BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
Vol. 139, No. 3, 1986
Pages 1195-1201
September 30, 1986
COENZYME A IN PURIFIED PEROXISOMES IS NOT FREELY SOLUBLE IN THE MATRIX BUT FIRMLY BOUND TO A MATRIX PROTEIN 1
Paul P. Van Veldhoven and @uy P. Mannaerts Afdeling Farmakologie, Katholieke Unive~iteit Leuven, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium Received July 30, 1986
SUMMARY: On subfractionation of purified rat liver peroxisomes in matrical, peripheral membrane, integral membrane and core protein fractions, the endogenous peroxisomal CoA was released together with the matrix proteins. The released CoA could not be measured by an enzymatic cycling assay unless the matrix proteins were denatured by acid treatment or by heating at alkaline pH. The cofactor could not be removed by dialysis of the matrix proteins unless salt was added. It was not displaced by exogenous CoA. It migrated into sucrose density gradients together with a protein of approximately 80 kDa. The results indicate that peroxisomal CoA is firmly bound to a matrix protein and that the presence of CoA inside purified peroxisomes does not necessarily imply that the peroxisomal membrane is impermeable to this cofactor. ® 1986AcademicPress, Inc.
In
the
course
characterization that
their
measurements on
Further
phospholipid
purified rat
the sucrose
demonstrated that of other
proteins
studies
permeable to
permeate through
laboratory, confirmed
variety (4).
membrane is
substrates easily
addition,
initial
on
the
biochemical
sucrose and
that the three
oxidases, known at that time, do not show latency, implying that
permeability our
their
of peroxisomes, de Duve and collaborators (1,2) established
the peroxisomal
peroxisomal
of
vesicles
indicated that
membrane. Direct
liver peroxisomes,
permeability of
conducted in
peroxisomes and, in
isolated peroxisomes are readily permeable to a
small molecules
permeability
the peroxisomal
such as
studies
reconstituted
on with
NAD* (3), CoA, ATP and carnitine
isolated
peroxisomes
peroxisomal
integral
and
on
membrane
the peroxisomal permeability to the above mentioned
This work was supported by 8rants from the Belgian 'Fonds voor Geneeskundig Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek' and the 'Onderzoeksfonds van de Katholieke Universiteit Leuven'. 0006-291X/86 $1.50 1195
Copyright © 1986 by Academic Press, lne. AII rights of reproduction in any Jorm reserved.
Vol. 139, No. 3, 1986
cofactors but
is not
by the
forming membrane
our
protein 2 (4). to
The
water
to small
nonselective soluble
membrane of
a nonseleetive
permeability
molecules
is
in
of
the
agreement
pore-
peroxisomal with
our
peroxisomes do not contain pyridine nucleotides,
carnitine (5), but it is difficult to reconcile with
the purified
CoA (6).
been considered
decided to
the peroxisomal
that purified
findings that
membrane we
small
nucleotides o r
unesterified has
mediated by the presence of specific membrane transloeases
presence in
observations adenine
BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
In fact, as evidence
organelles contain
significant amounts
of
the presence of CoA in purified peroxisomes for the
charged compounds
impermeability of the peroxisomal
(7). In order to solve the discrepancy
investigate the nature of the peroxisomal CoA pool in greater
detail. METHODS
Peroxisomes were purified from livers of male clofibrate-treated rats by a combination of differential centrifugation and isopycnic centrifugation in iso-osmotic self-generating Percoll gradients as described earlier (3). The purified peroxisomes were subfractionated by two procedures (4), which will be described in detail elsewhere 2. Procedure I consisted of the following successive treatments: two sonications in 10 mM 3-(N-morpholino)propanesulfonate buffer pH 7.2, containing I mM EDTA pH 7.2, I mM dithiothreitol and 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonylfluoride (buffer A), which released the soluble matrix proteins; treatment with I M NaCI, which released the peripheral membrane proteins; treatment with 1 % (w/v) Triton X-tO0 and with 1 % (w/v) Triton X-tO0 plus I M NaCl, which solubilized the integral membrane proteins. In procedure II the peroxisomes were first sonicated twice in 10 mM pyrophosphate buffer pH 9, containing I mM EDTA pH 9, I mM dithiothreitol and 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonylfluoride (buffer B), which released the soluble matrix proteins and the peripheral membrane proteins. The remaining membranes and cores were then treated with detergent and with detergent plus NaCl as described above, which solubilized the integral membrane proteins. Portions of the peroxisomal matrix proteins, released after sonication in buffer A, were placed in dialysis bags and dialyzed at room temperature against 100 volumes of buffer A, containin$ no additional salt or various amounts of NaCI. Aliquots were removed from the bags at different time points and analyzed for CoA. Peroxisomal proteins, released after sonication in buffer B, were concentrated by dialysis against solid polyethylene glycol 20 000 to a final concentration of 4 ms per ml. 2 ml were layered on top of a linear sucrose gradient [5-35 % (w/v) sucrose in buffer B; 38 ml] and centrifuged in a Beckman VTi 50 rotor for 12 hours at 167,000 g. Fractions of equal volume were collected and analyzed for their polypeptide pattern by sodium dodecyl sulfate gel eleetrophoresis and for their CoA content. Electrophoresis was performed in 10 to 20 % (w/v) acrylamide gradient slab gels with a 3 % (w/v) acrylamide stacking layer, as described by Laemmli (8). The gels were stained with Coomassie blue R (~).
2p.p. Van Veldhoven, W.W. Just and G.P. Mannaerts: manuscript submitted. 1196
Vol. 139, No. 3, 1986
BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
CoA present in purified peroxisomes and in subperoxisomal fractions was measured by a fluorimetric adaptation of the cycling assay of Veloso and Veech (10). This method measures the sum of unesterified CoA and acetyl-CoA. Since we have previously found that in purified peroxisomal fractions acetyl-CoA does not exceed 10-15 % of this sum (6), CoA and acetyl-CoA were not determined separately in the present experiments. CoA was measured on neutralized samples that had been deproteinized first with perchloric acid or heated at 70 ° for 20 min at pH 9.5 in the presence of 5 mM dithiothreitol. No difference in CoA content was found between acid- and base-treated samples, indicating the virtual absence of long chain acyl-CoA esters, which precipitate under acidic conditions and which are hydrolyzed under alkaline conditions. Catalase, urate oxidase, acyl-CoA oxidase, protein and phospholipids were determined as described previously (11,12). 3-Ketoacyl-CoA thiolase and carnitine octanoyltransferase were measured according to the method of Miyazawa et al. (13,14). 3-Hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase was measured as described by Purata et al. (15). RESULTS AND DISCUSSION When different matrix
purified rat
liver peroxisomes
constituents, most
enzymes (Table
of the
were subfractionated
CoA was
released
into
together
their
with
the
I), indicating a predominantly matrical localization.
Table I: Matrix localization of peroxisomal CoA. Purified peroxisomes were separated into their constituents by various successive treatments as described in Methods. Enzyme and CoA release were measured after each treatment. Results are expressed as percentage of total recovered activity or amount, and are means z S.E.M. for the number of experiments indicated in parentheses. The CoA content of purified whole peroxisomes was 0.70 ± 0.11 nmol/mg protein (n = 7). Acyl-CoA oxidase and 3-ketoacyl-CoA thiolase, two soluble matrix enzymes, followed the same pattern of release as catalase; the bulk of 3-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase, which behaves as a peripheral membrane protein, was released after NaCI treatment (procedure I) or after sonication in pyrophosphate buffer (procedure I I ) ; the bulk of phospholipids (membranes) was solubilized after detergent treatment; urate oxidase (cores) was not released (data not shown in the Table). T~EAT~NT
CATALAS"E
CoA
Release, ~ of Total Pl-oeedure I (n = 3) Sonication NaCl Triton X-100 Triton X-tOO + NaCl
85.7 3.0 9.4 0.6
-+ 1.7 t 0.7 z 1.5 -+ 0.1
69.4 11.7 13.3 1.7
+- 0.7 -+ 3.5 -+ 2.8 z 0.6
% Remainir~ % Recovery
0.4 +- 0.I 90.4 -+ 5.9
3.4 -+ 1.1 93.2 -+ 8.5
96.4 ± 2.7 3.3 ± 2.7 0.2 -+ 0.1
97.4 +- 0.8 0.7 -+ 0.4 0.3 -+ 0.1
0.2 + 0.I 104.9 ± 7.5
I .6 -+ 0.6 92.2 -+ 9. I
Procedure II (n = 4) Sonication, pyrophosphate Triton X-tO0 Triton X-tO0 + NaCI % Remaining % Recovery
1197
Vol. 139, No. 3, 1986
BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
100 - - ~ = ~ . -
~s 5o 5
200
~00
"
I000
Dialysis lime (minufes) Fig, I : Behavior of peroxisomal m a t r i x OoA during d i a l y s i s . Portions of peroxisomal matrix proteins released after sonication of purified peroxisomes in buffer A (see Methods), were placed in dialysis bags and dialyzed against 100 volumes of buffer A, containing no salt (II) or NaCI: 50 mM (A); 100 mM (@); 200 mM (~); 500 mM (W). At different time points aliquots were removed from the dialysis baEs and analyzed for CoA. The initial CoA content was I .22 nmol/mg matrix protein. Results are expressed as percentaEe of the initial amount.
The
denaturation treatment could in
n o t freely
cofactor is
of the
measured with
the absence
were
released matrix
the matrix,
proteins
however. Without prior
either
by
perchloric
acid
or by heating in the presence of dithiothreitol at alkaline pH, it
not be
bound,
soluble in
the employed enzymatic cycling assay. Moreover,
of salt it could not dialyzed, indicating that it was firmly
presumably to dialyzed in
a matrix
protein (Fig.
I). When
the matrix proteins
the presence
of increasing
salt concentrations,
CoA was
gradually
released, evoking the possibility that an electrostatic binding is
involved.
On separation
in
sucrose density gradients, CoA could not be found in the top fractions of
the
gradient, but
proteins
which
it migrated
assumes a
before diffused
8radient together
with the matrix
according to the method of McEwen (16), was 5.31 ± 0.44 S (n = 3),
corresponds to
proteins
into the
(Fig. 2). The sedimentation coefficient of the CoA binding protein,
estimated
one
of the matrix proteins by rate zonal centrifugation
a relative
spherical form
were first they were into the
molecular mass of approximately 80 kDa, if
for the
incubated with
centrifuged in
binding
exogenous
protein.
When
radioactively
the
matrix
labelled
CoA
the sucrose gradients, the radioactive CoA
gradients durin8
centrifugation, but 1198
it did not migrate
Vol. 139, No. 3, 1986
BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
ab 1
5
10
15
96 67 '7, ~3 ×
x
30 20."
14..~
B
10
"-.... i 5
10
15 Fraction
Fig. 2: Separation of peroxisomal proteins on sucrose density gradlents. Peroxisomal proteins, released after sonication of purified peroxisomes in buffer B, were concentrated as described in Methods. Before they were separated on sucrose density gradients, the concentrated proteins were divided into two portions, one of which was incubated for 30 min. at 4°C with 2 nmol [~H(G)] Coenzyme A (specific radioactivity: 4.5 Ci/mol) per mg protein. After centrifugation, the gradient fractions were analyzed for their polypeptide pattern (A) and for their CoA content (g). A: lane a: molecular weight markers; lane b: 150 ~g of total proteins released; lanes 1-16: proteins contained in 0.1 ml of The gradient fractions. Fractions I and 16 are the bottom and top fractions respectively. B, solid line: CoA content of the gradient, centrifuged in the absence of exogenous radioactive CoA. The CoA content of the fractions is expressed as percentage of the total CoA content of the gradient, which was 0.97 nmol/mg protein. Recovery of 0oA after centrifugation: 98 %. B, broken line: content of exogenously added radioactive CoA of the gradient, centrifuged in the presence of radioactive CoA. The content of exogenous radioactive CoA of the fractions is expressed as percentage of the total added radioactive CoA. Recovery: 101%.
together
with
exogenously did
the
added CoA
not exchange
pattern
of
and Since
of two
proteins
(Fig.
2).
This
indicates
that
the
did not bind to possibly unoccupied sites and that it
with the endogenous bound CoA. Analysis of the polypeptide
the
eleetrophoresis presence
matrix
gradient revealed
fractions
that
the
polypeptides with
one polypeptide 3-ketoacyl-CoA
by
sodium
presence
of
dodeeyl CoA
sulfate
coincided
gel
with
molecular masses of approximately
the
40 kDa
with a molecular mass of approximately 30 kDa (Fig. 2). thiolase
requires 1199
CoA
and
since
the
peroxisomal
Vol. 139, No. 3, 1986
thiolase
BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
is composed
of two subunits of 40 kDa (17), it is conceivable that
CoA
is associated
not
be detected after centrifugation, probably because of its lability (17).
CoA
did not
acyl-CoA
with this
migrate in
esters
gradients:
as
enzyme. Unfortunately, thiolase activity could
the gradients with the following enzymes, which use
substrate
acyl-CoA
and
oxidase,
whose
activity
3-hydroxyacyl-CoA
was
measured
dehydrogenase,
in
the
carnitine
octanoyltransferase (data not shown). Our
findings satisfactorily explain the presence of CoA inside purified
organelles,
whose membranes
significance,
if any, of the CoA binding is not clear, however. Since CoA is
released
from its
possible
that little
The
putative binding
noncovalent
and
surprisingly
low, since
most
of CoA likely
the presence of salt, it is
suggests that the nature of the binding is electrostatic.
The
dissociation
rate
is
the binding survived the long-lastin8 procedures of
purification and
centrifugation
protein in
or no CoA is bound to this protein in the intact cell.
salt-induced release
peroxisome
are readily permeable to CoA. The physiological
or dialysis.
subfractionation, followed The possibility
that CoA
by gradient density is covalently bound,
e.g.
as a glutamyl-CoA thiol ester enzyme intermediate as has been described
for
succinyl-CoA: 3-ketoacid CoA transferase (18), seems unlikely in view of
the
longevity of
the binding
at neutral
pH, its lability at acidic pH and
its lability in the presence of salt.
REFERENCES
I. de Duve, C., and Baudhuin, P. (1966) Physiol. Rev. 46, 323-357. 2. Baudhuin, P. (1969) Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 168, 2141228. 3. Van Veldhoven, P., Debeer, L.J., and Mannaerts, G.P. (1983) Biochem. J. 210, 685-693. 4. Van Veldhoven, P.P. (1986) Ph. Thesis, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium. 5. Mannaerts, 6.P., Van Veldhoven, P., Van Broekhoven A., Vandebroek, G., and Debeer, L.J. (1982) Biochem. J. 204, 17-23. 6. Van Broekhoven, A., Peeters, M.C., Debeer, L.J., and Mannaerts, G.P. (1981) Biochem. B i o p h y s . Res. Commun. 100, 305-312. 7. B o r s t , P. (1986) B i o c h i m . B i o p h y s . A e t a 866, 179-203. 8. Laemmli, V.K. (1970) N a t u r e 227, 680-685. 9. Bonner, W.M., and Laskey, R.A. (1974) Eur. J. Biochem. 46, 83-88. 10. Veloso, D., and Veech, R.L. (1975) in : Methods in E r ~ l o s y (Colowick, B.P., and Kaplan, N.O., eds.) vol. 35, pp. 273-278, Academic Press, New York. 1200
Vol. 139, No, 3, 1986
BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
11. Declereq, P.E., Haagsman, H.P., Van Veldhoven, P., Debeer, L.J., Van Golde, L.M.G., and Mannaerts, G.P. (1984) J. Biol. Chem. 259, 9064-9075. 12. Van Veldhoven, P., and Mannaerts, G.P. (1985) Bioehem. J. 227, 737-741. 13. Miyazawa, S., Osumi, T., and Hashimoto, T. (1980) Eur. J. Biochem. 103, 589-596. 14. Miyazawa, S., Ozasa, H., Osumi, T., and Hashimoto, T. (1983) J. Bioehem. 94, 529-542. 15. Furata, S., Miyazawa, S., Osumi, T., Hashimoto, T. and Li, N. (1980) J. Bioehem. BB, 1059-1070. 16. McEwen, C.R. (1967) Anal. Biochem. 20, 114-119. 17. Miyazawa, S., Furata, S., Osumi, T., Hashimoto, T., and Li, N. (I781) J. Bioehem. 90, 511-517. 18. Solomon, F., and Jencks, W.P. (1969) J. Biol. ~hem. 244, 1079-1081.
1201