- Email: [email protected]
Corrigendum to “An electrocorticographic electrode array for simultaneous recording from medial, lateral, and intrasulcal surface of the cortex in macaque monkeys” [J. Neurosci. Methods 233 (2014) 155–165]
Journal of Neuroscience Methods 245 (2015) 205–206
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Journal of Neuroscience Methods journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jneumeth
Corrigendum
Corrigendum to “An electrocorticographic electrode array for simultaneous recording from medial, lateral, and intrasulcal surface of the cortex in macaque monkeys” [J. Neurosci. Methods 233 (2014) 155–165] Makoto Fukushima a,∗ , Richard C. Saunders a , Matthew Mullarkey a , Alexandra M. Doyle a , Mortimer Mishkin a , Naotaka Fujii b a b
Laboratory of Neuropsychology, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, 49 Convent Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA Laboratory for Adaptive Intelligence Brain Science Institute, RIKEN, 2-1 Hirosawa, Wako, Saitama 351-0198, Japan
The authors regret that there is an error in their paper. Throughout the paper, the distance between two electrode sites in a bipolar pair is described as 1.8 mm but was actually 1.4 mm. The following statements in the article contain this incorrect inter-electrode distance value: 1. p. 156, the 2nd column, line 19: “the distance between two sites in a bipolar pair was 1.8 mm (Fig. 2a).” This needs to be corrected to: “the distance between two sites in a bipolar pair was 1.4 mm (Fig. 2a).” 2. p. 164, 1st column, line 4: “The ECoG array in the current study had a bipolar inter-electrode distance of 1.8 mm (Fig. 2a).” This needs to be corrected to: “The ECoG array in the current study had a bipolar inter-electrode distance of 1.4 mm (Fig. 2a).” 3. Fig. 2a: The corrected Fig. 2a is attached below. The figure legend for Fig. 2a needs to be corrected accordingly as follows: “the distance between the electrodes in the pair was 1.8 mm”. This needs to be corrected to: “the distance between the electrodes in the pair was 1.4 mm”.
DOI of original article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2014.06.022. ∗ Corresponding author at: Laboratory of Neuropsychology, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Building 49, Room 1B80, 49 Convent Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. Tel.: +1 301 443 7458; fax: +1 301 402 0046. E-mail address: makoto [email protected] (M. Fukushima). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2015.01.007 0165-0270/Published by Elsevier B.V.
206
M. Fukushima et al. / Journal of Neuroscience Methods 245 (2015) 205–206
Fig. 2a.
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Journal of Neuroscience Methods journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jneumeth
Corrigendum
Corrigendum to “An electrocorticographic electrode array for simultaneous recording from medial, lateral, and intrasulcal surface of the cortex in macaque monkeys” [J. Neurosci. Methods 233 (2014) 155–165] Makoto Fukushima a,∗ , Richard C. Saunders a , Matthew Mullarkey a , Alexandra M. Doyle a , Mortimer Mishkin a , Naotaka Fujii b a b
Laboratory of Neuropsychology, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, 49 Convent Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA Laboratory for Adaptive Intelligence Brain Science Institute, RIKEN, 2-1 Hirosawa, Wako, Saitama 351-0198, Japan
The authors regret that there is an error in their paper. Throughout the paper, the distance between two electrode sites in a bipolar pair is described as 1.8 mm but was actually 1.4 mm. The following statements in the article contain this incorrect inter-electrode distance value: 1. p. 156, the 2nd column, line 19: “the distance between two sites in a bipolar pair was 1.8 mm (Fig. 2a).” This needs to be corrected to: “the distance between two sites in a bipolar pair was 1.4 mm (Fig. 2a).” 2. p. 164, 1st column, line 4: “The ECoG array in the current study had a bipolar inter-electrode distance of 1.8 mm (Fig. 2a).” This needs to be corrected to: “The ECoG array in the current study had a bipolar inter-electrode distance of 1.4 mm (Fig. 2a).” 3. Fig. 2a: The corrected Fig. 2a is attached below. The figure legend for Fig. 2a needs to be corrected accordingly as follows: “the distance between the electrodes in the pair was 1.8 mm”. This needs to be corrected to: “the distance between the electrodes in the pair was 1.4 mm”.
DOI of original article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2014.06.022. ∗ Corresponding author at: Laboratory of Neuropsychology, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Building 49, Room 1B80, 49 Convent Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. Tel.: +1 301 443 7458; fax: +1 301 402 0046. E-mail address: makoto [email protected] (M. Fukushima). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2015.01.007 0165-0270/Published by Elsevier B.V.
206
M. Fukushima et al. / Journal of Neuroscience Methods 245 (2015) 205–206
Fig. 2a.