Journal of Ethnopharmacology xxx (xxxx) xxx–xxx
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Journal of Ethnopharmacology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jep
Corrigendum
Corrigendum to “In vitro and in vivo assessment of the genotoxicity and antigenotoxicity of the Filipendula hexapetala and Filipendula ulmaria methanol extracts” [J. Ethnopharmacol. 174 (2015) 287–292] ⁎
Sanja Matića, , Jelena Katanićb, Snežana Stanića, Milan Mladenovićb, Nevena Stankovićb, Vladimir Mihailovićb, Tatjana Borojab a b
Department of Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Science, University of Kragujevac, Radoja Domanovića 12, 34000 Kragujevac, Serbia Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Kragujevac, Radoja Domanovića 12, 34000 Kragujevac, Serbia
During the assembly of Fig. 2A and B, an incorrect gel image in Fig. 2A was inadvertently included. It should be replaced with the correct one as below. This error does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in
any way since results of relative density data in the graphs were presented with originally obtained values. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.
Fig. 2. DNA protection activity of (A) Filipendula hexapetala and (B) Filipendula ulmaria methanol extracts from roots and aerial parts on hydroxyl radical-induced DNA damage. Lane 1, DNA control; Lane 2, DNA damage control; Lane 3, gallic acid; Lanes 4-6, F. hexapetala or F. ulmaria extracts from roots (100, 200, and 400 μg/ml) respectively; Lanes 7-9, F. hexapetala or F. ulmaria extracts from aerial parts (100, 200, and 400 μg/ml) respectively.
DOI of original article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2015.08.025 ⁎ Corresponding author. E-mail address:
[email protected] (S. Matić). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2017.02.030
0378-8741/ © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Please cite this article as: Matic, S., Journal of Ethnopharmacology (2017), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2017.02.030