- Email: [email protected]
Corrigendum to “Conjugate natural convection heat transfer in a partitioned differentially-heated square cavity” [Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transfer 81 (2017) 92–103]
International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer 82 (2017) 161
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ichmt
Corrigendum to “Conjugate natural convection heat transfer in a partitioned differentially-heated square cavity” [Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transfer 81 (2017) 92–103] Mehdi Khatamifar a, Wenxian Lin a,b,⁎, S.W. Armfield c, David Holmes a, M.P. Kirkpatrick c a b c
College of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD 4811, Australia Solar Energy Research Institute, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming, Yunnan 650092, PR China School of Aerospace, Mechanical and Mechatronic Engineering, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
The authors regret that the following error was made in the original article. In the original article it was stated that the conductivity ratio kr = 622 (Line 5 of the last paragraph in the right column on page 94 and Line 4 of the second paragraph in the right column on page 102). Correspondingly it was stated that rk = 0.0016, where rk is the inverse of kr (Line 4 of the second paragraph in the right column on page 102). Owing to a coding error the results presented in the paper are
DOI of original article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2016.12.003. ⁎ Corresponding author at: College of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD 4811, Australia. E-mail address: [email protected] (W. Lin).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2017.02.018 0735-1933/© 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
for kr = 1.0 (and correspondingly for rk = 1.0), rather than for kr = 622. Hence, “kr = 622” in Line 5 of the last paragraph in the right column on page 94 and in Line 4 of the second paragraph in the right column on page 102 must be replaced by “kr = 1.0”, and correspondingly “rk = 0.0016” in Line 4 of the second paragraph in the right column on page 102 must be replaced by “rk = 1.0”. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ichmt
Corrigendum to “Conjugate natural convection heat transfer in a partitioned differentially-heated square cavity” [Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transfer 81 (2017) 92–103] Mehdi Khatamifar a, Wenxian Lin a,b,⁎, S.W. Armfield c, David Holmes a, M.P. Kirkpatrick c a b c
College of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD 4811, Australia Solar Energy Research Institute, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming, Yunnan 650092, PR China School of Aerospace, Mechanical and Mechatronic Engineering, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
The authors regret that the following error was made in the original article. In the original article it was stated that the conductivity ratio kr = 622 (Line 5 of the last paragraph in the right column on page 94 and Line 4 of the second paragraph in the right column on page 102). Correspondingly it was stated that rk = 0.0016, where rk is the inverse of kr (Line 4 of the second paragraph in the right column on page 102). Owing to a coding error the results presented in the paper are
DOI of original article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2016.12.003. ⁎ Corresponding author at: College of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD 4811, Australia. E-mail address: [email protected] (W. Lin).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2017.02.018 0735-1933/© 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
for kr = 1.0 (and correspondingly for rk = 1.0), rather than for kr = 622. Hence, “kr = 622” in Line 5 of the last paragraph in the right column on page 94 and in Line 4 of the second paragraph in the right column on page 102 must be replaced by “kr = 1.0”, and correspondingly “rk = 0.0016” in Line 4 of the second paragraph in the right column on page 102 must be replaced by “rk = 1.0”. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.