Animal Behaviour 124 (2017) 25
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Animal Behaviour journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/anbehav
Corrigendum
Corrigendum to “A multifactorial investigation of captive chimpanzees' intraspecific gestural laterality” [Animal Behaviour 116 (2016) 31e43] phanie Barbu a, Catherine Blois-Heulin a Jacques Prieur a, *, Simone Pika b, Ste a b
Ethos ‘Ethologie Animale et Humaine’, Universit e de Rennes 1, CNRS UMR 6552, Station biologique de Paimpont, France Max Planck Institute for Ornithology, Humboldt Research Group ‘Evolution of Communication’, Seewiesen, Germany
In Table 2 of our article, the t values of the column ‘t test’ were not correctly reported. We sincerely regret this error. A corrected Table 2 is provided below. Table 2 Characteristics, descriptive statistics and analyses of each gesture Gesture
Sensory Communication Duration Sharing modality tool degree
Clap hand Slap hand Slap foot Touch genital Hand on Embrace lateral Embrace ventral/dorsal Touch body Embrace half Push Embrace Kick Punch Hit with object Attempt to reach Drag object Put object on head/back Shake object Extend hand Throw object Raise arm
Auditory Auditory Auditory Tactile Tactile Tactile Tactile Tactile Tactile Tactile Tactile Tactile Tactile Tactile Visual Visual Visual Visual Visual Visual Visual
e e e e e e e e e e e e e Yes e Yes Yes Yes e Yes e
Short Short Short Long Long Long Long Long Long Short Long Short Short Short Short Long Short Short Long Short Short
Rare Common Common Common Common Common Rare Common Rare Common Common Rare Common Rare Common Rare Rare Common Common Rare Common
N
Data points NL. B test LH RH B test Mean analysed L vs NL LH vs RH HI
8 33 21 29 30 29 13 39 12 24 31 8 34 12 31 13 11 38 37 12 25
177 2850 1412 692 581 1339 686 4203 623 464 771 95 1654 248 831 488 386 5095 1226 347 856
1 16 10 25 23 25 10 35 11 20 28 8 18 7 23 11 6 18 21 5 11
0.070 1 1 0.0001 0.005 0.0001 0.092 0 0.006 0.002 0 0.008 0.864 0.774 0.011 0.023 1 0.871 0.511 0.774 0.690
4 0 0 2 5 2 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0
3 17 11 2 2 2 2 3 1 4 2 0 16 5 7 2 5 19 16 6 14
1 0 0.001 0.453 0 0.070 0 0 0.125 0.0001
0.151 0.391 0.468 0.079 0.052 0.016 0.056 0.060 0.064 0.101 0.188 0.291 0.317 0.466 0.202 0.257 0.302 0.314 0.381 0.411 0.471
Shapiro t test/Wilcoxon test Mean test ABSHI 0.009 0.867 0.012 0.299 0.474 0.044 0.925 0.011 0.353 0.618 0.759 0.558 0.858 0.745 0.973 0.845 0.591 0.340 0.860 0.056 0.017
W¼16.5, P¼0.889 t¼8.733, P<0.0001 W¼223.5, P¼0.0002 t¼1.209, P¼0.237 t¼0.728, P¼0.472 W¼219, P¼0.478 t¼0.723, P¼0.107 W¼456.5, P¼0.215 t¼1.177, P¼0.264 t¼1.650, P¼0.113 t¼3.714, P¼0.0008 t¼3.612, P¼0.009 t¼7.016, P<0.0001 t¼4.962, P¼0.0004 t¼3.180, P¼0.003 t¼4.709, P¼0.0005 t¼2.662, P¼0.024 t¼7.684, P<0.0001 t¼8.727, P<0.0001 t¼2.687, P¼0.021 W¼311, P<0.0001
0.836 0.400 0.513 0.261 0.281 0.236 0.224 0.149 0.154 0.260 0.276 0.291 0.348 0.491 0.325 0.282 0.398 0.352 0.394 0.598 0.543
Gestures are grouped by sensory modality and classified by increasing HI values. N: number of subjects that performed each gesture at least six times. Data points analysed: number of data points associated with the N analysed subjects; NL: numbers of nonlateralized subjects; B test L vs NL: P value of the binomial test on the numbers of lateralized versus nonlateralized subjects; LH: number of left-handed subjects; RH: number of right-handed subjects; B test LH vs RH: P value of the binomial test on the numbers of lefthanded versus right-handed subjects; -: insufficient number of lateralized subjects for testing; mean HI: mean handedness index score of N analysed subjects, the sign indicates the direction of the gestural bias (negative value: left-hand bias; positive value: right-hand bias); t test: t and P values of the t test only performed for normally distributed HI values of N analysed subjects; Wilcoxon test: W and P values of the Wilcoxon test only performed when normality of HI values is not verified; mean ABSHI: mean absolute value of handedness index score of N analysed subjects. Significant results are in bold.
DOI of original article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.03.024. de * Correspondence: J. Prieur, Ethos ‘Ethologie Animale et Humaine’, Universite Rennes 1, CNRS UMR 6552, Station biologique de Paimpont, France. E-mail address:
[email protected] (J. Prieur). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.11.027 0003-3472