Comment on “multistability, intermittency and remerging feigenbaum trees in an externally pumped ring cavity laser system”

Comment on “multistability, intermittency and remerging feigenbaum trees in an externally pumped ring cavity laser system”

Volume 116, number 7 PHYSICS LETTERS A 30 June 1986 COMMENT ON " M U L T I S T A B I L I T Y , I N T E R M r I T E N C Y AND R E M E R G I N G F E ...

135KB Sizes 0 Downloads 52 Views

Volume 116, number 7

PHYSICS LETTERS A

30 June 1986

COMMENT ON " M U L T I S T A B I L I T Y , I N T E R M r I T E N C Y AND R E M E R G I N G F E I G E N B A U M T R E E S IN AN EXTERNALLY P U M P E D R I N G CAVITY LASER S Y S T E M " Didier D A N G O I S S E and Pierre G L O R I E U X Laboratoire de Spectroscopie Hertzienne, associb au CNRS, Universitb de Lille L 59655 Villeneuve d'Ascq Cedex, France

Received 20 February 1986; accepted for publication 28 April 1986

Heffernan's bifurcation diagrams are shown to be scrambled by dynamic effects most probably due to a lack of convergence in his numerical calculations. Many of his conclusions have to be rejected.

In a recent letter [1] Heffernan claims he observed intermittency and multistability in a model of purely absorptive optical bistability. In that work, bifurcation diagrams for different values of the bistability parameter A (respectively input field Q) with the input field Q (respectively bistability parameter A) as control parameter are given. Although the author's interest is in " w h a t happens after many cavity lifetimes", we believe that these diagrams do not correspond to the actual limit points of the recurrent series which is used as a model of the Bloch-Maxwell equations in this case, namely Xn+ 1 Q - A x n / ( 1 + x2). This statement is based on the following: (i) the limit points of this series should be symmetric in the operation Q ~ - Q and x --* - x while the diagrams of figs. 4 and 5 of ref. [1] are not. (ii) The dissymetries present in these figures are characteristic of the dynamic deformation of a bifurcation diagram st~ch as what is observed even at very low "speed" when the control parameter is a function of time e.g. Q = Qo + at. When the rate a of variation of this control parameter is too high, the bifurcation points are shifted i.e. they are obtained at larger (respectively smaller) value than in the corresponding steady state diagrams when Q is increased (respectively decreased). The shape of the bifurcation diagram is also altered by dynamical effects. For instance, =

the first bifurcation from T to 2T periodic regime appears as a steep increase with an overshot when going from the T to the 2T region while it is softened with respect to the steady state at the 2T to T bifurcation. Dynamic deformations of bifurcation diagrams were reported recently by Kapral and Mandel for recurrent series [2] and by Midavaine et al. [3] and Brun et al. [4] for lasers. To support our interpretation of the diagrams of ref. [1] let us for example focus our attention on fig. 5 of ref. [1]. We have calculated the limits of the series used by Heffernan making sure that the displayed points are close to the asymptotic limit of the series within 10 -5 . The bifurcation diagrams obtained in this case reproduce well those obtained by Bier and Bountis [5] in the same case and the symmetry Q--. - Q , x ~ - x holds. On the other hand when the limit points are calculated assuming a quasi-continuity i.e. by using as initial value for x , ( Q ) the limit obtained for xn( Q -AQ) and iterating only once, the diagrams of Heffernan are reobtained when AQ is equal to 1 / 7 5 as illustrated in fig. 1. This figure reproduces bifurcation diagrams in both cases. Fig. l a has been obtained after checking the asymptotic value(s) while for fig. l b the quasi-continuity assumption as discussed above has been used. They clearly show that in the results of ref. [1] the limit points of the series were not reached and that this induces deformation or scrambling of the bifurca-

0375-9601/86/$03.50 © Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. (North-Holland Physics Publishing Division)

311

Volume 116, number 7

PHYSICS LETTERS A

tion d i a g r a m s similar to what is o b s e r v e d in the d y n a m i c regime. Fig. 1 has been given as an illustration of our statement. T h e s a m e holds for all the o t h e r bifurc a t i o n d i a g r a m s of ref. [1] (exception in fig. 3) which we have r e c a l c u l a t e d using the actual limit points. In the real d i a g r a m s , b u b b l e s a n d inverse F e i g e n b a u m trees a p p e a r as d e m o n s t r a t e d in ref.

x

2

/.~

H LL

/,.

H ~Z r CIZ

1

F-Z

-3

-'2

-~1 --INPUT

0 ~T ,

i

I

1 0

2

al 3

x2

30 June 1986

[5] b u t some of t h e m are usually " p a s s e d over" or s c r a m b l e d because of d y n a m i c a l effects. A s e m a n t i c p o i n t has also to be clarified. Heffernan claims that n o chaos is o b s e r v e d in this m a p p i n g since it is always fully deterministic. W e t h i n k that there has been now a general accept a n c e of the c o n c e p t of d e t e r m i n i s t i c chaos in m a n y fields of physics and chemistry [6] a n d H e f f e r n a n ' s s t a t e m e n t deserves some e x p l a n a t i o n since what is o b s e r v e d in his w o r k is a l m o s t exactly the chaos t h r o u g h a cascade of p e r i o d - d o u b l i n g b i f u r c a t i o n s which was one of the first clear insights into the routes leading to deterministic chaos [7]. Moreover, assigning a recurrent series to a differential e q u a t i o n requires some care if one w a n t s to get the same stability criteria for both. F o r instance the stability c o n d i t i o n of the fixed p o i n t s of xn+ 1 = Q - A x J ( 1 + x2~) of H e f f e r n a n differs f r o m that of the solution of d x / d r = Q - x A x / ( 1 + x2). To take care of this we could use for i n s t a n c e x , + 1 = Q / A - x , / A + x 3 / ( 1 + x~,) which has been o b t a i n e d b y rescaling the time by a factor of A. This series has the same fixed p o i n t s a n d stability c o n d i t i o n s as the a b o v e differential e q u a t i o n at least in the physically interesting region when A >t 1.

41 H LL

References

H

Z FA- 2

-Z:

b -'2

-'i INPUT

0~ FIELD

I~

2'

3

O

Fig. 1. Bifurcation diagrams of the series x,,+l = Q - Ax,/(1 + x 2) using (a) a check of the convergence at every point and (b) a quasi-continuity assumption. (b) reproduces well the results by Heffernan.

312

[1] D. Heffernan, Phys. Lett. A 108 (1985) 413; 109 (1985) 465 (E). [2] R. Kapral and P. Mandel, Phys. Rev. A 32 (1985) 1076. [3] T. Midavaine, D. Dangoisse and P. Glorieux, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55 (1985) 1989. [4] E. Brun, B. Derighetti, D. Meier, R. Holzner and M. Ravani, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 2 (1985) 156. [5] M. Bier and T. Bountis, Phys. Lett. A 104 (1984) 239. [6] H. Haken, Synergetics (Springer, Berlin, 1978). [7] M.J. Feigenbaum, J. Stat. Phys. 19 (1978) 25; C. Tresser and P. Coullet, C.R. Acad. Sci. A 287 (1978) 577.