Coprologically diagnosing Anoplocephala perfoliata in the presence of A. magna

Coprologically diagnosing Anoplocephala perfoliata in the presence of A. magna

Accepted Manuscript Title: Coprologically diagnosing Anoplocephala perfoliata in the presence of A. magna Author: Alejandro Boh´orquez Ar´anzazu Meana...

436KB Sizes 0 Downloads 39 Views

Accepted Manuscript Title: Coprologically diagnosing Anoplocephala perfoliata in the presence of A. magna Author: Alejandro Boh´orquez Ar´anzazu Meana N´elida F. Pato M´onica Luz´on PII: DOI: Reference:

S0304-4017(14)00232-5 http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.vetpar.2014.04.023 VETPAR 7230

To appear in:

Veterinary Parasitology

Received date: Revised date: Accepted date:

20-12-2013 16-4-2014 21-4-2014

Please cite this article as: Boh´orquez, A., Meana, A., Pato, N.F., Luz´on, M.,Coprologically diagnosing Anoplocephala perfoliata in the presence of A. magna, Veterinary Parasitology (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2014.04.023 This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

1

30

Alejandro Bohórquez1, Aránzazu Meana1, Nélida F. Pato2, Mónica Luzón1* 1

ip t

Departamento de Sanidad Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Avenida de Puerta de Hierro s/n, 28040 Madrid, España. 2 Hospital Clínico Veterinario, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad Alfonso X El Sabio, Avenida Universidad 1, Villanueva de la Cañada, 28691 Madrid, España.

cr

* Corresponding author. Tel.: +34 3943948; fax: +34 91 3943908. E-mail address: [email protected] (M. Luzón).

d

M

an

us

Abstract Current copro-diagnostic tests for Anoplocephala perfoliata show high variation in their sensitivity and given the morphological similarity of Anoplocephala spp. eggs, this could be related to the presence of Anoplocephala magna alone or co-existing with A. perfoliata. In the present study, coprology was significantly more sensitive (p < 0.01) at detecting A. magna than A. perfoliata. This difference was independent of the parasite burden and was greater when testing was limited to horses with mature or gravid tapeworms. A. magna infection was strongly linked to young horses (≤ 2 years). The eggs of A. magna are smaller. Using 15 μm and 70 µm cut-offs for oncosphere diameter and the major shell bisector length, respectively, the eggs of A. perfoliata were identified with 100% sensitivity, 97% specificity and 98% sensitivity, 84% specificity. The use of these two morphometric variables would therefore be useful for the coproidentification of A. perfoliata in countries where both species coexist. Keywords: Sensitivity; specificity; copro-diagnosis; Anoplocephala perfoliata; Anoplocephala magna; host-age distribution.

Introduction

te

29

Coprologically diagnosing Anoplocephala perfoliata in the presence of A. magna

Ac ce p

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Anoplocephala perfoliata (Cyclophyllidea, Anoplocephalidae) is a common

31

intestinal tapeworm that affects horses worldwide. Mounting evidence suggests that A.

32

perfoliata is responsible for several intestinal disorders (review by Gasser et al., 2005),

33

and its accurate detection is crucial for both clinical and epidemiological purposes.

34

Currently available diagnostic methods are based on the assumption that A. perfoliata is

35

the only epidemiologically significant tapeworm to parasitize domestic horses.

36

However, this assumption does not hold true in countries such as USA or Spain. In

37

USA, Anoplocephala magna, a cestode of limited pathogenicity, is at least as prevalent

38

as A. perfoliata, (Lichtenfels, 1975). In Spain, since the first detection of A. magna in

39

abattoirs in northern and central regions (Meana et al., 2002), this cestode has been

Page 1 of 18

2 40

frequently detected throughout the country, although with different seasonality from A.

41

perfoliata (Meana et al., 2005). To improve the diagnosis of A. perfoliata infection, several methods have been

43

developed including the detection of parasite eggs in faeces using improved

44

centrifugation and flotation techniques, though these methods have shown considerable

45

variation in their sensitivity: from 40 – 62% (Gasser et al., 2005) to 75% (Rebhein et

46

al., 2010). Besides differences inherent to each technique, some factors that could

47

contribute to this variability are the intensity of infection, the irregular shedding of

48

proglottids or the maturity state of the tapeworms, but the possibility of

49

infection/coinfection with A. magna, should also be considered.

an

us

cr

ip t

42

Thus, in areas where both these two Anoplocephala species coexist, the copro-

51

diagnosis of equine cestodoses has been hindered because of the morphological

52

similarity between the eggs of the two species. The information on shell diameter is

53

scarce and applicable to A. perfoliata (65-80 µm, see reviews by Soulsby, 1987;

54

Tarazona Vilas, 1999; Gasser et al., 2005) but not to A. magna. According to different

55

reviews, the eggs of A. magna are either smaller (50 – 60 µm in Soulsby, 1987) or

56

larger (70 – 80 µm in Tarazona Vilas, 1999) than those of A. perfoliata. The limited

57

data on the oncosphere indicates a larger diameter for A. perfoliata (16 µm) than A.

58

magna (8 µm) (Tarazona Vilas, 1999).

d

te

Ac ce p

59

M

50

The differences in pathogeny and ecology between both tapeworm species

60

justify the necessity of differential diagnostic methods. In order to evaluate the

61

reliability and accuracy of the copro-diagnosis in the detection of A. perfoliata in the

62

presence of A. magna, the sensitivity of the copro-diagnosis of A. perfoliata and A.

63

magna was examined in horses identified by necropsy as positive for Anoplocephala

64

spp. as single or double infections. The distribution of each species according to the age

Page 2 of 18

3 65

and sex of the host was also examined. Finally, the reliability of two morphometric

66

variables (major shell bisector length and oncosphere diameter) for the identification of

67

eggs of both Anoplocephala species was assessed.

Materials and Methods

70

1. Sensitivity of coprology as a diagnostic test

cr

69

ip t

68

The digestive tracts of horses slaughtered in Spain were dissected and 130,

72

classified as positive for Anoplocephala spp. infection by visual inspection, used as the

73

reference standard. All cestodes recovered from each digestive tract were fixed in 70%

74

ethanol for their identification and recording of tapeworm burdens. Faeces were taken

75

directly from the rectum of each infected animal and 40 g analyzed by the

76

sedimentation/flotation method described by Meana et al. (1998) to detect

77

Anoplocephala spp. eggs. The sensitivity of coprology as a diagnostic test was then

78

calculated for each Anoplocephala species.

te

d

M

an

us

71

The stage of infection of each horse was also established according to

80

morphological criteria. For A. perfoliata, tapeworms were classified as “immature”

81

(lancet-shaped) versus “mature” (triangular-shaped) according to Schuster (1991). For

82

A. magna, small (< 9 cm long) uniformly shaped tapeworms were defined as

83

“immature” as compared to longer “mature” tapeworms with wider, mostly darker,

84

terminal segments. The sensitivity of coprology as a diagnostic test was also calculated

85

for each species using the horses with mature tapeworms as the reference standard.

Ac ce p

79

86

The presence of eggs in terminal proglottids of tapeworms classified as “mature”

87

was investigated in a group of horses with a low parasite burden (< 30 tapeworms). The

88

sensitivity of coprology was also calculated for each species using the horses with

Page 3 of 18

4 89

gravid tapeworms as the reference standard. Statistical analyses of sensitivities were

90

performed by the Chi squared test.

91 2. Host distribution of species

ip t

92

Of the 130 animals selected as positive for Anoplocephala spp., only 94 animals

94

could be identified by sex (45 males and 49 females) and age (66 young, i.e. ≤ 2-years-

95

old, and 28 adults, i.e. >2-years-old) as the slaughterhouses records were not always

96

accessible. Of these, animals with a single infection (n = 43 A. perfoliata and n = 29 A.

97

magna) were selected to establish the distribution of species according to host age or

98

sex.

an

us

cr

93

100

M

99 3. Egg morphology

Anoplocephala eggs were collected from about 10 specimens of each

102

Anoplocephala spp., in both cases coming from more than two animals, in order to

103

increase the quality of the samples representation. The last gravid segment of each

104

tapeworm was sectioned across the rear transverse line with a scalpel, and the eggs

105

collected by shaking the sectioned segments inside Eppendorf® tubes (volume 1.5 ml)

106

filled with tap water. For each species, the contents collected from different tapeworms

107

were mixed together.

te

Ac ce p

108

d

101

Under a light microscope (Nikon), 100 eggs of each species were examined at a

109

magnification of x400 to obtain two measurements: a) the diameter of the oncosphere,

110

and b) the length of the major shell bisector (Figure 1). The sensitivity (Se) and

111

specificity (Sp) of each morphometric character to identify each Anoplocephala species

112

were calculated by selecting an optimal cut-off for each measurement based on the ROC

113

(Receiver Operating Characteristic) curve (Noordhuizen et al., 1997). Briefly, the ROC

Page 4 of 18

5 curve displays the relationship between the true positive fraction (Se) and the false

115

positive fraction (1-Sp) over the range of possible cut-off values. In the ROC analysis,

116

the optimal cut-off value is that with “sensitivity plus specificity” (Se + Sp) at a

117

maximum. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) is a measurement of the validity of

118

the analysis, with a value of 1 representing the perfect analysis. These calculations were

119

carried out using the “Threshold value of a diagnostic test” option of Win Episcope 2.0.

cr

ip t

114

Results

122

1. Sensitivity of coprology as a diagnostic test

an

121

us

120

Tapeworm burdens, infecting parasites and coprological results are provided in

124

Table 1. Sixty four animals harboured A. perfoliata and 35 animals harboured A. magna

125

as a single infection, while 35 animals harboured both Anoplocephala spp. infections.

126

Tapeworm burdens were mostly low (1-30 tapeworms) for both species (68% A.

127

perfoliata and 89% A. magna). High A. perfoliata burdens (> 100 tapeworms) were in

128

the ranges 115 – 396 in single infections and 138 – 1,113 in double infections, whereas

129

A. magna burdens were 130 – 170 in double infections. The diagnostic sensitivities of

130

coprology were 11% and 51% respectively for A. perfoliata and A. magna in single

131

infections and 58% in double infections. Considering single and double infections

132

together, sensitivities were 26% for A. perfoliata and 55% for A. magna. Statistical

133

analysis indicated a significantly higher (p<0.01) sensitivity to detect A. magna than A.

134

perfoliata when comparing both single and single plus double infections. For both

135

species, low tapeworm burdens predominated over moderate (31 – 100 tapeworms) or

136

high burdens in animals returning a positive coprology test.

Ac ce p

te

d

M

123

137

As shown in Table 2, in the subset of horses with mature tapeworms, sensitivity

138

was significantly lower (p<0.01) in animals parasitized with A. perfoliata (15%) than

Page 5 of 18

6 139

with A. magna (75%). Similar results were obtained in animals harbouring gravid

140

tapeworms (20% vs 79%, p < 0.01).

141 2. Host distribution of species

ip t

142

The presence of A. magna as a single infection (n = 29) was significantly

144

associated (p < 0.01) with host age (90% young, n = 26 vs 10% adults, n = 3). These

145

results differed significantly (p < 0.01) from those recorded for single A. perfoliata

146

infections (n = 43) (53% foals, n = 23 vs 47% adults, n = 20) in which no age

147

association was observed. Only three adult females harboured A. magna as a single

148

infection; of them, one was a pregnant mare at the time of necropsy and other mare had

149

foaled six months earlier. No host sex predilection was observed of either species (A.

150

perfoliata: 40% males, n = 17 vs 60% females, n = 26; A magna: 52% males, n = 15 vs

151

48% females, n = 14).

d

M

an

us

cr

143

Of the subset of animals showing A. magna as a double infection (22 animals

153

that were excluded from the host distribution analysis), five were adults (3 females and

154

2 males).

Ac ce p

155

te

152

156

3. Identification according to egg morphology

157

3.a. Oncosphere diameter (Figure 1, a)

158

As shown in Table 3, the oncosphere diameter of the A. perfoliata eggs

159

examined ranged from 15 to 25 µm (mean ± SD 17.78 ± 1.28), with a mode of 17.5 µm

160

(84% of A. perfoliata eggs). For A. magna eggs, oncosphere diameters were 10 to 17.5

161

µm (mean ± SD 12.21 ± 1.34), with a mode of 12.5 µm (44% of A. magna eggs). In

162

100% of A. perfoliata eggs, oncospheres were ≥ 15 µm whereas in 97% of A. magna

163

eggs they were < 15 µm. According to the ROC analysis, the optimal threshold to

Page 6 of 18

7 distinguish between A. perfoliata and A. magna eggs was a diameter of 15 µm. Using

165

this cut-off, eggs of A. perfoliata would be distinguished from A. magna with a

166

sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 97% (Figure 2). The AUC was 0.99 (95% C.I.:

167

0.98 – 0.99), indicating high accuracy.

ip t

164

168 3.b. Major shell bisector length (Figure 1, b)

cr

169

As shown in Table 3, the A. perfoliata egg shell’s major bisector was 65 – 112.5

171

µm long (mean ± SD 80.63 ± 8.14) with values in the range 77.5 – 85 µm showing

172

highest frequencies (58% of the eggs). Lengths for A. magna ranged from 57.5 to 75

173

µm (mean ± SD 65.06 ± 3.94), and the highest frequency range was 62.5 – 67.5 µm

174

(52% of the eggs). In 98% of A. perfoliata eggs, shell bisectors were ≥ 70 µm, whereas

175

in 84% of A. magna eggs they were < 70 µm. According to the ROC analysis, 70 µm

176

was selected as the optimal cut-off bisector length to distinguish between the eggs of A.

177

perfoliata and A. magna with a sensitivity of 98% and specificity of 84% (Figure 3).

178

The AUC was 0.97 (95% C.I.: 0.96 – 0.98), indicating high accuracy.

180 181

an

M

d

te

Ac ce p

179

us

170

Discussion

This study reveals that as a diagnostic test, coprology is significantly more

182

sensitive to detect A. magna than A. perfoliata. This difference was independent of the

183

tapeworm burden since low burdens of both Anoplocephala spp. were predominant in

184

animals testing positive by coprology. The higher sensitivity of the test observed here

185

for A. magna over A. perfoliata was even more evident in horses parasitized with

186

mature or gravid tapeworms. Using this sample, any possible biases due to an immature

187

tapeworm stage were ruled out. The most likely explanation for it is the larger size of A.

188

magna, whose long strobila is made up of wide segments that break-off in groups when

Page 7 of 18

8 gravid. In contrast, A. perfoliata is much smaller and its gravid proglottids form and

190

break away at a much slower rate. Another finding of this study was the preference

191

shown by A. magna for young (≤ 2 years) horses. Thus, 90% of single infections by A.

192

magna were detected in young animals. Only three adult females were parasitized by A.

193

magna as a single infection, one of them being pregnant and other a postparturient

194

mare. Tapeworm infections have been related to host age in other Anoplocephalidae

195

infections such as those of cattle with Moniezia spp. (Ramajo Martín and Muro Álvarez,

196

1999). Although more work is needed, the finding of A. magna infection in young

197

animals and pregnant/postparturient mares could be related to factors associated to

198

young age or pregnancy.

an

us

cr

ip t

189

The higher coprological sensitivity detected towards A. magna and the strong

200

preference shown by this species for young animals mean that past epidemiological

201

studies have probably overestimated the prevalence of A. perfoliata in areas where both

202

occur, especially those performed in young horses, given the morphological similarity

203

of Anoplocephala spp. eggs.

d

te

Despite the morphological similarity of the eggs, the morphometric analysis

Ac ce p

204

M

199

205

revealed differences in the oncosphere diameter and major shell bisector length. In both

206

cases, measurements were larger for A. perfoliata than A. magna. The difference in the

207

major shell bisector is in line with the description by Soulsby (1987), yet is inconsistent

208

with the findings of Tarazona Vilas (1999) who reported the similar or greater size of A.

209

magna eggs. As for the oncosphere diameter, the figures are consistent with data

210

provided by Tarazona Vilas (1999), although this author’s oncosphere measurements

211

for A. magna were smaller.

212

According to those morphometric data, both cut-offs, oncosphere diameter and

213

major shell bisector length, were assigned to distinguish the eggs of A. perfoliata from

Page 8 of 18

9 those of A. magna with high accuracy, especially with the oncosphere diameter cut-off.

215

The diagnostic implication of this finding is remarkable as no clear morphometric

216

differentiation had been reported so far. Control programs with an epidemiological basis

217

must rely on specific diagnoses. In this respect, current immunodiagnostic methods may

218

not discriminate between both Anoplocephala spp. (Bohórquez et al., 2012) and

219

possibly the identification will rely on molecular tools. For the moment, the use of these

220

two morphometric traits could help the coprological identification of A. perfoliata.

221

Despite its many limitations, in most laboratories coprology is still a routine technique

222

of diagnosing a parasite disease. Notwithstanding the demonstrated sensitivity problems

223

of the copro-diagnosis of A. perfoliata, we propose that this method would be especially

224

useful in young animals reared in countries like the USA or Spain where the

225

coexistence of both species has been demonstrated (Lichtenfels, 1975; Meana et al.,

226

2002, 2005).

d

M

an

us

cr

ip t

214

229 230 231 232 233 234

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that no competing interest exist.

Ac ce p

228

te

227

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Virbac, S.A. The authors thank M. Martínez-

Izquierdo for help with the microscopy measurements.

235

References

236

Bohórquez, A., Meana, A., Luzón, M. 2012. Differential diagnosis of equine cestodosis

237

based on E/S and somatic Anoplocephala perfoliata and Anoplocephala magna

238

antigens. Vet. Parasitol. 190, 87-94.

Page 9 of 18

10 239

Gasser, R.B., Williamson, R.M.C., Beveridge, I., 2005. Anoplocephala perfoliata of horses

240

– significant scope for further research, improved diagnosis and control.

241

Parasitology 131, 1-13.

243

Lichtenfels, J.R., 1975. Helminths of domestic equids. Proceedings of the

ip t

242

Helminthological Society of Washington, 42 (special issue). 92 pp.

Meana, A., Luzón, M., Corchero, J., Gómez-Bautista, M., 1998. Reliability of

245

coprological diagnosis of Anoplocephala perfoliata infection. Vet. Parasitol. 74,

246

79-83.

248

us

Meana, A., Mateos, A., Pato, N.F., Pérez, J., 2002. First report of Anoplocephala magna

an

247

cr

244

(Abildgaard, 1789) in Spain. Rev. Ibér. Parasitol. 3-4, 93-95. Meana, A., Pato, N.F., Martín, R., Mateos, A., Pérez-García, J., Luzón, M., 2005.

250

Epidemiological studies on equine cestodes in central Spain: Infection pattern

251

and population dynamics. Vet. Par. 30, 233-240.

d

M

249

Noordhuizen, J. P. T. M., Frankena, K., van der Hood, C.M., Graat, E.A.M., 1997.

253

Application of quantitative methods in veterinary epidemiology. Wageningen

254

Pers, Wageningen, The Netherlands. Pp. 445.

Ac ce p

te

252

255

Ramajo Martín, V., Muro Álvarez, A., 1999. Parasitosis de los rumiantes. Cestodosis

256

digestivas. In: Cordero del Campillo, M., Rojo Vázquez, F.A. (Eds.),

257

Parasitología Veterinaria. McGraw-Hill Interamericana, Madrid: 229-234.

258

Rebhein, S., Lindner, T., Visser, M., Winter, R., 2010. Evaluation of a double

259

centrifugation technique for the detection of Anoplocephla eggs in horse faeces.

260

J Helminthol. 1-6. Schuster, R., 1991. [Morphometric analysis of an

261

Anoplocephala perfoliata population]. Angewandte Parasitologie 32, 105-111.

262

[In German].

Page 10 of 18

11 263

Soulsby, E. J. L., 1987. Parasitología y enfermedades parasitarias en los animales

264

domésticos (1st ed. in Spanish, Translation of the 7th ed. in English). Ed.

265

Interamericana, Mexico. 823 pp. Tarazona Vilas, J. M., 1999. Parasitosis de los équidos. Cestodosis intestinales:

267

anoplocephalidosis. In: Cordero del Campillo, M., Rojo Vázquez, F.A. (Eds.),

268

Parasitología Veterinaria. McGraw-Hill Interamericana, Madrid: 540-545.

cr

ip t

266

Ac ce p

te

d

M

an

us

269

Page 11 of 18

12 269

Table 1. Tapeworm burdens and coprological results of 130 horses parasited by A.

270

perfoliata and A. magna as a single or double infection.

A.perfoliata

TAPEWORM BURDEN 1-30

31-100

> 100

TOTAL ANIMALS N=130

65 (17)+

17 (6) +

13 (2) +

95

COPROLOGICAL RESULTS FAECES + 25

SENSITIVITY

ip t

INFECTION

26%

single

double

59 (29) +

32 (15) +

27 (14) +

5 (1) +

4 (4) +

3 (3) +

3 (3) +

1 (1) +

31

(n)+: animals testing positive by coprology 

272

( )*: 95% Confidence Interval

3 (3) +

66

35

18

11%

(5 – 21)* 58% (40 – 75)*

36

55% (42 – 66)*

18

51% (34 – 69)*

31

18

58% (40 – 75)*

Ac ce p

271

273

0

7

us

7 (5) +

64

an

19 (12) +

8 (1) +

M

A. magna

10 (1) +

d

double

46 (5) +

te

single

cr

(18 – 36)*

Page 12 of 18

13 Table 2. Coprological results of 81 horses with mature tapeworms of A. perfoliata (n =

274

53) or A. magna (n = 28), as a single or double infection, and of 24 horses with gravid

275

tapeworms of A. perfoliata (n = 10) or A. magna (n = 14), as a single or double

276

infection. COPROLOGICAL RESULTS

NUMBER

FAECES

SENSITIVITY

ANIMALS

+

(95% C.I.)

Mature A.perfoliata

53

8

15% (7 – 27)

single

48

7

double*

5

1

Mature A. magna

28

21

single

25

18

double*

3

3

Gravid A.perfoliata

10

2

single

10

double*

0

Gravid A. magna

14

single

5

M

an

75% (55 – 89)

20% (3 – 52)

2

d

-

te

double*

cr

OF

us

INFECTION

ip t

273

9

11

79% (52 – 94)

4 7

(*): Animals with double Anoplocephala spp. infection but having only mature or gravid

278

tapeworms of the mentioned species.

279

 

280

 

281

 

282

Ac ce p

277

283 284 285

Page 13 of 18

14  Table 3. Results of measuring the oncosphere diameter (left) and the major shell

286

bisector (right) in 100 eggs of A. magna and 100 eggs of A. perfoliata. The black line

287

represents the optimal cut-off between A. perfoliata and A. magna values according to

288

the ROC analysis. Grey area below the black line represents false positive values. Green

289

area above the black line represents false negative values.

292

0

10

57.5

11.25

0

28

58.75

12.5

0

44

13.75

0

15

15

4

1

17.5

84

2

20

10

0

22.5

1

25

1

Number of eggs

A. perfoliata

A. magna 2

0

3

60

0

5

61.25

0

7

62.5

0

18

63.75

0

15

65

2

12

66.25

0

10

0

67.5

0

11

70

10

8

72

5

4

75

10

5

77.5

18

0

80

7

0

82.5

19

0

85

14

0

87.5

7

0

90

2

0

92.5

2

0

100

1

0

105

1

0

112.5

2

0

M

an

0

d

291

10

te

0

Ac ce p

290

bisector (µm)

A. perfoliata A. magna

cr

diameter (µm)

Major shell

Number of eggs

us

Oncosphere

ip t

285

Page 14 of 18

15 Figure captions

293

Figure 1. Egg of Anoplocephala spp., showing the oncosfere diameter (a) and the major

294

shell bisector (b).

295

Figure 2. Sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) for each potential cut-off value

296

oncosphere diameter to distinguish between A. perfoliata and A. magna eggs, obtained

297

from the observation of 100 eggs of each species.

298

Figure 3. Sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) for each potential cut-off value major

299

shell bisector to distinguish between A. perfoliata and A. magna eggs, obtained from the

300

observation of 100 eggs of each species.

an

us

cr

ip t

292

Ac ce p

te

d

M

301

Page 15 of 18

i

Figure

b a

Ac

ce pt

ed

M an

us

cr

Figure1

Page 16 of 18

cr

i

Figure

M an

us

Figure 2 1 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.8

ed

0.7 0.7

Se

ce pt

0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2

Sp

Ac

Se or Sp

0.6 0.6

0.1 0.1

0

10

11.75

12.5

13.75

15

17.5

20

22.5

25

Cut-off values (µm)

Page 17 of 18

cr

i

Figure

M an

us

Figure 3

11 0.9 0.8

ed

0.7 0.7

0.4

0.3 0.2

0.1

ce pt

0.5

Se Sp

Ac

Se or Sp

0.6

00

Cut-off values (µm) Page 18 of 18