- Email: [email protected]
j.Diagmicrobio.2016.01.004. Epub 2016 Jan 9]
Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease xxx (2017) xxx–xxx
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/diagmicrobio
Corrigendum to “Malaria surveillance in the Democratic Republic of the Congo: Comparison of microscopy, PCR, and rapid diagnostic test” [Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2016 May;85(1):16–8. doi: 10.1016/ j.Diagmicrobio.2016.01.004. Epub 2016 Jan 9] Stephanie M. Doctor a,⁎, Yunhao Liu a,b, Amy Whitesell a, Kyaw L. Thwai a, Steve M. Taylor c, Mark Janko d,e, Michael Emch d,e, Melchior Kashamuka f, Jérémie Muwonga g, Antoinette Tshefu f, Steven R. Meshnick a a
Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA Department of Statistics and Operations Research, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA Division of Infectious Diseases and International Health, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27708, USA d Department of Geography, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA e Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA f Ecole de Santé Publique, Faculté de Medecine, Université de Kinshasa, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo g Programme National de Lutte contre le SIDA et les IST, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo b c
The pfldh R primer shown in Table S1 is different than the pfldh R primer previously published (Taylor et al. 2010). The sensitivity of the pfldh PCR assay using the primer described in this paper is 100 parasites per microliter, not 10–50 parasites per microliter as stated in the paper.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2017.08.006 0732-8893/
Please cite this article as: Doctor SM, et al, Corrigendum to “Malaria surveillance in the Democratic Republic of the Congo: Comparison of microscopy, PCR, and rapid diagnostic ..., Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis (2017), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2017.08.006
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/diagmicrobio
Corrigendum to “Malaria surveillance in the Democratic Republic of the Congo: Comparison of microscopy, PCR, and rapid diagnostic test” [Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2016 May;85(1):16–8. doi: 10.1016/ j.Diagmicrobio.2016.01.004. Epub 2016 Jan 9] Stephanie M. Doctor a,⁎, Yunhao Liu a,b, Amy Whitesell a, Kyaw L. Thwai a, Steve M. Taylor c, Mark Janko d,e, Michael Emch d,e, Melchior Kashamuka f, Jérémie Muwonga g, Antoinette Tshefu f, Steven R. Meshnick a a
Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA Department of Statistics and Operations Research, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA Division of Infectious Diseases and International Health, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27708, USA d Department of Geography, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA e Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA f Ecole de Santé Publique, Faculté de Medecine, Université de Kinshasa, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo g Programme National de Lutte contre le SIDA et les IST, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo b c
The pfldh R primer shown in Table S1 is different than the pfldh R primer previously published (Taylor et al. 2010). The sensitivity of the pfldh PCR assay using the primer described in this paper is 100 parasites per microliter, not 10–50 parasites per microliter as stated in the paper.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2017.08.006 0732-8893/
Please cite this article as: Doctor SM, et al, Corrigendum to “Malaria surveillance in the Democratic Republic of the Congo: Comparison of microscopy, PCR, and rapid diagnostic ..., Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis (2017), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2017.08.006