Comparative biotoxicity of N-Phenyl-1-naphthylamine and N-Phenyl-2-naphthylamine on cyanobacteria Microcystis aeruginosa

Comparative biotoxicity of N-Phenyl-1-naphthylamine and N-Phenyl-2-naphthylamine on cyanobacteria Microcystis aeruginosa

Accepted Manuscript Comparative biotoxicity of N-Phenyl-1-naphthylamine and N-Phenyl-2-naphthylamine on cyanobacteria Microcystis aeruginosa Long Chen...

9MB Sizes 0 Downloads 40 Views

Accepted Manuscript Comparative biotoxicity of N-Phenyl-1-naphthylamine and N-Phenyl-2-naphthylamine on cyanobacteria Microcystis aeruginosa Long Cheng, Yan He, Yun Tian, Biyun Liu, Yongyuan Zhang, Qiaohong Zhou, Zhenbin Wu PII:

S0045-6535(17)30298-9

DOI:

10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.02.110

Reference:

CHEM 18873

To appear in:

ECSN

Received Date: 10 October 2016 Revised Date:

4 February 2017

Accepted Date: 21 February 2017

Please cite this article as: Cheng, L., He, Y., Tian, Y., Liu, B., Zhang, Y., Zhou, Q., Wu, Z., Comparative biotoxicity of N-Phenyl-1-naphthylamine and N-Phenyl-2-naphthylamine on cyanobacteria Microcystis aeruginosa, Chemosphere (2017), doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.02.110. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Comparative biotoxicity of N-Phenyl-1-naphthylamine and

2

N-Phenyl-2-naphthylamine on cyanobacteria Microcystis aeruginosa

3

Long Cheng a,b, Yan He a,b, Yun Tian a,b, Biyun Liu a,*, Yongyuan Zhang a, Qiaohong

4

Zhou a,*, Zhenbin Wua

5

a



Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430072, China;

7

b

8

*Correspondence: [email protected] (B. Liu)

SC

State Key Laboratory of Freshwater Ecology and Biotechnology, Institute of

University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

M AN U

9

RI PT

1

[email protected] (Q. Zhou)

Abstract: N-Phenyl-1-naphthylamine (P1NA) and N-Phenyl-2-naphthylamine (P2NA)

11

are both widely used as antioxidant and plant secondary metabolites. In this study, growth,

12

esterase, photosynthetic activity and cell membrane integrity were used as biomarkers to

13

compare biotoxicity of P1NA and P2NA on Microcystis aeruginosa. According to the

14

results, a dose-response relationship was observed only between P1NA concentrations and

15

growth inhibition. The EC50 (48 h) of P1NA calculated from growth inhibition was 16.62

1)

µM, while that of P2NA was not detected. When the esterase and photosynthetic activity

17

were applied to evaluate the biotoxicity, it was found that a concentration of 20 µM P1NA,

18

P2NA caused reduction of esterase activity and Fv/Fm of M. aeruginosa to 22.2 and 3.3%,

19

97.5 and 92.1%, respectively, after 48 h exposure. The percentage of membrane-damaged

20

cells was increased as P1NA exposure concentration increased, but that was not detected

AC C

EP

TE D

10

1

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

when exposure to P2NA. The difference substituted position in the molecular structure of

22

P1NA and P2NA leads to different toxicological properties and only P1NA was found

23

highly toxic to M. aeruginosa. The toxicity is due to that only P1NA can be

24

biotransformed to 1,4-naphthoquinone, which could induce overproduction of

25

intracellular ROS as well as result in oxidative damage and growth inhibition of test

2)

organism.

27

Keywords:

28

aeruginosa; Toxic effects; Reactive oxygen species

29

1. Introduction

SC

RI PT

21

N-Phenyl-2-naphthylamine;

Microcystis

M AN U

N-Phenyl-1-naphthylamine;

N-Phenyl-1-naphthylamine (P1NA) serves as an antioxidant in various lubrication

31

oils and also as a protective agent in rubbers as well as rubber mixtures. (Koennecker et

32

al., 1998). It was estimated that the annual production of P1NA was 5800-6300 tons from

33

1986 to 1990 in the world (Koennecker et al., 1998). The distribution of P1NA was

34

predicted approximately 29% to water, 34% to sediment, 36% to soil, and less than 1%

35

each to air, suspended sediment, and biota in the environment using a Level II fugacity

3)

model (Mackay and Models, 2001; Koennecker et al., 1998). N-Phenyl-2-naphthylamine

37

(P2NA), the isomer of P1NA, also used as an additive jet oils and it is a byproduct in the

38

manufacture of P1NA (Winder and Balouet, 2002). It was reported that P1NA was

39

detected in river freshwater (2-7 µg L-1) and sediment (1-5 mg kg-1) near a small specialty

40

chemicals manufacturing ( Koennecker et al., 1998). And P2NA has been detected in

AC C

EP

TE D

30

2

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

41

sediments and freshwater in the proximity of chemical production sites in mg kg-1 and µg

42

L-1 concentrations (Brack et al., 1999; Altenburger et al., 2006). Studies performed according to standard protocols yielded LD50 of P1NA in male

44

and female Wistar rats of >5000 mg kg-1 body weight (Koennecker et al., 1998). Acute

45

oral toxicity test of P2NA indicated that its LD50 in rats and in mice were 8730 mg kg-1

4)

and 1450 mg kg-1 body weight (NTP, 1988). Due to P1NA and P2NA’s lipophilicity with

47

octanol-water partition coefficient, log KOW of 4.2 and 4.38, respectively, they may be

48

expected to have a considerable bio-accumulative potential in aquatic environments and

49

be toxic to aquatic organisms. The studies from laboratory tests with ciliates, Daphnia,

50

and fish indicated that P1NA was highly toxic to aquatic species. EC50 (48 h) for the

51

inhibition of cell proliferation of freshwater ciliates (Tetrahymena pyriformis), LC50 (48 h)

52

with young Daphnia magna and LC50 (96 h) in a flow-through system for rainbow trout

53

(Oncorhynchus mykiss) are, respectively, 2 mg L-1 (Epstein et al., 1967), 0.30 mg L-1, and

54

0.44-0.74 mg L-1 (Sikka et al., 1981). Phytoplankton is the fundamental part in the

55

aquatic ecosystems. However, there is little research about the toxicity of P1NA on

5)

phytoplankton.

SC

M AN U

TE D

EP

AC C

57

RI PT

43

Submerged plants can secrete secondary metabolites to inhibit photosynthetic

58

plankton in order to compete for light and nutrition dominance in the water environment.

59

This phenomenon is called allelopathy and the active substances are known as

)0

allelochemicals (Rice, 1984). In recent years, significant progress in the allelopathic

3

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

effect of submerged macrophyte on cyanobacteria has been made in both laboratory and

)2

field study. In respect of the mechanism of allelopathy, it was reported that aquatic plants

)3

release allelochemicals continually with low concentration, and caused persistent stress

)4

on target organisms. Under this condition, the intracellular signaling radicals (ROS, NO)

)5

were induced, as well as, the programmed cell death (PCD) was trigger in M. aeruginosa

))

which was confirmed by the hallmarks of PCD, caspase-3-like protease activity, DNA

)7

fragmentation, and destruction of cell ultrastructure (He et al., 2016). The engineering

)8

application of allelopathy through reconstructing the aquatic vegetation in the restoration

)9

of the subtropical eutrophic lake was studied. Ma et al. (2009) reported that

70

transformation of water in Yuehu Lake (66 ha), a shallow eutrophic lake in China, from

71

turbid algae green to a transparent state, was achieved by restoring the submerged

72

macrophyte community while the nitrogen and phosphorus are at the level of

73

eutrophication. Thus, it attracted the great interest of researchers to study the mechanism

74

of allelopathy. P1NA and P2NA as a kind of allelochemicals have been isolated and

75

identified in axenic as well as noaxenic root exudates of Eichhornia crassipes

7)

(Sultankhodzhaev and Tadzhibaev, 1976; Sun et al., 1993). These two substances have

77

also been detected in the culture medium of three submerged macrophytes (Elodea

78

nuttallii, Hydrilla verticillata and Vallisneria spiralis) by GC-MS (Gao et al., 2010).

79

Qian et al. (2009, 2010) studied the toxicity of allelochemical P2NA to Chlorella vulgaris

80

and M. aeruginosa. The only difference in molecular structure between P1NA and P2NA

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

)1

4

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

is that anilino-N substitutes at 1 and 2 positions of the naphthyl group. No information is

82

available about whether the toxicity of P1NA and P2NA on cyanobacteria is different and

83

how the toxicity is produced.

RI PT

81

The present study, M. aeruginosa, a dominant species of cyanobacterial blooming,

85

was chosen as a target species. The physiological and photosynthetic parameters i.e.

8)

growth inhibition, esterase activity, cell membrane integrity, and photosynthetic activity

87

were used as biomarkers to compare the toxicity between P1NA and P2NA. Moreover,

88

reactive oxygen specious (ROS) level was used to evaluate the toxicity mechanism. The

89

aim of this study was to (1) provide ecotoxicological information for evaluating the

90

toxicity of P1NA and P2NA to the cyanobacteria (M. aeruginosa) in future ecological risk

91

assessments and regulation of P1NA and P2NA use and discharges in aquatic ecosystems,

92

(2) elucidate toxicity and inhibition mechanism of P1NA and P2NA on cyanobacteria to

93

provide the base for further study the mechanism of allelopathic mechanism.

94

2. Materials and methods

95

2.1 Cultures conditions

M AN U

TE D

EP

AC C

9)

SC

84

Cyanobacteria, Microcystis aeruginosa FACHB 905 was provided by the Institute

97

of Hydrobiology of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. M. aeruginosa was cultured in

98

autoclaved BG11 media (Rippka et al., 1979) at 25 ±0.5

99

intensity of 18 µmol m-2 s-1 with a 12:12 h light: dark cycle. The cultures were shaken

100

three times per day by hands.

5

in an incubator under a light

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

101 102

2.2 Chemicals N-phenyl-1-naphthylamine (98.0%) and N-phenyl-2-naphthylamine (97.0%) were

103

commercially

104

2´,7´-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA), fluorescein diacetate (FDA) and

105

dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO, 99%) were all obtained from Sigma (St. Louis, Missouri,

10)

USA). Propidium Iodide (PI) was purchased from Sangon Co. Ltd (shanghai, China).

107

2.3 Toxicity assays

108

2.3.1 Experimental design

from

the

same

company

(TCI,

Tokyo,

Japan).

M AN U

SC

RI PT

obtained

Conical flasks (250 mL) and culture medium were prepared and autoclaved. 100 mL

110

culture media was added to each bottle. P1NA and P2NA were added with the

111

concentration of 0, 5, 10, 15, 20 µM, respectively. Then M. aeruginosa was inoculated

112

into each flask with the initial density of 1 × 106 cells mL−1 when it was at the

113

exponential growth phase. The samples were taken after 48 and 72 h for the measurement

114

of growth and other physiological parameters. The stock solutions of P1NA and P2NA

115

were prepared with DMSO which in test solution was less than 0.1% (v/v). 0.1% DMSO

11)

had no effects on the growth of M. aeruginosa (FACHB-905) (Gao et al., 2011). The

117

experimental conditions are the same to the cyanobacteria culture conditions shown

118

above. All the experiments were performed in triplicate.

119

2.3.2 Measurement of growth inhibition

120

AC C

EP

TE D

109

The cells density was measured by spectrophotometry at 680 nm. The regression

6

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

equation between cell density (y×103 cells mL-1) and OD680 (x) was calculated as follow:

122

y = 19735x – 33 (R2 = 0.9999). The inhibition ratio (IR) of cyanobacterial growth was

123

calculated according to the following Eq. (1):

124

IR = ( −  )⁄ × 100%

RI PT

121

(1)

where N0 and Ns (cells mL-1) represent cell density in the control and treatment groups,

12)

respectively.

127

2.3.3 Measurement of esterase activity

SC

125

The fluorescein diacetate (FDA) assay has been used to indicate the metabolic

129

activity of cells (Dunker et al., 2013; Xiao et al., 2010, 2011). 5 µL of 1 g L-1 FDA was

130

added into 500 µL cells samples in a final concentration of 10 mg L-1 incubated for 15

131

min at room temperature in darkness. Then cells were analyzed by flow cytometer FACS

132

Verse (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey, USA) with excitation and emission

133

wavelength of 488 nm and 527/32 nm. As depicted by Hadjoudja et al. (2009), the

134

changes of esterase activity exposure to P1NA and P2NA were showed as the decrease in

135

the proportion of cells in the S2 regions (normal activity status) compared with control

13)

cells. Every sample was collected 10000 events.

137

2.3.4 Detection of cell membrane integrity

TE D

EP

AC C

138

M AN U

128

Cell membrane integrity was assessed by fluorescent dye PI which could interact

139

with nucleic acids to produce red fluorescence when the cell membrane was damaged

140

(Xiao et al., 2011). For the measurement of M. aeruginosa cell membrane integrity, 5 µL

7

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

of PI working solution was added to 500 µL of the sample with the final concentration of

142

15 µM and the sample was stained for 15 min in the dark at room temperature.

143

Fluorescence was collected through 586/42 nm with 488 nm laser. Data were expressed

144

as stained cell percentages.

145

2.3.5 Detection of intracellular ROS level

RI PT

141

The ROS level in M. aeruginosa was measured using the cell permeable indicator

147

2´,7´-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA) according to He et al. (2016).

148

The samples of cells were added with a final concentration of 10 µM DCFH-DA and

149

pre-incubation at 25°C in dark for 1 h. Sample fluorescence was measured using flow

150

cytometer with excitation and emission wavelength of 488 nm and 527/32 nm. To prove

151

the role of ROS in the P1NA induced growth inhibition, the BG11 culture mediums were

152

added with ROS scavenger ascorbic acid (0.5, 1 and 2 mM) and then adjusted to pH 7.1

153

with 1 M NaOH. The cells were pre-treated for 1 h and then exposed to 15 µM P1NA for

154

24 h. Growth inhibition in test organism was detected.

155

2.3.6 Photosynthesis activity analysis

M AN U

TE D

EP

AC C

15)

SC

14)

Maximum quantum yield (Fv/Fm), maximal electron transport rate (ETRmax) and

157

light use efficiency ratio (α) were selected to represent the M. aeruginosa photosynthesis

158

status. These values were measured using phyto-PAM analyzer (Walz, Effeltrich,

159

Germany) (Maxwell and Johnson, 2000).

1)0

2.3.7 Determination of P1NA and P2NA concentrations and metabolites

8

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

For analyzing the concentration of P1NA and P2NA, 2 mL culture samples were

1)2

extracted by equivalent ethyl acetate and then the extracts were dehydrated by anhydrous

1)3

sodium sulfate. The extracts being diluted 20 times were then transferred to auto-sampler

1)4

vials for gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) (Agilent 6890N/5973Inert,

1)5

Santa Clara, California, USA). The GC temperature profile consisted of an initial holding

1))

time of 2 min at 40

1)7

reaching a final temperature of 320

1)8

P2NA were 13.5 min and 13.9 min, respectively. The standard curve was prepared and the

1)9

equation for relation between peak area (y) and concentration (x)(µM) (0-1 µM) was as

170

follows: y = 70781x – 2533.9 (R2 = 0.991) and y = 268031x – 5141.2 (R2 = 0.997) for

171

P1NA and P2NA, respectively. The metabolites were qualitatively analyzed in M.

172

aeruginosa exposed to 20 µM of P1NA, P2NA and control group respectively. The

173

metabolites were determined by GC–MS, briefly as follows: 25 mL culture samples

174

(exposure for 72 h) were adjusted to pH 2 with 1 M HCl and extracted three times with

175

an equivalent volume of ethyl acetate. The following sample handling and determination

17)

condition were the same to the Lu et al. (2016).

177

2.4 Statistical analysis

SC

followed by a gradual increase in temperature of 20

min−1,

EP

TE D

M AN U

, held for 24 min. The retention time for P1NA and

AC C

178

RI PT

1)1

Flow cytometric analysis data were analyzed using FlowJo software (Tree Star

179

Software, San Carlos, California, USA). Data are presented in mean ± SD. One-way

180

ANOVA followed by LSD (when homogeneity of variance) or Tamhane's T2 (when

9

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

heterogeneity of variance) post hoc test was used to test for the differences between

182

individual means among P1NA or P2NA treatment at different concentrations.

183

Independent samples t-tests were used to compare the differences individual means when

184

at the same P1NA and P2NA concentration. Differences were considered to be significant

185

at p < 0.05. EC50 values were determined with probit regression. All the statistical

18)

analyses were performed using SPSS 18.0 software (IBM Corporation, Armonk, New

187

York, USA).

188

3 Results and discussion

189

3.1 Real concentrations of P1NA and P2NA concentrations during experiment

M AN U

SC

RI PT

181

In order to determine the real concentrations and stability of P1NA and P2NA, the

191

concentrations in culture medium were quantitatively analyzed at 0, 24, 48 and 72 h. The

192

results are shown in Fig 1. For nominal concentrations of 5, 10, 15, 20 µM, the real

193

exposure concentrations of P1NA were 4.75±0.018, 11.64±1.86, 14.89±0.27, 20.15±0.86

194

µM, respectively. The real exposure concentration of P2NA were 4.17±0.11, 10.62±0.48,

195

12.73±1.46, 19.90±0.17 µM, respectively. It can be found that the actually determining

19)

concentrations are close to the nominal concentrations. The average percentage error of

197

P1NA and P2NA was 5.7% and 9.6% between measured concentrations and nominal

198

values. The concentration of P1NA and P2NA decreased gradually over time in biotic and

199

abiotic conditions. And the decomposition rate of P1NA is faster than that of P2NA. For

200

instance, 20 µM of P1NA and P2NA in the culture medium were reduced by 59.2% and

AC C

EP

TE D

190

10

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

35.8% within 72 h. The half-life of P1NA was 24-50 h, while that of P2NA was 66-120 h

202

which was out of our experimental period calculated from the degradation patterns at 5,

203

10, 15, and 20 µM.

RI PT

201

We speculated that P1NA and P2NA concentrations decreased possibly due to the

205

reason that these substances can be adsorbed and metabolized by cyanobacteria or

20)

photochemically decomposed in the culture medium. Sikka et al. (1981) demonstrated

207

that P1NA was degraded with a half-life ranging from 4 to 11 days in water inoculated

208

with domestic sewage and lake water, respectively. A further experiment conducted in

209

aqueous solution, indicated that P1NA could be directly photochemically degraded (Sikka

210

et al. 1981). Meanwhile, on the basis of in vitro studies, metabolism of P1NA and P2NA

211

likely occurs primarily via hydroxylation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, 2015;

212

Koennecker et al., 1998; Weiss et al., 2007). 5 µM

10

15 µM

EP

15

10 µM

P1NA

AC C

Surplus (µ M)

20

TE D

M AN U

SC

204

20 µM

P2NA 15

10

5

5

0

0

20 µM in abiotic conditions

20

0 1

2

3

0

1

2

3

Time(day)

213 214

Fig 1. Real concentrations of P1NA and P2NA (µM) in the culture medium, during the experimental period.

215

Data are presented in mean ± SD.

11

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

21)

3.2 Effects of P1NA and P2NA on M. aeruginosa growth Cell growth inhibition is commonly used as a valid biomarker to evaluate the

218

phytotoxicity on cyanobacteria as it shows. Because it is an integrating parameter

219

showing toxicants inhibitory effects on all cellular metabolism (Dewez et al., 2008). The

220

inhibition effects of P1NA and P2NA on M. aeruginosa growth were studied after 48 and

221

72 h (Fig 2). It can be seen that when exposure to P1NA, the growth inhibition of M.

222

aeruginosa increased with an increasing concentration of P1NA. After 48 h, the inhibition

223

rates in the group of 5, 10, 15, 20 µM of P1NA were 4.0%, 6.9%, 40.6%, 69.4%,

224

respectively. However, those of P2NA were 0.3%, 3.1%, 0.6%, 0.3%, respectively. The

225

inhibition rates were 5.0%, 14.1%, 46.1%, 74.1%, respectively, exposure by P1NA after

22)

72 h. A significant dose-response and time-dependent relationship were displayed in

227

P1NA group, while these relationships for P2NA were not observed in the experiment.

228

Growth inhibition rates of P1NA exposed to 10, 15, 20 µM were higher than that of P2NA

229

at 48h, and the differences were 3.8%, 40.0%, 69.0%, respectively. It showed significant

230

differences (p< 0.05) with the exposure time for 48 h in the group of 10, 15 and 20 µM,

231

and with the exposure time for 72 h in the group of 15 and 20 µM, respectively.

SC

M AN U

TE D

EP

AC C

232

RI PT

217

The EC50 (48 h) value (Table S1) of P1NA calculated from growth inhibition was

233

16.616 µM (3.64 mg/L), while that of P2NA was not detected. The results showed that

234

only P1NA was highly toxic to M. aeruginosa. Koennecker et al., (1998) reported that

235

P1NA was low toxic to the animal but highly toxic to aquatic organisms. An EC50 (48h) of

12

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

2 mg L-1 of P1NA was measured for the inhibition of cell proliferation of freshwater

237

ciliates Tetrahymena pyriformis (Epstein et al., 1967). LC50 (48h) for young and adult

238

Daphnia magna were in the range of 0.30-0.68 mg L-1 (Koennecker et al., 1998). The

239

toxicity of P1NA to M. aeruginosa was similar to that of protozoa, which was lower than

240

that of cladoceran zooplankton. However, several studies have reported that P2NA is a

241

highly toxic substance to C. vulgaris (Qian et al., 2009), M. aeruginosa (Qian et al., 2010)

242

and Cylindrospermopsis raciborskii (Liu et al., 2015). The toxicity of P2NA may be

243

affected by the strain of the test organism or the culture conditions. The difference needs

244

to be furtherly studied in the future.

48h

***

**

60

C

C

40

0

5

10

EP

A a

A a

AC C

0

*

B a

a

15

a

*** D

80

D

60

P2NA

72h

***

80

20

245

P1NA

100

TE D

Growth Inhibition (%)

100

M AN U

SC

RI PT

23)

40

20

0

20

B c A a

b

A

0

5

10

c

15

c

20

P1NA/P2NA Concentration(µM)

24)

Fig 2. Effect of P1NA and P2NA on growth inhibition in M. aeruginosa. * (P<0.05), ** (P<0.01), and ***

247

(P<0.001) indicate significant differences between P1NA and P2NA. Different small letters in each figure in

248

the same type of growth inhibition represent statistically significant differences (p<0.05) compared to the

249

corresponding controls. Data are presented in mean ± SD.

250

3.3 Impact on esterase activity

13

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

The esterase activity in M. aeruginosa exposed to P1NA and P2NA for 48 and 72 h

252

were shown in Fig 3. It could be found that the esterase activity significantly decreased in

253

the group of 5 µM and 10 µM exposure to P1NA at 48 h. And then the esterase activity

254

drastically reduced with the increase of P1NA concentration, it declined to 70.2% and

255

22.2% of the proportion of cells in the S2 regions (normal activity status) (Hadjoudja et al.

25)

2009) with 15 µM and 20 µM of concentrations exposure to P1NA. The similar pattern

257

could be found in the group exposure for 72 h, while it did not further lower the esterase

258

activity. As opposed to P1NA, the esterase activity was invariant as P2NA concentrations

259

increased at 48 and 72 h.

M AN U

SC

RI PT

251

80

80

48 h

60

40

0

2)1 2)2

5

AC C

0

EP

20

2)0

P2NA

100

TE D

% S2 FDA Fluorescence

100

P1NA

10

72 h

60

40

20

0 15

20

0

5

10

15

20

P1NA/P2NA Concentration (µM)

Fig 3. Effect of P1NA and P2NA on esterase activity in M. aeruginosa. Data are presented in mean ± SD.

Esterase activity was commonly used to evaluate the metabolic status of the cell

2)3

because it was a rapid and sensitive endpoint (Valiente Moro et al., 2012), and usually, a

2)4

decline in enzyme activity indicated the presence of stress (Hadjoudja et al., 2009; Regel

2)5

et al., 2002). Herbicide paraquat and copper could result in reducing esterase activity due

14

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

to oxidative stress and showed a dose-response relationship in acute toxicity test for

2)7

phytoplankton (Hadjoudja et al., 2009; Prado et al., 2012). It indicated that the decline in

2)8

esterase activity exposure to P1NA being similar to paraquat and copper. And it gave an

2)9

information not only to be helpful to promptly determine the physiological state of cells

270

but also to evaluate the toxicity of pollutants. The change of esterase activity along with

271

growth inhibition suggested that the toxicity of P1NA and P2NA to M. aeruginosa had an

272

obvious difference.

273

3.4 Inhibition of photosynthetic activity

M AN U

SC

RI PT

2))

In the present study, maximum quantum yield (Fv/Fm), maximal electron transport

275

rate (ETRmax) and light use efficiency ratio (α) were used to estimate the efficiency of

27)

PSII in M. aeruginosa. PSII efficiency in M. aeruginosa exposure to P1NA and P2NA are

277

shown in Fig 4. The results showed that Fv/Fm has significantly decreased in the group

278

of 15 and 20 µM P1NA exposure for 48 and 72 h (p < 0.05) (Fig 3A, 3B). It was different

279

when exposure to P2NA. At 48 h, Fv/Fm was significantly decreased in the group of 10,

280

15 and 20 µM P2NA (p<0.05). But every concentration of the P2NA treatment group did

281

not have any differences at 72 h (p> 0.05) which was consistent with the trend of growth

282

inhibition. There was a significant difference between P1NA and P2NA in the group of 15

283

and 20 µM at 48 and 72 h. The effects on ETRmax and α are shown in Fig 4C, 4D and

284

Fig 4E, 4F, respectively. P1NA treatment led to a significant decrease in ETRmax or α

285

values at high concentration, while exposure of P2NA slightly reduced them. It was much

AC C

EP

TE D

274

15

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

28)

similar to the change of Fv/Fm values. The P1NA caused a severe toxicity on PSII of the cyanobacteria M. aeruginosa, as

288

introduced above. These results were consistent with the growth and esterase activity of

289

M. aeruginosa. It is known that the value of Fv/Fm characterizes the content of

290

photochemically active centers of PSII and indicates the current balance between

291

processes of light destruction and the reparation of PSII (Brack and Frank, 1998).

292

Similarly, some kinds of exogenous substances such as tetracycline and natural

293

flavonoids were found to inhibit growth and reduce Fv/Fm values in M. aeruginosa and

294

Selenastrum capricornutum (Huang et al., 2015; Yang et al., 2013). Allelochemicals

295

identified from Myriophyllum spicatum, including pyrogallic acid, gallic acid, ellagic acid

29)

and (+)-catechin caused significant reductions of PSII efficiency and whole electron

297

transport chain activities in M. aeruginosa (Zhu et al., 2010). The decrease of the

298

ETRmax suggested that stress resulting from exposure to P1NA and P2NA had inhibitory

299

effects on the donor side of PSII in M. aeruginosa. Blockage of electron transfer chain

300

accompanied by a decrease in Fv/Fm (Han et al., 2008; Liu et al., 2015). In M.

301

aeruginosa, the initial effect concentrations showing a significant difference between

302

P1NA and P2NA for ETRmax (5 µM) was lower than that for Fv/Fm (10 µM) for 48 h.

303

The disparity between the responses of Fv/Fm and ETRmax reflects inhibition

304

downstream of PS II, suggesting that the down-regulation of PS II electron transport is a

305

result of inhibition of Calvin cycle enzymes and Rubisco (Han et al., 2008; Yu et al.,

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

287

16

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

2002). But in general, though P2NA can slightly weaken the photosynthesis of M.

307

aeruginosa, it is no doubt that the toxicity is different between P1NA and P2NA in M.

308

aeruginosa.

Fv/Fm--maximal quantum yield (A) 48h



0.6 0.5

A a

A a

A

∗∗∗

∗∗

b

0.5

B

0.4

0.2

0.2

0.1 5

10

15

(B)

B a

∗∗∗

∗∗

a

a

C

0.1

C 0

A a

M AN U

0.3

0.0

AB a

0.4

0.3

P2NA

72h

0.6

bc

c

P1NA

0.7

SC

0.7

RI PT

30)

0.0

20

0

5

D 10

15

20

2

140 120 100

ETRmax--maximal electron transport ratio(m s) 140

A a

∗∗ 48h

∗ A

A b

b

60 40

B

b

∗∗∗

5

10

∗∗

AB

b



72h

A a

A b



A c

AC C

0.25 0.20

15

b

b

48h (E)

∗∗

∗∗∗ bc

c

20 0

D 0

5

10

309 310

5

15 P1NA

P2NA

72h (F) 0.25

A a

A b

A b



B

0.20

20

∗∗∗ b

b

0.15 0.10

0.05

0

c

C b

40

0.30

0.10

0.00

∗∗∗

60

20

B

0.15

(D)

B

α--light use efficiency ratio 0.30

P2NA

80

EP

0

A a

100

C

20 0



120

TE D

80

(C)

P1NA

0.05

C

C 10

15

20

0.00

0

5

10

15

20

P1NA/P2NA Concentration (µM) Fig 4. Effects of P1NA and P2NA on Fv/Fm (A, B), ETRmax (C, D) and α (E, F) in M. aeruginosa. (F). *

17

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

(P<0.05), ** (P<0.01), and *** (P<0.001) indicate significant differences at the same concentration of

312

P1NA and P2NA. Different small letters in each figure in the same type of Fv/Fm, ETRmax or α represent

313

statistically significant differences (p<0.05) compared to the corresponding controls without P1NA or

314

P2NA.

315

3.5 Effect on cell membrane integrity

RI PT

311

The percentage of PI-stained cells of M. aeruginosa exposure to P1NA and P2NA

317

are presented in Fig 5. After 48 h, percentage of cells stained by PI exposed to 5, 10, 15,

318

20 µM, of P1NA were 7.0%, 7.6%, 21.3%, 61.4%, respectively. However, that of P2NA

319

were 3.2%, 3.2%, 3.4%, 3.3%, respectively. It showed that as P1NA concentration

320

increased, the PI positive cell percentage was increased in a dose-response relationship

321

and it had a significant difference in every P1NA concentration being tested compared to

322

the control (p < 0.05). However, there was no change in the integrity of the cell

323

membrane in M. aeruginosa when exposure to P2NA (P > 0.05). And it all showed a

324

significant difference in same exposure concentration between P1NA and P2NA (p <

325

0.05).

M AN U

TE D

EP

AC C

32)

SC

31)

Cells stained by PI is a recognized method being used to probe cell membrane

327

integrity for the assessment of the environmental impact of toxic contaminants in aquatic

328

systems. Herbicide paraquat and allelochemical tannic acid have been reported to lead

329

damages to the membrane integrity of phytoplankton cells indicating a reduction in the

330

percentage of viable cells exposed to that agent (Eigemann et al., 2013; Prado et al.,

18

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

2009). Studies reported that aquatic plants such as E. crassipes (Sultankhodzhaev and

332

Tadzhibaev, 1976; Sun et al., 1993), Elodea nuttallii, Hydrilla verticillata and Vallisneria

333

spiralis (Gao et al., 2010) could secrete P1NA and P2NA, which showed high allelopathic

334

activity. Xiao et al. (2010) indicated that assay of cell membrane integrity was a novel

335

and fast method to determine whether the antialgal agents were algicidal (killing algae) or

33)

algistatic (preventing algal growth). This paper suggested that P1NA has the nature of

337

killing cyanobacteria together with growth assays and cell membrane integrity tests. The

338

studies indicated that P1NA is the allelochemical which shows higher inhibitory activities

339

to cyanobacteria than that of P2NA.

M AN U

SC

RI PT

331

P1NA

80

∗∗∗

48h

D

40

TE D

60

∗∗∗

∗∗∗

20

A a a 0

B a 5

AC C

0

∗∗∗

B

10

a

∗∗∗

40

C

C

EP

PI Positive (%)

60

∗∗∗

72h

D

340

P2NA

80

a

a

15

20

∗ A a

B a

0

5

∗∗∗ B

a

a

a

0 20

10

15

20

P1NA/P2NA Concentration (µM)

341

Fig 5. Effect of P1NA and P2NA on cell membrane integrity in M. aeruginosa. * (P<0.05), ** (P<0.01), and

342

*** (P<0.001) indicate significant differences between P1NA and P2NA. Different small letters in each

343

figure in the same type of growth inhibition represent statistically significant differences (p<0.05)

344

compared to the corresponding controls. Data are presented in mean ± SD.

345

A comparison of the sensitivity tested by different endpoints including growth

19

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

inhibition, esterase activity, cell membrane integrity and the efficiency of photosynthesis

347

was performed. And the EC50 values of P1NA were given in Table S1. The EC50 values

348

based on growth inhibition, esterase activity, cell membrane integrity and Fv/Fm were

349

16.616, 17.445, 16.099, 19.604 µM, respectively, which were not far from each other.

350

These results suggested that the parameters being tested were effective endpoints in acute

351

toxicity test. However, EC50 values of P2NA was not detected in same conditions in this

352

study. All results shown above indicated that the acute toxicity test of P1NA and P2NA in

353

M. aeruginosa exhibited significant difference.

354

3.6 Toxic mechanism of P1NA

M AN U

SC

RI PT

34)

Oxidative damage induced by ROS has been proved to be the reason resulting in

35)

the toxic effect of chemical toxicants such as anthraquinone derivative (Schrader et al.,

357

2005) and pyrogallic acid (Lu et al., 2016) to phytoplankton. To reveal the possible

358

mechanism of the different toxicity between P1NA and P2NA, the intracellular ROS level

359

was measured. From Fig 6, the remarkable increase in intracellular ROS levels with the

3)0

increase of P1NA concentration was observed after 48h exposure (p < 0.05). The ROS

3)1

level in the group of 5, 10, 15, 20 µM P1NA were 1.31, 1.75, 2.46, 2.83 times higher than

3)2

that of control, respectively. However, a significant dose-response relationship was not

3)3

found in the group exposure to P2NA, in which slight lower level than the control was

3)4

observed.

AC C

EP

TE D

355

20

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

P1NA

3.0

P2NA

RI PT

2.0

1.5

1.0

0.5

0.0 0

5

10

SC

ROS relative intisity

2.5

15

20

M AN U

P1NA/P2NA Concentration (µM)

3)5 3))

Fig 6. Intracellular ROS level in M. aeruginosa exposure to P1NA and P2NA for 48 h. Relative ROS level

3)7

was reflected by the mean fluorescence intensity of DCF. Data are presented in mean ± SD.

ROS including O2·-, H2O2 and ·OH are produced by the normal metabolic process

3)9

and maintain a dynamic balance with the antioxidant system in organisms. The

370

overproduction of ROS in phytoplankton was in response to toxicants with redox-cycling

371

property and adverse environmental stresses (Wang et al., 2012; Yang et al., 2011). It was

372

reported that the acute increase of ROS induced by gramine could be a potential cause of

373

the growth inhibition of cyanobacteria (Hong et al., 2009). In addition, it has been also

374

demonstrated that the overproduction of ROS affected cell growth or proliferation. For

375

example, Wang et al. (2011) reported that allelochemicals (+)-catechin and pyrogallic

37)

acid can induce the generation of intracellular ROS to inhibit the growth of two

377

freshwater algae.

AC C

EP

TE D

3)8

21

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

As is known that high level of ROS can directly damage proteins, nucleic acids, and

379

cell membrane (Yu et al., 2007), finally leading to growth inhibition and cell death. In

380

order to evaluate the effects of ROS level on the growth inhibition, the decrease of

381

esterase activity, Fv/Fm, and cell membrane integrity, the relevance between ROS and

382

these four parameters was analyzed. The regression curve and correlation coefficients (R2)

383

were given in Table S2. The R2 between ROS and these four parameters mentioned above

384

were 0.892, 0.781, 0.694, 0.694, respectively. It suggested that increased ROS level was

385

the major mechanism contributing to the growth inhibition of M. aeruginosa exposure to

38)

P1NA under the experimental conditions. In addition, the regression analysis was done for

387

the relationships between the growth inhibition effect and ROS, esterase activity, Fv/Fm

388

and cell membrane integrity.

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

378

To furtherly verify the role of ROS in the growth inhibition of M. aeruginosa

390

exposed to P1NA, the protective effect of ascorbic acid, a kind of free radical scavenger,

391

was investigated. As illustrated in Fig S1, growth inhibition induced by 15 µM P1NA in

392

M. aeruginosa was significantly alleviated after the treatments of ascorbic acid. Ascorbic

393

acid was the widely and water-soluble antioxidant for the prevention or minimization of

394

damages caused by ROS in plants (Khan and Ashraf, 2008). Lu et al. (2016)

395

demonstrated that ascorbic acid could decrease the DNA strand breaks of M. aeruginosa

39)

exposed to pyrogallic acid. The result of ROS scavenger experiments demonstrated that

397

the excessive formation of ROS induced by P1NA was the main cause leading to growth

AC C

EP

389

22

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

398

inhibition in M. aeruginosa. In vitro studies have demonstrated that P1NA was primarily metabolized via

400

hydroxylation (Koennecker et al., 1998) to form Mono- and dihydroxy-metabolites

401

(Sikka et al., 1981; Wolff, 1992). However, only the monohydroxy-metabolites

402

6-hydroxy-N-phenyl-2-naphthylamine and 4′- hydroxy-N-phenyl-2-naphthylamine were

403

detected after exposure with P2NA (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, 2015; Weiss et al.,

404

2007). Dihydroxy-metabolites can form quinone while monohydroxy-metabolites not. As

405

summarized previously (O’brien, 1991), oxidative stress arises when the quinone is

40)

reduced by reductases to a semiquinone radical which reduces oxygen to superoxide

407

radicals and reforms the quinone. Wang et al. (2011) reported that polyphenolic

408

allelochemicals such as (+)-catechin and pyrogallic acid could elevate cellular ROS level

409

through futile redox cycles, which amplify the generation of O2.- with the expense of

410

NAD(P)H and greatly enhance the toxicity to the target organisms. The results suggested

411

that the generation of ROS was related to the biotransformation metabolites of P1NA.

412

Therefore, the metabolites of P1NA and P2NA in M. aeruginosa were detected by GC/MS.

413

1,4-naphthoquinone was found in M. aeruginosa exposure to P1NA, while it was not

414

detected in P2NA and control groups (Fig S2). We speculated P1NA metabolized to form

415

1,4-dihydroxynaphthalene firstly. It was similar to (+)-catechin and pyrogallic acid which

41)

may cause autoxidation or enzymatic oxidation to easily form semiquinone radical in the

417

target organism. The reactive semiquinone radical is able to react with O2 to produce

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

399

23

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

o-quinone form of 1,4-dihydroxynaphthalene accompanying the production of O2.-.

419

Dismutation of O2.- produces H2O2, and then H2O2 can be reduced via the Fenton-type

420

reaction in the presence of transition metals to form the ·OH. Therefore, it is reasonable

421

to expect that the metabolites of P1NA may undergo futile redox cycling in the presence

422

of intracellular reductants such as NAD(P)H (O’brien, 1991) and induce ROS production

423

in M. aeruginosa. A possible pathway of ROS generation in M. aeruginosa induced by

424

P1NA could be proposed as shown in Fig 7. In brief, it was the first time to demonstrate

425

that P1NA exhibited remarkably stronger growth inhibition effects in M. aeruginosa than

42)

its isomer P2NA. The different property in inducing excessive ROS between P1NA and

427

P2NA was the important reason to exhibit different toxicity in M. aeruginosa. The

428

formation of 1,4-naphthoquinone was the key factor to generate excessive ROS.

429

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

418

430

Fig 7. A possible pathway of ROS production induced by P1NA in M. aeruginosa.

431

4 Conclusion

432

The results of comparing the toxicity of P1NA and P2NA indicated that only P1NA

433

was highly toxic to M. aeruginosa. The 48 h EC50 values based on growth inhibition were

24

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

16.616 µM, while that of P2NA was not detected in same conditions. The intracellular

435

ROS levels were significantly increased in M. aeruginosa exposure to P1NA, while it was

43)

not found in the group of P2NA. Attention should be paid to the influence of P1NA on

437

other aquatic organisms and aquatic ecosystem. In the research field of allelopathy, the

438

toxic effect of P1NA on phytoplankton should be investigated as the main object

439

compared with P2NA.

440

Acknowledgements

SC

RI PT

434

The study was financially supported by the National Nature Science Foundation of

442

China (grant number 51178452, 50909091 and 31123001), the Major Science and

443

Technology Program for Water Pollution Control and Treatment of China 12th Five-Year

444

Plan (grant number 2012ZX07101007-005), and the State Key Laboratory of Freshwater

445

Ecology and Biotechnology Program (grant number 2013FB20). The authors thank

44)

Liping Zhang and Yan Wang at Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences

447

for assistance in using GC-MS and flow cytometer.

448

REFERENCES

449

Altenburger, R., Brack, W., Greco, W.R., Grote, M., Jung, K., Ovari, A., Riedl, J.,

451 452 453

TE D

EP

AC C

450

M AN U

441

Schwab, K., Küster, E., 2006. On the Mode of Action of N -Phenyl-2-naphthylamine in Plants. Environ. Sci. Technol. 40, 6163–6169. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es060338e.

Brack, W., Altenburger, R., Ensenbach, U., Möder, M., Segner, H., Schüürmann, G.,

25

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

1999. Bioassay-directed identification of organic toxicants in river sediment in the

455

industrial region of Bitterfeld (Germany)-a contribution to hazard assessment. Arch.

45)

Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 37, 164–174. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/S002449900502.

457

RI PT

454

Brack, W., Frank, H., 1998. Chlorophyll a Fluorescence: A Tool for the Investigation of Toxic Effects in the Photosynthetic Apparatus. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 40, 34–41.

459

http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/eesa.1997.1639.

4)0

SC

458

Dewez, D., Didur, O., Vincent-Héroux, J., Popovic, R., 2008. Validation of photosynthetic-fluorescence parameters as biomarkers for isoproturon toxic effect

4)2

on alga Scenedesmus obliquus. Environ. Pollut. 151, 93–100.

4)3

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2007.03.002.

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, 2015. N-Phenyl-2-naphthylamine (MAK Value

TE D

4)4

M AN U

4)1

4)5

Documentation, 2011

4))

Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/3527600418.mb13588e5014.

4)9 470 471

EP

4)8

Dunker, S., Jakob, T., Wilhelm, C., 2013. Contrasting effects of the cyanobacterium Microcystis aeruginosa on the growth and physiology of two green algae, Oocystis

AC C

4)7

. The MAK Collection for Occupational Health and Safety;

marsonii and Scenedesmus obliquus, revealed by flow cytometry. Freshw. Biol. 58, 1573–1587. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/fwb.12143.

Eigemann, F., Hilt, S., Schmitt-Jansen, M., 2013. Flow cytometry as a diagnostic tool for

472

the effects of polyphenolic allelochemicals on phytoplankton. Aquat. Bot. 104, 5–14.

473

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquabot.2012.10.005.

26

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

474

Epstein, S.S., Saporoschetz, I.B., Hutner, S.H., 1967. Toxicity of antioxidants to Tetrahymena pyriformis. J. Protozool. 14, 238–244.

47)

http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1550-7408.1967.tb01991.x.

RI PT

475

Görner, H., Miskolczy, Z., Megyesi, M., Biczók, L., 2011. Photooxidation of Alkaloids:

478

Considerable Quantum Yield Enhancement by Rose Bengal-sensitized Singlet

479

Molecular Oxygen Generation. Photochem. Photobiol. 87, 1315–1320.

480

http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-1097.2011.00994.x.

M AN U

481

SC

477

Gao YN. 2010. Studies on the allelopathy of exudates from three submerged

482

hydrocharitaceae specieson to Microcystis aeruginosa. Ph.D. thesis, Institute of

483

Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, China. Gao, Y.N., Liu, B.Y., Xu, D., Zhou, Q.H., Hu, C.Y., Ge, F.J., Zhang, L.P., Wu, Z. Bin,

TE D

484

2011. Phenolic compounds exuded from two submerged freshwater macrophytes

48)

and their allelopathic effects on microcystis aeruginosa. Polish J. Environ. Stud. 20,

487

1153 1159.

489 490 491

Gross, E.M., Meyer, H., Schilling, G., 1996. Release and ecological impact of algicidal

AC C

488

EP

485

hydrolysable polyphenols in Myriophyllum spicatum. Phytochemistry 41, 133–138. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0031-9422(95)00598-6.

Hadjoudja, S., Vignoles, C., Deluchat, V., Lenain, J.F., Le Jeune, A.H., Baudu, M., 2009.

492

Short term copper toxicity on Microcystis aeruginosa and Chlorella vulgaris using

493

flow cytometry. Aquat. Toxicol. 94, 255–264.

27

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

494 495

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2009.07.007. Han, T., Kang, S.H., Park, J.S., Lee, H.K., Brown, M.T., 2008. Physiological responses of Ulva pertusa and U. armoricana to copper exposure. Aquat. Toxicol. 86, 176–

497

184. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2007.10.016.

498

RI PT

49)

He, Y., Zhou, Q.H., Liu, B.Y., Cheng, L., Tian, Y., Zhang, Y.Y., Wu, Z.B., 2016.

Programmed cell death in the cyanobacterium Microcystis aeruginosa induced by

500

allelopathic effect of submerged macrophyte Myriophyllum spicatum in co-culture

501

system. J. Appl. Phycol. 1–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10811-016-0814-7.

M AN U

502

SC

499

Hong, Y., Hu, H.Y., Li, F.M., 2008. Physiological and biochemical effects of allelochemical ethyl 2-methyl acetoacetate (EMA) on cyanobacterium Microcystis

504

aeruginosa. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 71, 527–534.

505

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2007.10.010

50)

TE D

503

Hong, Y., Hu, H.Y., Xie, X., Sakoda, A., Sagehashi, M., Li, F.M., 2009. Gramine-induced growth inhibition, oxidative damage and antioxidant responses in

508

freshwater cyanobacterium Microcystis aeruginosa. Aquat. Toxicol. 91, 262–269.

AC C

509

EP

507

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2008.11.014.

510

Huang, H., Xiao, X., Ghadouani, A., Wu, J., Nie, Z., Peng, C., Xu, X., Shi, J., 2015.

511

Effects of natural flavonoids on photosynthetic activity and cell integrity in

512

Microcystis aeruginosa. Toxins (Basel). 7, 66–80.

513

http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxins7010066

28

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

514

Khan, A., Ashraf, M., 2008. Exogenously applied ascorbic acid alleviates salt-induced oxidative stress in wheat. Environ. Exp. Bot. 63, 224–231.

51)

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2007.10.018.

518 519

Koennecker, G., Mangelsdorf, I., Wibbertmann, A., 1998. N-phenyl-1-naphthylamine. Ipcs Concise Int. Chem. Assess. Doc. 12, 1–25.

Liu, R., Ran, X., Bai, F., Xu, J., Yang, S., Shi, J., Wu, Z., 2015. Use of chlorophyll a

SC

517

RI PT

515

fluorescence to elucidate the toxicity target of N-phenyl-2-naphthylamine on

521

photosynthetic system of Cylindrospermopsis raciborskii (Cyanobacteria).

522

Phycologia 54, 12–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.2216/14-050.1

523

M AN U

520

Lu, Z., Zhang, Y., Gao, Y., Liu, B., Sun, X., He, F., Zhou, Q., Wu, Z., 2016. Effects of pyrogallic acid on Microcystis aeruginosa: oxidative stress related toxicity.

525

Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 132, 413–419.

52)

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2016.06.039

529 530

EP

528

Ma, J.M., Cheng, S.P., He, F., Zuo, J.C., Zhao, Q., Zhang, Z., Wu, J., Wu, Z.B, 2009. Practice and implication of establishing aquatic vegetation in Lake Yuehu in Wuhan,

AC C

527

TE D

524

China. Acta Hydrobiol. Sin. 33, 222–229. http://dx.doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.0000.2009.20222

531

Mackay, D., Models, M.E., 2001. The Fugacity Approach. Lewis Publ.

532

Maxwell, K., Johnson, G.N., 2000. Chlorophyll fluorescence-a practical guide. J. Exp.

533

Bot. 51, 659–668. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jexbot/51.345.659.

29

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

534

Nakai, S., Inoue, Y., Hosomi, M., 2001. Algal growth inhibition effects and inducement modes by plant-producing phenols. Water Res. 35, 1855–1859.

53)

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00444-9.

537

Nakai, S., Yamada, S., Hosomi, M., 2005. Anti-cyanobacterial fatty acids released from Myriophyllum spicatum. Hydrobiologia 543, 71–78.

539

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10750-004-6822-7.

SC

538

540

RI PT

535

US NTP, 1988. Toxicology and Carcinogenesis Studies of N-Phenyl-2-naphthylamine in F344/N Rats and B6C3F1 Mice (feed studies). US National Toxicology Program,

542

http://ntp-server.niehs.nih.gov/htdocs/lt-studies/tr333.html.

544

O’brien, P.J., 1991. Molecular mechanisms of quinone cytotoxicity. Chem. Biol. Interact. 80, 1–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0009-2797(91)90029-7.

TE D

543

M AN U

541

Prado, R., García, R., Rioboo, C., Herrero, C., Abalde, J., Cid, A., 2009. Comparison of

54)

the sensitivity of different toxicity test endpoints in a microalga exposed to the

547

herbicide paraquat. Environ. Int. 35, 240–247.

548

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2008.06.012.

550 551 552 553

AC C

549

EP

545

Prado, R., Rioboo, C., Herrero, C., Suárez-Bregua, P., Cid, Á., 2012. Flow cytometric analysis to evaluate physiological alterations in herbicide-exposed Chlamydomonas moewusii cells. Ecotoxicology 21, 409–420. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10646-011-0801-3. Qian, H., Xu, X., Chen, W., Jiang, H., Jin, Y., Liu, W., Fu, Z., 2009. Allelochemical

30

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

stress causes oxidative damage and inhibition of photosynthesis in Chlorella

555

vulgaris. Chemosphere 75, 368–375.

55)

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.12.040

557

RI PT

554

Qian, H., Yu, S., Sun, Z., Xie, X., Liu, W., Fu, Z., 2010. Effects of copper sulfate,

hydrogen peroxide and N-phenyl-2-naphthylamine on oxidative stress and the

559

expression of genes involved photosynthesis and microcystin disposition in

5)0

Microcystis aeruginosa. Aquat. Toxicol. 99, 405–412.

5)1

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2010.05.018.

M AN U

5)2

SC

558

Regel, R.H., Ferris, J.M., Ganf, G.G., Brookes, J.D., 2002. Algal esterase activity as a biomeasure of environmental degradation in a freshwater creek. Aquat. Toxicol. 59,

5)4

209–223. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0166-445X(01)00254-5.

TE D

5)3

5)5

Rice, E.L., 1984. Allelopathy, 2nd edn. Academic, Orlando, pp 1–2.

5))

Rippka, R., Deruelles, J., Waterbury, J.B., Herdman, M., Stanier, R.Y., 1979. Generic assignments, strain histories and properties of pure cultures of cyanobacteria. J. Gen.

5)8

Microbiol. 111, 1–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/00221287-111-1-1

EP

5)7

Schrader, K.K., Dayan, F.E., Nanayakkara, N.P.D., 2005. Generation of reactive oxygen

570

species by a novel anthraquinone derivative in the cyanobacterium Planktothrix

571 572 573

AC C

5)9

perornata (Skuja). Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 81, 198–207. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pestbp.2004.11.004.

Shao, J., Xu, Y., Wang, Z., Jiang, Y., Yu, G., Peng, X., Li, R., 2011. Elucidating the

31

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

toxicity targets of β-ionone on photosynthetic system of Microcystis aeruginosa

575

NIES-843 (Cyanobacteria). Aquat. Toxicol. 104, 48–55.

57)

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2011.03.014.

577

RI PT

574

Sikka.H.C, Pack.E.J, Sugatt.R.H, Banerjee.S, Rosenberg.A, 1981. Environmental fate

and effects of N-phenyl-1-naphthylamine and its disposition and metabolism in the

579

rat. Syracuse Res. Co. 106.

580

SC

578

Sultankhodzhaev, M.N., Tadzhibaev, M.M., 1976. N-phenyl-β-naphthylamine from three species of plants. Chem. Nat. Compd. 12, 361.

582

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00567836.

584

Sun, W., Yu, S., Yang, S., Wu, H., 1993. Allelochemicals from root exudates of water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes). Acta Phytophysiol. Sin.

TE D

583

M AN U

581

Valiente Moro, C., Bricheux, G., Portelli, C., Bohatier, J., 2012. Comparative effects of

58)

the herbicides chlortoluron and mesotrione on freshwater microalgae. Environ.

587

Toxicol. Chem. 31, 778–786. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/etc.1749.

589 590 591

Wang, G., Deng, S., Li, C., Liu, Y., Chen, L., Hu, C., 2012. Damage to DNA caused by

AC C

588

EP

585

UV-B radiation in the desert cyanobacterium Scytonema javanicum and the effects of exogenous chemicals on the process. Chemosphere 88, 413–417. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.02.056.

592

Wang, J., Zhu, J., Liu, S., Liu, B., Gao, Y., Wu, Z., 2011. Generation of reactive oxygen

593

species in cyanobacteria and green algae induced by allelochemicals of submerged

32

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

594

macrophytes. Chemosphere 85, 977–982.

595

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.06.076. Weiss, T., Brüning, T., Bolt, H.M., 2007. Dephenylation of the rubber chemical

RI PT

59)

N-phenyl-2-naphthylamine to carcinogenic 2-naphthylamine: a classical problem

598

revisited. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 37, 553–566.

599

http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10408440701419637.

)01 )02

Winder, C., Balouet, J.-C., 2002. The toxicity of commercial jet oils. Environ. Res. 89,

M AN U

)00

SC

597

146–164. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/enrs.2002.4346.

Wolff, T., 1992. Metabolism of N-phenyl-2-naphthylamine and

N-phenyl-1-naphthylamine by rat hepatic microsomes and hepatocytes. J. Environ.

)04

Sci. 4, 74–83.

TE D

)03

Xiao, X., Chen, Y.X., Liang, X.Q., Lou, L.P., Tang, X.J., 2010. Effects of Tibetan hulless

)0)

barley on bloom-forming cyanobacterium (Microcystis aeruginosa) measured by

)07

different physiological and morphologic parameters. Chemosphere 81, 1118–1123.

)08

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.09.001.

)10 )11 )12 )13

AC C

)09

EP

)05

Xiao, X., Han, Z.Y., Chen, Y.X., Liang, X.Q., Li, H., Qian, Y.C., 2011. Optimization of FDA-PI method using flow cytometry to measure metabolic activity of the cyanobacteria, Microcystis aeruginosa. Phys. Chem. Earth 36, 424–429. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2010.03.028. Yang, C.Y., Liu, S.J., Zhou, S.W., Wu, H.F., Yu, J.B., Xia, C.H., 2011. Allelochemical

33

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

ethyl 2-methyl acetoacetate (EMA) induces oxidative damage and antioxidant

)15

responses in Phaeodactylum tricornutum. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 100, 93–103.

)1)

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pestbp.2011.02.014.

RI PT

)14

Yang, W., Tang, Z., Zhou, F., Zhang, W., Song, L., 2013. Toxicity studies of tetracycline

)18

on Microcystis aeruginosa and Selenastrum capricornutum. Environ. Toxicol.

)19

Pharmacol. 35, 320–324. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.etap.2013.01.006.

)20

Yu, J.Q., Zhou, Y.H., Huang, L.F., Allen, D.J., 2002. Chill-induced inhibition of

SC

)17

photosynthesis: genotypic variation within Cucumis sativus. Plant cell Physiol. 43,

)22

1182–1188. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcf134.

)23

M AN U

)21

Yu, Y., Kong, F., Wang, M., Qian, L., Shi, X., 2007. Determination of short-term copper toxicity in a multispecies microalgal population using flow cytometry. Ecotoxicol.

)25

Environ. Saf. 66, 49–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2005.10.014.

)2)

TE D

)24

Zhu, J., Liu, B., Wang, J., Gao, Y., Wu, Z., 2010. Study on the mechanism of allelopathic influence on cyanobacteria and chlorophytes by submerged macrophyte

)28

(Myriophyllum spicatum) and its secretion. Aquat. Toxicol. 98, 196–203.

AC C

)29

EP

)27

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2010.02.011.

34

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Highlights: ● P1NA and P2NA with similar molecular structure, only P1NA was found high toxic to M. aeruginosa.

RI PT

● ROS induced by P1NA could the reason of the growth inhibition of M. aeruginosa.

● The formation of 1,4-naphthoquinone was the key factor to generate excessive

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

ROS.