Collisionless periodic orbits in the free-fall three-body problem

Collisionless periodic orbits in the free-fall three-body problem

Accepted Manuscript Collisionless periodic orbits in the free-fall three-body problem Xiaoming Li, Shijun Liao PII: DOI: Reference: S1384-1076(18)30...

1012KB Sizes 0 Downloads 50 Views

Accepted Manuscript

Collisionless periodic orbits in the free-fall three-body problem Xiaoming Li, Shijun Liao PII: DOI: Reference:

S1384-1076(18)30245-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newast.2019.01.003 NEASPA 1254

To appear in:

New Astronomy

Received date: Revised date: Accepted date:

16 August 2018 26 January 2019 31 January 2019

Please cite this article as: Xiaoming Li, Shijun Liao, Collisionless periodic orbits in the free-fall threebody problem, New Astronomy (2019), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newast.2019.01.003

This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1 HIGHLIGHTS

• The 313 new families of periodic orbits of free-fall three-body problem are gained; • A new numerical strategy, namely the clean numerical simulation (CNS), is used;

AC

CE

PT

ED

M

AN US

CR IP T

• The generalized Keplers third law is confirmed;

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 2

Collisionless periodic orbits in the free-fall three-body problem Xiaoming Li1 and Shijun Liao1,2,3∗ Centre of Advanced Computing, School of Naval Architecture, Ocean and Civil Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China 2 School of Physics and Astronomy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China 3 Ministry-of-Education Key Laboratory in Scientific and Engineering Computing, Shanghai 200240, China * The corresponding author: [email protected]

CR IP T

1

AN US

Abstract Although the free-fall triple system has been numerically studied for more than one century, however, only four collisionless periodic orbits have been found. In this paper, using a supercomputer and a new strategy for chaotic dynamic systems, called “clean numerical simulation” (CNS), we successfully gained 316 collisionless periodic orbits of the free-fall triple system with a few chosen values of mass ratios, including three collisionless periodic orbits which were found before. Especially, 313 collisionless free-fall periodic orbits are entirely new. What’s more, we can gain periodic free-fall three-body orbits in a random ratio of mass. Thus, this is a good example to prove that there exist an infinite number of periodic solutions for the triple system. In addition, it is found that, for a given ratio of mass, there exists a generalized Kepler’s third law for the periodic three-body system. All of these would enrich our knowledge and deepen our understanding about the famous three-body problem as a whole. Key Words three-body system; periodic orbits; celestial mechanics; chaos.

INTRODUCTION

M

I.

AC

CE

PT

ED

The three-body problem was first studied by Newton [1], and attracted many famous mathematicians and physicists such as Euler [2], Lagrange [3] and so on. Poincar´e [4] found that solutions of three-body problem are rather sensitive to initial conditions. His discovery of the so-called “sensitivity dependance on initial conditions” (SDIC) laid the foundation for chaos theory. It well explains why in three hundred years only three families of periodic solutions of three-body system were discovered. These three families of periodic orbits are the Euler-Lagrange family [2, 3], the ˇ Broucke-Hadjidemetriou-H´enon family of periodic orbits [5–9] and the figure-eight orbit [10, 11]. In 2013 Suvakov and Dmitraˇsinovi´c [12] found 13 new periodic three-body orbits by means of numerical methods. In recent years, periodic three-body problem have been paid much attention [13–17]. Especially, Li and Liao [15] presented more than six hundred new periodic solutions of triple system with equal mass, and Li et al. [16] further reported more than 1000 new periodic solutions of triple system in case of unequal mass, mainly because they can accurately simulate orbits of chaotic triple systems by using a new numerical strategy, i.e. clean numerical simulation (CNS) [18–23]. The detailed results of these orbits are given on the website http://numericaltank.sjtu.edu.cn/three-body/three-body.htm. The initial conditions of the newly-found periodic orbits [12–16] are isosceles collinear configurations. However, these is another configuration, called the free-fall three-body problem with the zero initial velocities and arbitrary ratios of masses, which have been numerically investigated for more than one century. The free-fall triple system is also called Pythagorean problem, which was first numerically studied by Burrau [24]. Its first periodic orbit with a binary collision was found by Szebehely and Peters [25]. Its first collisionless periodic orbit was found by Standish [26]. In 1990s Tanikawa and his colleagues [27, 28] reported some collision solutions of free-fall triple system. Moeckel et al. [29] proved the existence of periodic brake three-body orbits (i.e., periodic free-fall three-body orbits) with collision in the isosceles configuration. Tanikawa and Mikkola [30] gained the periods and initial conditions of some periodic free-fall three-body orbits with collision. Yasko and Orlov [31] found three collisionless periodic orbits while searching periodic free-fall three-body orbits. Orlov et al. [32] investigated periodic solutions of the free-fall three-body system with equal mass. In summary, so far, only four collisionless periodic solutions for free-fall three-body system have been found. In this paper, we gain 316 collisionless periodic orbits for free-fall three-body system with different mass ratios by means of the clean numerical simulation (CNS) [18–23], including the periodic orbit found by Standish [26] and two periodic orbits found by Yasko and Orlov [31]. Especially, 313 collisionless free-fall periodic orbits are entirely new.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AN US

CR IP T

3

FIG. 1. The initial position of three bodies in the configuration space. The initial positions of body-1 and body-2 are located at points A (−0.5, 0) and B (0.5, 0), respectively. And the initial position of body-3 is replaced at the point C (x, y) in the region D.

II.

NUMERICAL APPROACH OF SEARCHING FOR PERIODIC ORBITS

r¨i =

M

In this paper, we consider the planar Newtonian three-body problem. The differential equations of the three-body problem are 3 X

ED

j=1,j6=i

Gmj (rj − ri ) , i = 1, 2, 3 |ri − rj |3

(1)

AC

CE

PT

where ri and mi are the position and mass of the ith body (i = 1, 2, 3), G is the Newtonian constant of gravitation. Without loss of generality, we assume G = 1 here. Let us consider planar three-body problem with zero initial velocities and arbitrary ratios of masses. As shown in Figure 1, the initial locations of body-1 and body-2 are at points A (−0.5, 0) and B (0.5, 0), respectively, and the initial position of body-3 is at the point C (x, y) in the region D which is surrounded by the x and y axes and a circular segment of unit radius with the point A (-0.5,0) as the centre. Agekyan and Anosova [33] demonstrated that all possible initial condition configurations for planar free-fall triple system are included in the region D. Their excellent work greatly simplifies the considered problem. Without loss of generality, let the Newtonian gravitation constant be equal to one. Because the initial positions of body-1 and body-2 are fixed at point (−0.5, 0) and (0.5, 0), respectively, and the initial position (x, y) of body-3 determines the orbit of free-fall triple system. Here we denote y(t)=(r1 (t), r2 (t), r3 (t), r˙ 1 (t), r˙ 2 (t), r˙ 3 (t)), where ri and r˙ i (t) are the positions and velocities of the body-i (i=1,2,3), respectively. The periodic orbits will return to initial condition y(T ) = y(0) at the time t = T , where T is the period. We locate the periodic free-fall three-body orbits by finding zeros of the function v u 3 3 uX X ||y(t) − y(0)|| = t [ri (t) − ri (0)]2 + [r˙ i (t) − r˙ i (0)]2 (2) i=1

i=1

Here we used the same strategy as that in our previous discovery of more than 2000 new periodic orbits of threebody system [15, 16]. First, we scan the initial positions (x, y) of body-3 in region D with steps of ∆x = ∆y = 0.0001. We employ the ODE solver dop853 [34] to numerically solve the differential equations of the free-fall triple system. The approximate initial conditions and periods are selected when the function (2) is below 0.05. Second, we use the Newton-Raphson method [35–37] to modify these approximate initial conditions (x, y) and the periods T . However,

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 4 since some periodic three-body solutions might be lost by conventional numerical method with double precision, we now solve the differential equations of the three-body problem by using “clean numerical simulation” (CNS) [18– 23]. The CNS is based on the arbitrary order of Taylor series method [38–40] in arbitrary precision [41, 42], and a convergence verification by means of another simulation with even smaller numerical noises. A periodic free-fall three-body orbit is obtained when the function (2) is less than 10−6 . The detail of numerical strategy is shown in ref. [15, 16].

III.

RESULTS

CE

PT

ED

M

AN US

CR IP T

We consider the periodic orbits are collisionless if the minimum distance between the bodies is greater than 10−6 in the whole period. We focused our numerical search on collisionless periodic orbits for free-fall triple system with period less than 200 and minimum distance between the bodies greater than 10−6 . Similarly as we did before [15, 16], we use a topological method [43, 44] to classify the periodic orbits. There are two three-body relative coordinate vectors ρ = √12 (r1 − r2 ) and λ = √16 (r1 + r2 − 2r3 ). With these two vectors, the positions of three-body system can be mapped to a point on a unit space sphere, and the Cartesian components of the point are   2ρ · λ λ2 − ρ2 2(ρ × λ) · ez n = (nx , ny , nz ) = , , , (3) R2 R2 R2 p where R = ρ2 + λ2 . There are three singular points (punctures) in the space sphere, corresponding to the three binary collision in the real space. A collisionless periodic orbit gives a closed curve around three punctures on the shape sphere. With one puncture as the north pole, the points of the sphere can be mapped to the plane with the other two punctures by a stereographic projection. Then a close curve on the shape sphere can be mapped to a plane with two punctures. The free group words a and b represent a clockwise around the right-hand-side puncture and counterclockwise turn around the left-hand-side puncture, respectively. The letters A and B denote the opposite direction of a and b, respectively. The so-called “free group elements” of periodic orbits w can be written as w = w1 w2 w3 ..., where wi is any one of a, b, A and B. Two periodic orbits on the shape sphere are shown in Fig. 2. The free group elements of F1 (1, 0.8, 0.8) and F3 (1, 0.8, 0.2) is BaBbAb and BabBAb, respectively.

AC

FIG. 2. The shape sphere of two periodic orbits: (a) F1 (1, 0.8, 0.8) and (b) F3 (1, 0.8, 0.2).

We found 30 collisionless periodic orbits in the free-fall triple system with equal mass (m1 = m2 = m3 = 1). Table S I in ref. [45] contains the periods and initial conditions of these periodic orbits. Their free group elements are given in Table S VIII in ref. [45]. In addition, we also gained collisionless periodic free-fall solutions of triple system in some cases of unequal masses, as shown in Table I. In summary, we totally found 316 collisionless periodic orbits in the free-fall triple system with different mass ratios. The periods and initial conditions of the periodic solutions are displayed in Tables S I-VII in ref. [45], and their free group elements are given in Tables S VIII-XIII in ref. [45]. The animation of these periodic orbits are provided on the website: http://numericaltank.sjtu.edu.cn/free-fall-3b/free-fall-3b.htm. The periodic orbit F1 (0.6, 0.8, 1) is the one found by Standish [26]. The periodic orbits F1 (1, 1, 1) and F2 (1, 1, 1) are the ones named Oribt 16 and 17 in Yasko et al. [31], respectively. Except for these three periodic orbits, 313 collisionless periodic free-fall three-body orbits are newly-found. Note that the periodic orbit named Orbit 19 in ref. [31] is not found in this paper, because the initial condition of that orbit is not in the region-D considered in this paper.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 5 of periodic orbits with different masses. m3 number of periodic orbits 1 30 0.8 29 0.6 69 0.4 44 0.2 32 1 30 0.267 15 0.662 19 0.01 48

CR IP T

TABLE I. The number m1 m2 1 1 1 0.8 1 0.8 1 0.8 1 0.8 0.6 0.8 1 0.412 0.393 0.288 1 0.1

TABLE II. The initial conditions and periods T of the new collisionless periodic free-fall orbits in the case of r1 (0) = (−0.5, 0), r2 (0) = (0.5, 0), r3 (0) = (x, y), r˙ 1 (0) = r˙ 2 (0) = r˙ 3 (0) = (0, 0) and the Newtonian constant of gravitation G = 1. x 0.3089693008 0.0009114239 0.1527845023 0.129088109 0.083924021 0.1310631652

y 0.4236727692 0.3019805958 0.068494294 0.4010761427 0.3307729197 0.3036588095

AN US

Fi (m1 , m2 , m3 ) F10 (1, 1, 1) F1 (1, 0.8, 0.8) F24 (1, 0.8, 0.8) F5 (1, 0.8, 0.6) F27 (1, 0.8, 0.4) F6 (1, 0.8, 0.2)

(b)F1(1, 0.8, 0.8)

0.3 0.4

0.2 0.1

y

y

0.2

0.0

0.0

0.1

ED

−0.1

−0.2

(c)F24(1, 0.8, 0.8)

0.2

y

0.4

M

(a)F10(1, 1, 1) 0.6

T 4.8914942162 1.8286248401 7.5001089956 2.500764871 5.3174336486 2.9464698551

0.0

−0.1

−0.2 −0.3

−0.2

0.0

0.2

x

PT

(d)F5(1, 0.8, 0.6) 0.4 0.3

CE

y

0.2

AC

x

0.0

x

0.2

0.4

−0.4

(e)F27(1, 0.8, 0.4)

−0.2

0.0

x

0.2

0.4

(f)F6 (1, 0.8, 0.2) 0.3

0.4 0.2

0.2 0.1

0.0

−0.1

−0.4

−0.1

−0.2

0.0

−0.2

0.0

−0.4

−0.2

0.0

0.1

−0.6

−0.2

−0.4

0.4

y

−0.4

y

−0.4

0.2

0.4

−0.6

−0.2

−0.4

−0.2

0.0

x

0.2

0.4

−0.4

−0.2

0.0

x

0.2

0.4

FIG. 3. (color online.) The trajectories of six new collisionless periodic orbits in the free-fall three-body problem. Blue line: body-1, red line: body-2, black line: body-3.

A few cases of mass ratio listed in Table II are considered here. Note that we find 19 collisionless periodic orbits with masses m1 = 0.393, m2 = 0.288 and m3 = 0.662 which are randomly generated between 0 and 1. Therefore, theoretically speaking, we can gain collisionless periodic solutions of the free-fall three-body system in arbitrary ratio of mass. What’s more, we obtain 48 collisionless periodic orbits even with large mass ratio (i.e. m1 = 1, m2 = 0.1 and m3 = 0.01). So, theoretically speaking, the number of periodic solutions of the free-fall three-body system is infinite. All bodies of these periodic orbits have zero velocities at time t = T /2, where T is the period. After t = T /2, the three bodies will go back to the initial positions along the original trajectories. For example, the periods and

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 6 initial conditions of six newly-found collisionless periodic free-fall three-body orbits are presented in Table II, and their trajectories are shown in Figure 3. So, it seems that all periodic trajectories of the free-fall three-body system are not closed. This is quite different from the periodic solutions of triple system with nonzero initial velocities.

2

1

0.5

0

0.2

0.4

m3

0.6

0.8

CR IP T

T*/Lf

1.5

AN US

FIG. 4. (color online).The scale-invariant average period T ∗ /Lf = T |E|3/2 /Lf versus m3 in case of m1 = 1 and m2 = 0.8. Symbols: computed results; line: T ∗ /Lf = 1.912m3 + 0.084.

PT

ED

M

Li and Liao [15] found that the periodic solutions with equal mass and initial conditions with isosceles collinear configurations have scale-invariant average period T¯∗ = (T /Lf )|E|3/2 ≈ 2.433, where T , Lf and E are the period, the number of letter of free group word, total energy of the system, respectively. For the collisionless free-fall periodic orbits with equal mass (m1 = m2 = m3 = 1) found in this paper, the scale-invariant average period T¯∗ ≈ 2.363, is close to 2.433 with error of 3%. The results imply that the scale-invariant average period of these periodic orbits with equal mass (m1 = m2 = m3 = 1) is approximate to a universal constant for different configurations, which are considered as generalized Kepler’s third law for the periodic three-body system [15, 16, 46] . For periodic orbits with unequal mass and initial conditions with isosceles collinear configurations, Li et al. [16] found that the scale-invariant average period grows linearly with m3 in case of m1 = m2 = 1. In this paper, for periodic free-fall orbits with m1 = 1 and m2 = 0.8, scale-invariant average period is 1.663, 1.191, 0.776 and 0.527 for m3 = 0.8, 0.6, 0.4 and 0.2, respectively. It is also found that the scale-invariant average period grows linearly with m3 , as shown in Figure 4. This confirms again that these should exist a generalized Kepler’s third law for the periodic three-body system.

IV.

CONCLUSIONS

AC

CE

Although the free-fall triple system have been numerically studied for more than one century, however, only four collisionless periodic orbits have been found. In this paper, we report 316 collisionless periodic solutions of the free-fall triple system with a few mass ratios, including the periodic orbit found by Standish [26] and two periodic orbits found by Yasko et al. [31]. Especially, 313 periodic orbits are entirely new. It should be emphasized that we can gain periodic solutions of the free-fall three-body system in random ratio of mass so that there should exist an infinite number of periodic orbits of the free-fall triple system. In addition, it is found that, in case of a randomly given ratio of mass, there always exists a generalized Kepler’s third law for the periodic free-fall three-body system. All of these would enrich our knowledge and deepen our understanding about the famous three-body problem as a whole.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Thanks to the anonymous referees for their valuable comments and discussions. This work was carried out on TH-2 at the National Supercomputer Centre in Guangzhou, China. It is partly supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Approval No. 91752104).

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 7 CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. REFERENCE

CE

PT

ED

M

AN US

CR IP T

I. Newton, London: Royal Society Press (1687). L. Euler, Novo Comm. Acad. Sci. Imp. Petrop. 11, 144 (1767). J.-L. Lagrange, Prix de lacad´emie royale des Sciences de paris 9, 292 (1772). J. H. Poincar´e, Acta Math. 13, 1 (1890). R. Broucke, Celestial Mechanics 12, 439 (1975). J. D. Hadjidemetriou, Celestial Mechanics 12, 255 (1975). J. D. Hadjidemetriou and T. Christides, Celestial mechanics 12, 175 (1975). M. H´enon, Celestial mechanics 13, 267 (1976). M. H´enon, Celestial mechanics 15, 243 (1977). C. Moore, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 3675 (1993). A. Chenciner and R. Montgomery, Annals of Mathematics 152, 881 (2000). ˇ M. Suvakov and V. Dmitraˇsinovi´c, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 114301 (2013). P. P. Iasko and V. V. Orlov, Astronomy Reports 58, 869 (2014). ˇ M. Suvakov, Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy 119, 369 (2014). X. Li and S. Liao, Sci. China - Phys. Mech. Astron. 60, 129511 (2017). X. Li, Y. Jing, and S. Liao, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan 70, 64 (2018). ˇ ˇ M. Sindik, A. Sugita, M. Suvakov, and V. Dmitraˇsinovi´c, Phys. Rev. E 98, 060101 (2018). S. Liao, Tellus A 61, 550 (2009). S. Liao, Chaos Solitons & Fractals 47, 1 (2013). S. Liao, Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation 19, 601 (2014). S. Liao and P. Wang, Sci. China - Phys. Mech. Astron. 57, 330 (2014). S. Liao and X. Li, Int. J. Bifurcation & Chaos 25, 1530023 (11 page) (2015). Z. L. Lin, L. P. Wang, and S. J. Liao, Sci. China - Phys. Mech. Astron. 60, 014712 (2017). C. Burrau, Astronomische Nachrichten 195, 113 (1913). V. Szebehely and C. F. Peters, Astronomical Journal (1967). E. Standish, Giacaglia G.E.O. (eds) Periodic Orbits, Stability and Resonances. Springer, Dordrecht (1970). K. Tanikawa, H. Umehara, and H. Abe, Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy 62, 335 (1995). K. Tanikawa, Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy 76, 157 (2000). R. Moeckel, R. Montgomery, and A. Venturelli, Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis 204, 1009 (2012). K. Tanikawa and S. Mikkola, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan 67, 115 (2015). P. P. Yasko and V. V. Orlov, Astronomy Reports 59, 404 (2015). V. V. Orlov, V. A. Titov, and L. A. Shombina, Astronomy Reports 60, 1083 (2016). T. A. Agekyan and Z. P. Anosova, Soviet Physics - Astronomy 11, 1006. E. Hairer, S. P. Nørsett, and G. Wanner, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg (1993). S. C. Farantos, Journal of Molecular Structure: THEOCHEM 341, 91 (1995). M. Lara and J. Pelaez, Astronomy and Astrophysics 389, 692 (2002). A. Abad, R. Barrio, and A. Dena, Phys. Rev. E 84, 016701 (2011). D. Barton, I. Willem, and R. Zahar, Comput. J. 14, 243 (1971). G. Corliss and Y. Chang, ACM Trans. Math. Software 8, 114 (1982). R. Barrio, F. Blesa, and M. Lara, Computers & Mathematics with Applications 50, 93 (2005). P. Oyanarte, Computer Physics Communications 59, 345 (1990). D. Viswanath, Physica D 190, 115 (2004). R. Montgomery, Nonlinearity 11, 363 (1998). ˇ M. Suvakov and V. Dmitraˇsinovi´c, American Journal of Physics 82, 609 (2014). see supplementary material. ˇ V. Dmitraˇsinovi´c and M. Suvakov, Physics Letters A 379, 1939 (2015).

AC

[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [28] [29] [30] [31] [32] [33] [34] [35] [36] [37] [38] [39] [40] [41] [42] [43] [44] [45] [46]