Comparative transcriptomic analysis of shrimp hemocytes in response to acute hepatopancreas necrosis disease (AHPND) causing Vibrio parahemolyticus infection

Comparative transcriptomic analysis of shrimp hemocytes in response to acute hepatopancreas necrosis disease (AHPND) causing Vibrio parahemolyticus infection

Accepted Manuscript Comparative transcriptomic analysis of shrimp hemocytes in response to acute hepatopancreas necrosis disease (AHPND) causing Vibri...

4MB Sizes 0 Downloads 61 Views

Accepted Manuscript Comparative transcriptomic analysis of shrimp hemocytes in response to acute hepatopancreas necrosis disease (AHPND) causing Vibrio parahemolyticus infection Zhihong Zheng, Fan Wang, Jude Juventus Aweya, Ruiwei Li, Defu Yao, Mingqi Zhong, Shengkang Li, Yueling Zhang PII:

S1050-4648(17)30773-8

DOI:

10.1016/j.fsi.2017.12.032

Reference:

YFSIM 5017

To appear in:

Fish and Shellfish Immunology

Received Date: 17 July 2017 Revised Date:

8 December 2017

Accepted Date: 20 December 2017

Please cite this article as: Zheng Z, Wang F, Aweya JJ, Li R, Yao D, Zhong M, Li S, Zhang Y, Comparative transcriptomic analysis of shrimp hemocytes in response to acute hepatopancreas necrosis disease (AHPND) causing Vibrio parahemolyticus infection, Fish and Shellfish Immunology (2018), doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2017.12.032. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

1

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Comparative transcriptomic analysis of shrimp hemocytes in response to

2

acute hepatopancreas necrosis disease (AHPND) causing Vibrio

3

parahemolyticus infection

4

Zhihong Zheng#, Fan Wang#, Jude Juventus Aweya, Ruiwei Li, Defu Yao, Mingqi Zhong,

6

Shengkang Li, Yueling Zhang*

7

RI PT

5

Department of Biology and Guangdong Provincial Key laboratory of Marine Biotechnology,

9

Shantou University, Shantou, Guangdong 515063, China

M AN U

SC

8

10 11

Running title: Shrimp hemocytes response to AHPND V. parahemolyticus infection

12

#

13

*Correspondence to:

These authors contributed equally to this work.

Prof. Yue-ling Zhang, Ph.D. Department of Biology

15

School of Science

16

Shantou University

19 20 21

EP

18

Shantou, Guangdong 515063, China Tel: +86-754-82902580

AC C

17

TE D

14

Fax: +86-754-82902767 E-mail: [email protected]

22 23 24 25 1

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Abstract

27

The recent emergence of acute hepatopancreas necrosis disease (AHPND) in shrimps has

28

posed a major challenge in the shrimp aquaculture industry. The Pir toxin proteins carried

29

by some strains of Vibrio parahaemolyticus are believed to play essential roles in the

30

pathogenesis of AHPND. However, few studies have so far explored how the host immune

31

system responds to these bacteria. In this study, AHPND V. parahaemolyticus (with Pir)

32

and non-AHPND V. parahaemolyticus (without Pir) were injected into two groups of

33

shrimps, and the hemocytes collected for comparative transcriptomic analyses. A total of

34

1064 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified, of which 910 were

35

up-regulated and 154 were down-regulated. Gene Ontology (GO) annotation and Kyoto

36

Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis showed that many DEGs

37

were involved in a number of biological processes such as cellular process, metabolic

38

process and single-organism process in the AHPND V. parahaemolyticus injected group

39

than the non-AHPND V. parahaemolyticus injected group. Among these, major metabolic

40

processes such as carbohydrate metabolism, lipid metabolism and amino acid metabolism

41

were further identified as the major responsive gene groups. We observed that genes

42

involved in cell growth and anti-apoptosis including src, iap2, cas2, cytochrome P450, gst

43

and cytochrome c oxidase were strongly activated in the AHPND V. parahaemolyticus

44

group than in the non-AHPND V. parahaemolyticus group. Collectively, our results

45

unveiled that shrimp hemocytes respond to AHPND related strain of Vibrio

46

parahaemolyticus infection at the transcriptional level, which is useful in furthering our

47

understanding of AHPND.

48

Keywords: Litopenaeus vannamei; AHPND; Pir toxin; transcriptome; metabolism;

49

anti-apoptosis

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

26

50 51 2

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

1. Introduction

53

The Pacific white leg shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei, is one of the most important shrimp

54

species cultured worldwide and especially in China. According to the annual report of the

55

Food & Agriculture Organization (FAO), a total of 7, 894, 204 metric tons (mt) of shrimp

56

was supplied globally in 2014 with over 4, 303, 204 mt harvested directly from aquaculture

57

facilities [1]. However, the development of the global shrimp industry is saddled with

58

various diseases caused by viruses, bacteria, fungi and protozoa, hence impede the growth

59

of shrimp aquaculture [2].

SC

RI PT

52

60

Acute hepatopancreatic necrosis disease (AHPND), an emerging disease with an initial

62

outbreak in Asia around 2009 as a destructive disease, has caused massive production

63

losses in shrimp aquaculture [3]. The causative agent of AHPND is reported to be a special

64

strain of AHPND Vibrio parahemolyticus, which carries an extrachromosomal plasmid with

65

a region coding toxin genes [4]. These toxin-encoding genes, which are called

66

photorhabdus insect-related (Pir) toxins, are currently not detected in other non-AHPND V.

67

parahemolyticus species. The Pir toxins are binary toxins, designated PirA and PirB, which

68

produce typical symptoms of AHPND, and induce cell death of shrimp hepatopancreas,

69

including massive sloughing of hepatopancreas’s tubule epithelial cells [3, 5-6]. In inducing

70

hepatopancreatic cell death, it is believed that V. parahemolyticus may first attach and

71

colonize the stomach of the shrimp with its peritrichous pili-like structures [7], and then the

72

soluble Pir toxins are released into the hepatopancreas to induce organic necrosis by an

73

unknown mechanism [8]. Following the colonization of the shrimp’s stomach, other

74

opportunistic bacteria can then invade the circulatory system thereby leading to the

75

aggregation of hemocytes in the hepatopancreas [9], hence, triggering the systemic

76

inflammatory response. However, it is still largely unknown about how shrimp immune

77

system especially hemocytes respond to AHPND V. parahaemolyticus infection, which

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

61

3

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 78

might be helpful to explain how these toxins kill the shrimp.

79

To address this issue, shrimps were challenged with normal saline, non-AHPND V.

81

parahaemolyticus and AHPND V. parahaemolyticus respectively in this study. Total RNAs

82

extracted from three independent treated samples per group were pooled, followed by

83

RNA-Seq analysis and the responsive genes compared and analyzed using GO term

84

enrichment and KEGG pathway enrichment. Our results provide a different perspective of

85

the impact of AHPND V. parahaemolyticus on hemocytes, in the pathogenesis of AHPND.

SC

RI PT

80

86

2. Materials and methods

88

2.1. Shrimp culture and pathogen challenge

89

Litopenaeus vannamei (weighing about 10-12g) were purchased from a local shrimp farm

90

(Niutianyang, Shantou, Guangdong, China) and cultured in laboratory tanks filled with

91

aerated seawater at 26°C. Shrimps were acclimatized for 2 days before challenge

92

experiments. Two types of V. parahemolyticus were used in this experiment, i.e., AHPND

93

Vibrio parahaemolyticus (PD-2) and non-AHPND Vibrio parahaemolyticus (BCRC12959)

94

strains, which were kind gifts from Dr. Chu Fang Lo of National Cheng Kung University.

95

The AHPND V. parahaemolyticus strain (denoted VA) was identified as the pathogen

96

responsible for AHPND in shrimp, while the non-AHPND V. parahaemolyticus strain

97

(denoted VN) was used as control. Bacteria at the logarithmic growth phase were cultured

98

in an improved Luria-Bertani media (tryptone: 10g/L, yeast extract: 5g/L, NaCl 30g/L)

99

at 30 °C with shaking at 150 rpm until the OD600 of the culture reached 0.6, counted and

100

diluted to the appropriate CFU with 0.65 % normal saline. Shrimps were randomly grouped

101

into an experimental group and two control groups (30 shrimps per group). For the

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

87

4

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT experimental group, 100 ul of 1.0×105CFU/ml VA was injected via the second abdominal

103

segment of shrimp, while for the controls, 100 ul of 1.0×105CFU/ml VN or 0.65 %

104

normal saline (denoted NS) was injected as above. For mortality analysis, forty shrimps

105

from each group were used and shrimp mortality was recorded at two hours interval till 96

106

hours post injection. Three independent experiments were performed with different batches

107

of shrimps, and the Log-rank (Mantel-Cox) Test method was used to analyze the

108

differences in cumulative mortality between groups. The mortality graphs were plotted

109

using GraphPad Prism (Version 5.01).

SC

RI PT

102

M AN U

110

2.2. RNA extraction and transcriptome sequencing

112

Hemolymph was collected at 24 hours post infection from the pericardial sinus with a

113

sterile needle and syringe into an equal volume of ice-cold anti-coagulant buffer (450 mM

114

NaCl, 10 mM KCl, 10 mM EDTA-Na2, 10 mM HEPES. pH 7.0). The hemocytes were

115

harvested by centrifugation at 800 g for 10 min at 4 °C and then immediately used for total

116

RNA extraction. Total RNA was extracted from hemocytes with mirVana miRNA Isolation

117

Kit (Ambion) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The concentration and purity of

118

total

119

(Nano-drop Technologies, Wilmington, DE). The total RNA integrity was evaluated using

120

an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer system (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, California.) with a

121

RNA integrity number (RIN) > 8.5. Only high quality RNA samples were used for

122

constructing the cDNA libraries.

was

quantified

with

a

NanoDrop

2000

spectrophotometer

AC C

RNA

EP

TE D

111

123 124

To prepare the cDNA libraries for sequencing, total RNA from each sample was diluted to

125

200 ng/µL, and then three independent RNA samples for each treatment were pooled into

126

one. Three RNA pools, i.e., VA, VN and NS, were produced and then sequenced at the 5

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Beijing Genomics Institute (BGI, Wuhan, China). Briefly, mRNA with poly (A) were

128

isolated from the total RNA using oligo (dT) beads, purified, fragmented (100 bp~400 bp)

129

with an ultra-sonicator and reverse transcribed into first strand cDNA using random primers.

130

Subsequently, sequencing adapters were connected to the short fragments, and the resultant

131

cDNA libraries used for paired-end RNA-seq. Assembled sequence data from this article

132

were submitted to GenBank under accession numbers PRJNA385392.

RI PT

127

133

2.3. Assembly and functional annotation

135

Raw reads generated using the Illumina Hiseq 2000 platform were filtered to remove

136

adaptors, sequences with unknown nucleotides larger than 5 %, and low quality reads (more

137

than 20 % Q ≤ 10 bases). Following this, the clean reads were used for de novo assembly to

138

produce unigenes using Trinity software (release-20130225) [10]. Functional assignment of

139

unigenes was carried out by Blastx with the protein databases Nr, Swiss-Prot, KEGG and

140

COG (e-value < 0.00001), and by Blastn with the nucleotide database Nt (e-value <

141

0.00001). Next, Blast2GO software was used to obtain the Gene Ontology (GO)

142

annotations [11]. The number of unigenes annotated based on each database was noted.

TE D

M AN U

SC

134

EP

143

2.4. Expression pattern and clustering of differentially expressed genes (DEGs)

145

For each sample, clean reads were mapped to unigenes using Bowtie2 (v2.2.5) [12], and the

146

expression of unigenes calculated using the Fragments Per kb per Million reads (FPKM)

147

method [13]. The read counts of all comparisons were normalized to the aligned FPKM to

148

obtain the relative expression. To ensure high quality of DEGs, False Discovery Rate (FDR)

149

control method was used, with a smaller FDR indicating a larger difference in expression

150

between two samples. Unigenes with FDR ≤0.001 and |log2Ratio|≥1 were chosen as the

151

DEGs [14].

AC C

144

152 6

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 2.5. GO term and KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of DEGs

154

Using the GO term enrichment and KEGG pathway analysis results, the significant GO

155

terms in DEGs were further enriched using hypergeometric test (p≤0.05) [15]. Significantly

156

enriched metabolic pathways or signal transduction pathways in DEGs with Q≤0.05 were

157

chosen for further analysis. Next, WEGO software was used to obtain GO functional

158

classifications and distribution of the genes [16], while the biological functions of unigenes

159

were analyzed using the online KEGG Automatic Annotation Server (KAAS)

160

(http://www.genome.jp/kegg/kaas/) [17].

SC

RI PT

153

161

2.6. Validation of differentially expression genes by qRT-PCR

163

To validate the transcriptome data, 1 µg of the high quality total RNA samples, extracted

164

using the mirVana

165

reverse-transcribed using the PrimeScript RT Reagent Kit with gDNA Eraser (Takara,

166

Dalian, China), following the manufacturer’s protocol. Six unigenes were selected for

167

validation by qRT-PCR using a LightCycler 480 RT-PCR system (Roche Applied Science,

168

Switzerland) with the following program: one cycle at 95 °C for 10 min and 45 cycles of

169

95 °C for 15 s and 60 °C for 30 s. The qPCR was carried out in triplicate for each sample,

170

and five shrimps were analyzed in each group. The fold changes in gene expression were

171

computed using the relative quantification method and normalized to L. vannamei EF1α

172

expression. The gene specific qRT-PCR primers designed with Primer 5 software are listed

173

in Table S1.

(Ambion, Austin,

TX, USA) was

EP

TE D

miRNA Isolation Kit

AC C

174

M AN U

162

175

2.7. Statistical analyses

176

All data are presented as means ± standard deviation (SD). Data Normality test was

177

checked by the Shapiro-Wilk test. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and a multiple

178

comparison (Tukey) test were used to compare the significant differences with the SPSS 7

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 179

13.0 program (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). P< 0.05 was considered statistically

180

significant.

181

3. Result

183

3.1. VA treated group showed higher mortality than VN treated group

184

To examine which of these bacteria (VA and VN) causes more mortality in shrimp, the

185

same dose (104cfu) of VA and VN was injected into shrimps, with about 40 shrimps per

186

each treatment group. The results showed a cumulative mortality of about 97.5% in VA at

187

96 hours 4 days post infection (hpi), while only 62.5% cumulative mortality was observed

188

in VN at the same time point (Fig 1).

M AN U

189

SC

RI PT

182

3.2. De novo assembly and annotation of Unigenes

191

Three cDNA libraries representing VA, VN and NS groups were constructed. A total of

192

145,161,854 raw reads were generated from these three groups (Table 1). After data

193

cleaning, 45,658 assembled sequences with an average length of 1324 nt were obtained

194

using Trinity (Table 2). The sequence length (nt) ranges from 300 nt to ≥3000 nt with

195

distribution shown in Fig 2. Next, all unigenes were annotated using Blastx to protein

196

databases (Nr, Nt, Swiss-Prot, KEGG, COG and GO) and Blastn to nucleotide databases

197

(Nt), with 26634 unigenes assigned, which represented about 58.33% of the total (Table 3).

EP

AC C

198

TE D

190

199

In the GO term annotation, a total of 11,457 unigenes from the assembly were assigned GO

200

terms of biological process (23 subcategories), cellular component (16 subcategories) and

201

molecular function (17 subcategories). The major GO term subcategories (i.e., representing

202

top 30 % of unigenes) were cellular process, cell, cell part, metabolic process, binding,

203

single-organism process, catalytic activity,organelle, and biological regulation (Fig 3A).

204

Using the COG database to further understand the protein orthologies of the assembled 8

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT unigenes, 11,403 were successfully annotated into 26 specific protein function definitions

206

or orthologous categories (Fig 3B). Among these protein function categories, the largest

207

four were general function prediction only (5753); translation, ribosomal structure and

208

biogenesis (3605); transcription (2684); and replication, recombination and repair (2340).

209

To identify the biological processes by which the annotated unigenes are involved in,

210

KEGG pathway analysis was further carried out. In the KEGG analysis, 18,599 unigenes

211

were annotated into 6 major KEGG pathways, including cellular processes, environmental

212

information processing, genetic information processing, human diseases, metabolism and

213

organismal systems. These annotated unigenes were further divided into 42 level 2

214

subcategories pathways. Except the global map which had no pictorial information, the

215

largest subcategory group, infection diseases (Bacterial), had 2609 annotated genes,

216

followed by signal transduction (2400), immune system (2089) and translation (2060) (Fig

217

3C).

218

Table S2.

SC

M AN U

Apart from these, 299 level 3 KEGG subcategories were annotated and are listed in

TE D

219

RI PT

205

3.3. Classification and analysis of the differentially expressed genes (DEGs)

221

To analyze and characterize the DEGs following the different treatments, a cutoff of

222

FDR (false discovery rate) ≤ 0.05 and log2 Ratio ≥ 1 was used as the threshold for selecting

223

DEGs. Based on this, a large number of genes were observed to be dysregulated in VA

224

group (1988) than in VN group (743) relative to control group (NS), while 1064 genes were

225

differentially expressed between VA group and VN group (Fig. 4A and Table S3-S6). To

226

further analyze the DEGs between the AHPND V. parahaemolyticus and non-AHPND V.

227

parahaemolyticus samples, DEGs were further annotated with GO and KEGG databases. In

228

the GO enrichment analysis, a total of 345 DEGs were successfully enriched in biological

229

process (231), cellular component (154) and molecular function (281) (Fig 4B). For the

AC C

EP

220

9

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT KEGG pathway enrichment analysis, 709 of the DEGs were annotated, relative to all

231

unigenes and between VA and VN (Fig 4C, Table S7). When VA was compared to VN, 20

232

subcategories of the KEGG pathway were enriched with the highly significant biological

233

pathways being carbohydrate metabolism, xenobiotics biodegradation and metabolism,

234

infectious diseases (bacterial), lipid metabolism and amino acid metabolism (Fig 4C (i)).

235

On the other hand, 22 subcategories were enriched with lower but significantly changes in

236

signal transduction, infectious diseases (viral), cancers (specific types), immune system and

237

nervous system (Fig 4C (ii)).

SC

RI PT

230

M AN U

238

3.4. Validation of RNA-seq transcriptome data by qRT-PCR

240

In order to substantiate the transcriptome data as well as better understand the response of

241

shrimp hemocytes to AHPND V. parahaemolyticus and non-AHPND V. parahaemolyticus,

242

validation of the transcriptome data using qRT-PCR was performed. As mentioned above,

243

the AHPND V. parahemolyticus can induced massive sloughing of hepatopancreas tubule

244

epithelial cells [6], therefore to further explore the detailed hemocytes response induced by

245

AHPND V. parahemolyticus, DEGs were categorized with KEGG pathway enrichment

246

analyses in Fig. 4C. We found that the genes involved in cell growth and anti-apoptosis

247

were strongly induced in VA group compared with VN group in the transcriptome (Table

248

S8). Thus, six genes, src, iap2, cas2, cytochrome P450, gst and cytochrome c oxidase, were

249

selected for validation using qPCR (Fig 5). The qPCR results showed a significant

250

up-regulation in the expression of the oncogene src as well as the anti-apoptosis genes iap2

251

and cas2 in VA relative to VN and NS. Similarly, a significant up-regulation was observed

252

in the expression of the oxidoreductase gst, cytochrome P450 and cytochrome c oxidase in

253

VA relative to VN or NS. Thus, the qPCR results were generally consistent with the

254 255

transcriptome data.

AC C

EP

TE D

239

10

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

4. Discussion

257

AHPND has caused severe losses in the shrimp industry in the last couple of years [5]. To

258

curtail this loss, several different control or preventive methods including the use of

259

inactivated bacteria antigen, IgY feed additives, phage therapy and nano-bubble technology

260

[18] have been carried out, but with little or no success. This enigma drove scientist to

261

comprehensively explore this disease. In this study, we have mimicked the late stage of

262

AHPND with intramuscularly injection of two strains of V. parahemolyticus, which allow a

263

direct contact between the bacteria and hemocytes. Following this, a comparative

264

transcriptomic analysis was carried out. Our results revealed that shrimp hemocytes

265

probably had a strong anti-apoptosis response against VA infection.

M AN U

SC

RI PT

256

266

As the most important immunocytes in shrimps, hemocytes are the major guardians against

268

pathogen invasion in the circulatory system [19]. The morphology and function of

269

hemocytes is reported to be affected by various bacteria components, as LPS injection has

270

been shown to cause significant decrease in total hemocyte count (THC) in Penaeus

271

monodon [20]. Similarly, the exotoxin from Clostridium difficile has been reported to

272

induce cytoskeletal reorganization in lepidopteran pests [21]. In the present study, our

273

results have shown that VA could induce stronger responses than VN, as indicated by the

274

higher cumulative mortality (Fig 1) as well as the higher number of differentially expressed

275

genes (DEGs) between different V. parahemolyticus treated hemocytes (Fig 4). To further

276

explore the detail response of the hemocytes, DEGs were categorized using KEGG pathway

277

analysis and revealed that anti-apoptosis-related pathways were more strongly activated in

278

VA. Apoptosis is a genetically programmed cell death mechanism, which could be induced

AC C

EP

TE D

267

11

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT by a wide range of stimuli, via the caspase cascade [22]. Our results suggest that VA could

280

not only induce hepatopancreas necrosis, but also cause hemocytes apoptosis, which greatly

281

impaired shrimp immune system. Thus, some anti-apoptosis genes like the oncogene src

282

kinase, which plays a key role in cell growth, division, migration, and survival signaling

283

pathways [23], were highly expressed in VA than in VN. Our results reveals how

284

hemocytes resist the stress exerted by AHPND V. parahemolyticus challenge in terms of

285

transcriptional response.

SC

RI PT

279

286

In conclusion, this comparative transcriptomic study depicts how shrimp hemocytes

288

respond to AHPND V. parahemolyticus infection. Future studies will explore how the

289

shrimp immune system can be prompted to respond to AHPND strain of bacteria and to

290

eventually find treatment for AHPND.

TE D

291

M AN U

287

Disclosure statement

293

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

294

EP

292

Acknowledgments

296

This work was sponsored by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos.

297

31672689 & 31372558), Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (No.

298

2017A030311032), Shantou University Scientific Research Foundation for Talents (No.

299

NTF16001) and Guangdong SAIL Foundation for Distinguished Scholars (No. 14600703).

AC C

295

12

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 300 301 302

References [1] S. Interpreters, FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations), International Organization 1 (2014) 121-123. [2] S. Thitamadee, A. Prachumwat, J. Srisala, et al., P. Jaroenlak , P. V. Salachan, K.

304

Sritunyalucksana, et al., Review of current disease threats for cultivated penaeid shrimp

305

in Asia, Aquaculture, 452 (2016) 69-87.

RI PT

303

[3] L. Tran, L. Nunan, R.M. Redman, L.L. Mohney, C.R. Pantoja, K. Fitzsimmons, et al.,

307

Determination of the infectious nature of the agent of acute hepatopancreatic necrosis

308

syndrome affecting penaeid shrimp, Dis. Aquat. Organ. 105(1) (2013) 45-55.

SC

306

[4] Y.T. Yang, I.T. Chen, C.T. Lee, C.Y. Chen, S.S. Lin, L.I. Hor, et al., Draft genome

310

sequences of four strains of Vibrio parahaemolyticus, three of which cause early

311

mortality syndrome/acute hepatopancreatic necrosis disease in shrimp in China and

312

Thailand, Genome Announc. 2 (5) (2014) e00816-14.

314

[5] D.V. Lightner, R.M. Redman, C.R. Pantoja, B.L. Noble, L. Tran, Early mortality

TE D

313

M AN U

309

syndrome affects shrimp in Asia, Global Aquaculture Advocate. 15 (1) (2012) 40. [6] C.T. Lee, I.T. Chen, Y.T. Yang, T.P. Ko, Y.T. Huang, J.Y. Huang, et al., The opportunistic

316

marine pathogen Vibrio parahaemolyticus becomes virulent by acquiring a plasmid that

317

expresses a deadly toxin, Proc Natl Acad Sci U. S. A. 112 (34) (2015) 10798-10803.

EP

315

[7] W. Soonthornchai, S. Chaiyapechara, P. Jarayabhand, K. Soderhall, P. Jiravanichpaisal,

319

Interaction of Vibrio spp. with the inner surface of the digestive tract of Penaeus

320

monodon, PLoS ONE. 10 (8) (2015) e0135783.

AC C

318

321

[8] H.C. Lai, T.H. Ng, M. Ando, C.T. Lee, I.T. Chen, J.C. Chuang, et al., Pathogenesis of

322

acute hepatopancreatic necrosis disease (AHPND) in shrimp, Fish Shellfish Immunol. 47

323

(2) (2015) 1006-1014.

324

[9] W. Soonthornchai, S. Chaiyapechara, S. Klinbunga, W. Thongda, S. Tangphatsornruang,

325

T. Yoocha, et al., Differentially expressed transcripts in stomach of Penaeus monodon in 13

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 326

response to AHPND infection, Dev. Comp. Immunol. 65 (2016) 53-63.

327

[10] M.G. Grabherr, B.J. Haas, M. Yassour, J.Z. Levin, D.A. Thompson, I. Amit, et al.,

328

Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-Seq data without a reference genome, Nat.

329

Biotechnol. 29 (7) (2011) 644-652. [11] A. Conesa, S. Gotz, J.M. Garcia-Gomez, J. Terol, M. Talon, M. Robles, Blast2GO: a

331

universal tool for annotation, visualization and analysis in functional genomics research,

332

Bioinformatics. 18 (2005) 3674-3676.

334

[12] B. Langmead, S.L. Salzberg, Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2, Nat. Methods.

SC

333

RI PT

330

9 (4) (2012) 357-359.

[13] A. Mortazavi, B.A. Williams, K. McCue, L. Schaeffer, B. Wold, Mapping and

336

quantifying mammalian transcriptomes by RNA-Seq, Nat. Methods 5 (7) (2008)

337

621-628.

340 341 342 343

false discovery rate controlling procedures, Bioinformatics. 19 (3) (2003) 368-375.

TE D

339

[14] A. Reiner, D. Yekutieli, Y. Benjamini, Identifying differentially expressed genes using

[15] M.D. Young, M.J. Wakefield, G.K. Smyth, A. Oshlack, Gene ontology analysis for RNA-seq: accounting for selection bias, Genome Biol. 11 (2) (2010) R14. [16] J. Ye, L. Fang, H. Zheng, Y. Zhang, J. Chen, Z. Zhang, et al., WEGO: a web tool for

EP

338

M AN U

335

plotting GO annotations, Nucleic Acids Res. 34 (2) (2006) 293-297. [17] Y. Moriya, M. Itoh, S. Okuda, A.C. Yoshizawa, M. Kanehisa, KAAS: an automatic

345

genome annotation and pathway reconstruction server, Nucleic Acids Res. 35 (2) (2007)

346

182-185.

AC C

344

347

[18] I. Hirono, S. Tinwongger, Y. Nochiri, H. Kondo, Latest research on acute

348

hepatopancreatic necrosis disease (AHPND) of penaeid shrimps, Philippines.(2016)

349

3-10.

350

[19] L. Vazquez, J. Alpuche, G. Maldonado, C. Agundis, A. Pereyra-Morales, E. Zenteno,

351

Review: Immunity mechanisms in crustaceans, Innate Immunol. 15 (3) (2009) 179-188. 14

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 352

[20] J.A. Xian, X.X. Zhang, H. Guo, D.M. Wang, A.L. Wang, Cellular responses of the tiger

353

shrimp Penaeus monodon haemocytes after lipopolysaccharide injection, Fish Shellfish

354

Immunol 54 (2016) 385-390. [21] A. Castagnola, S.P. Stock, Common virulence factors and tissue targets of

356

entomopathogenic bacteria for biological control of Lepidopteran Pests, Insects. 5 (1)

357

(2014) 139-166.

360 361

cell survival: a review, Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1813 (1) (2011) 238-259.

[23] R.J. Roskoski, Src protein-tyrosine kinase structure, mechanism, and small molecule inhibitors, Pharmacol Res. 94 (2015) 9-25.

362 363 364

EP AC C

367

TE D

365 366

SC

359

[22] L. Portt, G. Norman, C. Clapp, M. Greenwood, M.T. Greenwood, Anti-apoptosis and

M AN U

358

RI PT

355

15

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Figure legends

369

Fig. 1. Cumulative mortality graphs for VA, VN, and NS injected shrimps. Forty shrimps

370

were injected with VA (AHPND V. parahemolyticus) or VN (non-AHPND V.

371

parahemolyticus), at the same dosage of 104cfu per shrimp or with NS (Sterile normal

372

saline). The mortality tests were carried out in triplicates for each sample. Significant

373

difference is indicated by asterisks, **p < 0.01.

374

Fig. 2. Length distribution of all assembled unigenes.

SC

375

RI PT

368

376

Fig. 3. Functional enrichment of assembled genes. (A) Gene ontology (GO) classifications

378

of non-redundant unigenes. All annotated unigenes were categorized into 3 categories: A:

379

biological process, B: cellular component, C: molecular function. (B) The cluster of

380

orthologous groups (COG) classification of putative proteins. In total, 11,403 unigenes

381

were successfully annotated to 26 categories. (C) The Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and

382

Genomes(KEGG) classification of non-redundant unigenes. In total, 18,599 unigenes were

383

assigned to 6 special KEGG pathways, including Cellular Processes (a), Environmental

384

Information Processing (b), Genetic Information Processing (c), Human Diseases (d),

385

Metabolism (e), Organismal Systems (f).

TE D

EP

AC C

386

M AN U

377

387

Fig. 4. Analysis of differentially expressed genes between VN (non-AHPND V.

388

parahemolyticus) and VA (AHPND V. parahemolyticus) treated groups. (A) Comparison of

389

the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between groups. (B) GO terms functional

390

enrichment analysis for VA and VN. (C) KEGG pathway enrichment analysis and

391

annotation compared between all unigenes and DEGs between VA and VN, (a) KEGG

392

pathway enrichment analysis between VA and VN with percentages higher than all

393

unigenes; (b). KEGG pathway enrichment analysis between VA and VN with percentages 16

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 394

lower than all unigenes.

395

Fig. 5. Validation of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) by qPCR. To validate the

397

RNA-seq data, the relative gene expression levels of 6 selected DEGs were examined by

398

qPCR. EF1a was used as an internal control. Different letters on the graph denotes

399

significant statistical difference (p<0.05).

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

396

17

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 400 401

Table 1. Summary of RNA-seq data for L. vannamei injected with AHPND and

402

non-AHPND V. parahemolyticus Samples

Total Raw Reads

Total Clean Reads

Q20 Percentage

GC Percentage

47,123,094

46,275,446

97.27%

47.52%

VN

47,941,818

47,076,076

97.71%

47.59%

NS

50,096,942

49,084,770

97.77%

47.31%

Total

145,161,854

142,436,292

97.58%

47.47%

RI PT

VA

Abbreviations: NS,normal saline treated group;VA,AHPND V. parahemolyticus treated group;VN,

404

non-AHPND V. parahemolyticus treated group.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

403

18

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 405

Table 2. Summary of De novo assemble of L. vannamei hemocyte transcriptome Sample

Total Number

Total Length (nt)

Mean Length (nt)

N50

VA

53,879

48,513,536

900

2084

VN

53,401

49,225,356

922

2143

NS

53,910

48,998,100

All

45,658

60,455,885

RI PT

406

2131

1324

2574

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

407

909

19

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 408 409

Table 3. Functional annotation of unigenes from L. vannamei hemocytes transcriptome Annotation mode

NR

NT

Swiss-Prot

KEGG

COG

GO

ALL

23,223

14,516

21,041

18,599

11,403

11,457

26,634

50.86%

31.79%

46.08%

40.74%

Number of Unigenes with

Percentage of all assembled unigenes (45,658)

24.97%

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

410

RI PT

hits or assignments

20

25.09%

58.33%

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Fig. 1

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

411

412 21

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Fig. 2

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

413

414 415 22

Fig. 3

417

A.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

416

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

418 23

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

B.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

419

420

24

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

C.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

421

422

25

Fig. 4

424

A.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

423

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

425 26

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

B.

427

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

426

428

27

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

C(i).

430

.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

429

28

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

C (ii).

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

431

432 433 29

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Fig. 5

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

434

435 30

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Research highlights ►

We found 1064 genes differentially expressed between the AHPND and Non-AHPND

V. parahemolyticus infected hemocytes in Litopenaeus vannamei. this, the genes involved in the major metabolism processes, cell growth and

RI PT

► Among

anti-apoptosis were further identified as the major responsive genes in response to the

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

AHPND V. parahemolyticus.