- Email: [email protected]
Corrigendum to “Missing carbon reductions? Exploring rebound and backfire effects in UK households” [Energy Policy 39 (2011) 3572–3581]
Energy Policy 49 (2012) 778
Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect
Energy Policy journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol
Corrigendum
Corrigendum to ‘‘Missing carbon reductions? Exploring rebound and backfire effects in UK households’’ [Energy Policy 39 (2011) 3572–3581] Angela Druckman a,n, Mona Chitnis a, Steve Sorrell b, Tim Jackson a a b
ESRC Research Group on Lifestyles, Values and Environment (RESOLVE), University of Surrey, UK Sussex Energy Group, University of Sussex, UK
GHG emissions (tCO2e)
An incorrect graph was produced in Fig. 1b and the correct graph is shown below. The second sentence in Section 4.1 should read as: Fig. 1a–c illustrates that whereas, for example, gas accounts for only around 1% of total expenditure, it is one of the categories with the highest GHG emissions. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience this may have caused to the readers of the journal.
5.0 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0
Fig. 1. (b) Average annual UK household GHG emissions (2008).
n
DOI of original article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.03.058 Corresponding author. Tel.: þ44 1483 686679; fax: þ44 1483 686671. E-mail address: [email protected] (A. Druckman).
0301-4215/$ - see front matter & 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.06.045
Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect
Energy Policy journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol
Corrigendum
Corrigendum to ‘‘Missing carbon reductions? Exploring rebound and backfire effects in UK households’’ [Energy Policy 39 (2011) 3572–3581] Angela Druckman a,n, Mona Chitnis a, Steve Sorrell b, Tim Jackson a a b
ESRC Research Group on Lifestyles, Values and Environment (RESOLVE), University of Surrey, UK Sussex Energy Group, University of Sussex, UK
GHG emissions (tCO2e)
An incorrect graph was produced in Fig. 1b and the correct graph is shown below. The second sentence in Section 4.1 should read as: Fig. 1a–c illustrates that whereas, for example, gas accounts for only around 1% of total expenditure, it is one of the categories with the highest GHG emissions. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience this may have caused to the readers of the journal.
5.0 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0
Fig. 1. (b) Average annual UK household GHG emissions (2008).
n
DOI of original article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.03.058 Corresponding author. Tel.: þ44 1483 686679; fax: þ44 1483 686671. E-mail address: [email protected] (A. Druckman).
0301-4215/$ - see front matter & 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.06.045