- Email: [email protected]
Corrigendum to “Thermodynamic assessment of the Mo–Re binary system” [J. Alloys Compd. 464 (2008) 190–196]
Journal of Alloys and Compounds 482 (2009) 557–558
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Journal of Alloys and Compounds journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jallcom
Corrigendum
Corrigendum to “Thermodynamic assessment of the Mo–Re binary system” [J. Alloys Compd. 464 (2008) 190–196] Pingli Mao a,b , Ke Han a,∗ , Yan Xin a a b
National High Magnetic Field Laboratory, Florida State University, 1800 E. Paul Dirac Dr., Tallahassee, FL 32310, United States School of Materials Science and Engineering, Shenyang University of Technology, Shenyang 110023, PR China
An article of this title was published in the Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 464 (2008) 190–196. Unfortunately, errors occurred in Tables 1 and 3 in the published article. We are making correction in this corrigendum and the correction will not affect or modify the results and conclusions of this paper. Two tables are displayed below together with descriptions of where were the errors. In Table 1, “Liquid + (Mo) + ” should read “Liquid = (Mo) + ”; “ + (Mo) + ” should read “ = (Mo) + ” and “[8]” in the last row should read “present work”. Therefore, Table 1 should be as follows. Table 1 The experimental and calculated invariant reactions of the Mo–Re system. Invariant reactions
+ liquid = (Mo)
Reaction type
Peritectic
T (K)
2973
Liquid = (Mo) +
Eutectics
2713 2778 2745
Liquid + (Re) =
Peritectic
2793 2843 2918 2966
+ (Re) =
Peritectoid
2073–2123 ∼2123 2353 2129
= (Mo) +
Eutectoid
1373–1423 1375
Re (at.%)
Ref.
liq.
(Mo)
–
–
42
liq.
(Mo)
50 48.9 46
43 – 41
– – 54
liq
(Re)
– – – 60
85 90 – 87
72 62 ∼68 70
(Re)
– – – 70
– – – 89
76.5 78 75 78
(Mo)
– 57
– 29
– 76
[8]
[7] [9] Present work
[7] [9] [9] Present work
[7] [8] [9] Present work
[7] Present work
In Table 3, “0 Lliq = −123,776” should read “0 Lliq = −12,376”, and “1 Lbcc = −3392.1” should read “1 Lbcc = −33,292.1”. Therefore, Table 3 should be as follows.
DOI of original article:10.1016/j.jallcom.2007.10.060. ∗ Corresponding author. Tel.: +1 850 644 6746; fax: +1 850 644 0867. E-mail addresses: [email protected] (P. Mao), [email protected] (K. Han), [email protected] (Y. Xin). 0925-8388/$ – see front matter © 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2009.04.081
558
P. Mao et al. / Journal of Alloys and Compounds 482 (2009) 557–558 Table 3 Thermodynamic parameters for Mo–Re system (J/mol of the formula unit).
Liquid
Model of 1
Model of 2
0 liq
=12,376 =31,075
−12,221 −31,378.5
= 2817.5 − 2.1T = 33,292.1
−1680.3 − 2.46T −33,524
L L
1 liq
bcc
0 bcc
L L
1 bcc
hcp
0 hcp
= −348, 104.6 + 28.9T GRe:Mo:Re GRe:Mo:Mo = −70, 326.4 − 121.7T 0 LRe:Mo:Re,Mo = +311, 547.9
GRe:Mo:Re = −418, 491 − 103.9T GRe:Mo:Mo = −487, 806.2 − 3.84T
L
= +7151
+7496 −359,086.8 + 32.1T −45,347.9 − 156.2T +318,878.5 −416,605.2 − 101.6T −341,365.8 − 7.72T
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Journal of Alloys and Compounds journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jallcom
Corrigendum
Corrigendum to “Thermodynamic assessment of the Mo–Re binary system” [J. Alloys Compd. 464 (2008) 190–196] Pingli Mao a,b , Ke Han a,∗ , Yan Xin a a b
National High Magnetic Field Laboratory, Florida State University, 1800 E. Paul Dirac Dr., Tallahassee, FL 32310, United States School of Materials Science and Engineering, Shenyang University of Technology, Shenyang 110023, PR China
An article of this title was published in the Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 464 (2008) 190–196. Unfortunately, errors occurred in Tables 1 and 3 in the published article. We are making correction in this corrigendum and the correction will not affect or modify the results and conclusions of this paper. Two tables are displayed below together with descriptions of where were the errors. In Table 1, “Liquid + (Mo) + ” should read “Liquid = (Mo) + ”; “ + (Mo) + ” should read “ = (Mo) + ” and “[8]” in the last row should read “present work”. Therefore, Table 1 should be as follows. Table 1 The experimental and calculated invariant reactions of the Mo–Re system. Invariant reactions
+ liquid = (Mo)
Reaction type
Peritectic
T (K)
2973
Liquid = (Mo) +
Eutectics
2713 2778 2745
Liquid + (Re) =
Peritectic
2793 2843 2918 2966
+ (Re) =
Peritectoid
2073–2123 ∼2123 2353 2129
= (Mo) +
Eutectoid
1373–1423 1375
Re (at.%)
Ref.
liq.
(Mo)
–
–
42
liq.
(Mo)
50 48.9 46
43 – 41
– – 54
liq
(Re)
– – – 60
85 90 – 87
72 62 ∼68 70
(Re)
– – – 70
– – – 89
76.5 78 75 78
(Mo)
– 57
– 29
– 76
[8]
[7] [9] Present work
[7] [9] [9] Present work
[7] [8] [9] Present work
[7] Present work
In Table 3, “0 Lliq = −123,776” should read “0 Lliq = −12,376”, and “1 Lbcc = −3392.1” should read “1 Lbcc = −33,292.1”. Therefore, Table 3 should be as follows.
DOI of original article:10.1016/j.jallcom.2007.10.060. ∗ Corresponding author. Tel.: +1 850 644 6746; fax: +1 850 644 0867. E-mail addresses: [email protected] (P. Mao), [email protected] (K. Han), [email protected] (Y. Xin). 0925-8388/$ – see front matter © 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2009.04.081
558
P. Mao et al. / Journal of Alloys and Compounds 482 (2009) 557–558 Table 3 Thermodynamic parameters for Mo–Re system (J/mol of the formula unit).
Liquid
Model of 1
Model of 2
0 liq
=12,376 =31,075
−12,221 −31,378.5
= 2817.5 − 2.1T = 33,292.1
−1680.3 − 2.46T −33,524
L L
1 liq
bcc
0 bcc
L L
1 bcc
hcp
0 hcp
= −348, 104.6 + 28.9T GRe:Mo:Re GRe:Mo:Mo = −70, 326.4 − 121.7T 0 LRe:Mo:Re,Mo = +311, 547.9
GRe:Mo:Re = −418, 491 − 103.9T GRe:Mo:Mo = −487, 806.2 − 3.84T
L
= +7151
+7496 −359,086.8 + 32.1T −45,347.9 − 156.2T +318,878.5 −416,605.2 − 101.6T −341,365.8 − 7.72T