Comparing dioxin-like polychlorinated biphenyls in most consumed fish species of the Caspian Sea

Comparing dioxin-like polychlorinated biphenyls in most consumed fish species of the Caspian Sea

Journal Pre-proof Comparing dioxin-like polychlorinated biphenyls in most consumed fish species of the Caspian Sea Ayub Ebadi Fathabad, Khadijeh Jafar...

3MB Sizes 0 Downloads 35 Views

Journal Pre-proof Comparing dioxin-like polychlorinated biphenyls in most consumed fish species of the Caspian Sea Ayub Ebadi Fathabad, Khadijeh Jafari, Hossein Tajik, Maryam Behmanesh, Nabi Shariatifar, Sepideh Sadat Mirahmadi, Gea Oliveri Conti, Mohammad Miri PII:

S0013-9351(19)30675-9

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2019.108878

Reference:

YENRS 108878

To appear in:

Environmental Research

Received Date: 20 August 2019 Revised Date:

28 October 2019

Accepted Date: 28 October 2019

Please cite this article as: Fathabad, A.E., Jafari, K., Tajik, H., Behmanesh, M., Shariatifar, N., Mirahmadi, S.S., Conti, G.O., Miri, M., Comparing dioxin-like polychlorinated biphenyls in most consumed fish species of the Caspian Sea, Environmental Research (2019), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.envres.2019.108878. This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. © 2019 Published by Elsevier Inc.

Comparing dioxin-like polychlorinated biphenyls in most consumed

1

fish species of the Caspian Sea

2

Ayub Ebadi Fathabad 1, Khadijeh Jafari 2, Hossein Tajik 1, Maryam Behmanesh3, Nabi

3

Shariatifar 4, Sepideh Sadat Mirahmadi 5, Gea Oliveri Conti6, Mohammad Miri 7*

4

1- Department of Food Hygiene and Quality Control, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Urmia University, 5

6

Urmia, Iran.

2- Department of Environmental Health Engineering, Faculty of Health, Hormozgan University of 7 Medical Sciences & Health Services, Bandar Abbas, Iran.

8

3- Nutrition and Food Sciences Research Center, Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, 9

10

Tehran, Iran.

4- Department of Environmental Health Engineering, Faculty of Health, Tehran University of Medical 11

12

Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

5- Department of Food Hygiene and safety, Faculty of Health, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences & 13

14

Health Services, Zanjan, Iran.

6- Environmental and Food Hygiene Laboratory, Department of Medical, Surgical Sciences and 15 Advanced Technologies “G.F. Ingrassia” , University of Catania, Catania, Italy.

16

7- Cellular and Molecular Research Center, Department of Environmental Health, School of Public 17 Health, Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences & Health Services, Sabzevar, Iran.

18 19

Corresponding authors:

20

1- Mohammad Miri. School of Public Health, Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences, PO Box 319, Sabzevar, Iran Email: [email protected], [email protected]

21 22 23

2- Hossein Tajik: Department of Food Hygiene and Quality Control, Faculty of 24 Veterinary Medicine, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran.

1

25

Abstract

26

Among polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), dioxin-like PCBs (DL-PCBs) are of the 27 most concern for human health. In this study, the levels of 12 DL-PCBs congeners 28 were measured in 125 fish samples of the Caspian Sea, Iran. Five fish species 29 (Oncorhynchus mykiss, Vimba vimba, Cyprinus carpio, Rutilus frisii kutum and 30 Chelon saliens) were collected from 5 coastal cities of the Caspian Sea (25 samples 31 per each city). Duncan's multi-scope test was used to compare the mean of DL-PCBs 32 in different fish species and different cities. Probabilistic risk of exposure to DL- 33 PCBs and sensitivity analysis were assessed using Monte Carlo simulation approach. 34 The average (standard deviation) of DL-PCBs in fish samples ranged from 232 (16) 35 to 1156 (14) pg/g lipids. The total maximum concentration was detected in Cyprinus 36 carpio from Bandar Anzali, the minimum in Vimba vimba from Chalos. In all 37 samples, non-carcinogenic risk of exposure to DL-PCBs was in safe level (Hazard 38 Quotient < 1). In contrast, the lifetime cancer risk estimated for Bandar Anzali, 39 Bandar Torkaman, and Rasht exceeded the threshold value of 1×10-6 suggested by 40 United States Environmental Protection Agency. Sensitivity analysis indicated that 41 the concentration of DL-PCBs and exposure frequency were the most effective 42 parameters in increasing carcinogenic risk.

43

Keywords: Polychlorinated Biphenyls, health risk assessment, fish, Caspian Sea

44

45

1. Introduction

46

2

Fish consumption is highly recommended in human diet due to its content of 47 polyunsaturated fatty acids (n-3) (PUFA) that play an important role in the 48 maintenance of human health (Trocino et al., 2012). However, the seafood 49 consumption is the most important source for human exposure to persistent organic 50 pollutants (POPs) and other toxic materials (Dórea, 2008). Moreover, using fish in 51 waters pollution monitoring programs has been widely recommended (Avigliano et 52 al., 2016).

53

The most hazardous groups of POPs include polychlorinated dibenzodioxins 54 (PCDDs), polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDFs) and polychlorinated biphenyls 55 (PCBs) (Fu et al., 2018; Pacheco Ferreira, 2018; USEPA., 2000). PCBs are a group 56 of 209 PCB-congeners with different substitution patterns with high persistence and 57 capable to bioaccumulation. PCBs are classified into two groups: dioxin like-PCBs 58 (DL-PCBs, 12 congeners) and unlike dioxin PCBs or non-dioxin like PCBs (NDL- 59 PCBs) (Fu et al., 2018; Lüth et al., 2018). DL-PCBs include four non-ortho 60 congeners (77, 81, 126, and 169) and eight mono-ortho PCB congeners (Nakatani et 61 al., 2011; Pacheco Ferreira, 2018). Review studies on the topic show the presence of 62 different DL-PCBs congeners in water, soil, air, and wildlife (Salamova et al., 2013). 63 Previous studies reported that DL-PCBs concentration in fish depends on several 64 factors such as: species, environmental conditions (Storelli, 2008), type or origin of 65 feed used in farmed fish (Conti et al., 2015; Trocino et al., 2009), and ecological 66 niche occupied by wild fishes (Custódio et al., 2011).

67

Exposure to DL-PCBs can lead to carcinogenic and immunological effects but also 68 endocrine and fertility dysfunctions (Rizzi et al., 2017).

3

69

Research on Cancer (UNIARC) classified PCB 126 congener as carcinogenic for 70 humans (group 1) (IARC., 2009; Nakatani et al., 2011), but recently, all PCBs (DL- 71 PCBs and NDL-PCBs) have been identified as carcinogenic for humans (Barone et 72 al., 2018; Habibullah-Al-Mamun et al., 2019; IARC, 2016; Lauby-Secretan et al., 73 2013). The Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives, recommends a 74 provisional tolerable monthly intake (PTMI) of 70 pg/kg body weight/month to 75 reduce the human exposure to the DL-PCBs through diet (Cao et al., 2018).

76

So far, several studies focused on the presence of several classes of POPs in fishes 77 caught from the Caspian Sea (Agusa et al., 2004; Anan et al., 2005; Dadar et al., 78 2016; Ebadi and Shokrzadeh, 2006; Hosseini et al., 2008; Kajiwara et al., 2002; 79 Kajiwara et al., 2003; Kajiwara et al., 2008; Katuli et al., 2014; Manavi et al., 2018; 80 Manavi and Mazumder, 2018; Mashroofeh et al., 2013). However, within the group 81 of POPs studies addressing DL-PCBs in fish in this area are missing in literature.

82

The Caspian Sea has a strategic position; it is rich in oil and gas reserves and 83 represents a source of income for commercial fishing and shrimp fishing of 84 neighboring countries. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the level of DL-PCBs 85 in different fish species from different areas of the Caspian Sea, Iran. Also, 86 carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic risk of exposure to these pollutants were assessed 87 as well as sensitivity analyses were carried out using the Monte Carlo simulation 88 technique.

89

2. Material and methods

90

2.1.Sampling location and fish collection

91

4

This study was carried out in March 2018 in five coastal cities (Bandar Anzali, 92 Chalous, Rasht, Astara and Bandar Torkaman) of the Caspian Sea, Iran (Figure 1). 93 The Caspian Sea is in the geographical location of longitude from 48.75° to 53.92° 94 and latitude from 36.46° to 47.10°, with an about 420 000 km2 area.

95

Annually, 600 000 tons of different fish species are caught from this sea and 96 consumed by citizens (Tolosa et al., 2004). In this study, 5 common fish species (5 97 specimens from each species) including Oncorhynchus mykiss, Vimba vimba, 98 Cyprinus carpio, Rutilus frisii kutum, and Chelon saliens were randomly collected 99 from 5 markets for each coastal city included in our study for a total of 125 samples. 100 The selected cities covered all Iranian coastline of the Caspian Sea, and we made 101 sure that the fish specimens were collected from the Caspian Sea. All collected 102 samples were placed in cool boxes and transferred to the laboratory. In the 103 laboratory, biometers of the fishes, i.e., weight and length were recorded (Table S1 of 104 Supplemental materials). 50 g muscle tissue from each fish were sampled, wrapped 105 in aluminum foil and stored at -20°C until analysis. 2.2.Extraction of DL-PCBs

106 107

The initial DL-PCBs extraction was done according to USEPA method 1668 revision 108 A (U.S. EPA, 1999). Briefly, 50 g of fillet was homogenized by a meat grinder 109 (Moulinex, Ecully Cedex, France). The process was repeated three times for each 110 muscle sample. Then, 100 g sodium sulfate anhydrous (Na2SO4, Merck, Germany) 111 was added to each sample and homogenized at 50 °C for six h. Besides, about 50 ng 112 of internal standard PCB 209 (Sigma-Aldrich, Germany) was added to the sample to 113 monitor the PCB extraction and its recovery. The lipid extraction process was carried 114 5

out using Soxhlet Extractor (Soxhlet Extraction System B-811 (Büchi AG, Flawil, 115 Switzerland)). The extractions were performed using a mixture of hexane and 116 acetone (90:10 v/v). The process for each sample was repeated for 260 cycles (Liu et 117 al., 2016; USEPA, 1999). The concentration of lipid was determined gravimetrically. 118 1 g of extracted lipid was dissolved in 10 mL n-hexane, and this diluted extract was 119 used for further analyses. All extracts were purified using silica gel multi-layer 120 absorbent columns (see Figure S1 of Supplemental materials). In this study, the 121 cleanup columns used were similar to the Japanese industrial standard method based 122 on the EPA1613 method (Masunaga et al., 2001). The silicates were initially 123 activated and then dried at 200 °C for 24 h. After that, silica was washed with 60 mL 124 n-hexane to remove contaminants from the silica. To prepare silica gel, the 125 inactivated silica was mixed with sulfuric acid 98% (40% w/w) (Akutsu et al., 2005; 126 USEPA, 1999). The column layers composition for chromatography was similar to 127 those reported by Masunaga et al. (2006) and Aries et al. (2001) (Aries et al., 2006; 128 Masunaga et al., 2001).

129

Briefly, the first layer was a mixture of silica gel (3 g) with silver nitrate (AgNO3, 130 10% w/w, Merck, Germany), which eliminated sulfur compounds from the sample. 131 The next layer was made of silica (6 g) with sulfuric acid (H2SO4, 22%), for the 132 removal of lipid layers and elimination of its oxidation metabolites from the sample. 133 The third layer was constituted by 44% H2SO4, which was used to remove the 134 remaining lipid impurities and hydrolyzed fats in the sample. The fourth layer was 135 made of a mixture of silica gel (3 g) and potassium hydroxide (KOH-2%, Merck, 136 Germany), that eliminated the possible acids and acidic compounds. Finally, The 137

6

DL-PCBs were eluted through the column by 50 mL n-hexane (HPLC grade) and 138 concentrated using a rotary evaporator at 40 °C to reach a final volume of 1 ml for its 139 injection into HRGC/HRMS (Barone et al., 2018; USEPA, 1999). After passing the 140 sample through the column, the column was washed with further solvent (60 mL of 141 n-hexane) to remove the remaining PCBs in the column.

142

2.3.Analysis of DL-PCBs

143

The analyses of DL-PCBs in the fillets samples were done according to USEPA 144 method (USEPA, 1999). The analysis of samples was carried out at the Laboratory of 145 Tehran

University of

Medical

Sciences

using a

High

Resolution

Gas 146

Chromatography (Agilent 6890 Series, Agilent Technologies, USA) coupled with 147 High

Resolution

Mass

Spectrometer

AutoSpec

Ultima

NT–HRGC/HRMS 148

(Micromass, USA), equipped with the HP-5MS 30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 µm column 149 (Agilent Technologies) and helium as carrier gas. In this study 12 congeners of DL- 150 PCBs (PCB 77, PCB 81, PCB 105, PCB 114, PCB118, PCB 123, PCB 126, PCB 151 156, PCB 157, PCB 167, PCB 169 and PCB 189) (more details are described in 152 Table S2 of Supplemental materials) were determined and reported as pg/g fat 153 (Trocino et al., 2009; Van den Berg et al., 2006). The detector calibration (as linear 154 response range) was determined by injecting standard dilutions under actual 155 conditions to HRGC/HRMS. An appropriate amount (from 1 to 10 µL) of the extract 156 was injected to HRGC/HRMS, and the congeners and their concentrations were 157 determined (Akutsu et al., 2005; U.S. EPA, 1999). For all samples, a HRMS single- 158 ion monitoring (SIM) method (>10000 resolution) was applied (Masunaga et al., 159 2001). Two daughters ions (for natural and marked DL-PCBs) were considered to 160

7

determine the best ratio of signal to noise (S/N). The response factors were measured 161 by injecting 1 µL of standard solution into the HRGC/HRMS. Other MS detector 162 condition was 1 mL/min as a flow rate, injector in splitless mode, and injector 163 temperature at 290 ºC. Oven temperature program was 90 ºC (isothermal: 2 min and 164 first rate at 5 ºC/m) to 280 ºC (isothermal: 3min).

165

2.4.Quality control and recovery

166

Quantification of DL-PCBs was done based on multi-level calibration curves, and we 167 found a good linearity (R2 > 0.99) for the standards range which had the same 168 concentrations range of the samples. The standard curve of 10 concentrations of DL- 169 PCBs ranged from 1 to 1000 µg/l (Sigma-Aldrich, Germany). DL-PCBs 170 concentrations were measured based on a peak-by-peak height comparison and a 171 calibration curve of each certified PCB congener. All PCBs had a peak height at the 172 range of calibration curve, and the samples with higher peak were diluted. The 173 efficiency of the residue analysis method used to measure the DL-PCBs in the fish 174 samples was tested based on recovery (%). The mean recoveries were between 98% 175 and 110% for all compounds tested.

176

Blank sample analysis was carried out after injecting every 10 samples to calibrate 177 the system and results indicated that all blank samples showed no detectable 178 concentrations or traces of PCBs (Salihovic et al., 2012).

Limits of quantification 179

(LOQ) for all DL-PCBs ranged between 0.03 to 0.09 pg/g fat. 2.5.Toxic equivalents (TEQs)

180 181

The toxicity level of the DL-PCBs was considered based on the most toxic known 182 between the dioxin compounds, namely 2,3,7,8 tetrachloro-dibenzo-dioxin (TCDD), 183

8

as the toxic scale of 1 for it and the toxicity of other DL-PCBs was compared with it 184 (Table S3 of Supplemental Materials) (Su et al., 2012; Turyk et al., 2006; Xu et al., 185 2006). The total toxic equivalents (TEQs) were calculated as follows (Van den Berg 186 et al., 2006):

187

TEQs = ∑ (Ci × TEFi)

(1)

188

Where Ci is the concentration of DL-PCB congener i; TEFi is the toxic equivalent 189 factor of congener i.

190

2.6.Health Risk Assessment

191

Monte Carlo simulation method was applied to determine the carcinogenic and non- 192 carcinogenic risk caused by exposure to DL-PCBs through the consumption of fish in 193 all cities of the studied area. Sensitivity analysis was done based on effective 194 variables on risk assessment such as concentration (C) of DL-PCBs, exposure 195 frequency (EF), body weight (BW), the averaging time (AT) and the maximum 196 allowable daily consumption of contaminated fish (FCR).

197 198

2.6.1. Estimated daily intake

199

Estimated daily intake (EDI) of DL-PCBs (ng/kg/day) by fish consumption was 200 calculated using the following equation:

EDI =

 ×  ×  ×

201

(2)

×

202

Where, FCR is set to 25.5 g/day for Iranian people (Miri et al., 2017b), BW is set to 203 70 ± 10 kg for Iranian adults (Miri et al., 2017b), EF is based on day/year, which 204 calculated based on the rate of fish consumption for Iranian inhabitants (minimum, 205 9

once per week, on average twice and maximum three meals per week), ED is the 206 exposure duration in terms of years (70 years) and AT is the averaging time in days 207 (AT= EF × ED).

208

2.6.2. Hazard quotient

209

Hazard quotient (HQ) of the non-carcinogenic risk related to the consumption of fish 210 contaminated with DL-PCBs was calculated as follows (Saha et al., 2016):  =



(3)



211

212

RFD is the oral reference dose set to 20 ng/kg/day for PCBs in this study (Quadroni 213 and Bettinetti, 2017).

214

In our study, the effect of cooking on the concentration of DL-PCBs was not 215 considered, and the HQ was calculated based on pollutant concentration in row 216 samples (Saha et al., 2016).

217

2.6.3. Carcinogenic risk

218

The lifetime carcinogenic risk (LTCR) through exposure to DL-PCBs was 219 determined using the cancer slope factor (CSF) (2×10−6 ng/kg/day) provided by the 220 United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) with the following 221 equation (Saha et al., 2016; Shaheen et al., 2016):

 =

 × ×  ×  × ×! "# ×

%$× 10()

222

(4)

223

Where CF is conversion factor (0.001 pg/ng). Other parameters are same as equation 224 2.

225

10

2.7.Statistical analysis

226

Data analysis was carried out using a completely randomized design in a factorial 227 experiment in three replications. Descriptive statistics were analyzed by Stata 228 software version 15 (Stata Corp LP, College Station, Texas). Normality of data was 229 tested based on Shapiro-Wilk. Duncan multi-scope test was used to compare mean of 230 DL-PCBs in different fish species and different cities. A significant level of 0.05 was 231 performed for all analyses. To simulate Monte Carlo technique and perform 232 sensitivity analyses, Crystal Ball software (version 11.1.1.1, Oracle, Lnc. USA) with 233 100 000 trails was used.

234 235

3. Results and discussion

236

3.1.Comparing DL-PCBs concentrations

237

A comparison of ∑DL-PCBs concentration of different fish species and different 238 sampling locations are presented in Table 1. There were significant differences in 239 ∑DL-PCBs concentration of different fish species and sampling location (p≤0.05). 240 The highest ∑DL-PCBs was in Cyprinus carpio species (1156.27 ± 14.55 pg/g fat) in 241 Bandar Anzali. The lowest concentration of ∑DL-PCBs was in Vimba vimba species 242 from Chalous, with a mean concentration of 232.43 ± 16.05 pg/g fat. Due to great 243 variation of PCBs type and number of them which were analyzed in previous studies, 244 as well as due to different measurement units and methods, comparing the results of 245 our study with previous reports is complicated and could not be reasonable (Cao et 246 al., 2018; Mezzetta et al., 2011). For example, in a study by Chao et al. (2018) in the 247 Shadong Sea of China, the average DL-PCBs was 0.887 ng/g wet weight (Cao et al., 248 11

2018). The concentration of measured PCBs in different fish species are shown in 249 Table S4 to S14 and Figure S2 (for PCB77) of Supplemental materials.

250

Overall, the mean concentration of non-ortho PCBs was lower than mono-ortho 251 PCBs. For mono-ortho PCBs, PCB118 (367.50 pg/g fat) had the highest mean 252 concentration in Cyprinus carpio and this our result is consistent with other studies 253 of Zhoushan Fishery and marine fish of Shandong in China, farmed fish, Latvian 254 Lake and fish species of Lake Victoria, Uganda (Cao et al., 2018; Ssebugere et al., 255 2014; Wang et al., 2015; Zacs et al., 2013). Moreover, all the other 7 mono-ortho 256 PCBs were detected in all fish species and Bandar Anzali had the highest mean 257 concentration. The lowest mean concentration of mono-ortho PCBs was that of PCB 258 157 (0.82 pg/g fat) in Vimba vimba from Chalous. Among non-ortho PCBs, the 259 highest mean concentration was that of PCB 77 (29.58 pg/g fat) in Cyprinus carpio 260 from Bandar Anzali. Also, the lowest concentration of non-ortho PCBs was found in 261 Vimba vimba from Chalous for PCB 169 with mean concentration of 0.02 ± 0.03 262 pg/g fat. Considering the different measurement units, both PCB 77 (46.1 pg/g ww) 263 and PCB169 (2.02 pg/g ww) concentrations recorded by Celik Cakirogullari et al. 264 (2010) were higher than this study results (Çelik Çakıroğulları et al., 2010). In the 265 study by Cao et al. (2018) PCB 77 (0.063 ng/g ww) had the highest mean 266 concentration, which is in line with our findings (Cao et al., 2018).

267

The highest concentrations were found in Cyprinus carpio from Bandar Anzali and 268 the lowest in Vimba vimba from Chalous. Previous studies indicated that 269 concentration of DL-PCBs in different fish species was affected by complex factors 270 e.g., geographical origin, environment condition and season. Moreover, fish lipid 271 12

content, living and feeding habits, and low biodegradability of DL-PCB congeners in 272 the aquatic ecosystem (such as Sea) and bioaccumulation capability of these 273 pollutants in organisms are the major reasons of contamination of fish species by 274 DL-PCBs (Blanco et al., 2013; Costopoulou et al., 2016; Jiang et al., 2005a; 275 Mezzetta et al., 2011; Sun et al., 2014). 3.2.TEQs

276

277

The descriptive statistic of calculated TEQs for different studied cities and different 278 fish species are presented in Figure 2. The mean (standard deviation (SD)) of TEQs 279 in Astara, Bandar Anzali, Bandar Torkaman, Chalous and Rasht were 0.60 (0.32), 280 0.82 (0.35), 0.73 (0.31), 0.59 (0.28) and 0.68 (0.29) pgTEQ/g fat respectively. The 281 mean (SD) of TEQs for Rutilus frisii kutum, Oncorhynchus mykiss, Cyprinus carpio, 282 Chelon saliens and Vimba vimba species were 0.90 (0.11), 0.48 (0.11), 1.08 (0.16), 283 0.73 (0.09) and 0.23 (0.08) pgTEQ/g fat, respectively. Our results indicated that the 284 level of DL-PCBs in Cyprinus carpio species was more than other species and the 285 TEQ value for this species was higher than 1. Han et al. (2018) reported that in 286 China, reported that the maximum level of TEQ (higher than 1) was also detected in 287 Cyprinus carpio in China (Han et al., 2018). Moreover, in another study carried out 288 in Italy, similar results have been reported for this fish species (Trocino et al., 2012). 289 Therefore, Cyprinus carpio species should be consumed with caution for sensitive 290 people groups (i.e., children and elderly) in these areas. In our study, the overall 291 mean (SD) of TEQs was 0.68 (0.32) pgTEQ/g fat. Considering differences in TEQs 292 calculation, our values were lower than those reported by Trocino et al. 2012 in Italy 293 for intensive inland basins and intensive sea cages (Trocino et al., 2012). In another 294 13

study by Çelik Çakıroğulları et al. 2010 in Turkey, reported that the actual level of 295 ∑WHO-PCDD/Fs-DL-PCBs-TEQ(TEFs

1998)

was

6.12 ± 0.16 pg/g

fat

(Çelik 296

Çakıroğulları et al., 2010). In the study by Valérie Vrommana et al. in 2012, reported 297 that the mean of TEQs(TEFs 1998) was 2.19 pg WHO-TEF/g fresh weight (Vromman et 298 al., 2012). However in study by Han et al. on the Chinese mitten crabs, the overall 299 mean of TEQ level was 5.7 ± 4.0 pg TEQ/g (Han et al., 2018). In a study by Cao et 300 al., 2018 in China, TEQ(TEFs 2006) value in each fish sample was ranged from 0.011 to 301 9.214 pg WHO-TEQ/g ww (Cao et al., 2018).

302

303

3.3.Health risk assessment

304

In the present study, the health risk of exposure to ∑DL-PCBs was estimated based 305 on mean concentration of these pollutants in different fish species in each Caspian 306 coastal city. The results of the EDI (ng/kg/day) and non-carcinogenic (HQ) risk of 307 exposure to DL-PCBs via fish consumption in different cities are presented in Table 308 2. As shown, the highest mean value of EDI was 3.23E-1 ng/kg/day in fishes from 309 Bandar Anzali, and the lowest EDI value was observed in Chalous fishes with an 310 average of 2.11 E-1 ng/kg/day. The highest mean of HQ was observed in fishes from 311 Bandar Anzali (1.62 E-2); instead the lowest mean of HQ value was in Chalous 312 samples (1.06 E -2). According to the results, in all cities, the HQ was less than 1, 313 indicating that the mean concentration of ∑DL-PCBs in different studied areas were 314 at a safe level. Zhao et al. (2012) reported that HQs that HQ related to exposure to 315 DL-PCBs in both low and high fish consumption groups in China were in safe level 316 (Zhao et al., 2012). Similar results were reported by Jiang et al. (2005b) (Jiang et al., 317 14

2005b). Previous studies in Iran, reported that the non-carcinogenic risk for several 318 heavy metals via fish consumption were in safe level (HQ<1), which is consistent 319 with the present study (Ebadi Fathabad et al., 2019; Miri et al., 2017a). While, in a 320 study by Ebadi Fathabad et al., 2018, in Tehran's market, reported that, the HQ for 321 heavy metals in various types of natural juices and canned foods was higher than safe 322 level (Fathabad et al., 2018).

323

The results of lifetime carcinogenic risk (LTCR) of exposure to ∑DL-PCBs via 324 consumption of fish in different parts of the studied area are presented in Figure 3. 325 As shown, the 95th percentile value for LTCR for Bandar Anzali, Bandar Torkaman 326 and Rasht exceeded the threshold value of 1.00 E-6 suggested by USEPA (EPA, 327 2001). The highest mean value of LTCR was observed in Bandar Anzali (6.46 E-7), 328 and the lowest LTCR was observed in Chalous (4.23 E-7). Xia et al. (2012) reported 329 that LTCR in all low and high fish consumption groups was higher than safe level 330 (Xia et al., 2012). Otherwise, previous studies carried out in Iran showed also 331 indicated that the carcinogenic risk of exposure to heavy metals via consumption of 332 fish is at a safe level (Fathabad et al., 2018; Miri et al., 2017a).

333

In this study, sensitivity analysis was performed to determine the most effective 334 variable in increasing the carcinogenic risk through DL-PCBs using Monte Carlo 335 simulations. Figure 4 indicates sensitivity analyses of LTCR for exposure to ∑DL- 336 PCBs in different coastal cities. According to Figure 4, the concentration of DL- 337 PCBs (C) was the most effective variable in increasing the carcinogenic risk 338 (contribution to variance ranged from 39.4 to 50.9 %). The other effective parameters 339 in increasing the health risk for consumers was exposure frequency (EF) and per 340 15

capita fish consumption (FCR), respectively. Increased body weight (BW) and 341 averaging time (AT) of exposure (day) had an inverse relationship with carcinogenic 342 risk (contribution to variance ranged from -8.7 to -10.9 % and -18 to -23.9% 343 respectively). Previous studies indicated that the concentration of the pollutant was 344 an effective factor in increasing the health risk, which is consistent with the results of 345 this study (Fallahzadeh et al., 2018; Miri et al., 2018).

346 347

4- Conclusion

348

The average TEQs of DL-PCBs in fish samples from the Iranian coastline of Caspian 349 Sea was lower than previous reports. The highest level of DL-PCBs was observed in 350 Cyprinus carpio from Bandar Anzali, and the lowest levels of DL-PCBs were related 351 to Vimba vimba from Chalous. The results of the health risk assessment indicated 352 that carcinogenic risks of exposure to ∑DL-PCBs via consumption of fish in Bandar 353 Anzali, Bandar Torkaman, and Rasht were higher than the safe level. The sensitivity 354 analysis indicated, C and EF as the most effective parameters in increasing the health 355 risk. The DL-PCBs in fish samples of different studied areas should be monitored 356 continuously in the future. More attention is needed to protect the marine 357 environment by the authorities and decision-makers to prevent seawater 358 contaminations. Further studies, on the other fish species and more frequent sampling 359 in different seasons, are recommended to find out the reliability of the results of this 360 study.

361

362

Acknowledgment

363 16

The authors thank from Urmia University and Tehran University of Medical 364 Sciences. Mohammad Miri is supported by the Sabzevar University of Medical 365 Sciences.

366 367 368 369 370

References Agusa, T., et al., 2004. Concentrations of trace elements in muscle of sturgeons in the Caspian Sea. Marine pollution bulletin. 49, 789-800. Akutsu, K., et al., 2005. Congener-specific analysis of PCBs in food samples by using GC/MS. Shokuhin eiseigaku zasshi. Journal of the Food Hygienic Society of Japan. 46, 99-108. Anan, Y., et al., 2005. Trace element accumulation in fishes collected from coastal waters of the Caspian Sea. Marine pollution bulletin. 51, 882-888. Aries, E., et al., The Supelco “dioxin prep system-florisil version”: a multi-layer silica gel column connected in series to an activated florisil micro-column for rapid determinations of PCDD/Fs and PCBs in environmental samples. 3rd National Meeting on Environmental Mass Spectrometry.—2006, .2006 Avigliano, E., et al., 2016. Toxic element determination in fish from Parana River Delta (Argentina) by neutron activation analysis: tissue distribution and accumulation and health risk assessment by direct consumption. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis. 54, 27-36. Barone, G., et al., 2018. PCBs and PCDD/Fs in Bluefin Tuna: Occurrence and Dietary Intake. International journal of environmental research and public health. 15, 911. Blanco, L., et al., 2013. Polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans (PCDD/Fs) and dioxin-like polychlorinated biphenyls (dl-PCBs) in fish, seafood products and fish oil in Spain. Food Additives & Contaminants: Part B. 6, 218-230. Cao, Y., et al., 2018. Dioxin-like polychlorinated biphenyls in marine fish from Shandong, China, and human dietary exposure. Food Additives & Contaminants: Part B. 11, 229-236. Çelik Çakıroğulları, G., et al., 2010. Levels of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins, dibenzo-pfurans and polychlorinated biphenyls in farmed sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) and sea bream (Sparus aurata) from Turkey. Food Control. 21, 1245-1249. Conti, G. O., et al., 2015. Determination of illegal antimicrobials in aquaculture feed and fish: an ELISA study. Food Control. 50, 937-941. Costopoulou, D., et al., .2016PCDDs, PCDFs and PCBs in farmed fish produced in Greece: levels and human population exposure assessment. Chemosphere. 146, 511-518. Custódio, P. J., et al., 2011. Comparative study of elemental content in farmed and wild life Sea Bass and Gilthead Bream from four different sites by FAAS and EDXRF. Food chemistry. 124, 367-372. Dadar, M., et al., 2016. A comparative study of trace metals in male and female Caspian kutum (Rutilus frisii kutum) from the southern basin of Caspian Sea. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 23, 24540-24546. Dórea, J. G., 2008. Persistent, bioaccumulative and toxic substances in fish: human health considerations. Science of the Total Environment. 400, 93-114. 17

371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406

Ebadi, A., Shokrzadeh, M., 2006. A survey and measurement of residues of lindane (organochlorine pesticides) in four species of the most consumed fish in the Caspian Sea (Iran). Toxicology and industrial health. 22, 53-58. Ebadi Fathabad, A., et al., 2019. Heavy Metal Concentration and Health Risk Assessment of Some Species of Fish, Rasht, Iran. Journal of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences. 28, 118-132. EPA, U. J. P. R. D., OSWER, 2001. Supplemental guidance for developing soil screening levels for superfund sites. 9355, 4-24. Fallahzadeh, R. A., et al., 2018. Spatial variation and probabilistic risk assessment of exposure to fluoride in drinking water. Food and Chemical Toxicology. 113, 314-321. Fathabad, A. E., et al., 2018. Determination of heavy metal content of processed fruit products from Tehran's market using ICP-OES: a risk assessment study. Food and Chemical Toxicology. 115, 436-446. Fu, L., et al., 2018. Bioaccumulation and human health risks of OCPs and PCBs in freshwater products of Northeast China. Environmental Pollution. 242, 1527-1534. Habibullah-Al-Mamun, M., et al., 2019. Occurrence, distribution and possible sources of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in the surface water from the Bay of Bengal coast of Bangladesh. Ecotoxicology and environmental safety. 167, 450-458. Han, Y., et al., 2018. Sources of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans, and biphenyls in Chinese mitten crabs. Chemosphere. 196, 522-530. Hosseini, S. V., et al., 2008. Contamination by organochlorine compounds in the edible tissue of four sturgeon species from the Caspian Sea (Iran). Chemosphere. 73, 972-979. IARC, 2016. Polychlorinated Biphenyls and Polybrominated Biphenyls: IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. World Health Organization. IARC., I. A. f. R. o. C., 2009. EPA’s Reanalysis of Key Issues Related to Dioxin Toxicity

407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431

and Response to NAS Comments; IARC Monographs on The Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans:

432 433

Lyon, France. 100F, pp. 1–690. ISBN 9789283213239. Jiang, Q., et al., 2005a. Human health risk assessment of organochlorines associated with fish consumption in a coastal city in China. Environmental pollution. 136, 155-165. Jiang, Q. T., et al., 2005b. Human health risk assessment of organochlorines associated with fish consumption in a coastal city in China. Environ Pollut. 136, 155-65. Kajiwara, N., et al., 2002. Organochlorine and organotin compounds in Caspian seals (Phoca caspica) collected during an unusual mortality event in the Caspian Sea in 2000. Environmental Pollution. 117, 391-402. Kajiwara, N., et al., 2003. Contamination by organochlorine compounds in sturgeons from Caspian Sea during 2001 and 2002. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 46, 741-747. Kajiwara, N., et al., 2008. Persistent organic pollutants (POPs) in Caspian seals of unusual mortality event during 2000 and 2001. Environmental Pollution. 152, 431-442. Katuli, K. K., et al., 2014. Impact of a short-term diazinon exposure on the osmoregulation potentiality of Caspian roach (Rutilus rutilus) fingerlings. Chemosphere. 108, 396-404. Lauby-Secretan, B., et al., 2013. Carcinogenicity of polychlorinated biphenyls and polybrominated biphenyls. The lancet oncology. 14, 287-288. Liu, H., et al., 2016. Developmental toxicity, oxidative stress, and related gene expression induced by dioxin‐like PCB 126 in zebrafish (D anio rerio). Environmental toxicology. 31, 295-303. Lüth, A., et al., 2018. Studies on the influence of sampling on the levels of dioxins and PCB in fish. Chemosphere. 212, 1133-1141.

434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454

18

Manavi, P. N., et al., 2018. Organochlorine pesticides in two fish species from the southern Caspian Sea. Marine pollution bulletin. 133, 289-293. Manavi, P. N., Mazumder, A., 2018. Potential risk of mercury to human health in three species of fish from the southern Caspian Sea. Marine pollution bulletin.5-1 ,130 . Mashroofeh, A., et al., 2013. Bioaccumulation of Cd, Pb and Zn in the edible and inedible tissues of three sturgeon species in the Iranian coastline of the Caspian Sea. Chemosphere. 90, 573-580. Masunaga, S., et al., 2001. Dioxin and dioxin-like PCB impurities in some Japanese agrochemical formulations. Chemosphere. 44, 873-885. Mezzetta, S., et al., 2011. Concentration of DL-PCBs in fish from market of Parma city (north Italy): estimated human intake. Chemosphere. 82, 1293-1300. Miri, M., et al., 2017a. Health risk assessment of heavy metal intake due to fish consumption in the Sistan region, Iran. Environmental monitoring and assessment. 189, 583. Miri, M., et al., 2017b. Health risk assessment of heavy metal intake due to fish consumption in the Sistan region, Iran. Environ Monit Assess. 189, 583. Miri, M., et al., 2018. Probabilistic risk assessment of exposure to fluoride in most consumed brands of tea in the Middle East. Food and Chemical Toxicology. 115, 267-272. Nakatani, T., et al., 2 .011A survey of dietary intake of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins, polychlorinated dibenzofurans, and dioxin-like coplanar polychlorinated biphenyls from food during 2000–2002 in Osaka City, Japan. Archives of environmental contamination and toxicology.555-543 ,60 . Pacheco Ferreira, A., 2018. Occurrence of Organochlorines Contaminants in Coastal Fish from Sepetiba Bay: Levels and Human Health Repercussions. Journal of Chemical Health Risks. 3. Quadroni, S., Bettinetti, R., 2017. Health risk assessment for the consumption of fresh and preserved fish (Alosa agone) from Lago di Como (Northern Italy). Environ Res. 156, 571-578. Rizzi, J., et al., 2017. Characterization of quality of sediments from Paranaguá Bay (Brazil) by combined in vitro bioassays and chemical analyses. Environmental toxicology and chemistry. 36, 1811-1819. Saha, N., et al., 2016. Seasonal investigation of heavy metals in marine fishes captured from the Bay of Bengal and the implications for human health risk assessment. Food Control. ,70 .118-110 Salamova, A., et al., 2013. Post-1990 temporal trends of PCBs and organochlorine pesticides in the atmosphere and in fish from Lakes Erie, Michigan, and Superior. Environmental science & technology. 47, 9109-9114. Salihovic, S., et al., 2012. A rapid method for screening of the Stockholm Convention POPs in small amounts of human plasma using SPE and HRGC/HRMS. Chemosphere. 86, 74753. Shaheen, N., et al., 2016. Presence of heavy metals in fruits and vegetables: Health risk implications in Bangladesh. Chemosphere. 152, 431-438. Ssebugere, P., et al., 2014. Polychlorinated biphenyls in sediments and fish species from the Murchison Bay of Lake Victoria, Uganda. Science of the Total Environment. 482, 349357. Storelli, M., 2008. Potential human health risks from metals (Hg, Cd, and Pb) and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) via seafood consumption: estimation of target hazard quotients (THQs) and toxic equivalents (TEQs). Food and Chemical Toxicology. 46, 2782-2788. Su, G., et al., 2012. Dietary intake of polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) from fish and meat by residents of Nanjing, China. Environment international. 42, 138-143.

19

455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504

Sun, Y.-X., et al., 2014. Persistent organic pollutants in marine fish from Yongxing Island, South China Sea: levels, composition profiles and human dietary exposure assessment. Chemosphere. 98, 84-90. Tolosa, I., et al., 2004. Aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbons in coastal Caspian Sea sediments. 48, 44-60. Trocino, A., et al., 2009. PCBs contamination in farmed European sea bass from different Italian rearing systems. Chemosphere. 76, 250-254. Trocino, A., et al., 2012. Levels of dioxin-like polychlorinated biphenyls (DL-PCBs) and metals in European sea bass from fish farms in Italy .Food chemistry. 134, 333-338. Turyk, M., et al., 2006. Relationship of serum levels of individual PCB, dioxin, and furan congeners and DDE with Great Lakes sport-caught fish consumption. Environmental research. 100, 173-183. U.S. EPA, E. P. A., 1999. Method 1668, revision A: Chlorinated biphenyl congeners in water, soil, sediment, and tissue by HRGC/HRMS. EPA No. EPA-821-R-00-002. USEPA, 1999. Method 1668, Revision A: Chlorinated biphenyl congeners in water, soil, sediment, and tissue by HRGC/HRMS. USEPA., U. S. E. P. A., 2000. Guidance for Assessing Chemical Contaminant Data for Use in Fish Advisories. https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi/20003P11.PDF?Dockey¼20003P11.PDF. Van den Berg, M., et al., 2006. The 2005 World Health Organization reevaluation of human and mammalian toxic equivalency factors for dioxins and dioxin-like compounds. 93, 223241. Vromman, V., et al., 2012. Evaluation of the use of CALUX results for dioxins and dioxin-like PCBs analysis for quantitative human exposure assessments. Food Control. 27, 314-321. Wang, X., et al., 2015. Assessment on dioxin-like compounds intake from various marine fish from Zhoushan Fishery, China. Chemosphere. 118, 163-169. Xia, C., et al., 2012. Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in marine fishes from China: levels, distribution and risk assessment. Chemosphere. 89, 944-9. Xu, Y., et al., 2006. Effects of PCBs and MeSO2–PCBs on adrenocortical steroidogenesis in H295R human adrenocortical carcinoma cells. Chemosphere. 63, 772-784. Zacs, D., et al., 2013. Content of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins, dibenzofurans and dioxinlike polychlorinated biphenyls in fish from Latvian lakes. Chemosphere. 91, 179-186. Zhao, H., et al., 2012. Human health risk from soil heavy metal contamination under different land uses near Dabaoshan Mine, Southern China. Science of the Total Environment. 417, 45-54.

505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540

541

542

543

544

20

545

546

547

Figure captions

548

Figure 1. Geographical location of the Caspian Sea and studied cities.

549

Figure 2. Calculated toxic equivalents (TEQs) of ∑DL-PCBs based on studied 550 cities and fish species.

551

Figure 3. Lifetime carcinogenic risk (LTCR) for intake ∑DL-PCBs via

552

consuming fish in different studied cities.

553

Figure 4. Sensitivity analyses for lifetime carcinogenic risk of exposure to DL- 554 PCBs via consumption of different fishes in different cities (C: concentration of 555 DL-PCBs; EF: exposure frequency, AT: averaging time in days, BW: body 556 weight; FCR: fish consumption rate).

21

557

Table 1. Comparison of ∑DL-PCBs concentration (pg/g fat) in different fish species and different cities

Fish species/City

Bandar Torkaman

Chalous

Rasht

Bandar Anzali

Astara

Rutilus frisii kutum

923.34 ± 20.48 Bb

688.92 ± 11.85 Eb

842.31 ± 7.28 Cb

986.41 ± 10.70 Ab

783.22 ± 11.17 Db

Chelon saliens

836.74 ± 17.73 Bc

586.10 ± 11.36 Ec

746.11 ± 18.28 Cc

884.04 ± 12.91 Ac

710.37 ± 19.78 Dc

Cyprinus carpioio

1033.60 ± 17.89 Ba

799.51 ± 10.98 Ea

945.32 ± 16.15 Ce

1156.27 ± 14.55

857.96 ± 14.79 Da

Vimba vimba

407.76 ± 17.75 Be

232.43 ± 16.05 Ee

366.27 ± 15.73 Ce

462.64 ± 17.26 Ae

313.69 ± 12.42 De

Oncorhynchus

671.84 ± 25.70 Bd

438.33 ± 18.31 Ed

580.36 ± 15.66 Cd

714.44 ± 12.95 Ad

509.59 ± 49.75 Dd

mykiss *The different small letters indicate a significant difference in the columns and different large letters in the row indicating a significant difference in the row (p≤0.05).

22

Table 2. Estimated daily intake (EDI) and hazard quotient (HQ) for exposure to DL-PCBs via consumption of fish in different cities Percentile 5th

Mean

Median

Standard deviation

Percentile 95th

EDI

1.02 E-1

2.46 E -1

2.21 E-1

1.18 E -1

4.74 E-1

HQ

5.11 E -3

1.23 E -2

1.11 E -2

5.91 E -3

2.37 E -2

EDI

1.43E-1

3.23E-1

2.94E-1

1.48E-1

6.01E-1

HQ

7.14 E -3

1.62 E -2

1.47 E -2

7.38 E -3

3.00 E -2

EDI

1.30E-1

2.95E-1

2.66E-1

1.35E-1

5.49E-1

HQ

6.52E-3

1.48E-2

1.34E-2

6.67E-3

2.74E-2

EDI

8.26E-2

2.11E-1

1.87E-1

1.11E-1

4.21E-1

HQ

4.13E-3

1.06E-2

9.35E-3

5.54E-3

2.10E-2

EDI

1.15E-1

2.68E-1

2.43E-1

1.25E-1

5.10E-1

HQ

5.77E-3

1.34E-2

1.21E-2

6.27E-3

2.55E-2

Cities Astara

Bandar Anzali

Bandar Torkaman

Chalous

Rasht

23

Highlights •

DL-PCBs concentrations in five fish species of the Caspian Sea were investigated.



The highest DL-PCBs concentration was observed in Cyprinus carpio species.



LTCR for Bandar Anzali, Bandar Torkaman, and Rasht exceeded the threshold value suggested by USEPA (1×10-6).

Declaration of interests ☒ The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. ☐The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: