- Email: [email protected]
Corrigendum to “Optimal scheduling of household appliances for demand response” [Electr. Power Syst. Res. 116 (November) (2014) 24–28]
Electric Power Systems Research 130 (2016) 220–221
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Electric Power Systems Research journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/epsr
Corrigendum
Corrigendum to “Optimal scheduling of household appliances for demand response” [Electr. Power Syst. Res. 116 (November) (2014) 24–28] Ditiro Setlhaolo a,∗ , Xiaohua Xia a , Jiangfeng Zhang b a b
Centre of New Energy Systems, Department of Electrical, Electronic and Computer Engineering, University of Pretoria, South Africa Department of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, University of Strathclyde, United Kingdom
The authors regret the data in Tables 2 and 3 of the manuscript have not been captured correctly. The corrected tables are presented below. The authors would like to emphasize that the changes in these tables have no direct impact on the outcome of the solution nor the discussions as confirmed in the code and demonstrated in the following examples: - EWH optimal solution as presented in the corrected table shows t25–t36 and t103–t112, t121, t122, this is in line with the graphically presented results in Fig. 1. Hence it does not affect Fig. 2 results. - The optimal operation status of ‘Dishwasher’ shows the optimal results of t118–t120 and these are also in line with Fig. 1. - ‘Tumble dryer’ has optimal switching status of t118–t120. It has also been confirmed with other appliances that do not appear in the figure. The overall corrections do not have impact on the results of both Figs. 1 and 2. The authors would like to apologize for any inconvenience caused.
Table 2 Appliances data. No.
Appliance
Power rating (kW)
Duration Ni (min)
di
ei
1
Stove
3.000
2 3
Microwave Kettle
1.230 1.900
4 5 6 7
Toaster Steam iron Vacuum cleaner Electric water heater
1.010 1.235 1.200 2.600
Dishwasher Washing machine Tumble dryer
2.500 3.000 3.300
30 50 10 10 10 10 48 30 120 120 150 45 30
30 96 96 33 106 30 96 48 24 96 120 96 96
42 120 114 45 120 42 126 62 49 132 144 132 122
8 9 10
DOI of original article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2014.04.012. ∗ Corresponding author. Tel.: +27 12 4206407; fax: +27 12 3625000. E-mail addresses: [email protected] (D. Setlhaolo), [email protected] (X. Xia), [email protected] (J. Zhang). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2015.09.002 0378-7796/© 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
D. Setlhaolo et al. / Electric Power Systems Research 130 (2016) 220–221 Table 3 The baseline and optimal appliance commitment status. No.
Appliance
ubl and uopt
Stove
ubl 1,t
t37 − t39 , t108 − t112
2
Microwave
u1,t ubl 2,t
t37 − t39 , t102 − t106 t108
3
Kettle
u2,t ubl 3,t
t104 t39 , t109
4
Toaster
u3,t ubl 4,t
t39 , t113 t31
5
Iron
6
Vacuum cleaner
u4,t ubl 5,t opt u5,t ubl 6,t
t31 t108 –t112 t97 –t101 t54 –t56
7
EWH
8
Dishwasher
u6,t ubl 7,t opt u7,t ubl 8,t
t54 –t56 t25 − t36 , t105 − t116 t25 − t36 , t103 − t112 , t121 , t122 t119 –t133
Washing machine
u8,t ubl 9,t
t121 –t135 t111 –t115
Tumble dryer
u9,t ubl 10,t
t97 –t101 t120 –t122
u10,t
t118 –t120
1
opt
opt
opt
opt
opt
opt
9
opt
10
opt
221
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Electric Power Systems Research journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/epsr
Corrigendum
Corrigendum to “Optimal scheduling of household appliances for demand response” [Electr. Power Syst. Res. 116 (November) (2014) 24–28] Ditiro Setlhaolo a,∗ , Xiaohua Xia a , Jiangfeng Zhang b a b
Centre of New Energy Systems, Department of Electrical, Electronic and Computer Engineering, University of Pretoria, South Africa Department of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, University of Strathclyde, United Kingdom
The authors regret the data in Tables 2 and 3 of the manuscript have not been captured correctly. The corrected tables are presented below. The authors would like to emphasize that the changes in these tables have no direct impact on the outcome of the solution nor the discussions as confirmed in the code and demonstrated in the following examples: - EWH optimal solution as presented in the corrected table shows t25–t36 and t103–t112, t121, t122, this is in line with the graphically presented results in Fig. 1. Hence it does not affect Fig. 2 results. - The optimal operation status of ‘Dishwasher’ shows the optimal results of t118–t120 and these are also in line with Fig. 1. - ‘Tumble dryer’ has optimal switching status of t118–t120. It has also been confirmed with other appliances that do not appear in the figure. The overall corrections do not have impact on the results of both Figs. 1 and 2. The authors would like to apologize for any inconvenience caused.
Table 2 Appliances data. No.
Appliance
Power rating (kW)
Duration Ni (min)
di
ei
1
Stove
3.000
2 3
Microwave Kettle
1.230 1.900
4 5 6 7
Toaster Steam iron Vacuum cleaner Electric water heater
1.010 1.235 1.200 2.600
Dishwasher Washing machine Tumble dryer
2.500 3.000 3.300
30 50 10 10 10 10 48 30 120 120 150 45 30
30 96 96 33 106 30 96 48 24 96 120 96 96
42 120 114 45 120 42 126 62 49 132 144 132 122
8 9 10
DOI of original article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2014.04.012. ∗ Corresponding author. Tel.: +27 12 4206407; fax: +27 12 3625000. E-mail addresses: [email protected] (D. Setlhaolo), [email protected] (X. Xia), [email protected] (J. Zhang). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2015.09.002 0378-7796/© 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
D. Setlhaolo et al. / Electric Power Systems Research 130 (2016) 220–221 Table 3 The baseline and optimal appliance commitment status. No.
Appliance
ubl and uopt
Stove
ubl 1,t
t37 − t39 , t108 − t112
2
Microwave
u1,t ubl 2,t
t37 − t39 , t102 − t106 t108
3
Kettle
u2,t ubl 3,t
t104 t39 , t109
4
Toaster
u3,t ubl 4,t
t39 , t113 t31
5
Iron
6
Vacuum cleaner
u4,t ubl 5,t opt u5,t ubl 6,t
t31 t108 –t112 t97 –t101 t54 –t56
7
EWH
8
Dishwasher
u6,t ubl 7,t opt u7,t ubl 8,t
t54 –t56 t25 − t36 , t105 − t116 t25 − t36 , t103 − t112 , t121 , t122 t119 –t133
Washing machine
u8,t ubl 9,t
t121 –t135 t111 –t115
Tumble dryer
u9,t ubl 10,t
t97 –t101 t120 –t122
u10,t
t118 –t120
1
opt
opt
opt
opt
opt
opt
9
opt
10
opt
221