- Email: [email protected]
Corrigendum to “Partitioning evapotranspiration, yield prediction and economic returns of maize under various irrigation management strategies” [Agric. Water Manage. 135 (2014) 27–39]
Agricultural Water Management 141 (2014) 84
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Agricultural Water Management journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat
Corrigendum
Corrigendum to “Partitioning evapotranspiration, yield prediction and economic returns of maize under various irrigation management strategies” [Agric. Water Manage. 135 (2014) 27–39] P. Paredes, G.C. Rodrigues, I. Alves, L.S. Pereira ∗ CEER, Institute of Agronomy, University of Lisbon, Tapada da Ajuda, 1349-017 Lisbon, Portugal
The authors regret that Table 9 was wrongly formatted which may lead to a misinterpretation of the information provided. The correct version of Table 9 is below: The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused. Table 9 Evaporation (Es , mm) and actual and maximum transpiration (Tc and Ta , mm) for the three crop growth stages of the maize crop, Alpiarc¸a. Year
Field
Crop growth stages Initial and vegetative Es (mm)
Ta (mm)
Maturation
Es /ETc adj (%)
Es (mm)
Ta (mm)
48 88
74 63
19 9
89 91
Tc (mm)
Seasonal
Es /ETc adj (%)
Es (mm)
Ta (mm)
Tc (mm)
Es /ETc adj (%)
Es /ETc adj (%)
101 139
18 9
51 53
341 287
366 296
13 16
29 29
1 2
128 123
2011
1
158
150
150
51
4
90
90
4
16
285
285
5
25
2012
2 3
112 108
193 194
193 194
37 36
5 3
86 98
86 98
5 3
13 9
317 214
317 214
4 4
18 19
2010
44 73
Flowering Tc (mm)
DOI of original article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2013.12.010. ∗ Corresponding author. E-mail addresses: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] (L.S. Pereira). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2014.04.001 0378-3774/© 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Agricultural Water Management journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat
Corrigendum
Corrigendum to “Partitioning evapotranspiration, yield prediction and economic returns of maize under various irrigation management strategies” [Agric. Water Manage. 135 (2014) 27–39] P. Paredes, G.C. Rodrigues, I. Alves, L.S. Pereira ∗ CEER, Institute of Agronomy, University of Lisbon, Tapada da Ajuda, 1349-017 Lisbon, Portugal
The authors regret that Table 9 was wrongly formatted which may lead to a misinterpretation of the information provided. The correct version of Table 9 is below: The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused. Table 9 Evaporation (Es , mm) and actual and maximum transpiration (Tc and Ta , mm) for the three crop growth stages of the maize crop, Alpiarc¸a. Year
Field
Crop growth stages Initial and vegetative Es (mm)
Ta (mm)
Maturation
Es /ETc adj (%)
Es (mm)
Ta (mm)
48 88
74 63
19 9
89 91
Tc (mm)
Seasonal
Es /ETc adj (%)
Es (mm)
Ta (mm)
Tc (mm)
Es /ETc adj (%)
Es /ETc adj (%)
101 139
18 9
51 53
341 287
366 296
13 16
29 29
1 2
128 123
2011
1
158
150
150
51
4
90
90
4
16
285
285
5
25
2012
2 3
112 108
193 194
193 194
37 36
5 3
86 98
86 98
5 3
13 9
317 214
317 214
4 4
18 19
2010
44 73
Flowering Tc (mm)
DOI of original article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2013.12.010. ∗ Corresponding author. E-mail addresses: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] (L.S. Pereira). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2014.04.001 0378-3774/© 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.