm/~g
on
expressed prot.
n
30q
±11
12
347
±23
12
445
±19
12
441
±22
12
886
±56
11
750
±51
13
878
±23
3
571
±53
3
choline as
means P1
IF;
|
0.05
0.025
0.005
P represents a two tail probability. Conditions as in T a b l e 1. I n c u b a t i o n t i m e 90 min.
Table
cells
±S.E.V.
Control -5 10 M
Control -3 10 M
in
of
uptake
in
incubation
celIs
in
±S.E.M. P2
P3
P4
n.s. 0.005 n.s.
0.0005
0.0025
0.0005
0.005
0.025 n.s.
0.0005
D hrs., hours after serum withdrawal - Pt, p r o b a b i l i t y (two t a i l ) of s t a t i s t i c a l significance between control Petri dishes and o u a b a i n t r e a t e d - P2, P3, P4, p r o b a b i l i t y (two t a i l ) of statistical difference a m o n g c o n t r o l P e t r i d i s h e s at d i f f e r e n t t i m e s of d i f f e r e n t i a t i o n - n.s.~ not significant - n, n u m b e r of Petri dishes. Conditions of i n c u b a t i o n as in T a b l e 1. P2 vs c o n t r o l 24 hrs. - P3 vs c o n t r o l 48 hrs - P4 vs c o n t r o l 72 hrs.
Pharmacological Research Commun/cations, Vot. 5, No. 4, 1973 Ouabain and
10 -3 M)
ration ved
(Sigma Co. , USA) inhibited
(Table
in cells
withdrawal
P2,
P3,
for longer
statistical
time
significance
in p r o l i f e -
(10 -4 M) was obser-
72 hrs.
after
from Table
showed
10 4
serum
3 cells
a h i g h e r uptake
is shown
in the
kept
of
columns
P4.
ferentiation (Table
4).
was
affected
a drastic
Finally
bition of the uptake
4
(4°C)
producing
nal concentration)
Table
starting
(10 -5,
in cells
of ouabain
3). As can be observed
Low t e m p e r a t u r e
tion
concentrations
of choline
same effect
in d i f f e r e n t i a t i o n
(Table
the
the uptake
2). The
in d i f f e r e n t i a t i o n choline,
at different
403
when
decrease
potassium
added
was
both p r o l i f e r a t i o n
to the
in choline
ferricyanide
incubating
again o b s e r v e d
and dif-
incopora(10 -3 M fi-
medium,
an inhi-
(Table 4).
Effect of cyanide and low t e m p e r a t u r e on choline take in p r o l i f e r a t i n g and d i f f e r e n t i a t i n g cells. Values
are e x p r e s s e d
as means
±S.E.M.
Pro I i ferat ion cpm/ug
prof.
n =
up-
Differentiation P
cpm/ug
:
prot. - -
n
P
,
CYANIDE Control -3 10 M
270 ±6
9
239 ±9
10
328 0.005
~10
5
251 ±10
5
374 ,10
5
0.0005
TEMPERATURE Control
277
4°C
±14
5
11 ±1 ,,
,,,
,
5 r,,
0.0005 ,
.
.
.
18 ±4 .
_ _
5
0.0005
__ --
j,
m ,
n, number of Petri dishes ; P, p r o b a b i l i t y of s t a t i s t i c a l difference (two tail test). C o n d i t i o n s of i n c u b a t i o n as in Table I. Incubation time 90 rain.
DISCUSSION Cells
in d i f f e r e n t i a t i o n
uptake of choline
than those
clearly
showed
in p r o l i f e r a t i o n
a more p r o n o u n c e d (Fig.l).
From
404
Pharmacologica/ Research Comrnunicadons, Vol. 5, No. 4, 1973
Table
3 it a p p e a r s
three
folds
uptake
that
increasing
this the
of d i f f e r e n t i a t e d
seen
from the
Such
effect
occurs
values
may
after
serum
of c h o l i n e
membranes
; however
sibility
of a c h a n g e
the
from
P2 at the to the
velocity
and
the
significant right
!ipids,
as
can
be
3.
surface
increase
basic
Such
of T a b l e
in m e m b r a n e
to the
kept
up to a b o u t
wJthdrawa!.
extreme
and/or
to be
in the
serum
increase
containing it has
increased
Js highly
withdrawal
synthesis
affect
time
cells
of
be due
difference
which
in the
components
in c o n s i d e r a t i o n
structure
of the
membrane
mechanism
of the t r a n s p o r t
of the
the
pos-
which
may
of cho-
line. In o r d e r sodium
or p o t a s s i u m
medium.
a decrease
that
Li + and
sodium-potassium It is then
tained
was
of the
possibilities
crose
been
of
sodium
pump
the
: the
lack
one
of the
sodium
As
cation
produced and
1964;
the
et oZ.,
decrease direct
ob-
inhibi-
substitutes. observed to take or the
substitu-
inhibition
is p r o d u c e d of the
Na + pump,
a decrease
differentia'ring
with
into a c c o u n t
in v i e w
of the
also
Beaug6
or to the
which
expected,
sucrose,
on the
whether
ATPase
or
action
again
functioning
lithium
in the
inhibitory
by the
has
substituted
been
in u p t a k e
activated
data).
in p r o l i f e r a t i n g
state
mechanisms,
it has
of Na + ions
decrease
for the by
to
such
; however
and Ager,
produced
sucrose
(unpublished
of p o t a s s i u m
a direct
difficult lack
cesium,
uptake
(~ittam
on
entirely
with
in c h o l i n e
extracellular
ce of K + ions
take
have
Cs + have
sodium
of Na + with
Na + - K +
ions
due to the
Concerning tion
information
pump
1973).
tion
some
Substitution
produces shown
to g a t h e r
cells.
two
of by
su-
importan-
substitution
of c h o l i n e Increasing
up-
Pharmacologica/ Research Communications, Vo/. 5, No. 4, 1973 sodium concentration
in the medium did not influence the upta-
ke. The data demonstrate ke in neurob!astoma
405
the strict dependence of choline upta-
cells
in the incubating medium
to the presence
of Na + and K + ions
; dependence which
is again shown by
the inhibitory action of ouabain and by the necessity of potassium ion.
It is also possible
choline across
clone N18 cell membrane
mechanism since cyanide lowered
of
is an energy-dependent
and low temperature
have considerably
the uptake of choline.
Furthermore ne transport by an
to ~nfer that the transport
the presence of carriers
in neuroblastoma
for choli-
cultures has been recently
analysis of the kinetics
as well as in a cholinergic
necessary
of choline uptake
clone
found
in clone N18
(in preparation).
REFERENCES. Adamic, ~ , (1970): Biochim. Biophys. Acta 169, 113. Adamic, S., (1972): Biochem. Pharmacol. 21, 2---~25. Amano, T. , Richelson, E. and Nirenberg, M.W. , (1972) : Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 69, 258. Augusti-Tocco, G. and Sato, G., (1969): Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 64, 311. Beaug~, L.A., Medici, A. and Sjodin, R.A., (1973): J. Physiol. 228 , 1. Blume, A., Gilbert, F., Wilson, S., Farber, J., Rosenberg, R. and Nirenberg, M.W., (1970): Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 67 , 786. Diamond, I. and Kennedy, E.P., (1969): J. Biol. Chem. 244, 3258. Diamond, I. and Milfay, D., (1972): J. Neurochem. 19, 1899. Green, A.R., Boullin, D.J., Massarelli, R. and Hanin, I., (1972): Life Sci. 11, 1049. Haga, T. and Noda, H., (1-973): Biochim. Biophys. Acta 291, 504. Hanin, I., Massarelli, R. and Costa, E., (1970): Drugs and cholinergic mechanisms in the central nervous system, E.Heilbronn and A. Winter, Eds., Res. Inst. Natl. Def., Stockholm. Hanin, I., Massarelli, R. and Costa, E., (1972): J. Pharmacol. Exper. Therap. 181, 10. Hermetet, J.C., Ciesie--~ki-Treska, J. and Handel, P., (1972): J. Histochem. Cytochem. 20, 137. Hodgkin, A.L. and Martin, K., ~-f965): J. Physiol. 179, 26. Lowry, O.H., Rosebrough~ M.J., Farr, A.L. and Randall, R.J., (1951): J. Biol. Chem. 193~ 265.
.
•
•
15
¢D
f,O-
C~
~
~
• O~)
~-J
•
•
=~_
-~
.
{D
(,~
•
cO
C')
> ~ c ~
00~
•
(~ ~-~ I--'
r~
(~
,--' 0
~o 0
~,,.~
CO 0
.-
D
--~o -- nl~ D'~
.
~
---
D
.
~ID
~-~
0 0 . ~
"~-'~
~ . ,
< •
o .'~ ~ "
CO.,, ~ i - i ('3 cO u:) ~-'. ,--] C'~
~
t2,-
~
O~-' "-'~
-~ • , . ~ .,..~-.~ . . C_~
~.'~
.~
:~-
~,,2
•
•~
•
•
~
~
~-,
•
(8
~-.~ ~
~-
I
D
C~ "-~
o
O0
r-J
OJ
•
C_~
•
~-
,.--,
or, - a c n co. co
U" .1=" ~
Y
:~.~.
0 0
,':~" "U~
•-'
-.
}--~
"-~
. . . .
.--. ~.~ ,m. ,..D uP 2-~
~
~-
O
Qo
C}
{3
B"
{3
c~
~r
2}
c}
8"
~r