Accepted Manuscript Control on the size of porphyry copper reserves in the North Balkhash–West Junggar Metallogenic Belt
Changhao Li, Ping Shen, Hongdi Pan, Eleonora Seitmuratova PII: DOI: Reference:
S0024-4937(19)30050-7 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2019.01.030 LITHOS 4960
To appear in:
LITHOS
Received date: Accepted date:
15 June 2018 26 January 2019
Please cite this article as: C. Li, P. Shen, H. Pan, et al., Control on the size of porphyry copper reserves in the North Balkhash–West Junggar Metallogenic Belt, LITHOS, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2019.01.030
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Control on the size of porphyry copper reserves in the North Balkhash–West Junggar Metallogenic Belt Changhao Li a,b,c, Ping Shen a,b,c*, Hongdi Pan d, Eleonora Seitmuratova e Key Laboratory of Mineral Resources,Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese
PT
a
RI
Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China;
Institutions of Earth Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China;
c
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
d
College of Earth Sciences, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710054, China;
e
Laboratory of Geological Formations, K. Satpaev Institute of Geological Sciences,
MA
NU
SC
b
Name: Ping Shen
PT E
Corresponding author:
D
Almaty 050010, Kazakhstan
AC
CE
E-mail:
[email protected]
Abstract
The North Balkhash–West Junggar Metallogenic Belt is one of the most important areas within the Central Asian Metallogenic Domain. The belt comprises the North Balkhash and West Junggar regions, which have significantly different Cu reserves. We present mineral geochemistry, whole-rock major and trace element chemistry, zircon Hf and O isotope compositions, and zircon trace element chemistry, on the
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT basis of which we conclude that porphyry copper deposits within the belt formed by different processes. We interpret ore-related magmas in the West Junggar region to have formed in an immature arc setting by the partial melting of lower crust (30–40 km), with some mantle input and sediments contamination. In contrast, ore-related
PT
magmas within the North Balkhash region are interpreted to have formed in a mature
RI
arc setting by the partial melting of lower crust (~40 km), with mantle input and
SC
possible upper-crustal contamination. The oxygen fugacities of ore-related intrusions within the North Balkhash region are typically higher than those within the West
NU
Junggar region. A high magmatic water content is considered to be important, but not
MA
sufficient, for the formation of large porphyry copper deposits. Thicker crust and high oxygen fugacity are the two main reasons for the higher Cu reserves in the North
PT E
D
Balkhash region compared with the West Junggar region.
Keywords
CE
Cu reserves difference, crustal thickness, oxygen fugacity, North Balkhash–West
AC
Junggar Metallogenic Belt
1. Introduction Porphyry copper deposits (PCDs) are important because they account for >80% of global copper resources. However, the formation mechanisms of and controls on PCDs remain unclear. Richards (2003, 2011) suggested that the size of PCDs is
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT controlled by magmatic water, oxygen fugacity, and the volume of magma within the shallow magma chambers. Wilkinson (2013) identified four triggers for PCD formation and proposed that sulfide saturation of the magma is the most important factor. Sun et al. (2013) suggested that high oxygen fugacity (fO2) and sulfate
PT
reduction (initially via magnetite crystallization) are also essential. Shen et al. (2015a)
RI
concluded that Ce4+/Ce3+=120 of zircon can be used to discriminate large and
SC
intermediate PCDs from smaller deposits.
The Central Asian Metallogenic Domain comprises significant Cu, Mo, W, and
NU
Fe reserves, and it is one of the most well known metallogenic reserves in the world
MA
(Seltmann et al., 2014). The North Balkhash–West Junggar Metallogenic Belt contains many PCDs (e.g., Aktogai and Baogutu) and is located within the North
D
Balkhash and West Junggar regions in Kazakhstan, and Xinjiang, China, respectively.
PT E
Several studies have investigated the differences between the metal reserves in these two regions (e.g., Shen et al., 2013, 2015). The North Balkhash region contains
CE
several large to giant PCDs, such as the Aktogai and Kounrad deposits. Reserves in
AC
the West Junggar region have yielded less Cu (>0.7 Mt) than those in the North Balkhash region, but the reason for this difference remains unclear. We present mineral geochemistry, whole-rock major and trace element results, zircon Hf and O isotope compositions, and zircon trace element data for the Shiwu deposit in the Xinjiang, China. We also present mineral geochemical data for the Kounrad deposit and mineral geochemistry and zircon trace element data for the barren Koldar Complex in the North Balkhash region. The results of this study are
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT combined with those of previous work (Cao et al., 2014, 2016a, 2016b; Li GM et al., 2016; Li CH et al., 2017; Shen et al., 2013, 2017, 2018) to investigate the differences between the North Balkhash and West Junggar regions, including their magma sources, petrogenesis, and tectonic settings. We present several reasons to explain the
PT
observed difference in the size of Cu reserves from deposits within these two regions.
SC
RI
2. Regional geology
The Central Asian Orogenic Belt records an 800 Myr geological history and is
NU
one of the largest accretionary orogenic belts in the world (Fig. 1a; Sengör et al., 1993;
MA
Kröner et al., 2007). The belt extends from the Ural Mountains in Russia to the Pacific Ocean (west–east) and from Siberia to northern China and Tarim (north–
D
south).
PT E
The North Balkhash region is located in central and eastern Kazakhstan and is an important ore reserve within the North Balkhash–West Junggar Metallogenic Belt
CE
(Fig. 1b; Chen et al., 2014;Li et al., 2017; Shen et al., 2013, 2015, 2017). The strata
AC
within the North Balkhash region comprise Precambrian metamorphic basement rocks, deformed Paleozoic sedimentary and metamorphic rocks, and Mesozoic–Cenozoic sandstones and mudstones (Heinhorst et al., 2000). The Precambrian metamorphic basement rocks are exposed in the western and northern parts of central Kazakhstan and comprise amphibolites, gneisses, and schists. The Paleozoic rocks consist of Cambrian–Ordovician felsic volcanics, carbonates, and terrigenous clastic rocks, Silurian–Devonian
terrigenous
clastic
and
shallow-marine
clastic
rocks,
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Carboniferous volcanic rocks, and Permian basalts–rhyolites and terrestrial volcanic tuffs. Relic early Paleozoic oceanic crust is preserved in central Kazakhstan. These ophiolitic rocks are not interpreted to represent suture zones (Sengör et al., 1993) as they exhibit features consistent with back-arc oceanic crust (Kröner et al., 2007). The
PT
intrusions in this region were emplaced between the Proterozoic and Permian, but
RI
PCDs have closely relationship with the Carboniferous intrusions (Heinhorst et al.,
SC
2000).
The West Junggar region is located in the Xinjiang Province and can be
NU
subdivided into northern and southern parts (Fig. 1c). This study focuses on the
MA
southern West Junggar region, in which Paleozoic volcanic rocks are widespread. The early Paleozoic strata occur primarily within the Mayile area and crop out along the
D
Mayile Fault. The Devonian and Carboniferous strata crop out to the west and east of
PT E
the Mayile Fault, respectively (Fig. 1c). Several NE-trending faults, including (from east to west) the Darbut, Mayile, and Barluk faults, as well as ophiolitic rocks, also
CE
occur in the southern West Junggar region. The granitoids comprise a large batholith
AC
(e.g., the Miaoergou Pluton) that was emplaced during the Variscan (ca. 300 Ma) and small-scale, randomly distributed intermediate–acidic intrusions. The PCDs in this region (e.g., the Baogutu and Shiwu deposits; Fig. 1c) are associated with the latter granitoid type.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 3. Ore geology 3.1 Deposits in the southern West Junggar region 3.1.1 The Shiwu Cu deposit
PT
The Shiwu porphyry Cu deposit was discovered by the No. 1 Regional
RI
Geological Survey Party of the Xinjiang Bureau of Geology and Mineral Exploration
SC
and Development. The deposit is located to the southeast of the Barluk Fault (Fig. 1c)
NU
and is still under exploration. The strata in the Shiwu region comprise Devonian– Carboniferous volcano-sedimentary rocks, including the Middle Devonian Barluk and
MA
Lower Carboniferous Baogutu groups (Fig. 2a). The Barluk Group comprises tuffs, tuffaceous siltstones, crystal-lithic tuffs, feldspar lithic sandstones, andesites, and
PT E
D
andesitic breccias. The Baogutu Group comprises tuffaceous siltstones, feldspar lithic sandstones, tuffs, and limestone lenses. Abundant NE-trending faults are observed in the Shiwu region (Fig. 2a). Diorite and quartz-diorite intrusions within this region
CE
were emplaced at ca. 322 Ma (Hu et al., 2018) into the Middle Devonian Barluk
AC
Group (Fig. 2a). Disseminated and vein-hosted mineralization within the Shiwu deposit is associated primarily with quartz-diorite and tonalite porphyries that were emplaced at ca. 310 Ma (Li et al., 2017). The quartz-diorite porphyries (SA figure 1a, c) are closely associated with hydrothermal alteration and mineralization, whereas the tonalite porphyries (SA figure 1b, d) are associated with propylitic alteration and local disseminated mineralization within outcrop. Regardless, we consider the tonalite porphyries as ore-related intrusions because of their association with disseminated
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT mineralization, as revealed by previous limited ore exploration projects. The hydrothermal alteration includes potassic, sericitic, and propylitic alteration. Potassic alteration occurs only within the lower sections of the drill core and is characterized by K-feldspar, quartz, and biotite. Sericite alteration is ubiquitous and is characterized
PT
by quartz, sericite, and chlorite. Propylitic alteration is characterized by quartz,
RI
chlorite, epidote, and actinolite and is observed within outcrop and within the drill
SC
core. The hydrothermal fluids correspond to the H2O–NaCl–CO2(–C2H6–CH4) system, and their homogenization temperatures and salinities are 130°C–458°C and 0.2–54.5
MA
3.1.2 The Jiamantieliek Cu deposit
NU
wt.% NaCleq, respectively (Li et al., 2017).
D
The Jiamantieliek porphyry Cu deposit was first discovered by the Bureau of
PT E
Geology and Mineral Resources of the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region and is located to the northwest of the Barluk Fault (Fig. 1c). The deposit is hosted within
CE
Middle Devonian volcano-sedimentary sequences of the Tielieketi and Barluk groups
AC
(Fig. 2b). The Tielieketi Group comprises conglomerates, calcareous sandstones, tuffs, and tuffaceous siltstones. The Barluk Group comprises sandstones, glutenite, tuffaceous sandstones, coal beds, calcareous tuffs, and argillaceous siltstones. NE- and NW-trending faults occur within this area (Fig. 2b). The Jiamantieliek intrusion comprises diorite and quartz-diorite and was emplaced at ca. 313 Ma (Shen et al., 2013) within the Middle Devonian Barluk Group (Fig. 2b). Several diorite and quartz-diorite porphyries were emplaced at ca. 310 Ma, cross-cutting the main
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT intrusive bodies and volcano-sedimentary sequences (Shen et al., 2013). Mineralization was associated with emplacement of these diorites and quartz-diorites. Hydrothermal alteration includes propylitic, silicatic, and calcitic alteration (Shen et
PT
al., 2013).
RI
3.1.3 The Baogutu Cu deposit
SC
The Baogutu porphyry Cu deposit is located to the southwest of the Darbut Fault (Fig. 1c) and was the first PCD to be discovered in the West Junggar region. This
NU
deposit contains 0.63 Mt Cu, 0.018 Mt Mo, and 14 t Au (Shen et al., 2010). The
MA
deposit is hosted within Lower Carboniferous volcano-sedimentary sequences of the Xibeikulasi and Baogutu groups (Fig. 2c). The Xibeikulasi Group comprises
D
greywackes that exhibit graded bedding, tuffaceous mudstones, and tuffaceous
PT E
siltstones showing soft-sediment deformation textures. The Baogutu Group includes tuffaceous siltstones, tuffs, feldspar lithic sandstones, and limestone lenses.
CE
NE-trending faults are observed in this region (Fig. 2c). The Baogutu Complex
AC
contains diorite, quartz-diorite, and late diorite porphyries and was emplaced at ca. 313 Ma (Shen et al., 2013) within the Lower Carboniferous Baogutu Group (Fig. 2c). Mineralization is associated with the diorites and late diorite porphyries (Shen et al., 2010). Hydrothermal alteration includes potassic, propylitic, and sericitic alteration. Potassic alteration was responsible for disseminated Cu mineralization and is characterized by biotite, magnetite, K-feldspar, and quartz. The propylitic alteration is characterized by quartz, chlorite, epidote, and calcite and occurs predominantly within
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT the wall-rocks. The sericite alteration is characterized by quartz and sericite, overprints zones of potassic and propylitic alteration, and is associated with the highest ore grades. Various sulfide minerals occur, including pyrrhotite, pyrite, chalcopyrite, and molybdenite (Fig. 2c). The hydrothermal fluids correspond to the
PT
H2O–NaCl–CH4(–CO2) system and have homogenization temperatures and salinities
RI
of 151°C–530°C, and 0.2–63.9 wt.% NaCleq, respectively. The Baogutu deposit
SC
contains large amounts of pyrrhotite and CH4 gas and is regarded as a reduced PCD
NU
(Shen and Pan, 2013, 2015; Cao et al., 2014, 2016b).
3.2.1 The Kounrad Cu deposit
MA
3.2 Deposits in the North Balkhash region
PT E
D
The Kounrad Cu deposit is located 15 km north of Balkhash township, was exploited in 1934, and contains >5 Mt Cu and >600 t Au (Seltmann et al., 2014). The deposit is hosted within Upper Devonian sandstones, shales, and minor interbedded
CE
felsic tuffs, and Early Carboniferous andesitic basalts, andesites, and dacites.
AC
NW-trending faults are observed in this region (Fig. 3a–1). The main intrusions comprise the Toktay Complex, which was emplaced prior to mineralization, ore-related granodiorite porphyries (SA figure 1i, j), and dikes that were emplaced post-mineralization
(Fig.
3a–1).
The
Toktay
Complex
comprises
diorites,
granodiorites, and porphyritic granodiorites intruded into volcano-sedimentary rocks, with the diorites and granodiorites being emplaced between 361 to 339 Ma (Li et al., 2016). The ore-related granodiorite porphyry being emplaced between 331 to 325 Ma
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT (Chen et al., 2014; Li et al., 2016; Shen et al., 2017). Hydrothermal alteration and mineralization comprise three stages (Zvezdov et al., 1993; Seltmann et al., 2014). The earliest hydrothermal alteration phase involved quartz–sericite and quartz– sericite–diaspore alteration, occurred during the final stages of volcanism, and was
PT
not associated with mineralization. The second hydrothermal alteration phase was
RI
caused by emplacement of the granodiorite porphyry and involved silica, sericite,
SC
propylitic, and late argillic alteration (Figs 2 and 3a). Compared with typical PCDs, the Kounrad deposit is associated with a higher amount of silicic alteration than
NU
potassic alteration. The final hydrothermal alteration phase was associated with
MA
emplacement of the late intrusions and dikes. This phase of alteration was characterized by mica–quartz–tourmaline alteration in the porphyritic granodiorites
D
and felsic dikes and by the formation of hydrothermal albite, K-feldspar, and biotite
PT E
within the dolerite dikes. The sulfide minerals comprise pyrite, chalcopyrite, bornite, molybdenite, enargite, and chalcocite (Fig. 3a–3). The hydrothermal fluids correspond
CE
to the H2O–NaCl–CO2 system and have homogenization temperatures and salinities
AC
of 151°C–490°C and 0.4–58.4 wt.% NaCleq, respectively (unpublished data).
3.2.2 The Aktogai Cu deposit
The Aktogai deposit is located 22 km from the Aktogai Railway Station, within the Balkhash–Ili Terrane, and contains >5.8 Mt Cu and 68 t Au (Seltmann et al., 2014). The deposit is hosted within the Upper Carboniferous–Lower Permian Koldarskaya and Middle–Upper Carboniferous Keregetasskaya groups (Fig. 3b–2). The
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Koldarskaya Group comprises sedimentary rocks, volcano-sedimentary sequences, and minor felsic tuffs. The Keregetasskaya Group contains andesites and rare siltstones and rhyolites. NE- and NW-trending faults are observed in this area. The main intrusions are the Koldar Pluton (SA figure 1f, h), granodiorite porphyries, and
PT
dikes, which were emplaced before, during, and after mineralization, respectively (Fig.
RI
3b–1). The Koldar Pluton is compositionally variable, comprises primarily
SC
quartz-diorite and diorite (Zvezdov et al., 1993), and was emplaced at ca. 344.7 Ma (Cao et al., 2016). Ore-related tonalite porphyry (SA figure 1e, g) intruded the Koldar
NU
Pluton between 331 to 327 Ma (Chen et al., 2014; Cao et al., 2016; Shen et al., 2018),
MA
and several dikes and intrusive bodies were emplaced after mineralization. The hydrothermal alteration includes potassic, propylitic, and sericite–chlorite alteration
D
(Fig. 3b–3; Li et al., 2018a). The potassic alteration is characterized by hydrothermal
PT E
K-feldspar, quartz, biotite, and magnetite and is associated with disseminated and vein-hosted mineralization. The sericite–chlorite alteration forms high-grade ore zone,
CE
overprints the zones of potassic alteration, is characterized by sericite, quartz, and
AC
chlorite, and is associated with disseminated and vein-hosted mineralization. The propylitic alteration is characterized by chlorite and epidote, and is associated with disseminated and vein-hosted mineralization, but to a lesser extent than the other two alteration stages. The sulfide minerals include pyrite, chalcopyrite, bornite, and molybdenite (Fig. 3b–3). The hydrothermal fluids correspond to the H2O–NaCl–CO2 system and have homogenization temperatures and salinities of 162°C–466°C and 0.4–51.1 wt.% NaCleq, respectively (Li et al., 2018b).
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 4. Samples and methods We analyzed samples of the Shiwu Cu deposit, Kounrad Cu deposit and barren Koldar Complex in this study. Samples selected from outcrop and drill holes. Five
PT
samples of the Shiwu deposit, three samples of the Kounrad deposit, and two samples of the barren Koldar Complex are used to electron microprobe analysis (EMPA),
RI
respectively. Two samples of the Shiwu deposit are used to whole rock major and
SC
trace elements and zircon Hf-O isotopes analysis, respectively. Two samples of the
NU
Shiwu deposit and one sample of the barren Koldar Complex are used to zircon trace elements analysis. Considering some data have large variation, we use geometric
MA
mean (geomean) in this study to decrease the effect of extreme values. All samples are examined in the Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of
PT E
D
Sciences (IGGCAS).
Major and trace element components of mineral are examined using a JXA 8100 electron microprobe with a voltage of 15kV, a beam current of 20nA, a spot size
CE
of 5μm and 20s peak counting time. The synthetic oxides and natural minerals are
AC
used calibration: apatite (P), diopside (Ca and Si), rutile (Ti), jadeite (Na and Al), garnet (Fe), bustamite (Mn), pyrope (Mg), K-feldspar (K), fluorite (F), tugtupite (Cl) and barite (S). The spectral line adopted of each element is P (66.764), Si (77.371), Ti (88.751), Al (90.551), Fe (134.625), Mn (146.186), Mg (107.399), Ca (107.907), Na (129.393), K (120.157), F (84.249), Cl (151.416) and S (171.68), respectively. Major elements of igneous rocks are analyzed using Shimadzu XRF-1700/1500 X-ray fluorescence spectrometer after fusion with lithium tetraborate. Duplicate
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT analysis of Chinese national reference GBW07101-07114 reveals the precision is 1% of quoted values for elements greater than 5 wt%, and 10% of quoted values for elements less than 5 wt% in the reported values. Loss on ignition (LOI) is measured as weight loss of samples after 1h baking at temperature of 1000℃. Trace element
PT
abundance is analyzed using a Thermo-Finnigan ELEMENT inductively coupled
RI
plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) after HNO3 + HF digestion of ~40 mg of sample
SC
powder in a Teflon vessel at 150℃. Analytical precision and accuracy are monitored by Chinese national reference GSR1 (granite), GSR2 (rhyolite) and GSR3 (basalt).
NU
The precision is 5% of the quoted values for elements present at >1ppm, and about
MA
10% for elements present less than 1ppm. Accuracy is estimate to be superior to 5% in the reported values.
D
Oxygen isotope components are analyzed on zircon grains used for SIMS U-Pb
PT E
dating. Samples are re-polished to ensure any oxygen implanted in the zircon surface from the O2- beam used for U-Pb analysis was removed. Zircon oxygen isotopes are
CE
examined using the same Cameca IMS-1280 SIMS. Analytical procedures are similar
AC
with the description provided by Li et al (2010) and Tang et al. (2015). The Cs+ primary ion beam is accelerated at 10 kV to sputter zircon for O-isotope analysis. Primary beam size is ~10μm in diameter, and ~2nA in intensity. Oxygen isotopes are measured in multi-collector static mode using two off-axis Faraday cups. Normal electron gun is used to compensate charging effect in the bombarding area. The NMR (Nuclear Magnetic Resonance) probe is used for magnetic field control. One analysis takes ~3 min composing of pre-sputtering (20 s), automatic beam centering
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT (~90 s) and integration of oxygen isotopes (16 cycles × 4 s, total 64 s). The instrumental mass fractionation factor (IMF) was corrected using Penglai zircon standard with δ18O = 5.25±0.10‰ (2σ; Li et al., 2010). Qinghu zircon is a second zircon standard analyzed as an unknown to ascertain the veracity of the IMF.
PT
Repeated analyses of them during the course of analysis got mean δ18O value of
RI
5.49±0.24‰ (2σ; n=4), which is consistent with recommended value for Qinghu
SC
zircon (5.39±0.10‰ (2σ)) (Li et al., 2013).
In situ zircon Lu-Hf isotopic analyses are examined using a Neptune
NU
multi-collector ICP-MS interfaced with a Geolas-193 laser-ablation system. Lu-Hf
MA
isotopic analyses are measured on same zircon grains. Analyses parameters are 44μm of spot size, 26s of ablation time, 8Hz of repetition rate and 10J/cm2 of laser beam
176
Hf/177Hf ratio for the standard zircon Mud Tank is
PT E
al. (2006). The
D
energy density. Instrumental conditions and data acquisition are as described by Wu et
176
0.282500±0.000030 for the standard. Measured 176
176
Lu/177Hf ratios are
Hf/177Hf ratios, taking the decay constant for
176
Lu as
CE
used to calculate initial
Hf/177Hf and
176
AC
1.867×10-11a-1 (Söderlund et al., 2004). The present-day chondritic ratios of Hf/177Hf = 0.282785 and
176
Lu/177Hf = 0.0336 (Bouvier et al., 2008) are used to
calculate εHf(t) values. The depleted mantle Hf model ages (TDM2) are calculated using the measured
176
Lu/177Hf ratios of zircon. The mantle extraction model age
(TDM2) is calculated by projecting initial depleted mantle model growth line using continental crust (Griffin et al., 2002).
176
Lu/177Hf ratios of the zircon to the
176
Lu/177Hf value (0.015) for average
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Zircon trace elements analyses are examined using an ArF excimer laser ablation system, attached to a Neptune Plasma multi-collector ICP-MS with a Geolas-193 laser-ablation system (LA-MC-ICP-MS). Analyses parameters are 40μm of ablation pit in diameter, 26s of ablation time and 6 to 8Hz of a laser pulse frequency. The
PT
detailed analytical procedures are same as those provided by Yuan et al (2004).
RI
Helium was used as a carrier gas to transport the ablated sample from the
SC
laser-ablation cell to the ICP-MS torch through a mixing chamber where it is mixed with argon. Reference material and internal calibrant are NIST SRM 610 and
Si,
NU
respectively.
29
MA
5. Results
PT E
5.1.1 Plagioclase
D
5.1 Mineral geochemistry of the intrusive rocks
CE
Representative EMPA chemical compositions (wt.%) and the calculated formulae for plagioclase are provided in Supplementary Material A1. Plagioclase from the
AC
Shiwu deposit exhibits significant compositional variation (Fig. 4a). The FeO and CaO contents and An and Al*(Al* = (Al/(Ca + K + Na)-1)/(An/100)) ratios of plagioclase crystals from the quartz-diorite porphyries are 0.17–0.41 wt.%, 7.66– 11.95 wt.%, 37–58, and 0.88–0.99, respectively (Fig. 4b). These values for plagioclase from the tonalite porphyries are 0.12–0.88 wt.%, 6.14–12.98 wt.%, 30–63, and 0.86–1.18, respectively, and for plagioclase from the quartz-diorite and diorite
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT intrusions that were emplaced after mineralization within the Shiwu deposit are 0.18– 0.73 wt.%, 6.12–13.58 wt.%, 30–68, and 0.80–0.96, respectively (Fig. 4b). Plagioclase crystals from granodiorite porphyries within the Kounrad deposit exhibit little compositional variation (Fig. 4a), with FeO and CaO contents and An and Al*
PT
ratios of 0.14–0.20 wt.%, 5.75–7.85 wt.%, 28–38, and 0.91–1.03, respectively (Fig.
RI
4b). These values for plagioclase crystals from granodiorites within the barren Koldar
SC
Complex are 0.13–0.35 wt.%, 5.92–11.01 wt.%, 29–54, and 0.66–1.56, respectively (Fig. 4b). The compositions of plagioclase from the Aktogai and Baogutu deposits
NU
have been investigated by previous studies (Shen and Pan, 2013; Cao et al., 2014; Li
MA
et al., 2018a, 2018b). The FeO and CaO contents and An and Al* ratios of plagioclase crystals from tonalite porphyries within the Aktogai deposit are 0.12–0.33 wt.%,
D
5.58–7.21 wt.%, 27–35, and 0.80–1.05, respectively (Fig. 4b). These values for
PT E
plagioclase from ore-related diorites within the Baogutu deposit are 0.10–0.53 wt.%, 5.75–11.33 wt.%, 28–55, and 0.77–1.37, respectively (Fig. 4b). The FeO and CaO
CE
contents and An and Al* values of plagioclase crystals from gabbros and tonalite
AC
porphyries within the Baogutu deposit that were emplaced prior to and after mineralization, respectively, are 0.06–0.62 wt.%, 5.19–11.54 wt.%, 24–57, and 0.76– 1.16, respectively (Fig. 4b).
5.1.2 Biotite
Representative EMPA chemical compositions (wt.%) and calculated formulae for biotite are provided in Supplementary Material A2. Biotite crystals from granodiorite
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT porphyries within the Kounrad deposit are Mg rich, show little compositional variation (Fig. 4c), and have TiO2 contents and Mg/(Mg + Fetotal) and Fe3+/(Fe2+ + Fe3+) ratios of 1.15–2.66 wt.%, 0.48–0.60, and 0.12–0.28, respectively. The Mg–Fe3+– Fe2+ diagram in Figure 4d reveals that the majority of samples have high oxygen
PT
fugacities (>NNO). Biotites from granodiorites within the barren Koldar Complex are
RI
also Mg rich, have high oxygen fugacities (>NNO; Fig. 4c and d), and have TiO2
SC
contents and Mg/(Mg + TFe) and Fe3+/(Fe2+ + Fe3+) ratios of 3.78–5.39 wt.%, 0.48– 0.51, and 0.18–0.23, respectively. The compositions of biotite from ore-related
NU
diorites and from post-mineralization tonalite porphyries within the Baogutu deposit
MA
have been investigated previously (Shen and Pan, 2013, 2015). Biotite crystals from the diorites are Mg rich but have variable compositions and oxygen fugacities (Fig. 4c
D
and d). These crystals have TiO2 contents and Mg/(Mg + TFe) and Fe3+/(Fe2+ + Fe3+)
PT E
ratios of 0.93–4.61 wt.%, 0.48–0.77, and 0.00–0.35, respectively. Biotites from the tonalite porphyries are Mg rich, have high oxygen fugacities (>NNO; Fig. 4c and d),
CE
and have TiO2 contents and Mg/(Mg + TFe) and Fe3+/(Fe2+ + Fe3+) values of 0.91–
AC
4.72 wt.%, 0.52–0.65, and 0.11–0.23, respectively.
5.1.3 Amphibole
Representative EMPA chemical compositions (wt.%) and calculated formulae for amphibole are provided in Supplementary Material A3. Amphiboles from the granodiorite porphyries within the Kounrad deposit show little compositional variation (Si = 7.03–7.42 a.p.f.u.) and classify as Mg-rich hornblende (Fig. 4e).
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT According to the calculations of Ridolfi et al. (2010), the formation temperatures and pressures, △NNO and logfO2 values, and H2O contents of the melt are 732°C–804°C, 58–102 MPa, 1.18–2.00, −13.43 to −12.49, and 4.03–4.83 wt.%, respectively (Fig. 4f). These values are 659°C–786°C, 56–116 MPa, 0.46–1.48, −14.61 to −13.66, and 4.70–
PT
5.69 wt.%, respectively, for granodiorites within the barren Koldar Complex. The
RI
compositions of amphiboles from ore-related intrusions within the Shiwu and
SC
Baogutu deposits have been investigated previously (Li et al., 2017; Shen and Pan, 2013, 2015). The formation temperatures and pressures, △NNO and logfO2 values,
NU
and H2O contents of quartz-diorite porphyries within the Shiwu deposit are 717°C–
MA
797°C, 51–107 MPa, 1.56–2.09, −13.89 to −12.31, and 3.90–4.87 wt.%, respectively (Fig. 4f). These values are 771°C–828°C, 79–129 MPa, 1.14–1.78, −12.93 to −11.87,
D
and 3.39–4.88 wt.%, respectively (Fig. 4f), for diorites within the Baogutu deposit.
PT E
These values for the gabbros (pre-mineralization) and tonalite porphyries (post-mineralization) within the Baogutu deposit are 640°C–877°C, 25–136 MPa,
CE
1.12–3.24, −15.13 to −12.01, and 2.95–4.99 wt.%, respectively.
AC
5.2 Whole-rock major and trace element chemistry Whole-rock geochemical data from this study and previous studies (e.g., Cao et al., 2016a, b; Li et al., 2016, 2017; Hu et al, 2018; Shen et al., 2013, 2015, 2017, 2018) indicate that the ore-related intrusions within the Shiwu, Jiamantieliek, Baogutu, Kounrad, and Aktogai deposits are compositionally variable (Supplementary Material B). The Kounrad and Aktogai deposits have similar SiO2 contents (65.51–76.17 wt.%),
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT and the Shiwu and Jiamantieliek deposits have similar SiO2 contents (57.27–69.12 wt.%). Rocks within the Baogutu deposit have lower SiO2 contents (53.76–62.88 wt.%). In the TAS diagram in Figure 5a, the compositions of samples from the Shiwu, Jiamantieliek, and Kounrad deposits fall within the granodiorite field. Samples from
PT
the Baogutu and Aktogai deposits are compositionally variable and are classified as
RI
gabbro-diorite to diorite and granodiorite to granite, respectively (Fig. 5a). In the
SC
SiO2–K2O diagram of Figure 5b, samples from the West Junggar region fall within the low-K tholeiite and medium-K calc-alkaline fields. In contrast, samples from the
NU
North Balkhash region fall within the medium-K calc-alkaline and high-K
MA
calc-alkaline fields. Except for the Baogutu deposit (MgO >3.60 wt.%), the MgO contents of the deposits are consistent (1.15–2.87 wt.%). The Mg-number (Mg#) and
D
Fe2O3T/(Fe2O3T + MgO) ratios of the samples range between 0.46 and 0.87 (Fig. 5c)
PT E
and 0.46 and 0.75 (excluding two samples, Fig. 5d), respectively, indicating that they are Mg rich. The chondrite-normalized rare earth element (REE) patterns of the
CE
analyzed samples are enriched in light REEs (LREEs) and show slightly negative to
AC
flat Eu anomalies (0.85–1.23, Fig. 6a, c, e, g, and i). The primitive-mantle-normalized trace element spider diagrams reveal consistent patterns across all samples, pronounced negative Nb, Ta, and Zr anomalies, and positive Sr and K anomalies (Fig. 6b, d, f, h, and j).
5.3 In situ zircon O isotope compositions Zircon O isotope compositions are provided in Supplementary Material C. We
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT calculated the δ18O values of melt by using the following equation (Valley et al., 2005): △18O(zircon − whole rock) = −0.0612(SiO2 wt.%) + 2.5. Eighteen zircon grains from a quartz-diorite porphyry within the Shiwu deposit yielded δ18O values of +7.06‰ to +8.02‰ (geomean = +7.54‰; Fig. 7a) and calculated melt δ18O values of
PT
+8.59‰ to +9.55‰ (geomean = +9.07‰; Fig. 7e). Twenty-one zircon grains from a
RI
tonalite porphyry within the Shiwu deposit yielded δ18O values of +5.36‰ to +6.38‰
SC
(geomean = +5.79‰; Fig. 7a) and calculated melt δ18O values of +6.83‰ to +7.85‰ (geomean = +7.27‰; Fig. 7e). The δ18O values of the samples analyzed in this study
NU
are higher than those of depleted mantle (+5.3 ± 0.3‰; Valley et al., 2005).
MA
The zircon δ18O values of diorites within the Baogutu deposit range between +5.75‰ and +6.47‰ (geomean = +6.08‰, n = 32; Fig. 7b; Cao et al., 2016b) and
D
calculated melt δ18O values of +6.81‰ to +7.53‰ (geomean = +7.14‰; Fig. 7f).
PT E
These values are also higher than those of depleted mantle. The zircon δ18O values of granodiorite porphyries within the Kounrad deposit
CE
range between +5.01‰ and +6.90‰ (geomean = +6.03‰, n = 41; Fig. 7c; Li et al.,
AC
2016; Shen et al., 2017), and their calculated melt δ18O values range between +6.64‰ and +8.65 ‰ (geomean = +7.72‰; Fig. 7g). These values are consistent with or slightly higher than those of depleted mantle. The zircon δ18O values of tonalite porphyries within the Aktogai deposit range between +4.3‰ and +5.9‰ (geomean = +5.15‰, n = 103; Fig. 7d; Cao et al., 2016a; Shen et al., 2018), and their calculated melt δ18O values range between +6.0‰ and +7.6‰ (geomean = +6.84‰; Fig. 7h). These values are consistent with or slightly
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT lower than those of depleted mantle.
5.4 In situ zircon Hf isotope compositions We used same parameters ratios (such as
176
Hf/177Hf and
176
Lu/177Hf etc), which
PT
have little difference in previous works, when calculating isotope values. The
RI
parameters used in this study are listed in Section 4.
SC
Zircon Hf isotope compositions for the Shiwu deposit are provided in Supplementary Material C. Zircon grains from quartz-diorite porphyries within the 176
Hf/177Hf ratios of 0.282764–0.283007, calculated
NU
Shiwu deposit yielded
MA
(176Hf/177Hf)i values of 0.282757–0.283001, εHf(t) values of +5.92 to +14.56 (Fig. 8a), and TDM2(Hf) ages of 921–368 Ma (mainly <669 Ma; Fig. 8e).
Hf/177Hf ratios of 0.282770–0.283041, calculated (176Hf/177Hf)i values of 0.282763–
PT E
176
D
Zircon grains from tonalite porphyries within the Shiwu deposit yielded
0.283034, εHf(t) values of +6.12 to +15.72 (Fig. 8a), and TDM2(Hf) ages of 909–294
CE
Ma (mainly 784–408 Ma; Fig. 8e).
Zircon grains from diorites within the Baogutu deposit have yielded
176
Hf/177Hf
AC
ratios of 0.282906–0.283034 (Cao et al., 2016b), calculated (176Hf/177Hf)i values of 0.282899–0.283018, εHf(t) values of +11.01 to +15.20 (Fig. 8b), and TDM2(Hf) ages of 598–330 Ma (Fig. 8f). Zircon grains from granodiorite porphyries within the Kounrad deposit have yielded
176
Hf/177Hf ratios of 0.282730–0.282934 (Li et al., 2016; Shen et al., 2017),
calculated (176Hf/177Hf)i values of 0.282726–0.282916, εHf(t) values of +5.29 to
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT +11.88 (Fig. 8c), and TDM2(Hf) ages of 978–553 Ma (mainly >684 Ma; Fig. 8g). Zircon grains from tonalite porphyries within the Aktogai deposit have yielded 176
Hf/177Hf ratios of 0.282846–0.283074 (Cao et al., 2016a; Shen et al., 2018),
calculated (176Hf/177Hf)i values of 0.282842–0.283068, εHf(t) values of +9.33 to
PT
+17.33 (Fig. 8d), and TDM2(Hf) ages of 719–205 Ma (mainly 595–318 Ma; Fig. 8h).
SC
RI
5.5 Zircon trace element
The concentrations of REEs, U, Th, Hf, and Ti in zircon and the
NU
chondrite-normalized REE patterns are presented in Supplementary Material D. The
MA
traditional method for calculating the Ce anomaly is not accurate because La and Pr concentrations in zircon are often close to the detection limit of these elements. We
D
therefore used the method of Ballard et al. (2002) to calculate the Ce4+/Ce3+ ratios and
PT E
the method of Ferry and Watson (2007) to estimate zircon crystallization temperatures. The Eu/Eu* values (Eu* = EuN/(SmN × GdN)1/2) were calculated by normalizing the
CE
Sm and Gd concentrations. The zircon crystallization temperatures and the Eu/Eu*
AC
and Ce4+/Ce3+ values of the quartz-diorite porphyries in the Shiwu deposit (n = 7) are 786°C–1004°C (geomean = 84°C), 0.25–0.39 (geomean = 0.31), and 24–38 (geomean = 29), respectively (Fig. 9a and b). These values for the tonalite porphyries within the Shiwu deposit (n = 14) are 689°C–781°C (geomean = 723°C), 0.48–0.74 (geomean = 0.61), and 39–122 (geomean = 74), respectively (Fig. 9a and b). These values for granites within the barren Koldar Complex (n = 8) are 720°C–1284°C (geomean = 840°C), 0.10–0.23 (geomean = 0.16), and 11–69 (geomean = 26), respectively (Fig.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 9a and b).
6. Discussion 6.1 Magma sources
PT
Previous studies have suggested that the ore-related intrusions within the Aktogai
RI
and Kounrad deposits were sourced predominantly from juvenile lower crust with
SC
little mantle contribution (Shen et al., 2018) and with 5%–15% ancient crust (Li et al.,
NU
2016; Shen et al., 2017), respectively. The intrusions in both deposits are interpreted to have formed by the partial melting of thick crust (~40 km) and subsequent
MA
assimilation (Shen et al., 2018). Accordingly, Sections 6.1 and 6.2 focus on the West Junggar region.
D
The ore-related intrusive bodies within the Shiwu, Jiamantieliek, and Baogutu
PT E
deposits have high SiO2, Sr, and Ba contents, moderately fractionated REE patterns, and low Eu contents (Figs 5 and 6a–f). These observations suggest that their parent
CE
magmas were sourced from lower crust that contained abundant amphibole and lesser
AC
garnet (Sen and Dunn, 1994). The average Mg# values of the three deposits are 0.58 (n = 8), 0.67 (n = 11), and 0.63 (n = 41), respectively, reflecting the involvement of mantle material (Rapp and Watson, 1995). The concentrations of some mobile elements (e.g., Sr) within the deposits were affected by hydrothermal alteration, as evidenced by their variable LOI contents (0.48–7.03 wt.%). Some high-field-strength elements such as Nb, Ta, and Ti, and some robust igneous minerals such as zircon, are capable of recording the original geochemical characteristics of the parent magma
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT (Trail et al., 2012). The Nb/Ta ratios of the intrusions can reflect their magma source because these elements are unaffected by magmatic differentiation, crustal assimilation, and hydrothermal alteration (Hawkesworth et al., 1993). Previous studies (e.g., Hofmann, 1988; Plank and Langmuir, 1998; Rudnick and Gao, 2003)
PT
have calculated the Nb/Ta ratios of primitive mantle, N-MORB, lower crust, upper
RI
crust, and marine sediments to be 17.59, 18.27, 8.33, 13.33, and 14.19, respectively.
SC
The Nb/Ta ratios of rocks from the Shiwu, Jiamantieliek, and Baogutu deposits are 11.40–13.53 (geomean = 12.21, n = 14), 12.27–15.63 (geomean = 13.66, n = 11), and
NU
11.87–19.80 (geomean = 15.27, n = 41), respectively. The Nb/Ta ratios of rocks from
MA
the Shiwu and Jiamantieliek deposits fall between those of the primitive mantle and lower crust. Rocks from the Baogutu deposit have variable Nb/Ta values that fall
D
between those of N-MORB and the lower crust.
PT E
Zircons preserve reliable records of magmatic isotope ratios and can therefore be used to trace magma sources. The average εHf(t) values of rocks from the Shiwu and
CE
Baogutu deposits are +10.64 (n = 14; tonalite porphyry in the Shiwu deposit), +11.29
AC
(n = 16; quartz-diorite porphyry in the Shiwu deposit), and +13.42 (n = 68; diorite in the Baogutu deposit). These values are similar to the εHf(t) values of depleted mantle (εHf(t) = +15.8; Salters and Stracke, 2004). The average δ18O value of rocks from the Baogutu deposit is +6.08 (n = 32), which is slightly higher than mantle δ18O values. Rocks from the Shiwu deposit yield two peaks in δ18O. A tonalite porphyry from the Shiwu deposit yielded an average δ18O value of +5.79, which is similar with mantle δ18O values. A quartz-diorite porphyry, also from the Shiwu deposit, yielded an
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT average δ18O value of +7.54, which is substantially higher than mantle δ18O values (Fig. 7a). The high δ18O values (between +5.3‰ and +7.5‰) may reflect the recycling of supracrustal material into the parent magma. Even higher δ18O values (> +7.5‰) from the quartz-diorite porphyry may reflect the intra-crustal recycling of
PT
high δ18O material and/or maturation of the crust (Valley et al., 2005). The zircon
RI
TDM2(Hf) ages of rocks from the Baogutu deposit (average TDM2(Hf) = 436 Ma, n = 68)
SC
are suggestive of a juvenile lower-crustal source. The zircon TDM2(Hf) ages of rocks
juvenile lower-crustal source (Fig. 8e).
NU
from the Shiwu deposit occur over a wide range (921–294 Ma) but similarly imply a
MA
The whole-rock trace element chemistry and zircon Hf and O isotope data collectively suggest that the parent magmas of rocks within the Shiwu, Jiamantieliek,
D
and Baogutu deposits were sourced from juvenile lower crust with minor
PT E
mantle-derived components. The quartz-diorite porphyry within the Shiwu deposit
CE
was also contaminated by marine sediments (Fig. 10).
AC
6.2 Petrogenesis and tectonic setting In the (Al2O3 + TFe2O3 + MgO + TiO2)–Al2O3/(TFe2O3 + MgO + TiO2) diagram in Fig. 11a, the majority of the samples fall between the “high pressure” and “low pressure” fields, reflecting crust–mantle interaction (Patiňo Douce, 1999). Previous studies (e.g., Rapp and Waston, 1995; Van Westrenen et al., 2001; Barth et al., 2002) have suggested that a clinopyroxene-rich residue will lead to low La/Yb (<20), La/Sm (<4), and Sm/Yb (<3) ratios within the melt, whereas an amphibole-rich residue will
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT lead to higher La/Yb (>20–30), La/Sm (>4), and Sm/Yb (3–5) ratios, and a garnet-rich residue will lead to high La/Yb (>30) and Sm/Yb (>5) ratios. As pressure increases, the source transitions from being rich in clinopyroxene to being rich in amphibole and subsequently in garnet (Rapp and Waston, 1995; Shen et al., 2018).
PT
The PCDs within the West Junggar region were therefore derived from a shallower
RI
source than that of the PCDs within the North Balkhash region, and their source vary
SC
from 30–40km to ~40 km (Fig. 12). The PCDs within the West Junggar region have lower Th and LREE contents and Ce/Yb ratios but higher TiO2 contents
NU
(Supplementary Material B) compared with the PCDs within the North Balkhash
MA
region, reflecting a smaller formation pressure (e.g., Hildreth and Moorbath, 1988). The North Balkhash region has higher K2O contents (geomean = 3.11) and lower
D
Na2O/K2O ratios (geomean = 1.30) compared with the West Junggar region (geomean
PT E
K2O = 1.36, geomean Na2O/K2O = 3.04). Rapp et al. (2002) suggested that different magma sources, degrees of partial melting, and the pressure at which melting occurs
CE
can affect the K2O contents of melts. High K2O contents may reflect very small
AC
amounts of melting (<10%) or increasing pressure. As discussed in Section 6.1 and in previous studies (Shen et al., 2017, 2018), the parent magmas of rocks within the PCDs in the North Balkhash–West Junggar Belt are inferred to have been generated from similar sources (i.e., juvenile lower crust with a mantle-derived component). The high K2O contents cannot be associated with low degrees of partial melting (<10%) because K and LILEs behave as highly incompatible elements during melting, and therefore the LILE contents (e.g., Ba, Th, U, and Sr) are expected to be high if the
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT K2O contents were also high (Fig. 6). Therefore, the high K2O contents of the PCDs within the North Balkhash region more likely reflect high-pressure conditions during melting. It is also possible that wall-rock assimilation may have affected the K2O contents of the ascending magmas. At present, this possibility cannot be excluded as
PT
there are limited geochemical studies on this region.
RI
In the Nb + Y–Rb diagram in Figure 13a, the samples show little compositional
SC
variation and fall within the “VAG” field. In the Nb/Yb–Th/Yb diagram in Figure 13b, samples from the Kounrad and Aktogai deposits fall within the “continental-arc” field,
NU
whereas samples from the Shiwu, Jiamantieliek, and Baogutu deposits fall within the
MA
“overlapping region” field. In Figure 13c and d, samples from the Shiwu, Jiamantieliek, and Baogutu deposits fall mainly within the “overlapping region” field,
D
whereas samples from the Kounrad and Aktogai deposits fall within the “adakite”
PT E
field. True adakites are characterized by low Sc (<10 ppm) and high Zr/Sm (>50 ppm) contents (Defant and Drummond, 1990, 1993). The geochemical characteristics of
CE
rocks from the Shiwu (Zr/Sm = 13–54; geomean = 35), Jiamantieliek (Zr/Sm = 14–49;
AC
geomean = 25), and Baogutu (Sc = 14–25, geomean = 19; Zr/Sm = 7–56, geomean = 18) deposits are inconsistent with these criteria, indicating that these rocks are not true adakites. Following evidences suggest that rocks from the Shiwu, Jiamantieliek, and Baogutu deposits may have undergone melting–assimilation–storage–homogenization (MASH) processes. First, the samples do not exhibit negative Eu, Ba, and Sr anomalies (Fig. 6a–f), and they fall along the “partial melting” line in Figure 11b and c, indicating that they did not undergo significant fractional crystallization and
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT therefore cannot reflect assimilation–fractional–crystallization (AFC) processes (Defant and Drummond, 1993; Richards and Kerrich, 2007). Second, Elliott et al (1997) indicates addition of aqueous fluids to the mantle wedge can significantly affect Ba/La, Ba/Nb and Pb/Ce ratios. In the West Junggar region, the Ba/La, Ba/Nb
PT
and Pb/Ce ratios of the PCDs are 6–82 (mainly >25, geomean=34), 22–334
RI
(mainly >110, geomean=132) and 0.05–1.39 (mainly >0.13, geomean=0.19), which
SC
are higher and more variable than those from MORB and OIB. Furthermore, hydrous mafic minerals such as amphibole and biotite occur within these deposits. These
NU
features suggest that the magma source interacted with hydrous fluids from the
MA
subducting slab and that the parent magma has high water contents. Water-rich magmas suppress the growth of plagioclase but promote amphibole crystallization,
D
resulting in magmas with high Sr/Y and low Y contents (Richards, 2011). Third, rocks
PT E
from the Shiwu, Jiamantieliek, and Baogutu deposits have variable Sr–Nd contents (Supplementary Material E) and O (Fig. 7a–g) and Hf (Fig. 8a–g) isotope
CE
compositions, suggesting that these magmas formed by crustal processes, which can
AC
result in variable isotope compositions (e.g., Brandon et al., 1993). Owing to their low densities, parent magmas that form within MASH zones will ascend towards the upper crust via dikes to form intrusive bodies and batholiths (Richards, 2003). Changes in the An and FeO contents of the plagioclase crystals may reflect different magmatic processes. Plagioclase crystals with little compositional variation (△An = 1–10) may be indicative of a closed system, whereas increased compositional variation (△An = 10–25) may reflect open-system behavior (Singer et
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT al., 1995). Furthermore, correlation between the An and FeO contents of the plagioclase may reflect recharging within an open system or magma mixing (Ruprecht and Worner, 2007). Plagioclase from the West Junggar region shows significant variation in An content and a positive relationship between An and FeO
PT
content (Fig. 4b), suggesting that the parent magmas formed by magma mixing and/or
RI
involved wall-rock contamination.
SC
6.3 Reasons for the difference in Cu reserve size
NU
The formation of porphyry deposits is a complex process that depends on many
MA
factors (Cooke et al., 2005; Wilkinson, 2013). Significant variation in the whole-rock trace element and zircon Hf and O isotope compositions of ore-related intrusions
D
within the North Balkhash–West Junggar Metallogenic Belt suggests that the PCDs
PT E
formed by different processes. Three significant differences, namely, inferred tectonic setting (Fig. 13b), crustal thickness (Fig. 12), and oxygen fugacity (Fig. 9), are
CE
identified between the North Balkhash and West Junggar regions. Previous studies
AC
have suggested that large–giant PCDs can form in both island-arc and continental-arc settings (e.g., Cooke et al., 2005, and references therein). Therefore, the tectonic setting cannot be the main reason for the observed difference in Cu reserves between the two regions. Previous work has suggested that thickened arcs may be conducive environments for the formation of large PCDs (Sillitoe, 2010; Cooke et al., 2005). Thickening of the crust (to >30 km) may facilitate sulfide accumulation in the lower crust or at the
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT crust–mantle boundary (Chiaradia, 2013). The accumulated copper sulfides will release the metals when they interact with oxidized magmas, subsequently forming large PCDs (Lee et al., 2012; Chiaradia, 2013). Geophysical studies (e.g., Li et al., 2014; Xu et al., 2016; Zhao et al., 2003) have investigated the region between the
PT
Tacheng Basin and Karamay–Urho Fault (Fig. 1c). Geophysical imaging has
RI
suggested that the Moho depth in this region is depressed from 40 to 45 km. We
SC
consider these geophysical data to be robust, but the inferred depth of the Moho at ca. 310 Ma is speculative because the region underwent vertical growth (crustal
NU
thickening) after subduction (Han et al., 2006). The Sm/Yb–La/Sm and Yb–La/Yb
MA
diagrams in Figure 12 were used to determine whether the North Balkhash and West Junggar regions can accumulate sulfides, and therefore whether these regions have the
D
potential to host large PCDs. The majority of samples from the North Balkhash region
PT E
formed at a higher pressure (Fig. 12) and higher K contents (Fig. 5b) compared with those from the West Junggar region. These features suggest that the North Balkhash
CE
region has greater potential than the West Junggar region to form large PCDs.
AC
Furthermore, thicker crust, resulting in higher temperatures in the lower crust, is conducive for the formation of long-lived MASH zones. Within these MASH zones, lower-crustal rocks are assimilated into mantle-derived magmas, causing the MASH zone to undergo high degrees of fractionation and voluminous acidic and volatile-rich magmatism (Anthony and Titley, 1988; Hildreth and Moorbath, 1988). Richards (2003) proposed that the magma supply rate is a crucial factor for sustained upper-crustal magmatism. MASH zones beneath thicker crust facilitate the formation
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT of shallow crust chambers because acidic and volatile-rich magmas have low viscosity and density, causing them to ascend. We therefore interpret the PCDs within the North Balkhash region to have been associated with more evolved and volatile-rich magmas than those in the West Junggar region, which was beneficial to
PT
the formation of large–giant PCDs.
RI
Previous studies have suggested that the saturation/elimination of sulfides during
SC
magmatism is closely related to the chalcophile elements contents (Lee et al., 2012; Sun et al., 2015) and that the transition from a sulfide- to sulfate-dominated
NU
environment occurs between FMQ and FMQ+2 (Jugo et al., 2005). Figure 4d and f
MA
reveal that the hydrous mafic minerals (e.g., biotite and amphibole) within the Shiwu, Baogutu, and Kounrad deposits have high oxygen fugacities that are higher than those
D
of the intrusive bodies emplaced before and after mineralization. These observations
PT E
suggest that the parent magmas associated with ore formation were oxidized (> NNO). However, some of mafic minerals have undergone variable degrees of hydrothermal
CE
alteration (SA figure 2) and therefore do not record their original/accurate
AC
compositions from the parent magma. Meanwhile, the Mg/Fe and Fe3+/Fe2+ of biotite in deposits are 0.93 to 3.35 (geomean=1.48) and 0.00 to 0.53 (geomean=0.21), respectively, also indicating they experienced different degrees of hydrothermal alteration (Beane, 1974). This is particularly the case for biotite and amphibole from the Baogutu (Fig. 4c) and Shiwu (Fig. 4e) deposits. Nonetheless, the majority of the data are considered to be reliable because they come from samples affected by only minor alteration. Zircon can provide a record of the composition of the parent magma
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT because it is relatively resistant to weathering and alteration (Ballard et al., 2002; Ferry and Watson, 2007). The zircon trace element compositions for samples from the North Balkhash region reveal that they have a higher oxygen fugacity than those from the West Junggar region (Fig. 9b). Samples from the barren Koldar Complex yielded
PT
the lowest oxygen fugacity, which is consistent with the lowest Cu reserves (actually
RI
no Cu reserves; Fig. 9c).
SC
Richards (2011) suggested that high magmatic water content is a prerequisite for the formation of magmatic–hydrothermal ore deposits and that oxygen fugacity also
NU
influences metal endowment. The ore-related intrusions within the PCDs investigated
MA
in this study contain amphibole and/or biotite and had magmatic water contents of >4 wt.% (refer to Section 5.1.3 and Fig. 14a), indicating that their parent magmas were
D
water rich; however, the barren Koldar Complex and intrusions that were emplaced
PT E
before and after mineralization in the Baogutu deposit exhibit these same characteristics (Fig. 4c and e). These observations suggest that although a high
CE
magmatic water content is an essential requirement, it is not the only factor
AC
controlling the formation of PCDs. The Koldar Complex has the highest water contents (Fig. 14a) but lowest oxygen fugacity (Fig. 9) comparing with other studied deposits, and therefore hydrothermal fluids were unable to transport metals and form a PCD. Williamson et al. (2016) suggested that excess Al (Al* > 1, Al* = (Al/(Ca + Na + K)–1)/0.01An) in plagioclase can distinguish fertile calc-alkaline systems from barren ones; however, this criterion could not be used in the present study, as many of the plagioclase phenocrysts from the ore-related intrusions yielded low Al* contents
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT (<1; Fig. 14b). This observation may reflect that PCDs in the North Balkhash region formed from high-K calc-alkaline magmas where K occupies the M-sites instead of Al (Williamson et al., 2016). The same observation for PCDs in the West Junggar region may relate to deposit size. Fertile systems in Williamson et al. (2016) are typically
PT
large–giant porphyry deposits. However, the Baogutu deposit, which is the largest
RI
PCD in the West Junggar region, contains only 0.63 Mt Cu and 14 t Au. It is possible
SC
that small PCDs such as the Baogutu deposit may form in normal systems and do not require a pre-concentration process, such as the presence of excess Al. However,
NU
further work is required to verify this hypothesis.
MA
Despite being a complex process, several conditions are necessary for the formation of large–giant PCDs. The first requirement is thicker crust. In thick crust,
D
arc-related magmas will become depleted in copper as a result of early sulfide and/or
PT E
magnetite crystallization, potentially forming a fertile metal source (Chiaradia, 2013; Sun et al., 2013). The second, and more important, requirement is high oxygen
CE
fugacity. Only a magma that is oxidized can remove metal from magmatic sulfides in
AC
the lower crust and then transport these sulfides from the deep mantle towards the upper crust. A high magmatic water content is also important, but it was not essential for the formation of PCDs in the North Balkhash–West Junggar region.
7. Conclusion Porphyry copper deposits (PCDs) within the North Balkhash–West Junggar Metallogenic Belt formed by different mechanisms. The parent magmas of intrusive
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT rocks within the PCDs were derived mainly from a juvenile lower-crustal source with mantle input. The parent magmas of intrusive rocks within the Shiwu deposit were also contaminated by sediments. Ore-related intrusions within the West Junggar region formed by MASH processes in an immature arc setting. This interpretation
PT
differs from that for PCDs within the North Balkhash region, which is inferred to
RI
have formed in a mature arc setting. A high magmatic water content is interpreted to
SC
be important, but not essential, for the formation of large PCDs. Thicker crust and oxidized magmas are crucial, resulting in the formation of enormous Cu reserves.
NU
These factors may account for the observed difference in Cu reserves between the
PT E
Acknowledgements
D
MA
North Balkhash and West Junggar regions.
We are very grateful to Editor-in-chief Xian-Hua Li and two anonymous
CE
reviewers for their constructive comments and assistance in improving manuscript.
AC
We thank Di Zhang for assistance with EMPA, Yue-Heng Yang for assistance with zircon Hf and trace elements analysis, Guo-Qiang Tang for assistance with zircon O isotope analysis. This work was granted by National Key R&D Program of China and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (2017YFC0601206, 41390442, 41772089, 2018YFC0604004, U1303293), and Open foundation of KLMR of Chinese Academy of Sciences (KLMR2017-16).
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
References Anthony, E. Y., Titley, S. R., 1988. Progressive mixing of isotopic reservoirs during magma genesis at the Sierrita porphyry copper deposit, Arizona: Inverse solutions.
PT
Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 52, 2235-2249.
RI
Ballard, J. R., Palin, J. M., Campbell, I. H., 2002. Relative oxidation states of magmas
SC
inferred from Ce(IV)/Ce(III) in zircon: Application to porphyry copper deposits of northern Chile. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology 144, 347-364.
NU
Beane, R. E., 1974. Biotite stability in the porphyry copper environment. Economic
MA
Geology 69, 241-256.
Bouvier, A., Vervoort, J. D., Patchett, P. J., 2008. The Lu-Hf and Sm-Nd isotopic
D
composition of CHUR: constraints from unequilibrated chondrites and implications
PT E
for the bulk composition of terrestrial planets. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 273, 48-57.
CE
Brandon, A. D., Hooper, P. R., Goles, G. G., Lambert, R. S. J., 1993. Evaluating
AC
crustal contamination in continental basalts: the isotopic composition of the Picture Gorge Basalt of the Columbia River Basalt Group. Contributions to Mineralogy & Petrology 114, 452-464. Cao, M. J., Qin, K. Z., Li, G. M., Yang, Y. H., Evans, N. J., Zhang, R., Jin, L. Y., 2014. Magmatic process recorded in plagioclase at the Baogutu reduced porphyry Cu deposit, western Junggar, NW-China. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences 82, 136-150. Cao, M. J., Li, G. M., Qin, K. Z., Evans, N. J., Seitmuratova, E., 2016a. Assessing the
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT magmatic affinity and petrogenesis of granitoids at the giant Aktogai porphyry Cu deposit, Central Kazakhstan. American Journal of Science 316, 614-668. Cao, M. J., Qin, K. Z., Li, G. M., Evans, N. J., Hollings, P., Jin, L. Y., 2016b. Genesis of ilmenite-series I-type granitoids at the Baogutu reduced porphyry Cu deposit,
PT
western Junggar, NW-China. Lithos 246-247, 13-30.
RI
Chauvel, C., Lewin, E., Carpentier, M., Arndt, N. T., Marini, J. C., 2008. Role of
SC
recycled oceanic basalt and sediment in generating the Hf-Nd mantle array. Nature Geoscience 1, 64-67.
NU
Chen, X. H., Seitmuratova, E., Wang, Z. H., Chen, Z. L., Han, S. Q., Li, Y., Yang, Y.,
MA
Ye, B. Y., Shi, W., 2014. SHRIMP U–Pb and Ar–Ar geochronology of major porphyry and skarn Cu deposits in the Balkhash Metallogenic Belt, Central Asia,
D
and geological implications. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences 79, 723-740.
PT E
Chiaradia, M., 2014. Copper enrichment in arc magmas controlled by overriding plate thickness. Nature Geoscience 7, 43-46.
CE
Cooke, D. R., Hollings, P., Walshe, J. L., 2005. Giant Porphyry Deposits:
AC
Characteristics, Distribution, and Tectonic Controls. Economic Geology 100, 801-818.
Defant, M. J., Drummond, M. S., 1990. Derivation of some modern arc magmas by melting of young subducted lithosphere. Nature 347, 662-665. Defant, M. J., Drummond, M. S., 1993. Mount St. Helens: Potential example of the partial melting of the subducted lithosphere in a volcanic arc. Geology 21, 547-550. Drummond, M. S., Defant, M. J., 1990. A model for Trondhjemite-Tonalite-Dacite
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Genesis and crustal growth via slab melting: Archean to modern comparisons. Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth 95, 21503-21521. Elliott, T., Plank, T., Zindler, A., White, W., Bourdon, B., 1997. Element transport from slab to volcanic front at the Mariana arc. Journal of Geophysical Research 102,
PT
14991-15019.
RI
Ferry, J. M., Watson, E. B., 2007. New thermodynamic models and revised
Mineralogy and Petrology 154, 429-437.
SC
calibrations for the Ti-in-zircon and Zr-in-rutile thermometers. Contributions to
NU
Frost, B. R., Barnes, C. G., Collins, W. J., Arculus, R. J., Ellis, D. J., Frost, C. D.,
MA
2001. A geochemical classification for granitic rocks. Journal of Petrology 42, 2033-2048.
D
Griffin, W. L., Wang, X., Jackson, S. E., Pearson, N. J., O'Reilly, S. Y., Xu, X. S.,
PT E
Zhou, X. M., 2002. Zircon chemistry and magmamixing, SE China: in-situ analysis of Hf isotopes, Tonglu and Pingtan igneous complexes. Lithos 61, 237-269.
CE
Han, B. F., Ji, J. Q., Song, B., Chen, L. H., Zhang, L., 2006. Late Paleozoic vertical
AC
growth of continental crust around the Junggar Basin, Xinjiang, China (Part I): Timing of post-collisional plutonism. Acta Petrologica Sinica 22, 1077-1086 (in Chinese with English abstract). Haschke, M., Günther, A., Melnick, D., Echtler, H., Reutter, K.J., Scheuber, E., Oncken, O., 2006. Central and Southern Andean Tectonic Evolution Inferred From Arc Magmatism. :pp. 337-353 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-48684-8_16. Hawkesworth, C. J., Gallagher, K., Hergt, J. M., McDermott, F., 1993. Mantle and
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT slab contributions in arc magmas. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences 21, 175-204. Heinhorst, J., Lehmann, B., Ermolov, P., Serykh, V., Zhurutin, S., 2000. Paleozoic crustal
growth
and
metallogeny
of
Central
Asia:
evidence
from
PT
magmatic-hydrothermal ore systems of Central Kazakhstan. Tectonophysics 328,
RI
69-87.
SC
Hildreth, W., Moorbath, S., 1988. Crustal contributions to arc magmatism in the Andes of Central Chile. Contributions to Mineralogy & Petrology 98, 455-489.
NU
Hoefs, J., 2009. Stable Isotope Geochemistry. Springer-Verlag, Berlin (286 pp).
MA
Hofmann, A. W., 1988. Chemical differentiation of the Earth: the relationship between mantle, continental crust, and oceanic crust. Earth & Planetary Science Letters 90,
D
297-314.
PT E
Hu, Y., Wang, J. L., Wang, J. Q., Ling, W. W., 2018. Origin of the Shiwu pluton in Barluk region, Xinjiang: Zircon U-Pb chronological, geochemical and Sr-Nd-Pb-Hf
AC
abstract).
CE
isotopic constraints. Acta Petrologica Sinica 34, 601-617 (in Chinese with English
Jugo, P. J., Luth, R. W., Richards, J. P., 2005. Experimental data on the speciation of sulfur as a function of oxygen fugacity in basaltic melts. Geochimica Et Cosmochimica Acta 69, 497-503. Kröner, A., Windley, B. F., Badarch, G., Tomurtogoo, O., Hegner, E., Jahn, B. M., Gruschka, S., Khain, E. V., Demoux, A., Wingate, M. T. D., 2007. Accretionary growth and crust-formation in the Central Asian Orogenic Belt and comparison
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT with the Arbian-Nubian shield. Memoir of the Geological Society of America 200, 461. Lee, C. T., Luffi, P., Chin, E. J., Bouchet, R., Dasgupta, R., Morton, D. M., Roux, V. L., Yin, Q. Z., Jin, D., 2012. Copper systematic in arc magmas and implications for
PT
crust-mantle differentiation. Science 336, 64-68.
RI
Li, C. H., Shen, P., Pan, H. D., Huang, W., Cao, C., Li, J., 2017a. Geology,
SC
ore-forming fluids and potential of Shiwu porphyry Cu-Au spot in West Junggar, Xinjiang. MINERAL DEPOSITS 36, 816-836 (in Chinese with English abstract).
NU
Li, C. H., Shen, P., Pan, H. D., Huang, W., Cao, C., 2017. Carboniferous porphyry
MA
Cu(-Au) mineralization of the West Junggar region, NW China: the Shiwu example. Interation Geology Review 59, 1175-1194.
D
Li, C. H., Shen, P., Pan, H. D., 2018a. Mineralogy of the Aktogai giant porphyry Cu
PT E
deposit in Kazakhstan: Insights into the fluid composition and oxygen fugacity evolution. Ore Geology Reviews 95, 899-916.
CE
Li, C. H., Shen, P., Pan, H. D., Cao, C., Seitmuratova, E., 2018b. Geology and
AC
ore-forming fluid evolution of the Aktogai porphyry Cu deposit, Kazakhstan. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences 165, 192-209. Li, G. M., Cao, M. J., Qin, K. Z., Hollings, P., Evans, N. J., Seitmuratova, E., 2016. Petrogenesis of ore-forming and pre/post-ore granitoids from the Kounrad, Borly and Sayak porphyry/skarn Cu deposits, Central Kazakhstan. Gondwana Research 37, 408-425. Li, X. H., Long, W. G., Li, Q. L., Liu, Y., Zheng, Y. F., Yang, Y. H., Chamberlain, K.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT R., Wan, D. F., Guo, C. H., Wang, X. C., Tao, H., 2010. Penglai Zircon Megacrysts: A Potential New Working Reference Material for Microbeam Determination of Hf-O Isotopes and U-Pb Age. Geostandards & Geoanalytical Research 34, 117-134. Li, X. H., Tang, G. Q., Gong, B., Yang, Y. H., Hou, K. J., Hu, Z. C., Li, Q. L., Liu, Y.,
PT
Li, W. X., 2013. Qinghu zircon: A working reference for microbeam analysis of
RI
U-Pb age and Hf and O isotopes. Chin Sci Bull, 58, 4647-4654.
SC
Li, Y. H., Gao, M. T., Wu, Q. J., 2014. Crustal thickness map of the Chinese mainland from teleseismic receiver functions. Tectonophysics 611, 51-60.
NU
McDonough, W. F., Sun, S. S., 1995. The composition of the Earth. Chemical
MA
Geology 120, 223-253.
Middlemost, E. A. K., 1994. Naming materials in the magma igneous rock system.
D
Earth Science Reviews 37, 215-224.
PT E
Patiňo Douce, A. E., 1999. What do experiments tell us about the relative contributions of crust and mantle to the origin of granitic magmas? In: Castro, A.,
CE
Fernandez, C., Vigneresse, J.L. (Eds.) Understanding Granites: Integrating New
AC
and Classical Techniques. Geological Society, London. Special Publications 168, 55-75.
Pearce, J. A., Harris, N. B. W., Tindle, A. G., 1984. Trace element discrimination diagrams for the tectonic interpretation of granitic rocks. Journal of Petrology 25, 956-983. Pearce, J. A., Peate, D. W., 1995. Tectonic implications of the composition of volcanic ARC magmas. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences 23, 251-285.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Peccerillo, A., Taylor, S. R., 1976. Geochemistry of Eocene calc-alkaline volcanic rocks from the Kastamonu area, northern Turkey. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology 58, 63-81. Plank, T., Langmuir, C. H., 1998. The chemical composition of subducting sediment
PT
and its consequences for the crust and mantle. Chemical Geology 145, 325-394.
RI
Rapp, R. P., Watson, E. B., 1995. Dehydration Melting of Metabasalt at 8-32 kbar:
SC
Implications for Continental Growth and Crust-Mantle Recycling. Journal of Petrology 36, 891-931.
NU
Rapp, R. P., Xiao, L., Shimizu, N., 2002. Experimental constraints on the origin of
MA
potassium-rich adakites in eastern China. Acta Petrologica Sinica 18, 293-302. Richards, J. P., 2003. Tectono-magmatic precursors for porphyry Cu-(Mo-Au) deposit
D
formation. Economic Geology 98, 1515-1533.
PT E
Richards, J. P., Kerrich, R., 2007. Adakite-like rocks: Their diverse origins and questionable role in metallogenesis. Economic Geology 102, 537-576.
CE
Richards, J. P., 2011. High Sr/Y arc magmas and porphyry Cu ± Mo ± Au deposits:
AC
Just add water. Economic Geology 106, 1075-1081. Ridolfi, F., Renzulli, A., Puerini, M., 2010. Stability and chemical equilibrium of amphibole in calc-alkaline magmas: an overview, new thermobarometric formulations and application to subduction-related volcanoes. Contributions to Mineralogy & Petrology 160, 45-66. Rudnick, R. L., Gao, S., 2003. Composition of the continental crust. Treatise on Geochemistry 3, 1-64.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Ruprecht, P., Wörner, G., 2007. Variable regimes in magma systems documented in plagioclase zoning patterns: El Misti stratovolcano and Andahua monogenetic cones. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research 165, 142-162. Salters, V. J. M., Stracke, A., 2004. Composition of the depleted mantle.
PT
Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2003GC000597.
RI
Seltmann, R., Porter, T. M., Pirajno, F., 2014. Geodynamics and metallogeny of the
Journal of Asian Earth Sciences 79, 810-841.
SC
central Eurasian porphyry and related epithermal mineral systems: A review.
NU
Sen, C., Dunn, T., 1994. Dehydration melting of a basaltic composition amphibolite at
MA
1.5 and 2.0 GPa: implications for the origin of adakites. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology 117, 394-409.
D
Sengör, A. M. C., Natal'in, B. A., Burtman, V. S., 1993. Evolution of the Altaid
PT E
tectonic collage and Palaeozoic crustal growth in Eurasia. Nature 364, 299-307. Shen, P., Shen, Y. C., Pan, H. D., Wang, J. B., Zhang, R., Zhang, Y. X., 2010. Baogutu
CE
Porphyry Cu-Mo-Au Deposit, West Junggar, Northwest China: Petrology,
AC
Alteration, and Mineralization. Economic Geology 105, 947-970. Shen, P., Pan, H. D., 2013. Country-rock contamination of magmas associated with the Baogutu porphyry Cu deposit, Xinjiang, China. Lithos 177, 451-469. Shen, P., Xiao, W. J., Pan, H. D., Dong, L. H., Li, C. F., 2013. Petrogenesis and tectonic settings of the Late Carboniferous Jiamantieliek and Baogutu ore-bearing porphyry intrusions in the southern West Junggar, NW China. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences 75, 158-173.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Shen, P., Pan, H. D., 2015. Methane origin and oxygen-fugacity evolution of the Baogutu reduced porphyry Cu deposit in the West Junggar terrain, China. Mineralium Deposita 50, 967-986. Shen, P., Hattori, K., Pan, H. D., Jackson, S., Seitmuratova, E., 2015. Oxidation
PT
Condition and Metal Fertility of Granitic Magmas: Zircon Trace-Element Data
RI
from Porphyry Cu Deposits in the Central Asian Orogenic Belt. Economic Geology
SC
110, 1861-1878.
Shen, P., Pan, H. D., Seitmuratova, E., 2017. Petrogenesis of the mineralized
NU
granitoids from the Kounrad and Borly porphyry Cu deposits and the East Kounrad
MA
porphyry Mo deposit in Kazakhstan: Implication for tectonic evolution and mineralization of the western part of the Central Asian Orogenic Belt. Lithos
D
s286-287, 53-74.
PT E
Shen, P., Pan, H. D., Hattori, K., Cooke, D. R., Seitmuratova, E., 2018. Large Paleozoic and Mesozoic porphyry deposits in the Central Asian Orogenic Belt:
CE
Geodynamic settings, magmatic sources, and genetic models. Gondwana Research
AC
58, 161-194.
Sillitoe, R. H., 2010. Porphyry copper systems. Economic Geology 105, 3-41. Singer, B. S., Dungan, M. A., Layne, G. D., 1995. Textures and Sr, Ba, Mg, Fe, K, and Ti compositional profiles in volcanic plagioclase: clues to the dynamics of calc-alkaline magma chambers. American Mineralogist 80, 776-798. Söderlund, U., Patchett, P. J., Vervoort, J. D., Isachsen, C. E., 2004. The 176 Lu decay constant determined by Lu-Hf and U-Pb isotope systematics of Precambrian mafic
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT intrusions. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 219, 311-324. Sun, S. S., McDonough, W. F., 1989. Chemical and isotopic systematics of oceanic basalts: implications for mantle composition and processes. In: Saunders, A.D., Norry, M.J. (Eds.), Magmatism in Ocean Basins. Special Publication. Geological
PT
Society of London, pp. 313-345.
RI
Sun, W. D., Liang, H. Y., Ling, M. X., Zhan, M. Z., Ding, X., Zhang, H., Yang, X. Y.,
SC
Li, Y. L., Ireland, T. R., Wei, Q. R., Fan, W. M., 2013. The link between reduced porphyry copper deposits and oxidized magmas. Geochimica Et Cosmochimica
NU
Acta 103, 263-275.
MA
Sun, W. D., Huang, R. F., Li, H., Hu, Y. B., Zhang, C. C., Sun, S. J., Zhang, L. P., Ding, X., Li, C. Y., Zartman, R. E., Ling, M. X., 2015. Porphyry deposits and
D
oxidized magmas. Ore Geology Reviews 65, 97-131.
PT E
Tang, G. Q., Li, X. H., Li, Q. L., Liu, Y., Ling, X. X., Yin, Q. Z., 2015. Deciphering the physical mechanism of the topography effect for oxygen isotope measurements
CE
using a Cameca IMS-1280 SIMS. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry
AC
30, 950-956.
Trail, D., Watson, E. B., Tailby, N. D., 2012, Ce and Eu anomalies in zircon as proxies for oxidation state of magmas. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 97, 70-87. Valley, J. W., Lackey, J. S., Cavosie, A. J., Clechenko, C. C., Spicuzza, M. J., Basei, M. A. S., Bindeman, I. N., Ferreira, V. P., Sial, A. N., King, E. M., Peck, W. H., Sinha, A. K., Wei, C. S., 2005. 4.4 billion years of crustal maturation: oxygen isotope ratios of magmatic zircon. Contributions to Mineralogy & Petrology 150,
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 561-580. Williamson, B. J., Herrington, R. J., Morris, A., 2016. Porphyry copper enrichment linked to excess aluminium in plagioclase. Nature Geoscience 9, 237-242. Wilkinson, J. J., 2013. Triggers for the formation of porphyry ore deposits in
PT
magmatic arcs. Nature Geoscience 6, 917-925.
RI
Wu, F. Y., Yang, Y. H., Xie, L. W., Yang, J. H., Xu, P., 2006. Hf isotopic compositions
SC
of the standard zircons and baddeleyites used in U-Pb geochronology. Chemical Geology 234, 105-126.
NU
Xu, Y. X., Yang, B., Zhang, S., Liu, Y., Zhu, L. P., Huang, R., Chen, C., Li, Y. T., Luo,
MA
Y. H., 2016. Magnetotelluric imaging of a fossil paleozoic intraoceanic subduction zone in western Junggar, NW China. Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth
D
121, 4103-4117.
PT E
Yuan, H. L., Gao, S., Liu, X. M., Li, H. M., Günther, D., Wu, F. Y., 2004. Accurate U-Pb Age and trace element determinations of zircon by laser ablation-inductively
AC
353-370.
CE
coupled plasma-mass spectrometry. Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research 28,
Zhao, J. M., Liu, G. D., Lu, Z. X., Zhang, X. K., Zhao, G. Z., 2003. Lithospheric structure and dynamic processes of the Tianshan orogenic belt and the Junggar Basin. Tectonophysics 376, 199-239. Zvezdov, V. S., Migachev, I. F., Girfanov, M. M., 1993. Porphyry copper deposits of the CIS and the models of their formation. Ore Geology Reviews 7, 511-549.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Figure Captions Figure 1. (a) Simplified map of Central Asian Orogenic Belt (CAOB) and locations of giant PCDs (after Shen et al., 2015). (b) Simplified geological map of the Central and Eastern Kazakhstan and
PT
the West Junggar (after Shen et al., 2017). (c) Simplified geological map of the West Junggar
SC
RI
region (after Li et al., 2017).
Figure 2. Simplified geological map of the (a) Shiwu Cu-Au deposit (after Li et al., 2017), (b)
NU
Jiamantieliek Cu deposit (after shen et al., 2013), and (c) Baogutu Cu-Au deposit (after Shen et al.,
MA
2010).
D
Figure 3. Simplified geological map of the (a1-3) Kounrad Cu, and (b1-3) Aktogai Cu deposits.
PT E
(a-1) Geological, (a-2) hydrothermal alteration, and (a-3) hypogene mineral zoning map of the Kounrad Cu deposit modified after Zvezdov et al (1993) and Seltmann et al (2014). (b-1)
CE
Geological, (b-2) geological of NE-SW oriented section, and (b-3) hydrothermal alteration and
AC
hypogene mineral zoning map of the Aktogai Cu deposit modified after Zvezdov et al (1993) and Seltmann et al (2014).
Figure 4. (a) Plagioclase plot in Or-An-Ab diagram. (b) An-FeO diagram of plagioclase. (c) (Fe2++Mn)-Mg-(AlVI+Fe3++Ti) diagram of biotite. (d) Mg-Fe3+-Fe2+ diagram of biotite. (e) Si-Mg/(Mg+Fe2+) diagram of amphibole. (f) T-(-logfO2) diagram. Note: Green circles stand for quartz diorite porphyry from the Shiwu deposit, yellow-green circles stand for tonalite porphyry
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT from the Shiwu deposit.
Figure 5. Whole rocks major elements diagram. (a) SiO2-(Na2O+K2O) (TAS) diagram (Middlemost, 1994). (b) SiO2-K2O diagram (Peccerillo and Taylor, 1976). (c) SiO2-Mg# diagram.
PT
(d) SiO2-Fe2O3T/(Fe2O3T+MgO) diagram (Frost et al., 2001). Note: Green circles stand for quartz
RI
diorite porphyry from the Shiwu deposit, yellow-green circles stand for tonalite porphyry from the
SC
Shiwu deposit.
NU
Figure 6. Whole rocks trace elements diagram. (a, c, e, g, i) Chondrite normalized REE patterns
MA
diagram, chondrite REE values from McDonough and Sun (1995). (b, d, f, h, j) Primitive mantle normalized trace element spider diagram, primitive mantle trace elements values from Sun and
PT E
D
McDonough (1989).
Figure 7. Zircon δ18O (a-d) and calculated melt δ18O (e-h) of the Shiwu, Baogutu, Kounrad, and
CE
Aktogai deposit. Melt δ18O calculated by δ18Owhole rock ≈ δ18Ozircon+0.0612×SiO2(wt%)-2.5 (Valley
AC
et al., 2005), SiO2 used average values of whole rocks major elements mentioned in section 5.2.
Figure 8. Calculated εHf(t) (a-d) and T2DM(Hf) (e-h) of the Shiwu, Baogutu, Kounrad, and Aktogai deposit. Formation ages of quartz diorite porphyry and tonalite porphyry from the Shiwu deposit used 310.1Ma and 310.4Ma, respectively (Li et al., 2017). Formation age of diorite from the Baogutu deposit used 313Ma (Shen et al., 2013). Other deposits’ formation ages are consistent with data source.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Figure 9. Zircon trace elements diagram. (a) Eu/Eu*-Ce4+/Ce3+ diagram. (b) 104/T(K)-Ce4+/Ce3+ diagram (Trail et al., 2012). (c) Cu(Mt)-Ce4+/Ce3+ diagram. Note: Green circles stand for quartz diorite porphyry from the Shiwu deposit, yellow-green circles stand for tonalite porphyry from the
RI
PT
Shiwu deposit.
SC
Figure 10. Zircon Hf-O isotopes two components mixing model. Two components include deleted mantle (Salters and Stracke, 2004) and subducted oceanic sediment (Chauvel et al., 2008; Hoefs,
NU
2009). Note: Green circles stand for quartz diorite porphyry from the Shiwu deposit, yellow-green
MA
circles stand for tonalite porphyry from the Shiwu deposit.
D
Figure 11. (a) Whole rock (Al2O3+TFe2O3+MgO+TiO2-Al2O3)/(TFe2O3+MgO+TiO2) diagram
PT E
(Patiňo Douce, 1999). (b) Whole rock La-La/Sm diagram. (c) Whole rock Zr-Nb/Zr diagram.
CE
Figure 12. (a) Whole rock Sm/Yb-La/Sm diagram (Haschke et al., 2006). (b) Whole rock
AC
Yb-La/Yb diagram (after Shen et al., 2018).
Figure 13. (a) Whole rock Nb+Y-Rb diagram (Pearce et al., 1984). (b) Whole rock Nb/Yb-Th/Yb diagram (Pearce and Peate, 1995). (c) Whole rock Y-Sr/Y diagram (Defant and Drummond, 1990, 1993). (d) Whole rock Ybn-(La/Yb)n diagram (Drummond and Defant, 1990).
Figure 14. (a) H2Omagmatic-Al*plagioclase diagram. The magmatic H2O content calculated by
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT amphibole through Ridolfi et al (2010), different symbols stand for average values of rocks, and lines stand for values variations. (b) An-Al/(Na+K+Ca) of plagioclase, “Barren field” and “Fertile field” according to Williamson et al (2016). Note: Green circles stand for quartz diorite porphyry
AC
CE
PT E
D
MA
NU
SC
RI
PT
from the Shiwu deposit, yellow-green circles stand for tonalite porphyry from the Shiwu deposit.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Highlights (1) Sources of PCDs in the West Junggar region are principally juvenile lower crust and form in the normal crust. (2) Thicken crust and higher oxygen fugacity are crucial factors resulting in
AC
CE
PT E
D
MA
NU
SC
RI
PT
significant reserves difference.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14
Figure 15