Diagnostic
Shelf
Y
@
Corn bination of Dextrocardia, Bundle Branch Block, and Myocardial Infarction Case Report with Vector Analysis of Electrocardiogram DONALD C. FISCHER, Cincinnati,
T
HIS
case is reported
to emphasize
bundle
combining branch
recorded
Its usefulness is exemplified
here in the interpretation tracing,
of a complex
the patterns
abnormal
of dextrocardia,
block, and acute myocardial
in-
farction in a single cardiogram. CASE HISTORY The
patient,
an 89-year-old
white female,
Ohio
moderately distended and the liver questionably palpable one finger’s breadth below the left costal margin and nontender. Pulses were palpable throughout and no peripheral edema was present. Laboratory jindings of significance included : PCV 38, hemoglobin 12.0 gm, WBC 7,750 with a normal differential, sedimentation rate 25 mm/hr, prothrombin time 75 per cent of normal. The urinalysis was normal, BUN Serology was negative. A chest 14.0, blood sugar 122. x-ray showed dextrocardia with cardiac enlargement, in-
the value
of vector analysis of the routinely
electrocardiogram.
M.D.
was ad-
mitted to Good Samaritan Hospital on March 31, 1957 complaining of right upper abdominal pain of several During the week prior to admission she hours’ duration. had experienced three episodes of similar pain, each lastIn the interim periods she was ing less than one hour. apparently without symptoms. The pain was like a and no associated sweating or dyspnea “gas-pressure,” The pain was not referred. was noted. Her significant past history included the knowledge She had a nonthat her heart was “in the right chest.” functioning gall bladder and nonfunctioning left kidney No definitive revealed by x-ray examinations in 1953. therapy for these conditions had been performed. Some five years prior to her present admission she had undergone surgery for a small bowel obstruction caused by adhesions about a ruptured ovarian cyst. Physical examination at the time of admission revealed: Temperature 98, pulse 90, respirations 26, blood pressure Exam138/80. The patient was not in acute distress. ination of the lungs revealed scattered basilar rales and The some diminution of breath sounds in both bases. PM1 was in the 6th intercostal space at the right midclavicular line. Heart rate was 90/min and regular; a basilar, grade 3 systolic murmur was heard, loudest in The abdomen was the aortic region; no thrill was felt.
“i
770
“6
“5
Fig. 1. Electrocardiogram sion to hospital. THE
AMERICAN
recorded
JOURNAL
at time of admis-
OF
CARDIOLOGY
Fischer
\
I I
\
YEAN \
QRS
\ ‘1 \ \ ‘\
TBlY*NAl.
\
.01
\
----
Tf++ / /
5
I
I /
’
.a
I
SEC.
QRS.
ST.,: __----
_ - - - - _ ----
\ \
‘, \
‘\
\
SPC.
QRS.
I
\
,’
(A) Fig. 2. (A) Frontal plane view of vectors involved in the writing of the electrocardiogram vectors, as viewed in the anterior-posterior plane of the chest.
creased perivascular pleural effusion.
markings,
and minimal
bilateral
The electrocardi’ogram
is shown in Figure
1.
The analysis of this -tracing by plotting of the vecforces involved is represented in Figures 2A and B. The following points are of particular in the figures, according
lined by Grant and Estes.’ (1) The vector representing same general
complex
direction
2B)
the
first
0.04
does not point in the QRS vecIt is rotracing.
180” in space from the mean
and points
out-
as the mean
tor, as one sees in a normal tated almost
to criteria
inferiorly
and posteriorly
(Fig. from
the sternum. (2) The T wave vector also points almost directly
posteriorly
from
the sternum
(Fig.
superiorly,
establishing
the ventricles
torial
set of the QRS
somewhat
(Fig. 2A),
ANALYSIS OF ELECTROCARDIOGRAMS
interest
teriorly,
and
(blocked)
of
and, therefore,
the electrical
impulse
lies in this area
from an electrical
to the left
that the last portion
to be depolarized,
the area to which layed
(B) Same
in Figure 1.
is de-
of the chest,
viewpoint. COMMENT
The only cardiac account would
abnormalities
for this combination be dextrocardia,
right
block, and acute myocardial area of anteroseptal the
QRS
terminal
point
infarction
myocardial
and the vector QRS
events
bundle
branch simulta-
The ST vector points to the
neously recorded. T vector
which would
of electrical
directly vector
infarction,
the
of the first 0.04 set of away
from
it.
The
points to the part of the
2B),
forming a large angle with the mean QRS vecThis angle would normally be 60” or less. tor. (3)
The vector of the ST segment is directed
distinctly sternum plane.
anteriorly
(Fig.
2B),
pointing
at the
and nearly perpendicular to the frontal In the normal ECG, and even with dex-
trocardia and bundle branch block combined, this vector should assume the same general pathway as the T vector. (4) The vector of the final 0.08 set of the QRS,
as well as the mean QRS
DECEMBER,
1958
vector, point an-
“4 v2 b3 Fig. 3. Supplemental chest leads recorded 12 hours after admission to hospital.
772
Dextrocardia,
right ventricle tricular The
farthest
depolarization possibility
that
from the source of ven:
an ECG representing cardiac
this pattern
block could
actually
farction
block was considered,
of bundle
represent
peri-in-
of the terminal
tor toward
ventricle
QRS
rather
in peri-infarction
branch
myocardial
block,
the terminal
vector
block simulating
at a later date to substantiate
the
RBBB
pointed
to emphasize proach
acute
of
right
anteroseptal
the value
of this method
in the interpretation
is shown of ap-
of the routinely
re-
corded electrocardiogram.
in the
ECG leads taken
REFERENCES 1.
the exact area of
infarction.
R. P. and ESTESE. H. : Spatial Vector Electrocardmgraphy. Blakiston, New York, 1952, pp. 68,
GRANT,
98-100. SUMMARY
(1)
and
dextrocardia,
infarction.
series reported by Dodge and Grant.* Figure 3 shows supplemental
of
(2) The vector analysis of the ECG
vec-
than
This vector also points well outside of
the area to which
bundle
an unusual combination
abnormalities
but seems elimi-
nated by the direction infarct.
Infarction
(Fig. 2B).
branch
the right
BBB, and Myocardial
A case report is presented which revealed
2.
R. P. and DODGE, H. T.: Mechanisms of QRS complex prolongation in man: right ventricular conduction defects. Am. J. Med. 21: 534,1956.
GRANT,
THE
AMERICAN
JOURNAL
OF CARDIOLOGY