PhysicaC 162-164 (1989) 1655-1656 No~h-HoRand
CORRELATION
R.S.
OF H I G H - T c S U P E R C O N D U C T I V I T Y
M A R K I E W I C Z a'c and B.C.
WITH DENSITY
OF STATES
G I E S S E N b'c
Depts. of P h y s i c s (a) and C h e m i s t r y (b), ann~ N o r t h e a s t e r n U n i v e r s i t y , Boston, M A 02115, USA"
some
recognized
time that
or,
hole
oxide
either
as
CuO 2
La2_xSrxCUO4,
doping. 5
as
a
Recently,
a
of T c w i t h d o p i n g
the d a t a 6,7
[For
the
density
found
new
a peak,
n, the n u m b e r
plane.
been
by
same
the
density
so
that
of
this
assumption
Ref.
n
Ref.
the
The
adjusting
In
this
agrees
simple once e.g., the
of
of h o l e s density it
for
this
is
that Tc
on
can
n
of
of
direct
the both
=
states that
hole-hole
two-dimensional
1
(dos)
and as
a
effect,
because
of,
hopping, 9-II van
of
Hove
in p a r t by D O D - S D I O
under
the
by
1
The
of
to of
Fermi with
insensitive ~;
a
for
by
was
chosen
so t h a t
a
change as
n-values.
i0
predicts
ground
state
is
to
an
(N
Formula particular
~
can
in
V.
and
can
= 1
0) is
value
of
compensated
at the
formula
from IGC Corp.
be For
60 meV,
A = N V = 0.56
McMillan-type
for the shift
respect
in
tcu_o
to_ O has
insulator
to the
change
and
higher
half-filling.
(Cu-O
(direct O-O
but
Ref.
liquid
(Cu-O
eV
AE
i0,
to a c c o u n t
peak
eV
1.2
values Ref.
band
correlations,
=
antiferromagnetic near
of us I0 to
and to_ O = 1.2 eV
from
N
band
CuO 2
AE = 5.2
tCu_O
dos
the
one
strong
calculation
a subcontract
0921--4534/89/$03.50 © Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. (North-Holland)
by
and
a model
coupled
increased
that
A Supported
Fig.
BCS-like
potential
from
bare parameters
are t a k e n been
pairing
a
unstable
observed stage
a
(i)
calculated
separation),
The
band.]
be u n d e r s t o o d
realized
structure
hopping).
material).
to the h a l f - f i l l e d
believe
dependence number
x
seen
from h a l f
in
from
obtained
describe
with
consistency
be
representation,
corresponds We
+
is the dos
hopping),
at n =
1
V
the
the
t h a t the L a 2 _ x S r x C U O 4 data p e a k s =
is
with
noting
(n
where
have
by
1.15
~ e -1/NV,
data
for
curve
T c = 1.14
all
peak
away
formula
were
and
solid
calculated
here
the
can
The
occurs
Tc
given
materials
7.
6,
filling. shows
(vHs)
renormalized
mass,
that
layer
of
that
effective
double-Cu
of h o l e s p e r CuO 2
values
assuming
the
in Fig. 1 as T c
data
singularity
copper oxide a d e n s i t y of
has
in o t h e r h i g h - T c m a t e r i a l s . 6-
8 We r e p l o t against
has
of s u c c e s s i v e
in
of h o l e
seen
the
shows
similar variation been
of
of n u m b e r
layers, I-4 function
it
Tc
superconductors a function
now,
(c),
Institute
Barnett
The v a r i a t i o n of T_ w i t h hole concentration in the superconductors can ~readily be u n d e r s t o o d in t e r m s of s t a t e s p e a k s p l i t by i n t e r l a y e r interaction.
For
PEAKS
Fig. V
i,
adjusted dos
peak.
provide
a
R.S. Markiewicz and B. C G iessen / Correlation o f high-To superconductivity
1656
150
,
shows
,
copper
To(K) I00
~~ +
• °y
the
oxide
described
by
value
6E.
the o
that
of
Tc(n)
curves
for
superconductors Eq.
I,
(For
splitting would
varying the
all
can
be
only
the
L a 2 _ x S r x C U O 4,
have
to
be
due
to
I
_I+o-
~l +
intercell
+
large and
coupling.
splitting
it may
be
is that
In this rather too
case,
the
surprising,
is
smaller
in
this material.)
0
oJ': ........
I
Note that I
i .....
1.2 n 1.4
1.6
........
fit,
but
at
the
i.e.,
cost
The
differences
among
of
xSrxCuO4 ,
YBa2Cu307_ 6
Tl-families) shown
in
in
I.
compounds,
In
accounting
it for
is
axis
is
induced
In the
properly
Amer. 21 to
2.
H. Ihara, (1988).
3.
P. Haldar, et al., 1198 (1988).
Science
241,
4.
A.W. Sleight, S c i e n c e 24~, (1988), S. Nakajima, et Physica C 158, 471 (1989).
1519 al.,
5.
J.B. T o r r a n c e et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 1127 (1988).
6.
Y.J. Uemura, et al., Phys. Lett. 62, 2317 (1989).
7.
W. U r l a n d and F. Tietz, Commun. 69, 995 (1989).
8.
M.H. Whangbo, D.B. Kang, and C.C. Torardi, Physica C 158, 371 (1989).
9.
R.S. Markiewicz, to be published, J.Phys. Cond. Matt.
i0.
R.S. Markiewicz,
ii.
E.B. Phys.
et al, N a t u r e ~ 4 ,
510
Rev.
Sol. St.
a
the
conduction
two-Cu-layer by
high-T c of
6E.
into
is two
Fig.
1
Stechel and D.R. Jennison, Rev. B38, 4632, 8873
(1988).
this
system
band 2
unpublished.
coupling)
result
for
separated
R.M. Hazen, p r e s e n t e d at Phys. Soc. M a r c h Meeting, 25 March, 1988.
even if c-
the
coupling sub-bands
i.
interlayer to
intercell
to
split
that
(three-dimensional
by
explain
a
layered
intracell
negligible.
superconductors
and
of
known
essential
dispersion
can
intercalation
is
d e s c r i b e the Fermi surfaces, effects
model
explained
of
graphite
compounds, 12
Bi
studies
family
present
(La 2_
the
easily
the
i) --
REFERENCES
various
i n t e r l a y e r coupling,
Fig.
closely-related
coupling
and
are m o s t
by d i f f e r e n c e s as
the
superconductors
coupling
e l e c t r o n s u p e r c o n d u c t i v i t y as well.
of
a d d i t i o n a l parameters. families
interlayer
the vHs p e a k can shift
to n < 1 (see d o t t e d line in Fig.
Fig. i. T c vs hole c o n c e n t r a t i o n for copper oxide superconductors. Data: x = La2_xSrxCuO4; O = YBa2Cu307-6 and o t h e r 2-Cu l a y e r m a t e r i a l s ; • = 3-Cu l a y e r s --all from Ref. 6; + = Bi 2-Cu layer m a t e r i a l s , from Ref. 7. Lines = theoretical fits w i t h 6E = 0 (solid line); 40 m e V (dashed line); 160 m e V (dot-dash), and 600 m e V (dotted), and o t h e r p a r a m e t e r s as d i s c u s s e d in text.
better
if the
is large enough,
12.
R.S. Markiewicz Giessen, Mod. Phys. 723 (1989).
and Lett.
B.C. B. ~,