Corrigendum to “Dimensional optimization of a micro-channel heat sink using Jaya algorithm” [Appl. Therm. Eng. 103 (2016) 572–582]

Corrigendum to “Dimensional optimization of a micro-channel heat sink using Jaya algorithm” [Appl. Therm. Eng. 103 (2016) 572–582]

Applied Thermal Engineering xxx (2017) xxx–xxx Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Applied Thermal Engineering journal homepage: www.elsevier...

172KB Sizes 1 Downloads 36 Views

Applied Thermal Engineering xxx (2017) xxx–xxx

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Applied Thermal Engineering journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/apthermeng

Corrigendum to ‘‘Dimensional optimization of a micro-channel heat sink using Jaya algorithm” [Appl. Therm. Eng. 103 (2016) 572–582] R.V. Rao a,⇑, K.C. More a, J. Taler b, P. Oclon b a b

Dept. of Mech. Engg., S.V. National Institute of Technology, Surat 395007, India ´ Energetycznych, Al. Jana Pawła II 37, 31-864 Kraków, Poland Politechnika Krakowska, Instytut Maszyn i Urza˛dzen

Tables A2 to A5 present in the appendix are to be replaced with the following new Tables A2–A5, respectively. The words ‘‘Sphere function” should be read as ‘‘Rastrigin function”. The other textual matter of the appendix remains the same. Table A2 New values of the variables and the objective function during first iteration. Candidate

x1

1 2 3 4 5

1.142015595 5.120000000 0.149454700 0.857586897 0.982105144

x2

f(x)

2.856830388 1.843392885 0.350414953 3.979664354 0.974135756

16.969992379 36.785779377 20.138516097 20.398015197 2.108371361

Table A3 Updated values of the variables and the objective function based on fitness comparison at the end of first iteration. Candidate

x1

1 2 3 4 5

1.142015595 5.120000000 0.149454700 1.062187325 0.982105144

x2

f(x)

2.856830388 1.843392885 0.350414953 0.767182961 0.974135756

Status

16.969992379 36.785779377 20.138516097 11.392974841 2.108371361

Worst

Best

Table A4 New values of the variables and the objective function during second iteration. Candidate

x1

x2

f(x)

1 2 3 4 5

2.160893801 2.430368343 0.452547931 2.047537658 0.030389327

1.915483654 1.033793026 0.265097775 0.097490392 0.277539324

14.404923038 26.258088666 30.781090749 6.462836410 11.981417146

Table A5 Updated values of the variables and the objective function based on fitness comparison at the end of second iteration. Candidate

x1

1 2 3 4 5

2.160893801 2.430368343 0.149454700 2.047537658 0.982105144

x2 1.915483654 1.033793026 0.350414953 0.097490392 0.974135756

f(x) 14.404923038 26.258088666 20.138516097 6.462836410 2.108371361

Status Worst

Best

DOI of original article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.04.135

⇑ Corresponding author.

E-mail address: [email protected] (R.V. Rao). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.05.037 1359-4311/

Please cite this article in press as: R.V. Rao et al., Corrigendum to ‘‘Dimensional optimization of a micro-channel heat sink using Jaya algorithm” [Appl. Therm. Eng. 103 (2016) 572–582], Appl. Therm. Eng. (2017), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.05.037