Journal Pre-proof Comparative studies on the effects of sodium phenobarbital and two other constitutive androstane receptor (CAR) activators on induction of cytochrome P450 enzymes and replicative DNA synthesis in cultured hepatocytes from wild type and CAR knockout rats Manuela Goettel, Ivana Fegert, Naveed Honarvar, Audrey Vardy, Corinne Haines, Lynsey R. Chatham, Brian G. Lake
PII:
S0300-483X(20)30033-0
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2020.152394
Reference:
TOX 152394
To appear in:
Toxicology
Received Date:
12 November 2019
Revised Date:
31 January 2020
Accepted Date:
1 February 2020
Please cite this article as: Goettel M, Fegert I, Honarvar N, Vardy A, Haines C, Chatham LR, Lake BG, Comparative studies on the effects of sodium phenobarbital and two other constitutive androstane receptor (CAR) activators on induction of cytochrome P450 enzymes and replicative DNA synthesis in cultured hepatocytes from wild type and CAR knockout rats, Toxicology (2020), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2020.152394
This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. © 2019 Published by Elsevier.
Comparative studies on the effects of sodium phenobarbital and two other constitutive androstane receptor (CAR) activators on induction of cytochrome P450 enzymes and replicative DNA synthesis in cultured hepatocytes from wild type and CAR knockout rats
a
BASF SE, Carl-Bosch-Strasse 38, 67056 Ludwigshafen, Germany
ro
b
of
Manuela Goettela,*
[email protected], Ivana Fegerta, Naveed Honarvara, Audrey Vardyb, Corinne Hainesb, Lynsey R. Chathamb, Brian G. Lakeb,c
Concept Life Sciences (formerly CXR Biosciences Ltd.), 2, James Lindsay Place, Dundee Technopole, Dundee DD1 5JJ, United Kingdom c
re
-p
Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, UK
*
ur na
lP
Corresponding author at: BASF SE, Carl-Bosch-Strasse 38, 67056 Ludwigshafen, Germany
ABSTRACT
Nongenotoxic chemicals can produce liver tumours in rats and mice by a mitogenic mode of
Jo
action involving activation of the constitutive androstane receptor (CAR). The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of cultured hepatocytes from normal (wild type; WT) and CAR knockout (KO) rats to screen compounds as potential activators of rat CAR and to validate this test system. Cultured hepatocytes from male Sprague-Dawley WT and CAR KO rats were treated with either 100 and 1000 µM sodium phenobarbital (NaPB), 3-100 µM fluquinconazole (FQZ), or 3-300 µM 3-(difluoromethyl)-1-methyl-N-(3´,4´,6-trifluoro[1,1´-biphenyl]-2-yl)-1H1
pyrazole-4-carboxamide (TI1) for 96 h. Induction of cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes was monitored by measurement of 7-pentoxyresorufin O-depentylase (PROD), 7-benzyloxyresorufin O-debenzylase (BROD) and 7-benzyloxyquinoline O-debenzylase (BQ) activities. Hepatocytes undergoing replicative DNA synthesis (RDS) were labelled by adding 10 µM 5-bromo-2´deoxyuridine to the culture medium for determination of the hepatocyte labelling index. The treatment of WT, but not of CAR KO, rat hepatocytes with NaPB, FQZ and TI1 increased
of
hepatocyte RDS and induced CYP2B-dependent PROD activity. In contrast, all three compounds
ro
increased CYP2B/3A-dependent BROD and CYP3A-dependent BQ activities in both WT and CAR KO rat hepatocytes. Hepatocyte RDS was increased in both WT and CAR KO rat
-p
hepatocytes by treatment with 25 ng/ml epidermal growth factor as a positive control. Overall,
re
these results demonstrate that the effects of three CAR activators on RDS and CYP2B enzyme induction are abolished in cultured CAR KO rat hepatocytes. As demonstrated by this validation
lP
study, the CAR KO hepatocyte model is a useful in vitro mechanistic tool for the rapid screening of chemicals as potential activators of rat CAR.
ur na
Key Words: Sodium phenobarbital; fluquinconazole; fluxapyroxad derivative, constitutive androstane receptor (CAR); CAR knockout rats; cultured hepatocytes 1. Introduction
Jo
A number of nongenotoxic chemicals have been shown to produce liver enlargement, induction of cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes and liver tumour formation in the rat and mouse. One such group of nongenotoxic chemicals comprise activators of the constitutive androstane receptor (CAR), which is associated with the induction of CYP2B subfamily enzymes (Omiecinski et al., 2011). Phenobarbital (PB) and its sodium salt (sodium phenobarbital; NaPB) are model CAR activators which produce liver enlargement, stimulation of hepatocyte replicative DNA synthesis 2
(RDS), induction of CYP2B and other CYP subfamily enzymes and liver tumours in rats and mice (Cohen, 2010; Elcombe et al., 2014; IARC, 2001; Lake, 2009, 2018; Whysner et al., 1996). In a recent evaluation of the MOA for PB-induced rodent liver tumour formation, the key events were identified as CAR activation, altered gene expression specific to CAR activation, increased cell proliferation, the development of altered hepatic foci and finally liver tumour formation (Elcombe et al., 2014). Associative events for this MOA included liver hypertrophy, induction of
of
CYP2B subfamily enzymes and inhibition of apoptosis.
ro
In assessing the hepatic effects of rodent liver CAR activators, studies in mice lacking CAR
-p
(CAR knockout (KO) mice) have been particularly valuable. For example, studies in CAR KO mice have demonstrated that PB does not produce liver hypertrophy, induce Cyp2b enzymes or
re
increase RDS (Huang et al., 2005; Wei et al., 2000; Yamamoto et al., 2004). Moreover, PB did not promote liver tumours in CAR knockout mice after initiation with the genotoxic agent
lP
diethylnitrosamine (DEN), or after treatment with the potent mouse CAR activator 4-bis[2-(3,5dichloropyridyloxy)]benzene (TCPOBOP; Omiecinski et al., 2011), either with or without prior
ur na
DEN administration (Huang et al., 2005; Yamamoto et al., 2004). Rodent CAR activators can produce liver tumours in both the rat and mouse (Elcombe et al., 2014; Lake, 2018). While mice are generally more susceptible to liver tumour formation by CAR
Jo
activators some compounds, including the natural pyrethrins (Osimitz and Lake, 2009) and the synthetic pyrethroids metofluthrin (Yamada et al., 2009) and momfluorothrin (Okuda et al., 2017), have been shown to produce liver tumours only in the rat. Thus, in order to evaluate the hepatic effects of nongenotoxic CAR activators in these two rodent species, both CAR KO rat and mouse models are required.
3
Recently, CAR KO rats have become commercially available and have been employed for some in vivo studies on the hepatic effects of NaPB and other CAR activators (Forbes et al., 2017; Haines et al., 2018; Okuda et al., 2017). An investigation by Forbes et al. (2017) demonstrated that TCPOBOP increased hepatic CYP2B mRNA levels in normal (i.e. wild type; WT) rats but not in CAR KO rats; whereas in another study NaPB increased relative liver weight, stimulated RDS and induced CYP2B enzyme activity and mRNA levels in WT but not in
of
CAR KO rats (Haines et al., 2018). Similarly NaPB, metofluthrin and momfluorothrin were
ro
shown to increase relative liver weight, stimulate RDS and to induce CYP2B mRNA levels in
-p
WT but not in CAR KO rats (Okuda et al., 2017).
The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of cultured hepatocytes from normal (WT) and
re
CAR KO rats as an in vitro system to screen compounds as potential rat liver CAR activators. The test compounds selected for these studies were the model rodent liver CAR activator NaPB
lP
(Cohen, 2010; Elcombe et al., 2014; Lake, 2009), the triazole fungicide fluquinconazole (FQZ) and 3-(difluoromethyl)-1-methyl-N-(3´, 4´, 6-trifluoro[1,1´-biphenyl]-2-yl)-1H-pyrazole-4-
ur na
carboxamide (TI1). Previous studies have demonstrated that FQZ is a nongenotoxic agent which produces liver tumours in both rats and mice, with investigative studies demonstrating a CAR activation MOA involving increases in liver weight, centrilobular hypertrophy and induction of CYP2B enzymes (EFSA, 2011). TI1 is structurally related to the nongenotoxic pyrazole
Jo
carboxamide fungicide fluxapyroxad which produces liver tumours in the rat, with investigative studies demonstrating a CAR activation MOA involving increases in liver weight, centrilobular hypertrophy and induction of CYP2B enzymes (EFSA, 2012; EPA, 2012). 2. Materials and methods 2.1. Materials 4
FQZ (molecular weight 376.2; purity 99.1%) and TI1 (molecular weight 381.3; purity >99.5%) were provided by BASF SE (Ludwigshafen am Rhein, Germany). Sodium phenobarbital (NaPB; purity ≥ 99%), 5-bromo-2´-deoxyuridine (BrdU), epidermal growth factor (EGF), CYP substrates and metabolites, Leibowitz L15 culture medium and other tissue culture reagents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Poole, Dorset, UK). Uncoated 6- and 96-well plates and 25 cm2 Falcon flasks were obtained from Greiner Bio-One Ltd. (Stroudwater Business Park, Stonehouse,
of
UK).
ro
2.2. Animals
Male Sprague-Dawley WT and CAR KO (on a Sprague Dawley background) rats (aged 6-8
-p
weeks) were obtained from Horizon Discovery (PO Box 122, Boyertown, PA, USA). Rats were
re
housed in groups on saw-dust in solid-bottom polypropylene cages and were allowed free access to water and powdered RM1 laboratory animal diet (Special Diets Services, Witham, Essex, UK)
lP
and were housed in accommodation with a 12:12 h light:dark cycle. Temperature and relative humidity were maintained between 19 and 23°C and 40 and 70%, respectively. Rats were
ur na
allowed to acclimatize to these conditions for at least 5 days before use. All animal procedures were performed under a UK Home Office license and all animal studies were approved by the Ethical Review Committee of the University of Dundee (Dundee, Scotland, UK).
Jo
2.3. Hepatocyte isolation and culture
Hepatocytes from male Sprague- Dawley WT (8-10 weeks old) and CAR KO (10-12 weeks
old) rats were obtained by collagenase perfusion as described previously (Mitchell et al., 1984). Hepatocyte viabilities (determined by trypan blue exclusion) were in excess of 80% and hepatocytes from two independent perfusions were pooled for all studies. Rat hepatocytes were plated in uncoated 96- or 6-well plates (for cytotoxicity and RDS studies, respectively) or in 5
uncoated 25 cm2 Falcon flasks (for CYP enzyme assays) in Leibowitz L15 culture medium with additions as described previously (Plant et al., 1998) and cultured in a humidified incubator at 37°C under air for 4 h. At the end of the attachment period, treatment of hepatocytes was commenced by changing the culture medium to Leibowitz L15 medium containing either 0 (control), 100 or 1000 μM NaPB, 3, 10, 30 or 100 μM FQZ, or 10, 30, 100 and 300 μM TII. All media contained 0.1 % (v/v) dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO). Subsequently, the medium was
of
changed at 24 h intervals to fresh medium containing the above concentrations of either NaPB,
ro
FQZ or TI1 for a total treatment period of 96 h. To study RDS, 10 µM BrdU was added to the medium for the last 72 h of treatment. Rat hepatocytes were also treated with 25 ng/ml EGF for
-p
72 h to serve as a positive control for the RDS studies. Six replicate wells at each concentration
re
of control, PB, FQZ, TI1 and EGF were examined for cytotoxicity, three replicates at each concentration of control and the test compounds for CYP enzyme activities and five replicates of
lP
control, each concentration of the test compounds and EGF for RDS studies. At the end of the 96 h treatment period, hepatocyte monolayers were either assayed directly, harvested by scraping
ur na
into SET buffer (0.25 M sucrose containing 5 mM EDTA and 20 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7.4) or were fixed in methanol. 2.4. Cytotoxicity assay
Jo
The cytotoxicity of the test compounds to rat hepatocytes was assessed by ATP depletion. At the end of the 96 h treatment period, rat hepatocyte monolayers were assayed for ATP content using a Promega (Delta House, Southampton Science Park, Southampton, UK) CellTiter-Glo® luminescent cell viability assay kit. Results were expressed as a percentage of the maximum amount of ATP released from control (0.1% (v/v) DMSO only) cultures. 2.5. CYP enzyme assays 6
Hepatocyte monolayers scraped into SET buffer were sonicated and stored at -70ºC until analysis. Protein content was determined by the method of Lowry et al. (1951), employing bovine serum albumin as standard. 7-Pentoxyresorufin O-depentylase (PROD), 7benzyloxyresorufin O-debenzylase (BROD) and 7-benzyloxyquinoline O-debenzylase (BQ) activities were determined as described previously (Choi et al., 2017; Ross et al., 2010).
of
2.6. Replicative DNA synthesis (RDS) assay
ro
Hepatocyte monolayers were fixed in ice-cold methanol for 10 min and then washed with
phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and then again treated with ice cold methanol for 10 min and
-p
subsequently washed with PBS. Hepatocyte monolayers were stored in PBS at 4°C for 96 h and then processed for BrdU immunocytochemistry as described previously (Ross et al., 2010),
re
except that hepatocyte monolayers were not counterstained with hematoxylin. The BrdU labeling
lP
index (i.e. percentage of hepatocyte nuclei undergoing RDS) was determined by counting approximately 1200-1600 nuclei in 4 random areas from each well.
ur na
2.7. Liver microsomal CYP inhibition assays
Liver microsomes were prepared from male Sprague-Dawley rats treated with either 500 ppm NaPB in the diet for 7 days or with 100 mg/kg/day pregnenolone-16α-carbonitrile (PCN) orally for 7 days (Haines et al., 2018). Microsomes from NaPB-treated rats were assayed for PROD
Jo
activity in the presence of either 0-100 µM FQZ or 0-100 µM TI1 and liver microsomes from PCN-treated rats were assayed for BQ activity in the presence of 0-300 µM FQZ. FQZ and TI1 were added to incubation mixtures in dimethylformamide (maximum concentration 1% (v/v)). IC50 values were calculated using Prism software (GraphPad, San Diego, CA, USA). 2.8. Statistical analysis 7
Results are expressed as mean ± SD. Statistical significance between and control and treated groups was determined by two-tailed Student’s t-tests. 3. Results Male Sprague-Dawley rat WT and CAR KO hepatocytes were cultured in control medium (0.1% (v/v) DMSO only) and in medium containing either 100 or 1000 μM NaPB, 3-100 μM FQZ, or
of
10-300 μM TII for 96 h and effects on cytotoxicity, CYP enzyme activities and RDS determined.
ro
3.1. Effect on hepatocyte cytotoxicity
The cytotoxicity of the test compounds to rat hepatocytes was determined by measurement of
-p
ATP content. Treatment with 100 and 1000 µM NaPB either had little effect or produced
re
statistically significant increases in ATP content of both WT and CAR KO rat hepatocytes (Fig. 1A and 1B). The treatment of WT and CAR KO rat hepatocytes with 3-30 µM FQZ did not
lP
result in any significant decreases in ATP content, with 100 µM FQZ only producing a small decrease in ATP content in WT and CAR KO rat hepatocytes to 89 and 94% of control,
ur na
respectively (Fig. 1A). While treatment of WT and CAR KO rat hepatocytes with 10-100 µM TI1 did not result in any significant cytotoxicity (reflected by decreases in hepatocyte ATP content), treatment with 300 µM TI1 significantly decreased WT and CAR KO hepatocyte ATP content to 47 and 5% of control, respectively (Fig. 1B). The increases in hepatocyte ATP content
Jo
observed at some concentrations of NaPB, FQZ and TI1 are not considered to be associated with cytotoxicity, but could represent increased hepatocyte intermediary metabolism. 3.2. Effect on hepatocyte CYP enzymes Rat hepatocyte PROD, BROD and BQ activities were determined as markers of induction of CYP2B, CYP2B/3A and CYP3A subfamily enzymes, respectively (Lubet et al., 1990; Renwick 8
et al., 2001). The treatment of WT rat hepatocytes with 100 and 1000 µM NaPB significantly increased PROD (to 392 and 557% of control), BROD (to 642 and 1110% of control) and BQ activities (to 161 and 367% of control) (Fig. 2 and 3). In contrast, the treatment of CAR KO rat hepatocytes with NaPB had no statistically significant effect on PROD enzyme activity and produced smaller increases in BROD and BQ activities than those observed in WT rat hepatocytes (Fig. 2 and 3). Treatment of CAR KO rat hepatocytes with 1000 μM NaPB increased
of
BROD and BQ enzyme activities to 232 and 246% of control, respectively (Fig. 2) and to 211
ro
and 253% of control, respectively (Fig. 3).
-p
The treatment of WT rat hepatocytes with FQZ produced statistically significant increases in PROD (up to 318% of control, Fig. 2A), BROD (up to 539% of control, Fig. 2B) and BQ (up to
re
554% of control, Fig. 2C) activities at concentrations of 3 and 10, 3-30 and 3-100 µM, respectively. The induction of CYP enzyme activities was not concentration-dependent with the
lP
greatest increases in PROD, BROD and BQ activities being observed at FQZ concentrations of 3, 3, and 30 µM, respectively. While treatment with 3-100 µM FQZ had no statistically
ur na
significant effect on PROD activity in CAR KO rat hepatocytes (maximum increase 120 % of control, Fig. 2A), statistically significant increases in BROD (up to 221% of control, Fig. 2B) and BQ (up to 586% of control, Fig. 2C) activities were observed in CAR KO rat
Jo
hepatocytes.
The treatment of WT rat hepatocytes with TI1 produced statistically significant increases in
PROD (up to 529% of control, Fig. 3A), BROD (up to 978% of control, Fig. 3B) and BQ (up to 402% of control, Fig. 3C) activities at concentrations of 10-100, 10-300 and 10-100 µM, respectively. The induction of CYP enzyme activities was not concentration-dependent with the greatest increases in PROD, BROD and BQ activities being observed at TI1 concentrations of 9
10, 10, and 100 µM, respectively. While treatment with 10-300 µM TI1 had no statistically significant effect on PROD activity in CAR KO rat hepatocytes (Fig. 3A) and only produced a small increase in BROD activity to 148% of control at a concentration of 100 μM (Fig. 3B), treatment with 10-300 μM TI1 produced statistically significant increases in BQ activity (up to 316% of control, Fig. 3C).
of
3.3. Effect on hepatocyte replicative DNA synthesis (RDS)
ro
Rat WT and CAR KO hepatocytes were cultured in control medium (0.1% (v/v) DMSO only) and medium containing either NaPB, FQZ or TI1 for 96h, with the DNA precursor BrdU being
-p
added during the last 72h of treatment. As a positive control for induction of hepatocyte RDS, WT and CAR KO rat hepatocytes were also treated with 25 ng/ml EGF. Treatment with 100 and
re
1000 µM NaPB significantly increased RDS in WT rat hepatocytes to 182 and 180% of control,
lP
respectively, but had no significant effect on RDS in CAR KO rat hepatocytes (Fig. 4A and 4B). The treatment of WT rat hepatocytes with 3 and 10 µM FQZ significantly increased RDS to 160 and 150% of control, respectively, whereas treatment with 30 and 100 µM FQZ significantly
ur na
decreased RDS in CAR KO rat hepatocytes (Fig. 4A). Statistically significant increases in RDS to 190, 174 and 154% of control were observed in WT rat hepatocytes treated with 10, 30 and 100 µM TI1, respectively, whereas treatment with 300 µM TI1 resulted in a significant decrease
Jo
in RDS (Fig. 4B). Treatment with TI1 did not produce any significant increases in RDS in CAR KO rat hepatocytes, with marked cytotoxicity being observed in CAR KO rat hepatocytes treated with 300 µM TI1 (Fig. 4B). The treatment of WT and CAR KO rat hepatocytes with 25 ng/ml EGF significantly increased RDS to 406 and 434 % of control, respectively (Fig. 4A and 4B). 3.4. Effect of FQZ and TI1 on hepatic microsomal PROD and BQ activities
10
While FQZ and TI1 induced CYP enzyme activities in cultured WT rat hepatocytes, the magnitude of stimulation of PROD and BROD activities was not concentration-dependent, with a reduction in the magnitude of stimulation of BQ activity also being observed at the highest concentrations of FQZ and TI1 examined (Fig. 2 and 3). In order to assess whether these effects were due to enzyme inhibition by the test compounds, the effect of FQZ and TI1 on PROD and BQ activities was determined in liver microsomes prepared from male Sprague-Dawley rats
of
treated with either NaPB or PCN to induce CYP2B and CYP3A enzymes, respectively (Elcombe
ro
et al., 2014; Omiecinski et al., 2011). The addition of either 0.01-100 µM FQZ or 0.01-100 µM TI1 to liver microsomes from NaPB treated rats resulted in a concentration-dependent inhibition
-p
of hepatic microsomal PROD activity (Fig. 5). Calculated IC50 values for inhibition of
re
microsomal PROD activity were 1.4 and 12.9 µM for FQZ and TI1, respectively. The addition of 0.1-300 µM FQZ to liver microsomes from PCN treated rats resulted in a concentration-
lP
dependent inhibition of hepatic microsomal BQ activity, with a calculated IC50 value of 2.3 µM (Fig. 5). The effect of 0.1-300 µM TI1 on BQ activity in liver microsomes from PCN treated rats
ur na
was not investigated, as in a pilot study enzyme activity was only inhibited by around 50% at a TI1 concentration of 100 µM (data not shown). 4. Discussion
Jo
The treatment of WT male Sprague-Dawley rat hepatocytes with NaPB resulted in the expected effects of induction of CYP2B- and CYP3A-dependent enzyme activities and a stimulation of hepatocyte RDS (Elcombe et al., 2014; Lake, 2009, 2018; Peffer et al., 2018). In contrast, NaPB did not induce CYP2B-dependent PROD activity or stimulate RDS in cultured hepatocytes from CAR KO rats. While treatment with NaPB resulted in some induction of BROD and BQ activities in CAR KO rat hepatocytes, the increase in these enzyme activities are 11
most likely attributable to crosstalk between CAR and the pregnane X receptor (PXR) (Maglich et al., 2002; Moore et al., 2000; Omiecinski et al., 2011; Yoshinari et al., 2008). The treatment of WT rat hepatocytes with FQZ resulted in an induction of PROD activity and a stimulation of RDS, thus confirming that this compound is a CAR activator in rat liver. Treatment with FQZ also induced hepatocyte BROD and BQ activities in WT rat hepatocytes.
of
Unlike NaPB, the induction of hepatocyte CYP enzyme activities by FQZ in cultured WT rat hepatocytes was not concentration-dependent. However, at the concentrations examined FQZ
ro
was not markedly cytotoxic to WT rat hepatocytes. Additional investigations with liver
-p
microsomes from NaPB- and PCN-treated rats showed that FQZ was an inhibitor of both CYP2B-dependent PROD and CYP3A-dependent BQ enzyme activities. Overall, the lack of
re
concentration-dependency in the induction of CYP2B and CYP3A subfamily enzymes by FQZ in cultured WT rat hepatocytes observed in this study appears to be attributable to the inhibition
lP
of CYP-dependent enzyme activities by the test compound.
The treatment of WT rat hepatocytes with TI1 resulted in an induction of PROD activity and a
ur na
stimulation of RDS, thus confirming that this compound is a CAR activator in rat liver. Treatment with TI1 also induced hepatocyte BROD and BQ activities in WT rat hepatocytes. The induction of hepatocyte CYP enzyme activities by TI1 in cultured WT rat hepatocytes was
Jo
not concentration-dependent, with the highest concentration examined producing some cytotoxicity. Like FQZ, TI1 was also found to be an inhibitor of CTP2B-dependent PROD activity in liver microsomes from NaPB-treated rats. The lack of concentration-dependency of TI1 on CYP enzymes in cultured WT rat hepatocytes appears to be at least partially attributable to enzyme inhibition, with effects on CYP enzymes and hepatocyte RDS at the highest concentration examined being due to cytotoxicity. 12
In this study only NaPB produced concentration-dependent effects on CYP2B enzyme induction, both FQZ and TI1 being shown to produce a concentration-dependent inhibition of hepatic microsomal PROD activity. The effects of FQZ and TI1 are thus, similar to those reported for the CAR activator nitrapyrin (LaRocca et al., 2017) and the combined CAR/peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPARα) activator pronamide (LeBaron et al., 2014), which are both nongenotoxic agents producing liver tumours in the mouse. Inhibition
of
of CYP enzyme activity can complicate the interpretation of the effects of a potential CAR
ro
activator. As an alternative to the measurement of CYP enzyme activities the effects on CYP mRNA levels can be determined in cultured rat hepatocytes, as has been demonstrated for
-p
several CAR activators (Gährs et al., 2013; Okuda et al., 2017; Price et al., 2008; Soldatow et al.,
re
2016). In addition to determining effects on CYP enzyme activities and/or mRNA levels, the RNA interference (siRNA) technique has also been employed in some studies with rat
lP
hepatocytes to probe the role of CAR in the induction of CYP2B mRNA levels (Deguchi et al., 2009; Gährs et al., 2013; Okuda et al., 2017). Other factors important in interpreting
ur na
concentration-response relationships in cultured hepatocytes include the potential cytotoxicity of the test compound and its solubility in tissue culture medium.
Jo
Unlike effects in WT rat hepatocytes, the treatment of CAR KO rat hepatocytes with both FQZ and TI1 did not result in any induction of CYP2B-dependent PROD activity. While some effects on BROD and BQ activities were observed, these are most likely attributable to effects on PXR rather than on CAR. Treatment with neither FQZ nor TI1 produced any stimulation of RDS in cultured CAR KO rat hepatocytes, with significant decreases in RDS being observed after treatment with 30 and 100 µM FQZ and 300 µM TI1. While the inhibition of RDS in CAR KO 13
rat hepatocytes treated with 300 µM TI1 appears to be attributable to cytotoxicity, the effects of 30 and 100 µM FQZ were not due to cytotoxicity as there was not any marked reduction in hepatocyte ATP levels. The treatment of both WT and CAR KO rat hepatocytes with EGF resulted in significant increases in RDS, thus confirming the potential responsiveness of
of
hepatocytes from both WT and CAR KO rats to a known mitogen.
ro
Overall, this validation study demonstrates that hepatocytes from WT and CAR KO rats can be employed as a rapid in vitro test system to screen compounds for activation of rat hepatic CAR.
-p
Studies with the model rodent liver CAR activator NaPB and also with two other CAR activators, namely FQZ and TI1, demonstrated that CYP2B enzyme induction and stimulation of
re
hepatocyte RDS was only observed in WT and not in CAR KO rat hepatocytes. The stimulation
lP
of RDS is a pivotal key event in the MOA for liver tumour formation by rodent CAR activators and is the basis for the observed species difference between rodents (rats and mice) and humans in that CAR activators stimulate RDS in rodent hepatocytes, but not in human hepatocytes
ur na
(Cohen, 2010; Elcombe et al., 2014; Lake, 2009, 2018; Peffer et al., 2018). While CAR KO rat hepatocytes are clearly refractory to the mitogenic effects of CAR activators, other mitogenic agents (e.g. PPARα activators) would be expected to stimulate RDS in this model system. The
Jo
responsiveness of CAR KO rat hepatocytes to a mitogenic agent was demonstrated by significant increases in RDS following treatment with EGF. In terms of evaluating the effect of chemicals on RDS in cultured hepatocytes, it is important to utilise concentrations up to those which produce either significant cytotoxicity or an inhibition of RDS in order to confirm whether the test compound can or cannot stimulate RDS. This is particularly important in species differences
14
studies where CAR activators, which are mitogenic agents in rodent hepatocytes, have been shown not to stimulate RDS in cultured human hepatocytes (Elcombe et al., 2014; Lake, 2018). The results obtained in this in vitro rat hepatocyte study are in agreement with previous in vivo studies in the rat where NaPB and other CAR activators have been shown not to increase CYP2B enzyme activities and/or mRNA levels and not to stimulate RDS in CAR KO rats (Forbes et al.,
of
2017; Haines et al., 2018; Okuda et al., 2017). The WT and CAR KO hepatocyte model offers significant advantages over in vivo studies in terms of a marked reduction in the numbers of
ro
animals required and the ability to study a wide range of concentrations of the test compounds.
-p
In conclusion, the CAR KO hepatocyte model is a useful in vitro mechanistic tool for the rapid
Disclosure statement
lP
re
screening of chemicals as potential activators of rat CAR.
ur na
M. Goettel, I. Fegert, and N. Honarvar are all employed by BASF, which manufactures FQZ and the fluxapyroxad derivative TI1. All other authors have been involved in studies performed for
Jo
BASF. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of this article.
Declaration of interests
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
15
Acknowledgment
Jo
ur na
lP
re
-p
ro
of
This work was sponsored by BASF (Ludwigshafen am Rhein, Germany).
16
References Choi, C.J., Rushton, E.K., Vardy, A., Higgins, L., Augello, A., Parod, R.J., 2017. Mode of action and human relevance of THF-induced mouse liver tumors. Toxicol. Lett. 276, 138-143. Cohen, S.M., 2010. Evaluation of possible carcinogenic risk to humans based on liver tumors in rodent assays: the two-year bioassay is no longer necessary. Toxicol. Pathol. 38, 487-501.
ro
of
Deguchi, Y., Yamada, T., Hirose, Y., Nagahori, H., Kushida, M., Sumida, K., Sukata, T., Tomigahara, Y., Nishioka, K., Uwagawa, S., Kawamura, S., Okuno, Y., 2009. Mode of action analysis for the synthetic pyrethroid metofluthrin-induced rat liver tumors: evidence for hepatic CYP2B induction and hepatocyte proliferation. Toxicol. Sci. 108, 69-80.
-p
EFSA, 2011. Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance fluquinconazole. EFSA Journal 2011; 9(5):2096. EFSA, 2012. Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance fluxapyroxad (BAS 700 F). EFSA Journal 2012; 10(1):2522.
lP
re
Elcombe, C.R., Peffer, R.C., Wolf, D.C., Bailey, J., Bars, R., Bell, D., Cattley, R.C., Ferguson, S.S., Geter, D., Goetz A., Goodman, J.I., Hester, S., Jacobs, A., Omiecinski. C.J., Schoeny, R., Xie, W., Lake, B.G., 2014. Mode of action and human relevance analysis for nuclear receptormediated liver toxicity: a case study with phenobarbital as a model constitutive androstane receptor (CAR) activator. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 44, 64-82. EPA, 2012. Pesticide fact sheet: fluxapyroxad.
ur na
Forbes, K.P., Kouranova, E., Tinker, D., Janowski, K., Cortner, D., McCoy, A., Cui, X., 2017. Creation and preliminary characterization of pregnane X receptor and constitutive androstane receptor knockout rats. Drug Metab. Dispos. 45, 1068-1076.
Jo
Gährs, M., Roos, R., Andersson, P.L., Schrenk, D., 2013. Role of the nuclear xenobiotic receptors CAR and PXR in induction of cytochromes P450 by non-dioxinlike polychlorinated biphenyls in cultured rat hepatocytes. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 272, 77-85. Haines, C., Chatham, L.R., Vardy, A., Elcombe, C.R., Foster, J.R., Lake, B.G., 2018. Comparison of the hepatic and thyroid gland effects of sodium phenobarbital in wild type and constitutive androstane receptor (CAR) knockout rats and pregnenolone-16α-carbonitrile in wild type and pregnane X receptor (PXR) knockout rats. Toxicology 400-401, 20-27. Huang, W., Zhang, J., Washington, M., Liu, J., Parant, J.M., Lozano, G., Moore, D.D., 2005. Xenobiotic stress induces hepatomegaly and liver tumors via the nuclear receptor constitutive androstane receptor. Mol. Endocrinol. 19, 1646-1653.
17
IARC, 2001. Some thyrotropic agents: phenobarbital and its sodium salt. IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans 79, 161-288. Lake, B.G., 2009. Species differences in the hepatic effects of inducers of CYP2B and CYP4A subfamily forms: relationship to rodent liver tumour formation. Xenobiotica 39, 582-596. Lake, B.G., 2018. Human relevance of rodent liver tumour formation by constitutive androstane receptor (CAR) activators. Toxicol. Res. 7, 697-717.
of
LaRocca, J.L., Rasoulpour, R.J., Gollapudi, B.B., Eisenbrandt D.L., Murphy LA., LeBaron M.J., 2017. Integration of novel approaches demonstrates simultaneous metabolic inactivation and CAR-mediated hepatocarcinogenesis of a nitrification inhibitor. Toxicol. Rep. 4, 586-597.
ro
LeBaron M.J., Rasoulpour, R.J., Gollapudi, B.B., Sura R., Kan, H.L, Schisler, M.R., Pottenger, L.H., Papineni, S, Eisenbrandt. D.L., 2014. Characterization of nuclear receptor-mediated murine hepatocarcinogenesis of the herbicide pronamide and its human relevance. Toxicol. Sci. 142, 7492.
-p
Lowry, O.H., Rosebrough, N.J., Farr, A.L., Randall, R.J., 1951. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J. Biol. Chem. 193, 265-275.
re
Lubet, R.A., Syi, J.-L., Nelson, J.O., Nims, R.W., 1990. Induction of hepatic cytochrome P-450 mediated alkoxyresorufin activities in different species by prototype P-450 inducers. Chem.Biol. Interact. 75, 325-339.
lP
Maglich, J.M., Stoltz, C.M., Goodwin, B., Hawkins-Brown, D., Moore, J.T., Kliewer, S.A., 2002. Nuclear pregnane X receptor and constitutive androstane receptor regulate overlapping but distinct sets of genes involved in xenobiotic detoxification. Mol. Pharmacol. 62, 638-646.
ur na
Mitchell, A.M., Bridges, J.W., Elcombe, C.R., 1984. Factors influencing peroxisome proliferation in cultured rat hepatocytes. Arch. Toxicol. 55, 239-246. Moore, L.B., Parks, D.J., Jones, S.A., Bledsoe, R.K., Consler, T.G., Stimmel, J.B., Goodwin, B., Liddle, C., Blanchard, S.G., Willson, T.M., Collins, J.L., Kliewer, S.A., 2000. Orphan nuclear receptors constitutive androstane receptor and pregnane X receptor share xenobiotic steroid ligands. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 15122-15127.
Jo
Okuda, Y., Kushida, M., Sumida, K., Nagahori, H., Nakamura, Y., Higuchi, H., Kawamura, S., Lake, B.G., Cohen, S.M., Yamada, T., 2017. Mode of action analysis for rat hepatocellular tumors produced by the synthetic pyrethroid momfluorothrin: evidence for activation of the constitutive androstane receptor and mitogenicity in rat hepatocytes. Toxicol. Sci. 158, 412-430. Omiecinski, C.J., Vanden Heuvel, J.P., Perdew, G.H., Peters, J.M., 2011. Xenobiotic metabolism, disposition, and regulation by receptors: from biochemical phenomenon to predictors of major toxicities. Toxicol. Sci. 120 (S1), S49-S75. Osimitz, T.G., Lake, B.G., 2009. Mode-of-action analysis for induction of rat liver tumors by pyrethrins: relevance to human cancer risk. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 39, 501-511. 18
Peffer, R.C., LeBaron, M.J., Battalora, M., Bomann, W.H., Werner, C., Aggarwal, M., Rowe, R.R., Tinwell, H., 2018. Minimum datasets to establish a CAR-mediated mode of action for rodent liver tumors. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 96, 106-120. Plant, N.J., Horley, N.J., Dickins, M., Hasmall, S., Elcombe, C.R., Bell, D.R., 1998. The coordinate regulation of DNA synthesis and suppression of apoptosis is differentially regulated by the liver growth agents, phenobarbital and methylclofenapate. Carcinogenesis 19, 1521-1527. Price, R.J., Giddings, A.M., Scott, M.P., Walters, D.G., Capen, C.C., Osimitz, T.G., Lake, B.G., 2008. Effect of pyrethrins on cytochrome P3450 forms in cultured rat and human hepatocytes. Toxicology 243, 84-95.
ro
of
Renwick, A.B., Lavignette, G., Worboys, P.D., Williams, B., Surry, D., Lewis, D.F.V., Price, R.J., Lake, B.G., Evans, D.C., 2001. Evaluation of 7-benzyloxy-4-trifluoromethylcoumarin and some other 7-hydroxy-4-trifluoromethylcoumarin derivatives and 7-benzyloxyquinoline as fluorescent substrates for rat hepatic cytochrome P450 enzymes. Xenobiotica 31, 861-878.
re
-p
Ross, J., Plummer, S.M., Rode, A., Scheer, N., Bower, C.C., Vogel, O., Henderson, C.J., Wolf, C.R., Elcombe, C.R., 2010. Human constitutive androstane receptor (CAR) and pregnane X receptor (PXR) support the hypertrophic but not the hyperplastic response to the murine nongenotoxic hepatocarcinogens phenobarbital and chlordane in vivo. Toxicol. Sci. 116, 452466.
lP
Soldatow, V., Peffer, R.C., Trask, O.J., Cowie, D.E., Andersen, M.E., LeCluyse, E., Deisenroth, C., 2016, Development of an in vitro high content imaging assay for quantitative assessment of CAR-dependent mouse, rat, and human primary hepatocyte proliferation. Toxicol. In Vitro 36, 224-237.
ur na
Wei, P., Zhang, J., Egan-Hafley, M., Liang, S., Moore, D.D., 2000. The nuclear receptor CAR mediates specific xenobiotic induction of drug metabolism. Nature 407, 920-923. Whysner, J., Ross, P.M., Williams, G.M., 1996. Phenobarbital mechanistic data and risk assessment: enzyme induction, enhanced cell proliferation, and tumor promotion. Pharmacol. Ther. 71, 153-191.
Jo
Yamada, T., Uwagawa, S., Okuno, Y., Cohen, S.M., Kaneko, H., (2009). Case study: an evaluation of the human relevance of the synthetic pyrethroid metofluthrin-induced liver tumors in rats based on mode of action. Toxicol. Sci. 108, 59-68. Yamamoto, Y., Moore, R., Goldsworthy, T.L., Negishi, M., Maronpot, R.R., 2004. The orphan nuclear receptor constitutive active/androstane receptor is essential for liver tumor promotion by phenobarbital in mice. Cancer Res. 64, 7197-7200. Yoshinari, K., Tien, E., Negishi, M., Honkakoski, P., 2008. Receptor-mediated regulation of cytochromes P450, in Ioannides, C. (Ed.), Cytochromes P450: role in the metabolism and toxicity of drugs and other xenobiotics. RSC Publishing, Cambridge, UK, pp. 417-448.
19
re
-p
ro
of
Legends to Figures
Fig. 1. Effect of NaPB, FQZ and TI1 on rat hepatocyte cytotoxicity employing the ATP assay.
lP
Male Sprague-Dawley WT and CAR KO rat hepatocytes were treated with control medium (0.1% (v/v) DMSO only), medium containing 100 or 1000 µM NaPB and either 3-100 µM FQZ
ur na
(A) or 10-300 µM TI1 (B) for 96 h. Results are expressed as mean ± SD of 6 wells per treatment.
Jo
Values significantly different from control (0.1% (v/v) DMSO only) are: **p<0.01; ***p<0.001.
20
of ro -p re lP ur na Jo
Fig. 2. Effect of NaPB and FQZ on rat hepatocyte PROD (A), BROD (B) and BQ (C) enzyme activities. Male Sprague-Dawley WT and CAR KO rat hepatocytes were treated with control medium (0.1% (v/v) DMSO only) and medium containing either 100 or 1000 µM NaPB or 3-100 µM FQZ for 96 h. Results are expressed as mean ± SD of 3 wells per treatment. Values
21
significantly different from control (0.1% (v/v) DMSO only) are: *p<0.05; **p<0.01;
Jo
ur na
lP
re
-p
ro
of
***p<0.001.
22
Fig. 3. Effect of NaPB and TI1 on rat hepatocyte PROD (A), BROD (B) and BQ (C) enzyme activities. Male Sprague-Dawley WT and CAR KO rat hepatocytes were treated with control medium (0.1% (v/v) DMSO only) and medium containing either 100 or 1000 µM NaPB or 10300 µM TI1 for 96 h. Results are expressed as mean ± SD of 3 wells per treatment. Values significantly different from control (0.1% (v/v) DMSO only) are: *p<0.05; **p<0.01;
ur na
lP
re
-p
ro
of
***p<0.001.
Jo
Fig. 4. Effect of NaPB, FQZ and TI1 on rat hepatocyte RDS. Male Sprague-Dawley WT and CAR KO rat hepatocytes were treated with control medium (0.1% (v/v) DMSO only), medium containing 100 or 1000 µM NaPB, medium containing 25 ng/ml EGF and medium containing either 3-100 µM FQZ (A) or 10-300 µM TI1 (B) for 96 h. Results are expressed as mean ± SD of 5 wells per treatment. Due to marked cytotoxicity (#), no results were obtained for CAR KO
23
hepatocytes treated with 300 µM TI1. Values significantly different from control (0.1% (v/v)
ur na
lP
re
-p
ro
of
DMSO only) are: *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001.
Fig. 5. Inhibition of PROD activity by FQZ and TI1 and BQ activity by FQZ in rat liver microsomes. The effect of 0.01-100 µM FQZ and 0.01-100 µM TI1 on PROD activity was determined in NaPB-induced rat liver microsomes and the effect of 0.1-300 µM FQZ on BQ
Jo
activity was determined in PCN-induced rat liver microsomes. Results are presented as mean values of 2-3 control (no test compound) and 1 or more replicates at each concentration of either FQZ or TI1, with IC50 values shown in parentheses. Control rates of PROD activity in NaPBtreated liver microsomes and BQ activity in PCN-treated liver microsomes were 47 pmol/min/mg protein and 8.1 nmol/min/mg protein, respectively.
24
25
of
ro
-p
re
lP
ur na
Jo