Composition vs catalytic properties of M(CO)3X2L2 (M = Mo or W; X = Cl, Br or I; L = PPh3, AsPh3 or SbPh3) initiators in romp of norbornene

Composition vs catalytic properties of M(CO)3X2L2 (M = Mo or W; X = Cl, Br or I; L = PPh3, AsPh3 or SbPh3) initiators in romp of norbornene

JOURNAL OF MO ECULAR CAf ALYSIS A:CHEMlCAL ELSEVIER Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical 1 I5 (1997) 193-197 Composition vs catalytic prop...

430KB Sizes 1 Downloads 44 Views

JOURNAL OF MO ECULAR CAf ALYSIS A:CHEMlCAL

ELSEVIER

Journal of Molecular

Catalysis

A: Chemical

1 I5 (1997) 193-197

Composition vs catalytic properties of M( CO! ,X,L, ( M = MO or W; X = Cl, Br or I; L = PPh,, AsPh 3 or SbPh 3) initiators in romp of norbomene Lajos Bencze a3*, Ghbor Szalai a, J.G. Hamilton b, J.J. Rooney

b

’ Department ofOrganic Chemistry, (/nicersin: of Veszpre’m, P.O. Box 158, Veszp&m H-820, HungaT b The Queen’s Uniuersity of Belfast, Department of Chemistry (Pi, Belfast, BT9 5A. UK

Abstract Br or I; L= PPh,, AsPh, or SbPh,) Catalytic properties of 18 air stable M(CO),X,L, (M = M o or W; X=CI, one-component initiators were screened in ring-opening metathesis polymerisation (ROMP) of norbornene. The rate of the polymerization, (VP>, varied between 7.8-32.9 mol dm-’ h- ’ in the case of the tungsten containing initiators, with l/PPh, and Br/AsPh, ligand combinations representing the two extremes respectively. The cis/truns double bonds form at about equal probability ((TC= 0.52). The presence of L = AsPh, as a ligand seems to favour higher activity, higher cis selectivity and moderate blockiness. The higher cis selectivity of the tungsten complexes (a, = 0.56-0.58) induced by the I ligand is associated with significantly diminished activity. The activity of the more trans directing (a, = 0.38) molybdenum catalysts was about two orders of magnitude smaller (VP = 0.003-2.50 moldm-’ h- ‘> increasing in the order, L = PPh,, AsPh,, SbPh,, while the cis content and the blockiness of the polymer follow a reverse tendency. Keywords: Activity

Tungsten-carbonyl-halides;

Molybdenum-carbonyl-halides;

1. Introduction

author.

1381-l 169/97/$17.00 Copyright PII Sl38lL1169(96)OOlOl-X

Olefin

metathesis;

Norbornene;

Catalysis:

Selectivity;

2. They are readily available and widely vari-

Thermally activated W(CO),Cl,L, (L = PPh,, AsPh,) are known as unicomponent initiators in the ring-opening metathesis polymerization (ROMP) of strained cycloolefins (norbornene and norbornadiene) and their cross-metathesis with linear alkenes in bulk or in solution [ 11. These catalysts deserve more attention for several reasons: 1. The initiator complexes are air stable;

* Corresponding

ROMP;

0 1997 Published

able; The solutions of the living carbene catalyst ’ are easily generated without the application of any organometallic cocatalysts; 4. The catalyst may be stored and applied as a stock solution; 5. The catalyst is rather tolerant to air and protic agents; 6. The activity may be enhanced by the addition of inorganic Lewis acids; 7. The metathesis reactions may quenched with organic carbonyl compounds. 3

by Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

L. Bencze et al/Journal

194

of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical 11.5 (1997) 193-197

The aim of this work is to study systematically the change in the catalytic properties of the various metal complexes in the model ROMP of norbomene reaction as a function of the central metal atom, the halides and the donor ligands within the general initiator

used for initiation were identified by their IR spectra (Table 1). All experiments were conducted under deoxygenated argon, Benzene and norbornene were distilled from sodium/benzophenone before use. ROMP experiments were carried out in a reaction mixture composed of benzene, norbornene (0.2 moldm-3) and M(CO),X,L, (NBE/W 100 + 3). The reaction mixture was immersed in an oil bath heated to 80°C and stirred by a magnetic stirrer. The reaction was quenched by the addition of ethanol when gelation became apparent or continued until acceptable quantity of product formed. The polymer was precipitated, washed in ethanol, dried and weighed, Yield (%) is defined by comparing the polymer weight to the weight of the norbornene

M(CO)J,L,.

2. Experimental M(CO),X,L2 (M = MO or W; X = Cl, Br or I; L = PPh,, AsPh, or SbPh,) complexes were prepared by halogenation of the corresponding M(CO), complexes and the subsequent substitution of the resulting M(CO),X, intermediates in acetone solution by L as described by Colton [2-71 and Backer et al. [8,9]. The complexes

Table 1 Carbonyl

stretching

frequencies

(vco)

at M(CO),X,L,

complexes

’1

p,o(cm-

Complex

Medium

vco (cm-

W(CO),(PPh,),Cl, W(COI,(AsPh,),Cl, W(CO),(SbPh,),Cl, W(CO),(PPh,),Br,

CH@, CH,Cl, CH,CI, CH,Cl, nujol CH,Cl, nujol CH,Cl, nujol CH,CI, CH,CI, CHCl s CH,CI, CHCI, CH,Cl, CH,Cl, nujol CH,Cl, nujol

2023 2024 2020 2022 2011 2033 2013 2019 2010 2016 2017 2018 2017 2018 2022 2032 2018 2029 2018

1944 1946 1943 1946 1936 1950 1938 1945 1938 1943 1943 1943 1945 1943 1954 1965 1952 1963 1952

1909 1910 1907 1912 1897 1911 1900 1911 1902 1926 1914 1910 1912 1910 1904 1921 1907 1922 1908

1959 1960 1957 1960 1948 1965 1950 1958 1950 1962 1958 1957 1958 1957 1960 1973 1959 1971 1959

CH,CI, nujol CH,CI, nujol CH,CI, CH,CI,

2029 2020 2028 2017 2015 2024

1966 1956 1962 1954 1944 1963

1926 1912 1921 1911 1903 1927

1974 1963 1970 1961 1954 1971

CH,Cl,

2024

1960

1922

1969

W(CO),(AsPh,),Br, W(CO),(SbPh,),Br, W(CO),(PPh,),I, W(CO),(AsPh,),I, W(CO)&bPh,),I, MdCO),@‘h,),CI, Mo(CO),(AsPh,),Cl, Mo(CO),(SbPh,),Cl, Mo(CO),(PPhs),Br,

Mo(COl,(AsPh,),Br, Mo(CO),(SbPh,),Br, Mo(CO),(PPh,),I, Mo(CO),(AsPh,), Mo(CO)s(SbPh,),I,

I,

‘1

I_. Bencze et al. /Journal

J ppm

134.0

132.0

133.0

Fig. 1. Assignment

vu--I--

U

40

data of polymers

36

made by ROMP of norbomene

using M(CO),X2Lj/NBE/benzene

?’

v,

a,

rc

r1

W(CO),(PPh,),Cl, W(CO),(AsPh,)2Cl, W(CO),(SbPh,),C12 W(CO),(PPh,),Br2 W(CO),(AsPhJ2Br, W(CO),(SbPh,&Br, W(CO),(PPh,),12 W(CO)&AsPh,),12 W(CO),(SbPh,)212 Mo(CO),(PPh,)&I, Mo(CO),(AsPh,),CI, Mo(CO),(SbPh,),Cl, Mo(CO),(PPh,),Br, Mo(CO),(AsPh,),Brz Mo(CO),(SbPh,),Brz Mo(CO),(PPh,),I, Mo(CO),(AsPh&Iz Mo(CO),(SbPh,J21,

38 58 49 58 56 47 14 34 19 63 ’ 19 h 45 b ::

21.1 32.9 27.2 32.9 31.1 26.1 7.8 18.9 10.6 0.42 1.06 2.50 0.003 0.38 1.83 0.04 0.56 0.94

0.42 0.55 0.51 0.40 0.56 0.53 0.56 0.58 0.56 0.68 0.33 0.30 0.35 0.26 0.27 0.42 0.30 0.26

1.30 2.06 I .82 I .46 2.07 2.01 2.62 2.37 2.07 7.64 0.62 0.47 I .03 0.50 0.46 1.19 0.58 0.12

2.82 1.75 1.85 3.21 1.31 1.73 2.12 1.85 I .29 I .78 2.50 2.84 2.61 3.00 3.04 2.49 3.78 6.18

b a b b

6

recorded in CDCl, solution at 125 MHz using a GE, GN Omega500 spectrometer. The assignments of 13C NMR shifts based on previous analysis [lo-131 were made as shown in Fig. 1. The microstructural details of the polymers were calculated from the NMR integrals [ 10-131.

Precursor

33 13 10 17

32

of the “C NMR chemical shifts.

used. Reproducibility was tested in three independent runs using W(CO),Cl,(AsPh,), catalyst. The yields varied within + 0.5%. An ‘average reaction rate’ (VP, moldme h-‘) for the comparison of the different initiators is defined. 13C{‘H] NMR spectra of the polymers were

Table 2 Yield, reaction rate and stereochemical

19s

of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical Il.5 f 19971 193-I Y7

systems

3.67 3.23 3.37 4.87 2.71 3.48 5.55 4.38 2.61

13.60 I .55 1.33 2.75

I.50 I .40 2.96 2.18 4.45

Reaction time 0.67 h; a reaction time 100 h; b reaction time 6 h; yield (y) = 100% X {(mol of polymerised NBE) X (mol of NBE)- ’] [%I; average reaction rate (u,) = (lo-’ X yield) X (volume)-’ X (reaction time)-’ [moldm-‘h’1;stereochemical parameters (a, , rc. r,, rcrt) were calculated as described in Ref. [lo].

L. Bencze et al./ Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical 115 (1997) 193-197

196

3. Results and discussion

double formation (a, = 0.38), while the tungsten derivatives form the cis/ trans isomers with nearly equal probability Gc = 0.52) allied with higher blockiness (Fig. 2). A change from tram to cis selectivity has also been noted when the S&rock initiator as precursor ligand OC(CH,), is changed to a harder analog, OC(CF,),. The low c/t selectivity for the tungsten complexes is consisted with their much higher reactivity, indicating less discriminating propagating species. Some trends may be recognized as a function of the ligands: 1. In the order of L = PPh,, AsPh,, SbPh, the reaction rate is increasing and the cis content of the polymers is decreasing in the case of the molybdenum initiators. 2. The cis selectivity and the catalytic activity of the tungsten complexes are highest for the AsPh 3 ligand. 3. The higher cis selectivity (a, = 0.56-0.58) of the tungsten complexes provided by the I ligand is associated with significantly diminished activity. This is attributed to the relatively high bulkiness of the I ligand. Correlation between the Zoo of the precursors with catalytic characteristics (VP, o-,,) were

The results of the ROMP experiments are summarized in Table 2. All the complexes show some metathesis activity. Based on the similarity of the IR spectra, the structures of the initiators are closely related and differences in the catalytic properties may be attributed mainly to compositional variations. The most remarkable observation is that within the relative small range of the composition studied the activity of the tungsten complexes is superior to their molybdenum analogs. The rate of the polymerization (VP> varied between 7.8-32.9 moldme h-’ in the case of the tungsten containing initiators with I/PPh, and Br/AsPh, ligand combinations representing the two extremes, respectively. The molybdenum complexes are about two orders of magnitude less active 1) for all catalysts, and rcr, increases with cis content as previously found [12]. The molybdenum complexes with one exception (Cl/PPh,), are more selective toward trans

‘ct 14

13 j 7

1 . 0

0.1

0.2

0.3

?? .e

0

0.4

. .

0.5

Fig. 2. Plot of rCr, against the fraction of double bonds having cis structure,

q. (0):

0.6

0.7 oc

W-, (0): MO-based catalysts.

L. Bent,-e et al./Journul

of Molecular Catu1,wi.vA: Chemical 115 (lYY7) 193-397

not found. Other electronic properties calculated by the Extended Hiickel method [ 141 provided no grounds for rationalizing the results either. The active species are as yet rather poorly characterized. However, some reliable experimental information shows that the catalytically active species contain at least one of each of the ligands (L and X) from the precursor. Earlier studies revealed, that the precursor complexes are liable to loose a CO ligand when heated in solvent [ 151, but one or two CO ligands remain still in the coordination sphere of the transition metal as shown by the intramolecular carbene-CO coupling reactions [16]. The hydrocarbon part of the initiating carbene was identified as a 2-norbornylidene group [16,17]. Four kinds of ligand (L, X, R’R*C= and CO), on the active center are identified by these direct and indirect experimental methods. It may now be deduced that the structure of the initiating carbene complexes is close to the one shown in Fig. 3 which is a 16 electron Schrock type carbene [ 181. Isolation of the carbene complex is in progress.

Fig. 3. Structure x = Cl).

proposed

for an initiating

carbene

(L = PPh,,

197

4. Conclusion A variety of M(CO),X,L,! (M = MO or W; X= Cl, Br or I; L = PPh,, AsPh, or SbPh,) complexes may be activated thermally to initiate the metathesis polymerization of norbornene. At least one of each type of ligand of the precursor remains attached to the transition metal center of the active species.

Acknowledgements This work was supported by the Hungarian Science Foundation under Grant No OTKA T016326.

References [II (a) L.

Bencze and A. Kraut-Vass, J. Organomet. Chem., 270 (1984) 211; (b) L. Bencze and A. Kraut-Vass, J. Mol. Catal., 28 (1985) 369. [2] M.W. Anker, R. Colton and LB. Tomkina, Aust. J. Chem.. 20 (1967) 9. 131 J.A. Bowden and R. Colton, Aust. J. Chem., 21 (1968) 2657. [41 R. Colton and LB. Tomkins, Aust. J. Chem.. 19 (1966) 1143. [51 R. Colton and LB. Tomkins, Aust. J. Chem., 19 (1966) 1519. [6] A. Broomhead, J. Budge and W. Grumley. Inorg. Synth., 16 (1976) 235. [7] R. Colton and C.J. Rix, Aust. J. Chem., 22 ( 1969) 305. [81 P.K. Baker, S.G. Fraser and E.M. Keys, J. Organomet. Chem.. 309 (1986) 319. [9] P.K. Baker and S.G. Fraser, Inorg. Chim. Acta. I16 (1986) LI. [lo] K.J. Ivin, D.T. Laverty and J.J. Rooney, Makromol. Chem.. 178 (1977) 1545. [Ill K.J. Ivin, D.T. Laverty and J.J. Rooney. Makromol. Chem.. 179 (1978) 253. [121 K.J. Ivin, D.T. Laverty, J.H. O’Donnell, J.J. Rooney and C.D. Stewart, Makromol. Chem., 180 (1979) 1989. [I31 R.M.E. Greene, J.G. Hamilton, K.J. Ivin and J.J. Rooney, Makromol. Chem., 187 (1986) 619. 1141 R. Szilagyi, unpublished results (see more in the Supplementary Materials section at URL: http://mml.vein.hu/l [151B. Mohai and L. Bencze. Magyar Kemiai Folyoirat, XI (1975) 128. 1161L. Bencze, A. Kraut-Vass and L. Prokai, J. Chem Sot., Chem. Commun., (1985) 911. t171 L. Bencze and L. Prhkai, J. Organometal. Chem., 294 (1985) c5. R.R. Schrock, M.R. Churchill and H.J. [ISIJ.H. Wengrovius, Wasserman, J. Am. Chem. Sot., 104 (1982) 1739.