- Email: [email protected]
Corrigendum to “Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol-induced conditioned place preference and intracerebroventricular self-administration in rats” [Eur. J. Pharmacol. 506 (2005) 63–69]
European Journal of Pharmacology 511 (2005) 75 – 76 www.elsevier.com/locate/ejphar
Corrigendum
Corrigendum to bD9-Tetrahydrocannabinol-induced conditioned place preference and intracerebroventricular self-administration in ratsQ [Eur. J. Pharmacol. 506 (2005) 63–69] Daniela Braida, Stefania Iosue`, Simona Pegorini, Mariaelvina SalaT Department of Pharmacology, Chemotherapy and Medical Toxicology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Milan, Via Vanvitelli 32, 20129 Milan, Italy
The author realized that the scale of Figs. 1 and 2 were wrong in the abovementioned article. The legend, the text and everything within the article are correct. The correct Figs. 1 and 2 are herewith given.
DOI of original article: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2004.10.044. T Corresponding author. Tel.: +39 2 50317042; fax: +39 2 50317036. E-mail address: [email protected] (M. Sala). 0014-2999/$ - see front matter D 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.ejphar.2005.01.035
76
Corrigendum
Fig. 1. Effect of increasing i.p. doses of D9-THC on conditioned place preference evaluated as the time (meanFS.E.M.) spent in the drug-paired compartment before and after conditioning on the test day, during which neither drug nor vehicle was injected. N=8 rats for each group. VEH— vehicle. *Pb0.05, **Pb0.01, and ***Pb0.001 as compared with vehicle group during postconditioning; yyPb0.01 and yyyPb0.001 as compared with corresponding postconditioning (Tukey’s test).
Fig. 2. Effect of increasing i.p. doses of SR 141716 (SR) (top) or naloxone (NX) (bottom) on D9-THC-induced (0.75 mg/kg i.p.) conditioned place preference. Data were evaluated as time (meanFS.E.M.) spent in the drugpaired compartment before and after conditioning on the test day, during which neither drug nor vehicle was injected. Doses are expressed as mg/kg i.p. N=8 rats for each group. VEH—vehicle. ***Pb0.001 as compared with corresponding preconditioning; yPb0.05, yyPb0.01, and yyy Pb0.001 as compared with VEH+D9-THC postconditioning; ###Pb0.001 as compared with VEH group during postconditioning (Tukey’s test).
Corrigendum
Corrigendum to bD9-Tetrahydrocannabinol-induced conditioned place preference and intracerebroventricular self-administration in ratsQ [Eur. J. Pharmacol. 506 (2005) 63–69] Daniela Braida, Stefania Iosue`, Simona Pegorini, Mariaelvina SalaT Department of Pharmacology, Chemotherapy and Medical Toxicology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Milan, Via Vanvitelli 32, 20129 Milan, Italy
The author realized that the scale of Figs. 1 and 2 were wrong in the abovementioned article. The legend, the text and everything within the article are correct. The correct Figs. 1 and 2 are herewith given.
DOI of original article: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2004.10.044. T Corresponding author. Tel.: +39 2 50317042; fax: +39 2 50317036. E-mail address: [email protected] (M. Sala). 0014-2999/$ - see front matter D 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.ejphar.2005.01.035
76
Corrigendum
Fig. 1. Effect of increasing i.p. doses of D9-THC on conditioned place preference evaluated as the time (meanFS.E.M.) spent in the drug-paired compartment before and after conditioning on the test day, during which neither drug nor vehicle was injected. N=8 rats for each group. VEH— vehicle. *Pb0.05, **Pb0.01, and ***Pb0.001 as compared with vehicle group during postconditioning; yyPb0.01 and yyyPb0.001 as compared with corresponding postconditioning (Tukey’s test).
Fig. 2. Effect of increasing i.p. doses of SR 141716 (SR) (top) or naloxone (NX) (bottom) on D9-THC-induced (0.75 mg/kg i.p.) conditioned place preference. Data were evaluated as time (meanFS.E.M.) spent in the drugpaired compartment before and after conditioning on the test day, during which neither drug nor vehicle was injected. Doses are expressed as mg/kg i.p. N=8 rats for each group. VEH—vehicle. ***Pb0.001 as compared with corresponding preconditioning; yPb0.05, yyPb0.01, and yyy Pb0.001 as compared with VEH+D9-THC postconditioning; ###Pb0.001 as compared with VEH group during postconditioning (Tukey’s test).