Chromatography of Ehrlich ascites tumor cell high molecular weight ribonucleic acid on calcium phosphate

Chromatography of Ehrlich ascites tumor cell high molecular weight ribonucleic acid on calcium phosphate

Vol. 6, No. 1,196l BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS CRRCMATOGRAPRI OF RRRLICH ASCITRS TZMOR CRLL HIGH MOLECULAR WRIGHT RIBONUCL...

164KB Sizes 0 Downloads 97 Views

Vol. 6, No. 1,196l

BIOCHEMICAL

AND BIOPHYSICAL

RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

CRRCMATOGRAPRI OF RRRLICH ASCITRS TZMOR CRLL HIGH MOLECULAR WRIGHT RIBONUCLEIC ACID

CALC1l.M PROSPMTE

ON

Giorgio Bernardi and Serge N. Timasheff* Centre de Recherches sur les Macromolecules Strasbourg, France

Received

31, 1961

July

The results

reported

in a recent

ribonucleic

acid

investigate

the chromatographic

acid

on calcium

(RNA) on this

results

bearing

phosphate

gel

present Colter

material.

was extracted

1.4 x lo6 by light ultracentrifuge, The slower

for

the

properties

samples

and Brown,

in very

communication

we.will

describe

of passage

through

The RNA sample tumor

cells

molecular

showed

two peaks

37%, the

faster with

and Brown,

1956;

of used in the of

was found

to be

in the analytical one with

one for those

a calcium

by the method

weight

s = 19 S, the faster

good agreement

of RNA (Colter

ribonucleic

ascites

the sample

for

us to

weight

columns.

average

one with

encouraged

of RNA and the possibility

Ehrlich

weight

accounted

63% of the material.

reported

Kronman,

s = 32 S.

by Brown --et al. Timasheff,

Colter

1960).

Chromatographic hydroxyapatite (1955).

Its

of deoxy-

molecular

the effect

phosphate

slower

are

of high

properties

scattering;

component

similar

namely

from

(1956).

1961)

In the present

RNA on calcium

work

on the chromatography

(Bernardi,

behavior

on two points,

and Brown

These

phosphate

on the physical

fractionating

paper

prepared

The duration

experiments according

were

carried

to the method

of each experiment

never

out at room temperature of Tiselius, exceeded

Hjertzn

on and Levin

one hour.

*Senior Post-tictoral Fellow of the National Science Foundation, U. S. A., Eastern Regional Research Laboratory, U. S. 1959-60; permanent address: Department of Agriculture, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 58

Vol. 6, No. 1,196l

BIOCHEMICAL

In a first calcium

series

phosphate

sium phosphate solvent,

buffer,

of the

analysis,

from

larger

large

samples

phosphate

the control

molecular

sample

that

adsorption-desorption reported

data

within

deal

with

after

solutions

were

the control of only

stored.

It

the state

M phosphate

stronger

decrease

place

molecular

after

in F about

weight

the continued

Time

These

was 1.4

out

value

prevented

were

showed

were

the

the

that all

the

(generally

found

former

and s after in

of

to those

remarkably

While

of x

Aggregation

similar

in

show unequi-

as a result

1960),

however,

scatter-

RNA was

results

to point

effects,

and Brown,

the latter

24 hours

suffici-

as described

The disytmaetry

important

samples.

in its

(20-259.).

s = 14 S.

already

when the different

showed

24 hours

in a drop

at 20'

the same conditions

phenomena

us from seeing

which whether

a much

invariably the drop

continued.

The observed mild

is

effects,

buffer),

adsorbed

of light

(prepared

sample.

at

in two

the sample

of the RNA as soon as possible

Colter

(l-57.)

sedimented

of eluted

of the RNA decreases

and the chromatographed

a few percent

0.20

weight

These

sample

sample,

buffer

one peak with

weight

of 1.4 x 106. the eluted

Timasheff,

Elution

By ultracentrifugal

sample whereas

molecular

chromatography.

(Kronman,

the starting

As a control

started.

only

H potas-

pH - 6.8.

the performance

the control

procedure.

1 hour)

reported

to permit

weight

the molecular

with

(25 mg RNA on 9x2 cm columns)

average

and 1.1 in

on the

M in phosphate

the control

showed

obtained

The weight

column

absorption.

the column

experiments

were

adsorbed in 0.005

buffer,

of RNA from to show that

scale

showed's

vocally

M phosphate

of ultraviolet

to be 0.7 x 106, whereas

above)

the

was made 0.20

calcium

ing measurements.

quite

0.20

washing

s = 20 S and s = 29 S, respectively,

Using

took

After

solution

was possible

on and eluted

(in

with

as elution

it

peaks with

found

pH - 6.8.

starting

mg of RNA were

x 6 cm) as a 0.05% solution

on the basis

the same time

ently

(1.3

RNA was desorbed

an aliquot

l-4

of experiments,

columns

was quantitative

AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

degradation

conditions degradation

of RNA on the calcium

(pH 6.8, after

012 M phosphate passage 59

through

buffer) the

phosphate and, column

column

under

in particular, are

in sharp

in

Vol. 6, No. 1,196l contrast

BIOCHEMICAL

with

connection recent

the behavior

with

reports

of DNA on similar

the present of Brown

on the reversible

AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

dissociation

(Bernardi,

it is of interest

observation,

et al.

colums

(Brown,

Ellem

of similar

In

to recall

and Colter,

samples

1961).

1960;

the

Brown,

of ENA under

quite

1961) mild

conditions. Fractionation

of ENA was attempted

scheme shown in Fig. phate

(Fig.

line.

result

DNA (Bernardi, obtained

is

1961).

are "false"

however,

and no further

coefficients,

This

can be obtained,

The two fractions,

1).

sedimentation

Two peaks

1.

by stepwise

similar

to that

In both peaks

were work

(Hjerte'n,

it

according

at 0.15

and 0.20

found

out

quite

M phos-

along

in the fractionation is

to the

to have identical

was carried

obtained

instances

elution

possible

that

that of native

the peaks

1959).

LO-

3.0 -

2.0 -

LO-

F

3 *

1 Od 0

1

I-

20

40

:

0.25 L

0.50 1

I \-60

FRACTIONS

Fig. 1 Chromatography The stepwise increases arrows.

of Ehrlich in buffer

Ascites molarity

60

Tumor BNA on calcium phosphate. are indicated by the vertical

Vol. 6, No. 1,196l

BIOCHEMICAL

The authors making

available

wish

to thank

the sample

AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS Drs.

Raymond A.

of RNA used

in this

Brown and John S. Colter

for

study.

REFERENCES

Bernardi,

G., Biochem. Biophys. Research Cowmzns.5, 54 (1961)

Brown, RI A.; Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., U. S., 47, 465 (1961). Brown, R. A., Ellem, K. A. 0. and Colter, J. S., Nature 187, 509 (1960). Coltef, J. S. and Brown, R. A., Science 124, 1077 (1956). Biophys. Acta 3l, 216 (1959). Hjerten, S., Biochim. S. N., Colter, J. S. and Brown, R. A., Biochim, Rronman, M. J., Timasheff, Biophys. Acta 4C, 410 (1960). Tiseliua, A., Hjerten, S. and Levin, O., Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 65, 132 (1955).

61