Accepted Manuscript Combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema: The many aspects of a cohabitation contract Andriana I. Papaioannou, Konstantinos Kostikas, Effrosyni D. Manali, Georgia Papadaki, Aneza Roussou, Likurgos Kolilekas, Raphaël Borie, Demosthenis Bouros Prof, Spyridon A. Papiris PII:
S0954-6111(16)30081-6
DOI:
10.1016/j.rmed.2016.05.005
Reference:
YRMED 4910
To appear in:
Respiratory Medicine
Received Date: 29 November 2015 Revised Date:
20 March 2016
Accepted Date: 5 May 2016
Please cite this article as: Papaioannou AI, Kostikas K, Manali ED, Papadaki G, Roussou A, Kolilekas L, Borie R, Prof DB, Papiris SA, Combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema: The many aspects of a cohabitation contract, Respiratory Medicine (2016), doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2016.05.005. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
1
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Title: Combined Pulmonary Fibrosis and Emphysema: The many aspects of a cohabitation contract Andriana I Papaioannou MD1, Konstantinos Kostikas MD1, Effrosyni D Manali MD1, Georgia Papadaki MD1, Aneza Roussou MD1, Likurgos Kolilekas MD2,
1 nd
2
RI PT
Raphaël Borie MD3, Demosthenis Bouros Prof4, and Spyridon A Papiris Prof1 Respiratory Medicine Department, “Attikon” University Hospital, Athens
Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
SC
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected] 2 th
7 Department of Pneumonology, “Sotiria” Chest Diseases Hospital, Athens, Greece,
3
M AN U
[email protected]
APHP, Hôpital Bichat, DHU FIRE Service de Pneumologie A, Centre de
compétence des maladies pulmonaires rares, INSERM, Unité 1152, Université Paris Diderot, Paris, France,
[email protected] 4 st
1 Respiratory Medicine Department, “Sotiria” Chest Diseases Hospital, Athens,
Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece,
TE D
[email protected],
[email protected] Corresponding author
EP
Prof Spyridon A Papiris
2nd Respiratory Medicine Department Attikon” University Hospital, Athens Medical
AC C
School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece Email:
[email protected]
2
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Abstract Combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema (CPFE) is a clinical entity characterized by the coexistence of upper lobe emphysema and lower lobe fibrosis. Patients with this condition experience severe dyspnea and impaired gas exchange with preserved lung volumes. The diagnosis of the CPFE syndrome is based on
RI PT
HRCT imaging, showing the coexistence of emphysema and pulmonary fibrosis both in varying extent and locations within the lung parenchyma. Individual genetic background seem to predispose to the development of the disease. The risk of the development of pulmonary hypertension in patients with CPFE is high and related to
SC
poor prognosis. CPFE patients also present a high risk of lung cancer. Mortality is significant in patients with CPFE and median survival is reported between 2.1 and 8.5
M AN U
years. Currently, no specific recommendations are available regarding the management of patients with CPFE. In this review we provide information on the existing knowledge on CPFE regarding the pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, imaging, complications, possible therapeutic interventions and prognosis of the
AC C
EP
TE D
disease.
3
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Introduction Pulmonary emphysema and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) are two distinct entities defined by different clinical, functional, radiological, and pathological criteria 1
. IPF is the most common of the idiopathic interstitial lung diseases (i-ILD) and has
the histopathologic and/or radiologic pattern of usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) 2.
RI PT
Emphysema is defined as an enlargement of the air spaces distal to the terminal bronchioles due to the destruction of tissues forming their walls 3. These two distinct entities coexist in a condition characterized by upper lobe emphysema and lower lobe pulmonary fibrosis and it is therefore called combined pulmonary fibrosis and
SC
emphysema (CPFE). The coexistence of the two conditions which are considered to have different pathophysiological and functional characteristics, results in the development of a separate disease entity with distinct clinical and functional
M AN U
characteristics and different prognosis compared to its individual components4 . (Figure 1)
The histopathologic co-existence of pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema was first reported in 1974 by Auerbach and colleagues 5 who first described the presence of both entities in the lungs of smokers at autopsy. Following this, in 1990 Wiggins et
TE D
al described eight patients noticing not only the combination of the two different entities in CT but also that these patients were characterized by low diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) and preserved lung volumes 6. In the following years, several reports described patients with the coexistence of the two diseases7,8,
EP
supporting the idea that this was the coincidental occurrence of first emphysema and at later age of IPF, in smokers with great smoking history7. However, it was only on
AC C
2005, that the combination of pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema was characterized as a distinct entity1 and nowadays several studies are taking place for the better understanding of the pathophysiology of this condition as well as the possible genetic predisposing factors and the biological pathways which probably lead to its development.
Although several review papers on CPFE have been already published, the aim of the present review is to update recent information in this field, and to systematically describe the many aspects of CPFE discovered as the scientific community gets clinically better acquainted with the syndrome.
4
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Prevalence and Clinical manifestations CPFE is a disease that is increasingly recognized during the latest years 9. It has been reported that emphysema complicates IPF in approximately 30% of patients
10,11
. On
the other hand, in the COPD Gene Study Group (a mass screening study on smokers in the United States) it has been reported the presence of interstitial shadowing or
RI PT
radiologically overt interstitial pneumonia on HRCT of a great percentage of subjects with COPD 12,13
CPFE seems to occur most often in males after the sixth decade of life (mean 6,14,15
. Usually patients are current or ex-smokers with a smoking
history greater than 40 pack years
15,16
. However, CPFE has been also described in 17,18
SC
age of 65 years)
non-smokers in which was found to be related to mutations
. The association of
predisposition to the disease 19
M AN U
CPFE with connective tissue diseases even in non-smokers also shows the genetic
Patients usually present with severe dyspnea, mainly on exertion, which is associated with significant functional limitation and desaturation during exercise 1. Other manifestations, including cough, sputum production, and chest pain, are less often 1. Physical examination might reveal basal crackles and finger clubbing, while
Pathogenesis
TE D
wheezes can also occur in some cases 1,14
The exact mechanism which leads to the coexistence of pulmonary fibrosis and
EP
pulmonary emphysema is not fully understood. It is still unclear whether the coexistence of two different entities is nothing more than a “cohabitation” or if there
AC C
is a result of common mechanisms which lead to the development of both types of lesions. It has been supported that CPFE might be the result of the interaction of an environmental trigger (such as cigarette smoking) in patients with a genetic predisposition20,21. Smoking is known as the main cause of the development of emphysema and pulmonary fibrosis22 and also the majority of CPFE patients seem to be current or ex-smokers
15,16
. Studies have shown that smoking causes induction of
several epigenetic changes in the methylation of DNA which has been found to occur in both emphysema and IPF 23,24 while CPFE patients seem to have a greater smoking history compared to patients with lone IPF 10,25-27. It is worth to mention that there are few case reports that associate the development of CPFE in patients with certain occupational exposures such as in welders and coal workers28,29.
5
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Oxidative stress seems to be another probable risk factor for the development of both conditions
30,31
. In the case of emphysema, oxidative stress mainly caused by
cigarette smoking results in the development of cellular injury and apoptosis31, while in the case of pulmonary fibrosis cellular injury results in activation of fibroblasts and myofibroblasts as well as in the deposition of extracellular matrix32.
RI PT
Accelerated lung aging has been also proposed as a possible mechanism of the development of both pulmonary fibrosis and pulmonary emphysema22, and markers of senescence such as telomere shortening have been described in both conditions33
34
.
Another common mediator in both diseases is transforming growth factor- β (TGF-β) and although is known as a major regulator of fibrosis, it has been recently found to
SC
also play a significant role in the development of emphysema35. Finally, neutrophil elastases have been suggested to represent a common pathogenic link between
M AN U
emphysema and fibrosis by acting as a regulatory factor which leads to the expression of soluble cytokines with mitogenic activity for mesenchymal cells resulting either in
TE D
emphysema or in fibrosis or both36.
Radiological characteristics/Imaging studies Characteristically, on chest x-rays of CPFE patients lung volume is maintained although there is obvious reticulation in bilateral lower lung fields 37. The diagnosis of
EP
the CPFE syndrome is based on HRCT imaging which shows the coexistence of emphysema (mainly in the upper zones of the lungs) and pulmonary fibrosis subpleural
reticular
opacities,
honeycomb
AC C
(including
images
and
traction
bronchiectasis) in the lower lung zones 1. Emphysematous lesions in CPFE patients include the presence of either diffuse (centrilobular and/or bullous) emphysema or paraseptal emphysema with predominance in the subpleural areas
38,39
. While UIP
seems to be the most common reported finding in the assessment of the fibrotic aspect of CPFE, studies have shown that the imaging findings are heterogeneous 40. Patients with CPFE except from HRCT patterns of UIP, might also have patterns of fibrotic non-specific interstitial pneumonia (f-NSIP)
1,20,37
. A study of Cottin et al has shown
that the most frequent observations in HRCT of patients with CPFE were honeycombing (present in 95% of cases), reticular intralobular opacities (present in
6
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 87% of cases) and traction bronchiectasis (present in 73% of cases) 1. The zones of fibrosis and emphysema might be completely separated (emphysema in the upper zones and fibrosis in the bases (Figure 2 a-c), or to have a progressive transition between them (Figure 3 a-c). Finally, paraseptal emphysematous lesions might be also present at the bases of the lungs within the fibrotic lesions38 (Figure 4 a-c). Ground 1
and seem to be more frequent in CPFE patients
RI PT
glass opacities may be present
compared to patients with fibrosis only16 and could be attributed to smoking-related changes like desquamative interstitial pneumonia (DIP). Air-space consolidation and micronodules although reported, are rare
1
and could represent respiratory
SC
bronchiolitis-interstitial lung disease (RB-ILD) lesions related to smoking.
A distinct radiological feature of CPFE is the presence of large thick-walled cystic lesions
41
. These cysts are larger than honeycombing (they measure at least 1
M AN U
cm in diameter) and are delineated by a 1-mm-thick wall. They can be situated either in the upper lungs just beneath the chest wall or grow within the areas of reticulation 37
and/or honeycombing
(Figure 5 a-c and Figure 6 a-c). These thick-walled large
cysts probably represent the development of pulmonary fibrosis within the emphysematous lung, and seem to be enlarged due to retraction forces in the fibrotic
TE D
lesions 38. It is important to note that these cystic lesions do not seem to be present in patients with IPF or emphysema alone and thus, they should probably be considered as an important radiological feature of CPFE 41. Finally, it has been also reported that the extent of emphysema in CPFE patients with these large thick-walled cystic lesions
EP
was greater than that in patients without such lesions 41. In a previous study Matsuoka et al have shown that the morphological disease
AC C
progression in CPFE differed significantly from that of emphysema alone or fibrosis alone, whereas CPFE provided a more rapid increase in the emphysematous low attenuation lesions and the percentage of destructed area 42. Other findings of CPFE in HRCT include centrilobular nodules which
correspond to airway-centered fibrosis, (i.e. fibrotic changes along the respiratory bronchioles) and subpleural curvilinear opacities
37
. Since CPFE is often related to
lung cancer, possible nodules or masses which might appear in the lung parenchyma should be carefully interpreted
37
. Finally, since CPFE is also related to the
development of pulmonary hypertension, important findings in the CT scans might be the dilatation of the central pulmonary arteries, the enlargement of the right heart, the reduction of peripheral branches of the pulmonary arteries and the mosaic appearance
7
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT of the pulmonary parenchyma.
37,43
. The later however, might be difficult to observe
because of the fibrotic lesions in the pulmonary parenchyma
37,43
The main
radiological characteristics of CPFE are summarized in Table 1
Pathophysiology (lung volumes, pulmonary function tests)
RI PT
The pulmonary function tests of patients with CPFE are characterized by the preservation of spirometric values and static lung volumes and the significant reduction of the diffusion capacity of carbon monoxide (DLCO)
16,44,45
. The reason
for the relatively normal spirometric values observed in CPFE is the result of a
SC
counterbalance between the restrictive effects of pulmonary fibrosis and the hyperinflation caused by emphysematous lesions. Thus, the increased traction caused by pulmonary fibrosis supports the small airways and prevents the airway collapse,
M AN U
which is normally seen in emphysema, resulting in this way to the preservation of the forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1)
46
. On the other hand, the severe
impairment of gas exchange observed in CPFE is the result of the reduced vascular surface area and pulmonary capillary blood volume, caused by both fibrotic and emphysematous lesions, in combination with the alveolar membrane thickening
TE D
caused by the fibrotic lesions 46. The degree of the preservation of spirometric values depends on the extent of the emphysematous and fibrotic lesions and it has been shown that some CPFE patients have airflow obstruction (defined as a postbronchodilation FEV1/FVC ratio ≤70%)
44
. Furthermore, the extent of fibrosis and
EP
emphysema seems to correlate with the reduction in DLCO and the degree of pulmonary hypertension while the different patterns of the disease on HRCT
AC C
correspond to specific changes on pulmonary function tests.38 In order to predict mortality in patients with IPF Wells et al have developed a
composite physiologic index (CPI) 47 .The formula for the CPI was as follows: extent of disease on CT = 91.0 - (0.65 x percent predicted diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide [DLCO]) - (0.53 x percent predicted FVC) + (0.34 x percent predicted FEV1). However, in a study which included patients with CPFE the CPI was not able to predict mortality and FEV1 was found to be the best predictor of mortality 48. Regarding the annual changes of pulmonary function CPFE patients show a significantly more rapid decrease in FEV1/FVC compared to patients with IPF only 49 and a significantly higher decrease in VC and FVC compared to patients with
8
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT emphysema only 50. FVC values seem to decline rapidly over time and are affected by the extent of the fibrotic lesions 51. Annual decrease in FEV1/FVC in patients with CPFE seems to be lower than in those with only emphysema
50
. Although the annual decrease in DLCO does not
CPFE patients compared to patients with only emphysema 50.
RI PT
differ between patients with CPFE and those with IPF only 49, it seems to be higher in
In CPFE patients there is a significant correlation between DLCO% predicted and both the extent of emphysema in the upper lobe or the degree of fibrosis in the lower lobe suggesting that both fibrosis and emphysema contribute to the 51
. However, there is no correlation
SC
disproportionate reduction in gas exchange
between the degree of diffusion impairment and degree of dyspnea 52.
M AN U
Regarding lung mechanics, the measurement of multifrequency forced oscillation technique has shown that whole-breath resistance is significantly lower in patients with CPFE compared to patients with fibrotic interstitial pneumonia or emphysema alone and this difference occurred irrespectively of the severity of airflow limitation although expiratory flow limitation in CPFE patients is significantly higher than in those with fibrotic interstitial pneumonia and lower than in patients with only 53
. When diaphragmatic motions were measured using M-mode
TE D
emphysema
ultrasonographic images, CPFE patients showed lower diaphragmatic motions compared both to patients with only emphysema and to those with only fibrosis both during quiet breathing and deep breathing. Emphysema and not fibrosis seemed to be
EP
the main cause of limited diaphragmatic motion in patients with CPFE 54.
AC C
Pathological findings
The radiological characteristics of CPFE correspond to pathologic features of
destructive pulmonary alterations seen in smokers (i.e. emphysema and fibrosis) Wright et al.
55
37
.
described 2 main types of smoking-related interstitial lung disease.
The first, the so-called diffuse form, includes an overlap of pulmonary emphysema and fibrotic interstitial pneumonia (either UIP or f-NSIP). The second, named as the localized form, includes the presence of emphysema with fibrosis, air space enlargement with fibrosis, or occult fibrosis of smokers
55
. Although pulmonary
emphysema is by definition air space enlargement without fibrosis, Wright described
9
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT frequently varying degrees of pulmonary fibrosis in the alveolar septa around the emphysema wall
55
. Fibrotic lesions can be also identified along bronchioles around
the emphysematous areas 56. Post-mortem observations have shown the presence of thick-walled cystic lesions involving one or more acini. These cystic lesions are characterized by dense
normal alveoli
41
RI PT
wall fibrosis and occasional fibroblastic foci surrounded by honeycombing and and have been previously described as lesions of emphysema with
fibrosis 55 or as air space enlargement with fibrosis 57.
In a previous study, Katzenstein et al.58 described the presence of varying
SC
degrees of alveolar septal widening by collagen deposition along with emphysema and respiratory bronchiolitis in the lungs of smokers; a change that they designated as
M AN U
occult fibrosis of smokers or smoking-related interstitial fibrosis (SRIF). This lesions of fibrosis occurred both in subpleural and in deeper parenchyma and surrounded emphysematous lesions, but they also involved non-emphysematous parenchyma 58. In summary, although the clinical definition of CPFE pathologically is characterized by the coexistence of emphysema and fibrotic interstitial pneumonia (UIP and f-NSIP patterns), pathological studies have also shown a multiplicity of
TE D
fibrotic and non-fibrotic lesions such as SRIF, characterized by airspace enlargement with fibrosis known as desquamative interstitial pneumonia (DIP) and respiratory bronchiolitis- interstitial lung disease (RBILD) 1,40,46,56. Pathological characteristics of
EP
CPFE are summarized in Table 2
Cytokines in CPFE
AC C
Several cytokines have been studied regarding their role and expression in patients with CPFE. Animal studies have shown that overexpression of mediators such as tumor necrosis factor-a (TNF-a), platelet-derived growth factor-b (PDGF) transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β)
60
59
and
can result to airspace dilatation and
fibrosis 61.
CPFE patients seem to have lower LDH levels and higher levels of CRP in serum compared to patients with IPF only, while these two groups do not seem to differ regarding the levels of KL-6 and Surfactant Protein D (SP-D) 11. On the other hand, patients with CPFE have been found to express higher serum concentrations of CC16, SP-D, and KL-6 compared to healthy controls and patients with only
10
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT emphysema
62
. In CPFE patients, SP-D levels correlate to FEV1 and mean systolic
pulmonary artery pressure
62
whereas the combination of KL-6 and SP-D was found
to correlate with markers of pulmonary function tests 63. Serum KL-6 levels have been also found to be predictors of acute exacerbations in patients with CPFE
64
. Finally,
the combination of CC16 and KL-6 levels was a good predictor of CPFE 62.
RI PT
Patients with CPFE have been found to have increased absolute numbers of neutrophils and increased concentrations of CXCL5 and CXCL8 in BAL compared to patients with IPF alone11. Furthermore, CXCL8 concentrations in BAL fluid significantly correlated to the extent of emphysema on HRCT and to the number of
M AN U
accumulation in the airspaces of CPFE patients 11.
SC
neutrophils in BAL suggesting a possible role of this chemokine on neutrophil
Genetics
Studies suggest that the development of CPFE is the result of the combination of genetic predisposition and environmental exposure (such as smoking) in susceptible individuals. More specifically, the continued damage of alveolar epithelial cells leads to attempts of alveolar regeneration and uncontrolled fibrosis proliferation fibrosis 9.
TE D
and parenchymal destruction resulting in a vicious cycle of continuous damage and
Individual genetic backgrounds seem to predispose to the development of CPFE. A polymorphism in the promoter of the matrix metalloproteinase-1 gene, has
EP
been identified in smokers 65 and it has been hypothesized that such pathway might be dysfunctional in patients with CPFE. However, CPFE has been also described in non-
AC C
smokers in which was found to be related to genetic mutations of surfactant proteins, whereas mutation in the telomerase complex could predisposed smokers to CPFE 17,18,66
. A heterozygous mutation in the gene which encodes surfactant protein C has
been reported in a young female nonsmoker with CPFE 17. A heterozygous mutation of the ATP-binding cassette subfamily member 3 gene (ABCA3, MIM 601615) has been described in an adult nonsmoker patient 18. These mutations are known to cause dysfunction of surfactant homeostasis and result to the injury or death of alveolar epithelial type II cells and to the proliferation of myofibroblasts 17. In Figure 7a-c we provide the CT scan of a 19 year-old female patient with a 8 year history of ILD which was found to have an of ABCA3 mutation. Finally, whereas both fibrosis and
11
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT emphysema are associated with telomere shortening
66-68
, inherited telomerase
complex mutations were until recently associated only with fibrosis
69
CPFE features
have been described in a family with inherited telomerase mutations and further associated with a specific risk of COPD and emphysema particularly in women <50
RI PT
years-old 66,70.
Pulmonary hypertension
The risk of the development of pulmonary hypertension (PH) in patients with CPFE is higher than this of patients with only IPF or only emphysema [1]. It is
SC
possible that the prevalence and severity of PH in CPFE is the result of an additive effect of the two separate disease processes which are known to be independently 71
. Both emphysema and fibrosis cause reduction of the
M AN U
associated with PH
pulmonary capillary bed, while hypoxia further results in the increase of pulmonary vascular resistance 72. However, it has been suggested that PH in CPFE is a common process in susceptible individuals, probably mediated through chronic inflammation induced by cigarette smoke that results in vascular remodeling in addition to fibrosis and emphysema 71. Many of the symptoms of patients with CPFE are largely related
TE D
to the development of severe precapillary PH 10,73. PH occurs early after the diagnosis of CPFE 73, while the onset of PH in CPFE is a predictor of increased mortality (one year survival of approximately 60%) 10,73.
The physiologically consistent pattern of PH in CPFE is characterized by
EP
increased pressure in the pulmonary artery (Ppa), elevated pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR), increased heart rate, and lower cardiac index73. Pathological
AC C
findings include intimal fibrosis and medial hypertrophy of the pulmonary artery and thickening and fibrosis of the pulmonary veins resulting in marked luminal narrowing74,75. Modest venopathy, can be present but without obvious capillary changes74. Interestingly, obstruction of small muscular pulmonary arteries can be present even in areas of normal lung75. It is important to note that there is no evidence of plexiform lesions 75. Since the prognosis of patients with CPFE is affected from the development of PH, follow up should include regular assessments of pulmonary artery pressures
71
.
Transthoracic echocardiography is not accurate on the estimation of systolic Ppa especially in patients with lung diseases
76
and right heart catheterization (RHC)
12
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT should be performed in cases where the accurate measurement of pulmonary hemodynamics is necessary
71
for example in cases where specific treatment is
considered. There are no specific recommendations regarding the treatment of PH in patients with CPFE although several case reports indicate that specific therapy for PH may improve haemodynamics, in these patients
73,77,78
but without clear evidence for
RI PT
clinical and survival benefit.
Lung Cancer in CPFE
Though cigarette smoking is known as the most important risk factor for lung cancer,
SC
both emphysema and IPF (which are smoking-related diseases) have been recognized as independent risk factors for the development of lung cancer
79-81
. Repeated lung
injury and chronic inflammation are thought to contribute to genetic mutations which
M AN U
lead to the development of lung cancer in both emphysema and IPF 82. CPFE is also associated with smoking and several studies have shown that the prevalence of lung cancer is high in CPFE patients 82,83. Finally, although the risk of lung cancer in CPFE patients has been shown to be greater compared to patients with emphysema only, no significant difference has been found between CPFE and IPF 82.
TE D
The location of lung cancer development differs between IPF and emphysema. In patients with emphysema, lung cancer most frequently occurs in the upper lung 79. On the contrary, in patients with IPF, lung cancer tends to occur in the subpleural
EP
areas mainly in the lower lobes 82,84. In patients with CPFE, lung cancer tends to occur more frequently in the subpleural area similarly to IPF, which leads to the hypothesis that probably the development of lung cancer in these patients is mostly related to the
AC C
fibrotic abnormalities whereas emphysema does not have any additive impact on tumorigenesis 82.
In a recent study which included patients with lung cancer, CPFE has been
found to be more prevalent than fibrosis only, and patients with CPFE had a poorer prognosis
85
. The most frequent histological types of lung cancer in CPFE are
squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma whereas small cell lung cancer occurs in a minority of cases
86
. CPFE is also an unfavorable prognostic factor in patients
with non-small cell lung cancer after complete tumour resection
87
. Figure 8 a and b
13
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT and Figure 9 a and b show characteristic CT images of lung cancer in two patients with CPFE.
CPFE in Connective Tissue Diseases (CTD)
RI PT
CPFE may also be encountered as a pulmonary manifestation within the spectrum of connective tissue disease-associated lung diseases, with generally similar features as ‘idiopathic’ CPFE19. Patients with CTD are usually younger and although there is still a male predominance (approximately 68%) this is not as strong as in idiopathic CPFE
SC
where more than 90% of patients are male4,19. Furthermore, in patients with CTD, CPFE can also occur in only mild or no smoking history, suggesting that the
M AN U
underlying CTD may contribute to the development of emphysema 4,88. CPFE can occur in almost any type of CTD although less frequently than in IPF89. The predominant CTD associated with the development of CPFE are rheumatoid arthritis and systemic sclerosis (SSc), however, CPFE has also been reported in patients with polymyositis, Sjögren’s syndrome, mixed connective tissue disease and overlapping CTDs, with consistent antibody profiles4,19. Usually, the
TE D
diagnosis of CPFE follows that of CTD although in some patients the two conditions might be diagnosed at the same time19.
The imaging features of patients with CPFE and CTD are similar to those with idiopathic CPFE and include areas of reticulation, architectural distortion,
EP
honeycombing and traction bronchiectasis4 which are mainly situated in the lower lung zones and in subpleural areas. Other HRCT findings include ground-glass
AC C
opacities. The imaging pattern of UIP is observed more frequently than NSIP. The emphysematous changes in CPFE include mainly paraseptal emphysema while panlobular emphysema is rare. Thick-walled large cysts of the lower zones of the lungs can be also observed 4. Patients with CPFE in CTD have better survival compared to patients with
idiopathic CPFE 19. However, the survival of patients with CPFE syndrome according to the type of CTD is not known. Similarly to idiopathic CPFE, the development of PH is a poor prognostic factor and pulmonary pressures seem to be higher in patients with CPFE and CTD than in patients with ILDs related to CTD but without emphysema. 4,19
14
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Acute exacerbations in patients with CPFE Patients with CPFE might experience the development of diffuse alveolar damage (DAD) upon the emphysema-UIP histology, clinically manifesting as an acute lung injury–adults respiratory distress syndrome (ALI-ARDS) upon CPFE, a condition
RI PT
similar to the so-called acute exacerbations of IPF 4. Predictors of acute exacerbations in patients with CPFE were the increased dyspnea level and higher baseline serum KL-6
64
. Although the presence of emphysema was found to be a predictor of acute
exacerbation in patients with IPF90 acute exacerbations of IPF seem to be more fatal compared to those observed in patients with CPFE25 although the latter are still
SC
related to increased mortality64. In CPFE acute exacerbations, it is very important to investigate all possible conditions that might precipitate a subacute-acute
M AN U
deterioration, such as lower respiratory tract infections, heart failure, pulmonary embolism or pneumothorax and provide appropriate treatment91. CPFE patients may also be at increased risk of ALI after lung resection surgery 46,92 (Figures 10 a-d). A previous study has shown that in patients with CPFE and lung cancer, chemotherapy may also induce ALI 85 although this finding was not
TE D
confirmed in a recent study93.
Prognosis
Mortality is significant in patients with CPFE and median survival has been reported 1,10,25,94,95
while 5 year survival ranges between 38
EP
to be between 2.1 and 8.5 years. and 55% 1,16,96.
AC C
The rate of decline in lung function seems to differ between patients with only fibrosis and those with CPFE. Patients with CPFE show a slower decline in both FVC, TLC and DLCO over time, and unlike IPF patients, which show an increase in the FEV1/FVC ratio, in CPFE patients this ratio may decrease overtime 26. Regarding prognosis, although in IPF the annual rate of decline in FVC, DLCO or the CPI are known to be independent predictors of survival, in patients with CPFE survival is strongly related to the decline of FEV1 48. Furthermore, CPFE progresses more rapidly in active smokers compared to patients that have quit smoking clubbing seems to be also an independent predictor of mortality.64
97
. Finally, finger
15
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT It has been debated whether survival in patients with CPFE is better or not, compared to patients with lone fibrosis. Several studies have shown a better survival in CPFE patients
25,98
, although others failed to demonstrate differences in mortality 27,94
between these two groups 10,99
or have reported a worse survival in CPFE patients
. These differences are probably associated to the great heterogeneity of patients
RI PT
with CPFE regarding the extent of the fibrotic and emphysematous lesions 16,40, and to the fact that probably some studies included not only patients with UIP but also patients with f-NSIP hypertension
1,10,99
100
. Furthermore, both the development of pulmonary
and lung cancer are associated with reduced survival
in CPFE
SC
patients.
87
In CPFE the extent of fibrosis in HRCT has been reported to be a significant predictor of survival
96
. Furthermore, patients with CPFE related to centrilobular or
M AN U
mixed emphysema have better survival not only compared to patients with only IPF but also compared to patients with CPFE and minor emphysema or with advanced paraseptal emphysema 95,99. These findings suggest that in CPFE patients, prognosis is mostly related to the fibrotic component whereas emphysema seems to influence
TE D
survival only in cases that is very extensive or progressive.
Therapeutic interventions
Currently, no specific recommendations are available regarding the management of patients with CPFE. The general measures that should be taken are smoking cessation
EP
for patients who continue to smoke and oxygen therapy for patients with respiratory failure. Since patients who continue to smoke have a worst prognosis compared to 97
CPFE patients are in an urgent need to stop
AC C
patients who have quit smoking
smoking and all efforts should be made to help patients to quit using all available interventions
101
. Oxygen therapy is known to improve survival in patients with
COPD and in those with pulmonary hypertension who experience respiratory failure 102,103
. Vaccination against influenza viruses and S. pneumoniae might also be a
reasonable intervention 20. In patients with airflow obstruction inhaled bronchodilators might be also prescribed
16
. In the presence of pulmonary hypertension, specific
therapy might result to the improvement of haemodynamics 73,77,78 although the use of these therapies in CPFE-related pulmonary hypertension needs to be further evaluated.
16
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Novel treatments for IPF such as pirfenidone and the novel tyrosine kinase inhibitor nintedanib, might be beneficial for CPFE patients as well. In a recent study it has been shown that patients with CPFE tolerated pirfenidone well and had a stable course of disease during treatment
104
. Pulmonary function alterations during
pirfenidone treatment were not different between patients with CPFE and those with 104
. However, more studies are needed in order to define the response of
RI PT
IPF only
CPFE patients on the treatment with pirfenidone. The possible beneficial effects of nintedanib on disease progression and survival of CPFE patients remains unknown. Finally, patients with severe disease should also be considered for lung transplantation and the well preserved lung volumes should not work against these patients in their
SC
46
The many faces of CPFE
M AN U
lung allocation score.
Current evidence shows that patients with CPFE might express different degree of its two components (i.e. pulmonary fibrosis and pulmonary emphysema) and might develop one or more of different comorbidities or complications (Figure 12). CPFE patients show great heterogeneity regarding the extent of the fibrotic and
TE D
emphysematous lesions and this might be associated to the different decline of lung function and survival rates as well as the recognition of slow and rapid progressors of the disease which have been reported in different patient series16,40. Patients who develop pulmonary hypertension are characterized by poorer survival10,73. A subgroup
EP
of CPFE patients develop lung cancer and their prognosis is also poor85. Some patients are susceptible to exacerbations and require hospital admission and
AC C
aggressive treatment. Finally, CPFE might appear in patients with genetic mutations17,18 or might be related to connective tissue disease19. This disease heterogeneity leads to the need of further understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms behind its development in order to allow to the better characterization of the patient’s needs and to help the establishment of more personalized treatment.
Conclusions Available data show that CPFE, irrespective of its origin, or whether it is a cohabitation or the result of common pathogenetic mechanisms of two different
17
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT smoking related diseases, it appears to be a distinct clinical entity with its own phenotypes, clinical course and complications, related to the interaction of specific genetic and environmental factors. CPFE is an increasingly recognized condition and seems to be related to different natural history and prognosis than IPF. CPFE should be suspected in smokers with interstitial lung disease and severely reduced DLCO
RI PT
with preserved lung volumes and diagnosis should be confirmed via HRCT. Early recognition of this disease and early diagnosis of its complications (i.e. development of pulmonary hypertension or lung cancer) is of great importance for providing to the patient the best care and support. Finally, further research is needed for the better
SC
understanding of the underline mechanisms, related to the pathogenesis and pathophysiology of the disease, which will help to the development of novel and
M AN U
effective therapies.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to greatly thank for their contribution Professors B. Crestani and H.Mal (Hôpital Bichat, Paris) and A. Cuvelier (CHU Rouen) and acknowledge
TE D
the precious contribution and thank very much Dr Caroline Kannengiesser (Genetic Laboratory Hôpital Bichat, Paris), Dr Nadia Nathan and Dr Serge Amselem (Genetic Laboratory Hôpital Armand Trousseau, Paris) for the genetic analysis of the patient of Figure 7
EP
Finally, the authors would like to thank Ms Tina Panagiotopoulou for her help with the artistic creation of Figure 1.
AC C
The manuscript has been supported by the Greek State Scholarship Foundation Fellowships of Excellence- Siemens.
18
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT References 1. 2.
RI PT
3.
Cottin V, Nunes H, Brillet PY, et al. Combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema: a distinct underrecognised entity. Eur Respir J. Oct 2005;26(4):586-593. Raghu G, Collard HR, Egan JJ, et al. An official ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT statement: idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: evidence-based guidelines for diagnosis and management. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. Mar 15 2011;183(6):788-824. Celli BR, MacNee W. Standards for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with COPD: a summary of the ATS/ERS position paper. Eur Respir J. Jun 2004;23(6):932946. Cottin V, Nunes H, Mouthon L, et al. Combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema syndrome in connective tissue disease. Arthritis Rheum. Jan 2011;63(1):295-304. Auerbach O, Garfinkel L, Hammond EC. Relation of smoking and age to findings in lung parenchyma: a microscopic study. Chest. Jan 1974;65(1):29-35. Wiggins J, Strickland B, Turner-Warwick M. Combined cryptogenic fibrosing alveolitis and emphysema: the value of high resolution computed tomography in assessment. Respir Med. Sep 1990;84(5):365-369. Hiwatari N, Shimura S, Takishima T. Pulmonary emphysema followed by pulmonary fibrosis of undetermined cause. Respiration. 1993;60(6):354-358. Doherty MJ, Pearson MG, O'Grady EA, Pellegrini V, Calverley PM. Cryptogenic fibrosing alveolitis with preserved lung volumes. Thorax. Nov 1997;52(11):9981002. Dias OM, Baldi BG, Costa AN, Carvalho CR. Combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema: an increasingly recognized condition. J Bras Pneumol. May-Jun 2014;40(3):304-312. Mejia M, Carrillo G, Rojas-Serrano J, et al. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema: decreased survival associated with severe pulmonary arterial hypertension. Chest. Jul 2009;136(1):10-15. Tasaka S, Mizoguchi K, Funatsu Y, et al. Cytokine profile of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid in patients with combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema. Respirology. Jul 2012;17(5):814-820. Washko GR, Lynch DA, Matsuoka S, et al. Identification of early interstitial lung disease in smokers from the COPDGene Study. Acad Radiol. Jan 2010;17(1):48-53. Washko GR, Hunninghake GM, Fernandez IE, et al. Lung volumes and emphysema in smokers with interstitial lung abnormalities. N Engl J Med. Mar 10 2011;364(10):897-906. Marten K, Milne D, Antoniou KM, et al. Non-specific interstitial pneumonia in cigarette smokers: a CT study. Eur Radiol. Jul 2009;19(7):1679-1685. Grubstein A, Bendayan D, Schactman I, Cohen M, Shitrit D, Kramer MR. Concomitant upper-lobe bullous emphysema, lower-lobe interstitial fibrosis and pulmonary hypertension in heavy smokers: report of eight cases and review of the literature. Respir Med. Aug 2005;99(8):948-954. Cottin V. The impact of emphysema in pulmonary fibrosis. Eur Respir Rev. Jun 1 2013;22(128):153-157. Cottin V, Reix P, Khouatra C, Thivolet-Bejui F, Feldmann D, Cordier JF. Combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema syndrome associated with familial SFTPC mutation. Thorax. Oct 2011;66(10):918-919. Epaud R, Delestrain C, Louha M, Simon S, Fanen P, Tazi A. Combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema syndrome associated with ABCA3 mutations. Eur Respir J. Feb 2014;43(2):638-641.
4.
5.
9.
10.
11.
12.
AC C
13.
TE D
8.
EP
7.
M AN U
SC
6.
14.
15.
16. 17.
18.
19
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
24. 25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30. 31. 32.
AC C
33.
RI PT
23.
SC
22.
M AN U
21.
TE D
20.
Cottin V, Cordier JF. Combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema in connective tissue disease. Curr Opin Pulm Med. Sep 2012;18(5):418-427. Papiris SA, Triantafillidou C, Manali ED, et al. Combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema. Expert Rev Respir Med. Feb 2013;7(1):19-31; quiz 32. Lin H, Jiang S. Combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema (CPFE): an entity different from emphysema or pulmonary fibrosis alone. J Thorac Dis. Apr 2015;7(4):767-779. Morse D, Rosas IO. Tobacco smoke-induced lung fibrosis and emphysema. Annu Rev Physiol. 2014;76:493-513. Talikka M, Sierro N, Ivanov NV, et al. Genomic impact of cigarette smoke, with application to three smoking-related diseases. Crit Rev Toxicol. Nov 2012;42(10):877-889. Yang IV. Epigenomics of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Epigenomics. Apr 2012;4(2):195-203. Kurashima K, Takayanagi N, Tsuchiya N, et al. The effect of emphysema on lung function and survival in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Respirology. Jul 2010;15(5):843-848. Akagi T, Matsumoto T, Harada T, et al. Coexistent emphysema delays the decrease of vital capacity in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Respir Med. Aug 2009;103(8):1209-1215. Ryerson CJ, Hartman T, Elicker BM, et al. Clinical features and outcomes in combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Chest. Jul 2013;144(1):234-240. Leigh J, Driscoll TR, Cole BD, Beck RW, Hull BP, Yang J. Quantitative relation between emphysema and lung mineral content in coalworkers. Occup Environ Med. Jun 1994;51(6):400-407. Roshan R, Guptal M, Kulshrestha R, Menon B, Chhabra SK. Combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema in a welder. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis. Mar 2012;77(1):2628. Rahman I, Skwarska E, Henry M, et al. Systemic and pulmonary oxidative stress in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Free Radic Biol Med. Jul 1999;27(1-2):60-68. MacNee W. Oxidants/antioxidants and COPD. Chest. May 2000;117(5 Suppl 1):303S-317S. Chapman HA. Epithelial-mesenchymal interactions in pulmonary fibrosis. Annu Rev Physiol. 2011;73:413-435. Ito K, Barnes PJ. COPD as a disease of accelerated lung aging. Chest. Jan 2009;135(1):173-180. Cronkhite JT, Xing C, Raghu G, et al. Telomere shortening in familial and sporadic pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. Oct 1 2008;178(7):729-737. Celedon JC, Lange C, Raby BA, et al. The transforming growth factor-beta1 (TGFB1) gene is associated with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Hum Mol Genet. Aug 1 2004;13(15):1649-1656. Lucattelli M, Bartalesi B, Cavarra E, et al. Is neutrophil elastase the missing link between emphysema and fibrosis? Evidence from two mouse models. Respir Res. 2005;6:83. Sakai F, Tominaga J, Kaga A, et al. Imaging diagnosis of interstitial pneumonia with emphysema (combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema). Pulm Med. 2012;2012:816541. Brillet PY, Cottin V, Letoumelin P, et al. [Combined apical emphysema and basal fibrosis syndrome (emphysema/fibrosis syndrome): CT imaging features and pulmonary function tests]. J Radiol. Jan 2009;90(1 Pt 1):43-51.
EP
19.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
20
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
44.
45.
46. 47.
48.
49.
AC C
50.
RI PT
43.
SC
42.
M AN U
41.
TE D
40.
Rogliani P, Mura M, Mattia P, et al. HRCT and histopathological evaluation of fibrosis and tissue destruction in IPF associated with pulmonary emphysema. Respir Med. Dec 2008;102(12):1753-1761. Jankowich MD, Polsky M, Klein M, Rounds S. Heterogeneity in combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema. Respiration. 2008;75(4):411-417. Inomata M, Ikushima S, Awano N, et al. An autopsy study of combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema: correlations among clinical, radiological, and pathological features. BMC Pulm Med. 2014;14:104. Matsuoka S, Yamashiro T, Matsushita S, et al. Morphological disease progression of combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema: comparison with emphysema alone and pulmonary fibrosis alone. J Comput Assist Tomogr. Mar-Apr 2015;39(2):153-159. Devaraj A, Wells AU, Meister MG, Corte TJ, Hansell DM. The effect of diffuse pulmonary fibrosis on the reliability of CT signs of pulmonary hypertension. Radiology. Dec 2008;249(3):1042-1049. Kitaguchi Y, Fujimoto K, Hanaoka M, Honda T, Hotta J, Hirayama J. Pulmonary function impairment in patients with combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema with and without airflow obstruction. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2014;9:805-811. Mura M, Zompatori M, Pacilli AM, Fasano L, Schiavina M, Fabbri M. The presence of emphysema further impairs physiologic function in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Respir Care. Mar 2006;51(3):257-265. Jankowich MD, Rounds SI. Combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema syndrome: a review. Chest. Jan 2012;141(1):222-231. Wells AU, Desai SR, Rubens MB, et al. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a composite physiologic index derived from disease extent observed by computed tomography. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. Apr 1 2003;167(7):962-969. Schmidt SL, Nambiar AM, Tayob N, et al. Pulmonary function measures predict mortality differently in IPF versus combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema. Eur Respir J. Jul 2011;38(1):176-183. Kim YJ, Shin SH, Park JW, et al. Annual Change in Pulmonary Function and Clinical Characteristics of Combined Pulmonary Fibrosis and Emphysema and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: Over a 3-Year Follow-up. Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul). Jul 2014;77(1):18-23. Kitaguchi Y, Fujimoto K, Hayashi R, Hanaoka M, Honda T, Kubo K. Annual changes in pulmonary function in combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema: over a 5year follow-up. Respir Med. Dec 2013;107(12):1986-1992. Ando K, Sekiya M, Tobino K, Takahashi K. Relationship between quantitative CT metrics and pulmonary function in combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema. Lung. Dec 2013;191(6):585-591. Heathcote KL, Cockcroft DW, Fladeland DA, Fenton ME. Normal expiratory flow rate and lung volumes in patients with combined emphysema and interstitial lung disease: a case series and literature review. Can Respir J. Sep-Oct 2011;18(5):e7376. Mori K, Shirai T, Mikamo M, et al. Respiratory mechanics measured by forced oscillation technique in combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. Jan 15 2013;185(2):235-240. He L, Zhang W, Zhang J, et al. Diaphragmatic motion studied by M-mode ultrasonography in combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema. Lung. Aug 2014;192(4):553-561.
EP
39.
51.
52.
53.
54.
21
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
60.
61.
62.
63.
64.
65.
66.
AC C
67.
RI PT
59.
SC
58.
M AN U
57.
TE D
56.
Wright JL, Tazelaar HD, Churg A. Fibrosis with emphysema. Histopathology. Mar 2011;58(4):517-524. Yousem SA. Respiratory bronchiolitis-associated interstitial lung disease with fibrosis is a lesion distinct from fibrotic nonspecific interstitial pneumonia: a proposal. Mod Pathol. Nov 2006;19(11):1474-1479. Kawabata Y, Hoshi E, Murai K, et al. Smoking-related changes in the background lung of specimens resected for lung cancer: a semiquantitative study with correlation to postoperative course. Histopathology. Dec 2008;53(6):707-714. Katzenstein AL, Mukhopadhyay S, Zanardi C, Dexter E. Clinically occult interstitial fibrosis in smokers: classification and significance of a surprisingly common finding in lobectomy specimens. Hum Pathol. Mar 2010;41(3):316-325. Hoyle GW, Li J, Finkelstein JB, et al. Emphysematous lesions, inflammation, and fibrosis in the lungs of transgenic mice overexpressing platelet-derived growth factor. Am J Pathol. Jun 1999;154(6):1763-1775. Lee CG, Cho S, Homer RJ, Elias JA. Genetic control of transforming growth factorbeta1-induced emphysema and fibrosis in the murine lung. Proc Am Thorac Soc. Aug 2006;3(6):476-477. Lundblad LK, Thompson-Figueroa J, Leclair T, et al. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha overexpression in lung disease: a single cause behind a complex phenotype. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. Jun 15 2005;171(12):1363-1370. Kokuho N, Ishii T, Kamio K, et al. Diagnostic Values For Club Cell Secretory Protein (CC16) in Serum of Patients of Combined Pulmonary Fibrosis and Emphysema. COPD. Sep 22 2014. Chiba S, Ohta H, Abe K, et al. The Diagnostic Value of the Interstitial Biomarkers KL-6 and SP-D for the Degree of Fibrosis in Combined Pulmonary Fibrosis and Emphysema. Pulm Med. 2012;2012:492960. Kishaba T, Shimaoka Y, Fukuyama H, et al. A cohort study of mortality predictors and characteristics of patients with combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema. BMJ Open. 2012;2(3). Mercer BA, Wallace AM, Brinckerhoff CE, D'Armiento JM. Identification of a cigarette smoke-responsive region in the distal MMP-1 promoter. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. Jan 2009;40(1):4-12. Stanley SE, Chen JJ, Podlevsky JD, et al. Telomerase mutations in smokers with severe emphysema. J Clin Invest. Feb 2015;125(2):563-570. Savale L, Chaouat A, Bastuji-Garin S, et al. Shortened telomeres in circulating leukocytes of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. Apr 1 2009;179(7):566-571. Alder JK, Chen JJ, Lancaster L, et al. Short telomeres are a risk factor for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Sep 2 2008;105(35):13051-13056. Borie R, Kannengiesser C, Crestani B. Familial forms of nonspecific interstitial pneumonia/idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: clinical course and genetic background. Curr Opin Pulm Med. Sep 2012;18(5):455-461. Nunes H, Monnet I, Kannengiesser C, et al. Is telomeropathy the explanation for combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema syndrome?: report of a family with TERT mutation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. Mar 15 2014;189(6):753-754. Munson JC. Combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema: a high-pressure situation. Eur Respir J. Jan 2010;35(1):9-11. Behr J, Ryu JH. Pulmonary hypertension in interstitial lung disease. Eur Respir J. Jun 2008;31(6):1357-1367.
EP
55.
68.
69.
70.
71. 72.
22
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
78. 79.
80.
81.
82. 83.
84.
AC C
85.
RI PT
77.
SC
76.
M AN U
75.
TE D
74.
Cottin V, Le Pavec J, Prevot G, et al. Pulmonary hypertension in patients with combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema syndrome. Eur Respir J. Jan 2010;35(1):105-111. Sato T, Tsujino I, Tanino M, Ohira H, Nishimura M. Broad and heterogeneous vasculopathy in pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema with pulmonary hypertension. Respirol Case Rep. Sep 2013;1(1):10-13. Sugino K, Ota H, Fukasawa Y, Uekusa T, Homma S. Pathological characteristics in idiopathic nonspecific interstitial pneumonia with emphysema and pulmonary hypertension. Respirol Case Rep. Dec 2013;1(2):39-42. Arcasoy SM, Christie JD, Ferrari VA, et al. Echocardiographic assessment of pulmonary hypertension in patients with advanced lung disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. Mar 1 2003;167(5):735-740. Mercurio V, Carlomagno G, Fazio S. Response to pulmonary vasodilator treatment in a former smoker with combined interstitial lung disease complicated by pulmonary hypertension: case report and review of the literature. Heart Lung. Sep-Oct 2012;41(5):512-517. Cottin V. Clinical case: Combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema with pulmonary hypertension--clinical management. BMC Res Notes. 2013;6 Suppl 1:S2. de Torres JP, Bastarrika G, Wisnivesky JP, et al. Assessing the relationship between lung cancer risk and emphysema detected on low-dose CT of the chest. Chest. Dec 2007;132(6):1932-1938. Hubbard R, Venn A, Lewis S, Britton J. Lung cancer and cryptogenic fibrosing alveolitis. A population-based cohort study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. Jan 2000;161(1):5-8. Wilson DO, Weissfeld JL, Balkan A, et al. Association of radiographic emphysema and airflow obstruction with lung cancer. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. Oct 1 2008;178(7):738-744. Kwak N, Park CM, Lee J, et al. Lung cancer risk among patients with combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema. Respir Med. Mar 2014;108(3):524-530. Kitaguchi Y, Fujimoto K, Hanaoka M, Kawakami S, Honda T, Kubo K. Clinical characteristics of combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema. Respirology. Feb 2010;15(2):265-271. Mizushima Y, Kobayashi M. Clinical characteristics of synchronous multiple lung cancer associated with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. A review of Japanese cases. Chest. Nov 1995;108(5):1272-1277. Usui K, Tanai C, Tanaka Y, Noda H, Ishihara T. The prevalence of pulmonary fibrosis combined with emphysema in patients with lung cancer. Respirology. Feb 2011;16(2):326-331. Girard N, Marchand-Adam S, Naccache JM, et al. Lung cancer in combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema: a series of 47 Western patients. J Thorac Oncol. Aug 2014;9(8):1162-1170. Kumagai S, Marumo S, Yamanashi K, et al. Prognostic significance of combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema in patients with resected non-small-cell lung cancer: a retrospective cohort study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. Dec 2014;46(6):e113119. Cottin V, Freymond N, Cabane J, Cordier JF. Combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema syndrome in a patient age 28 years with severe systemic sclerosis. J Rheumatol. Sep 2011;38(9):2082-2083. Hwang JH, Misumi S, Sahin H, Brown KK, Newell JD, Lynch DA. Computed tomographic features of idiopathic fibrosing interstitial pneumonia: comparison
EP
73.
86.
87.
88.
89.
23
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
95.
96.
97.
98.
99.
100.
AC C
101.
RI PT
94.
SC
93.
M AN U
92.
TE D
91.
EP
90.
with pulmonary fibrosis related to collagen vascular disease. J Comput Assist Tomogr. May-Jun 2009;33(3):410-415. Poletti V, Ravaglia C, Buccioli M, et al. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: diagnosis and prognostic evaluation. Respiration. 2013;86(1):5-12. Papiris SA, Manali ED, Kolilekas L, et al. Clinical review: idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis acute exacerbations--unravelling Ariadne's thread. Crit Care. 2010;14(6):246. Saito H, Minamiya Y, Nanjo H, et al. Pathological finding of subclinical interstitial pneumonia as a predictor of postoperative acute respiratory distress syndrome after pulmonary resection. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. Feb 2011;39(2):190-194. Minegishi Y, Kokuho N, Miura Y, et al. Clinical features, anti-cancer treatments and outcomes of lung cancer patients with combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema. Lung Cancer. Aug 2014;85(2):258-263. Jankowich MD, Rounds S. Combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema alters physiology but has similar mortality to pulmonary fibrosis without emphysema. Lung. Oct 2010;188(5):365-373. Todd NW, Jeudy J, Lavania S, et al. Centrilobular emphysema combined with pulmonary fibrosis results in improved survival. Fibrogenesis Tissue Repair. 2011;4(1):6. Choi SH, Lee HY, Lee KS, et al. The value of CT for disease detection and prognosis determination in combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema (CPFE). PLoS One. 2014;9(9):e107476. Chae KJ, Jin GY, Han YM, et al. Prevalence and progression of combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema in asymptomatic smokers: A case-control study. Eur Radiol. Feb 14 2015. Bodlet A, Maury G, Jamart J, Dahlqvist C. Influence of radiological emphysema on lung function test in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Respir Med. Nov 2013;107(11):1781-1788. Sugino K, Ishida F, Kikuchi N, et al. Comparison of clinical characteristics and prognostic factors of combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema versus idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis alone. Respirology. Feb 2014;19(2):239-245. Cottin V, Cordier JF, Wells AU. Centrilobular emphysema combined with pulmonary fibrosis results in improved survival: a response. Fibrogenesis Tissue Repair. 2011;4:16. Tonnesen P, Carrozzi L, Fagerstrom KO, et al. Smoking cessation in patients with respiratory diseases: a high priority, integral component of therapy. Eur Respir J. Feb 2007;29(2):390-417. Long term domiciliary oxygen therapy in chronic hypoxic cor pulmonale complicating chronic bronchitis and emphysema. Report of the Medical Research Council Working Party. Lancet. Mar 28 1981;1(8222):681-686. McLaughlin VV, Archer SL, Badesch DB, et al. ACCF/AHA 2009 expert consensus document on pulmonary hypertension a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents and the American Heart Association developed in collaboration with the American College of Chest Physicians; American Thoracic Society, Inc.; and the Pulmonary Hypertension Association. J Am Coll Cardiol. Apr 28 2009;53(17):1573-1619. Oltmanns U, Kahn N, Palmowski K, et al. Pirfenidone in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: real-life experience from a German tertiary referral center for interstitial lung diseases. Respiration. 2014;88(3):199-207.
102.
103.
104.
25
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Figure Legends Figure 1 IPF
CPFE
Emphysema
FEV1
↓
↓ or N
↓
FVC
↓
↓ or N
↓
FEV1/FVC
↑
↓ or ↑ or N
↓
TLC
↓
↓ or ↑ or N
↑
FRC
↓
↓ or ↑ or N
↑
RV
↓
↓ or ↑ or N
↑
DLCO
↓
↓↓
↓
Desaturation during exercise
+
++
+
+
+
+
-
UIP
UIP or f-NSIP + Emphysema
Emphysema
+
++
+
++
+
Emphysema
-
Fibrosis
+
Pathological findings
Lung cancer risk
SC
TE D
Pulmonary Hypertension
M AN U
CT findings
RI PT
Pulmonary function tests
++
Abbreviations: IPF: Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis , CPFE: Combined Pulmonary Fibrosis and Emphysema, UIP: Usual Interstitial Pneumonia, f-NSIP: fibrotic Non
EP
Specific Interstitial Pneumonia, FEV1: Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second, FVC; Forced exhaled Vital Capacity, TLC: Total Lung Capacity, FRC: Functional Residual Capacity, RV: Residual Volume, DLCO: Diffusing capacity for Carbon Monoxide.
AC C
CT: computed tomography, N: Normal
Figures 2-6
Different distribution of the zones of fibrosis and emphysema in patients with CPFE Figure 2 (a-c) Fibrosis and emphysema are completely separated (emphysema in the upper zones and fibrosis in the bases)
26
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Figure 3 (a-c) Progressive transition between fibrosis and emphysema. Figure 4 (a-c) Paraseptal emphysematous lesions are also present at the bases of the lungs within the
RI PT
fibrotic lesions Figure 5 (a-c)
Thick walled cysts situated in the upper lung zones just beneath the chest wall
SC
Figure 6 (a-c)
Thick walled cysts grow within the areas of reticulation and/or honeycombing
M AN U
Figure 7 (a-c)
A CT scan of a 19 year old girl with an 8 years history of ILD. The CT revealed ground glass opacities and emphysema a diagnosis of a ABCA3 mutation was made. Figure 8 (a and b) and Figure 9 (a and b)
Figure 10 (a-d)
TE D
Lung cancer in two patients with CPFE
Acute exacerbation in a CPFE patient with lung cancer who underwent lobectomy of
Figure 11
EP
the right lower lobe, a and b: CT before surgery, c and d: CT after surgery.
AC C
Schematic representation of the different CPFE phenotypes. Abbreviations: CPFE: Combined Pulmonary Fibrosis and Emphysema, DAD: Diffuse Alveolar Damage, PH: Pulmonary Hypertension,
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
27
Table 1
RI PT
Radiological characteristics of CPFE
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
Radiographic characteristic Emphysema in the upper zones and fibrosis in the bases Progressive transition between emphysema and fibrosis Paraseptal emphysematous lesions at the bases of the lungs within the fibrotic lesions Large thick-walled cystic lesions (diameter ≥ 1 cm) delineated by a 1-mm-thick wall. These cysts can be situated either in the upper lungs just beneath the chest wall or grow within the areas of reticulation and/or honeycombing Centrilobular nodules which correspond to airway-centered fibrosis, (i.e. fibrotic changes along the respiratory bronchioles) Subpleural curvilinear opacities Ground Glass opacities Findings suggestive of pulmonary hypertension (i.e. dilatation of the central pulmonary arteries, enlargement of the right heart, reduction of peripheral branches of the pulmonary arteries and mosaic appearance of the pulmonary parenchyma)
References 38 38 38 37,38
37 37 1,16 37,43
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
28
Table 2
RI PT
Pathological characteristics of CPFE
M AN U
SC
Pathological findings Diffuse form of smoking-related interstitial lung disease: Overlap of pulmonary emphysema and fibrotic interstitial pneumonia (UIP or f-NSIP) Localized form of smoking-related interstitial lung disease: Presence of emphysema with fibrosis, air space enlargement with fibrosis, or occult fibrosis of smokers Fibrotic lesions along bronchioles around the emphysematous areas
References 55
55
56 41,55,57
Occult fibrosis of smokers or smoking related interstitial fibrosis (SRIF): Alveolar septal widening by collagen deposition along with emphysema and respiratory bronchiolitis both in subpleural areas and in deeper parenchyma, surrounded or not by emphysematous lesions
58
AC C
EP
TE D
Thick-walled cystic lesions involving one or more acini characterized by dense wall fibrosis, and occasional fibroblastic foci, surrounded by honeycombing and normal alveoli
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT •
In this review we provide information on the existing knowledge CPFE
•
Patients experience severe dyspnea, impaired gas exchange and preserved lung volumes
•
HRCT shows coexistence of emphysema and fibrosis in varying extent and locations Individual genetic background seems to predispose to the development CPFE
•
There is increased risk of developing pulmonary hypertension and lung cancer
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
•