G Model PRP-51316; No. of Pages 9
ARTICLE IN PRESS Pathology – Research and Practice xxx (2014) xxx–xxx
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Pathology – Research and Practice journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/prp
Original article
Clinicopathologic correlations of the BRAFV600E mutation, BRAF V600E immunohistochemistry, and BRAF RNA in situ hybridization in papillary thyroid carcinoma Yoon Yang Jung a , Jae Hyung Yoo b , Eon Sub Park b , Mi Kyung Kim b , Tae Jin Lee b , Bo Youn Cho d,e , Yun Jae Chung d,e , Kyung Ho Kang c,e , Hwa Young Ahn d,e , Hee Sung Kim b,e,∗ a
Department of Pathology and Translational Genomics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea Department of Pathology, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea c Department of Surgery, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea d Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea e Thyroid Center, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea b
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history: Received 6 May 2014 Received in revised form 13 October 2014 Accepted 15 October 2014 Keywords: Papillary carcinoma BRAF V600E mutation Immunohistochemistry RNA in situ hybridization
a b s t r a c t Background: The BRAFV600E mutation is the most common genetic alteration in papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). The aim of this study is to analyze the clinicopathologic correlations of the BRAFV600E mutation, BRAF V600E immunohistochemistry (IHC) and BRAF RNA in situ hybridization (ISH) in PTC. Methods: This study included 467 patients with PTC who underwent surgical resection. We studied the BRAFV600E mutation using real-time PCR and BRAF V600E and BRAF RNA ISH using tissue microarray (TMA). Results: The frequencies of a positive BRAFV600E mutation by real-time PCR, positive BRAF V600E IHC, and high BRAF RNA ISH were 84%, 86%, and 70%, respectively, in PTC. Conventional PTC had higher positive rates in all three tests than other histologic types. The BRAFV600E mutation, BRAF V600E IHC, low Ct, and high BRAF RNA ISH were significantly associated with lymph node metastasis. The BRAFV600E mutation was significantly associated with positive immunostaining for BRAF V600E mutant protein (P < 0.001) overall, with high BRAF RNA ISH only in the follicular variant (P = 0.035). No significant correlation was noted between BRAF V600E IHC and BRAF RNA ISH. The sensitivity of BRAF V600E IHC for the BRAFV600E mutation was 95%, and the specificity was 61% overall, 96% and 54% in the conventional type, and 85% and 70% in the follicular variant. Conclusions: Our results showed that positive BRAF V600E IHC significantly correlated with the BRAFV600E mutation. This suggests its clinical utility as a screening tool for the BRAFV600E mutation. In addition, a high BRAF RNA ISH score could be a candidate marker of aggressive behavior in BRAFV600E mutation-positive cases of PTC. © 2014 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.
Introduction Papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) is the most common subtype of thyroid cancer, accounting for about 80% of all thyroid malignancies [2]. The BRAFV600E mutation is the most common type of BRAF mutation, and has been detected in 30–83% of PTCs [14]. The BRAF oncogene encodes the human gene for B-type Raf kinase. Over 30 mutations of BRAF associated with human cancers have been
∗ Corresponding author. Tel.: +82 2 6299 2758; fax: +82 2 6293 5630. E-mail address:
[email protected] (H.S. Kim).
identified [7], the majority of which are located within the kinase domain. In an analysis of 22 BRAF mutants, 18 had elevated kinase activity and signaled to ERK in vivo. Three other mutants had reduced kinase activity toward MEK in vitro but, by activating CRAF in vivo, signaled to ERK in cells [26]. The T1799A point mutation in exon 15 of BRAF (thymidine-toadenine transversion) results in a valine-to-glutamate substitution at position 600 (V600E) and activates the RAS/RAF/MAPK signaling pathway by disrupting hydrophobic interactions between residues in both the activation loop and the ATP binding site [26]. This pathway is hyperactivated in about 30% of cancers including malignant melanoma, papillary thyroid carcinoma, pilocytic astrocytoma, adenocarcinoma of the lung, ovarian neoplasms, hairy cell
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prp.2014.10.005 0344-0338/© 2014 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.
Please cite this article in press as: Y.Y. Jung, et al., Clinicopathologic correlations of the BRAFV600E mutation, BRAF V600E immunohistochemistry, and BRAF RNA in situ hybridization in papillary thyroid carcinoma, Pathol. – Res. Pract (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prp.2014.10.005
G Model PRP-51316; No. of Pages 9 2
ARTICLE IN PRESS Y.Y. Jung et al. / Pathology – Research and Practice xxx (2014) xxx–xxx
Fig. 1. BRAF V600E immunohistochemistry shows cytoplasmic localization of BRAF V600E protein in PTC. (A) Negative staining; (B) positive staining.
Fig. 2. BRAF mRNA expression level evaluated by RNA ISH in PTC. (A) Score 0; (B) score 1; (C) score 2; (D) score 4; (original magnification 400×).
Please cite this article in press as: Y.Y. Jung, et al., Clinicopathologic correlations of the BRAFV600E mutation, BRAF V600E immunohistochemistry, and BRAF RNA in situ hybridization in papillary thyroid carcinoma, Pathol. – Res. Pract (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prp.2014.10.005
G Model PRP-51316; No. of Pages 9
ARTICLE IN PRESS Y.Y. Jung et al. / Pathology – Research and Practice xxx (2014) xxx–xxx
3
leukemia, and colorectal carcinoma [4,8]. Previous studies have shown the association of BRAFV600E with aggressive clinicopathologic characteristics of PTC, such as extrathyroid extension and lymph node metastasis [16,21]. However, other studies found no correlation between this BRAF mutation and aggressive clinicopathologic features [17]. Initially, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was the only widely used method for detection of the BRAF mutation; however, this method is expensive and time-consuming. Recently, several studies have shown the usefulness of immunohistochemical staining for detection of BRAFV600E mutation in various neoplasms [13,18,19,24]. This technique relies on the immunogen of the mouse anti-human BRAFV600E monoclonal antibody (Clone VE1), which is a synthetic peptide representing the BRAFV600E amino acid sequence from residue 596 to 606 (GLATEKSRWSG). Furthermore, the novel method of RNA in situ hybridization (ISH) directly visualizes the RNA transcripts. Although the efficacy of this technique is still being investigated, data from initial studies show that it can be a clinically useful option [10,15]. The aim of this study is to investigate the clinicopathologic correlations of the BRAFV600E mutation, BRAF V600E IHC, and BRAF RNA ISH, and the intercorrelations among the results of all three methods for detecting molecular alterations of BRAF in PTC. Materials and methods Patient selection The archives of the Chung-Ang University Hospital (Seoul, South Korea) were searched over a 24-month period (January 2011 to December 2012), and a total of 467 patients who had undergone surgical resection due to PTC and had tumor nodule measuring greater than 4 mm in the largest dimension were selected. The clinicopathologic and molecular data for each patient, including age at diagnosis, sex, tumor size, number of tumors, levels of thyroglobulin and antimicrosomal antibody, and BRAFV600E mutation status were obtained from our database. The presence of extrathyroidal extension, perineural invasion, and vascular invasion were also analyzed. In cases with multiple tumor nodules, the largest tumor nodule was defined as the dominant nodule. Non-neoplastic thyroid tissue was evaluated for the presence of lymphocytic thyroiditis. The age of the subjects ranged from 13 to 77 years at the time of diagnosis (median age: 46.0 years). The tumor size ranged from 0.4 to 6.5 cm (median size: 0.8 cm). All PTCs were classified and subtyped according to the World Health Organization criteria outlined in 2004 [23] and staged according to the AJCC staging manual [6]. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Chung-Ang University Hospital (IRB No. C2013138 (1098)). Tissue microarray construction H&E-stained slides were observed and the appropriate tumor area was marked. The corresponding paraffin block was retrieved and the marked areas were matched. The cores of tumor areas were manually punched using a precision instrument (Labro TMA kit) and embedded into the recipient block with 60 microholes (diameter, 2 mm; depth, 5 mm) [20]. The microarray blocks were heated at 60 ◦ C for 30 min.
Fig. 3. Venn diagram showing overlap of positive BRAFV 600E mutation prediction by real-time PCR, BRAF V600E immunohistochemistry, and BRAF RNA in situ hybridization in PTC.
Dual-priming oligonucleotide-based PCR analysis was performed using Anyplex BRAFV600E Real-time Detection (v2.0) system (Seegene, Seoul, South Korea). Each PCR reaction mixture contained 2 l 5× BRAF primer, 3 l 8-methoxypsoralen solution, 5 l extracted DNA, and 10 l 2× Anyplex PCR master mix for a total volume of 20 l. PCR was performed using a GeneAmp 7500 Real-time PCR System (Applied Biosystem, Foster City, CA, USA). Reactions underwent an initial 15 min incubation at 94 ◦ C, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94 ◦ C for 30 s, annealing at 62 ◦ C for 30 s, and extension at 72 ◦ C for 60 s, and a final extension at 72 ◦ C for 10 min. If the Ct value of the internal control or V600E was ≥30 or undetermined, it was interpreted as negative. If the Ct was ≤13, it was regarded as positive for the BRAFV600E mutation. The Ct value was calculated as the difference in the cycle threshold between the target (BRAFV600E ) and the internal control. Immunohistochemistry Four m-thick sections of the formalin-fixed, paraffinembedded tissue microarray blocks were prepared for immunohistochemistry. These sections were incubated with mouse anti-human BRAFV600E monoclonal antibody (Clone VE1) (1:50, Spring Bioscience, CA, USA) using the Ventana Benchmark XT automated staining system (Ventana Medical Systems, Tucson, AZ) as recently described [13]. As controls, PTC tissue which had a V600E mutation previously detected by capillary sequencing, and PTC tissues which showed strong, moderate, or no V600E protein expression, as well as tissues lacking the V600E mutation, were stained with every batch. Cytoplasmic staining was scored as positive or negative according to the intensity. Faint or weak cytoplasmic staining was considered negative. Moderate or strong cytoplasmic staining was considered positive (Fig. 1). The slides were read by two pathologists (Y.Y.J., H.S.K). In case of a discrepancy, the case was discussed using a multihead microscope until a consensus was reached.
Real-time PCR RNA in situ hybridization (ISH) H&E-stained slides were reviewed and the appropriate areas were marked. QIAmp DNA mini kits (QIAGEN, Chatsworth, CA, USA) were used for genomic DNA extraction.
Tissue microarray (TMA) blocks were used for RNA ISH. BRAF RNA transcripts were detected using the RNA ISH 2.0 FFPE assay
Please cite this article in press as: Y.Y. Jung, et al., Clinicopathologic correlations of the BRAFV600E mutation, BRAF V600E immunohistochemistry, and BRAF RNA in situ hybridization in papillary thyroid carcinoma, Pathol. – Res. Pract (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prp.2014.10.005
G Model
ARTICLE IN PRESS
PRP-51316; No. of Pages 9
Y.Y. Jung et al. / Pathology – Research and Practice xxx (2014) xxx–xxx
4
Table 1 Clinicopathologic correlations of the BRAFV600E mutation and BRAF V600E IHC in PTC. BRAFV600E mutation Total
Total
Wild type
Mutant
BRAF V600E IHC P
Negative
Positive
P
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
467
100
74
16
393
84
65
14
402
86
Age
≤45 years >45 years
233 234
50 50
35 39
15 17
198 195
85 83
0.626
33 32
14 14
200 202
86 86
0.879
Size
≤2 cm >2 cm
433 34
93 7
66 8
15 24
367 26
85 76
0.203
57 8
13 24
376 26
87 76
0.118*
Subtype
Conventional Follicular variant Others
402 50 15
86 11 3
46 23 5
11 46 33
356 27 10
89 54 67
<0.001*
41 20 4
10 40 27
361 30 11
90 60 73
<0.001*
Extrathyroidal extension
Absent Present
323 144
69 31
53 21
16 15
270 123
84 85
0.618
45 20
14 14
278 124
86 86
0.990
Multiplicity
Absent Present
272 195
58 42
47 27
17 14
225 168
83 86
0.316
40 25
15 13
232 170
85 87
0.562
LNM
Absent Present
196 271
42 58
42 32
21 12
154 239
79 88
0.005
36 29
18 11
160 242
82 89
0.018
CLT
Absent Present
317 150
68 32
45 29
14 19
272 121
86 81
0.156
42 23
13 15
275 127
87 85
0.543
Lymphatic invasion
Absent Present
462 5
99 1
72 2
16 40
390 3
84 60
0.180*
63 2
14 40
399 3
86 60
0.144*
Perineural invasion
Absent Present
433 34
93 7
72 2
17 6
361 32
83 94
0.098
62 3
14 9
371 31
86 91
0.605*
Blood vessel invasion
Absent Present
464 3
99 1
73 1
16 33
391 2
84 67
0.405*
65 0
14 0
399 3
86 100
1.000*
pN
pN0 pN1a pN1b
213 198 56
46 42 12
44 20 10
21 10 18
169 178 46
79 90 82
0.012
37 19 9
17 10 16
176 179 47
83 90 84
0.066
AJCC stage
I II III IV
309 17 118 23
66 4 25 5
50 4 15 5
16 24 13 22
259 13 103 18
84 76 87 78
0.443*
42 5 14 4
14 29 12 17
267 12 104 19
86 71 88 83
0.238*
Ki67 labeling index
≤5 >5
412 52
89 11
68 5
17 10
344 47
83 90
0.199
61 3
15 6
351 49
85 94
0.075
Tg Ab level
Normal High
350 80
81 19
50 12
14 15
300 68
86 85
0.870
44 13
13 16
306 67
87 84
0.381
Antimicrosomal Ab level
Normal High
350 79
82 18
46 17
13 22
304 62
87 78
0.057
45 12
13 15
305 67
87 85
0.581
* Fisher’s exact test. Ab, antibody; CLT, chronic lymphocytic thyroiditis; IHC, immunohistochemistry; LNM, lymph node metastasis; Tg, thyroglobulin
(Advanced Cell Diagnostics, Hayward, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, 4 m FFPE tissue sections were pretreated by heating and protease application prior to hybridization with a BRAF target probe. The detailed procedure was previously described [25]. Brown punctuated dots were used for scoring. Probes to the endogenous ubiquitin C (UBC) were used as positive control. The cases were categorized into five grades, 0–4, according to the number of brown punctuated dots in the nucleus and/or cytoplasm (Fig. 2). The grades were assigned as follows: no staining (score 0), staining that was difficult to see under the 40× objective lens in more than 10% of tumor cells (score 1), staining that was difficult to see under the 20× objective lens, but was easily seen under the 40× objective lens in more than 10% of tumor cells (score 2), staining that was difficult to see under the 10× objective lens, but was easily seen under the 20× objective in more than 10% of tumor cells (score 3), and staining that was easy to see under the 10× objective lens in more than 10% of tumor cells (score 4). The slides were read by two pathologists (Y.Y.J., H.S.K). In case of a discrepancy, the case
was discussed through a multihead microscope until a consensus was reached. Statistical analysis Statistical analysis was performed with the SPSS software (SPSS standard version 18.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). A 2 test or Fisher’s exact test was applied as appropriate to evaluate the statistical significance. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results Clinicopathologic correlations of BRAFV600E mutation by real-time PCR, BRAF V600E IHC, and BRAF RNA ISH in PTC The BRAFV600E mutation was detected in 265 (89%) of 302 cases of conventional subtype PTC by real-time PCR. Twenty-seven (54%) of 50 cases and 10 (67%) of 15 cases carried the BRAFV600E mutation in follicular variant PTC and other subtypes of PTC, respectively.
Please cite this article in press as: Y.Y. Jung, et al., Clinicopathologic correlations of the BRAFV600E mutation, BRAF V600E immunohistochemistry, and BRAF RNA in situ hybridization in papillary thyroid carcinoma, Pathol. – Res. Pract (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prp.2014.10.005
G Model
ARTICLE IN PRESS
PRP-51316; No. of Pages 9
Y.Y. Jung et al. / Pathology – Research and Practice xxx (2014) xxx–xxx
5
Table 2 Clinicopathologic correlation of the Ct value for the BRAFV600E mutation in PTC. Ct≤7.45
Total
Total
Ct >7.45
P
N
%
N
%
N
%
371
100
189
51
182
49
Age
≤45 years >45 years
188 183
51 49
103 86
55 47
85 97
45 53
0.133
Size
≤2 cm >2 cm
347 24
93 7
171 18
49 75
176 6
51 25
0.015
Subtype
Conventional Follicular variant Others
340 24 7
92 6 2
181 7 1
53 29 14
159 17 6
47 71 86
0.003*
Extrathyroidal extension
Absent Present
257 114
69 31
121 68
47 60
136 46
53 40
0.025
Multiplicity
Absent Present
210 161
57 43
115 74
55 46
95 87
45 54
0.093
LNM
Absent Present
142 229
38 62
63 126
44 55
79 103
56 45
0.046
CLT
Absent Present
257 114
69 31
147 42
57 37
110 72
43 63
<0.001
Lymphatic invasion
Absent Present
368 3
99 1
187 2
51 67
181 1
49 33
1.000*
Perineural invasion
Absent Present
345 26
93 7
176 13
51 50
169 13
49 50
0.921
Blood vessel invasion
Absent Present
369 2
99 1
188 1
51 50
181 1
49 50
1.000*
pN
pN0 pN1a pN1b
157 173 41
42 47 11
70 93 26
45 54 63
87 80 15
55 46 37
0.060
AJCC stage
I II III IV
244 12 98 17
66 3 26 5
118 9 51 11
48 75 52 65
126 3 47 6
52 25 48 35
0.190
Ki67 labeling index
≤5 >5
325 44
88 12
167 22
51 50
158 22
49 50
0.863
Tg Ab level
Normal High
285 63
82 18
156 19
55 30
129 44
45 70
<0.001
Antimicrosomal Ab level
Normal High
289 58
83 17
156 19
54 33
133 39
46 67
0.003
* Fisher’s exact test. Ab, antibody; CLT, chronic lymphocytic thyroiditis; LNM, lymph node metastasis; Tg, thyroglobulin
BRAF IHC is positive in 86% of cases overall, 90% in the conventional type, and 60% in the follicular variant. BRAF RNA ISH is high in 70% overall, 71% in the conventional type, and 58% in the follicular variant. No significant association was noted between the presence of the BRAFV600E mutation and the age the patient. The tumor size ranged from 0.4 to 6.5 cm (mean: 1.0 cm; median: 0.8 cm) in patients carrying the mutation, and 0.4 to 2.8 cm (mean: 1.1 cm; median: 1.0 cm) in wild-type cases (P = 0.046). The BRAFV600E mutation was associated with the conventional subtype (P < 0.001), lymph node metastasis (P = 0.005), and pN stage (P = 0.012). BRAF V600E IHC was associated with both the conventional subtype (P < 0.001) and lymph node metastasis (P = 0.018). The clinicopathologic correlations of the BRAFV600E mutation and BRAF V600E IHC for all subjects are summarized in Table 1. Next, we evaluated the correlation between clinicopathologic factors and Ct level (Table 2). Lower Ct values were associated with larger (>2 cm) tumor size (P = 0.015), the conventional subtype (P = 0.003), extrathyroidal extension (P = 0.025), lymph node metastasis (P = 0.046), the absence of chronic lymphocytic
thyroiditis (P < 0.001), a normal Tg Ab level (P < 0.001), and a normal antimicrosomal Ab level (P = 0.003). Clinicopathologic correlations of the BRAF RNA ISH score were analyzed for subjects that were positive for the BRAFV600E mutation based on real-time PCR or BRAF IHC (Table 3). In patients with the BRAFV600E mutation on real-time PCR, higher RNA ISH scores were associated with younger age (P = 0.006), conventional type (P = 0.007), lymph node metastasis (P = 0.004), and higher pN stage (P = 0.010). A higher score in the BRAF RNA ISH was associated with younger age (P = 0.002), lymph node metastasis (P = 0.009) and higher pN stage (P = 0.013) in BRAF IHF positive cases. Intercorrelations among the BRAFV600E real-time PCR, BRAF V600E IHC, and BRAF RNA ISH in PTC BRAF V600E IHC staining showed significant association with the BRAFV600E real-time PCR (P < 0.001). Subgroup analysis according to the histologic type showed consistently significant association. BRAF RNA ISH, however, was not significantly associated with the BRAFV600E real-time PCR either overall or for the histologic subtypes, except for the follicular variant subtype
Please cite this article in press as: Y.Y. Jung, et al., Clinicopathologic correlations of the BRAFV600E mutation, BRAF V600E immunohistochemistry, and BRAF RNA in situ hybridization in papillary thyroid carcinoma, Pathol. – Res. Pract (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prp.2014.10.005
G Model
ARTICLE IN PRESS
PRP-51316; No. of Pages 9
Y.Y. Jung et al. / Pathology – Research and Practice xxx (2014) xxx–xxx
6
Table 3 Clinicopathologic correlations of BRAF RNA ISH with real-time PCR BRAFV600E mutant cases or BRAF IHC positive cases in PTC. BRAFV600E mutant (real-time PCR)
BRAF RNA ISH score
0–2
Total
3–4
BRAF IHC positive P
N
%
N
118
30
275
70
47 71
24 36
151 124
76 64
113 5
31 19
254 21
%
0–2
3–4
P
N
%
N
119
30
283
70
%
0.006
45 74
23 37
155 128
78 63
0.002
69 81
0.214
114 5
30 19
262 21
70 81
0.231
101 14 4
28 47 36
260 16 7
72 53 64
0.084*
Age
≤45 years >45 years
Size
≤2 cm >2 cm
Subtype
Conventional Follicular variant Others
99 15 4
28 56 40
257 12 6
72 44 60
0.007*
Extrathyroidal extension
Absent Present
89 29
33 24
181 94
67 76
0.060
89 30
32 24
189 94
68 76
0.113
Multiplicity
Absent Present
70 48
31 29
155 120
69 71
0.587
72 47
31 28
160 123
69 72
0.462
LNM
Absent Present
59 59
38 25
95 180
62 75
0.004
59 60
37 25
101 182
63 75
0.009
CLT
Absent Present
84 34
31 28
188 87
69 72
0.578
86 33
31 26
189 94
69 74
0.280
Lymphatic invasion
Absent Present
118 0
30 0
272 3
70 100
0.557*
119 0
30
280 3
70 100
0.558*
Perineural invasion
Absent Present
108 10
30 31
253 22
70 69
0.875
109 10
29 32
262 21
71 68
0.736
Blood vessel invasion
Absent Present
118 0
30 0
273 2
70 100
1.000*
118 1
30 33
281 2
70 67
1.000*
pN
pN0 pN1a pN1b
64 45 9
38 25 20
105 133 37
62 75 80
0.010
65 45 9
37 25 19
111 134 38
63 75 81
0.013
AJCC stage
I II III IV
80 6 28 4
31 46 27 22
179 7 75 14
69 54 73 78
0.463*
82 4 28 5
31 33 27 26
185 8 76 14
69 67 73 74
0.885*
Ki67 labeling index
≤5 >5
105 11
31 23
239 36
69 77
0.316
105 12
30 24
246 37
70 76
0.434
Tg Ab level
Normal High
88 23
29 34
212 45
71 66
0.466
91 21
30 31
215 46
70 69
0.795
Antimicrosomal Ab level
Normal High
90 20
30 32
214 42
70 68
0.678
90 21
30 31
215 46
70 69
0.766
* Fisher’s exact test. Ab, antibody; CLT, chronic lymphocytic thyroiditis; IHC, immunohistochemistry; ISH, in situ hybridization; LNM, lymph node metastasis; Tg, thyroglobulin.
(P = 0.035) (Table 4). No significant association was noted between BRAF V600E IHC and BRAF RNA ISH, either overall or for each histologic subtype (data not shown).
subtype. Conversely, the follicular variant showed higher specificity (70%) and NPV (80%) than conventional subtype.
Overlap of the BRAFV600E mutation by real-time PCR, BRAF V600E IHC, and BRAF RNA ISH in PTC
Discussion
A Venn diagram was generated, illustrating the overlap of cases of positive BRAFV600E mutation by real-time PCR, positive BRAF V600E immunostaining, and higher BRAF RNA ISH scores (score 3–4) (Fig. 3). A total of 264 (57%) of 467 subjects had positive results in all three; 109 (23%) were positive for the BRAFV600E mutation by real-time PCR and IHC, but negative for BRAF RNA ISH. We evaluated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of BRAF V600E IHC for the detection of the BRAFV600E mutation (Table 5). Overall, sensitivity was 95%, PPV was 93%, and accuracy was 90%. For the conventional type, sensitivity (96%), PPV (94%), and accuracy (91%) were all higher compared to the follicular variant
Our study showed that the BRAFV600E mutation was significantly associated with the conventional subtype of PTC and lymph node metastasis. Our findings were consistent with the previous notion that the BRAFV600E mutation is known to be an independent prognostic factor for recurrent and persistent disease, such as lymph node metastasis and advanced tumor stage [11]. Our results support that it can potentially be used as a predictor for poor clinical outcome and as a useful molecular marker for risk stratification in PTC patients [28]. Unlike in previous studies that have revealed an association between BRAFV600E mutation and greater tumor size [12], our study did not find an association between the BRAFV600E mutation and larger tumor size; however, lower Ct value correlated with larger tumor size.
Please cite this article in press as: Y.Y. Jung, et al., Clinicopathologic correlations of the BRAFV600E mutation, BRAF V600E immunohistochemistry, and BRAF RNA in situ hybridization in papillary thyroid carcinoma, Pathol. – Res. Pract (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prp.2014.10.005
G Model
ARTICLE IN PRESS
PRP-51316; No. of Pages 9
0.099 100 55 4 6 0 46 0 5 0.035 71 41 15 12 29 59 6 17 0.198 85 90 99 257 15 10 17 29 0.856 IHC, immunohistochemistry; ISH, in situ hybridization.
84 84 118 275 23 51 0–2 3–4 BRAF RNA ISH score
16 16
0 91 0 10 100 9 16 340 61 6% 31 93 20 373 69 7% 45 29 Negative Positive BRAF V600E IHC
%
%
P
<0.001
25 21
% N
39 94
<0.001
16 7
80 23
4 23
20 77
<0.001
4 1
% N % N
Wild type Mutant
N % N
Wild type
N
Mutant Wild type Mutant
N
Wild type
N
Conventional type Overall
Histologic subtype
Table 4 Correlation between the BRAFV600E mutation detected by BRAF V600E IHC and BRAF RNA ISH in PTC.
%
P
Follicular variant
%
P
Others
Mutant
P
0.001
Y.Y. Jung et al. / Pathology – Research and Practice xxx (2014) xxx–xxx
7
Our study revealed a higher frequency of the BRAFV600E mutation (84% overall, 89% in the conventional type, and 54% in the follicular variant) compared to previous studies. Similar to our results, other studies conducted with Korean populations also show a relatively high frequency of the BRAFV600E mutation (58–83%), compared to studies in other ethnic groups [32,33]. It was suggested that the BRAF mutation is especially involved in carcinogenesis in PTCs in Koreans [33]. Previously, the utility of IHC for the detection of the BRAFV600E mutation in various neoplasms has been reported for cutaneous melanoma, PTC, colorectal carcinoma, and lung adenocarcinoma [1,13,18,24]. Especially good reproducibility was reported for melanoma [19]. We evaluated the diagnostic utility of BRAF V600E IHC as a screening tool for detecting the BRAFV600E mutation. BRAF V600E IHC significantly correlates with the BRAFV600E mutation. It showed high sensitivity (95%) and accuracy (90%) for overall PTC cases, with higher sensitivity (96%) and accuracy (91%) for the conventional subtype, compared to follicular variant PTC. Using IHC decreases the turn-around-time for results and improves the cost effectiveness of BRAFV600E mutation analysis, when compared to PCR-based methods [1]. The diagnostic utility of BRAF V600E IHC was confirmed using surgically resected PTC tissue. In thyroid fine needle aspiration (FNA) specimen, molecular analysis for the BRAFV600E mutation has significant diagnostic value in cases of atypia of unknown significance (AUS) [22], and preoperative molecular testing can help distinguish between benign and malignant lesions [30]. In surgical specimen of PTC, the BRAFV600E mutation is reported as an independent predictor of central compartment lymph node metastasis [9]. The detection can be a cost-effective measure, as it bypasses the need for two-stage thyroidectomy [29]. The PCR-based assay for the BRAFV600E mutation is performed with cytological specimens when clinically indicated, but there is a long wait time for results. Instead, we propose IHC staining for BRAF V600E in the cell block of FNA specimen. Using immunostaining for BRAF V600E, combined with classical PTC markers, including HBME-1, CK19, and galectin-3, will aid rapid and accurate diagnosis in diagnostically difficult cases. Zimmermann et al. [31] validated BRAF V600E IHC in FNA biopsies of PTCs with high reliability. Although realtime PCR is the most accurate and reliable method, the shorter turn-around-time and low cost of BRAF V600E IHC makes it a worthwhile screening tool, especially on pre-operative cytology or core-biopsy. Recently, a novel RNA ISH technique for formalin-fixed paraffinembedded tissue was introduced and is currently under validation. Our study evaluated the clinical utility of BRAF RNA ISH for detection of the BRAFV600E mutation in PTCs. Using this method, gene expression information is obtained for tissues, and singlemolecules can be visualized in individual cells [27]. In contrast, real-time PCR lacks the gene expression measurement in tissue context and is prone to interference from unintended cell types. The diagnostic utility of RNA ISH has been validated for detection of high-risk HPV virus E6/E7 mRNA in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma [3,25], Her2 in gastric carcinoma [10], and EpCAM, CD44, and KRT17 in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma [5]. In our study, BRAF RNA ISH scores correlated with positive BRAF V600E IHC in the mutant group. However, it lacked suitability for a screening test. Although we did not obtain any statistically significant relevance between the PCR-based assay and RNA ISH, it is worth noting the significant association between the Ct value of the BRAFV600E mutation and the RNA ISH score. The Ct value reflects the number of cycles required for the fluorescent signal to cross the threshold, and it is inversely proportional to the amount of target nucleic acid in the sample. Thus, a lower Ct level means a higher amount of the target nucleic acid in the sample, indicating a strong positive reaction. Our study revealed that the lower Ct value significantly
Please cite this article in press as: Y.Y. Jung, et al., Clinicopathologic correlations of the BRAFV600E mutation, BRAF V600E immunohistochemistry, and BRAF RNA in situ hybridization in papillary thyroid carcinoma, Pathol. – Res. Pract (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prp.2014.10.005
G Model
ARTICLE IN PRESS
PRP-51316; No. of Pages 9
Y.Y. Jung et al. / Pathology – Research and Practice xxx (2014) xxx–xxx
8
Table 5 Diagnostic utility of BRAF V600E IHC for detection of the BRAFV600E mutation in PTC.
Total Conventional subtype Follicular variant
Prevalence (%)
Sensitivity (%)
Specificity (%)
PPV (%)
NPV (%)
Accuracy (%)
84 89 54
95 96 85
61 54 70
93 94 77
69 61 80
90 91 78
IHC, immunohistochemistry; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value.
correlated with the higher RNA ISH score, implying that high RNA ISH scores correlated with the relatively higher amounts of target gene. The higher RNA ISH score (score 3–4) was associated with younger age (P < 0.001), the conventional subtype (P = 0.008), and lymph node metastasis (P = 0.004). Thus, we predict that the correlated low Ct level and high RNA ISH score can be used to predict aggressive behavior, even after PTC diagnosis and confirmation of BRAF V600E mutation status. This finding proves that the RNA ISH score and the Ct value can be used as a predictor of poor prognosis and may be useful in treatment optimization for PTC patients. In conclusion, our study showed the clinical significance of the BRAFV600E mutation and the clinical usefulness of BRAF V600E IHC for detecting it. Moreover, we have found that lower Ct levels and high RNA ISH scores, which correlated with each other, were significantly associated with clinicopathologic features of poor prognosis. BRAF V600E IHC can be used as a screening test for the detection of the BRAFV600E mutation, and a high RNA ISH score may be used to predict a higher level of gene expression and aggressive behavior in PTCs. Acknowledgements This Research was supported by Chung-Ang University Research Grants in 2013. References [1] K. Affolter, W. Samowitz, S. Tripp, M.P. Bronner, BRAF V600E mutation detection by immunohistochemistry in colorectal carcinoma, Genes Chromosomes Cancer 52 (2013) 748–752. [2] S.K. Baek, K.Y. Jung, S.M. Kang, S.Y. Kwon, J.S. Woo, S.H. Cho, E.J. Chung, Clinical risk factors associated with cervical lymph node recurrence in papillary thyroid carcinoma, Thyroid 20 (2010) 147–152. [3] J.A. Bishop, X.J. Ma, H. Wang, Y. Luo, P.B. Illei, S. Begum, J.M. Taube, W.M. Koch, W.H. Westra, Detection of transcriptionally active high-risk HPV in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma as visualized by a novel E6/E7 mRNA in situ hybridization method, Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 36 (2012) 1874–1882. [4] H. Davies, G.R. Bignell, C. Cox, P. Stephens, S. Edkins, S. Clegg, J. Teague, H. Woffendin, M.J. Garnett, W. Bottomley, N. Davis, E. Dicks, R. Ewing, Y. Floyd, K. Gray, S. Hall, R. Hawes, J. Hughes, V. Kosmidou, A. Menzies, C. Mould, A. Parker, C. Stevens, S. Watt, S. Hooper, R. Wilson, H. Jayatilake, B.A. Gusterson, C. Cooper, J. Shipley, D. Hargrave, K. Pritchard-Jones, N. Maitland, G. Chenevix-Trench, G.J. Riggins, D.D. Bigner, G. Palmieri, A. Cossu, A. Flanagan, A. Nicholson, J.W. Ho, S.Y. Leung, S.T. Yuen, B.L. Weber, H.F. Seigler, T.L. Darrow, H. Paterson, R. Marais, C.J. Marshall, R. Wooster, M.R. Stratton, P.A. Futreal, Mutations of the BRAF gene in human cancer, Nature 417 (2002) 949–954. [5] Q. Du, W. Yan, V.H. Burton, S.M. Hewitt, L. Wang, N. Hu, P.R. Taylor, M.D. Armani, S. Mukherjee, M.R. Emmert-Buck, M.A. Tangrea, Validation of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma candidate genes from high-throughput transcriptomic studies, Am. J. Cancer Res. 3 (2013) 402–410. [6] S.B. F.A. Edge, D.R. Byrd, F.L. Greene, C.C. Compton, A. Trotti III (Eds.), AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, seventh ed., Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, 2009. [7] M.J. Garnett, R. Marais, Guilty as charged: B-RAF is a human oncogene, Cancer Cell 6 (2004) 313–319. [8] R. Hoshino, Y. Chatani, T. Yamori, T. Tsuruo, H. Oka, O. Yoshida, Y. Shimada, S. Ari-i, H. Wada, J. Fujimoto, M. Kohno, Constitutive activation of the 41-/43kDa mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathway in human tumors, Oncogene 18 (1999) 813–822. [9] G.M. Howell, M.N. Nikiforova, S.E. Carty, M.J. Armstrong, S.P. Hodak, M.T. Stang, K.L. McCoy, Y.E. Nikiforov, L. Yip, BRAF V600E mutation independently predicts central compartment lymph node metastasis in patients with papillary thyroid cancer, Ann Surg Oncol 20 (2013) 47–52. [10] H.J. Joo, S.S. Han, J.T. Kwon, E.S. Park, Y.Y. Jung, H.K. Kim, Epidural intracranial metastasis from benign leiomyoma: a case report with literature review, Clin. Neurol. Neurosurg. 115 (2013) 1180–1183.
[11] E. Kebebew, J. Weng, J. Bauer, G. Ranvier, O.H. Clark, Q.Y. Duh, D. Shibru, B. Bastian, A. Griffin, The prevalence and prognostic value of BRAF mutation in thyroid cancer, Ann. Surg. 246 (2007) 466–470 (Discussion 470-461). [12] S.J. Kim, K.E. Lee, J.P. Myong, J.H. Park, Y.K. Jeon, H.S. Min, S.Y. Park, K.C. Jung, H. Koo do, Y.K. Youn, BRAF V600E mutation is associated with tumor aggressiveness in papillary thyroid cancer, World J. Surg. 36 (2012) 310–317. [13] O. Koperek, C. Kornauth, D. Capper, A.S. Berghoff, R. Asari, B. Niederle, A. von Deimling, P. Birner, M. Preusser, Immunohistochemical detection of the BRAF V600E-mutated protein in papillary thyroid carcinoma, Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 36 (2012) 844–850. [14] J.H. Lee, E.S. Lee, Y.S. Kim, Clinicopathologic significance of BRAF V600E mutation in papillary carcinomas of the thyroid: a meta-analysis, Cancer 110 (2007) 38–46. [15] J.S. Lewis Jr., O.C. Ukpo, X.J. Ma, J.J. Flanagan, Y. Luo, W.L. Thorstad, R.D. Chernock, Transcriptionally-active high-risk human papillomavirus is rare in oral cavity and laryngeal/hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas – a tissue microarray study utilizing E6/E7 mRNA in situ hybridization, Histopathology 60 (2012) 982–991. [16] J.Y. Lim, S.W. Hong, Y.S. Lee, B.W. Kim, C.S. Park, H.S. Chang, J.Y. Cho, Clinicopathologic implications of the BRAF(V600E) mutation in papillary thyroid cancer: a subgroup analysis of 3130 cases in a single center, Thyroid 23 (2013) 1423–1430. [17] R.T. Liu, Y.J. Chen, F.F. Chou, C.L. Li, W.L. Wu, P.C. Tsai, C.C. Huang, J.T. Cheng, No correlation between BRAFV600E mutation and clinicopathological features of papillary thyroid carcinomas in Taiwan, Clin. Endocrinol. (Oxf.) 63 (2005) 461–466. [18] G.V. Long, J.S. Wilmott, D. Capper, M. Preusser, Y.E. Zhang, J.F. Thompson, R.F. Kefford, A. von Deimling, R.A. Scolyer, Immunohistochemistry is highly sensitive and specific for the detection of V600E BRAF mutation in melanoma, Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 37 (2013) 61–65. [19] C. Marin, A. Beauchet, D. Capper, U. Zimmermann, C. Julie, M. Ilie, P. Saiag, A. von Deimling, P. Hofman, J.F. Emile, Detection of BRAF p.V600E mutations in melanoma by immunohistochemistry has a good interobserver reproducibility, Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 138 (1) (2014) 71–75. [20] H.S. Min, G. Choe, S.-W. Kim, Y.J. Park, D.J. Park, Y.-K. Youn, S.H. Park, B.Y. Cho, S.Y. Park, S100A4 expression is associated with lymph node metastasis in papillary microcarcinoma of the thyroid, Mod. Pathol. 21 (2008) 748–755. [21] H. Nakayama, A. Yoshida, Y. Nakamura, H. Hayashi, Y. Miyagi, N. Wada, Y. Rino, M. Masuda, T. Imada, Clinical significance of BRAF (V600E) mutation and Ki67 labeling index in papillary thyroid carcinomas, Anticancer Res. 27 (2007) 3645–3649. [22] Y.E. Nikiforov, N.P. Ohori, S.P. Hodak, S.E. Carty, S.O. LeBeau, R.L. Ferris, L. Yip, R.R. Seethala, M.E. Tublin, M.T. Stang, C. Coyne, J.T. Johnson, A.F. Stewart, M.N. Nikiforova, Impact of mutational testing on the diagnosis and management of patients with cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules: a prospective analysis of 1056 FNA samples, J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 96 (2011) 3390–3397. [23] R.A. DeLellis, R.V. Lloyd, P.U. Heitz, C. Eng (Eds.), World Health Organization Classification of Tumors, Pathology and Genetics of Tumors of Endocrine Organs, IARC, Lyon, 2004. [24] H. Sasaki, S. Shimizu, Y. Tani, M. Shitara, K. Okuda, Y. Hikosaka, S. Moriyama, M. Yano, Y. Fujii, Usefulness of immunohistochemistry for the detection of the BRAF V600E mutation in Japanese lung adenocarcinoma, Lung Cancer 82 (2013) 51–54. [25] O.C. Ukpo, J.J. Flanagan, X.J. Ma, Y. Luo, W.L. Thorstad, J.S. Lewis Jr., High-risk human papillomavirus E6/E7 mRNA detection by a novel in situ hybridization assay strongly correlates with p16 expression and patient outcomes in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma, Am J Surg Pathol 35 (2011) 1343–1350. [26] P.T. Wan, M.J. Garnett, S.M. Roe, S. Lee, D. Niculescu-Duvaz, V.M. Good, C.M. Jones, C.J. Marshall, C.J. Springer, D. Barford, R. Marais, Mechanism of activation of the RAF-ERK signaling pathway by oncogenic mutations of B-RAF, Cell 116 (2004) 855–867. [27] F. Wang, J. Flanagan, N. Su, L.C. Wang, S. Bui, A. Nielson, X. Wu, H.T. Vo, X.J. Ma, Y. Luo, RNAscope: a novel in situ RNA analysis platform for formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues, J. Mol. Diagn. 14 (2012) 22–29. [28] M. Xing, W.H. Westra, R.P. Tufano, Y. Cohen, E. Rosenbaum, K.J. Rhoden, K.A. Carson, V. Vasko, A. Larin, G. Tallini, S. Tolaney, E.H. Holt, P. Hui, C.B. Umbricht, S. Basaria, M. Ewertz, A.P. Tufaro, J.A. Califano, M.D. Ringel, M.A. Zeiger, D. Sidransky, P.W. Ladenson, BRAF mutation predicts a poorer clinical prognosis for papillary thyroid cancer, J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 90 (2005) 6373–6379. [29] L. Yip, C. Farris, A.S. Kabaker, S.P. Hodak, M.N. Nikiforova, K.L. McCoy, M.T. Stang, K.J. Smith, Y.E. Nikiforov, S.E. Carty, Cost impact of molecular testing for indeterminate thyroid nodule fine-needle aspiration biopsies, J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 97 (2012) 1905–1912. [30] J. Zagzag, A. Pollack, L. Dultz, S. Dhar, J.B. Ogilvie, K.S. Heller, F.M. Deng, K.N. Patel, Clinical utility of immunohistochemistry for the detection of the
Please cite this article in press as: Y.Y. Jung, et al., Clinicopathologic correlations of the BRAFV600E mutation, BRAF V600E immunohistochemistry, and BRAF RNA in situ hybridization in papillary thyroid carcinoma, Pathol. – Res. Pract (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prp.2014.10.005
G Model PRP-51316; No. of Pages 9
ARTICLE IN PRESS Y.Y. Jung et al. / Pathology – Research and Practice xxx (2014) xxx–xxx
BRAF v600e mutation in papillary thyroid carcinoma, Surgery 254 (6) (2013) 1199–1204. [31] A.K. Zimmermann, U. Camenisch, M.P. Rechsteiner, B. Bode-Lesniewska, M. Rossle, Value of immunohistochemistry in the detection of BRAF mutations in fine-needle aspiration biopsies of papillary thyroid carcinoma, Cancer Cytopathol. 122 (1) (2014) 48–58.
9
[32] B.Y. Cho, et al., Changes in the clinicopathological characteristics and outcomes of thyroid cancer in Korea over the past four decades, Thyroid 23 (7) (2013) 797–804. [33] K.H. Kim, et al., Mutations of the BRAF gene in papillary thyroid carcinoma in a Korean population, Yonsei Med. J. 45 (5) (2004) 818–821.
Please cite this article in press as: Y.Y. Jung, et al., Clinicopathologic correlations of the BRAFV600E mutation, BRAF V600E immunohistochemistry, and BRAF RNA in situ hybridization in papillary thyroid carcinoma, Pathol. – Res. Pract (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prp.2014.10.005