Corn stover for biogas production: Effect of steam explosion pretreatment on the gas yields and on the biodegradation kinetics of the primary structural compounds

Corn stover for biogas production: Effect of steam explosion pretreatment on the gas yields and on the biodegradation kinetics of the primary structural compounds

Accepted Manuscript Corn stover for biogas production: effect of steam explosion pretreatment on the gas yields and on the biodegradation kinetics of ...

742KB Sizes 12 Downloads 152 Views

Accepted Manuscript Corn stover for biogas production: effect of steam explosion pretreatment on the gas yields and on the biodegradation kinetics of the primary structural compounds Javier Lizasoain, Adrian Trulea, Johannes Gittinger, Iris Kral, Gerhard Piringer, Andreas Schedl, Paal J. Nielsen, Antje Potthast, Andreas Gronauer, Alexander Bauer PII: DOI: Reference:

S0960-8524(17)31347-0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.08.042 BITE 18651

To appear in:

Bioresource Technology

Received Date: Revised Date: Accepted Date:

6 June 2017 7 August 2017 8 August 2017

Please cite this article as: Lizasoain, J., Trulea, A., Gittinger, J., Kral, I., Piringer, G., Schedl, A., Nielsen, P.J., Potthast, A., Gronauer, A., Bauer, A., Corn stover for biogas production: effect of steam explosion pretreatment on the gas yields and on the biodegradation kinetics of the primary structural compounds, Bioresource Technology (2017), doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.08.042

This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Corn stover for biogas production: effect of steam explosion pretreatment on the gas yields and on the biodegradation kinetics of the primary structural compounds Javier Lizasoaina,b, Adrian Truleab, Johannes Gittingerb, Iris Krala,b, Gerhard Piringera,b, Andreas Schedld, Paal J. Nielsenc, Antje Potthast d, Andreas Gronauerb, Alexander Bauera,b,* a

AlpS-GmbH, Centre for Climate Change Adaptation Technologies, Grabenweg 68, A-6010 Innsbruck, Austria

b

University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Department of Sustainable Agricultural Systems, Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Konrad-Lorenz-Strasse 24, A-3430 Tulln, Austria c

Cambi AS, Skysstasjon 11A, 1383 Asker, Norway

d

University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Department of Chemistry, Institute of Chemistry of Renewable Resources, Konrad-Lorenz-Strasse 24, A-3430 Tulln, Austria * Corresponding author at: University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Department of Sustainable Agricultural Systems, Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Konrad-Lorenz-Strasse 24, A-3430 Tulln, Austria. E-mail address: [email protected]

Abstract This study evaluated the effect of steam explosion on the chemical composition and biomethane potential of corn stover using temperatures ranging between 140 and 220 ºC and pretreatment times ranging between 2 and 15 minutes. Biodegradation kinetics during the anaerobic digestion of untreated and corn stover, pretreated at two different intensities, 140 °C for 5 minutes and 180 °C for 5 minutes, were studied in tandem. Results showed that pretreatment at 160 °C for 2 min improved the methane yield by 22%. Harsher pretreatment conditions led to lower hemicellulose contents and methane yields, as well as higher lignin contents, which may be due to the formation of pseudolignin. The biodegradation kinetics trial demonstrated that steam explosion enhances the degradation of structural carbohydrates and lignin.

Keywords: biomass, agricultural residues, maize straw, biofuel, anaerobic digestion

1

1

Introduction

Plant-based resources, such as agricultural residues, can help reduce the use of fossilbased raw materials. Lignocellulosic biomass is the most abundant source of unutilized biomass and its use avoids the competition between food, feed and energy production (Lin and Tanaka, 2006). The use of this type of alternative biomass for the production of gaseous and liquid biofuels has met with growing interest in the last decade (Ho et al., 2014). Agricultural residues can provide large amounts of biomass in a sustainable manner for biogas generation. However, the composition and structure of the lignocellulosic complex limits and often restricts biodegradability during anaerobic digestion (AD), reducing methane production and thus the efficiency of the whole process (Hendriks and Zeeman, 2009; Risberg et al., 2013). In order to weaken and break the links in the lignocellulosic complex and enhance microorganism accessibility to the carbohydrate polymers, a pretreatment step is necessary (Alvira et al., 2010). Steam explosion is currently one of the most attractive and investigated pretreatment methods for both biogas and ethanol production from lignocellulosic biomass. It involves heating up the biomass to a maximum of 240 ºC under high pressure (up to 34 bar) for a few minutes. Then, the pressure is released abruptly, causing an explosive decompression of the lignocellulosic biomass. Steam explosion has been proven to be effective for both biogas and ethanol production using different input materials such as wood (Horn et al., 2011a), grasses (Lizasoain et al., 2016), agricultural residues (Bauer et al., 2009), bioethanol by-products (De Paoli et al., 2011) and municipal waste (Li et al., 2007). The effectiveness of pretreatment on lignocellulosic biomass is generally assessed by measuring the methane yields during its subsequent anaerobic digestion. While it is true 2

that this approach provides important information about the effect of the pretreatment on the final biogas yields, no actual knowledge of the improved biomass degradability can be gained. To learn more about how pretreatment methods improve AD, it is necessary to better understand the biodegradation kinetics of lignocellulosic biomass during the digestion process. Techniques that evaluate the degradation of biomass, such as the rumen derived anaerobic digestion process (RUDAD) and the rumen simulation technique (RUSITEC) have been applied in the field of animal husbandry (Bayané and Guiot, 2011; Machmüller et al., 1998). However, techniques to measure the biodegradation kinetics of biomass during AD are very scarce and only few approaches have been documented, such as the studies performed by Stopp et al. (2009) and Theuretzbacher et al. (2015). The latter is considered a suitable model to investigate the degradation of lignocellulosic biomass during AD and will serve as a basis for this study. The literature on steam exploded corn stover for biogas purposes is very scarce despite corn stover being a widespread source of biomass with an enormous potential for biogas production and steam explosion a technology that is rapidly expanding. Li at al., (2015) studied the effects of steam explosion pretreatment, potassium hydroxide and the sequent pretreatment of potassium hydroxide and steam explosion on the biomethane potential of corn stover. While steam explosion increased the biomethane potential yields by 55% in comparison to the untreated sample, an increase of 80% was obtained after the sequent pretreatment of potassium hydroxide and steam explosion. Siddhu et al. (2016) evaluated the effect of thermal potassium hydroxide, steam explosion and the co-pretreatment of thermal potassium hydroxide and steam explosion on methane yields. They reported maximum improvements in the methane yields in comparison to

3

the untreated biomass of 56%, 40% and 88%, respectively. In addition, Ji et al. (2016) studied the effect of pretreatment with calcium hydroxide, steam explosion and the copretreatment of calcium hydroxide and steam explosion in corn stover. The maximum biomethane yields for each type of pretreatment increased 53%, 34% and 62%, respectively over the yields obtained for untreated corn stover. Despite the positive effect of such co-pretreatments on laboratory-scale trials, the utilization of catalysts in full-scale plants has numerous drawbacks as they are generally expensive, corrode the machinery, modify the pH of the reactor content and have negative environmental repercussions. Therefore, optimizing pretreatment systems that only require the use of heat and water, as steam explosion does, is of great interest for the development of sustainable biofuels. Despite many authors having studied the effects of different pretreatments on the chemical characteristics of biomass or on biomethane yields, there is still a lack of knowledge about the degradation process of biomass during AD. Thus, the aim of this study was to determine the effect of steam explosion on the biomass characterization and methane yields of corn stover without the addition of catalysts and to determine the biodegradation kinetics of the main structural compounds of untreated and pretreated corn stover during the AD process. 2

Material and methods 2.1

Raw material and steam explosion pretreatment

The corn stover used for this study was grown and harvested under standard conditions in Ardud (Romania) in November 2013. The stover was dried on the field, compressed in a round bale and sent to the University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences,

4

Vienna, where it was chopped to a final length of less than 10 cm. The stover was then stored under dry conditions at 4 ºC until pretreatment. The stover was pretreated in March 2014 at the Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU) in Ås (Norway) with a steam explosion unit (Cambi, Asker, Norway), whose performance is described by Horn et al. (2011b). The unit consisted of a 25 KW electric-heated steam boiler (Parat, Flekkefjord, Norway) that could achieve a maximum pressure of 34 bar. An automatic air-actuated valve released the steam into a 20 L pressure vessel that contained the biomass to be pretreated. This valve ensured keeping the pressure in the vessel at the target value. Air was removed from the vessel before every pretreatment was carried out by direct injection of steam until saturation was reached. When each pretreatment was finished, another air-actuated valve was responsible for a rapid pressure reduction in the vessel. This pressure difference transported the pretreated stover to a removable bucket, from which the samples were taken for further tests. The pretreatment step was carried out with temperatures ranging from 140 to 220 °C, using intervals of 20 °C (Table 1). Residence times in the pressure vessel were 2, 5, 10 and 15 minutes. The amount of sample used in all pretreatments was 500 grams. After every pretreatment, the unit was cleaned by running three steam-only pretreatments and flushing the flash tank and bucket with clean tap water. All steam-exploded samples were subsequently vacuum stored at 4 °C until physico-chemical analysis and biogas tests were carried out.

5

2.2

Substrate characterization

The analysis of structural carbohydrates was carried out to gain a deeper understanding of the effect of steam explosion on the chemical properties of corn stover. The composition of untreated and steam exploded biomass was determined by analyzing the following parameters: pH, dry matter, raw ash, volatile solids, cellulose, hemicellulose, acid insoluble lignin (AIL) and crude protein. The dry matter content of the corn stover was determined by drying the samples in an oven at 105 °C until constant weight was reached. The volatile solids (VS) were determined after dry oxidation in a muffle furnace as the difference between the dry matter and the raw ash content (Sluiter et al., 2008a). The cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin of native and pretreated samples were analyzed in duplicates using a two-step acid hydrolysis (Sluiter, 2008b). The dried biomass was milled until the entire sample passed through a 1 mm sieve. 300 mg ± 10 mg of the samples were weighted into pressure tubes. Then 3 ml of 72% sulfuric acid was added and the mixture was incubated at 30 ºC for 60 min. In the second step, 84 ml of deionized water was added to reduce the sulfuric acid to 4% and then the samples were incubated for one hour at 121 ºC in an autoclave. In addition to the samples, a set of sugar recovery standards (SRS) was prepared. The structural carbohydrates were analyzed from the hydrolysis liquor. To determine the acid insoluble lignin (AIL), the autoclaved hydrolysis solution was filtered using filtering crucibles and the remaining insoluble residue was washed, dried overnight at 105 ºC and weighed. Then, the ash content of the dry residue was determined in a muffle furnace at 500 ºC. Chromatographic analysis of the soluble sugars glucose, xylose, galactose, mannose and arabinose was carried out on an Agilent 1100 HPLC system (Agilent Technologies, 6

Waldbronn, Germany) set up with a 7.8 x 100 mm Rezex RFQ-Fast Fruit H+ column (Phenomenex, CA, USA) heated to 80 ºC. The mobile phase consisted of 5 mM sulfuric acid and the flow rate used was 0.4 ml per minute. The HPLC samples were prepared by 5-fold dilution of the previously filtered hydrolysis liquor with HPLC-grade water, followed by a second filtration using membrane filter Filtropur S with a pore size of 0.2 um (Sarstedt, Nümbrecht, Germany). The eluted monosaccharides were detected by recording the refractive index and the analytes were identified and quantified by running standards. Chromatograms were recorded, integrated and analyzed using the Chromeleon 6.8 chromatography software from Dionex (Sunnyvale, CA, USA). To determine the protein content, total nitrogen was determined in duplicates according to the Kjeldahl method using the SpeedDigester K-439 (Büchi, Flawil, Switzerland) and a distillation unit type B-324 (Büchi, Flawil, Switzerland). The protein content was determined from the total nitrogen by applying the conversion factor 6.25 (ConklinBrittain et al., 1999). In addition, the water soluble fraction (WSF) was determined. For this, around 50 grams of biomass was introduced in nylon filter bags. The bags were washed with deionized water until the runoff was clear (following the same procedure explained in section 2.4). The amount of biomass lost during this step is defined as the WSF. Harvesting and baling operations can add substantial amounts of soil-derived ash to the baled corn stover (Bonner et al., 2014). In order to avoid distorted results due to heterogeneous soil contamination, the physico-chemical parameters showed hereinafter are provided as a percentage of volatile solids (VS) instead of dry matter (DM).

7

2.3

Specific biogas and methane yield determination

AD trials were performed in triplicate to determine the specific biogas and methane yields of untreated and pretreated corn stover according to VDI 4630 (2006), using eudiometer batch fermenters with 250 ml capacity. The corn stover samples and the inoculum were weighed out in a ratio of 1:3 based on the VS content. Every fermenter was filled with 200 ml of inoculum consisting of a mixture of two inocula, which came from a previous BMP test using steam-exploded biomass, and from a biogas plant located in Margarethen am Moos (Austria) that was using lignocellulosic biomass and manure as input material. The mixing of the two inocula was carried out in a 1:1 volume ratio and then the mixed inoculum was sieved and diluted to 4% DM. Prior to the performance of the test, the inoculum was stored for 10 days at mesophilic conditions in order to reduce the residual gas production. No nutritional additives were used and microcrystalline cellulose was used as control. The fermenters were continuously stirred with a magnetic system and maintained in water baths at mesophilic conditions (37.5 °C) over the course of the 49 days that the process took place. The production of biogas and methane was monitored on a daily basis and all gas volumes are reported under conditions of 273.15 K and 101.33 kPa per kilogram of volatile solids (L kg-1 VS). The methane (CH4) and carbon dioxide (CO2) contents in the biogas were simultaneously analyzed with the portable gas analyzer “Dräger X-am 7000” (Dräger, Lübeck, Germany). The gas analyzer was calibrated weekly with a gas standard consisting of 33% CH4 and 33% CO2 (Messer, Gumpoldskirchen, Austria). In addition, the portable gas analyzer was used to determine the content of H2, O2 and H2S.

8

2.4

Biodegradation kinetics

The biodegradation kinetics of the main structural components of untreated and pretreated biomass (at 140 ºC and 180 ºC, both for 5 minutes) were investigated using a modification of the rumen simulation technique (RUSITEC) developed by Czerkawski and Breckenridge (1977). The selection of the two steam explosion conditions (140 ºC and 180 ºC for 5 minutes) was based on a pre-test, which revealed that low and mild intensity pretreatments provide higher gas yields. Based on the original method, nitrogen and ash-free nylon filter bags F57 (Ankom Technology, NY, USA) with 25 µm porosity were filled with the samples, sealed with a welding impulse sealer AIE-200 (American International Electric, CA, USA) and fed into three 20-L digesters using one digester per biomass type. Then, the digesters were filled with the same inoculum described in section 2.3 in order to reach an inoculumsubstrate ratio (ISR) of 2 based on DM content. The three digesters were located in independent water baths set at 37.5 °C and equipped with a water lock to allow the produced biogas to exit the digester. At the start of the experiment, and after every sample removal, the headspace of the digesters was flushed with nitrogen. For each variant, digesters were filled with five filter bags. The bags were withdrawn for chemical analysis after 3, 7, 10, 20, and 40 days after the beginning of the experiment. Initial concentrations of the main structural components were determined in a sixth filter bag, which was named “day-0-bag”. Before the chemical analyses were carried out, all bags, including the day-0-bag, were washed with deionized water until the runoff was clear and then dried in an oven at 45 °C. The chemical analyses performed in this trial were dry matter, raw ash, volatile solids,

9

cellulose, hemicellulose and AIL. The methodology used for these analyses is the same as described above in section 2.2. 2.5

Statistical analysis

The tables and figures provided in this study present mean values and standard deviations of the experiments carried out. The computer program SPSS version 21 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, USA) was used to statistically analyze all the data. Homogeneity of variances was preliminarily checked using Levene's test. Multiple means were compared with one-way ANOVA followed by Scheffé test for post hoc comparison. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05.

3

Results and discussion 3.1

Pretreatment effects on corn stover composition

Table 1 shows the influence of steam explosion pretreatment at various intensities on specific physicochemical parameters. As it can be seen, all pretreated samples reported lower pH values than the untreated control (pH 7.5), decreasing from 6.9, obtained at 160 °C for 2 minutes, to 3.9, obtained at 220 °C for 10 minutes. Steam explosion pretreatment causes acetyl groups in the hemicellulose fraction to hydrolyze, leading to a build-up of acetic and uronic acids, thus reducing the pH value in the pretreated samples (Laser et al., 2002). The released acids offer some beneficial effects for the subsequent AD process as they promote higher hydrolysis rates of the cell wall components (Boussaid et al., 2000). Reductions in the pH after intense steam explosion conditions have been observed in different types of biomass (Bauer et al., 2014; Edwards, 2005).

10

As Table 1 shows, the DM content of the untreated sample was 86% FM. This value decreased strongly in all pretreated samples, ranging from 51.6%, after pretreatment at 180 °C for 2 min, to 20.3%, after pretreatment at 200 °C for 15 min. In general terms, DM content decreased under longer pretreatment times. This trend was caused by the utilization of direct steam injection to reach the high pressures and temperatures needed in the steam explosion reactor. Higher temperatures and longer pretreatment times required more steam to maintain the target temperature and therefore, more water was added to the samples. This observation is in line with results from previous studies (Bauer et al., 2009; Bauer et al., 2014; Theuretzbacher et al., 2015). <>

Moreover, the VS content is shown in Table 1. The untreated sample had a VS content of 94.3% DM. In general terms, lower VS contents were measured when longer pretreatment times were applied. In addition, higher temperatures slightly promoted a reduction in the VS content. The lowest VS content, which reached 90.8% DM, was obtained under the harshest steam explosion conditions (i.e. 220 °C for 15 minutes). This phenomenon can be mostly explained by the escape of volatile degradation products of hemicellulose in the explosion step. Nevertheless, some of the pretreated samples showed significant inconsistencies in the ash content that could not be explained by the loss of volatile compounds during the pretreatment alone and were probably caused by the aforementioned soil contamination (Bonner et al., 2014). Steam explosion of different biomasses, such as wheat straw or hay, also reported significant reductions in the VS content (Bauer et al., 2014; De Paoli et al., 2011).

11

As Table 1 shows, no clear trend between the cellulose content and the intensity of the pretreatment was found. While the untreated sample had a cellulose content of 39.0% VS, the pretreated samples oscillated between 30.3% VS, obtained at 220 °C for 15 minutes, and 44.7% VS, obtained at 200 °C for 15 minutes. However, it is noteworthy that the content of cellulose was lower after pretreatment at the two harshest conditions (i.e. 220 °C for 10 and 15 minutes). This reduction did not agree with the study carried out by Horn et al. (2011), which reported a relative increase in the cellulose content of wheat straw with steam explosion pretreatment at high temperatures. The observed reduction in the cellulose content of the two samples listed above was not expected beforehand as cellulose is crystalline in structure and it was not expected to undergo hydrolysis under the range of temperatures used in this pretreatment. However, the presence of catalysts together with a low pH might have promoted the hydrolysis of the cellulose amorphous regions as published by some authors (Wang et al., 2015). In contrast to cellulose content, Table 1 shows that the hemicellulose content was strongly affected by the more intense pretreatment conditions. Untreated corn stover had a hemicellulose content of 26.6% VS. Hemicellulose was relatively stable up to an intensity of 200 °C for 2 minutes. More intense conditions decreased the percentage of hemicellulose remarkably. The lowest hemicellulose content reported was 1.0% VS, which was obtained after pretreatment at 220 °C for 15 minutes. These results could be explained by the ability of steam explosion to hydrolyze the hemicellulose fraction of corn stover into simple sugars. However, compared to steam-exploded miscanthus (Menardo et al., 2013) and hay (Bauer et al., 2014), corn stover required harsher conditions in order to obtain similar hemicellulose reductions.

12

In addition, the acid insoluble lignin (AIL) content was substantially altered by steam explosion conditions. Untreated corn stover had an AIL content of 17.3% VS. As already seen in the hemicellulose, the amount of AIL did not follow any clear trend with pretreatments below 200 °C. However, steam explosion at 200 and 220 °C showed significant increases in the AIL content. It was seen that at these two temperatures, 200 and 220 °C, the pretreatment time played an important role; longer pretreatments showed remarkable AIL increments. This was especially noteworthy for the pretreatment carried out at 220 ºC, where the AIL rose from 23.5% VS, which was obtained with the pretreatment at 220 °C for 2 minutes, to 43.8% VS, obtained at 220 °C for 15 minutes. Many studies have revealed that steam explosion pretreatment can substantially affect the lignin content. However, the reported effects did not follow a clear pattern. Menardo et al. (2013) reported a reduction in the acid detergent lignin (ADL) of more than 50% for steam-exploded miscanthus. In the study, untreated miscanthus had an initial ADL content of 15.6% DM, which decreased to 7.9% DM when the biomass was pretreated at 220 °C for 15 minutes. Similar decreases were obtained in the Klason lignin of steam-exploded eucalyptus (Martin-Sampedro et al., 2011) and Hesperaloe funifera (Martín-Sampedro et al., 2012). In addition, reductions in the lignin content have been reported after hydrothermal pretreatments of diverse plant biomass (Bobleter, 1994). On the other hand, many studies have documented noticeable lignin increases after pretreatment with steam explosion. Bauer et al. (2014) described up to four-fold increases in the ADL content of hay with steam explosion pretreatment at 220 ºC for 15 min. Horn et al. (2011b) studied the effect of steam explosion on wheat straw, reporting increases in the Klason lignin of 44% after pretreatment at 210 ºC for 10 min.

13

Moreover, steam exploded birch showed considerable accumulation of Klason lignin, which increased with the severity of pretreatment (Vivekanand et al., 2013). According to Ramos (2003) the more drastic the conditions used in the steam explosion pretreatment, the higher the relative amount of AIL in the biomass. Researchers have attributed such lignin increases after steam explosion to the formation of pseudo-lignin (Hu et al., 2012). In the literature, the main components that constitute lignocellulosic biomass were proven to react differently according to the intensity of thermal pretreatments. The hemicellulose fraction was reported to start hydrolyzing at 150 ºC (Hendriks and Zeeman, 2009). The steam used in the pretreatment together with the acetic acid coming from the biomass, trigger the hydrolysis of hemicelluloses and releases sugars, xylose being the most significant. After reaching and exceeding 160 ºC, lignin follows suit. The degradation products are principally phenolic compounds, weak acids and furan derivatives (e.g. furfural and HMF) (Hu et al., 2012; Lam et al., 2009), which have inhibitory or toxic effects on the microorganisms involved in biogas production (Hendriks and Zeeman, 2009). Some of the degradation products, generated under severe steam explosion conditions, can be involved in condensation and repolymerization reactions leading to increases in the acid-insoluble lignin fraction, which is then redefined as pseudo-lignin (Sannigrahi et al., 2011). In the present study, the observed increase in lignin content after intense pretreatments with steam explosion could be attributed to the formation of pseudo-lignin. However, to date, there are significant analytical limitations to distinguishing between the exact contents of lignin and pseudo-lignin. Traditional analytical procedures, such as the method developed by

14

Van Soest and Wine (1967) or acid hydrolysis methods, are not able to make this distinction. In this study, a simple linear regression was computed in excel software (Microsoft, WA, USA) for the AIL and hemicellulose content of the 20 different pretreated samples (see Figure 1). The regression showed a strongly negative correlation (R2 = 0.95) between the hemicellulose and AIL contents. These results support the hypothesis that the sugars derived from the hydrolysis of hemicellulose play a key role in the production of pseudo-lignin and agree with the study carried out by Ballesteros et al. (2004), which recorded slight increases in the AIL content of herbaceous biomass caused by condensation and re-polymerization reactions. This production of pseudolignin during the pretreatment should be avoided as it decreases the enzymatic conversion, and thus provides lower methane yields (Hu et al., 2012; Kumar et al., 2013). Hence, an optimization of the pretreatment parameters for each biomass type is a key step in obtaining high conversion efficiencies. <<
>>

Steam explosion pretreatment also altered the protein content of corn stover (see Table 1). The untreated samples showed a crude protein content of 3.5% VS. No significant differences were observed in the protein after mild pretreatments. However, for pretreatments carried out at 200 °C and 15 minutes, as well as all the pretreatments performed at 220 ºC, noticeable increases in the protein content were found. The highest crude protein content from the steam-exploded biomass was 5.4% VS and resulted from the sample pretreated under the harshest conditions (i.e. 220 °C and 15 minutes). This situation is consistent with observations made after steam explosion of other biomass

15

(Bauer et al., 2014; Ericsson and Nilsson, 2006; Theuretzbacher et al., 2015). It can be assumed that the reason for such an increase in the protein content comes from the relative increase in the nitrogen content due to the loss of volatile solids during steam explosion. This hypothesis was supported by a simple linear regression computed in excel software between the biomass lost in the pretreatment and the protein content. The regression, which showed a positive correlation (R2 = 0.78), could be described with the linear function y = 0.041x + 3.239, where y is the content of protein (% VS) and x is the biomass lost in the pretreatment (% VS). In addition, the pretreatment intensity had a strong influence on the water soluble fraction (WSF). The WSF of the untreated biomass was 12.5 % VS. All pretreated samples had higher values, increasing in line with the pretreatment intensity from 15.1%, obtained at 140 °C for 2 minutes, to 51.6 %, obtained at 220 °C for 15 minutes. The reason pretreatment had such a large influence on this fraction is the aforementioned capacity of steam explosion to hydrolyze the long chain molecules into smaller units such as monomers and oligomers and thus increase the solubility of the pretreated biomass in water.

3.2

Specific biogas and methane yields

Figure 2Error! Reference source not found. shows the average specific biogas and methane yields of the various corn stover samples tested in the anaerobic batch experiments. The untreated corn stover showed a biogas yield of 467 L kg-1 VS. In general terms, the trials revealed that severe pretreatment conditions led to lower biogas yields. The highest biogas yield, 585 L kg-1 VS, resulted from a corn stover sample pretreated at a temperature of 160 °C for 2 minutes, which corresponded to an increase 16

of 25% in comparison to the untreated sample. The lowest biogas yield, 370 L kg-1 VS, resulted from the pretreatment carried out at 220 °C for 15 minutes, which were the most intense conditions tested. <<
>> The methane yields showed similar tendencies to those outlined above for biogas. The untreated sample showed a methane yield of 285 L kg-1 VS. The highest methane yield was 348 L kg-1 VS, which was measured in the sample pretreated at 160 °C for 2 minutes. Nevertheless, the analysis of the variance (ANOVA) performed with the Scheffé post hoc test showed no significant difference with the second highest methane yield, 339 L kg-1 VS, obtained in the sample pretreated at 140 °C for 15 minutes. When compared to the untreated stover, pretreatments at 160 °C for 2 minutes and 140 °C for 15 minutes increased the methane yields 22% and 19%, respectively. The lowest methane yield, 206 L kg-1 VS, resulted from the harshest pretreatment (i.e. 220 °C for 15 minutes). Mild pretreatment intensities showed the best performance. Similar pretreatment conditions applied to other raw materials were shown to promote sufficient disruption of the lignocellulosic structure to boost the bioconversion of biomass to methane without having a significant loss of soluble sugars due to side reactions (Lizasoain et al., 2016; Pereira Ramos, 2003). As reported by Hu et al. (2012) and Rasmussen et al. (2014), harsh pretreatment conditions may increase the reactive area but the intensity may be counterproductive as they can create toxic and recalcitrant compounds such as furan derivatives and pseudo-lignin. Such compounds might represent a significant barrier to proper hydrolysis and bioconversion to methane. In the present study, the samples with the highest lignin contents showed the lowest methane

17

potential. Moreover, the loss of some volatile compounds with high methane potential, such as organic acids, that takes place under intense pretreatment conditions might have also contributed to the observed reduction in gas yields.

It is worth noting that, while the untreated sample produced biogas with a 61% methane content, in the samples pretreated with steam explosion, methane content ranged from 61%, obtained with pretreatment at 140 °C for 5 minutes, to 54%, obtained with pretreatment at 200 °C for 15 minutes. Higher pretreatment intensities showed lower methane percentages. Some studies have reported that longer carbon chain lengths in the biomass promote higher concentrations of methane in biogas (D. Deublein and Steinhauser, 2008). As steam explosion breaks the long-chain carbohydrates into individual sugars and oligomers, the shorter carbon chains obtained with harsher pretreatments could be the cause of the observed decrease in the percentage of methane. Evidence shows that steam explosion can notably improve the methane production of corn stover. Nevertheless, as the quality of corn stover may vary depending on local conditions, a substrate-specific optimization using different pretreatment intensities has to be carried out for each individual case in order to maximize biomass degradation and methane production.

3.3

Biodegradation kinetics

Figure 3a shows the relative biomass component concentration and methane production of the untreated corn stover. In addition, Figure 3b displays the relative biomass component concentration and methane production of the corn stover pretreated at 140 ºC for 5 minutes. Moreover, Figure 3c shows the aforementioned parameters for the

18

biomass pretreated at 180 ºC for 5 minutes. The relative concentrations indicate the level of degradation at a particular time of the experiment. The difference to 100% comes from the soluble sugars and acids removed during the washing step with deionized water as well as from the remaining organic compounds not analyzed. In addition, the curves shown in Figures 3a-c represent cumulative methane production at specific times. Methane production was measured in parallel to the biodegradation kinetics trial.

<<>>

Pretreated samples showed higher disintegration of the structural compounds. This difference was especially remarkable in the day-0 bags (see Figures 3a-c); while the amount of untreated sample introduced into the sealed filter bag was reduced after the washing step by 17%, samples pretreated at 140 ºC and 180 ºC revealed a reduction of 32% and 36%, respectively. This observation indicates that biomass pretreated with steam explosion underwent a noticeable disruption of the lignocellulosic complex and therefore contained a higher water soluble fraction (e.g. simple sugars and oligomers). In addition, steam explosion promoted a substantial reduction in the amount of biomass remaining inside the filter bags withdrawn after 3, 7, 10, 20, and 40 days of anaerobic digestion. At the end of the 40-day test, the biomass reduction in the untreated sample was 79%, while in the samples pretreated at 140 ºC and 180 ºC were 84% and 89%, respectively. When taking a closer look at the degradation of the structural carbohydrates and AIL in the biodegradation kinetics trial (see Figures 3a-c), substantial differences induced by

19

the pretreatment could be observed. For cellulose content, the biggest difference between the three different samples was recorded in the day-0 bags. The cellulose content in the untreated sample was 45%. Cellulose content was reduced to 36% with pretreatment at 140 ºC for 5 minutes and to 31 % with pretreatment at 180 ºC for 5 minutes. The biggest difference in the hemicellulose content between the three samples was obtained at day 3. The hemicellulose content in the untreated sample and in the samples pretreated at 140 ºC and 180 ºC were 21%, 14% and 13%, respectively. Moreover, special focus should be paid to the promotion of AIL degradation caused by steam explosion. The AIL content of the untreated sample declined progressively during the 40-day trial, from 15% obtained in the day-0 bag to 8% obtained in the bag withdrawn after 40 days of AD. In the same way, the sample pretreated at 140 ºC had a decrease in the initial AIL content from 14% to 5%, whereas the pretreatment at 180 ºC had a decrease in the AIL from 12% to 4%. While lignin degradability of untreated biomass is well known to be limited by lignin’s recalcitrant properties, different authors have shown moderate conversion of lignin in AD processes (Barakat et al., 2012; Hu and Ragauskas, 2012). This conversion has been reported to be enhanced after pretreatments with different technologies (Theuretzbacher et al., 2015; Vivekanand et al., 2013). In the current study, the moderate AIL disruption observed in the untreated sample has been significantly improved by the utilization of steam explosion pretreatment. Moreover, Figures 3a-c include the cumulative methane production of the three different samples studied in detail. The samples that underwent steam explosion had a

20

higher rate of methane production in comparison to the untreated sample from the beginning of the trial. During the first 15 days of the experiment, the sample pretreated at 180 ºC for 5 minutes had higher methane production than the sample pretreated at 140 ºC for 5 minutes, which in turn had higher methane production than the native sample. The biggest difference in methane production between the untreated and two pretreated samples was seen after 8 days of AD. The untreated sample reached 162 L kg-1 VS of methane, whereas samples pretreated at 140 ºC and 180 ºC achieved 171 and 184 L kg-1 VS of methane, respectively. The reason for such differences comes from the higher availability of easily degradable carbohydrates (e.g. xylose and glucose) released mainly from hemicellulose but also from cellulose after steam explosion pretreatment. These sugars are available for the microorganisms from the very beginning of anaerobic digestion. This assumption is supported by the study carried out by Zhuang et al. (2017), who reported the release of high amounts of the monosaccharides xylose, manose and glucose after hydrothermal pretreatments of aspen biomass at 170 ºC. It is also noteworthy that the sample pretreated at 180 ºC for 5 minutes, had no lag phase in the methane production, contrary to what was reported by Perez-Elvira et al. (2016), which used biomass at similar intensities. It should be noted that the inoculum used in the present trial was properly adapted to the use of steamexploded biomass, which may have helped to avoid any possible initial inhibition. From day 16 onwards there were no significant differences in the methane production from the sample pretreated at 180 ºC for 5 minutes and the untreated sample, however both of them provided higher methane production than the sample pretreated at 140 ºC for 5 minutes. This trial demonstrates that the main advantage of the steam explosion pretreatment of corn stover occurs primarily during the first 15 days of AD.

21

Of the three different samples used in the present study, pretreatment at 180 ºC for 5 minutes obtained the highest AIL degradation rate as well as the highest methane production. This pretreatment has shown to be the one that most encourages the hydrolysis of carbohydrates into simple sugars before AD takes place. In addition, the higher degradation of AIL facilitates better access by microbial enzymes to cellulose and hemicellulose (Kumar et al., 2013; Kumar and Wyman, 2009), which may help improve the anaerobic conversion of the remaining polysaccharides to monosaccharides and thus, increase the biomass degradation and the final methane yields. Moreover, some of the compounds derived from the depolymerization of lignin are able to provide high methane yields (Vivekanand et al., 2013). Accordingly, higher AIL degradation may contribute to higher methane production to some extent. Nevertheless, it should be kept in mind that the utilization of very intense pretreatment conditions may lead to the production of pseudo-lignin, which results in the inhibition of enzymatic hydrolysis of carbohydrates (Hu et al., 2012).

4

Conclusion

Steam explosion is an efficient pretreatment for the bio-conversion of corn stover into biogas. High temperature and longer retention time resulted in a remarkable hemicellulose reduction and a significant AIL increase. The pretreatment carried out at 160 ºC for 2 minutes increased methane yields by 22%, while harsher pretreatment conditions led to lower methane yields, probably due to the formation of pseudo-lignin and inhibitors. The biodegradation kinetics trial showed that steam explosion boosted the degradation of biomass and the rate of methane formation, as well as promoted the degradation of AIL during the AD process.

22

Acknowledgements This study was funded by the Competence Centers for Excellent Technologies (COMET) through alpS - Centre for Climate Change Adaptation. COMET is an initiative of the Federal Ministry of Transport, Innovation and Technology and the Federal Ministry of Science, Research and Economy. The Austrian Research Promotion Agency (FFG) is responsible for the management of COMET. In addition, we would like to thank Prof. Svein J Horn and Elisabeth Fjærvoll Olsen from the Norwegian University of Life Sciences for their valuable help with the pretreatment phase as well as Molly K. Saylor for the English proofreading.

23

References 1. Alvira, P., Tomás-Pejó, E., Ballesteros, M., Negro, M.J., 2010. Pretreatment technologies for an efficient bioethanol production process based on enzymatic hydrolysis: A review. Bioresour. Technol., 101, 4851-4861. 2. Ballesteros, M., Oliva, J.M., Negro, M.J., Manzanares, P., Ballesteros, I., 2004. Ethanol from lignocellulosic materials by a simultaneous saccharification and fermentation process (SFS) with Kluyveromyces marxianus CECT 10875. Process Biochem., 39, 1843-1848. 3. Barakat, A., Monlau, F., Steyer, J.P., Carrere, H., 2012. Effect of lignin-derived and furan compounds found in lignocellulosic hydrolysates on biomethane production. Bioresour. Technol., 104, 90-99. 4. Bauer, A., Bösch, P., Friedl, A., Amon, T., 2009. Analysis of methane potentials of steam-exploded wheat straw and estimation of energy yields of combined ethanol and methane production. J. Biotechnol., 142, 50-55. 5. Bauer, A., Lizasoain, J., Theuretzbacher, F., Agger, J.W., Rincón, M., Menardo, S., Saylor, M.K., Enguídanos, R., Nielsen, P.J., Potthast, A., Zweckmair, T., Gronauer, A., Horn, S.J., 2014. Steam explosion pretreatment for enhancing biogas production of late harvested hay. Bioresour. Technol., 166, 403-410. 6. Bayané, A., Guiot, S.R., 2011. Animal digestive strategies versus anaerobic digestion bioprocesses for biogas production from lignocellulosic biomass. Rev. Environ. Sci. Biotechnol., 10, 43-62. 7. Bobleter, O., 1994. Hydrothermal degradation of polymers derived from plants. Prog. Polym. Sci., 19, 797-841. 8. Bonner, I.J., Smith, W.A., Einerson, J.J., Kenney, K.L., 2014. Impact of Harvest Equipment on Ash Variability of Baled Corn Stover Biomass for Bioenergy. Bioenergy Res., 7, 845-855. 9. Boussaid, A.L., Esteghlalian, A.R., Gregg, D.J., Lee, K.H., Saddler, J.N., 2000. Steam pretreatment of Douglas-fir wood chips. Can conditions for optimum hemicellulose recovery still provide adequate access for efficient enzymatic hydrolysis? Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol., 84-86, 693-705. 10. Capári, D., Dörgő, G., Dallos, A., 2016. Comparison of the effects of thermal pretreatment, steam explosion and ultrasonic disintegration on digestibility of corn stover. J. Sustain. Dev. Energy Water Environ. Syst., 4, 107-126. 11. Conklin-Brittain, N.L., Dierenfeld, E.S., Wrangham, R.W., Norconk, M., Silver, S.C., 1999. Chemical protein analysis: A comparison of Kjeldahl crude protein and total ninhydrin protein from wild, tropical vegetation. J. Chem. Ecol., 25, 2601-2622. 12. Czerkawski, J.W., Breckenridge, G., 1977. Design and development of a long-term rumen simulation technique (Rusitec). Br. J. Nutr., 38, 371-384. 13. D. Deublein, Steinhauser, A., 2008. Biogas from Waste and Renewable Resources: an Introduction. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH, Weinheim. 14. De Paoli, F., Bauer, A., Leonhartsberger, C., Amon, B., Amon, T., 2011. Utilization of by-products from ethanol production as substrate for biogas production. Bioresour. Technol., 102, 6621-6624. 15. Edwards, R.A.H., Šúri, M., Huld, T., Dallemand, J.F., 2005. GIS-based assessment of cereal straw energy resource in the EU. In: Proceedings of the 14th European Biomass Conference and Exhibition. Biomass for Energy, Industry and Climate Protection, 17– 21 October 2005, Paris. 24

16. Ericsson, K., Nilsson, L.J., 2006. Assessment of the potential biomass supply in Europe using a resource-focused approach. Biomass Bioenergy, 30, 1-15. 17. Hendriks, A.T.W.M., Zeeman, G., 2009. Pretreatments to enhance the digestibility of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour. Technol., 100, 10-18. 18. Ho, D.P., Ngo, H.H., Guo, W., 2014. A mini review on renewable sources for biofuel. Bioresour. Technol., 169, 742-749. 19. Horn, S.J., Estevez, M.M., Nielsen, H.K., Linjordet, R., Eijsink, V.G.H., 2011a. Biogas production and saccharification of Salix pretreated at different steam explosion conditions. Bioresour. Technol., 102, 7932-7936. 20. Horn, S.J., Nguyen, Q.D., Westereng, B., Nilsen, P.J., Eijsink, V.G.H., 2011b. Screening of steam explosion conditions for glucose production from non-impregnated wheat straw. Biomass Bioenergy, 35, 4879-4886. 21. Hu, F., Jung, S., Ragauskas, A., 2012. Pseudo-lignin formation and its impact on enzymatic hydrolysis. Bioresour. Technol., 117, 7-12. 22. Hu, F., Ragauskas, A., 2012. Pretreatment and Lignocellulosic Chemistry. Bioenergy Res., 5, 1043-1066. 23. Ji, J., Zhang, J., Yang, L., He, Y., Zhang, R., Liu, G., Chen, C., 2016. Impact of copretreatment of calcium hydroxide and steam explosion on anaerobic digestion efficiency with corn stover. Environ. Technol., 38, 1465-1473. 24. Kumar, R., Hu, F., Sannigrahi, P., Jung, S., Ragauskas, A.J., Wyman, C.E., 2013. Carbohydrate derived-pseudo-lignin can retard cellulose biological conversion. Biotechnol. Bioeng., 110, 737-753. 25. Kumar, R., Wyman, C.E., 2009. Effect of additives on the digestibility of corn stover solids following pretreatment by leading technologies. Biotechnol. Bioeng., 102, 15441557. 26. Lam, P.S., Bi, X., Lim, C.J., Sokhansanj, S., Melin, S., 2009. Kinetic modeling of pseudolignin formation in steam exploded woody biomass. 8th World Congress of Chemical Engineering, Canada 2009 Aug 23-27. 27. Laser, M., Schulman, D., Allen, S.G., Lichwa, J., Antal Jr, M.J., Lynd, L.R., 2002. A comparison of liquid hot water and steam pretreatments of sugar cane bagasse for bioconversion to ethanol. Bioresour. Technol., 81, 33-44. 28. Li, A., Antizar-Ladislao, B., Khraisheh, M., 2007. Bioconversion of municipal solid waste to glucose for bio-ethanol production. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng., 30, 189-196. 29. Li, J., Zhang, R., Siddhu, M.A.H., He, Y., Wang, W., Li, Y., Chen, C., Liu, G., 2015. Enhancing methane production of corn stover through a novel way: Sequent pretreatment of potassium hydroxide and steam explosion. Bioresour. Technol., 181, 345-350. 30. Lin, Y., Tanaka, S., 2006. Ethanol fermentation from biomass resources: Current state and prospects. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 69, 627-642. 31. Lizasoain, J., Rincón, M., Theuretzbacher, F., Enguídanos, R., Nielsen, P.J., Potthast, A., Zweckmair, T., Gronauer, A., Bauer, A., 2016. Biogas production from reed biomass: Effect of pretreatment using different steam explosion conditions. Biomass Bioenergy, 95, 84-91. 32. Machmüller, A., Ossowski, D.A., Wanner, M., Kreuzer, M., 1998. Potential of various fatty feeds to reduce methane release from rumen fermentation in vitro (Rusitec). Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 71, 117-130.

25

33. Martin-Sampedro, R., Capanema, E.A., Hoeger, I., Villar, J.C., Rojas, O.J., 2011. Lignin changes after steam explosion and laccase-mediator treatment of eucalyptus wood chips. J. Agric. Food Chem., 59, 8761-8769. 34. Martín-Sampedro, R., Eugenio, M.E., Villar, J.C., 2012. Effect of steam explosion and enzymatic pre-treatments on pulping and bleaching of Hesperaloe funifera. Bioresour. Technol., 111, 460-467. 35. Menardo, S., Bauer, A., Theuretzbacher, F., Piringer, G., Nilsen, P., Balsari, P., Pavliska, O., Amon, T., 2013. Biogas Production from Steam-Exploded Miscanthus and Utilization of Biogas Energy and CO2 in Greenhouses. Bioenergy Res., 6, 620-630. 36. Pereira Ramos, L., 2003. The chemistry involved in the steam treatment of lignocellulosic materials. Quim. Nova, 26, 863-871. 37. Perez-Elvira, S.I., Sapkaite, I., Fdz-Polanco, F., 2016. Evaluation of thermal steamexplosion key operation factors to optimize biogas production from biological sludge. Water Sci. and Technol., 72, 937-945. 38. Rasmussen, H., Sørensen, H.R., Meyer, A.S., 2014. Formation of degradation compounds from lignocellulosic biomass in the biorefinery: sugar reaction mechanisms. Carbohydr. Res., 385, 45-57. 39. Risberg, K., Sun, L., Levén, L., Horn, S.J., Schnürer, A., 2013. Biogas production from wheat straw and manure - Impact of pretreatment and process operating parameters. Bioresour. Technol., 149, 232-237. 40. Sannigrahi, P., Kim, D.H., Jung, S., Ragauskas, A., 2011. Pseudo-lignin and pretreatment chemistry. Energy and Environ. Sci., 4, 1306-1310. 41. Siddhu, M.A.H., Li, J., Zhang, J., Huang, Y., Wang, W., Chen, C., Liu, G., 2016. Improve the Anaerobic Biodegradability by Copretreatment of Thermal Alkali and Steam Explosion of Lignocellulosic Waste. BioMed Res. Int., 2016. 42. Sluiter, A., Hames, B., Ruiz, R., Scarlata, C., Sluiter, J., Templeton, D., 2008a. Determination of Ash in Biomass. Laboratory Analytical Procedure, NREL/TP-51042622. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colorado, USA. 43. Sluiter, A., Hames, B., Ruiz, R., Scarlat, C., Sluiter, J., Templeton, D., Crocker, D., 2008b. Determination of Structural Carbohydrates and Lignin in Biomass. Laboratory Analytical Procedure, NREL/TP-510-42618. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colorado, USA. 44. Stopp, P., Weichgrebe, D., Rosenwinkel, K., Strecker, M., Breves, G., 2009. Design for separation and augmented methanisation of fibres substrates - contribution to sustainable biogas production. International Research Conference Biogas Science 2009. Vol. 1, Bayerische Landesanstalt für Landwirtschaft, Erding, Germany. 45. Theuretzbacher, F., Lizasoain, J., Lefever, C., Saylor, M.K., Enguidanos, R., Weran, N., Gronauer, A., Bauer, A., 2015. Steam explosion pretreatment of wheat straw to improve methane yields: Investigation of the degradation kinetics of structural compounds during anaerobic digestion. Bioresour. Technol., 179, 299-305. 46. Van Soest, P.J., Wine, R.H., 1967. Use of detergents in the analysis of fibrous feeds. IV. Determination of plant cell-wall constituents. J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem., 50, 50-55. 47. VDI, 2006. VDI 4630 - Fermentation of organic materials. Characterisation of substrate, sampling, collection of material data, fermentation tests. Verein Deutscher Ingenieure. Beuth, Berlin, Germany (2006), 92 p. 48. Vivekanand, V., Olsen, E.F., Eijsink, V.G.H., Horn, S.J., 2013. Effect of different steam explosion conditions on methane potential and enzymatic saccharification of birch. Bioresour. Technol., 127, 343-349.

26

49. Wang, K., Chen, J., Sun, S.-N., Sun, R.-C., 2015. Steam Explosion, in: Pandey, A., Negi, S., Binod, P., Larroche, C. (Eds.) Pretreatment of Biomass. Elsevier. Amsterdam, pp. 75-104. 50. Zhuang, J., Wang, X., Xu, J., Wang, Z., Qin, M., 2017. Formation and deposition of pseudo-lignin on liquid-hot-water-treated wood during cooling process. Wood Sci. Technol., 51, 165-174.

27

Figure captions Figure 1. Linear relationship between the contents of AIL and hemicellulose. Figure 2. Specific biogas and methane yields of untreated and pretreated corn stover. Figure 3 (a) Biodegradation kinetics of acid insoluble lignin (AIL), cellulose (CEL) and hemicellulose (H-CEL) in untreated corn stover Figure 3 (b). Biodegradation kinetics of acid insoluble lignin (AIL), cellulose (CEL) and hemicellulose (H-CEL) in corn stover pretreated at 140 °C for 5 min Figure 3 (c). Biodegradation kinetics of acid insoluble lignin (AIL), cellulose (CEL) and hemicellulose (H-CEL) in corn stover pretreated at 180 °C for 5 min

28

Tables Table 1: Summary of chemical analyses Pretreatment

pH

DM

VS

[% FM]

[% DM]

CEL

H-CEL

AIL

XP

WSF

[% VS]

Untreated

7.5

86.0

94.3

39.0

26.6

17.3

3.5

12.5

140 °C, 2 minutes

6.7

45.5

93.3

40.9

27.4

17.9

3.2

15.1

140 °C, 5 minutes

6.4

42.7

92.2

40.5

27.2

16.8

4.0

19.0

140 °C, 10 minutes

6.6

33.0

94.6

40.1

27.8

17.9

3.1

17.3

140 °C, 15 minutes

6.4

18.9

91.8

41.2

28.6

18.6

3.8

19.8

160 °C, 2 minutes

6.9

51.1

91.6

39.4

26.9

17.6

3.9

18.3

160 °C, 5 minutes

6.6

43.4

93.4

38.7

27.2

17.8

3.4

23.5

160 °C, 10 minutes

6.4

32.2

91.5

35.8

22.7

19.5

3.7

22.5

160 °C, 15 minutes

6.5

29.2

94.2

38.0

24.3

18.8

3.4

25.3

180 °C, 2 minutes

6.7

51.6

93.5

39.8

27.3

17.9

3.5

24.0

180 °C, 5 minutes

6.5

45.3

92.4

40.3

28.0

18.4

3.7

27.3

180 °C, 10 minutes

6.3

31.6

92.6

40.3

25.9

19.8

3.9

27.5

180 °C, 15 minutes

6.1

22.6

91.5

39.8

24.8

19.3

4.3

32.5

200 °C, 2 minutes

6.2

49.3

94.0

38.1

25.4

18.3

3.6

27.0

200 °C, 5 minutes

5.2

35.6

93.6

40.2

22.3

21.5

3.7

36.9

200 °C, 10 minutes

4.2

28.0

92.8

44.1

12.7

26.6

4.1

36.9

200 °C, 15 minutes

4.2

20.3

91.8

44.7

7.1

32.7

4.8

41.8

220 °C, 2 minutes

4.7

37.8

92.1

42.0

19.3

23.5

4.3

38.9

220 °C, 5 minutes

4.0

34.9

91.2

42.2

3.0

34.5

5.0

n.a.

220 °C, 10 minutes

3.9

28.7

91.6

36.1

1.2

42.2

5.0

42.0

220 °C, 15 minutes

4.2

24.2

90.8

30.3

1.0

43.8

5.4

51.6

DM: dry matter; FM: fresh matter; VS: volatile solids; CEL: cellulose; H-CEL: hemicellulose; AIL: acid insoluble lignin; XP: crude protein; WSF: water soluble fraction; n.a.: not analyzed

29

Figures

50 45 40

AIL [% VS]

35 30 25 20 15

y = -0.8426x + 40.414 R² = 0.951

10 5 0 0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Hemicellulose [% VS]

Figure 1

30

650 Biogas

Methane

600 550 500 450

L kg -1 VS

400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0

Figure 2

31

CEL

Methane

H-CEL

300

80%

250 200

60%

150 40%

100 20%

50

0%

Cumulative methane (L Kg -1 VS)

Biomass composition (%)

AIL 100%

0 0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

Time (days)

Figure 3 (a)

32

CEL

H-CEL

Methane 300

80%

250 200

60%

150 40%

100 20%

50

0%

Cumulative methane (L Kg-1 VS)

Biomass composition (%)

AIL 100%

0 0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

Time (days)

Figure 3 (b)

33

CEL

H-CEL

Methane 300

80%

250 200

60%

150 40%

100 20%

50

0%

Cumulative methane (L Kg -1 VS)

Biomass composition (%)

AIL 100%

0 0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

Time (days)

Figure 3 (c)

34

Include 3 to 5 bullet points (maximum 85 characters, including spaces, per bullet point).

►Corn stover was pretreated with steam explosion from 140 °C to 220 °C for 2 to 15 min ►Pretreatment at 160 °C for 2 min improved 22% the methane yield ►Harsh pretreatments induced reduction of methane yield and promoted pseudo-lignin ►Steam explosion enhanced the biodegradation of structural carbohydrates and lignin

35