Citrate synthase of bean seedlings — comparison of activity following in vitro and in vivo treatments of enzyme

Citrate synthase of bean seedlings — comparison of activity following in vitro and in vivo treatments of enzyme

Pergamon Press Vol . 8, Part II, pp . 933-938, 1969 . Life Sciences Printed in Great Britain CITRATE SYNTHASE OF BEAN SEEDLINGS - COMPARISON OF ACTI...

206KB Sizes 0 Downloads 17 Views

Pergamon Press

Vol . 8, Part II, pp . 933-938, 1969 . Life Sciences Printed in Great Britain

CITRATE SYNTHASE OF BEAN SEEDLINGS - COMPARISON OF ACTIVITY FOLLOWING in vitro AND in vivo TREATMENTS OF ENZYME Igor V. Sarkissian and Frank C . Schmalstieg Texas AéM University, College Station,

Texas

(Received 14 April 1969 ; in final form 26 May 1969) Stimulation of activity in vitro of citrate synthase (E .C .4 .1 .3 .7) by concentrations of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) has been described (2,3) .

low

It was

suggested that this interaction reflected an allosteric property of citrate synthase (CS) with regard to IAA (3,4,5) .

In the present communication we show

that the allosteric property of CS is very labile and that it depends on the conditions of growth of individuals serving as sources of enzyme .

We use the

word "allosteric", a term defined by Monod, Changeux and Jacob (1) to describe a protein whose function is regulated by a metabolite which is not a necessary component of the reaction .

While their definition indicates that the allosteric

effector binds with the protein in question (although reversibly),

in the

present case the binding of IAA is not involved in the reaction proper synthesis of citric acid . in the protein which,

IAA merely causes an apparently irreversible change

once effected, does not require IAA to maintain this

changed state . Materials and Methods Citrate synthase was isolated from protein of root tips of 6-day-old seedlings of bean

(Phaseolus vulgaris , cultivar Burpee's Stringlesa Greenpod) .

the conditions of culture are shown in the tables . 50-gram batches of root

Extraction was as follows :

tips were chilled immediately after harvest and were

cut into very small pieces .

The roots were then homogenized in the grinding

medium for 4 minutes in a Waring blender with the rheostat set at 40 .

The

grinding medium was 400 ml of 0 .02 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, containing 100

933

934

CITRATE SYNTHASE

mg of cyateine .

Vol. 8, No. 18

The homogenate was strained through 4 layers of cheesecloth

and then through nylon cloth with mesh of about 50 u .

The volume of the

filtrate was noted and 31 .3 g of ammonium sulfate per 100 ml of liquid were added slowly with stirring .

the mixture was stirred for additional 10 minutes

to insure complete dissolution of ammonium sulfate and was then centrifuged for 15 minutes at 15,000 x g . carded .

The supernatant was saved and the pellet dis-

Additional ammonium sulfate was added to the supernatant (13 .5 g/100 ml)

with stirring as before . 15,000 x g .

The solution was centrifuged for 15 minutes at

The supernatant was discarded and the white pellet was dissolved

in about 20 ml of cold deionized water .

The protein solution was then dialyzed

for 6 hrs against 4 liters of 0 .002 M potassium phosphate buffer, pH 7 .4 .

After

dialysis, the enzyme solution was centrifuged for 10 minutes at 10,000 x g . The small pellet was discarded and the enzyme was ready for use .

All isolation

procedures were carried out at 0-4° and the final enzyme solution was kept on ice . Activity was determined by rate of disappearance of the thiol ester bond of acetyl-coenzyme A at 233 m u

in nmoles/liter/min .

The rate of the reaction

was linear for at least 2 min .

The reaction mixture was composed of 130 umolea

of potassium phosphate buffer, pH 7 .4 ; enzyme protein as indicated ; 0 .75 umolea of freshly prepared oxalacetate at pH 7 .4 ; 0 .012 umolea of acetyl-Co A . used, IAA was at a final concentration of 1 .54 x 10 -11M . 1 .3 ml with pH of 7 .4 .

The temperature was 28 .8 ° .

apectrophotometrically (6) .

When

The final volume was

Protein was determined

The organic reagents were from the Nutritional

Biochemicals Corporation . Results and Discussion One problem confronting us was the variability of response of isolated citrate synthase to IAA .

We were cultivating the bean seedlings in a green-

house with no regulation of temperature and occasionally the isolated enzyme, although fully active, would not be affected at all by IAA .

Since day - and

night - temperatures are quite high here for about 7 months we suspected that

995

CITRATE SYNTHASE

Vol . 8, No . 18

the environment in which the plants were cultured led to the inability of citrate synthase to be stimulated by IAA .

Data summarized in Table 1 show the

effects of environment on the alloeteric property of CS . TABLE 1 Effects of Light and Temperature on the Allosteric Property of Citrate Synthese In Roots of 6-day-old Bean Seedlings mg Protein

Reaction

in Reaction - per mg Protein

Mixture A.

B.

C.

Velocity

Control

0 .336

9,834

1 .54 x 10 -11M IAA

0 .336

13,529

Control

0 .288

10,815

1 .54 x 10 -1 ~ IAA

0 .288

14,070

Control

0 .288

11,725

1 .54 x 10 -11M IAA

0 .288

12,425

Percent Change

+38

+30

+ 6

Reaction mixture and velocity are defined in Materials and Methods . A ~ seedlinge grown in vermiculite at 20 ° , continuous darkness . B ~ seedlinge grown in vermiculite under daily regime of 12 hrs of 20° and light followed by 12 hrs of 30 ° and darkness . C ~ seedlinge grown in vermiculite at 30 ° , continuous darkness . the enzyme isolated from roots of plants grown in the dark, at 20° was stimulated by IAA .

The enzyme from plants exposed to light and 20° during the

day and darkness and 30 ° during the night also responded to IAA . was somewhat reduced, however .

The response

It is of interest that the control reactions

in this case increased somewhat in specific activity (velocity/mg protein) . Enzyme from plants grown constantly at 30 ° in the dark was almost totally "desensitized" to IAA, i .e ., it could not be stimulated by IAA .

The specific

activity of control CS in this case increased again . These experiments reveal that the alloeteric property of CS with respect to IAA is modified by the environment under which the organism develops . is evident that the key factor is temperature .

It

The enzyme from plants grown

CITRATE SYNTHASE

93 6

Vol . 8, No. 18

at 30° , although highly active, does not respond markedly to IAA . mechanism of "desensitization" is not fully understood .

This

It may be due to

alight changes in the native state of the enzyme or, in the present case, heat denaturation .

The possibility is not discounted that it occurs through inter-

vention of a metabolite which "protects" the enzyme from IAA .

The increase in

activity of control reaction (C va A, Table 1), on the other hand, may be the result of increase of endogenous IAA which stimulated activity of CS and at the same time desensitized it .

If, as suggested by ua recently (5), the allosteric

behavior of citrate synthase is a result of conformational changes of the enzyme regulated by IAA, then both increased activity and desensitization may be related to increase of endogenous IAA .

We have noted repeatedly under our

experimental conditions that activity of CS exposed to IAA is no longer affected by changes in IAA concentrations . In Table 2 are shown activities of CS from roots of beans grown at 20° in the presence of exogenous IAA and without IAA .

The enzyme from seedlings

grown in the absence of IAA is stimulated 72% in vitro by IAA .

The enzyme

from seedlings grown in the presence of 10 -6M IAA is not stimulated in vitro by IAA .

It is significant that the specific activity of the desensitized

enzyme is increased .

When the control reactions (activity without IAA in the

reaction mixture) are compared, the activity of CS from seedlings grown with added IAA exceeds that of control seedlings by 74% .

This increase is almost

identical to that of CS of control seedlings reacted in the presence of IAA . When IAA was added to the homogenate during isolation the effect on the isolated citrate synthase was essentially the same as that when the seedlings were grown in the presence of added IAA (Table 3) .

The enzyme was desensitized

to IAA but the specific activity of control CS was increased .

Vol. 8, No. 18

93 7

CITRATE SYNTHASE

TABLE 2 Effects of Exogenous Indoleacetic Acid on Citrate Synthase of Roots of 6-day-old Bean Seedlings mg

Reaction Mixture A.

- -

Protein

in Reaction

Velocity

Percent

-per m~Protein

Change -

Control

0 .360

6,300

1.54 x 10 -1 ~ IAA

0 .360

10,822

0.360

10,948

0 .360

9,800

B. Control 1 .54 x 10 -1-M IAA Control B vs Control A

+72

-12 +74

Velocity is defined in Materials and Methods . A = seedlings grown at 20 ° in vermiculite, irrigated with deionized wgter. B ~ seedlings grown in vermiculite, irrigated with 1 liter of 1 x 10 M IAA.

TABLE 3 Effects of Addition of Indoleacetic Acid lluring Isolation of Citrate S~~nthase on the Allosteric Property of the Enzyme Reaction

mg Protein

Mixture

in Reaction-- ~er~g Protei n -

A.

Control ] . 54 x l0

K.

-10

rf IAA

Control 1 .54 x 10 -11M IAA

li

IAA vs Control A

felocity

0 .480

8,362

0 .480

11,565

0 .480

11,149

0 .480

11,149

Percent Change

+38

0 +33

A,B = differently treated extracts of citrate synthase of one batch of root tips . A was extracted as usual ; in preparing isolate B, the homogenate following the first ammonium sulfate precipitation was made 4 .6 x 10 M IAA, stirred 10 min and then the isolation was continued as in A.

CITRATE 3YNTHA3E

938

Vol. 8, No. 18

These data indicate that IAA stimulates citrate synthase not only in vitro , but also to the same degree during isolation and fully in vivo .

Lack of

reactivity with IAA of CS stimulated in vivo suggests that such enzyme can not be stimulated further and is consistent with the view that stimulation of citrate synthase involves a conformational change of the enzyme .

The possibility

that IAA interacts with SH groups of CS, thereby ultimately desensitizing the enzyme has been suggested (4,5) .

It appears then, that once CS has been

activated by IAA in vivo or in vitro the activity is irreversible . It would seem then, that the allosteric property of citrate synthase with regard to IAA is extremely labile .

The sensitivity of the enzyme to the

hormone thus appears to be regulated by the hormone itself .

It is suggested

that investigations of detailed mechanism of the citrate synthase : IAA interactions be carried out with an enzyme isolated from tissues where it is not desensitized by heat or activated by the hormone itself or possible by other metabolites . Acknowledgement This work was supported by National Science Foundation Grant GB - 7618 . References 1.

J . MONOD, J . P . CHANCEUX and F . JACOB, J . Mol . Biol ., 6, 306 (1963) .

2.

I .V . SARKISSLAN, Physiol . Plantaru~ 19, 328 (1966) .

3.

I . V . SARKISSIAN, Biochemistry of Plant Growth Hormones , Runge Press, Ottawa, in press .

4.

I . V . SARKISSIAN and F .C . SCHI9ALSTIEG, Federation Proc ., 28, 414 (1969) .

5.

I .V . SARKISSIAN and F .C . SCHMALSTIEG, Naturwissenschaften , 56, 1969, in press .

6.

0 . WARBURG and W . CHRISTIAN, Biochem Z . , 310, 384 (1941-2) .