DeepSea
Pergamon
PII: 60967-0645(!qwo10-6
Research II, Vol. 44, No. 6-7, pp. 144~1464, 1997 0 1997 Elsevier Science Ltd All rights reserved. Printed in Great Britain 0967-0615/97 $17.00+0.00
Core-top calibration of the alkenone index vs sea surface temperature in the Indian Ocean CORINNE SONZOGNI,* EDOUARD BARD,* FRAUKE ROSTEK,* RAYMOND LAFONT,* ANTON1 ROSELL-MELEtS and GEOFFREY EGLINTONfg (Received 16 June 1995; accepted 3 1 December 1996)
Abstract-The alkenone index (UK 37) has been calibrated against sea surface temperature (SST) using a suite of 54 surface sediments from the Indian Ocean (20”N to 45”S), spanning temperatures between 6 and 29°C (0.2< Uxs7< 1.0). A computerized oceanographic atlas has been used to calculate modern SST for the coring sites. We have constructed two sets of l_lxs~_SST calibrations for various water depths between 10 and 50 m. The first set is based on the comparison of UK’s7with annual mean temperatures for all cores. In the second set, we assume that UK’s7 values in surface sediments are linked to seasonal productivity patterns, and UK37 is compared with mean temperatures at times of yearly production maximum. In both calibrations, the Ur“s, values are strongly correlated with SST, with a best fit obtained using temperatures from 10 m and seasonal productivity patterns. The regression line is similar to that found with laboratory cultures of E. huxleyi, and with other calibrations based on recent sediments from other oceans. Above 24°C the slope of our Uxs&ST relationship is smaller (approximately 0.020 Uxs7 unit ‘C-‘) than the general slope (approximately 0.033). 0 1997 Elsevier Science Ltd
INTRODUCTION A series of long chain C+& di-, tri- and tetraunsaturated methyl and ethyl ketones (alkenones) has been identified in some species of Prymnesiophyceae algae, in particular in the ubiquitous marine coccolithophorid Emiliuniu huxleyi (Volkman et al., 1980a, Volkman et al., 1980b). The structures of these alkenones have been determined by De Leeuw et al. (1980) and Rechka and Maxwell (1988). Initially, Brassell et al. (1986b) defined the UK 37 ratio as an index of C3, methyl-ketones unsaturation: UK
[C37:2Mel - [C37:4Me1 37 = [C37:2Mel + [C37:3Mel + [C37:4Mel
As the C37:4 is rarely present in sediments, the equation has been simplified and the new index Ur37 is usually employed (Brassell et al., 1986b):
* CEREGE, University d’Aix-Marseille III et CNRS-FR 6094 et UMR 6536, Europole de I’Arbois, BP 80, 13545 Aix-en-Provence cdx 4, France. t Organic Geochemistry Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 ITS, U.K. $ Also at Biogeochemistry Centre, University of Bristol, Bristol, U.K. 4 Present address: Fossil Fuels and Environmental Geochemistry, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, U.K. 1445
1446
C. Sonzogni
et ul.
[C37:2Me1 UK’ s7 = [C37:2Me1 + [C37:3Me1 The unsaturation ratios for the Cs7 and Css alkenones are sensitive to growth temperature of the algae, as noted by Brassell et al. (1986a, Brassell et al., 1986b). These workers showed a correlation between planktonic ansO and UK’37 in a deep-sea core from Kane Gap, which suggested that UK’s7 could be used as an SST proxy. Laboratory cultures on E. huxleyi (Marlowe et al., 1984a, Marlowe et al., l984b; Prahl and Wakeham, 1987; Prahl et al., 1988) first showed that the UK’s7 index exhibits a linear response for water temperatures between 8 and 25°C. Some other coccolithophorids have similar properties, and recently Volkman et al. (1995) succeeded in culturing Gephyrocapsa oceanica, confirming the temperature dependence of their Cs7 and Css alkenones unsaturation ratios. However, the UK’37vs SST relationship deviates somewhat for mid- and low temperatures from the calibration obtained for E. huxleyi. Several workers have demonstrated that other alkenone ratios are not or less temperature dependent (Prahl et al., 1988; Conte et al., 1992; Rosell-Mel& et al., l994), which could be used to distinguish between different types of coccolithophorids (for example, the ratio of C37/C38) (Marlowe et al., 1990; Rosell-MelC et al., 1994; Volkman et al., 1995). To assess the validity of the culture calibration to the open ocean, different calibrations have been constructed by analysing particulate organic matter (POM) from the water column or sediment traps (Prahl and Wakeham, 1987; Conte et al., 1992; Conte and Eglinton, 1993; Sikes and Volkman, 1993) and by extracting organic material from recent surface sediments (Sikes et al., 1991; Rosell-Mel& et al., 1994; Rosell-Mel& et al., 1995a). These studies also have shown that the UK 37 index correlates with SST, but the scatter is often larger than obtained with E. huxleyi cultures. The differences and scatter found between the calibrations based on POM and surface sediments may be partly explained by the contribution of different Prymnesiophyte algae belonging to different genera, species or even strains. Degradation of the total stock of alkenones occurs during sedimentation through diagenetic processes (Prahl et al., 1989). However, studies have shown that the unsaturation index is not significantly affected by sedimentary diagenesis (Prahl et al., 1989; Poynter and Eglinton, 1991; Sikes et al., 1991; Conte et al., 1992, Conte et al., 1995; Madureira et al., 1995), although the effect of water column diagenesis may be important at low SST (RosellMele et al., 1995a). In this paper, we present new data on alkenone distributions in recent sediments from the Indian Ocean, which are then compared with modern temperatures. Our objective is to test the UK’37vs SST relationship in an oceanic area hitherto not considered in previous studies. Hence, 54 surface sediments (20°N-45”S) are analysed that cover a large range of SST (6 29°C). EXPERIMENTAL Lipid extraction and analysis procedures The alkenone data used in this paper have been generated by the same analyst (C. Sonzogni) in two laboratories, OGU in Bristol and CEREGE in Aix-en-Provence. A semiautomated analytical procedure was used in Bristol, and has been described elsewhere (Rosell-MelC et al., 1995b). A similar manual procedure was used in Aix-en-Provence. Briefly, a C& n-alkane was added to the freeze-dried surface sediment (1 g) which is
Alkenone index vs sea surface temperature in Indian Ocean
1447
extracted with distilled CH$lz:CHsOH (2: 1, x 2) and CH&& ( x 1) by ultrasonication. The extracts were combined and washed with distilled water to remove sea salts and methanol, dried with preheated Na2S04 and rotary evaporated to dryness. The residue was redissolved in CH2C1z and cleaned by elution through a silica commercial cartridge (silica Bond Elut SPE column, Varian). The clean extract was concentrated under N2 and redissolved with CH2C12 (50 ~1) before gas chromatography (GC). Details on the analytical tests performed in Aix-en-Provence will be given elsewhere (Sonzogni, 1997). The chromatographic procedure used at CEREGE was performed on a 60 m x 0.25 mm x 0.1 urn non-polar fused silica capillary column DB-5-MS (J&W) fitted with a 2.5 m x 0.53 mm deactivated retention gap. A Fisons Instruments GC8065 gas chromatograph fitted with a cold on-column injector and flame ionization detector was used for routine analyses (HZ as carrier gas). The gas chromatograph oven was programmed from 45 to 200°C at 15°C min-‘, from 200 to 250°C at 50” min-’ and from 250 to 300°C at 3” min-’ . The final temperature was then maintained for 30 min. Alkenones and alkenoates typically elute between 39 and 44 min, and the C37:3Meand the C&M~ are well separated (approximately 20 s). The chromatograms of the sample extracts were compared with relative retention times of the C 37.3~eand the Cs7:zMestandards, synthesized by Rechka and Maxwell (1988). The alkenones and the alkenoates in the extracts were quantified using the ChromCard software (Fisons Instruments). The identification of compounds and verification of the absence of coelutions were performed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) on selected samples (Fisons Instruments MD800 GC-MS system). The accuracy and reproducibility of the above analytical procedures have been studied using mixtures of synthetic standards (Cse n-alkane, C16 and Cl9 methylketones commercially available and C 37.2~e and Cs,:s~~ alkenones provided by Professor J. R. Maxwell), algal cultures (Isochrysis galbana strain T. Iso.) used at the Division of Oceanography, CSIRO, Hobart, Australia, and provided by Dr J. Volkman), and homogenized sediment samples (South Atlantic sediments used as standards at the University of Bremen, Germany, and provided by Dr P. J. Mtiller). For the real precision is better than 0.01 UKs7 units sediment samples, the analytical (approximately 0.3”C), and the estimated accuracy is better than 0.02 UKs, unit (Sonzogni, 1997). Rosell-Mel& et al. (1995b) observed that the value of the UK37 changed with the alkenone concentration at extreme concentrations and suggested working within a restricted range of alkenone concentration (5-100 ng of Cg7 total). To assess the effect of the alkenone concentration on the unsaturation index, solutions of synthetic Cs7:s~~ and C37:ZMewith different ratios (1:25; 1:lO; 1:4; 2:5; 1:2; 1:1;4:3 and 4:l w/w Cs7:sr,.&37:2~e) and algal and sediment samples have been studied at different concentration (between 3 and 180 ng pl-’ of Cs, total alkenones). Figure l(a) and (b) shows the UK x7variations as a function of the Cs, total alkenones injected in the gas chromatograph. The entire interval of UKs7 is represented in these graphs. In the injection range between 10 and 200 ng of total Cs7, the Ups7 appears to be unaffected by the sample size (Fig. la and b). Indeed, the standard deviations on UKs7 vary between 0.0006 and 0.0016 for synthetic alkenones and 0.0020 and 0.0082 for algal and sediments samples. In addition, each solution of synthetic C 37.3~~and Cs7:zMewith different known ratios (1:25;1:10; 1:4; 1:2; 1:l; 4:3 and 4:l w/w C&s&C&& was injected five times in the gas chromatograph. Figure 2 represents the comparison between the measured value UKs7 and the theoretical UK’s7. The mean standard deviation of the five injection replicates is about
1448
C. Sonzogni et al.
(a) (.,:__,,,__________*_____________ ._-_ ~,wos 0.85-
_____
1:25 std
_____--++*++.+_i_,,a
c=o.cOo7 .~_~_~__~____~________~~__~~____~~?_~~_
0.75 -
0=0.0016 ,__e~~___-__*_________o-_____~~~~~ __~~0008_________-__*_*_.._--_~~~~t~_
fi r? 5
0.65 0..5.5-
l%LmM ____________-___-__,__,___-__!k?Cd_
FOOOlO 0.45-____-__________~__y_~.__-_-__~~~~~_ 0.35 -
us-
Synthetic
nlkenones
a=o.o015 ,___________-______f______,__4_:1”’6
0.15-r
I
I
0
20
40
I
I
I
I 4 120
Total C3?““alke%ned”(“,,,~g) 1.0, 0=0.0023 -&-_L-_---~_?_-_~_-_~_~_-~~_-&-_-&_-_-~ 0.9
U=O.C020
i
samples
Natural
0.8
0.7___r____*_p**_~2=0.0042____________ 0
1~0.0082 a________________________.
.____x_$ 0.6 -
a=o.c032 ~___----_______-____-_
___-m_+___*_ 0.5 -
0.4i
0
I
50
.
-I
I 100
150
200
Total C37 alkenones (ng) Fig. 1. The effect of the sample size on the U K’37values has been studied with (a) a series of synthetic alkenones at different proportions (1:25; 1:10; 1:4; 2:5; 1:2;1:1; 4:3; 4: 1 w/w C37:3~&37:2~~, and (b) algal and sediment samples (CSIRO, Isochrysis galbana strain T. Iso.; CC1025 and CC1027, homogenized South Atlantic sediment samples; 85681/l 5 cm and 85681/20 cm, Indian Ocean sediment samples). UK’37variations are shown as a function of the injected total C3, alkenones for an interval ranging between 3 and 180 ng. The mean UK’37(dashed lines) and the standard deviations (calculated for samples with total C37 higher than 10 ng) of the U K37values are also reported.
0.0010 UK37 unit (an order of magnitude better than the analytical precision reached on natural sediment samples). Figure 2 also shows the agreement between measured and predicted UK’3-,. Sampling
Samples were collected during several R.V. Marion Dufresne cruises covering a wide range of longitudes (40-95”E) and latitudes (20°N-45”S) (Fig. 3 and Appendix A). The sediments were taken using box corers, pilot corers and piston corers and stored in cool repositories at
Alkenone index vs sea surface temperature in Indian Ocean
0
0.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.9
1449
1
Calculated UK’37 Fig. 2. A series of synthetic alkenones with different relative proportions (0:l; 1:25; 1:lO; 1:4; 1:2; 1:l; 4:3; 4:l; 1:O w/w C37:3Mc/C37:.Me) were injected five times in the gas chromatograph. The mean standard deviation of the groups of five injection replicates is of the order of 0.001 UK’s7 unit (approximately 0.03”C). Comparison between the theoretical value UK’s, and the measured value UK’s, shows the equivalence of both with high coefficient of correlation (UK’s, ,.,,,,d=O.Ol2+0.992 UK’s,ca,cu,atcd,r=0.99).
the Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle in Paris, Centre Europeen de Recherche et d’Enseignement en Geosciences de I’Environnement in Aix-en-Provence and the Centre des Faibles Radioactivites in Gif-sur-Yvette. We have assumed that the surface layer of sediments taken with box and pilot corer is undisturbed and thus very recent. Highresolution S1*O stratigraphies (Duplessy, 1982; Fontugne and Duplessy, 1986) and 14C dating (Duplessy et al., 199 1) have confirmed that the core tops are representative of the late Holocene. In addition, sediments from the upwelling areas of Oman, Somalia and west of India are characterized by medium to high sedimentation rates during the Holocene period, which further validates the use of the core tops (between 3 and 51 cm kyr-‘; Fontugne and Duplessy, 1986; Sirocko and Ittekkot, 1992). Bioturbation continuously mixes the recently deposited sediments. The top 8-l 5 cm of the sediment column are thus usually homogeneous, as demonstrated for a wide range of sedimentological and geochemical tracers (Peng and Broecker, 1979; Bard er al., 1987; Lapicque et al., 1987). This has been recently confirmed by accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) dating of box cores collected from the upwelling areas off Oman, Yemen and Somalia (Heier-Nielsen et al., 1995). However, the climate during the late Holocene has been relatively stable (Dansgaard et al., 1993) and the geochemical tracers controlled by climatic parameters should be stable in the core tops.
RESULTS
AND DISCUSSION
Modern oceanographic data
Indian Ocean core top UK37 values have been compared with modern water temperatures
C. Sonzogni
et al. 800E
600
400E
N 2oc
INDIAN
OCEAN
0 400 S
2' I\ 5. *' .\ -.'. 16 6' ,,/' ..._ --_ ,' *----____ .* -----_______--_
??
Fig. 3. Location map of the 54 Indian Ocean sediment cores used for this study (core names, locations and water depths are given in Appendix A). 0, Location of the sediment traps used to model the seasonal productivity patterns (Ittekkot et al., 1992) of the three areas of the Northern Indian Ocean [western Arabian Sea (C), eastern Arabian Sea (D) and Bay of Bengal (E)]. The areas representing the equatorial Indian Ocean (A) and the southern Indian Ocean (B) are also indicated.
a computerized oceanographic atlas (Levitus, 1982). This atlas allows monthly water temperature profiles to be read for a defined position (with a grid of f 1” of latitude and longitude). For each core site, seasonal temperature cycles were calculated for 10, 30 and 50 m water depths (Fig. 4). In the northern Indian Ocean, the sea surface circulation is strongly influenced by a seasonal wind system with a strong and humid SW monsoon from June to October and a moderate dry NE monsoon from December to March. During the SW monsoon, coastal upwelling and surface water mixing are observed off Somalia, Oman and west of India. These phenomena produce a marked temperature drop during summer in upwelling areas (see Fig. 4, areas C-E). To derive a calibration, UKs7 values should be compared with mean water temperatures at times of maximum alkenone production. As a first-order approach to calculate a mean production temperature (Flux-Weighted Annual Mean SST; FWAM-SST), we have constructed for each core a simplified annual productivity cycle, which has then been weighted with the seasonal SST cycle. The 54 cores selected for this calibration cover a wide from
1451
Alkenone index vs sea surface temperature in Indian Ocean I
33
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
l
II
EQUATORIAL INDIAN OCEAN (A)
31 _-
U29 D $ z,:&==--
_----
.-*_
_7____._..-
25, 23 24
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
11
I I
SOUTHERN INDIAN OCEAN (B)
22
Y
I
20
r
14 I
31 29 u a k 3
I
,
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
l
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
4
I
I
I
4
I
I
I
I4
WESTERN ARABIAN SEA
27 25 23 21
I
I
33
III
III
I
III
I
I
0
EASTERN ARABIAN SEA (D)
31 -
25 -
III
33 31
I
II
II
BAY OF BENGAL (E)
-
23
I Jan
II
I
I
Feb Mar Apr May Jun
I
I
I
Jul Aug Sep
0
Ott Nov Dee
Months Fig. 4. Representative examples of seasonal temperature cycles from Levitus (1982) for various water depths (10 m, thick continuous line; 30 m, thick dashed line; 50 m, thick dotted line). The areas A-E are described in Fig. 3. The seasonal productivity patterns obtained on representative sediment traps (Ittekkot et al., 1992) deployed in the western Arabian Sea (C), eastern Arabian Sea(D) and in the Bay of Bengal (E) are indicated with thin continuous lines. The differences between the SST from 0 m and 10 m are negligible.
1452
C.
Sonzogniet al
latitudinal transect between 20”N and 45’S (Fig. 3) and we have grouped them in five different oceanic regions that exhibit different productivity patterns (areas A-E in Figs 3 and 4). For the equatorial band (area A), the seasonal SST variations are small (less than 2°C) and the FWAM-SST is almost equal to the Annual Mean SST (AM-SST) (Banse and English, 1994; Brock et al., 1994). For the southern part of the Indian Ocean (area B), the productivity maximum occurs during the austral spring and summer (Banse and English, 1994). In the western Arabian Sea (area C), eastern Arabian Sea (area D) and in Bay of Bengal (area E), the productivity is mainly influenced by upwelling during the SW monsoon and surface water mixing during the NE monsoon (Nair et al., 1989; Ittekkot et al., 1992; see also Fig. 4, areas C-E). To model this productivity cycle, we have used the seasonal cycles averaged over 2 years of particle fluxes from sediment traps deployed in the Arabian Sea and in the Bay of Bengal (dots in Fig. 3) (Nair et al., 1989; Ittekkot et al., 1992). In the eastern Arabian Sea the flux reaches its maximum between August and October, whereas it peaks between July and September in the western Arabian Sea. In the Bay of Bengal, the flux maximum occurs between June and September. These productivity patterns are in agreement with pigment data (Banse, 1987; Brock et al., 1991; Banse and English, 1994) and with the data based on relative frequencies of species of foraminifers and coccolithophorids E. huxleyi and G. oceanica (Kleijne et al., 1988). Recently, Antoine and Morel (1996) and Antoine et al. (1996) presented monthly maps of primary productivity by using chlorophyll satellite imagery (Coastal Zone Color Scanner) and by taking into account ecological and physiological parameters. In general, the mean production temperatures calculated by using these productivity maps are very similar to the weighted temperatures computed for this study (usually the difference is smaller than 0.5X). The most abundant Prymnesiophyceae algae known to produce alkenones (E. huxleyi and G. oceanica) live in the upper water column (Okada and Honjo, 1973; Brown and Yoder, 1994). For our calibration it is necessary to select a water depth representative of the depth where maximum alkenone production occurs. To illustrate this problem, Fig. 4 shows typical seasonal cycles obtained at different depths (IO, 30,50 m) for selected sites of the five regions A-E. We have used a pragmatic approach and considered three water depths (10, 30,50 m) to calculate the AM-SST and FWAM-SST as described above. The living depth of the alkenone producers is probably not constant throughout the year. However, this effect should be negligible considering all other potential sources of errors in the above calculations. The main error is due to bioturbation through which core tops integrate centuries to millennia of productivity cycles. UK,, and temperature We have quantified the alkenones at several depths in the first 10 cm of each core (usually three samples: 0 cm, 5 cm and 10 cm), and we have calculated a mean value for constructing the Ur3,SST relationships. As expected and explained in the sampling section (see above), the maximum difference between the three measurements in the core top is usually less than 0.033 UK 37 unit (approximately 1°C). Most of our samples have been collected in mid- to high SST (6-29°C) regions and IJK3, values vary between 0.2 and 1 (see Appendix A). The samples are characterized by insignificant amounts of C 37,4Mealkenones, which are the basis of the UKa7 index (Brassell et al., 1986b). Indeed, Resell-Melt et al. (1994) showed that for SSTs higher than 5°C the two indices UK’s7 and UKs7 are equal.
Alkenone index vs sea surface temperature in Indian Ocean
5
10
25 F&l-s;;
Fig. 5. Uxs, vs AM-SST (a) and regression line and open circles). whereas the results for 30 m (thin linear best fits. The equations and
1453
30
(“C)
UK’s7vs FWAM-SST (b) from Levitus(1982) at 10 m depth (thick For clarity, UK 37 results are only shown for 10 m water depth continuous line) and 50 m (dashed line) are summarized by their the coefficients of the regression analysis are given in the Table 1.
Figure 5 summarizes the relationships observed between UK’s7 and water temperature. Figure 5(a) represents the AM-SST against UK 37, and Fig. 5(b) shows the seasonal productivity fluctuations or FWAM-SST (see Appendix A). On the graphs only the results obtained at 10 m water depth are plotted, whereas the data on 30 and 50 m are summarized by their linear best fits (see Table 1 and Appendix A). The UKs7 values linearly correlate with water temperatures whatever the water depth for both the AM-SST and FWAM-SST data sets. For the studied three depths, the slopes of the linear regressions are not statistically different (approximately 0.033 UKs7 unit “C-l; see Table 1). However, the linear equations have different y-intercepts, the SST estimated with the 10 m equation being l-2°C warmer than for 50 m water depth. Although it is barely significant (F= VarSo m sux/ Var ,e ,,.,sux = 1.53, close to the value 1.55 of the Fisher-Snedecor law for a significance level of 95%), the correlation coefficient decreases with water depth, which suggests that
1454
Table
C. Sonzogni
1. Linear regression coejkients AM FWAM FWAM AM FWAM AM FWAM
10
30 50 Same conventions
calculatedfor
0.043,0.052 0.013&0.063 0.392kO.143 0.065 kO.055 0.054 + 0.064 0.091 kO.063 0.099 &0.070
et al.
the relationships between UK’,, and SST in the Indian Ocean
0.033+0.002 0.034+0.002 0.02OIf:O.O05 0.033 iO.002 0.033 + 0.003 0.033+0.003 0.033 kO.003
54 54 44 54 54 54 54
0.948 0.936 0.710 0.945 0.928 0.924 0.905
5-30 5-30 2429 5-30 5-30 S-30 5-30
as in Table 2.
alkenone production at 10 m is a likely assumption. These observations are in agreement with a recent study of NE Atlantic surface sediments (Rosell-Mell et al., 1995a). Most of our data are for the high temperature range 24-29°C (Fig. 6) but an enlargement of the diagram still shows that U K’37 is linearly correlated with SST. The correlation coefficients calculated for this 5°C interval are smaller than those found for the entire temperature range, which is logical as the dynamic range is reduced by more than a factor of three. Taken at face value, the results also suggest that the slope of the calibration is slightly smaller than that found for the full range of temperatures (0.020 ) 0.005 vs 0.033 f 0.002; for a significance level of 95%). Comparison
with previous studies
In Fig. 7 the calibration from the Indian Ocean is compared with those obtained by using core tops from other oceanic environments: the Pacific and Atlantic oceans and Black Sea (Sikes et al., 1991) and North-East Atlantic (Rosell-Meli: et al., 1995a). These calibrations are similar, with a common slope of about 0.03 UK’37 unit “C-l (see Table 2). The standard deviations of the data points around the three regression lines are also similar for the three data sets (between 1” and 1.SOC).
Calibration UK3750.8
Calibration O.ZcUK37’41
24
28
2s F&G&
29
(“C)
Fig. 6. UK’&.ST calibrations for temperatures from 5 to 30°C (0.2 < UK’x7< 1; thin continuous line) and for temperatures higher than 24°C (UK 37 > 0.85; thick continuous line) using FWAM-SST at 10 m depth. The linear equation for these high temperatures is UK37 =0.020 SST+ 0.392 (r = 0.843). The f 1o temperature interval (SD OX’C) is given by dashed lines.
Alkenone index vs sea surface temperature in Indian Ocean
Resell-Mel6
1455
et al. 1
*o
0.6
0.5
Indian Ocean,
0.22 5
10
15
this work
25
:
SST p:) Fig. 7. Linear relationships between UK sr and water temperatures derived by analyses of core tops from the Pacific and Atlantic Oceans and the Black Sea (Sikes et al., 1991; thin continuous line), the NE Atlantic (Resell-MeK et al., 1995; dashed line) and the Indian Ocean (this work; thick continuous line; using FWAM-SST at 10 m depth). The regression lines obtained by Sikes et al. (1991) (Atlantic, Pacific and Black Sea) and by Resell-Mel& et al. (1995a) (Atlantic) are also shown. The equations and the coefficients corresponding to the regression analysis are listed in Table 2.
The dominant coccolithophorids in the northern Indian Ocean are E. huxleyi and G. oceanica, with high standing stocks in the western Arabian Sea and south of India (Kleijne et al., 1988). The three calibration equations (10 m, 30 m and 50 m) based on core tops are much closer to the E. huxleyi culture calibration than to that found for G. oceanica (Fig. 8 and Table 2). A first explanation could be that the subpolar G. oceanica strain cultured by Volkman et al. (1995) behaves differently from the algae living in the tropical Indian Ocean. As proposed by Rosell-Meli et al. (1994) and by Volkman et al. (1995), we used the ratio Table 2. Compilation of the regression coeficientsfor the relation between UK’,, and water temperatures established on cultures (Prahl et al., 1988; Volkman et al., 1995) and surface sediments (Sikes et al., 1991; Resell-Meli et al., 1995a; this paper)
Depth (m)
SST
(I
b
n
r2
TR (“C)
IJ
Temperature and depth used for calibration
TR (“C)
I ndex
Sample origin
a
b
n
References
Cultures
UK’3, E. huxleyi 0.040 f 0.066 UK’,, G. oceanica -0.524&0.124 Surface sediments tJr3, Atlantic, Pacific 0.082+0.090 Black Sea 0.093&0.024 UK3, NE Atlantic UK37 Indian Ocean 0.013+0.063
0.034 f 0.004 5 0.994 0.049+0.006 9 0.890
Culture growth Culture growth
8-25 Prahl et al., 1988 1l-29 Volkman et al., 1995
0.031kO.004 16 0.937 Warm seasons
9-29 Sikes et al., 1991
0.030+0.001 1090.958 Summer, 0 m 0.034kO.002 54 0.936 FWAM-SST, 10m
O-28 Resell-Meli et al., 1995a 5-30 This paper
The genera1 equation is UK’s7= a + bT, r’, correlation coefficient; n, number of samples; TR, temperature range. Confidence intervals have been calculated with a significance level of 95%.
1456
C. Sonzogni
et al.
cultures calibration Prshl et al., 1988
0.8 0.7
G. oceanica cultures calibration, Volkman et al., 1995
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
SST (“C) Fig. 8. Linear relationships between UK’37 and water temperatures with data from E. huxleyi cultures (Prahl et al., 1988; dashed continuous line), G. oceanica cultures (Volkman et al., 1995; fine continuous line) and Indian Ocean surface sediments (the present study, open circles and thick line; using FWAM-SST at 10 m depth). The equations and the coefficients corresponding to the regression analysis are given in Table 2
of total Cj7 alkenones/total C 3s alkenones (X37/X38 alkenone ratio) to discriminate between the contribution of the different producers (Fig. 9 and Appendix A). In the Indian Ocean the mean X37/X38 is 1.20 (range 0.87-l .40; (3= 0.12; n = 39), which agrees with data obtained in the NE Atlantic at mid- to high latitudes (Rosell-Melt et al., 1994). The vast majority of our analyses are thus compatible with the ratios observed by Prahl et al. (1988) on cultures of E. huxleyi (mean I .46, CI= 0.21, range 1.18-l .71; n = 5) and by Conte et al. 20’
0.8
Fig. 9.
I
I
0.9
1
I
I
1
I
I
1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 C C37/c C38
Histogram showing the spread of the total C37 alkenones/total C3s alkenones ratio (X37/ 238). The mean X37/X38 for all samples is 1.20 (SD 0.12; range 0.87-1.40; n = 39).
Alkenone index vs sea surface temperature in Indian Ocean
1457
(1994) for strains of E. huxleyi grown at 15°C [mean 1.07, o = 0.16, range 0.86-l .40; cited by Volkman et al. (1995)]. The ratios found for G. oceanica by Volkman et al. (1995) are all significantly different (mean 0.70, cr = 0.08, range 0.59-0.81, n = 9) from that observed in the Indian Ocean. A limited influence of G. oceanica on the Indian Ocean sediments (both for the UK3, and C37/Z38) also could be explained by a difference in total alkenones biosynthesis between the two algae. Indeed, culture studies (Prahl et al., 1988; Volkman et al., 1995) have shown that E. huxleyi biosynthesizes about three times more alkenones than G. oceanica (about 1.2 pg per cell for E. huxleyi vs 0.4 pg per cell for G. oceanica). CONCLUSIONS UK37 values (0.2-l) from surface sediments from the Indian Ocean (2O”N--45”S) are linearly correlated with SST (5-30°C). The best fit is obtained using SST from 10 m at times of highest seasonal productivity. The regression line is similar to those found with laboratory cultures of E. huxleyi and with other sets of core tops from other oceans (Sikes et al., 1991; Rose&MelC et al., 1995a). Above 24°C the slope of the UK37-SST relationship may be smaller (x0.020) than the general slope of about 0.033 UK’37 unit/C. Based on measurements of X37/X38 ratios and on the Up37-SST relationship we suggest that G. oceanica has a limited influence on the distribution of alkenones in the Indian Ocean sediments or that the strain living in the Northern Indian Ocean behaves similarly to E. huxleyi. Acknowledgements-We are grateful to Dr J.C. Duplessy for giving access to cores stored at CFR, Gif-sur-Yvette, Dr J. P. Caulet for cores stored at MNHN, Paris, and Dr Y. Lancelot for cores stored at CEREGE. We thank Professor J. R. Maxwell for providing synthetic alkenones, Dr J. Volkman for giving an aliquot of the Isochrysis galbana strain T. Iso. sample, and Dr P. J. Miiller for providing samples of the University of Bremen’s sediment standards. We also thank Dr J. Guiot for useful discussions. This research is supported by Tempus of EC and PNEDC of INSU-CNRS.
REFERENCES Antoine, D. and Morel, A. (1996) Organic primary production. 1. Adaptation of light-photosynthesis model in view of application to satellite chlorophyll observations. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 10, 43-55. Antoine, D., Andre, J.-M. and Morel, A. (1996) Organic primary production. 2. Estimation at global scale from satellite (coastal zone color scanner) chlorophyll. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 10, 5769. Banse, K. (1987) Seasonality of phytoplankton chlorophyll in the central and northern Arabian Sea. Deep-Sea Research, 34, 713-723.
Banse, K. and English, D. C. (1994) Seasonality of coastal zone color scanner phytoplankton pigment in the offshore oceans. Journal of Geophysical Research, 99, 7323-7345. Bard, E., Arnold, M., Duprat, J., Moyes, J. and Duplessy, J.-C. (1987) Reconstruction of the last deglaciation: deconvolved records of 8180 profiles, micropaleontological variations and accelerator mass spectrometric 14C dating. Climate Dynamics, 1, 101-l 12. Brassell, S. C., Brereton, R. G., Eglinton, G., Grimalt, J., Liebezeit, G., Marlowe, I. T., Pflaumann, U. and Sarnthein, M. (1986a) Paleoclimatic signals recognized by chemometric treatment of molecular stratigraphic data. Organic Geochemistry, 10, 649-660. Brassell, S. C., Eghnton, G., Marlowe, L. T., Pflaumann, U. and Sarnthein, M. (1986b) Molecular stratigraphy: a new tool for climatic assessment. Nature, 320, 129-133. Brock, J., McClain, C. R., Luther, M. E. and Hay, W. W. (1991) The phytoplankton bloom in the Northwestern Arabian Sea during the Southwest Monsoon of 1979. Journal of Geophysical Research, %, 2062320642. Brock, J., Sathyendranath, S. and Platt, T. (1994) A model study of seasonal mixed-layer primary production in the Arabian Sea. In Biogeochemistry of the Arabian Sea, D. La1 (ed.), pp. 6_%78. Indian Academy of Sciences, New Delhi.
1458
C. Sonzogni
et al.
Brown, C. W. and Yoder, J. A. (1994) Coccolithophorid blooms in the global ocean. Journal of Geophysical Research, 99, 746777482. Conte, M. H., Eglinton, G. and Madureira, L. A. S. (1992) Long-chain alkenones and alkyl aikenoates as paleotemperature indicators: their production, flux and early sedimentary diagenesis in the Eastern North Atlantic. Advances in Organic Geochemistry, 19, 287-298 Conte, M. H. and Eglinton, G. (1993) Alkenone and alkenoate distributions within the euphotic zone of the eastern North Atlantic: correlation with production temperature. Deep-Sea Research, 40, 1935-1962. Conte, M. H., Volkman, J. K. and Eglinton, G. (1994) Lipid biomarkers of the Prymnesiophyceae. In The Haptophyte Algae, B. S. C. Leadbeater and J. M. Green (eds), pp. 351-377. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Conte, M. H., Eglinton, G. and Madureira, L. A. S. (1995) Origin and fate of organic biomarker compounds in the water column and sediments of the eastern North Atlantic. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 340, 169-178. Dansgaard, W., Johnsen, S. J., Clausen, H. B., Dahl-Jensen, D.. Gundestrup, N. S., Hammer, C. U., Hvidberg, C. S., Steffensen, J. P., Sveinbjornsdottir, A. E., Jouzel, J. and Bond, G. (1993) Evidence for general instability of past climate from a 250-kyr ice-core record. Nature, 364, 218-220. De Leeuw, J. W., van der Meer, F. W.. Rijpstra, W. I. C. and Schenk, P. A. (1980) On the occurrence and structural identification of long chain ketones and hydrocarbons in recent and subrecent sediments. Advances in Organic Geochemistry, 2 1 l-2 I 7 Duplessy, J. C. (1982) Glacial to interglacial contrasts in the northern Indian Ocean. Nature, 295, 494498. Duplessy, J. C., Bard, E., Arnold, M., Shackleton, N. J., Duprat, J. and Labeyrie, L. (1991) How fast did the ocean-atmosphere system run during the last deglaciation? Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 103, 27-40. Fontugne, M. R. and Duplessy, J. C. (1986) Variations of the monsoon regime during the upper Quaternary: evidence from carbon isotopic record of organic matter in North Indian Ocean sediment cores. Palaeogeography. Palaeoclimatology. Palaeoecology, 56, 69988. Heier-Nielsen, S., Kuijpers, A. and Laier, T. (1995) Holocene sediment deposition and organic matter burial in the upwelling zone off Yemen, Northwest Indian Ocean. Netherlands Indian Ocean Programme Cruise Reports, 4, 111-l 19. Ittekkot, V., Haake, B., Bartsch, M., Nair, R. R. and Ramaswamy, V. (1992) Organic carbon removal in the sea: Geological Society, London, Special Publication, 64, 167-176. the continental connection. Kleijne, A., Kroon, D. and Zevenboom. W. (1988) Phytoplankton and foraminiferal frequencies in northern Indian Ocean and Red Sea surface waters. In Planktonic Foraminifers as Tracers of the Ocean-Climate History, G. J. A. Brummer and D. Kroon (eds), pp. 271&283. Free University Press, Amsterdam. Lapicque, G., Livingston, H. D., Lambert, C. E., Bard, E. and Labeyrie, L. (1987) Interpretation of 239,240Pu in Atlantic sediments with a non-steady state input model. Deep-Sea Research, 34, 1841-1850. Levitus, 8. (1982) Climatological Atlas of the World Ocean. NOAA Professional Paper, 13. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 173 pp. Madureira, L. A. S., Conte, M. H. and Eglinton, G. (1995) The early diagenesis of lipid biomarker compounds in North Atlantic sediments. Paleoceanography, 10, 627-642. Marlowe, I. T.. Brassell, S. C., Eglinton, G. and Green, J. C. (1984) Long chain unsaturated ketones and esters in living algae and marine sediments. Organic Geochemistry, 6, 135-141. Marlowe, I. T., Green, J. C., Neal, A. C., Brassell, S. C., Eglinton, G. and Course, P. A. (1984) Long chain (nC37-C39) alkenones in the Prymnesiophyceae. Distribution of alkenones and other lipids and their taxonomic significance. Journal of British Phycological Society, 19, 203-216. Marlowe, I. T., Brassell, S. C., Eglinton, G. and Green, J. C. (1990) Long-chain alkenones and alkyl alkenoates and the fossil coccolith record of marine sediments. Chemical Geology, 88, 349-375. Nair, R. R., Ittekkot, V., Manganini, S. J., Ramaswamy, V., Haake, B., Degens, E. T., Desai, N. B. and Honjo, S. (1989) Increased particle flux to the deep ocean related to monsoons. Nature, 338, 749-751. Okada, H. and Honjo, S. (1973) The distribution of oceanic coccolithophorids in the Pacific. Deep-Sea Research, 20, 355-374. Peng, T. H. and Broecker, W. S. (1979) Rates of benthics mixing in deep-sea sediment as determined by radioactive tracers. Quaternary Research, 11, 141-149. Poynter, J. and Eglinton, G. (1991) The Biomarker concept-strengths and weaknesses. Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 339, 125-73 1. Prahl, F. G. and Wakeham, S. G. (1987) Calibration of unsaturation patterns in long-chain ketone compositions for palaeotemperature assessment. Nature, 330, 367-369.
1459
Alkenone index vs sea surface temperature in Indian Ocean
Prahl, F. G., Muehlhausen, L. A. and Zahnle, D. (1988) Further evaluation of long-chain alkenones as indicators of paleoceanographic conditions. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 52, 2303-2310. Prahl, F. G., de Lange, G. J., Lyle, M. and Sparrow, M. A. (1989) Post-depositional stability of long-chain alkenones under contrasting redox conditions. Nature, 341, 434-437. Rechka, J. A. and Maxwell, J. R. (1988) Characterisation of alkenone temperature indicators in sediments and organisms. Organic Geochemistry, 13, 727-734. Rosell-Melt, A., Carter, J. and Eglinton, G. (1994) Distribution of long-chain alkenones and alkyl alkenoates in marine sediments from the North East Atlantic. Organic Geochemistry, 22, 501-509. Rosell-Melt, A., Eglinton, G., Pflaumann, U. and Sarnthein, M. (1995a) Atlantic core-top calibration of the Uk37 index as sea-surface paleotemperature indicator. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 59, 3099-3107. Resell-Melt, A., Carter, J., Parry, A. T. and Eglinton, G. (1995b) Determination of the Uk37 index in geological samples. Analytical Chemistry, 67, 1283-1289. Sikes, E. L. and Volkman, J. K. (1993) Calibration of long-chain alkenone unsaturation ratios for palaeotemperature estimation in cold polar waters. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 57, 1883-1889. Sikes, E. L., Farrington, J. W. and Keigwin, L. D. (1991) Use of alkenone unsaturation ratio Uk37 to determine past sea surface. temperatures: core-top SST calibrations and methodology considerations. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 104, 3447. Sirocko, F. and Ittekkot, V. (1992) Organic carbon accumulation rates in the Holocene and glacial Arabian Sea: implications for Oz-consumption in the deep-sea and atmospheric CO2 variations. Climate Dynamics, 7, 167-172.
Sonzogni, C. (1997) Calibration et application de la methode paliothermometrique des alkenones aux sediments quaternaires de 1’Octan Indien. Ph.D. thesis, Univ. Aix-Marseille, France. Volkman, J. K., Eglinton, G., Comer, E. D. S. and Forsberg, T. E. V. (1980) Long chain alkenes and alkenones in the marine coccolithophorid Emiliania huxleyi. Phytochemistry, 19, 2619-2622. Volkman, J. K., Eglinton, G., Corner, E. D. S. and Sargent, J. R. (1980) Novel unsaturated straight-chain C37C39 methyl and ethyl ketones in marine sediments and a coccolithophore Emiliania huxleyi. Advances in Organic Geochemistry, 219-227
Volkman, J. K., Barrett, S. M., Blackburn, S. I. and Sikes, E. L. (1995) Alkenones in Gephyrocapsa oceanica; implications for studies of paleoclimate. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 59, 513-520.
APPENDIX COX
COE
Latitude
Longitude
Depth
lJr3,
AM-SST
no.
name
(“N
V)
(ml
mean
(“C) IOm
(“C) IOm
9
FWAM-SST
Z37/238
AM-SST
mean
(“C)30m
FWAM (“C)30m
SST
AM-SST
FWAM-SST
(“C) 50m
(“C) 50m
MD79254
- 17.530
38.400
1934
0.931
26.7
27.6
1.22
26.3
27.0
25.2
25.5
MD79257
-20.240
36.200
1262
0.953
25.9
26.9
1.17
25.6
26.4
24.6
25.0
MD79260
-20.270
36.490
2061
0323
25.9
26.9
1.38
25.6
26.4
24.6
25.0
MD79261
-29.310
33.150
2060
0.905
23.5
24.5
n.d.
23.2
24.1
22.4
22.9
MD73023
-42.129
51.191
3925
0.421
10.7
II.7
0.87
9.1
9.5
7.8
7.9
MD73029
-45.175
72.510
3825
0.372
8.2
7.9
1.03
8.1
7.8
8.1
7.7
MD76005
-32.383
50.471
4395
0.747
20.3
21.6
n.d.
19.9
20.8
19.1
19.5
MD76009
-34.365
63.304
4425
0.650
18.2
19.4
n.d.
17.6
18.2
16.7
16.7
MD76010
-31.227
61.553
4245
0.630
20.0
21.1
ad.
19.5
20.2
18.6
18.6
IO
MD76011
-24.057
59.553
4425
0.878
23.9
24.6
n.d.
23.7
24.2
23.3
23.4
II
MD77022
-24.121
64.052
1590
0.930
23.7
24.6
1.08
23.5
24.2
23.0
23.2
12
MD79275
- 30.450
48.153
4150
0.740
21.5
22.4
n.d.
21.2
22.0
20.5
21.0
13
MD79277
-30.472
48.144
4092
0.762
21.5
22.4
n.d.
21.2
22.0
20.5
21.0
14
MD79284
-32.395
50.462
4342
0.638
20.3
21.6
n.d.
19.9
20.8
19.1
19 5
I5
MD79294
-28.535
68.147
4386
0.610
21.7
22.8
1.15
21.3
22.1
20.6
20.8
I6
MD84527
-43.49
51.19
3262
0.214
6.6
6.3
1.20
6.6
6.3
6.6
6.3
I7
MD85663
-1.104
44.013
3405
0.961
26.8
26.8
1.20
26.6
26.6
25.9
25.9 25.8
I8
MD85665
-0.292
43.268
2203
0.959
26.6
26.6
n.d.
26.4
26.4
25.8
19
MD85668
-0.010
46.023
4020
0.946
26.7
26.7
1.30
26.6
26.6
25.7
25.7
20
MD85669
46.553
2590
0.955
26.6
26.6
I .22
26.4
26.4
25.7
25.7
2.291
C. Sonzogni
APPENDIX COX
Chre
Lataude
no
name
(N)
21
MD85670
2.417
46.370
803
22
MD85674
3.112
50 267
4875
23
MD65675
2.271
52.056
5077
24
MD85676
I 499
53.208
25
MD85661
7445
26
MD85682
10.535
27
MD90936
7 099
28
MD90939
5.341
29
MD90948
2.087
30
MD90950
2.012
Longitude
et al.
(continued)
Depth
UK37
AM-SST
(m)
mean
(C) IOm
(C) IOm
0941
26.6
26.h
26.4
0 945
27 0
26 3
26.7
0 Y4Y
27.3
26 k
27.0
26.5
26 2
25.9
5080
0 949
27 5
27 I
27.2
26.X
26.3
26.2
53.110
5062
0 928
26 5
256
26.3
25 3
25 7
24.7
52.235
3092
0 902
25.9
24 s
25.3
24.0
24.4
23 0
58 056
2360
0 970
27 4
27 4
26.6
26.6
24 I
24. I
61.385
3860
0 963
27 9
27 Y
27 0
27.0
24.5
24.5
76.218
3954
0 955
28.6
28 6
28.5
28 5
28 I
28. I
75 303
3315
0.9R9
28.6
28.6
28.5
28.5
28.2
28.2
(E)
FWAM-SST
37138
AM-SST
mean
(C) 30m
FWAM
SST
(C) 30m
AM-SST
FWAM-SST
(C) 50m
(C) 5om
26 4
28 7
25.7
26.0
2h 0
25.4
31
MD90956
5.261
73.114
778
0 Ynr
28 8
28 c
28.4
28.4
27.9
27 9
32
MD90957
5 285
73.130
I017
0 978
28.5
28 5
28.4
28.4
27 9
27 9
33
MD90960
5.049
73.470
1906
0.953
28.5
28 5
28.4
28 4
27.9
27 9
34
MD81338
6 550
78.450
2595
0991
28 2
2x 2
28 0
28 0
27 0
27.0 26.9
3s
MD77179
18.220
91.010
1986
0 947
27.8
28 0
27 7
27 8
26 8
36
MD77177
16250
93.240
2284
0 959
27 9
28 0
27.9
28.0
27. I
27.2
37
MD7717h
14.310
93.080
1375
0960
2x 0
2x 0
27.9
28 0
27.2
27.4
38
MD77169
IO.130
95.030
2360
0.971
2x. I
2n !
27.9
28.0
27.0
27.3
39
MD77164
6 060
93 270
2140
O.97h
28 5
28.5
28.3
2R 4
27.8
27 9
40
MD76132
17000
71.310
1430
0 966
27.9
2X.2
27 5
27 6
26.5
26.2
41
MD76131
I5 320
72.340
1230
0 972
28 ?
2x 1
27 8
27 5
26.9
26.2
42
MD76129
15000
72.200
1954
0.967
28 3
28 7
27.8
27.5
26 9
26.2
43
MD77197
13.110
73.260
1260
0.968
2x 5
28 2
27.9
27 I
26.9
25.8
44
MB76127
12050
75 540
1610
0.9hS
28 4
2: x
27 6
26 4
26.6
25.0
45
MD77195
I I 300
74.220
l42h
0 96X
2x.5
27 9
27 7
26.6
26.7
25 I
46
MD77194
10280
75 140
1222
0 974
2x 4
27 7
27 6
26 4
26 3
24.6
47
MD77191
7 300
76.430
,254
0 975
28 2
28 ,J
28 0
27 7
26.')
26. I
48
MD77203
20.420
59.240
2442
0.897
25.x
25 q
24.8
24 4
23 2
22.7
49
MD77204
19.180
58 260
I430
0.x70
2’ 6
2s 2
24 7
24 2
23.2
22 6
50
MD77202
19 I30
60410
2421
0.924
25 Y
25
25 3
25 [
23.9
23.7
51
MD77205
17.440
57.400
989
n 877
25 Y
?5 (
24 9
24.2
23.s
22 8
52
MD76135
14.270
50310
1895
0 925
26.8
Ih 4
24 b
23 3
22 Y
21.3
53
MD77200
16.330
h7.540
2910
0 9hR
27 I
2,
27 3
27 6
26 6
26.9
54
MD76136
12520
46.490
1649
0 930
27 6
27 h
26 I
26. I
23.X
23.8