Nucleiul'bysicsA446(1985)431c436c North-Holland,Anmterdam
431c
COLOUR DIELECTRICS - A WAY TO UNDERSTAND QUARK BAGS
Hans J. PIRNER TheoreticalPhysics Division, CERN, 1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland
We discuss the colour dielectric model which introduces as new effective variable the colour dielectric field for quark confinement. The model may be constructed from the QCD action and leads to the very successful bag model of hadrons. It allows to calculate the change of nucleon properties in nuclei which the EMC effect indicates.
1. CALCULATING THE BAG FROM LATTICE GAUGE THEORY Everybody
is
familiar
with
dielectrics
from
its
first course
in
electrodynamics. A macroscopic amount of matter has of the order of 1O23 charges in it, therefore it is impractical to solve the Maxwell's equations from the charge and current distributionsof all these charges. It is better to introduce a dielectric constant characterizingthe medium. In QCD not only the quarks have colour charges but also the gluons carry colour. So even vacuum will have a colour dielectric field. From the macroscopicHamiltonian
it is easily seen that colour displacement fields+Diand magnetic fieldsf, cannot subsist in a medium where E = 0, because the energy associatedwith them would be infinite. The vacuum therefore has E = 0. The dynamics of confinement is reduced to find the value of the dielectric field in every point in space around the colour charges. The region with E = 0 forms a bag around the E = 1 region inside of the hadron, where colour is present and not influenced by large scale vacuum fluctuations. The colour dielectric model132 proposes a local order parameter x(x) which is related to the dielectric constant E as E = x4 and can be calculated by averages over the gluon charges in a small volume L4:
0375-9474/85/%
[email protected]. (North-HollandPhysicsPublishingDivision)
Qn the lattice with a lattice constanr:a, one starts with a11 Wilson loops which fit into a box I4 = (28)' and paas through xC. From the mcnrents
gioea
A dxp one i @ reconsCructsthe effective aeCion of the x-field given by a Wnetic term and a by
the -tntegral over all link variablea Urf = exp If,“j
fourth order polynomial potential U(x)
Note after the first averaging sCep
$ 0, so one has Co xesrart the procedure by calculating the mome*Co
for
a larger
cell
of size f2L)4 * f4af4‘ * 0.2 GeV. The QCU whether confinement Pavours surface
Hopefully, this procedure converges fast when 1fnl-t h sffective potential U(x) datermines) e.g.,
dominated (SLAC) or volume (MIT) bag solutions. In the effective Lagrangian also Che quarks can be included wing local gauge invariance.I do not know how Co J.nCegrateout the quark fields+ When the scale size becomes vary large, probably choral fields %(x) and S(X) should be considered. The success of quenched QGD calculationsattributesa less important r&e to Chess fields. The effectfve Lagranglan of the cofour-dielectricmodel is:
and mq as current mass. The effecCive potentialIi(x)- 0 at x J 0 snd can be expanded as
H.J. Pirner / Colour dielectrics
3 awaX* 1
U(x) = The mass
mGB
correlation Before in
x2
x=o
O+ bound
state in pure gluon theory is given by the
length of the x field in the effective Lagrangian.
discussing
relation
experimental
to the others
dielectric
model
bag models
0; x2-
=f+,
of lightest
433c
consequences
mentioned
a
dynamical
field
soliton model.
to
describe
let me place it
Of course,
the colour
like the MIT and cloudy
is closest to the other bag models3,
and the non-topological
introduces
of this model,
in this meeting.
In contrast
confinement
to the first, it
and
can
be
used
in
scattering calculations. It is very similar to the Friedberg-Lee soliton 4 model , the main difference consists in the coupling of the soliton field. In the colour current
dielectric
quark
Friedberg-Lee negative colour
mass
model the effective quark mass mq/x is identical
inside
model
the
the bag
quark
mass
(x=1) is
and
large
infinite outside
outside
of the bag -1
inside. This last feature does not go well with asymptotic
dielectric
theory,
one can calculate
the string
tension,
to the
(x=0). In the GeV and
freedom. In once U(x) is
given. One also obtains the profile of the string, which in the strong coupling models
is
infinitely
indication
thin.
for collective
dynamical
confinement
In
spectroscopy,
bag motion5
the
Roper
resonance
gives
an
. Fake six-quark states disappear when
is taken into account for NN-scattering6.
2. TESTING THE BAG INSIDE AND OUTSIDE OF THE NUCLEUS There hadrons
has been
to
relation
description calculates
deep
sea
separates
outside change effects depths inflated
The
important
inelastic
helps
to avoid
quark
colour-dielectric
colour
a lot of fine work' with regard to low energy properties of
in bag models.
scattering
feature of the quark bag model is its 8 . Hopefully a translational invariant
the infinities'
distributions.
The
model are essentially
the inside I = 1 region
of the static bag model, when one
valence
quark
distributions
given by the confinement
from x = 0 outside
in
the
radius, which
for a free nucleon.
The
dielectric
field in nuclear matter, however, changes to x * 0.02 # 0 N of the bag and lets the quarks tunnel outside of the nucleon bags. The
of the x-vacuum
costs
energy,
the quark
tunnelling
wins
energy,
together make the nucleon bound in the nucleus. The effective UN
of a nucleon
nucleon
in the nucleus
can be related. We
results of the following Table.
and the rms confinement
find, using
the formulas
both
potential
radius of the
of Ref.
2, the
H.J. Pirner / colour dielectrfes
434C
He3
A
I
Be9
Cl*
I
Pe56
AU197
J [fml
0.655
0.658
0.695
0.746
0.805
XN
0.0073
0.0076
0.0116
0.016
0.020
‘N
lMevl -15.5
z [MeV]
-16.1
-24.6
-33.9
-42.4
-17
-25
-36" (Ni=)
-44*
(Li6) pth (x-0.62)
1.05
1.05
1.02
pexp
1.09
1.06
1.05
1
(Pb*O*)
1
0.97
1
0.95
10 The shift g of the quasi-elastic peak in electron scattering should be compared
to the theoretical potential depth WN. A change of the quark 11 distributions in the nucleus is directly shown in the EXC and SLAC results .
At x = 0.62, the ratios p - F2(x,Q2,A)/F2(~,Q2,Fe) xIo 62 are given in the last
I
.
two rows of the Table. They are calculated with a scaling violation parameter b = -0.25 and
is correct. Nucleons with their centres closer than deform
clusters and thereby the confinement size also increases. If we calculate for all the nuclei the modified confinementsize as a function of dc and then fit to the SLAC data, we find d
C
= 1.3 fm as critical centre-centredistance. At
this dc the average probabilitiesfor a n-quark cluster in Fes6 are pB = 45X, p6 = 201, 4 = 11% and p12+p15+... = 24%. Certainly a calculation based on six-quark clusters alone can be quite misleading. In fact we interpret these high cluster probabilities as an indication that with Increasing effective radius of the nucleon, the quarks percolate through the nucleus and the nucleus becomes colour-conductingas proposed in Ref. 12. Experiments at large Q* make other models than the quark model an academic exercise.
The
Skyrme model would have to include an infinity of mesons to
obtain scaling. At low energy, the bag models are less predictive. I expect, however, a qualitative description of the transition from low to high density nuclear
matter.
The leakage of colour given by xN = 0.02 in the colour
L. Wilets/ Quark-solitonmodel of nucleon structure
dielectric interacting
model
makes
the
(O(g2/x4>>.
meaningful
calculation 14 investigated .
It
quarks is
only
in
the
their
inter-nucleon
small
of their interaction
density
43%
medium
which
energy. This problem
may
strongly allow
a
is currently
ReFERENCES 1) G. Ma&,
Nucl Phys. B235 (1984) 197;
H.B. Nielsen and A. Patkos, Nucl.Phys. J.-M. Drouffe, Nucl.Phys. 2) G. Chanfray, 0. Nachtmann 3) See other contributions
B195 (1982) 137;
B218 (1983) 89. and H.J. Pirner, Phys.Lett.
147B (1984) 249.
to this Conference by A.W. Thomas and L. Wilets.
4) T.D. Lee, Phys.Rev. D19 (1979) 1802; D15 (1977) 1694. 5) P.A.M. Guichon - 88me Session d'Etudes, Aussois
(1985), Rep. Lycen 8502,C14.
6) A. Schuh, H.J. Pirner and L. Wilets,
of Six-Quark
"Dynamics
System in the
Soliton Bag Model"; A. Schuh, Thesis Heidelberg
(1985).
7) A.W. Thomas, Adv. in Nucl.Phys.
13 (1984) 1.
8) R.L. Jaffe, Phys.Rev. Dll (1975) 1593. 9) J. Baacke, Phys.Lett. 10) E.J. Moniz,
83B (1979) 103.
Phys.Rev.Lett.
11) RMC Collaboration,
26 (1971) 445.
Phys.Lett.
123B (1983) 123;
R.G. Arnold et al., Phys.Rev.Lett. 12) 0.
Nachtmann
and H.J.
Plrner,
52 (1984) 727.
Z.Phys.
C21
(1984)
277, and
to appear
in
Annalen der Physik, Leipzig. 13) F.
Giittner
and
MPI-Jahresbericht
H.J.
Pirner,
"Quark
(1984), Heidelberg.
14) G. Chanfray and H.J. Pirner, work in progress.
Percolation
in
Nuclei",