Accepted Manuscript Comparative biotoxicity of N-Phenyl-1-naphthylamine and N-Phenyl-2-naphthylamine on cyanobacteria Microcystis aeruginosa Long Cheng, Yan He, Yun Tian, Biyun Liu, Yongyuan Zhang, Qiaohong Zhou, Zhenbin Wu PII:
S0045-6535(17)30298-9
DOI:
10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.02.110
Reference:
CHEM 18873
To appear in:
ECSN
Received Date: 10 October 2016 Revised Date:
4 February 2017
Accepted Date: 21 February 2017
Please cite this article as: Cheng, L., He, Y., Tian, Y., Liu, B., Zhang, Y., Zhou, Q., Wu, Z., Comparative biotoxicity of N-Phenyl-1-naphthylamine and N-Phenyl-2-naphthylamine on cyanobacteria Microcystis aeruginosa, Chemosphere (2017), doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.02.110. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Comparative biotoxicity of N-Phenyl-1-naphthylamine and
2
N-Phenyl-2-naphthylamine on cyanobacteria Microcystis aeruginosa
3
Long Cheng a,b, Yan He a,b, Yun Tian a,b, Biyun Liu a,*, Yongyuan Zhang a, Qiaohong
4
Zhou a,*, Zhenbin Wua
5
a
)
Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430072, China;
7
b
8
*Correspondence:
[email protected] (B. Liu)
SC
State Key Laboratory of Freshwater Ecology and Biotechnology, Institute of
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
M AN U
9
RI PT
1
[email protected] (Q. Zhou)
Abstract: N-Phenyl-1-naphthylamine (P1NA) and N-Phenyl-2-naphthylamine (P2NA)
11
are both widely used as antioxidant and plant secondary metabolites. In this study, growth,
12
esterase, photosynthetic activity and cell membrane integrity were used as biomarkers to
13
compare biotoxicity of P1NA and P2NA on Microcystis aeruginosa. According to the
14
results, a dose-response relationship was observed only between P1NA concentrations and
15
growth inhibition. The EC50 (48 h) of P1NA calculated from growth inhibition was 16.62
1)
µM, while that of P2NA was not detected. When the esterase and photosynthetic activity
17
were applied to evaluate the biotoxicity, it was found that a concentration of 20 µM P1NA,
18
P2NA caused reduction of esterase activity and Fv/Fm of M. aeruginosa to 22.2 and 3.3%,
19
97.5 and 92.1%, respectively, after 48 h exposure. The percentage of membrane-damaged
20
cells was increased as P1NA exposure concentration increased, but that was not detected
AC C
EP
TE D
10
1
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
when exposure to P2NA. The difference substituted position in the molecular structure of
22
P1NA and P2NA leads to different toxicological properties and only P1NA was found
23
highly toxic to M. aeruginosa. The toxicity is due to that only P1NA can be
24
biotransformed to 1,4-naphthoquinone, which could induce overproduction of
25
intracellular ROS as well as result in oxidative damage and growth inhibition of test
2)
organism.
27
Keywords:
28
aeruginosa; Toxic effects; Reactive oxygen species
29
1. Introduction
SC
RI PT
21
N-Phenyl-2-naphthylamine;
Microcystis
M AN U
N-Phenyl-1-naphthylamine;
N-Phenyl-1-naphthylamine (P1NA) serves as an antioxidant in various lubrication
31
oils and also as a protective agent in rubbers as well as rubber mixtures. (Koennecker et
32
al., 1998). It was estimated that the annual production of P1NA was 5800-6300 tons from
33
1986 to 1990 in the world (Koennecker et al., 1998). The distribution of P1NA was
34
predicted approximately 29% to water, 34% to sediment, 36% to soil, and less than 1%
35
each to air, suspended sediment, and biota in the environment using a Level II fugacity
3)
model (Mackay and Models, 2001; Koennecker et al., 1998). N-Phenyl-2-naphthylamine
37
(P2NA), the isomer of P1NA, also used as an additive jet oils and it is a byproduct in the
38
manufacture of P1NA (Winder and Balouet, 2002). It was reported that P1NA was
39
detected in river freshwater (2-7 µg L-1) and sediment (1-5 mg kg-1) near a small specialty
40
chemicals manufacturing ( Koennecker et al., 1998). And P2NA has been detected in
AC C
EP
TE D
30
2
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
41
sediments and freshwater in the proximity of chemical production sites in mg kg-1 and µg
42
L-1 concentrations (Brack et al., 1999; Altenburger et al., 2006). Studies performed according to standard protocols yielded LD50 of P1NA in male
44
and female Wistar rats of >5000 mg kg-1 body weight (Koennecker et al., 1998). Acute
45
oral toxicity test of P2NA indicated that its LD50 in rats and in mice were 8730 mg kg-1
4)
and 1450 mg kg-1 body weight (NTP, 1988). Due to P1NA and P2NA’s lipophilicity with
47
octanol-water partition coefficient, log KOW of 4.2 and 4.38, respectively, they may be
48
expected to have a considerable bio-accumulative potential in aquatic environments and
49
be toxic to aquatic organisms. The studies from laboratory tests with ciliates, Daphnia,
50
and fish indicated that P1NA was highly toxic to aquatic species. EC50 (48 h) for the
51
inhibition of cell proliferation of freshwater ciliates (Tetrahymena pyriformis), LC50 (48 h)
52
with young Daphnia magna and LC50 (96 h) in a flow-through system for rainbow trout
53
(Oncorhynchus mykiss) are, respectively, 2 mg L-1 (Epstein et al., 1967), 0.30 mg L-1, and
54
0.44-0.74 mg L-1 (Sikka et al., 1981). Phytoplankton is the fundamental part in the
55
aquatic ecosystems. However, there is little research about the toxicity of P1NA on
5)
phytoplankton.
SC
M AN U
TE D
EP
AC C
57
RI PT
43
Submerged plants can secrete secondary metabolites to inhibit photosynthetic
58
plankton in order to compete for light and nutrition dominance in the water environment.
59
This phenomenon is called allelopathy and the active substances are known as
)0
allelochemicals (Rice, 1984). In recent years, significant progress in the allelopathic
3
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
effect of submerged macrophyte on cyanobacteria has been made in both laboratory and
)2
field study. In respect of the mechanism of allelopathy, it was reported that aquatic plants
)3
release allelochemicals continually with low concentration, and caused persistent stress
)4
on target organisms. Under this condition, the intracellular signaling radicals (ROS, NO)
)5
were induced, as well as, the programmed cell death (PCD) was trigger in M. aeruginosa
))
which was confirmed by the hallmarks of PCD, caspase-3-like protease activity, DNA
)7
fragmentation, and destruction of cell ultrastructure (He et al., 2016). The engineering
)8
application of allelopathy through reconstructing the aquatic vegetation in the restoration
)9
of the subtropical eutrophic lake was studied. Ma et al. (2009) reported that
70
transformation of water in Yuehu Lake (66 ha), a shallow eutrophic lake in China, from
71
turbid algae green to a transparent state, was achieved by restoring the submerged
72
macrophyte community while the nitrogen and phosphorus are at the level of
73
eutrophication. Thus, it attracted the great interest of researchers to study the mechanism
74
of allelopathy. P1NA and P2NA as a kind of allelochemicals have been isolated and
75
identified in axenic as well as noaxenic root exudates of Eichhornia crassipes
7)
(Sultankhodzhaev and Tadzhibaev, 1976; Sun et al., 1993). These two substances have
77
also been detected in the culture medium of three submerged macrophytes (Elodea
78
nuttallii, Hydrilla verticillata and Vallisneria spiralis) by GC-MS (Gao et al., 2010).
79
Qian et al. (2009, 2010) studied the toxicity of allelochemical P2NA to Chlorella vulgaris
80
and M. aeruginosa. The only difference in molecular structure between P1NA and P2NA
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
)1
4
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
is that anilino-N substitutes at 1 and 2 positions of the naphthyl group. No information is
82
available about whether the toxicity of P1NA and P2NA on cyanobacteria is different and
83
how the toxicity is produced.
RI PT
81
The present study, M. aeruginosa, a dominant species of cyanobacterial blooming,
85
was chosen as a target species. The physiological and photosynthetic parameters i.e.
8)
growth inhibition, esterase activity, cell membrane integrity, and photosynthetic activity
87
were used as biomarkers to compare the toxicity between P1NA and P2NA. Moreover,
88
reactive oxygen specious (ROS) level was used to evaluate the toxicity mechanism. The
89
aim of this study was to (1) provide ecotoxicological information for evaluating the
90
toxicity of P1NA and P2NA to the cyanobacteria (M. aeruginosa) in future ecological risk
91
assessments and regulation of P1NA and P2NA use and discharges in aquatic ecosystems,
92
(2) elucidate toxicity and inhibition mechanism of P1NA and P2NA on cyanobacteria to
93
provide the base for further study the mechanism of allelopathic mechanism.
94
2. Materials and methods
95
2.1 Cultures conditions
M AN U
TE D
EP
AC C
9)
SC
84
Cyanobacteria, Microcystis aeruginosa FACHB 905 was provided by the Institute
97
of Hydrobiology of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. M. aeruginosa was cultured in
98
autoclaved BG11 media (Rippka et al., 1979) at 25 ±0.5
99
intensity of 18 µmol m-2 s-1 with a 12:12 h light: dark cycle. The cultures were shaken
100
three times per day by hands.
5
in an incubator under a light
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
101 102
2.2 Chemicals N-phenyl-1-naphthylamine (98.0%) and N-phenyl-2-naphthylamine (97.0%) were
103
commercially
104
2´,7´-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA), fluorescein diacetate (FDA) and
105
dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO, 99%) were all obtained from Sigma (St. Louis, Missouri,
10)
USA). Propidium Iodide (PI) was purchased from Sangon Co. Ltd (shanghai, China).
107
2.3 Toxicity assays
108
2.3.1 Experimental design
from
the
same
company
(TCI,
Tokyo,
Japan).
M AN U
SC
RI PT
obtained
Conical flasks (250 mL) and culture medium were prepared and autoclaved. 100 mL
110
culture media was added to each bottle. P1NA and P2NA were added with the
111
concentration of 0, 5, 10, 15, 20 µM, respectively. Then M. aeruginosa was inoculated
112
into each flask with the initial density of 1 × 106 cells mL−1 when it was at the
113
exponential growth phase. The samples were taken after 48 and 72 h for the measurement
114
of growth and other physiological parameters. The stock solutions of P1NA and P2NA
115
were prepared with DMSO which in test solution was less than 0.1% (v/v). 0.1% DMSO
11)
had no effects on the growth of M. aeruginosa (FACHB-905) (Gao et al., 2011). The
117
experimental conditions are the same to the cyanobacteria culture conditions shown
118
above. All the experiments were performed in triplicate.
119
2.3.2 Measurement of growth inhibition
120
AC C
EP
TE D
109
The cells density was measured by spectrophotometry at 680 nm. The regression
6
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
equation between cell density (y×103 cells mL-1) and OD680 (x) was calculated as follow:
122
y = 19735x – 33 (R2 = 0.9999). The inhibition ratio (IR) of cyanobacterial growth was
123
calculated according to the following Eq. (1):
124
IR = ( − )⁄ × 100%
RI PT
121
(1)
where N0 and Ns (cells mL-1) represent cell density in the control and treatment groups,
12)
respectively.
127
2.3.3 Measurement of esterase activity
SC
125
The fluorescein diacetate (FDA) assay has been used to indicate the metabolic
129
activity of cells (Dunker et al., 2013; Xiao et al., 2010, 2011). 5 µL of 1 g L-1 FDA was
130
added into 500 µL cells samples in a final concentration of 10 mg L-1 incubated for 15
131
min at room temperature in darkness. Then cells were analyzed by flow cytometer FACS
132
Verse (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey, USA) with excitation and emission
133
wavelength of 488 nm and 527/32 nm. As depicted by Hadjoudja et al. (2009), the
134
changes of esterase activity exposure to P1NA and P2NA were showed as the decrease in
135
the proportion of cells in the S2 regions (normal activity status) compared with control
13)
cells. Every sample was collected 10000 events.
137
2.3.4 Detection of cell membrane integrity
TE D
EP
AC C
138
M AN U
128
Cell membrane integrity was assessed by fluorescent dye PI which could interact
139
with nucleic acids to produce red fluorescence when the cell membrane was damaged
140
(Xiao et al., 2011). For the measurement of M. aeruginosa cell membrane integrity, 5 µL
7
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
of PI working solution was added to 500 µL of the sample with the final concentration of
142
15 µM and the sample was stained for 15 min in the dark at room temperature.
143
Fluorescence was collected through 586/42 nm with 488 nm laser. Data were expressed
144
as stained cell percentages.
145
2.3.5 Detection of intracellular ROS level
RI PT
141
The ROS level in M. aeruginosa was measured using the cell permeable indicator
147
2´,7´-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA) according to He et al. (2016).
148
The samples of cells were added with a final concentration of 10 µM DCFH-DA and
149
pre-incubation at 25°C in dark for 1 h. Sample fluorescence was measured using flow
150
cytometer with excitation and emission wavelength of 488 nm and 527/32 nm. To prove
151
the role of ROS in the P1NA induced growth inhibition, the BG11 culture mediums were
152
added with ROS scavenger ascorbic acid (0.5, 1 and 2 mM) and then adjusted to pH 7.1
153
with 1 M NaOH. The cells were pre-treated for 1 h and then exposed to 15 µM P1NA for
154
24 h. Growth inhibition in test organism was detected.
155
2.3.6 Photosynthesis activity analysis
M AN U
TE D
EP
AC C
15)
SC
14)
Maximum quantum yield (Fv/Fm), maximal electron transport rate (ETRmax) and
157
light use efficiency ratio (α) were selected to represent the M. aeruginosa photosynthesis
158
status. These values were measured using phyto-PAM analyzer (Walz, Effeltrich,
159
Germany) (Maxwell and Johnson, 2000).
1)0
2.3.7 Determination of P1NA and P2NA concentrations and metabolites
8
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
For analyzing the concentration of P1NA and P2NA, 2 mL culture samples were
1)2
extracted by equivalent ethyl acetate and then the extracts were dehydrated by anhydrous
1)3
sodium sulfate. The extracts being diluted 20 times were then transferred to auto-sampler
1)4
vials for gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) (Agilent 6890N/5973Inert,
1)5
Santa Clara, California, USA). The GC temperature profile consisted of an initial holding
1))
time of 2 min at 40
1)7
reaching a final temperature of 320
1)8
P2NA were 13.5 min and 13.9 min, respectively. The standard curve was prepared and the
1)9
equation for relation between peak area (y) and concentration (x)(µM) (0-1 µM) was as
170
follows: y = 70781x – 2533.9 (R2 = 0.991) and y = 268031x – 5141.2 (R2 = 0.997) for
171
P1NA and P2NA, respectively. The metabolites were qualitatively analyzed in M.
172
aeruginosa exposed to 20 µM of P1NA, P2NA and control group respectively. The
173
metabolites were determined by GC–MS, briefly as follows: 25 mL culture samples
174
(exposure for 72 h) were adjusted to pH 2 with 1 M HCl and extracted three times with
175
an equivalent volume of ethyl acetate. The following sample handling and determination
17)
condition were the same to the Lu et al. (2016).
177
2.4 Statistical analysis
SC
followed by a gradual increase in temperature of 20
min−1,
EP
TE D
M AN U
, held for 24 min. The retention time for P1NA and
AC C
178
RI PT
1)1
Flow cytometric analysis data were analyzed using FlowJo software (Tree Star
179
Software, San Carlos, California, USA). Data are presented in mean ± SD. One-way
180
ANOVA followed by LSD (when homogeneity of variance) or Tamhane's T2 (when
9
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
heterogeneity of variance) post hoc test was used to test for the differences between
182
individual means among P1NA or P2NA treatment at different concentrations.
183
Independent samples t-tests were used to compare the differences individual means when
184
at the same P1NA and P2NA concentration. Differences were considered to be significant
185
at p < 0.05. EC50 values were determined with probit regression. All the statistical
18)
analyses were performed using SPSS 18.0 software (IBM Corporation, Armonk, New
187
York, USA).
188
3 Results and discussion
189
3.1 Real concentrations of P1NA and P2NA concentrations during experiment
M AN U
SC
RI PT
181
In order to determine the real concentrations and stability of P1NA and P2NA, the
191
concentrations in culture medium were quantitatively analyzed at 0, 24, 48 and 72 h. The
192
results are shown in Fig 1. For nominal concentrations of 5, 10, 15, 20 µM, the real
193
exposure concentrations of P1NA were 4.75±0.018, 11.64±1.86, 14.89±0.27, 20.15±0.86
194
µM, respectively. The real exposure concentration of P2NA were 4.17±0.11, 10.62±0.48,
195
12.73±1.46, 19.90±0.17 µM, respectively. It can be found that the actually determining
19)
concentrations are close to the nominal concentrations. The average percentage error of
197
P1NA and P2NA was 5.7% and 9.6% between measured concentrations and nominal
198
values. The concentration of P1NA and P2NA decreased gradually over time in biotic and
199
abiotic conditions. And the decomposition rate of P1NA is faster than that of P2NA. For
200
instance, 20 µM of P1NA and P2NA in the culture medium were reduced by 59.2% and
AC C
EP
TE D
190
10
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
35.8% within 72 h. The half-life of P1NA was 24-50 h, while that of P2NA was 66-120 h
202
which was out of our experimental period calculated from the degradation patterns at 5,
203
10, 15, and 20 µM.
RI PT
201
We speculated that P1NA and P2NA concentrations decreased possibly due to the
205
reason that these substances can be adsorbed and metabolized by cyanobacteria or
20)
photochemically decomposed in the culture medium. Sikka et al. (1981) demonstrated
207
that P1NA was degraded with a half-life ranging from 4 to 11 days in water inoculated
208
with domestic sewage and lake water, respectively. A further experiment conducted in
209
aqueous solution, indicated that P1NA could be directly photochemically degraded (Sikka
210
et al. 1981). Meanwhile, on the basis of in vitro studies, metabolism of P1NA and P2NA
211
likely occurs primarily via hydroxylation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, 2015;
212
Koennecker et al., 1998; Weiss et al., 2007). 5 µM
10
15 µM
EP
15
10 µM
P1NA
AC C
Surplus (µ M)
20
TE D
M AN U
SC
204
20 µM
P2NA 15
10
5
5
0
0
20 µM in abiotic conditions
20
0 1
2
3
0
1
2
3
Time(day)
213 214
Fig 1. Real concentrations of P1NA and P2NA (µM) in the culture medium, during the experimental period.
215
Data are presented in mean ± SD.
11
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
21)
3.2 Effects of P1NA and P2NA on M. aeruginosa growth Cell growth inhibition is commonly used as a valid biomarker to evaluate the
218
phytotoxicity on cyanobacteria as it shows. Because it is an integrating parameter
219
showing toxicants inhibitory effects on all cellular metabolism (Dewez et al., 2008). The
220
inhibition effects of P1NA and P2NA on M. aeruginosa growth were studied after 48 and
221
72 h (Fig 2). It can be seen that when exposure to P1NA, the growth inhibition of M.
222
aeruginosa increased with an increasing concentration of P1NA. After 48 h, the inhibition
223
rates in the group of 5, 10, 15, 20 µM of P1NA were 4.0%, 6.9%, 40.6%, 69.4%,
224
respectively. However, those of P2NA were 0.3%, 3.1%, 0.6%, 0.3%, respectively. The
225
inhibition rates were 5.0%, 14.1%, 46.1%, 74.1%, respectively, exposure by P1NA after
22)
72 h. A significant dose-response and time-dependent relationship were displayed in
227
P1NA group, while these relationships for P2NA were not observed in the experiment.
228
Growth inhibition rates of P1NA exposed to 10, 15, 20 µM were higher than that of P2NA
229
at 48h, and the differences were 3.8%, 40.0%, 69.0%, respectively. It showed significant
230
differences (p< 0.05) with the exposure time for 48 h in the group of 10, 15 and 20 µM,
231
and with the exposure time for 72 h in the group of 15 and 20 µM, respectively.
SC
M AN U
TE D
EP
AC C
232
RI PT
217
The EC50 (48 h) value (Table S1) of P1NA calculated from growth inhibition was
233
16.616 µM (3.64 mg/L), while that of P2NA was not detected. The results showed that
234
only P1NA was highly toxic to M. aeruginosa. Koennecker et al., (1998) reported that
235
P1NA was low toxic to the animal but highly toxic to aquatic organisms. An EC50 (48h) of
12
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
2 mg L-1 of P1NA was measured for the inhibition of cell proliferation of freshwater
237
ciliates Tetrahymena pyriformis (Epstein et al., 1967). LC50 (48h) for young and adult
238
Daphnia magna were in the range of 0.30-0.68 mg L-1 (Koennecker et al., 1998). The
239
toxicity of P1NA to M. aeruginosa was similar to that of protozoa, which was lower than
240
that of cladoceran zooplankton. However, several studies have reported that P2NA is a
241
highly toxic substance to C. vulgaris (Qian et al., 2009), M. aeruginosa (Qian et al., 2010)
242
and Cylindrospermopsis raciborskii (Liu et al., 2015). The toxicity of P2NA may be
243
affected by the strain of the test organism or the culture conditions. The difference needs
244
to be furtherly studied in the future.
48h
***
**
60
C
C
40
0
5
10
EP
A a
A a
AC C
0
*
B a
a
15
a
*** D
80
D
60
P2NA
72h
***
80
20
245
P1NA
100
TE D
Growth Inhibition (%)
100
M AN U
SC
RI PT
23)
40
20
0
20
B c A a
b
A
0
5
10
c
15
c
20
P1NA/P2NA Concentration(µM)
24)
Fig 2. Effect of P1NA and P2NA on growth inhibition in M. aeruginosa. * (P<0.05), ** (P<0.01), and ***
247
(P<0.001) indicate significant differences between P1NA and P2NA. Different small letters in each figure in
248
the same type of growth inhibition represent statistically significant differences (p<0.05) compared to the
249
corresponding controls. Data are presented in mean ± SD.
250
3.3 Impact on esterase activity
13
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
The esterase activity in M. aeruginosa exposed to P1NA and P2NA for 48 and 72 h
252
were shown in Fig 3. It could be found that the esterase activity significantly decreased in
253
the group of 5 µM and 10 µM exposure to P1NA at 48 h. And then the esterase activity
254
drastically reduced with the increase of P1NA concentration, it declined to 70.2% and
255
22.2% of the proportion of cells in the S2 regions (normal activity status) (Hadjoudja et al.
25)
2009) with 15 µM and 20 µM of concentrations exposure to P1NA. The similar pattern
257
could be found in the group exposure for 72 h, while it did not further lower the esterase
258
activity. As opposed to P1NA, the esterase activity was invariant as P2NA concentrations
259
increased at 48 and 72 h.
M AN U
SC
RI PT
251
80
80
48 h
60
40
0
2)1 2)2
5
AC C
0
EP
20
2)0
P2NA
100
TE D
% S2 FDA Fluorescence
100
P1NA
10
72 h
60
40
20
0 15
20
0
5
10
15
20
P1NA/P2NA Concentration (µM)
Fig 3. Effect of P1NA and P2NA on esterase activity in M. aeruginosa. Data are presented in mean ± SD.
Esterase activity was commonly used to evaluate the metabolic status of the cell
2)3
because it was a rapid and sensitive endpoint (Valiente Moro et al., 2012), and usually, a
2)4
decline in enzyme activity indicated the presence of stress (Hadjoudja et al., 2009; Regel
2)5
et al., 2002). Herbicide paraquat and copper could result in reducing esterase activity due
14
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
to oxidative stress and showed a dose-response relationship in acute toxicity test for
2)7
phytoplankton (Hadjoudja et al., 2009; Prado et al., 2012). It indicated that the decline in
2)8
esterase activity exposure to P1NA being similar to paraquat and copper. And it gave an
2)9
information not only to be helpful to promptly determine the physiological state of cells
270
but also to evaluate the toxicity of pollutants. The change of esterase activity along with
271
growth inhibition suggested that the toxicity of P1NA and P2NA to M. aeruginosa had an
272
obvious difference.
273
3.4 Inhibition of photosynthetic activity
M AN U
SC
RI PT
2))
In the present study, maximum quantum yield (Fv/Fm), maximal electron transport
275
rate (ETRmax) and light use efficiency ratio (α) were used to estimate the efficiency of
27)
PSII in M. aeruginosa. PSII efficiency in M. aeruginosa exposure to P1NA and P2NA are
277
shown in Fig 4. The results showed that Fv/Fm has significantly decreased in the group
278
of 15 and 20 µM P1NA exposure for 48 and 72 h (p < 0.05) (Fig 3A, 3B). It was different
279
when exposure to P2NA. At 48 h, Fv/Fm was significantly decreased in the group of 10,
280
15 and 20 µM P2NA (p<0.05). But every concentration of the P2NA treatment group did
281
not have any differences at 72 h (p> 0.05) which was consistent with the trend of growth
282
inhibition. There was a significant difference between P1NA and P2NA in the group of 15
283
and 20 µM at 48 and 72 h. The effects on ETRmax and α are shown in Fig 4C, 4D and
284
Fig 4E, 4F, respectively. P1NA treatment led to a significant decrease in ETRmax or α
285
values at high concentration, while exposure of P2NA slightly reduced them. It was much
AC C
EP
TE D
274
15
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
28)
similar to the change of Fv/Fm values. The P1NA caused a severe toxicity on PSII of the cyanobacteria M. aeruginosa, as
288
introduced above. These results were consistent with the growth and esterase activity of
289
M. aeruginosa. It is known that the value of Fv/Fm characterizes the content of
290
photochemically active centers of PSII and indicates the current balance between
291
processes of light destruction and the reparation of PSII (Brack and Frank, 1998).
292
Similarly, some kinds of exogenous substances such as tetracycline and natural
293
flavonoids were found to inhibit growth and reduce Fv/Fm values in M. aeruginosa and
294
Selenastrum capricornutum (Huang et al., 2015; Yang et al., 2013). Allelochemicals
295
identified from Myriophyllum spicatum, including pyrogallic acid, gallic acid, ellagic acid
29)
and (+)-catechin caused significant reductions of PSII efficiency and whole electron
297
transport chain activities in M. aeruginosa (Zhu et al., 2010). The decrease of the
298
ETRmax suggested that stress resulting from exposure to P1NA and P2NA had inhibitory
299
effects on the donor side of PSII in M. aeruginosa. Blockage of electron transfer chain
300
accompanied by a decrease in Fv/Fm (Han et al., 2008; Liu et al., 2015). In M.
301
aeruginosa, the initial effect concentrations showing a significant difference between
302
P1NA and P2NA for ETRmax (5 µM) was lower than that for Fv/Fm (10 µM) for 48 h.
303
The disparity between the responses of Fv/Fm and ETRmax reflects inhibition
304
downstream of PS II, suggesting that the down-regulation of PS II electron transport is a
305
result of inhibition of Calvin cycle enzymes and Rubisco (Han et al., 2008; Yu et al.,
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
287
16
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
2002). But in general, though P2NA can slightly weaken the photosynthesis of M.
307
aeruginosa, it is no doubt that the toxicity is different between P1NA and P2NA in M.
308
aeruginosa.
Fv/Fm--maximal quantum yield (A) 48h
∗
0.6 0.5
A a
A a
A
∗∗∗
∗∗
b
0.5
B
0.4
0.2
0.2
0.1 5
10
15
(B)
B a
∗∗∗
∗∗
a
a
C
0.1
C 0
A a
M AN U
0.3
0.0
AB a
0.4
0.3
P2NA
72h
0.6
bc
c
P1NA
0.7
SC
0.7
RI PT
30)
0.0
20
0
5
D 10
15
20
2
140 120 100
ETRmax--maximal electron transport ratio(m s) 140
A a
∗∗ 48h
∗ A
A b
b
60 40
B
b
∗∗∗
5
10
∗∗
AB
b
∗
72h
A a
A b
∗
A c
AC C
0.25 0.20
15
b
b
48h (E)
∗∗
∗∗∗ bc
c
20 0
D 0
5
10
309 310
5
15 P1NA
P2NA
72h (F) 0.25
A a
A b
A b
∗
B
0.20
20
∗∗∗ b
b
0.15 0.10
0.05
0
c
C b
40
0.30
0.10
0.00
∗∗∗
60
20
B
0.15
(D)
B
α--light use efficiency ratio 0.30
P2NA
80
EP
0
A a
100
C
20 0
∗
120
TE D
80
(C)
P1NA
0.05
C
C 10
15
20
0.00
0
5
10
15
20
P1NA/P2NA Concentration (µM) Fig 4. Effects of P1NA and P2NA on Fv/Fm (A, B), ETRmax (C, D) and α (E, F) in M. aeruginosa. (F). *
17
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
(P<0.05), ** (P<0.01), and *** (P<0.001) indicate significant differences at the same concentration of
312
P1NA and P2NA. Different small letters in each figure in the same type of Fv/Fm, ETRmax or α represent
313
statistically significant differences (p<0.05) compared to the corresponding controls without P1NA or
314
P2NA.
315
3.5 Effect on cell membrane integrity
RI PT
311
The percentage of PI-stained cells of M. aeruginosa exposure to P1NA and P2NA
317
are presented in Fig 5. After 48 h, percentage of cells stained by PI exposed to 5, 10, 15,
318
20 µM, of P1NA were 7.0%, 7.6%, 21.3%, 61.4%, respectively. However, that of P2NA
319
were 3.2%, 3.2%, 3.4%, 3.3%, respectively. It showed that as P1NA concentration
320
increased, the PI positive cell percentage was increased in a dose-response relationship
321
and it had a significant difference in every P1NA concentration being tested compared to
322
the control (p < 0.05). However, there was no change in the integrity of the cell
323
membrane in M. aeruginosa when exposure to P2NA (P > 0.05). And it all showed a
324
significant difference in same exposure concentration between P1NA and P2NA (p <
325
0.05).
M AN U
TE D
EP
AC C
32)
SC
31)
Cells stained by PI is a recognized method being used to probe cell membrane
327
integrity for the assessment of the environmental impact of toxic contaminants in aquatic
328
systems. Herbicide paraquat and allelochemical tannic acid have been reported to lead
329
damages to the membrane integrity of phytoplankton cells indicating a reduction in the
330
percentage of viable cells exposed to that agent (Eigemann et al., 2013; Prado et al.,
18
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
2009). Studies reported that aquatic plants such as E. crassipes (Sultankhodzhaev and
332
Tadzhibaev, 1976; Sun et al., 1993), Elodea nuttallii, Hydrilla verticillata and Vallisneria
333
spiralis (Gao et al., 2010) could secrete P1NA and P2NA, which showed high allelopathic
334
activity. Xiao et al. (2010) indicated that assay of cell membrane integrity was a novel
335
and fast method to determine whether the antialgal agents were algicidal (killing algae) or
33)
algistatic (preventing algal growth). This paper suggested that P1NA has the nature of
337
killing cyanobacteria together with growth assays and cell membrane integrity tests. The
338
studies indicated that P1NA is the allelochemical which shows higher inhibitory activities
339
to cyanobacteria than that of P2NA.
M AN U
SC
RI PT
331
P1NA
80
∗∗∗
48h
D
40
TE D
60
∗∗∗
∗∗∗
20
A a a 0
B a 5
AC C
0
∗∗∗
B
10
a
∗∗∗
40
C
C
EP
PI Positive (%)
60
∗∗∗
72h
D
340
P2NA
80
a
a
15
20
∗ A a
B a
0
5
∗∗∗ B
a
a
a
0 20
10
15
20
P1NA/P2NA Concentration (µM)
341
Fig 5. Effect of P1NA and P2NA on cell membrane integrity in M. aeruginosa. * (P<0.05), ** (P<0.01), and
342
*** (P<0.001) indicate significant differences between P1NA and P2NA. Different small letters in each
343
figure in the same type of growth inhibition represent statistically significant differences (p<0.05)
344
compared to the corresponding controls. Data are presented in mean ± SD.
345
A comparison of the sensitivity tested by different endpoints including growth
19
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
inhibition, esterase activity, cell membrane integrity and the efficiency of photosynthesis
347
was performed. And the EC50 values of P1NA were given in Table S1. The EC50 values
348
based on growth inhibition, esterase activity, cell membrane integrity and Fv/Fm were
349
16.616, 17.445, 16.099, 19.604 µM, respectively, which were not far from each other.
350
These results suggested that the parameters being tested were effective endpoints in acute
351
toxicity test. However, EC50 values of P2NA was not detected in same conditions in this
352
study. All results shown above indicated that the acute toxicity test of P1NA and P2NA in
353
M. aeruginosa exhibited significant difference.
354
3.6 Toxic mechanism of P1NA
M AN U
SC
RI PT
34)
Oxidative damage induced by ROS has been proved to be the reason resulting in
35)
the toxic effect of chemical toxicants such as anthraquinone derivative (Schrader et al.,
357
2005) and pyrogallic acid (Lu et al., 2016) to phytoplankton. To reveal the possible
358
mechanism of the different toxicity between P1NA and P2NA, the intracellular ROS level
359
was measured. From Fig 6, the remarkable increase in intracellular ROS levels with the
3)0
increase of P1NA concentration was observed after 48h exposure (p < 0.05). The ROS
3)1
level in the group of 5, 10, 15, 20 µM P1NA were 1.31, 1.75, 2.46, 2.83 times higher than
3)2
that of control, respectively. However, a significant dose-response relationship was not
3)3
found in the group exposure to P2NA, in which slight lower level than the control was
3)4
observed.
AC C
EP
TE D
355
20
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
P1NA
3.0
P2NA
RI PT
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0 0
5
10
SC
ROS relative intisity
2.5
15
20
M AN U
P1NA/P2NA Concentration (µM)
3)5 3))
Fig 6. Intracellular ROS level in M. aeruginosa exposure to P1NA and P2NA for 48 h. Relative ROS level
3)7
was reflected by the mean fluorescence intensity of DCF. Data are presented in mean ± SD.
ROS including O2·-, H2O2 and ·OH are produced by the normal metabolic process
3)9
and maintain a dynamic balance with the antioxidant system in organisms. The
370
overproduction of ROS in phytoplankton was in response to toxicants with redox-cycling
371
property and adverse environmental stresses (Wang et al., 2012; Yang et al., 2011). It was
372
reported that the acute increase of ROS induced by gramine could be a potential cause of
373
the growth inhibition of cyanobacteria (Hong et al., 2009). In addition, it has been also
374
demonstrated that the overproduction of ROS affected cell growth or proliferation. For
375
example, Wang et al. (2011) reported that allelochemicals (+)-catechin and pyrogallic
37)
acid can induce the generation of intracellular ROS to inhibit the growth of two
377
freshwater algae.
AC C
EP
TE D
3)8
21
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
As is known that high level of ROS can directly damage proteins, nucleic acids, and
379
cell membrane (Yu et al., 2007), finally leading to growth inhibition and cell death. In
380
order to evaluate the effects of ROS level on the growth inhibition, the decrease of
381
esterase activity, Fv/Fm, and cell membrane integrity, the relevance between ROS and
382
these four parameters was analyzed. The regression curve and correlation coefficients (R2)
383
were given in Table S2. The R2 between ROS and these four parameters mentioned above
384
were 0.892, 0.781, 0.694, 0.694, respectively. It suggested that increased ROS level was
385
the major mechanism contributing to the growth inhibition of M. aeruginosa exposure to
38)
P1NA under the experimental conditions. In addition, the regression analysis was done for
387
the relationships between the growth inhibition effect and ROS, esterase activity, Fv/Fm
388
and cell membrane integrity.
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
378
To furtherly verify the role of ROS in the growth inhibition of M. aeruginosa
390
exposed to P1NA, the protective effect of ascorbic acid, a kind of free radical scavenger,
391
was investigated. As illustrated in Fig S1, growth inhibition induced by 15 µM P1NA in
392
M. aeruginosa was significantly alleviated after the treatments of ascorbic acid. Ascorbic
393
acid was the widely and water-soluble antioxidant for the prevention or minimization of
394
damages caused by ROS in plants (Khan and Ashraf, 2008). Lu et al. (2016)
395
demonstrated that ascorbic acid could decrease the DNA strand breaks of M. aeruginosa
39)
exposed to pyrogallic acid. The result of ROS scavenger experiments demonstrated that
397
the excessive formation of ROS induced by P1NA was the main cause leading to growth
AC C
EP
389
22
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
398
inhibition in M. aeruginosa. In vitro studies have demonstrated that P1NA was primarily metabolized via
400
hydroxylation (Koennecker et al., 1998) to form Mono- and dihydroxy-metabolites
401
(Sikka et al., 1981; Wolff, 1992). However, only the monohydroxy-metabolites
402
6-hydroxy-N-phenyl-2-naphthylamine and 4′- hydroxy-N-phenyl-2-naphthylamine were
403
detected after exposure with P2NA (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, 2015; Weiss et al.,
404
2007). Dihydroxy-metabolites can form quinone while monohydroxy-metabolites not. As
405
summarized previously (O’brien, 1991), oxidative stress arises when the quinone is
40)
reduced by reductases to a semiquinone radical which reduces oxygen to superoxide
407
radicals and reforms the quinone. Wang et al. (2011) reported that polyphenolic
408
allelochemicals such as (+)-catechin and pyrogallic acid could elevate cellular ROS level
409
through futile redox cycles, which amplify the generation of O2.- with the expense of
410
NAD(P)H and greatly enhance the toxicity to the target organisms. The results suggested
411
that the generation of ROS was related to the biotransformation metabolites of P1NA.
412
Therefore, the metabolites of P1NA and P2NA in M. aeruginosa were detected by GC/MS.
413
1,4-naphthoquinone was found in M. aeruginosa exposure to P1NA, while it was not
414
detected in P2NA and control groups (Fig S2). We speculated P1NA metabolized to form
415
1,4-dihydroxynaphthalene firstly. It was similar to (+)-catechin and pyrogallic acid which
41)
may cause autoxidation or enzymatic oxidation to easily form semiquinone radical in the
417
target organism. The reactive semiquinone radical is able to react with O2 to produce
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
399
23
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
o-quinone form of 1,4-dihydroxynaphthalene accompanying the production of O2.-.
419
Dismutation of O2.- produces H2O2, and then H2O2 can be reduced via the Fenton-type
420
reaction in the presence of transition metals to form the ·OH. Therefore, it is reasonable
421
to expect that the metabolites of P1NA may undergo futile redox cycling in the presence
422
of intracellular reductants such as NAD(P)H (O’brien, 1991) and induce ROS production
423
in M. aeruginosa. A possible pathway of ROS generation in M. aeruginosa induced by
424
P1NA could be proposed as shown in Fig 7. In brief, it was the first time to demonstrate
425
that P1NA exhibited remarkably stronger growth inhibition effects in M. aeruginosa than
42)
its isomer P2NA. The different property in inducing excessive ROS between P1NA and
427
P2NA was the important reason to exhibit different toxicity in M. aeruginosa. The
428
formation of 1,4-naphthoquinone was the key factor to generate excessive ROS.
429
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
418
430
Fig 7. A possible pathway of ROS production induced by P1NA in M. aeruginosa.
431
4 Conclusion
432
The results of comparing the toxicity of P1NA and P2NA indicated that only P1NA
433
was highly toxic to M. aeruginosa. The 48 h EC50 values based on growth inhibition were
24
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
16.616 µM, while that of P2NA was not detected in same conditions. The intracellular
435
ROS levels were significantly increased in M. aeruginosa exposure to P1NA, while it was
43)
not found in the group of P2NA. Attention should be paid to the influence of P1NA on
437
other aquatic organisms and aquatic ecosystem. In the research field of allelopathy, the
438
toxic effect of P1NA on phytoplankton should be investigated as the main object
439
compared with P2NA.
440
Acknowledgements
SC
RI PT
434
The study was financially supported by the National Nature Science Foundation of
442
China (grant number 51178452, 50909091 and 31123001), the Major Science and
443
Technology Program for Water Pollution Control and Treatment of China 12th Five-Year
444
Plan (grant number 2012ZX07101007-005), and the State Key Laboratory of Freshwater
445
Ecology and Biotechnology Program (grant number 2013FB20). The authors thank
44)
Liping Zhang and Yan Wang at Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences
447
for assistance in using GC-MS and flow cytometer.
448
REFERENCES
449
Altenburger, R., Brack, W., Greco, W.R., Grote, M., Jung, K., Ovari, A., Riedl, J.,
451 452 453
TE D
EP
AC C
450
M AN U
441
Schwab, K., Küster, E., 2006. On the Mode of Action of N -Phenyl-2-naphthylamine in Plants. Environ. Sci. Technol. 40, 6163–6169. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es060338e.
Brack, W., Altenburger, R., Ensenbach, U., Möder, M., Segner, H., Schüürmann, G.,
25
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
1999. Bioassay-directed identification of organic toxicants in river sediment in the
455
industrial region of Bitterfeld (Germany)-a contribution to hazard assessment. Arch.
45)
Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 37, 164–174. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/S002449900502.
457
RI PT
454
Brack, W., Frank, H., 1998. Chlorophyll a Fluorescence: A Tool for the Investigation of Toxic Effects in the Photosynthetic Apparatus. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 40, 34–41.
459
http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/eesa.1997.1639.
4)0
SC
458
Dewez, D., Didur, O., Vincent-Héroux, J., Popovic, R., 2008. Validation of photosynthetic-fluorescence parameters as biomarkers for isoproturon toxic effect
4)2
on alga Scenedesmus obliquus. Environ. Pollut. 151, 93–100.
4)3
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2007.03.002.
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, 2015. N-Phenyl-2-naphthylamine (MAK Value
TE D
4)4
M AN U
4)1
4)5
Documentation, 2011
4))
Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/3527600418.mb13588e5014.
4)9 470 471
EP
4)8
Dunker, S., Jakob, T., Wilhelm, C., 2013. Contrasting effects of the cyanobacterium Microcystis aeruginosa on the growth and physiology of two green algae, Oocystis
AC C
4)7
. The MAK Collection for Occupational Health and Safety;
marsonii and Scenedesmus obliquus, revealed by flow cytometry. Freshw. Biol. 58, 1573–1587. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/fwb.12143.
Eigemann, F., Hilt, S., Schmitt-Jansen, M., 2013. Flow cytometry as a diagnostic tool for
472
the effects of polyphenolic allelochemicals on phytoplankton. Aquat. Bot. 104, 5–14.
473
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquabot.2012.10.005.
26
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
474
Epstein, S.S., Saporoschetz, I.B., Hutner, S.H., 1967. Toxicity of antioxidants to Tetrahymena pyriformis. J. Protozool. 14, 238–244.
47)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1550-7408.1967.tb01991.x.
RI PT
475
Görner, H., Miskolczy, Z., Megyesi, M., Biczók, L., 2011. Photooxidation of Alkaloids:
478
Considerable Quantum Yield Enhancement by Rose Bengal-sensitized Singlet
479
Molecular Oxygen Generation. Photochem. Photobiol. 87, 1315–1320.
480
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-1097.2011.00994.x.
M AN U
481
SC
477
Gao YN. 2010. Studies on the allelopathy of exudates from three submerged
482
hydrocharitaceae specieson to Microcystis aeruginosa. Ph.D. thesis, Institute of
483
Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, China. Gao, Y.N., Liu, B.Y., Xu, D., Zhou, Q.H., Hu, C.Y., Ge, F.J., Zhang, L.P., Wu, Z. Bin,
TE D
484
2011. Phenolic compounds exuded from two submerged freshwater macrophytes
48)
and their allelopathic effects on microcystis aeruginosa. Polish J. Environ. Stud. 20,
487
1153 1159.
489 490 491
Gross, E.M., Meyer, H., Schilling, G., 1996. Release and ecological impact of algicidal
AC C
488
EP
485
hydrolysable polyphenols in Myriophyllum spicatum. Phytochemistry 41, 133–138. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0031-9422(95)00598-6.
Hadjoudja, S., Vignoles, C., Deluchat, V., Lenain, J.F., Le Jeune, A.H., Baudu, M., 2009.
492
Short term copper toxicity on Microcystis aeruginosa and Chlorella vulgaris using
493
flow cytometry. Aquat. Toxicol. 94, 255–264.
27
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
494 495
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2009.07.007. Han, T., Kang, S.H., Park, J.S., Lee, H.K., Brown, M.T., 2008. Physiological responses of Ulva pertusa and U. armoricana to copper exposure. Aquat. Toxicol. 86, 176–
497
184. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2007.10.016.
498
RI PT
49)
He, Y., Zhou, Q.H., Liu, B.Y., Cheng, L., Tian, Y., Zhang, Y.Y., Wu, Z.B., 2016.
Programmed cell death in the cyanobacterium Microcystis aeruginosa induced by
500
allelopathic effect of submerged macrophyte Myriophyllum spicatum in co-culture
501
system. J. Appl. Phycol. 1–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10811-016-0814-7.
M AN U
502
SC
499
Hong, Y., Hu, H.Y., Li, F.M., 2008. Physiological and biochemical effects of allelochemical ethyl 2-methyl acetoacetate (EMA) on cyanobacterium Microcystis
504
aeruginosa. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 71, 527–534.
505
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2007.10.010
50)
TE D
503
Hong, Y., Hu, H.Y., Xie, X., Sakoda, A., Sagehashi, M., Li, F.M., 2009. Gramine-induced growth inhibition, oxidative damage and antioxidant responses in
508
freshwater cyanobacterium Microcystis aeruginosa. Aquat. Toxicol. 91, 262–269.
AC C
509
EP
507
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2008.11.014.
510
Huang, H., Xiao, X., Ghadouani, A., Wu, J., Nie, Z., Peng, C., Xu, X., Shi, J., 2015.
511
Effects of natural flavonoids on photosynthetic activity and cell integrity in
512
Microcystis aeruginosa. Toxins (Basel). 7, 66–80.
513
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxins7010066
28
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
514
Khan, A., Ashraf, M., 2008. Exogenously applied ascorbic acid alleviates salt-induced oxidative stress in wheat. Environ. Exp. Bot. 63, 224–231.
51)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2007.10.018.
518 519
Koennecker, G., Mangelsdorf, I., Wibbertmann, A., 1998. N-phenyl-1-naphthylamine. Ipcs Concise Int. Chem. Assess. Doc. 12, 1–25.
Liu, R., Ran, X., Bai, F., Xu, J., Yang, S., Shi, J., Wu, Z., 2015. Use of chlorophyll a
SC
517
RI PT
515
fluorescence to elucidate the toxicity target of N-phenyl-2-naphthylamine on
521
photosynthetic system of Cylindrospermopsis raciborskii (Cyanobacteria).
522
Phycologia 54, 12–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.2216/14-050.1
523
M AN U
520
Lu, Z., Zhang, Y., Gao, Y., Liu, B., Sun, X., He, F., Zhou, Q., Wu, Z., 2016. Effects of pyrogallic acid on Microcystis aeruginosa: oxidative stress related toxicity.
525
Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 132, 413–419.
52)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2016.06.039
529 530
EP
528
Ma, J.M., Cheng, S.P., He, F., Zuo, J.C., Zhao, Q., Zhang, Z., Wu, J., Wu, Z.B, 2009. Practice and implication of establishing aquatic vegetation in Lake Yuehu in Wuhan,
AC C
527
TE D
524
China. Acta Hydrobiol. Sin. 33, 222–229. http://dx.doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.0000.2009.20222
531
Mackay, D., Models, M.E., 2001. The Fugacity Approach. Lewis Publ.
532
Maxwell, K., Johnson, G.N., 2000. Chlorophyll fluorescence-a practical guide. J. Exp.
533
Bot. 51, 659–668. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jexbot/51.345.659.
29
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
534
Nakai, S., Inoue, Y., Hosomi, M., 2001. Algal growth inhibition effects and inducement modes by plant-producing phenols. Water Res. 35, 1855–1859.
53)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00444-9.
537
Nakai, S., Yamada, S., Hosomi, M., 2005. Anti-cyanobacterial fatty acids released from Myriophyllum spicatum. Hydrobiologia 543, 71–78.
539
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10750-004-6822-7.
SC
538
540
RI PT
535
US NTP, 1988. Toxicology and Carcinogenesis Studies of N-Phenyl-2-naphthylamine in F344/N Rats and B6C3F1 Mice (feed studies). US National Toxicology Program,
542
http://ntp-server.niehs.nih.gov/htdocs/lt-studies/tr333.html.
544
O’brien, P.J., 1991. Molecular mechanisms of quinone cytotoxicity. Chem. Biol. Interact. 80, 1–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0009-2797(91)90029-7.
TE D
543
M AN U
541
Prado, R., García, R., Rioboo, C., Herrero, C., Abalde, J., Cid, A., 2009. Comparison of
54)
the sensitivity of different toxicity test endpoints in a microalga exposed to the
547
herbicide paraquat. Environ. Int. 35, 240–247.
548
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2008.06.012.
550 551 552 553
AC C
549
EP
545
Prado, R., Rioboo, C., Herrero, C., Suárez-Bregua, P., Cid, Á., 2012. Flow cytometric analysis to evaluate physiological alterations in herbicide-exposed Chlamydomonas moewusii cells. Ecotoxicology 21, 409–420. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10646-011-0801-3. Qian, H., Xu, X., Chen, W., Jiang, H., Jin, Y., Liu, W., Fu, Z., 2009. Allelochemical
30
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
stress causes oxidative damage and inhibition of photosynthesis in Chlorella
555
vulgaris. Chemosphere 75, 368–375.
55)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.12.040
557
RI PT
554
Qian, H., Yu, S., Sun, Z., Xie, X., Liu, W., Fu, Z., 2010. Effects of copper sulfate,
hydrogen peroxide and N-phenyl-2-naphthylamine on oxidative stress and the
559
expression of genes involved photosynthesis and microcystin disposition in
5)0
Microcystis aeruginosa. Aquat. Toxicol. 99, 405–412.
5)1
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2010.05.018.
M AN U
5)2
SC
558
Regel, R.H., Ferris, J.M., Ganf, G.G., Brookes, J.D., 2002. Algal esterase activity as a biomeasure of environmental degradation in a freshwater creek. Aquat. Toxicol. 59,
5)4
209–223. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0166-445X(01)00254-5.
TE D
5)3
5)5
Rice, E.L., 1984. Allelopathy, 2nd edn. Academic, Orlando, pp 1–2.
5))
Rippka, R., Deruelles, J., Waterbury, J.B., Herdman, M., Stanier, R.Y., 1979. Generic assignments, strain histories and properties of pure cultures of cyanobacteria. J. Gen.
5)8
Microbiol. 111, 1–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/00221287-111-1-1
EP
5)7
Schrader, K.K., Dayan, F.E., Nanayakkara, N.P.D., 2005. Generation of reactive oxygen
570
species by a novel anthraquinone derivative in the cyanobacterium Planktothrix
571 572 573
AC C
5)9
perornata (Skuja). Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 81, 198–207. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pestbp.2004.11.004.
Shao, J., Xu, Y., Wang, Z., Jiang, Y., Yu, G., Peng, X., Li, R., 2011. Elucidating the
31
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
toxicity targets of β-ionone on photosynthetic system of Microcystis aeruginosa
575
NIES-843 (Cyanobacteria). Aquat. Toxicol. 104, 48–55.
57)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2011.03.014.
577
RI PT
574
Sikka.H.C, Pack.E.J, Sugatt.R.H, Banerjee.S, Rosenberg.A, 1981. Environmental fate
and effects of N-phenyl-1-naphthylamine and its disposition and metabolism in the
579
rat. Syracuse Res. Co. 106.
580
SC
578
Sultankhodzhaev, M.N., Tadzhibaev, M.M., 1976. N-phenyl-β-naphthylamine from three species of plants. Chem. Nat. Compd. 12, 361.
582
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00567836.
584
Sun, W., Yu, S., Yang, S., Wu, H., 1993. Allelochemicals from root exudates of water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes). Acta Phytophysiol. Sin.
TE D
583
M AN U
581
Valiente Moro, C., Bricheux, G., Portelli, C., Bohatier, J., 2012. Comparative effects of
58)
the herbicides chlortoluron and mesotrione on freshwater microalgae. Environ.
587
Toxicol. Chem. 31, 778–786. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/etc.1749.
589 590 591
Wang, G., Deng, S., Li, C., Liu, Y., Chen, L., Hu, C., 2012. Damage to DNA caused by
AC C
588
EP
585
UV-B radiation in the desert cyanobacterium Scytonema javanicum and the effects of exogenous chemicals on the process. Chemosphere 88, 413–417. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.02.056.
592
Wang, J., Zhu, J., Liu, S., Liu, B., Gao, Y., Wu, Z., 2011. Generation of reactive oxygen
593
species in cyanobacteria and green algae induced by allelochemicals of submerged
32
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
594
macrophytes. Chemosphere 85, 977–982.
595
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.06.076. Weiss, T., Brüning, T., Bolt, H.M., 2007. Dephenylation of the rubber chemical
RI PT
59)
N-phenyl-2-naphthylamine to carcinogenic 2-naphthylamine: a classical problem
598
revisited. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 37, 553–566.
599
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10408440701419637.
)01 )02
Winder, C., Balouet, J.-C., 2002. The toxicity of commercial jet oils. Environ. Res. 89,
M AN U
)00
SC
597
146–164. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/enrs.2002.4346.
Wolff, T., 1992. Metabolism of N-phenyl-2-naphthylamine and
N-phenyl-1-naphthylamine by rat hepatic microsomes and hepatocytes. J. Environ.
)04
Sci. 4, 74–83.
TE D
)03
Xiao, X., Chen, Y.X., Liang, X.Q., Lou, L.P., Tang, X.J., 2010. Effects of Tibetan hulless
)0)
barley on bloom-forming cyanobacterium (Microcystis aeruginosa) measured by
)07
different physiological and morphologic parameters. Chemosphere 81, 1118–1123.
)08
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.09.001.
)10 )11 )12 )13
AC C
)09
EP
)05
Xiao, X., Han, Z.Y., Chen, Y.X., Liang, X.Q., Li, H., Qian, Y.C., 2011. Optimization of FDA-PI method using flow cytometry to measure metabolic activity of the cyanobacteria, Microcystis aeruginosa. Phys. Chem. Earth 36, 424–429. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2010.03.028. Yang, C.Y., Liu, S.J., Zhou, S.W., Wu, H.F., Yu, J.B., Xia, C.H., 2011. Allelochemical
33
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
ethyl 2-methyl acetoacetate (EMA) induces oxidative damage and antioxidant
)15
responses in Phaeodactylum tricornutum. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 100, 93–103.
)1)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pestbp.2011.02.014.
RI PT
)14
Yang, W., Tang, Z., Zhou, F., Zhang, W., Song, L., 2013. Toxicity studies of tetracycline
)18
on Microcystis aeruginosa and Selenastrum capricornutum. Environ. Toxicol.
)19
Pharmacol. 35, 320–324. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.etap.2013.01.006.
)20
Yu, J.Q., Zhou, Y.H., Huang, L.F., Allen, D.J., 2002. Chill-induced inhibition of
SC
)17
photosynthesis: genotypic variation within Cucumis sativus. Plant cell Physiol. 43,
)22
1182–1188. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcf134.
)23
M AN U
)21
Yu, Y., Kong, F., Wang, M., Qian, L., Shi, X., 2007. Determination of short-term copper toxicity in a multispecies microalgal population using flow cytometry. Ecotoxicol.
)25
Environ. Saf. 66, 49–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2005.10.014.
)2)
TE D
)24
Zhu, J., Liu, B., Wang, J., Gao, Y., Wu, Z., 2010. Study on the mechanism of allelopathic influence on cyanobacteria and chlorophytes by submerged macrophyte
)28
(Myriophyllum spicatum) and its secretion. Aquat. Toxicol. 98, 196–203.
AC C
)29
EP
)27
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2010.02.011.
34
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Highlights: ● P1NA and P2NA with similar molecular structure, only P1NA was found high toxic to M. aeruginosa.
RI PT
● ROS induced by P1NA could the reason of the growth inhibition of M. aeruginosa.
● The formation of 1,4-naphthoquinone was the key factor to generate excessive
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
ROS.