Journal Pre-proof Correlations between the phenolic and fibre composition of mushrooms and the glycaemic and textural characteristics of mushroom enriched extruded products Xikun Lu, Margaret A. Brennan, Joan Narciso, Wenqiang Guan, Jie Zhang, Li Yuan, Luca Serventi, Charles S. Brennan PII:
S0023-6438(19)31072-2
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2019.108730
Reference:
YFSTL 108730
To appear in:
LWT - Food Science and Technology
Received Date: 6 March 2018 Revised Date:
30 September 2019
Accepted Date: 10 October 2019
Please cite this article as: Lu, X., Brennan, M.A., Narciso, J., Guan, W., Zhang, J., Yuan, L., Serventi, L., Brennan, C.S., Correlations between the phenolic and fibre composition of mushrooms and the glycaemic and textural characteristics of mushroom enriched extruded products, LWT - Food Science and Technology (2019), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2019.108730. This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. © 2019 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
4
Correlations between the phenolic and fibre composition of mushrooms and the glycaemic and textural characteristics of mushroom enriched extruded products
5
Xikun Lu
6
Serventi , Charles S. Brennan
1
2
3
a,b,c
a
a
7
8
a
a
b
d
d
, Margaret A. Brennan , Joan Narciso , Wenqiang Guan , Jie Zhang , Li Yuan , Luca a,b,c
*
Department of Wine, Food and Molecular Biosciences, Lincoln University, P O Box 84, Lincoln 7647,
Christchurch, New Zealand b
Tianjin Key Laboratory of Food Biotechnology, College of Biotechnology and Food Sciences, Tianjin
9
10
University of Commerce, Tianjin, China c
11
Riddet Institute, Palmerston North, New Zealand
d
12
13
Institute of Food Science and Technology, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key Laboratory
of Agro-products Processing, Ministry of Agriculture, Beijing 100193, China
14
15
*Correspondent: E-mail:
[email protected]; postal address: department of Wine, Food
16
and Molecular Biosciences, Lincoln University, P O Box 84, Lincoln 7647, Christchurch, New Zealand
17
E-mail addresses:
[email protected] (X.K. Lu),
[email protected] (M.A.
18
Brennan),
[email protected] (J. Narciso),
[email protected] (W.Q. Guan),
19
[email protected] (J. Zhang),
[email protected] (L. Yuan),
[email protected] (L. Serventi),
20
[email protected] (C.S. Brennan).
21
1
22
Abstract
23
In this study, semolina extruded snack products were supplemented with white
24
button mushroom (Agaricus bisporus), shiitake (Lentinula edodes) and porcini
25
mushrooms (Boletus edulis). The functional properties of the products were analysed,
26
including the nutritional profile, starch characteristics (content, gelatinization and
27
digestibility) and antioxidant activities (total phenolic content, DPPH and ORAC),
28
colour, and textural properties. Compared to the control samples,
29
supplemented with mushroom powder showed a reduced product expansion,
30
decreased water absorption index, increased water solubility index and altered
31
microstructure characteristics. Differences in starch gelatinization and starch
32
hydrolysis resulted in a reduced predictive glycaemic response value for mushroom
33
supplemented extrudates. Inclusion of mushroom material resulted in higher levels
34
of phenolic compounds and antioxidants.
extrudates
35
36
Keywords: mushroom; hot extruded snack; glycaemic index; antioxidant capacity
37
38
1. Introduction
39
Hot extrusion is a thermal process that includes mixing, forming, texturizing and
40
cooking (Brennan, Derbyshire, Tiwari, & Brennan, 2013). The popularity of hot
41
extruded snack products is increasing due to their puffy, crisp and crunchy textures
42
(Wani & Kumar, 2016). Most extruded snacks are derived from cereals and are often 2
43
nutritionally unbalanced; for example, they are low in vitamins, minor minerals,
44
dietary fibre, essential amino acids and other bioactive compounds (Brennan et al.,
45
2013). These products exhibit increased starch digestibility attributed to starch
46
gelatinisation and fragmentation by the shearing process, and are treated as high
47
glycaemic index foods (Brennan et al., 2013). The addition of bioactive
48
phytochemicals provides can improve their nutritional components (Wani & Kumar,
49
2016).
50
51
52
Mushrooms are good sources of protein, bioactive polysaccharides, vitamins, minor
53
minerals, dietary fibre and unsaturated fatty acids (Lu, Brennan, Serventi, Mason, &
54
Brennan, 2016). In particular, they contain ergothioneine, which humans cannot
55
synthesise themselves (Weigand-Heller, Kris-Etherton, & Beelman, 2012).
56
White button mushroom (Agaricus bisporus) is the most commonly consumed edible
57
mushroom in the US and European countries (Breece, 1990). Shiitake (Lentinula
58
edodes) and porcini mushrooms (Boletus edulis) are regarded as specialty
59
mushrooms.
60
61
Recently, attention has focused on the use of mushroom bioactive ingredients in
62
functional food products and how consumers perceive these products (Tepsongkroh
63
et al., 2019). For instance mushroom materials have been used as nanoparticles to
64
be included in the food industry as effective functional food ingredients (Wang et al., 3
65
2018). Jin et al. (2018) illustrated that ingredients from Pleurotus eryngii could be
66
used to reduce post-prandial cholesterol levels. The challenge is how to ultilise these
67
ingredients in food systems rather than just in isolated forms, and how the antioxidant and
68
bioactive ingredients could be used for human nutrition (Adebayo et al., 2018; Li et al.,
69
2018). Mushroom materials have been used in bread and pasta product to enrich the
70
protein and fibre contents to great effect (Lu et al., 2018) and also in snack food products
71
(Vallée et al., 2017). In a recent study, researchers have also used shitake mushrooms
72
in muffins in order to increase the phenolic content of muffins and improve the nutritional
73
quality of these foods (Olawuyi and Lee, 2019). The benefits of such inclusions coming
74
from the bioactive ingredients found in the mushroom materials (Bach et al., 2017; Vital et
75
al., 2017)
76
77
The objectives of the current study were to determine how inclusion of mushroom
78
bioactive compounds alters the physical, textural and nutritional properties of
79
extruded products.
80
81
2. Material and methods
82
2.1 Materials
83
Commercial semolina (Sun Valley Foods, Auckland, New Zealand), dried shiitake
84
mushroom and porcini mushroom sliced (Jade Phoenix, Guangzhou, China) and fresh
85
white button mushroom (Meadow Mushrooms, Christchurch, New Zealand) were 4
86
used.
87
88
2.2 Extrusion processing
89
Extruded products were produced using a single screw extruder (screw
90
configurations being: screw length: 30 cm, screw diameter: 30 mm, barrel length 300
91
mm, inside screw shaft diameter 30 mm, outside screw shaft diameter 40 mm, die
92
diameter 3 mm) obtained from Northern finance Ltd (MM1, Auckland, New Zealand).
93
Table 1 summarizes operating details. Expanded snack products were collected,
94
cooled and stored in sealed polyethylene bags at room temperature for further
95
analysis.
96
97
Nine samples supplemented with mushroom powder were produced by substituting
98
durum wheat semolina with white button mushroom, shiitake mushroom and porcini
99
mushroom powder respectively. The level of mushroom powder replacement for
100
flour was at 5 g/100 g, 10 g/100 g and 15 g/100 g (w/w) of semolina flour
101
respectively with a control reference being exclusively durum wheat semolina (Fig.
102
1-supplementary).
103
104
2.3 Near infrared spectroscopy
105
Near infrared spectra of ground extruded products was determined using Calorie
5
106
AnswerTM (CA-HM, JWP, Japan) according to the method reported by (Lau, Goh, Quek,
107
Lim, & Henry, 2016): the wavelength ranged from 1100-2200×10-9 m, the resolution
108
was 7.5×10-9 m, and the data interval was 2.0×10-9 m. The reflectance mode was
109
used for the powders, and the reference reflectance was analysed by a calcium
110
carbonate filled cell. Samples were scanned in cylindrical sample cell and the
111
powdered cereals and dried noodles mode of the machine was selected as the
112
analysis setting. Each triplicate portion was scanned 10 times. The averaged mean
113
spectrum was obtained in order to improve accuracy by the inbuilt computer
114
software (CA-HM Measurement Application Software, JWP, Japan). All the data was
115
transformed into log 1/R and the calorie content was calculated according to the
116
regression expressions pre-programmed by this software, which was in accordance
117
with the selected setting for analysis.
118
119
2.4 Physicochemical characteristics
120
The hardness and crunchiness of all extruded products were analysed using a TA-XT2
121
Texture Analyzer (Stable Micro Systems, Surrey, UK). An aluminum cylinder probe of
122
25 mm diameter was used with a test speed of 1 mm/s at a trigger force of 5 g and
123
the extruded samples were compressed to 50% of original height. The peak force
124
recorded represented the hardness of the product, whereas the number of fracture
125
peaks represented crunchiness. All measurements were performed for a minimum of
126
12 samples (Brennan et al., 2013).
6
127
128
The extruded samples were measured for their length (le), diameter (De) and mass
129
(me) using 20 pieces of hot extruded from each treatment. The radial expansion ratio
130
of the extruded samples (ER) and specific length of the samples (lsp) were obtained
131
by the formulas below (Karkle, Keller, Dogan, & Alavi, 2012): 1
=
132
2
=
(
/ )
133
where Dd = die diameter (3 mm).
134
The product density and the percentage expansion of samples (using the formula
135
below) were calculated following the method of Brennan et al., (2013): 3 % Expansion =
× 100
136
The water absorption index (WAI) and water solubility index (WSI) were determined
137
by the method described by Anderson, Conway, & Peplinski, (1970). The moisture
138
content of samples were analysed according to the air-oven method at 105℃ (AACC,
139
2010).
140
141
Total dietary fibre (TDF) content was determined in duplicate using a Total Dietary
142
Fibre assay kit (Megazyme International Ireland Ltd, Wicklow, Ireland).
143
Measurements were recorded for soluble (SDF) and insoluble fibre (IDF) composition
144
as described by Brennan et al. (2013). The protein content was determined using a 7
145
Rapid Max N exceed (Elementar, Langenselbold, Germany) using the conversion
146
factor of 6.25.
147
148
2.5 Colour
149
The colour of all extruded samples was measured using a colorimeter CR-210
150
(Minolta, Tokyo, Japan). The results were expressed using the L*, a* and b* values.
151
The total colour difference ∆E* between the control and mushroom enriched
152
samples was determined by the following formula: 4 ∆
∗
= #∆$∗ + ∆&∗ + ∆' ∗
153
154
2.6 Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC)
155
Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC; TA Q20, TA Instruments, Newcastle, DE) was
156
used to measure the starch gelatinisation characteristics of hot extruded samples
157
using the method reported by Aravind, Sissons, Egan, & Fellows, (2012). Samples (4-6
158
mg) were weighed into a hermetic DSC pan with 10 µl of water,
159
hermetically sealed and allowed to equilibrate overnight at room temperature. The
160
reference was an empty pan and lid which was pressed together. The samples were
161
heated from 10 ℃ to 110 ℃ at a rate of 10 ℃/min. A DSC heating curve was
162
generated in this process, and measurements were done in duplicate. Temperatures
163
of onset (Tonset), gelatinisation (peak), endset (Tendset) and the enthalpy of the
8
samples were
164
transition (∆H) were obtained in this process.
165
166
2.7 Total phenolic content and antioxidant capabilities
167
Total phenolic content (TPC) of all samples was measured using 0.2 N Folin-Ciocalteu
168
reagent (Sigma, St Louis, USA) according to the method reported by Singleton & Rossi
169
(1965). The results were expressed as gallic equivalent per gram dry weight. The
170
ability of all the samples to scavenge DPPH (1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl) radical was
171
determined as described by Floegel, Kim, Chung, Koo, & Chun
172
were expressed as micromoles of Trolox per gram dry weight. The oxygen radical
173
absorbance capacity-fluorescence assay (ORAC) was carried out using the method
174
described by Thaipong, Boonprakob, Crosby, Cisneros-Zevallos, & Hawkins Byrne
175
(2006). The results were expressed as micromoles of Trolox per gram dry weight.
(2011). The results
176
177
2.8 Starch content and in vitro starch digestibility analysis
178
Total starch was determined using the Total Starch assay kit (Star) from Megazyme
179
International (Wicklow, Ireland).
180
181
The potential amount of glucose released over 120 min was conducted for each
182
pasta type was conducted as described previously Foschia, Peressini, Sensidoni,
183
Brennan, & Brennan (2015). The amount of reducing sugars released were recorded
9
184
at 0, 20, 60 and 120 min during the digestion process. The glucose released curves
185
could be obtained and then the areas under the curve (AUC) could be measured by
186
the trapezoid rule.
187
188
2.9 Microscopy
189
The microstructure of the extruded products was evaluated by scanning electron
190
microscope (SEM, Joel 75, Tokyo, Japan). Samples were coated with gold using a
191
MCI000 Ion Sputter Coater, then were viewed using a SU8010 SEM at 500×
192
magnification level.
193
194
2.10 Statistical analysis
195
Unless stated elsewhere, the experiments were performed in triplicate. Statistical
196
differences were determined by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s
197
comparison test (p ≤ 0.05). Pearson’s correlations were also carried out to analyse
198
the significant correlations at p ≤ 0.05, p ≤ 0.01, and p ≤ 0.001, respectively.
199
200
3. Results and discussion
201
3.1 Near-infrared spectroscopy
202
The fat, carbohydrate, water and calorie contents of the control and mushroom 10
203
supplemented hot extruded samples were measured using a Calorie AnswerTM
204
machine which has been calibrated or cereal and vegetable products (Table 2).
205
206
The carbohydrate content of most of the mushroom enriched samples did not show
207
any significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) from the control. The fat content of all the
208
mushroom extruded products was significantly higher (p ≤ 0.05) than that the control
209
extruded sample, and increased with increasing mushroom powder content. Lu et al.
210
(2016) had previously shown that all three mushroom species contained more fat
211
than semolina on a dry weight basis: (white button (2.42 ± 0.04 %), shiitake
212
mushroom (1.48 ± 0.02 %), porcini mushroom (3.03 ± 0.03 %) and semolina (1.17 ±
213
0.09 %)).
214
215
The addition of mushroom powder increased the samples’ energy compared to the
216
control (Table 2). Such an increase may be attributed to increased fat content.
217
Significant positive correlation (Table 3) exists between sample energy and fat
218
content (r=0.857, at p≤0.001).
219
220
3.2 Physicochemical properties
221
The expansion ratio of the three different mushroom species of enriched samples
222
showed an inverse relationship with the amount of enriched mushroom powder
223
incorporated. These results were all significantly lower, or similar, to the control
11
224
except for the 5 % white button mushroom substitution (Table 4). All three
225
mushroom species contained higher total dietary fibre than semolina (as shown in
226
Table 4). The IDF and TDF contents of mushroom enriched products increased
227
significantly (p≤0.05) and proportional to substitution levels compared to the
228
control (Table 2). Such higher dietary fibre contents and the relative absence of
229
starch could decrease the free water of the raw materials in the extruder barrel. This,
230
in turn, may limit the expansion of the products as reported previously (Brennan et
231
al., 2013). This hypothesis is confirmed by the negative correlations between the
232
expansion of sample and all IDF, SDF and TDF values (Table 3). The reduced
233
expansion ratio of the mushroom enriched samples may also be due to the higher fat
234
contents in the mushroom powder than in the semolina which may reduce the
235
extrudate viscosity and, consequently, reduce the pressure difference the pre- and
236
post- the die face as mentioned by Robin, Dubois, Pineau, Schuchmann, & Palzer,
237
(2011). Table 3 demonstrates negative correlation between sample expansion and fat
238
content (r=-0.420, p≤0.05). Generally, the sample density showed an inverse trend
239
of expansion ratio in this study (r=-0.669, p≤0.001); this supports the work of Karkle
240
et al., (2012). However, the specific length of the extruded samples increased
241
compared to the control. Some researchers have reported similar results, showing
242
that the inclusion of fibre rich materials resulted in increased longitudinal expansion
243
(Karkle et al., 2012). This observation is consistent with that of Table 3 illustrating
244
positive correlations between the specific length and both IDF and TDF (r=0.888,
245
0.858, respectively, at p≤ 0.001). A significant positive correlation is observed 12
246
between specific length and fat content (Table 3). This phenomenon may be
247
explained by the reduced viscosity caused by enriched lipids or other ingredients
248
changing the expansion direction.
249
250
Water absorption index (WAI) values of the supplemented samples decreased
251
significantly (p≤0.05) compared to the control. In contrast, the water solubility index
252
(WSI) values of the white button enriched samples increased slightly and the other
253
two mushroom samples increased significantly when compared to the control (Table
254
4). The WAI results were similar to previous observations, investigating the influence
255
of the inclusion of chestnut mushroom co-products on extruded snack products,
256
where the WAI values decreased with increasing levels of substitution (Brennan et al.,
257
2013). Table 3 illustrates negative correlations between WAI and the proportion of
258
IDF, SDF and TDF. WAI relates to the proportion of intact starch granules that were
259
fully gelatinized; researchers have shown a positive relationship between the degree
260
of starch fragmentation and gelatinisation and the WAI (Brahma, Weier, & Rose,
261
2016). This fact is further supported by the significant negative correlation between
262
∆H and WAI (r=-0.7, p≤0.001) found in this study (Table 3). A higher WAI is an
263
indication of shorter starch chains arising from the fragmentation of the long chains
264
during shearing during extrusion; the shorter chains having stronger solubility
265
capacity (Hagenimana, Ding, & Fang, 2006). Table 3 illustrates a positive correlation
266
between starch content and WAI (r=0.634, r≤0.001). The starch contents of the
267
three mushroom powders were much lower than those of semolina (semolina (73.11 13
268
± 1.17 %); white button (1.90 ± 0.02 %); shiitake mushroom (2.45 ± 0.14 %] and
269
porcine mushroom (2.62 ± 0.08 %) on a dry weight basis). The WSI indicates the
270
amount of soluble starch present after extrusion (Brahma et al., 2016). There were
271
positive correlations between the WSI and both IDF and TDF (r=0.747 and 0.759,
272
respectively, at p≤0.001). One can suggest that the additional mushroom fibre may
273
interrupt the protein and starch networks, thus increasing the WSI. The WAI was
274
inversely related to the WSI values in this study (r=-0.513, p≤0.01) and a similar
275
finding has been reported by (Pęksa et al., 2016). Interestingly, Pęksa and others
276
(2016) reported that there was no obvious relationship between WAI and the
277
textural attributes of the hot extruded samples. However, Table 3 illustrates a
278
significant positive correlation between WAI and sample expansion, and negative
279
correlations between WAI and both sample density and specific.
280
281
3.3 Textural properties
282
The structure of an extruded sample illustrate the presence of an outer area, formed
283
by a layer of collapsed gas cells, which was relatively hard, as well as an inner section,
284
formed by gas cells, which was brittle. In this way, the integrity of the outer coat
285
formation and the expansion extent of the extrudate determines the textural
286
characteristics (Brennan et al., 2013). The hardness of extrudates with white button
287
mushroom decreased initially then increased compared to the control; shiitake
288
mushroom samples decreased significantly (p≤0.05) with increasing incorporation
14
289
levels; porcini mushroom substitution showed no obvious difference from the control
290
(Fig. 2-supplementary). Previously research illustrated differences in protein and
291
carbohydrate affects moisture, molecular gelatinisation, starch degradation, and the
292
textural quality of product (Korkerd, Wanlapa, Puttanlek, Uttapap, & Rungsardthong,
293
2015). Inclusion of high amounts of protein and dietary fibre into extruded products
294
increase hardness (Korkerd et al., 2015), as observed in the results of the white
295
button mushroom samples. Crunchiness was inversely correlated to hardness (Table
296
3, r=-0.973, at p≤0.001). Table 3 demonstrates positive correlations between
297
crunchiness and expansion (r=0.620, p≤0.001), radial expansion (r=0.613, p≤0.001)
298
and specific length (r=0.399, p≤0.05).
299
300
3.4 Colour
301
Table 1-supplementary illustrates that the lightness/darkness (L*) of some of the
302
mushroom enriched samples decreased significantly (p≤0.05) compared to the
303
control. The lower L* values may due to the reduced expansion and porosity due to
304
moisture retention induced by increased fibre content of the extrudates instead of
305
chemical reactions (Yu, Ramaswamy, & Boye,
306
yellowness (b*) values increased compared to the control, possibly due to the higher
307
protein levels in the formulations and the effects of protein degradation. All three
308
mushroom samples provided more protein to the final products than semolina
309
(semolina [11.32 ± 0.28 %]; white button [30.52 ± 0.13 %]; shiitake mushroom [15.04
15
2013). Both the redness (a*) and
310
± 0.04 %] and porcini mushroom [23.83 ± 0.19 %] on a dry weight basis).
311
Furthermore, the other factors involved in these colour differences may be the
312
Maillard reactions during the hot extrusion process or the oxidation of mushroom fat
313
under thermal treatment.
314
315
3.5 Thermal properties
316
The ∆H values of most of the products were zero, indicating that the hot extrusion
317
treatment resulted in complete starch gelatinisation or dextrinization, and protein
318
denaturation (no peaks) (Ai, Cichy, Harte, Kelly, & Ng, 2016) (Table 2-supplementary).
319
A negative correlation existed between ∆H and starch content (r=-0.597, p≤0.001).
320
In addition, the 10 %, 15 % shiitake mushroom and 15 % porcini mushroom enriched
321
samples had low ∆H values. These results showed a similar trend to that of the total
322
dietary fibre contents in semolina and the other mushroom powders. Positive
323
correlations were observed between ∆H and IDF (r=0.739; p≤0.001), SDF (r=0.550; p
324
≤0.01) and TDF (r=0.803; p≤0.001). Research had previously shown correlations
325
between the inclusion of insoluble dietary fibre and an increase of DSC parameters
326
(Aravind et al., 2012). This is similar to our observations.
327
328
3.6 Total phenolic contents and antioxidant capabilities
329
The total phenolic content and antioxidant activities of the control and mushroom
16
330
enriched extruded samples were studied (Fig. 1). The inclusion of mushroom powder
331
into extruded snacks had a significant (p≤0.05) effect on increasing the total
332
phenolic contents and antioxidant activities of the samples. According to Fig. 1, the
333
results of the total phenolic contents and the DPPH and ORAC assays showed similar
334
trends. Table 3 illustrates positive correlations between TPC and both DPPH and
335
ORAC values (r=0.973 and 0.822, respectively; p≤0.001). The relationship between
336
the total phenolic contents of the samples and their antioxidant activities agreed
337
with several earlier reports (Jaworska, Pogon, Skrzypczak, & Bernas, 2015). Edible
338
mushrooms have been proven to play an important role in protection against oxidant
339
stress and the inhibition of cancerous cells (like HT-29 cells) (Sanchez, Jimenez-Perez,
340
Liedo, 2015). The antioxidant properties of edible mushrooms were due to
341
phytochemicals such as gallic acid, ascorbic acid, tocopherols, flavonoids, carotenoids
342
and selenium (Jaworska et al., 2008). Furthermore, mushrooms are a good source of
343
ergothioneine. This sulfur amino acid could act as an antioxidant, and is present in
344
levels of up to 0.4-2.0 mg/g in dry mushrooms (Weigand-Heller et al., 2012). The
345
antioxidant activity of ergothinoeine is based on multiple mechanisms among which
346
the capability to scavenge free radicals was quite powerful. This may explain the
347
increased DPPH scavenging activity and oxygen radical absorbance capacity of the
348
mushroom enriched samples in this study. Positive correlations were observed
349
between fat content and TPC (r=0.520, p≤0.01), DPPH (r=0.581, p≤0.001) and
350
ORAC (r=0.784, p≤0.001). Table 3 also indicates that there were positive correlations
351
between antioxidant capabilities (DPPH and ORAC) and all IDF, SDF and TDF fibre 17
352
contents, even though no correlation was observed between ORAC and SDF.
353
According to Fig. 1, under the same substitution levels there were significant (p≤
354
0.05) differences between different species of mushroom enriched samples. The
355
different antioxidant components and other bioactive compounds of the different
356
mushroom species played important roles in this observation. In this study, positive
357
correlations existed between protein content and antioxidant activities, whereas
358
negative correlations existed between starch content and both DPPH and ORAC
359
values (Table 3). During hot extrusion processing the raw materials suffered from
360
high temperatures and this tended to decrease the total phenolics compounds and
361
antioxidant capacities of the samples because of the increased oxidation of the total
362
phenolics (Korkerd et al., 2015). Little work has been undertaken to study the effect
363
of hot extrusion on mushroom bioactivity, that the correlations reported in this
364
paper are valuable in understanding such relationships.
365
366
3.7 The starch content and in vitro digestibility
367
According to Fig. 2, the addition of mushroom powder into extruded products
368
lowered the starch contents compared to the control. With the increasing amounts
369
of mushroom powder, the starch content decreased gradually, as shown by the
370
results of the semolina and mushroom starch contents. Negative correlations were
371
observed between starch content and fat, protein, IDF and TDF contents (p≤0.001),
372
and this suggests that the higher protein, fat and dietary fibre contents of mushroom
18
373
materials diluted the starch within the mushroom enriched samples.
374
375
The reducing sugars released from mushroom enriched products over 120 min of in
376
vitro digestion were lower than that of the control. The concentration-time curve
377
(AUC) bar chart represented this trend more clearly (Figs. 2 and Fig.
378
3-supplementary), illustrating that with increased mushroom contents, the AUC
379
values of extrudates decreased significantly (p≤0.05). This observation could be
380
confirmed by the strong positive correlation between AUC and starch content
381
(r=0.826; p≤0.001) found in this study. Rapidly digested starch (RDS) is the starch
382
digested in the first 20 min, which rapidly increases the blood glucose levels (Englyst,
383
Kingman, & Cummings, 1992). According to Fig. 3-supplementary, all the mushroom
384
enriched snack samples (except at the 5 % substitution level) had lower RDS levels
385
compared to the control. Slowly digested starch (SDS) is the amount of starch
386
completely digested in 20 to 120 min in the human small intestine (Englyst et al.,
387
1992). Inclusion of mushroom powder reduced the SDS fractions of the hot extruded
388
products. Thus, the decrease in the predicted glycaemic response may be attributed
389
to the higher amounts of resistant starch (RS) in the mushroom enriched samples.
390
Previous research illustrated that when chestnut mushroom co-products were added
391
to hot extruded snack products a reduction in glucose was observed throughout the
392
digestion (Brennan, Derbyshire, Tiwari, & Brennan, 2012). According to Table 2,
393
mushroom enriched samples contained significantly higher contents of IDF and TDF
394
than control. Many authors have reported that fibre fractions were able to 19
395
encapsulate starch granules and prevent the penetration of enzymes; thus, inhibiting
396
the release of glucose (Brahma et al., 2016; Brennan et al., 2012; Brennan et al.,
397
2013). In addition, the viscous nature of the fibres possibly inhibited the activity and
398
efficiency of the digestive enzymes (Aravind et al., 2012; Brennan et al., 2013). These
399
observations are supported by the negative correlations observed between AUC and
400
IDF (r=-0.799; p≤0.001), SDF (r=-0.452; p≤0,05) and TDF (r=-0.833; p≤0.001) in
401
Table 3. Table 3 also demonstrates a negative correlation between AUC value and
402
protein content (r=-0.6; p≤0.001). It is possible that hot extrusion produced a very
403
close protein network and enhanced the entrapment of starch granules; thus,
404
reducing the activity of digestive enzymes. Previously, researches have also shown
405
that the interactions of lipids with other components may result in decreasing
406
susceptibility to digestive enzymes (Holm et al., 1983). Table 3 illustrates a similar
407
observation in that a negative correlation was observed between the AUC for the
408
predictive glycaemic index and the fat content of all the samples (r=-0.855; p≤
409
0.001).
410
411
3.8 The relationship between antioxidant activity and the
412
glycaemic response
413
The results of the glycaemic response of all snack products in this study showed an
414
inverse relationship with their antioxidant capabilities (Figs. 1, 2b and Fig.
415
3-supplementary), Table 3 further illustrates strong negative correlations between
20
416
AUC and DPPH (r=-0.686; p≤0.001) and ORAC (r=-0.776; p≤0.001). To be specific,
417
the addition of mushroom powder increased the antioxidant properties of the final
418
products and limited the release of reducing sugars. This observation may be
419
ascribed to the ability of the mushroom enriched samples to decrease oxidative
420
stress. Moraes et al. (2015) showed that the glycaemic response may be negatively
421
correlated to the phenolic compounds and antioxidant capacities. This phenomenon
422
may due to the effect of the phenolic components on enzyme inhibition and starch
423
molecule interactions, that result in impaired starch digestibility and increased levels
424
of resistant starch (Mkandawire et al., 2013). The correlations illustrated in Table 3
425
advocate our understanding of such relationships to extruded snack products.
426
427
3.9. Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM)
428
The microstructure properties of control and mushroom enriched extrudates are
429
illustrated by SEM images presented in Fig. 4-supplementary. There was a more
430
continuous matrix of amorphous starch formation within the control sample
431
compared to mushroom enriched samples. The micrograph of mushroom enriched
432
samples indicate that gas cells were accumulated with the formation of large fissures
433
between cellular structures. Generally, Fig. 4-supplementary showed that individual
434
intact starch granules were not evident after suffering the hot extrusion. This agrees
435
with the DSC results, some starch molecules were not gelatinised in the 10 % and 15 %
436
shiitake mushroom extrudates (Table 2-supplementary). The image of 5 % white
21
437
button sample represented fibrous-lamellar structure, and 10 % white button and 5 %
438
shiitake mushroom samples obtained a rippled structure and the structural
439
orientation was random distributed with big fractures. This might play a role in their
440
higher crunchiness values than control. An ordered arrangement of cells and fibres
441
existed in the matrix of the 15 % white button mushroom extrudate, resulting in a
442
compacted and well-organized formation which in turn may have led to its highest
443
hardness value compared to other samples (Dar, Sharma, & Kumar, 2014).
444
445
4. Conclusion
446
Inclusion of mushroom powder into extruded snacks resulted in increased specific
447
length, water solubility index, energy value, fat and total phenolic content, while
448
decreased water absorption index, moisture and carbohydrate and total starch
449
content. Inclusion also reduced the degree of starch gelatinization and digestibility,
450
while improved the antioxidant activities of snack samples. All these changes were
451
correlated with the different inner structure alteration after the addition of
452
mushroom powder. In conclusion, hot extruded products incorporated with
453
mushroom powder could drastically provide more beneficial health influences.
454
455
Acknowledgements
456
This work was supported by Meadow Mushroom Ltd. in the supply of white button
22
457
mushroom material and the award of a student bursary to Xikun Lu.
458
459
Funding
460
This research received funding from the Ridett Institute, Palmerston North, New
461
Zealand, and the Tianjin Municipal Government, China, under a 1,000 expert
462
international talent project.
463
464
Declaration of interest
465
Declarations of interest: none.
466
467
Reference
468
AACC., 2010. Moisture - air ovens method (method 44-15.02). St. Paul, MN, USA: AACC
469
International.
470
Adebayo, E. A., Martínez‐Carrera, D. , Morales, P. , Sobal, M. , Escudero, H. , Meneses,
471
M. E., Avila‐Nava, A. , Castillo, I. and Bonilla, M. (2018), Comparative study
472
of antioxidant and antibacterial properties of the edible mushrooms Pleurotus
473
levis, P. ostreatus, P. pulmonarius and P. tuber‐regium. Int J Food Sci Technol,
474
53: 1316-1330. doi:10.1111/ijfs.13712Ai, Y., Cichy, K. A., Harte, J. B., Kelly,
475
J. D., & Ng, P. K. (2016). Effects of extrusion cooking on the chemical
476
composition and functional properties of dry common bean powders. Food Chemistry, 23
477
478
479
211, 538-545.
Anderson, R., Conway, H. F., & Peplinski, A. (1970). Gelatinization of corn grits by
roll cooking, extrusion cooking and steaming. Starch - Stärke, 22, 130-135.
480
Aravind, N., Sissons, M., Egan, N., & Fellows, C. (2012). Effect of insoluble dietary
481
fibre addition on technological, sensory, and structural properties of durum
482
wheat spaghetti. Food Chemistry, 130, 299-309.
483
Bach, F. , Helm, C. V., Bellettini, M. B., Maciel, G. M. & Haminiuk, C. W. (2017), Edible
484
mushrooms: a potential source of essential amino acids, glucans and minerals.
485
Int J Food Sci Technol, 52: 2382-2392. doi:10.1111/ijfs.13522
486
Brahma, S., Weier, S. A., & Rose, D. J. (2016). Effects of selected extrusion parameters
487
on physicochemical properties and in
488
extractability of whole grain oats. Journal of Cereal Science, 70, 85-90.
489
490
Breece, W. (1990). Nutritional
and
vitro starch digestibility and β-glucan
medicinal
value
of
specially
mushrooms.
Journal of Food Protection, 53, 883-894.
491
Brennan, M. A., Derbyshire, E., Tiwari, B. K., & Brennan, C. S. (2012). Enrichment of
492
extruded snack products with coproducts from chestnut mushroom (Agrocybe
493
aegerita) production: interactions between dietary fiber, physicochemical
494
characteristics, and glycemic load. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry,
495
60, 4396-4401.
496
Brennan, M. A., Derbyshire, E., Tiwari, B. K., & Brennan, C. S. (2013). Ready-to-eat
497
snack products: the role of extrusion technology in developing consumer
498
acceptable and nutritious snacks. International Journal of Food Science &
24
499
Technology, 48, 893-902.
500
Dar, A. H., Sharma, H. K., & Kumar, N. (2014). Effect of extrusion temperature on the
501
microstructure, textural and functional attributes of carrot pomace-cased
502
extrudates. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, 38, 212-222.
503
Englyst, H. N., Kingman, S. M., & Cummings, J. H. (1992). Classification and measurement
504
of nutritionally important starch fractions. European Journal of Clinical
505
Nutrition, 46, 33-50.
506
Floegel, A., Kim, D. O., Chung, S. J., Koo, S. I., & Chun, O. K. (2011). Comparison of
507
ABTS/DPPH assays to measure antioxidant capacity in popular antioxidant-rich
508
US foods. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 24, 1043-1048.
509
Foschia, M., Peressini, D., Sensidoni, A., Brennan, M. A., & Brennan, C. S. (2015).
510
Synergistic effect of different dietary fibres in pasta on in vitro starch
511
digestion? Food Chemistry, 172, 245-250.
512
513
514
Hagenimana, A., Ding, X., & Fang, T. (2006). Evaluation of rice flour modified by
extrusion cooking. Journal of Cereal Science, 43, 38-46.
Holm, J., Bjorck, I., Ostrowska, S., Eliasson, A. C., Asp, N. G., Larsson, K., & Lundquist,
515
I. (1983). Digestibility of amylose-lipid complexes in vitro and in vivo. Starch
516
- Stärke, 35, 294-297.
517
Jaworska, G., Pogon, K., Skrzypczak, A., & Bernas, E. (2015). Composition and antioxidant
518
properties of wild mushrooms Boletus edulis and Xerocomus badius prepared for
519
consumption. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 52, 7944-7953.
520
Karkle, E. L., Keller, L., Dogan, H., & Alavi, S. (2012). Matrix transformation in
25
521
fiber-added extruded products: Impact of different hydration regimens on texture,
522
microstructure and digestibility. Journal of Food Engineering, 108, 171-182.
523
Korkerd, S., Wanlapa, S., Puttanlek, C., Uttapap, D., & Rungsardthong, V. (2015).
524
Expansion and functional properties of extruded snacks enriched with nutrition
525
sources from food processing by-products. Journal of Food Science and Technology,
526
53, 561-570.
527
Jin, X. , Wang, Q. , Yang, X. , Guo, M. , Li, W. , Shi, J. , Adu‐Frimpong, M. , Xu,
528
X. , Deng, W. & Yu, J. (2018), Chemical characterisation and hypolipidaemic
529
effects of two purified Pleurotus eryngii polysaccharides. Int J Food Sci Technol,
530
53: 2298-2307. doi:10.1111/ijfs.13821
531
Lau, E., Goh, H. J., Quek, R., Lim, S. W., & Henry, J. (2016). Rapid estimation of the
532
energy content of composite foods: the application of the Calorie Answer. Asia
533
Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 25, 18-25.
534
Li, X. , Guo, Y. , Zhuang, Y. , Qin, Y. & Sun, L. (2018), Nonvolatile taste components,
535
nutritional values, bioactive compounds and antioxidant activities of three wild
536
Chanterelle
537
doi:10.1111/ijfs.13769
mushrooms.
Int
J
Food
Sci
Technol,
53:
1855-1864.
538
Lu, X.K., Brennan, M.A., Serventi, L., Liu, J.F., Guan, W.Q., & Brennan, C.S. (2018)
539
Addition of mushroom powder to pasta enhances the antioxidant content and
540
modulates the predictive glycaemic response of pasta. FOOD CHEMISTRY. 264:
541
199-209. DI 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.04.130
542
Lu, X., Brennan, M. A., Serventi, L., Mason, S., & Brennan, C. S. (2016). How the inclusion
26
543
of mushroom powder can affect the physicochemical characteristics of pasta.
544
International Journal of Food Science & Technology, 51, 2433-2439.
545
Mkandawire, N. L., Kaufman, R. C., Bean, S. R., Weller, C. L., Jackson, D. S., & Rose,
546
D. J. (2013). Effects of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) tannins on
547
alpha-amylase activity and in vitro digestibility of starch in raw and processed
548
flours. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 61, 4448-4454.
549
Moraes, É. A., Marineli, R. S., Lenquiste, S. A., Steel, C. J., Menezes, C. B., Queiroz,
550
V. A. V., & Júnior, M. R. M. (2015). Sorghum flour fractions: correlations among
551
polysaccharides, phenolic compounds, antioxidant activity and glycemic index.
552
Food Chemistry, 180, 116-123.
553
Olawuyi, I. F., & Lee, W. Y. (2019), Quality and antioxidant properties of functional rice
554
muffins enriched with shiitake mushroom and carrot pomace. Int J Food Sci
555
Technol, 54: 2321-2328. doi:10.1111/ijfs.14155
556
Pęksa, A., Kita, A., Carbonell-Barrachina, A. A., Miedzianka, J., Kolniak-Ostek, J.,
557
Tajner-Czopek, A., Rytel, E., Siwek, A., Miarka, D., & Drożdż, W. (2016). Sensory
558
attributes and physicochemical features of corn snacks as affected by different
559
flour types and extrusion conditions. LWT - Food Science and Technology, 72,
560
26-36.
561
Robin, F., Dubois, C., Pineau, N., Schuchmann, H. P., & Palzer, S. (2011). Expansion
562
mechanism of extruded foams supplemented with wheat bran. Journal of Food
563
Engineering, 107, 80-89.
564
Sanchez, J. E., Jimenez-Perez, G., & Liedo, P. (2015). Can consumption of antioxidant
27
565
rich mushrooms extend longevity?: antioxidant activity of Pleurotus spp. and
566
its effects on Mexican fruit flies' (Anastrepha ludens) longevity. Age (Dordr),
567
37, 107.
568
Singleton, V. L., & Rossi, J. A. (1965). Colorimetry of total phenolics with
569
phosphomolybdic-phosphotungstic acid reagents. American Journal of Enology and
570
Viticulture, 16, 144-158.
571
Tepsongkroh, B. , Jangchud, K. , Jangchud, A. , Chonpracha, P. , Ardoin, R. &
572
Prinyawiwatkul, W. (2019). Consumer perception of extruded snacks containing
573
brown rice and dried mushroom. Int J Food Sci Technol. doi:10.1111/ijfs.14220
574
Thaipong, K., Boonprakob, U., Crosby, K., Cisneros-Zevallos, L., & Hawkins Byrne, D.
575
(2006). Comparison of ABTS, DPPH, FRAP, and ORAC assays for estimating
576
antioxidant activity from guava fruit extracts. Journal of Food Composition and
577
Analysis, 19, 669-675.
578
Vallée, M., Lu, X., Narciso, J. O., Li, W., Qin, Y., Brennan, M. A., & Brennan, C. S.
579
(2017). Physical, predictive glycaemic response and antioxidative properties
580
of black ear mushroom (Auricularia auricula) extrudates. Plant Foods for Human
581
Nutrition, 72(3), 301-307. doi:10.1007/s11130-017-0621-6
582
Vital, A. C., Croge, C. , Gomes‐da‐Costa, S. M. & Matumoto‐Pintro, P. T. (2017), Effect
583
of addition of Agaricus blazei mushroom residue to milk enriched with Omega‐
584
3 on the prevention of lipid oxidation and bioavailability of bioactive compounds
585
after in vitro gastrointestinal digestion. Int J Food Sci Technol, 52: 1483-1490.
586
doi:10.1111/ijfs.13413
28
587
Wang, W. , Wu, Z. , Wang, X. , Li, C. , Zhang, K. , Zhou, J. , Cheng, S. & Lu, F. (2018),
588
Enzymatic hydrolysis combined with high‐pressure homogenisation for the
589
preparation of polysaccharide‐based nanoparticles from the by‐product of
590
Flammulina
591
doi:10.1111/ijfs.13836
velutipes.
Int
J
Food
Sci
Technol,
53:
2422-2429.
592
Wani, S. A., & Kumar, P. (2016). Effect of Extrusion on the nutritional, antioxidant
593
and microstructural characteristics of nutritionally enriched snacks. Journal
594
of Food Processing and Preservation, 40, 166-173.
595
Weigand-Heller, A. J., Kris-Etherton, P. M., & Beelman, R. B. (2012). The bioavailability
596
of ergothioneine from mushrooms (Agaricus bisporus) and the acute effects on
597
antioxidant capacity and biomarkers of inflammation. Preventive Medicine, 54,
598
S75-78.
599
Yu, L., Ramaswamy, H. S., & Boye, J. (2013). Protein rich extruded products prepared
600
from soy protein isolate-corn flour blends. LWT - Food Science and Technology,
601
50, 279-289.
602
29
Table 1. The processing parameters of hot extruded cooking Sample
Shaft speed (rpm) Feed rate Current Torque (g / min) (Amps) (Nm) CHE 200 20 5.53 56.5 5 % WBHE 200 25 5.77 60 10 % WBHE 200 25 5.98 64.5 15 % WBHE 200 25 5.95 61.7 5 % SHE 200 15 5.44 46 10 % SHE 200 15 4.92 42 15 % SHE 200 15 3.65 48.4 5 % PHE 200 25 6.04 70 10 % PHE 200 30 6.17 66.8 15 % PHE 200 30 6.22 62.8 Abbreviations: CHE=control hot extruded; WBHE=white button mushroom hot extruded; SHE=shiitake mushroom hot extruded; PHE=porcini mushroom hot extruded
Table 2. The nutrient components of hot extruded samples Sample
Energy kcal
Fat (g/100g DMB)
Carbohydrate (g/100g DMB)
Water (g/100g DMB)
CHE 5 % WBHE
355.33±1.53 e 357±0 e
0.37±0.058 e 1.1±0.1 d
78.73±0.50 a 78.2±0.36 a,b
7.13±0.25 b,c 7.13±0.15 b,c
Protein (g/100g DMB) 11.46±0.13 i 12.61±0.020
IDF (g/100g DMB) 2.44±0.19 d 3.00±0.097 c,d
SDF (g/100g DMB)
TDF (g/100g DMB)
2.65±0.045 a,b 2.27±0.30 b
5.09±0.15 e 5.27±0.21 e
2.49±0.18 b 2.24±0.10 b 2.42±0.44 b
6.94±0.34 c,d 7.47±0.15 b,c 5.96±0.60 d,e
e,f
360.67±0.58 c,d 364.67±0.58 a 359.67±0.58 d
10 % WBHE 15 % WBHE 5 % SHE
1.53±0.12 b,c 1.83±0.058 a,b 1.27±0.058 c,d
77.67±0.51 a,b,c 76.8±0.17 c 76.87±0.29 c
6.6±0.1 c,d 5.83±0.058 e 6.53±0.15 d
14.01±0.12 c 4.45±0.17 b,c 15.80±0.028 a 5.23±0.25 b 12.35±0.074 3.53±0.16 c,d e,f,g
10 % SHE 362±0 b,c 1.4±0.1 c,d 78.03±0.25 a,b 6.43±0.29 d 12.76±0.088 e 5.46±0.85 b 2.64±0.19 a,b 8.10±0.66 b,c 15 % SHE 363.33±0.58 a,b 2±0.1 a 78.13±0.47 a,b 6.6±0.1 c,d 12.52±0.11 e,f 8.00±0.21 a 2.94±0.25 a,b 10.93±0.46 a 5 % PHE 355.67±0.58 e 1.1±0.17 d 78.33±0.50 a,b 7.73±0.25 a 12.22±0.18 f,g 3.15±0.19 c,d 2.75±0.0032 a,b 5.90±0.20D e 10 % PHE 359.33±0.58 d 1.4±0.2 c,d 78.07±0.23 a,b 7.4±0.36 a,b 13.43±0.077 d 4.34±0.63 b,c 3.13±0.25 a,b 7.47±0.39B c 15 % PHE 361±0 c,d 1.6±0.1 b,c 77.6±0.26 b,c 7.17±0.12 a,b,c 14.58±0.22 b 5.23±0.49 b 3.62±0.44 a 8.85±0.057 b Mean ± standard deviation. Values within a vertical column followed by the same letter are not significantly different from each other (p < 0.05). Abbreviations: CHE=control hot extruded; WBHE=white button mushroom hot extruded; SHE=shiitake mushroom hot extruded; PHE=porcini mushroom hot extruded; IDF=insoluble dietary fibre; SDF=soluble dietary fibre; TDF=total dietary fibre.
Table 3. Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r) of physicochemical and nutritional properties of hot extruded products T
DPP
ORA
AUC
ST
EN
FT
PT
MS
DS
CRU
HAR
H
EXP
ER
Lsp
IDF
SDF
TDF
WAI
WSI
P C TPC
DPPH
ORAC
AUC
ST
EN
FT
PT
H
C
0.9 73* **
0.8 22* **
-0.6 71** *
-0.4 59*
0.41 7*
0.52 0**
0.76 3***
-0.2 8
0.8 36* **
-0.5 4**
0.54 8**
0.39 0*
-0.7 29** *
-0.7 12** *
0.13 9
0.34 4
0.6 26* **
0.46 6**
-0.7 53** *
0.06 9
0.8 82* **
-0.6 86** *
-0.4 59*
0.43 2*
0.58 1***
0.78 1***
-0.3 05
0.8 60* **
-0.5 06**
0.53 3**
0.31 3
-0.7 24** *
-0.7 08** *
0.15 8
0.36 9*
0.5 57* **
0.47 2**
-0.7 62** *
0.05 6
-0.7 76** *
-0.6 55** *
0.60 8***
0.78 4***
0.82 8***
-0.5 62** *
0.6 35* **
-0.1 3
0.15 6
0.30 1
-0.5 04**
-0.4 88**
0.27 2
0.53 1**
0.3 27
0.56 1***
-0.7 27** *
0.13 7
0.82 6***
-0.7 68** *
-0.8 55** *
-0.6 00** *
0.71 8***
-0. 336
-0.0 7
0.10 2
-0.5 57** *
0.59 3***
0.58 9***
-0.6 94** *
-0.7 99** *
-0. 452 *
-0.8 33** *
0.80 0***
-0.5 75** *
-0.9 06** *
-0.8 62** *
-0.5 72** *
0.91 0***
-0. 031
-0.3 61*
0.37 2*
-0.5 97** *
0.33 8
0.33
-0.7 21** *
-0.9 ***
-0. 223
-0.8 67** *
0.63 4***
-0.6 05** *
0.85 7***
0.66 9***
-0.8 91** *
0.0 32
0.26 2
-0.2 54
0.43 7*
-0.4 11*
-0.4 01*
0.72 4***
0.81 6***
0.0 25
0.74 2***
-0.5 39**
0.53 8**
0.63 3***
-0.8 10** *
0.1 83
0.27 8
-0.2 48
0.46 9**
-0.4 20*
-0.4 10*
0.66 0***
0.82 3***
0.1 52
0.78 ***
-0.6 15** *
0.50 3**
-0.5 13**
0.5 77* **
-0.3 08
0.34 1
0.11
-0.5 56** *
-0.5 34**
0.11 1
0.35
0.0 66
0.33 2
-0.4 69**
-0.0 93
MS
DS
CRU
HAR
H
EXP
ER
Lsp
IDF
0.1 36
-0.4 78**
0.46 6**
-0.5 24**
0.19 5
0.18 5
-0.7 54** *
-0.8 71** *
-0. 042
-0.7 96** *
0.52 3**
-0.6 00** *
-0.7 52** *
0.78 7***
0.03 5
-0.6 69** *
0.65 8***
-0.1 97
-0.0 49
0.4 84* *
0.07 7
-0.5 21**
-0.2 74
-0.9 73** *
0.24 9
0.62 0***
0.61 3***
0.39 9*
0.41 4*
-0. 318
0.29 4
0.09 5
0.47 4**
-0.2 3
-0.5 94** *
-0.5 83** *
-0.4 28*
-0.4 18*
0.2 71
-0.3 1
-0.1 04
-0.5 07**
-0.2 87
-0.2 85
0.64 9***
0.73 9***
0.5 50* *
0.80 3***
-0.7 00** *
0.64 8***
0.99 9***
-0.3 37
-0.3 78*
-0. 468 **
-0.4 58*
0.55 9***
-0.1 16
-0.3 42
-0.3 76*
-0. 472 **
-0.4 57*
0.55 3**
-0.1 23
0.88 8***
0.2 29
0.85 8***
-0.5 86** *
0.88 2***
0.2 78
0.97 1***
-0.6 94**
0.74 7***
* SDF
0.5* *
TDF
WAI
-0.6 54** *
0.34 5
-0.7 88** *
0.75 9***
-0.5 13**
TPC, mg GAE/g DM; DPPH, μM TE/g DM; ORAC, μM TE/g DM; AUC, In vitro area under the curve value; ST, Starch %; EN, Energy (kcal); FT, Fat %; PT, Protein %; MS, Moisture %; DS, Density g/L; CRU, Cruchiness/Number of peaks; HAR, Peak force/Hardness of product; H, △H J/g; EXP, Expansion; ER, Radial expansion ratio; Lsp, Specific length; IDF, Insoluble dietary fibre %; SDF, Soluble dietary fibre %; TDF, Total dietary fibre %; WAI, Water absorption index; WSI, Water solubility index. *, significant at p ≤ 0.05. **, significant at p ≤ 0.01. ***, significant at p ≤ 0.001.
Table 4. Physical and textural properties of extruded snack products Sample
% Expansion
ER
Lsp (mm/g)
CHE 5 % WBHE 10 % WBHE 15 % WBHE 5 % SHE 10 % SHE
394.9 ± 31.02 b,c,d 446.68±32.46 a 406.52±23.33 b,c 346.18±16.23 g 400.45±26.46 b,c,d 420.07±25.14 b
15.69±2.51 b,c,d 20.05±2.98 a 16.58±1.91 b,c 12.01±1.12 g 16.1±2.13 b,c,d 17.71±2.14 b
45.36±2.50 e 44.01±3.85 e 45.04±2.94 e 52.43±3.01 b,c 51±4.60 b,c,d 54.18±7.30 b
Product Density (g/l) 138.83±5.13 c,d 139.37±3.51 c,d 148.31±4.28 c 162.95±2.26 b 138.68±1.85 c,d 131.28±4.68 d
WAI (g/100g) 6.55 ± 0.41 a 6.31 ± 0.098 a,b 6.027 ± 0.22 a,b,c 5.71 ± 0.092 b,c,d 6.27 ± 0.18 a,b 5.61 ± 0.18 c,d
WSI (g/100g) 11.063 ± 1.029 e 11.21 ± 1.35 e 11.32 ± 0.37 e 12.018 ± 0.018 c,d,e 14.72 ± 1.16 b,c 17.49 ± 0.79 a,b
Moisture content (g/100g) 8.24±0.05 a 7.80±0.20 c,d 7.46±0.08 d,e,f 7.18±0.22 f,g 7.86±0.12 b,c 7.20±0.03 e,f,g
15 % SHE 375.45±19.62 d,e,f 14.13±1.48 d,e,f 60.97±4.85 a 135.01±2.45 d 5.31 ± 0.096 d,e 18.89 ± 0.59 a 6.96±0.18 g 5 % PHE 388.73±22.87 c,d,e 15.16±1.82 c,d,e 47.55±2.66 d,e 165.17±7.04 b 5.80 ± 0.051 b,c,d 11.48 ± 1.37 d,e 8.18±0.10 a,b 10 % PHE 366.3±25.28 e,f,g 13.48±1.81 e,f,g 50.27±3.08 c,d,e 167.41±1.61 a,b 5.42 ± 0.22 c,d,e 14.28 ± 1.08 c,d 7.74±0.03 c,d 15 % PHE 359.18±22.08 f,g 12.95±1.65 f,g 49.69±4.44 c,d 177.66±6.36 a 4.97 ± 0.28 e 14.40 ± 0.34 c 7.55±0.03 c,d,e Mean ± standard deviation. Values within a vertical column followed by the same letter are not significantly different from each other (p < 0.05). Abbreviations: CHE=control hot extruded; WBHE=white button mushroom hot extruded; SHE=shiitake mushroom hot extruded; PHE=porcini mushroom hot extruded.
(a) 8 a
7
mg GAE/ g DM
6 5
b
b
4 c
3
c
c
d e
2
e
f 1 0 CHE
5 % WBHE
10 % WBHE
15 % WBHE
5 % SHE 10 % SHE 15 % SHE 5 % PHE 10 % PHE 15 % PHE
(b) 4.5 a
4
µmol TE/g DM
3.5 b
b 3 2.5 2
c
cd
d
1.5
e
ef
1
f
0.5 g 0 CHE
5% WBHE
10 % WBHE
15 % 5 % SHE WBHE
10 % SHE
15 % SHE
5 % PHE
10 % PHE
15 % PHE
(c) 12
a a
10
µmol TE/g DM
b
b c
8
c
cd 6
d
4
e
2 f 0 CHE
5% WBHE
10 % WBHE
15 % WBHE
5 % SHE 10 % SHE 15 % SHE 5 % PHE 10 % PHE 15 % PHE
Fig. 1. Values for total phenolic component (TPC) (a); antioxidant capacities: the DPPH. scavenging activities (b); and the ORAC assay results (c). Comparing the control (CHE) to all mushroom powder enriched hot extruded samples: white button mushroom hot extruded products (WBHE); shiitake mushroom hot extruded products (SHE) and porcini mushroom hot extruded products (PHE). Error bars represent standard deviation of replicates. The same letter is not significantly different from each other (p < 0.05).
(a) 80 75
a
a
Starch % Dry Basis
b
bc
70
cd de
65
e
e
de f
60 55 50 45 40 CHE
5% WBHE
10 % WBHE
15 % WBHE
5 % SHE 10 % SHE 15 % SHE 5 % PHE 10 % PHE 15 % PHE
(b) 1100 a 1000
ab cd cd
AUC
900
bc
cde
de
cde e
e
800 700 600 500 400 CHE
5% 10 % 15 % 5 % SHE 10 % WBHE WBHE WBHE SHE
15 % SHE
5% PHE
10 % PHE
15 % PHE
Fig. 2. The total starch content (a) and values for area under the curve (AUC) (b). Comparing the control (CHE) to all mushroom powder enriched hot extruded samples: white button mushroom hot extruded products (WBHE); shiitake mushroom hot extruded products (SHE) and porcini mushroom hot extruded products (PHE). Error bars represent standard deviation of replicates. The same letter is not significantly different from each other (p < 0.05).
1. Incorporation of mushroom altered the physical and textural properties of hot extruded products. 2. Incorporation of mushroom increased the insoluble and total dietary fibre contents of final samples, whereas reduced the starch content of final products gradually. 3. Addition of mushroom limited the starch gelatinisation and digestibility of hot extruded products. 4. Addition of mushroom enhanced the antioxidant abilities of hot extruded snacks.
AUTHOR DECLARATION TEMPLATE
We wish to confirm that there are no known conflicts of interest associated with this publication and there has been no significant financial support for this work that could have influenced its outcome.
We confirm that the manuscript has been read and approved by all named authors and that there are no other persons who satisfied the criteria for authorship but are not listed. We further confirm that the order of authors listed in the manuscript has been approved by all of us.
We confirm that we have given due consideration to the protection of intellectual property associated with this work and that there are no impediments to publication, including the timing of publication, with respect to intellectual property. In so doing we confirm that we have followed the regulations of our institutions concerning intellectual property.
We understand that the Corresponding Author is the sole contact for the Editorial process (including Editorial Manager and direct communications with the office). He/she is responsible for communicating with the other authors about progress, submissions of revisions and final approval of proofs.
Professor Charles Brennan 08/07/2019