Corrosion resistance of ZrO2–TiO2 nanocomposite multilayer thin films coated on carbon steel in hydrochloric acid solution

Corrosion resistance of ZrO2–TiO2 nanocomposite multilayer thin films coated on carbon steel in hydrochloric acid solution

    Corrosion resistance of ZrO 2 -TiO2 nanocomposite multilayer thin films coated on carbon steel in hydrochloric acid solution Hany M. ...

2MB Sizes 8 Downloads 130 Views

    Corrosion resistance of ZrO 2 -TiO2 nanocomposite multilayer thin films coated on carbon steel in hydrochloric acid solution Hany M. Abd El-Lateef, Mai M. Khalaf PII: DOI: Reference:

S1044-5803(15)00305-8 doi: 10.1016/j.matchar.2015.08.010 MTL 8006

To appear in:

Materials Characterization

Received date: Revised date: Accepted date:

30 June 2015 8 August 2015 15 August 2015

Please cite this article as: Abd El-Lateef Hany M., Khalaf Mai M., Corrosion resistance of ZrO2 -TiO2 nanocomposite multilayer thin films coated on carbon steel in hydrochloric acid solution, Materials Characterization (2015), doi: 10.1016/j.matchar.2015.08.010

This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Corrosion resistance of ZrO2-TiO2 nanocomposite multilayer thin films coated on carbon steel in hydrochloric acid solution

T

Hany M. Abd El-Lateef*, Mai M. Khalaf

SC R

IP

Chemistry Department, Faculty of Science, Sohag University, 82524 Sohag, Egypt

Abstract

NU

This work reports the achievement of preparing of x% zirconia (ZrO2)-titania (TiO2) composite coatings with different ZrO2 percent on the carbon steel by dipping substrates in

MA

sol–gel solutions. The prepared coated samples were investigated by various surface techniques including X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM),

D

transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy

TE

(EDAX). Open-circuit potential (OCP), potentiodynamic polarization, and electrochemical

CE P

impedance spectroscopy (EIS) methods were employed to investigate the corrosion resistance of the coated carbon steel substrates in 1.0 M HCl solution at 50 °C. The data showed that, the corrosion protection property is not always proportional to the percent of

AC

ZrO2. It can be inferred that there is an optimum percent (10%ZrO2) for beneficial effects of loading ZrO2 on the protection efficiency (7.890%), while higher loading percent of ZrO2 in the sol–gel coating leads to the formation of a fragile film with poor barrier properties. EDAX/SEM suggests that the metal surface was protected through coating with ZrO2-TiO2 composite films. Keywords: ZrO2-TiO2 Composite; Coating; Corrosion protection; SEM; TEM; XRD * Corresponding author: Fax: (+2)-093 -4601159, Tel: (+2)-010-92-593-198 E-mail address: [email protected] (Hany M. Abd El-Lateef) [email protected] (Mai M. Khalaf)

1

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1. Introduction Carbon steel is a common constructional material for many industrial units because of low cost and its excellent mechanical properties [1]. It has, however, limited service life

T

unless effective measures are taken to improve its corrosion and wear resistance properties

IP

[2–6]. Solutions of hydrochloric acid are use for pickling, chemical and electrochemical

SC R

etching of carbon steel alloys [7]. One of the most effective methods for protecting the surface of metals and alloys against corrosion in aggressive acidic solutions is used the

NU

coating process [8].

Ceramic based coatings are increasingly used for range of industrial applications to

MA

provide wear and erosion resistance, thermal insulation, and corrosion protection [9-10]. Titania and titania based composite coatings on metal surface have always been a research

D

focus for their versatile applications. They can be used as functional materials such as

TE

pollutant degradation, catalyzing, water-purifications, biomedical materials, solar cells and

CE P

protective materials such as protective layers on metals surface to improve the wear and corrosion resistance [11–15]. ZrO2-TiO2 compositions have gained use as a good thermal barrier coating due to their properties as a combined material. Titania and titania based

AC

composite coatings may be prepared by various techniques such as physical vapor deposition (PVD), chemical vapor deposition (CVD), ion assisted deposition, plasma spray and sol–gel [16]. The sol–gel method appears to be promising as it is low cost, offers good adhesion to metallic surface via chemical bonding, and easy adaptability in industries due to its simple application procedure. One of the main advantages of sol–gel method is its capacity to yield coatings with a wide range of compositions on different substrates without limitation of size or geometry of the work piece [17]. The preparation of coating by dipping substrates in sol–gel solutions is an established method to produce homogeneous coatings with uniform thickness below 2 μm [18]. In the literature, some oxide ceramic coatings with very low electronic conductance

2

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT such as TiO2 [19], SiO2 [20], Al2O3 [21, 22], ZrO2 [23], or mixed oxides composite coatings [24] have been reported as corrosion protection. The most of these ceramic coatings fabricated by sol–gel method, however, always shows surface cracks that come

T

from gel decomposition at high temperature. These cracks allow penetration of corrosive

IP

media through the coating to directly contact the carbon steel substrate, leading to

SC R

occurrence of severe corrosion at the coating/substrate interface. To reduce the amount of such cracks, another kind of nanoparticles of x% ZrO2 has been incorporated to form a

NU

ZrO2-TiO2 composite coating in this work.

In view of above, an attempt has been made to increase the corrosion resistance of carbon

MA

steel by depositing x% ZrO2-TiO2 composite coating. This paper reports the achievement of preparing of ZrO2-TiO2 composite coatings on carbon steel by dipping substrates in sol–gel

D

solutions. The coatings were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), transmission

TE

electron microscopy (TEM), energy dispersive X-ray analysis (EDAX) and scanning

CE P

electron microscope (SEM). The performance of the coated carbon steel samples against corrosion was evaluated in 1.0 M HCl solution at 50 °C by means of open-circuit potential (OCP), potentiodynamic polarization, and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy

AC

measurements.

2. Experimental work 2.1. Carbon steel (C Steel) substrate composition Carbon steel substrate C1018 used for this study has the following composition (wt%): C 0.18 %, Si 0.24%, Mn 0.50%, P 0.05%, S 0.05%, Ni 0.01%, Cr 0.10% and Fe balance. Chemical composition of the electrode was determined by Energy dispersive Xray fluorescence (EDRF) (HORIBA XGT-7000). Before the deposition of films, the carbon steel specimens were first polished with a series of emery paper (grade 320–400–600–800–1000–1200) and then by polishing

3

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT machine (Buehler, Lake Bluff, Illinois USA), until their surfaces became smooth and mirror like bright. The substrates were degreased ultrasonically in acetone and subsequently dried prior to the deposition process.

T

2.2. Preparation of the x% ZrO2-TiO2 Nanocomposite samples

IP

In the present work, sol-gel method is used for the synthesis of nanostrucured ZrO2–

SC R

TiO2 films with various Zr-contents (5, 10, and 20 wt %) based on using zirconyl chloride (ZrOCl2) compound as a source of doping agent ions. Titanium isopropoxide (TTIP; Ti-

NU

(iOPr)4), (Aldrich 99.9% pure liquid) was mixed into isopropyl alcohol (iPr-OH; as organic solvent of titanium isopropoxide precursor), and stirred with a magnetic stir bar for

MA

approximately 30 min prior to synthesis thus for good dispersity of Ti4+ ions and to prepare the precursor solution of sol-gel process. Thereafter, ZrOCl2 dissolved in bi distilled water

D

were added dropwise in their stoichiometric ratio under vigorous stirring to the previous

TE

formed sol. Simultaneously nitric acid as catalyst and acetyl acetones (ACAC) as chelating agent were added (refer to Fig. 1) such that the molar ratio TTIP: iPr-OH: HNO3: ACAC

CE P

equals to 1:35.3:0.5:0.8 and stirring until complete dissolution. The obtained suspension was transparent and stirred for 2 h and then aged overnight until gel formed. Finally, the

AC

porous nanocomposite films were obtained after heat treatment for 3 h at 550 °C in air. The prepared coated ZrO2-TiO2 thin films were abbreviated as follows: x% ZT where x=5, 10 and 20% of doped Zr. Afterwards, the carbon steel substrates were coated by three times dip-coating with sample solutions film 5%ZT, film 10%ZT, and film 20%ZT, and the dip coating withdrawal rate was 10 cm/min. Consequently, the resulting coated carbon steel substrates were dried in a furnace at 90 °C for 1 h and then, thermally treated at 550 °C for 3 h with heating rate of 10 °C/min. This process was repeated in a periodically way for each coated layer. The coated layers of 5%ZT, 10%ZT and 20%ZT films were described by x%ZT1, x%ZT2 and x%ZT3, where the digits 1, 2 and 3 refer to the number of the coated layers.

4

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT <
> 2.3. Coating samples Characterization

T

The degree of crystallinity and phase compositions of the x% ZrO2-TiO2 powdered

IP

samples calcined at 550 °C were studied by means of x-ray diffraction method (XRD) using

SC R

TD-3500 diffractometer at room temperature with Ni-filtered Cu Kα radiation (λ = 0.15418 Å), at 35 kv and 25 mA. The average crystallite size was calculated according to the

D

k  cos 

NU

Scherrer’s equation,

(1)

MA

where D is the mean crystallite size, k (0.89) is the Scherrer constant,  is the X-ray wavelength (0.15418 Å), and  is the relative value of the full-width at half-maximum

D

(FWHM) of the (101) diffraction peak of catalysts. Transmission electron microscopy

TE

(TEM) images of calcined ZrO2-TiO2 films with different loading ratio were obtained on

CE P

Jeol TEM-1230 electron microscope at an acceleration voltage 120 kV, and at magnifications 50000x and 80000x. The morphology and microstructure and elemental composition of the deposited films on carbon steel substrates before corrosion test were

AC

studied by means of the scanning electron microscopy equipped with the EDAX detector.

2.4. Electrochemical measurements Electrochemical measurements were carried out in a three-electrode cell in 1.0 M HCl using VersaSTAT 4 potentiostat/galvanostat with a frequency response analyzer (FRA) contained in a single unit and connected with laptop. All solutions were prepared from grade chemicals (Merck) and bidistilled water. Saturated calomel electrode (SCE), the coated and uncoated carbon steel specimens, and platinum plate electrode were chosen as reference electrode, working electrode and counter electrode, respectively8 The specimen surfaces in contact with the solution had a constant area of 4.55 cm2. It has been reported

5

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT that, the corrosion rate of carbon steel is temperature dependent, and the corrosion rate has the largest value at 50 °C [25]. Therefore, in order to evaluate the protection effect of the coated samples on carbon steel in HCl solution, all the experiments were performed at 50

T

°C in the following order: The open circuit potential vs. time for 0.5 hour, the polarization

IP

measurements were recorded by sweeping the potential from −250 mV to +250 mV with

SC R

respect to corrosion potential (Ecorr) at scan rate of 1 mV/s. The data obtained were analyzed by Tafel extrapolation method. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS)

NU

measurements were performed at open circuit potential. The range of applied frequencies was from 100 kHz to 0.05 Hz using voltage perturbation amplitude of 10 mV RMS.

MA

2.5. Surface characterization after exposure to 1.0 M HCl In order to observe any changes in surface morphologies of the carbon steel

D

substrate after exposure to 1.0 M HCl, the specimens were first immersed in the corrosive

TE

media with and without coating for 5 days, then cleaned with bi-distilled water and acetone,

CE P

and dried with cool air then the topography of the tested samples was observed by using scanning electron microscope (SEM) conducted with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy

AC

analysis (EDAX) (SEM-EDAX) (JEOL, model 5300).

3. Results and discussion 1.3. Characterization of x% ZrO2-TiO2 films 3.1.1. XRD Analysis. The XRD patterns of blank TiO2, and doped samples of x wt % ZrO2-TiO2, (x=5, 10, and 20) calcined at 550 °C (powdered samples) are shown in Fig. 2a-d. The diffraction peaks of anatase TiO2 can be observed in all samples (Card No JCPDS 21-1272). It was noted that; the doped samples with x wt % ZrO2-TiO2 show the (101) peaks broader than that of TiO2. The present observations indicate that, the lattice structure of TiO2 is locally

6

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT deformed by incorporation of dopant Zr ions into TiO2 [26-28]. From XRD pattern of TiO2 blank, it was found that mixed rutile and anatase phases were formed and as a result of incorporation of Zr ions, the rutile phase slightly disappeared. It was further noted that, the

T

addition of Zr4+ has facilitated the formation of anatase phase than rutile phase. The lattice

IP

parameters of the samples were measured using (101) and (200) in anatase crystal planes to

equations (2) and (3):

d-2(hkl)= h2a-2+k2b-2+l2c-2

 2 sin 

NU

Braggs equation : d (hkl) 

SC R

study the effect of Zr% content as dopant on the lattice structure of TiO2, by using

(2) (3)

MA

where d(hkl) is the distance between crystal planes of (hkl),  is the X-ray wavelength, θ is the diffraction angle of crystal plane (hkl), hkl is the crystal index, and a, b and c are lattice

D

parameters (in anatase form, a=b≠ c tetragonal structure). The results are indexed in Table

TE

1. Lattice parameters calculation showed that, the lattice parameters of all TiO2 samples

CE P

remain almost constant along the a- and b- axes, whereas c-axis parameter differs due to the presence of Zr as the ionic radius of Zr4+ as dopant differs than that of Ti4+ [27-29]. Which allows for possible diffusion of Zr4+ along the c-axis to substitute Ti4+ in TiO2, the average

AC

crystallite size of samples (Table 1) was measured by the Scherrer’s equation from the (101) peak of anatase TiO2. The average crystallite size of TiO2 is 19.7 nm and doped titania samples with 5, 10 and 20% ZrO2-TiO2 are 15.8, 10.0 and 12.3 nm, respectively. When the comparison is made within the ZrO2-TiO2 series, increase in the Zr-content to 10% decreases the size. This is because the crystallite growth in the TiO2 lattices suppresses as Zr replaces Ti4+ ions during the sol-gel process.

<
> <>

7

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 3.1.2. TEM analysis Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was used to investigate the morphology of samples and particle size as shown in Fig. 3. All presented samples had small

T

semispherical particles and almost of equivalent particle size that aggregated with

IP

increasing zirconium loading. Although the aggregation of their primary particles forming

SC R

larger clusters on the surface but a decreasing in particle sizes can be observed with higher ZrO2 content. Acquire particle size was calculated to be 17, 12, and 14 nm for doped

NU

samples with 5% ZT, 10% ZT, and 20%ZT, respectively. Thus indicates excellent agreement with the data obtained from XRD tests (Table 1). These TEM pictures

MA

demonstrate that the particles of 10% ZT well dispersed and 20% ZT appeared to be more agglomerated than the 5% ZT.

TE

D

<
>

3.1.2. SEM /EDAX analysis

CE P

To confirm the formation of the coating films calcined at 550 °C on the carbon steel surface, SEM and EDAX techniques were used to characterize the carbon steel surface.

AC

Figure 4a shows SEM image of uncoated carbon steel surface. The micrograph shows the brightness of the electrode surface without any inclusions. While, Fig. 4b revealed that, surface morphology homogenously covered with granular surface for all deposited 5% ZT films coated carbon steel. It can be inferred that the zirconium ion-doped TiO2 films offers a more efficient protection for the metals as result of its smooth and uniform surface. In Fig. 5a, we present the SEM analysis of 10% ZrO2-doped coating (one layer), which has some cracks what is probably the repercussion of the presence of higher zirconium content in the prepared sol. local cracks are visible, which result from the tensile stresses arising during heat treatment. The dense, flawless coatings of carbon steel electrodes can be obtained with the triple-layer 10% ZrO2-TiO2 coating, the micrograph of Fig. 5b shows the

8

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT surface texture of carbon steel substrates is smooth, which means that they are homogenous. Obtained results prove that, this cracking decreases with the number of layers or the thickness of the coating. It can be assumed that such coating will make a very good

T

protection against corrosion.

IP

Figure 6a shows EDAX analysis for uncoated carbon steel surface. The values are

SC R

given in weight and atomic percent. The characteristics peaks are related to the metals which

present in the alloy. However, the data in Fig. 6 b and c clearly revealed the presence of

NU

titanium, oxygen and zirconium especially increased for 10%ZT1 on the carbon steel surface. EDAX spectrums of the uncoated and coated carbon steel included in Fig. 6

MA

indicated the iron (wt %) decreased from 98.6 (uncoated carbon steel) to 81.83 % and 77.78 % for coated carbon Steel with 5%ZT, and 10%ZT, respectively. These findings are

D

evidence for homogenous and intensive coverage of the carbon steel surface with ZrO2

TE

doped titania layer.

AC

CE P

<
> <
> <
>

3.2. Electrochemical characterization 3.2.1. EOCP vs time The variation of open circuit potential (EOCP) in 1.0 M HCl as a function of immersion time for carbon steel bare and that coated with 10%ZT film (1, 2 and 3 layers) is shown in Fig. 7. From this figure it can be seen that, the carbon steel bare and that coated with 10%ZT film attained a steady state potential within 15 min of immersion indicating good chemical stability of the sol–gel TiO2 co-doped with ZrO2. By comparing the coated and uncoated samples of carbon steel, a noble shift of about -52 mV in EOCP is observed in

9

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT the case of carbon steel coated with 3 layers of 10%ZT. The shift of EOCP in noble side in case of coated samples suggests the formation of compact passive film on carbon steel surface. Carbon steel coated with 10%ZT3 showed a change in Ecorr from -483 to -534 mV

penetration of corrosive ions [30].

SC R

<
>

IP

T

vs. SCE, indicating that the formed composite material over the surface can resist the

3.2.2. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS)

NU

Figures 8 (a–c), 9 (a–c) and 10 (a–c) show Nyquist, bode modulus and bode phase

MA

of C1018 carbon steel bare and coated by three kinds of ceramic sol–gel x% ZrO2-TiO2 films (film 1, obtained from sol 5% ZrO2-TiO2; film 2, obtained form sol 10% ZrO2-TiO2; film 3 obtained from sol 20% ZrO2-TiO2) in 1.0 M HCl solution at 50 ºC. Figures 8a, 9a

TE

D

and 10a show that, the Nyquist plots of coated and uncoated samples of carbon steel at the open circuit potential (Ecorr), an analysis of the impedance at the examined potential was

CE P

made. The general shape of the curves is nearly similar for all coated samples. The difference among the Nyquist diagrams for these samples is the size of the capacitive loop

AC

that is related to the charge transfer in the corrosion process. Generally, the larger the size of the capacitive loop indicates better anticorrosion ability. Larger capacitive loops are observed for the coated samples compared to the carbon steel bare. From the measured of charge transfer resistance values, the protection efficiency (P%) of the coating could be obtained [31] :

P% 

Rct (cot .)  Rct (un cot .) 100 Rct (cot .)

(4)

where Rct(cot.) and Rct(uncot.) are the charge transfer resistance for coated and uncoated carbon steel samples, respectively. The charge transfer resistance (Rct) is able to yield information regarding the rate of the corrosion process occurring at the metal substrate beneath the coating. It is seen from the Table 2 that, Rct values increase in the case of

10

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT coated samples compared to the blank carbon steel bare and further increased as the number of layer coated increases in the investigated acidic media. The most pronounced effect was noted in the case of 10%ZT3 film with Rct value of 2153 Ω cm2 (it is 79 times

T

greater than that of unprotected steel sample). Further inspection of the data presented in

IP

Table 2 shows that, the values of Cdl decreased while the values of protection efficiency

SC R

increased as the number of coating layers increases. The high protection efficiency of composite coatings can result from mutual influence of TiO2 and ZrO2 films. Also the

NU

presence of zirconia gel in crystallizing gel of titania caused high increase in the temperature of crystallization of TiO2. This delay in crystallization can be the reason of

MA

forming diffusion barriers in the boundary between particular layers and increasing in protective properties of the layer coatings. The Cdl was calculated using the expression [32]: 1 2Cdl Rct

D

(5)

TE

f ( Z max ) 

where f(–Zmax) is at the frequency at which the imaginary component of the impedance is a

CE P

maximum. Bode modulus and bode phase plots of ZrO2-TiO2 films having different compositions and dipping times are shown in Figs. 8 (b, c), 9 (b, c) and 10 (b, c). The Bode

AC

phase exhibits two time constant, corresponding to corrosion process occurring at the carbon steel surface. For TiO2 codoped with ZrO2 coating samples showed two time constants (Figs. 8 c, 9 c and 10 c). The one in the high frequencies region (II) can be due to the x% ZrO2-TiO2 protective film. The second at lower frequencies (I) is may be associated with the EIS response of the corrosion process occurring at the x%ZrO2-TiO2/metal interface [33]. The presence of lower frequencies time constant shows that, all x% ZrO2TiO2 films exhibit somewhat of porosity as corrosion process occurs on spots where electrolyte penetrates through the pores of the coating to the carbon steel surface. Impedance spectra were fitted using the equivalent circuits given in Fig. 11. The circuits contain two RC (time constant, τ) components representing the coating/electrolyte

11

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT and coating/metal interfaces [34]. EIS spectra for carbon steel bare can be represented by simple equivalent circuit shown in Fig. 11a where Rs is the resistance of the electrolyte, Rct is charge transfer resistance of the substrate and Cdl is the double layer capacitance formed

T

at the metal solution interface. Equivalent circuit describing the behavior of carbon steel

IP

coated by x% ZrO2-TiO2 films (Fig. 11b) is commonly proposed for metal covered by

SC R

coating with defects [35]. In this circuit Rpore is the pore electrical resistance to the ionic current through the pores and Ccoat represents the coating pseudo capacitance. Figure 11c

NU

provides a physical representation of the circuit model used to inset EIS data. Similar equivalent electrical circuit was proposed by Lopez et al. [36] to describe behavior of

MA

multilayer silica-methacrylate hybrid coating on stainless steel. Table 2 presents the corresponding electrochemical parameters obtained in the

D

equivalent circuit. From this Table, the values of Rpore are increased with increasing number

TE

of coating layers. The highest Rpore (Table 2) value was obtained for the sample protected

CE P

by 10%ZT3 film indicating that this is the least porous coating. Usually, the uniform and thick coatings behave as an insulator with high resistances and low capacitances. It can be seen that the Rct values of samples coated with 10%ZT film is higher than that of the

AC

samples coated with those of 5%ZT and 20%ZT films, indicating a reduced accessibility of electrolyte due to its compact structure. The data in Table 2 also showed that, the protection efficiency was increased with increasing the number of coating layers, whereas, the Cdl values were decreased, this decrease in Cdl values could be resulted from a decrease in local dielectric constant and/or an increase in the thickness of the electrical double layer. By comparison, 10%ZT film gives higher charge transfer resistance (Rct) and lower capacitance (Cdl). This means the corrosion protection property is not always proportional to the percent of doped ZrO2. It can be inferred that there is an optimum percent (10%ZrO2) for beneficial effects of loading ZrO2 on corrosion resistance, while higher loading percent of ZrO2 (20%ZrO2) in the sol–gel coating leads to the formation of a fragile film with poor

12

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT barrier properties. This means that, the increasing of defects and cracks will be negatively affected on the formed sol–gel layer. Miyazawa et al. [37] reported that the corrosion rate of steel coated sample with ZrO2/Y2O3 layers decreased with increasing Y2O3 content. They

T

suggested that the effect could be explained by trapping of oxygen by yttria, or by diffusion

IP

of yttrium.

SC R

The data in Table 2 shows an increasing tendency of Rct by increasing of number of coated samples, and Rct represents resistance of charge transfer at the substrate/HCl

NU

interface. In particular, the values of Rct for 5% ZT3, 10% ZT3 and 20% ZT3 coated films are evidently 28, 79 and 44- fold of levels larger than that of the uncoated carbon steel. It is

MA

clear that, Rct is inversely proportional to the surface area of the sample. By assuming a unit surface area for the bare carbon steel sample and a coverage rate of θ for the coating, the

D

corroded area of the sample due to HCl solution in the coating would be (1 −θ). The charge

[38]:

(6)

CE P

AA RctRo cto  o o 11 AA RctRct  1 1  

TE

transfer resistance for both the bare carbon steel and the coated sample can be written as

(7)

AC

where Rcto and Rct are the charge transfer resistance for uncoating and coating samples of carbon steel, respectively. A0 and A are factors. Assuming A0 and A being the same, the coverage rate of θ for the composite coating is derived as below [38]:

Rcto (8) Rct Several authors has been employed the above equation to calculate the coverage rate of θ

 1

for their protective coating [39, 40]. In our study, the coverage rate of θ for the coating samples is calculated and the results are shown in Table 2, the θ value for all coated samples with one layer is rather low, a sign of poor coverage of the coating on the carbon steel substrate due to the presence of nano-scale pores. All the θ value for the 5%ZT, 10%ZT and 20%ZT composite coatings are larger than 0.965 in presences of three layers8

13

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT These three- layer coatings therefore cover the carbon steel substrate well by reducing pore sealing and coating lamination. In particular, the composite coating with 10%ZT3 film shows highest θ value (0.987) near to unity. In this case the steel substrate is best covered

T

with the composite coating and there-fore shows best anticorrosion ability.

IP

Finally, it was found that, the series of our coated samples (5%ZT, 10%ZT and

SC R

20%ZT) are more protective than TiO2 films in HCl solution, which gives maximum protection efficiency 88% in the presence of TiO2 film, three layers [41]. But the protection

NU

efficiency of our investigated coated sample 10%ZT in the presence of one layer is 7.89%, with increasing the number of layers to three the protection reaches 98.7%.

MA

<
>

D

<
>

CE P

TE

<
> <
> <
>

AC

3.2.3. Potentiodynamic polarization measurements The anticorrosion ability of the bare C1018 carbon steel and coated by ceramic sol– gel x% ZrO2-TiO2 films is evaluated by measurement of its potentiodynamic polarization curve in 1.0 M HCl solution at 50 ºC and the results are shown in Fig. 12 a, b and c. As seen in this figure, the coating samples results a marked shift in both cathodic and anodic branches of the polarization curves towards lower current densities. x%Zr/TiO2 films coated carbon steel electrode with 5% ZrO2-TiO2, 10% ZrO2-TiO2 and 20% ZrO2-TiO2 were prepared with one, two and three times coating applications of sol–gel process, respectively. It can be seen that all films with different compositions decreases the corrosion rate of unprotected carbon steel. 14

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Corrosion parameters were calculated on the basis of cathodic and anodic potential versus current density characteristics in the Tafel potential region [42, 43]. The values of the corrosion current density (Jcorr) for the investigated coated and uncoated samples were

T

determined. Steady state of open circuit corrosion potential (Ecorr) for the carbon steel bare

IP

and that for coating samples was measured after 60 min from the moment of immersion.

SC R

The electrochemical parameters Ecorr, Jcorr, protection efficiency (P %), anodic and cathodic Tafel slopes (βa, βc) obtained from the polarization measurements were listed in Table 3.

NU

The data exhibited that, all of the films have significantly reduced the corrosion current density (Jcorr), which indicates that, these films have provided good protection against the

MA

corrosive media, and the protection efficiency (P%) increases as the number of coating layers is increased. However, the maximum decrease in Jcorr (0.056 mAcm-2) was observed

D

for sample coated with three layers from 10%ZT film. From Table 3, it can be seen that Jcorr

TE

of coated samples with three layers from 5%ZT, 10%ZT and 20%ZT films is reduced by

CE P

18, 30 and 21 times, respectively as compared to bare carbon steel substrate. Nevertheless, the coating with 10%ZT3 film showed better protective properties than those obtained with film 5%ZT3 and 20%ZT3 at the same conditions, because the protection efficiency for the

AC

electrode coated with 10%ZT3 film was the highest (P%=96.7%) among all other coatings (Table 3), suggesting that at that composition a good passive coating was formed. The high anticorrosion ability for the composite coating might be related to the reciprocal influence of TiO2 and ZrO2 films. Generally for a protective coating, besides the strong resistance of the coating itself to corrosion, the coating material also provides the substrate with a complete separation from corrosive medium so that no electrochemical reaction occurs at the coating/substrate interface. From this viewpoint, a good protective coating should be dense as much as possible so that corrosive medium cannot penetrate through [44]. It needs to be noted that the corrosion potential Ecorr of ZrO2-TiO2 coated carbon steel electrode is shifted slightly toward negative values compared with that of uncoated

15

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT electrode. The shift of Ecorr in noble side in the case of coating samples suggests the formation of compact passive film on carbon steel surface. The polarization curves in Fig. 12 a, b and c indicated that, x% ZrO2-TiO2 exert a beneficial influence on protecting carbon

T

steel in 1.0 M HCl. Moreover, the anti-corrosion performance was influenced by the ZrO2

IP

content in the composite and number of coating layers (thickness). When increasing the

SC R

percent of ZrO2 in the composite, the corrosion resistance first increased up to 10% ZrO2 and then decreased.

NU

The values of cathodic Tafel slope (βc) and anodic Tafel slope (βa) were found to decreased in the case of coating samples compared that for blank carbon steel bare,

MA

indicates that, the coating of carbon steel with ZrO2-TiO2 modify the hydrogen evolution mechanism. On the other hand, the cathodic Tafel slopes (βc) are also found to be greater

D

than the respective anodic Tafel slopes (βa).

TE

Finally, it can be stated that improvement of corrosion resistance of carbon steel

CE P

substrate is due to the formation of ZrO2-TiO2 nanocomposite coatings on the electrode surface. In literatures studies [45], although the coating is porous, this porous structure is only the surface structure, namely the pores are just on the surface. So the coating can act as

AC

a barrier between the substrate and the corrosive electrolyte. The positive effect of ZrO2 incorporation can be construed considering that two metal ions of Ti4+ and Zr4+ induce for the reduction of oxygen vacancies [46], which in turn has a substantial role in the enhancement in the corrosion resistance. Results obtained show that, 10%ZT is the optimum percent in all the electrochemical methods and 10%ZT3 is a better corrosion resistance in 1.0 M HCl solution.

<
> <
>

16

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 3.3. Surface characterization after exposure to 1.0 M HCl 3.3.1. SEM analysis Figure 13 shows SEM image of the surface coated and uncoated carbon steel

IP

T

samples protection with 10% ZrO2-TiO2 film after immersion in 1.0 M HCl for 5 days at

SC R

magnification x=2000 (a) uncoated sample, (b), (c) and (d) coated samples with one, two and three layers, respectively. Inset Fig. 13 the micrographs at magnification x =500. The micrograph reveals that, the carbon steel surface immersed in 1.0 M HCl

NU

solution (Fig. 13a), exhibited that thick porous layer of corrosion product (active corrosion) covered all electrode surface; the surface is rough due to dissolution in the acidic solution.

MA

Also a large and deep pit appears. Corrosion is seen to be relatively uniform with some evidence of pitting attack. Figures 13b, 13c and 13d show SEM of the carbon steel surface

D

protection with 10% ZrO2-TiO2 film after immersion in 1.0 M HCl, coated with one, two

TE

and three layers, respectively. The micrographs revealed that, the metal is more protected

CE P

compared to the blank, and becomes smoother and free from damages. The coating film forms a good protective layer, which isolates the surface from the aggressive environment. The micrographs also reveled that, the protection ability was increased with increasing the

AC

number of coating layers.

<
>

3.3.2. EDAX analysis Figure 14 shows EDAX analysis of uncoated and coated carbon steel samples protection with 10% ZrO2-TiO2 film after immersion in 1.0 M HCl for 5 days (a) uncoated sample (b) coated with one layer, (c) coated with two layers and (d) coated with three layers.

17

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT In the case of uncoated sample, Fig. 14a exhibits the characteristic peaks which are related to Fe, Mn, P, Cr, C, Si, Cl and oxygen elements. This indicated that the corrosion product on carbon steel surface being metal oxides. Figures 14b, 14c and 14d show EDAX

T

analysis of carbon steel surface protection with 10%ZT1, 10%ZT2 and 10%ZT3 films,

IP

respectively, after immersion in 1.0 M HCl. The analysis confirmed that, the atomic content

SC R

of Fe for carbon steel immersed in HCl is 47% and after the deposition of steel in 10% ZrO2-TiO2 sol with 1, 2 and 3 layers are 70.37, 74.78 and 77.21% respectively. The atomic

NU

content percentage of Fe was increased with increasing the number of coating layers, indicates more protection. EDAX/SEM analyses proved that, the metal surface was

MA

protected through coating with x ZrO2-TiO2 films.

CE P

TE

D

<
>

4. Conclusion

In this research, we have prepared ZrO2-TiO2 nanocomposite coatings with different

AC

ZrO2 loading for carbon steel by dipping substrates in sol–gel solutions followed by a post heat treatment process, and the following conclusions can be drawn from the results above: 1. XRD measurements demonstrated that, the lattice structure of TiO2 is locally deformed by incorporation of dopant Zr4+ ions into TiO2 2. SEM results proved that, the cracking decreases with the number of layers or the thickness of the coating. It can be assumed that such coating will make a very good protection against corrosion. TEM analysis showed that, the particles of 10% ZT well dispersed and 20% ZT appeared to be more agglomerated than the 5% ZT. 3. The electrochemical measurements indicated that, the prepared films can improve the corrosion resistance of the carbon steel substrate in HCl solution. The high 18

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT protection efficiency of composite coatings can result from mutual influence of TiO2 and ZrO2 films. 4. The effect of coating compositions and dipping times was investigated and it is

T

indicated that the film having a composition of 10% ZrO2-TiO2 and 3 dipping times,

IP

have better corrosion resistance properties than other films. 10%ZrO2 loading is the

SC R

optimal percent for beneficial effects on the corrosion resistance, while higher loading percent of zirconia in the sol–gel coating leads to the formation of a fragile

NU

film with poor barrier properties.

5. Potentiodynamic polarization measurements indicated that, the Ecorr is shifted

MA

slightly towards noble values in the case of coating samples suggests the formation of compact passive film on carbon steel surface.

D

6. EDAX/SEM analyses are in agreement with the results obtained in our

TE

electrochemical measurements, which suggests that the metal surface was protected

CE P

through coating with x ZrO2-TiO2 films.

Acknowledgments

AC

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial and other supports of this research, provided by Chemistry department- Faculty of science- Sohag University, Egypt.

References [1] H. M. Abd El-Lateef, V.M. Abbasov, L.I. Aliyeva, E.E. Qasimov, I.T. Ismayilov, Inhibition of carbon steel corrosion in CO2-saturated brine using some newly surfactants based on palm oil: Experimental and theoretical investigations, Mater. Chem. Phys. 142 (2013) 502-512.

19

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT [2] M. H. Fini, A. Amadeh, Improvement of wear and corrosion resistance of AZ91 alloy

magnesium

by

applying

Ni−SiC

nanocomposite

coating

via

pulse

electrodeposition, Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 23 (2013) 2914−2922.

T

[3] S. J. Bull, R. Kingswell, K. T. Scorr, The sliding wear of plasma sprayed alumina, Surf.

IP

Coat. Technol. 82 (1996) 218-225.

SC R

[4] E.W. Brooman, Modifying organic coatings to provide corrosion resistance: Part II: Inorganic additives and inhibitors, Met. Finish 100 (2002) 42-53.

NU

[5] E.W. Brooman, Modifying organic coatings to provide corrosion resistance Part III: Organic additives and conducting polymers, Met. Finish 100 (2002) 104-110.

MA

[6] H. Wang, R. Akid, Encapsulated cerium nitrate inhibitors to provide high-performance anti-corrosion sol-gel coatings on mild steel, Corros. Sci. 50 (2008) 1142-1148.

D

[7] A. El-Sayed, Hossnia S. Mohran, Hany M. Abd El-Lateef, The inhibition effect of

TE

2,4,6-tris (2-pyridyl)-1,3,5-triazine on corrosion of tin, indium and tin–indium alloys in

CE P

hydrochloric acid solution, Corros. Sci. 52 (2010) 1976–1984. [8] S. K. Tiwari, R.K. Sahu, A.K. Pramanick, Raghuvir Singh, Development of conversion coating on mild steel prior to sol gel nanostructured Al2O3 coating for enhancement of

AC

corrosion resistance, Surf. Coat. Technol. 205 (2011) 4960–4967. [9] Y. Xie, H.M. Hawthorne, Wear mechanism of plasma-sprayed alumina coating in sliding contacts with harder asperities, Wear 225–229 (1999) 90-103. [10] R. Yılmaz, A.O. Kurt, A. Demir, Z. Tatlı, Effects of TiO2 on the mechanical properties of the Al2O3–TiO2 plasma sprayed coating, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 27 (2007) 1319-1323. [11] A. Alem, H. Sarpoolaky, Mehrdad Keshmiri, Sol–gel preparation of titania multilayer membrane for photocatalytic applications, Ceram. Int. 5 (2009) 1837–1843. [12] C. X. Shan, X.H.K.L. Choy, P. Choquet, Improvement in corrosion resistance of CrN coated stainless steel by conformal TiO2 deposition, Surf. Coat. Technol. 10 (2008) 2147–2151.

20

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT [13] J. Huang, T. Shinohara, S. Tsujikawa, Protection of carbon steel from atmospheric corrosion by TiO2 coating, Zario-to -kankyo 48 (1999) 75–582. [14] J. Huang, T. Shinohara, S. Tsujikawa, Effects of interfacial iron oxides on corrosion

T

protection of carbon steel by TiO2 coating under illumination, Zario-to -kankyo 46

IP

(1997) 651–661.

SC R

[15] Y. Ohko, S. Saitoh, T. Tatsuma, A. Fujishima, Photoelectrochemica anticorrosion and self-cleaning effects of a TiO2 coating for type 304 stainless steel, J. Eelectrochem.

NU

Soc. 1 (2001) B24–B28.

[16] Y. Wang, W. Tian, T. Zhang,Y. Yang, Microstructure, spallation and corrosion of

MA

plasma sprayed Al2O3-13%TiO2 coatings, Corros. Sci. 51 (2009) 2924-2931. [17] C. J. Brinker, A. J. Hurd, P. R. Schunk, G. C. Frye and C.S. Ashley, Review of sol-gel

D

thin film formation, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 147/148 (1992) 424-436.

TE

[18] A. Pepe, M. Aparicio, S. Ceré, A. Durán, Synthesis of hybrid silica sol–gel coatings

CE P

containing Zn particles on carbon steel and Al/Zn coated carbon steel, Mater Lett. 59 (2005) 3937–3940.

[19] M. Li, Y. Q. Yang, L. Liu, J.M. Hu, J. Q. Zhang, Electro-assisted preparation of

AC

dodecyltrimethoxysilane/TiO2 composite films for corrosion protection of AA2024T3 (aluminum alloy), Electrochim. Acta 55 (2010) 3008-3012. [20] N. Chen, M. Y. Liu, W.D. Zhou, Fouling and corrosion properties of SiO2 coatings on copper in geothermal water, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 51 (2012) 6001-6017. [21] B. Diaz, E. Haerkoenen, J. Swiatowska, V. Maurice, A. Seyeux, P. Marcus, M. Ritala, Low-temperature atomic layer deposition of Al2O3 thin coatings for corrosion protection of steel: surface and electrochemical analysis, Corro. Sci. 53 (2011) 21682175.

21

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT [22] M. Zheng, M. Sakairi, H. Jha, Influence of desiccation procedures on the surface wettability and corrosion resistance of porous aluminium anodic oxide films, Corro. Sci. 55 (2012) 332-338.

T

[23] M. Behzadnasab, S. M. Mirabedini, K. Kabiri, S. Jamali, Corrosion performance of

SC R

NaCl solution, Corro. Sci. 53 (2010) 89-98.

IP

epoxy coatings containing silane treated ZrO2 nanoparticles on mild steel in 3.5%

[24] A. I. Abdulagatov, Y. Yan, J. R. Cooper, Y. Z. Zhang, M. Gibbs, A.S. Cavanagh, R.G.

NU

Yang, Y.C. Lee, S.M. George, Al2O3 and TiO2 atomic layer deposition on copper for water corrosion resistance, ACS Appl. Mate.r Inter. 3 (2011) 4593-4601.

MA

[25] A. Munoz, J. Genesca, R. Duran, J. Mendoza, Mechanism of FeCO3 formation on API X70 pipeline steel in brine solutions containing CO2, Proc. NACE Corros. 2005

D

(paper No. 052 97).

TE

[26] T. Ohno, M. Akiyoshi, T. Umebayashi, K. Asai, T. Mitsui, M. Matsumura, Preparation

CE P

of S-doped TiO2 photocatalysts and their photocatalytic activities under visible light, Appl. Catal. A 265 (2004) 115-121. [27] J. C. Yu, J. Lin, R. W. M. Kwok, Ti1-xZrxO2 Solid Solutions for the Photocatalytic

AC

Degradation of Acetone in Air, J. Phys. Chem. B 102 (1998) 5094-5098. [28] H. Sun, Y. Bai, Y. Cheng, W. Jin, N. Xu, Preparation and characterization of visiblelight-driven carbon-sulfur-codoped TiO2 photocatalysts, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 45 (2006) 4971-4976. [29] J. C. Yu, W. Ho, J. Yu, H. Yip, P. K. Wong, J. Zhao, Efficient visible-light-induced photocatalytic disinfection on sulfur-doped nanocrystalline titania, J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 39 (2005) 1175-1179. [30] S. Abaci, B. Nessark, Characterization and corrosion protection properties of composite material (PANI+TiO2) coatings on A304 stainless steel, J. Coat. Technol. Res. 12 (2015) 107-120.

22

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT [31] T. Siva, S. Mayavan, S. S. Sreejakumari S. Sathiyanarayanan, Mesoporous silica based reservoir for the active protection of mild steel in an aggressive chloride ion environment, RSC Adv. 5 ( 2015) 39278-39284. A. M. Badawi, S. S. Abd El Rehim, W. M. Kamel, Corrosion

T

[32] M. A. Hegazy,

IP

inhibition of carbon steel using novel N-(2-(2-mercaptoacetoxy) ethyl) - N, N-

SC R

dimethyl dodecan-1- aminium bromide during acid pickling. Corros. Sci. 69 (2013) 110–122.

NU

[33] R. A. Antunes, M.C.L. de Oliveira, M.F. Pillis, Effect of the deposition temperature on the corrosion stability of TiO2 films prepared by metal organic chemical vapor

MA

deposition, Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 8 (2013) 1487– 1500. [34] J. O. Iroh, W. Su, Corrosion performance of polypyrrole coating applied to low carbon

D

steel by an electrochemical process, Electrochim. Acta 46 (2000) 15– 24.

TE

[35] F. Mansfeld, M.W. Kenedig, S. Tsai, Evaluation of corrosion behavior of coated

CE P

metals with AC impedance measurements, Corrosion 38 (1982) 478–485. [36] D. A. Lopez, N.C. Rosero-Navarro, J. Ballarre, A. Duran, M. Aparicio, S. Cere, Multilayer silica-methacrylate hybrid coatings prepared by sol–gel on stainless steel

AC

316 L: electrochemical evaluation, Surf. Coat. Technol. 202 (2008) 2194–2201. [37] K. Miyazawa, K. Suzuki, and M.Y. Wey, Microstructure and oxidation-resistant property of solgel derived ZrO2-YO2 films prepared on austenitic stainless steel substrates. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 78 (1995) 347-355. [38] D. Yu, J. Tian, J. Dai, X. Wang, Corrosion resistance of three-layer super hydrophobic composite coating on carbon steel in seawater, Electrochimica Acta 97 (2013) 409– 419. [39] J. W. Chang, C.H. Chang, W.P. Chih, W.C. Shao, M.Y. Jui, L.H. Ching, W. Yen, Advanced anticorrosive coatings prepared from the mimicked xanthosoma

23

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT sagittifolium-leaf-like electroactive epoxy with synergistic effects of superhydrophobicity and redox catalytic capability, Chem. Mater. 23 (2011) 2075-3083. [40] P. Wang, D. Zhang, R. Qiu, Liquid/solid contact mode of super-hydrophobic film in

T

aqueous solution and its effect on corrosion resistance, Corros. Sci. 54 (2012) 77-84.

IP

[41] L. Ćurković, H. O. Ćurković, S. Salopek, M. M. Renjo, S. Šegota, Enhancement of

SC R

corrosion protection of AISI 304 stainless steel by nanostructured sol–gel TiO2 films, Corros. Sci. 77 (2013) 176–184.

NU

[42] R. Tremont, H. De Jesus-Cardona, J. Garcia-Orozco, R.J. Castro, C.R. Cabrera, 3Mercaptopropyltrimethoxysilane as a Cu corrosion inhibitor in KCl solution, J. Appl.

MA

Electrochem. 30 (2000) 737-743.

[43] J. W. Schultze, K. Wippermann, inhibition of electrode processes on copper by AHT

D

in acid solutions, Electrochim. Acta 32 (1987) 823-831.

TE

[44] H. Cheraghi, M. Shahmiri, Z. Sadeghian, Corrosion behavior of TiO2–NiO

CE P

nanocomposite thin films on AISI 316L stainless steel prepared by sol–gel method, Thin Solid Films 522 (2012) 289–296. [45] Y. Wang, Z. Jiang, Z. Yao, Formation of titania composite coatings on carbon steel by

AC

plasma electrolytic oxidation, Appl. Surf. Sci. 256 (2010) 5818–5823. [46] M. H. Razali, M. N. Ahmad-Fauzi, A. R. Mohamed, S. Sreekantan, Morphological, Structural and Optical Properties Study of Transition Metal Ions Doped TiO2 Nanotubes Prepared by Hydrothermal Method, Int. J. Mater. Mech. Manuf. l (2013) 314–318.

24

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT LIST OF TABLE

No.

T

Lattice parameters and average crystallite size of ZrO2-TiO2 samples

IP

TABLE 1

Caption

TABLE 2

SC R

EIS fitting parameters for blank and coated C1018 carbon steel in 1.0 M HCl at 50 ºC: 5%ZT film (obtained from sol 5% ZrO2-TiO2), 10%ZT film (obtained from sol 10% ZrO2-TiO2) and 20%ZT film (obtained from sol 20% ZrO2-TiO2).

NU

Corrosion parameters determined from potentiodynamic measurements for coating and uncoating C1018 carbon steel in 1.0 M HCl. 5%ZT (obtained from sol 5% ZrO2TABLE 3

MA

TiO2), 10%ZT film (obtained from sol 10% ZrO2-TiO2) and 20%ZT film (obtained

AC

CE P

TE

D

from sol 20% ZrO2-TiO2).

25

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Table 1:

Lattice parameters/ Å Samples

Crystallite size/ nm

c

TiO2

3.802

9.471

5% Zr-TiO2

3.789

9.503

10% Zr-TiO2

3.798

8.981

10

20% Zr-TiO2

3.806

9.133

12.3

AC

CE P

TE

D

MA

NU

SC R

IP

T

a=b

26

19.7 15.8

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

IP

T

Table 2:

Ccoat/

Rct/

Cdl/

Ω cm2

μF cm-2

Ω cm2

μF cm-2

Blank

--

--

26.8

5%ZT1

208.

.8.9

182

5%ZT2

2.87

2892

301

5%ZT3

9.8.

08.9

10%ZT1

.082

282.

10%ZT2

.28.

10%ZT3

2..82

20%ZT1 20%ZT2

τ/ s

P%

0823510

--

87.4

08...

0802.72

..8.

52.9

08722

0802.7.

7280

775

20.5

087..

0802..7

7.8.

354

44.9

087.9

0802..7

7.89

08..

1084

14.6

0879.

0802...

798.

0827

2153

7.3

087.9

0802.9.

7.89

2.8.

289.

295

53.9

08707

0802.7

7087

9.89

0897

855

18.6

087..

0802.7

7.8.

..8.

08.9

1209

13.1

08799

0802..9

7989

CE P

D

MA

NU

--

TE

θ

594

AC

20%ZT3

SC R

Rpore/

Sample

27

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Table 3:

βa/

Ecorr/

P%

135

---

110

..8.

106

..87

77

100

798.

66

95

708.

63

97

7.8.

-535

60

93

7.89

-500

75

105

..8.

0.095

-507

71

102

7989

0.081

-522

73

98

7.8.

-2

mAcm

mV vs. SCE

Blank

1.702

-484

5%ZT1

0.303

-493

5%ZT2

0.189

-506

5%ZT3

0.936

-530

10%ZT1

0.165

-501

10%ZT2

0.082

10%ZT3

0.056

20%ZT1

0.199

mV dec

-1

mV dec -1

SC R

95 81

MA

NU

79

D

-508

TE

AC

20%ZT3

CE P

20%ZT2

-βc/

T

Jcorr/

IP

Sample

28

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT LIST OF FIGURE

No.

T

Schematic of preparation for ZrO2-TiO2 films

IP

Figure 1

Caption

XRD patterns of sol–gel synthesized nanocomposites calcined at 550 °C: (a) TiO2,

SC R

Figure 2

(b) 5% ZrO2-TiO2, (c) 10% ZrO2-TiO2, and (d) 20% ZrO2-TiO2. TEM micrographs of powdered 5% ZrO2-TiO2 (a, b), 10% ZrO2-TiO2 (c, d), and Figure 3

NU

20% ZrO2-TiO2 calcined at 550 °C at magnifications 50000x and 80000x

Figure 4

MA

SEM images of carbon steel samples: (a) carbon steel bare before coating at magnification 1000x, (b1, b2 and b3) carbon steel bare coated with deposited (5% ZrO2-TiO2) film one layer at magnifications 200x, 1000x and 2000x, respectively.

Figure 5

TE

D

SEM images of coated carbon steel samples with (10% ZrO2-TiO2) film: (a) one layer and (b) three layers coating at magnifications 1000x. Inset at magnifications

CE P

2000x.

EDAX analysis of uncoated and coated carbon steel samples: (a) uncoated sample (b) coated with 5% ZrO2-TiO2 film- one layer and (c) coated with 10% ZrO2-TiO2 film-

AC

Figure 6

one layer.

Variation of open-circuit potential with immersion time for carbon steel obtained in

Figure 7 1.0 M HCl with and without 10% ZrO2-TiO2 coated films. EIS plots for carbon steel bare and coated by 5% ZrO2-TiO2 film in 1.0 M HCl Figure 8

solution at 50 ºC and Ecorr exemplified as: (a) Nyquist and (b) bode modulus and (c) bode phase angle plots.

Figure 9

EIS plots for carbon steel bare and coated by 10% ZrO2-TiO2 film in 1.0 M HCl solution at 50 ºC and Ecorr exemplified as: (a) Nyquist and (b) bode modulus and (c) bode phase angle plots.

29

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Figure 10

EIS plots for carbon steel bare and coated by 20% ZrO2-TiO2 film in 1.0 M HCl solution at 50 ºC and Ecorr exemplified as: (a) Nyquist and (b) bode modulus and (c) bode phase angle plots. Equivalent circuit for carbon steel bare (a), equivalent circuit for substrate coated

T

Figure 11

IP

with films 1, 2 and 3 (b) and physical representation of the equivalent circuit model

Figure 12

SC R

(c).

Potentiodynamic polarization curves for carbon steel bare and coated by different

NU

layers of (a) 5% ZrO2-TiO2, (b) 10% ZrO2-TiO2 and (c) 20% ZrO2-TiO2 films in 1.0 M HCl at 50 ºC.

SEM micrographs of uncoated and coated carbon steel samples protection with 10%

MA

Figure 13

ZrO2-TiO2 film after immersion in 1.0 M HCl for 5 days at magnification x=2000 (a)

D

uncoated sample (b) coated with one layer, (c) coated with two layers and (d) coated

CE P

EDAX analysis of uncoated and coated carbon steel samples protection with 10% ZrO2-TiO2 film after immersion in 1.0 M HCl for 5 days (a) uncoated sample (b) coated with one layer, (c) coated with two layers and (d) coated with three layers.

AC

Figure 14

TE

with three layers. Inset the micrographs at magnification x =500.

30

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Figure 1

IP

T

Ti-(iOPr)4+ iPr-OH

SC R

xZrOCl2+bidistilled water

NU

Hydrolysis

Nitric acid

TE

D

MA

Chelating agent

AC

CE P

Transparent Sol Gelation

Gel Drying xZr-Ti(OH)4 Calcination x% ZrO2-TiO2

31

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

a TiO2 b 5% ZrO2-TiO2 c 10% ZrO2-TiO2 d 20% ZrO2-TiO2

1200

1000

NU

Anatase Rutile

MA

800

D

600

400

TE

a

200

CE P

b c d 10

20

AC

Intensity (a.u)

SC R

IP

T

Figure 2

30

40

2 / degree

32

50

60

70

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Figure 3

b)

NU

SC R

IP

T

a)

c)

f)

AC

e)

CE P

TE

D

MA

d)

33

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

T

Figure 4

AC

CE P

TE

D

MA

(b2)

(b1)

NU

SC R

IP

(a)

34

(b3)

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

SC R

IP

T

Figure 5

(a)

AC

CE P

TE

D

MA

NU

(b)

35

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Figure 6 Si 0.37

Ni 0.01

C 0.18

S 0.03

Cr 0.07

Mn 0.71

P 0.03

Fe 98.60

O 9.35

Si 0.20

Ti 7.32

(a)

V 0.1

Zr 0.46

Mn 0.71

P 0.03

Fe 81.83

AC

CE P

TE

D

MA

Element Mass, %

NU

SC R

IP

T

Element Mass, %

Element Mass, %

(b)

O 12.16

Si 0.16

Ti 8.72

V 0.03

S 0.03

Zr 0.69

Mn 0.43

P 0.03

Fe 77.78

(c)

36

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Figure 7

T

-460

IP

-470

SC R

-480

NU

-500 -510

MA

-520 -530 -540

C steel bare 10% ZT1 10% ZT2 10% ZT3

-560 -570 200

400

CE P

0

TE

D

-550

600

800

1000

Immersion Time/ s

AC

EO.C.P/ mV vs. SCE

-490

37

1200

1400

1600

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Figure 8

800

30 27

T

700

Blank C Steel 5% ZT1 5% ZT2 5% ZT3

Blank C Steel

24

IP

21 18

600

9 6

400

3 0 6

9

12

15

18

21

100

100

200

300

D

0 3.0

2.6

1.4 1.2

700

800

75

Blank C Steel 5% ZT 1 5% ZT 2 5% ZT 3

70 65 60

(c) (I) (II)

50

Phase /

0

45

AC

1.6

600

55

CE P

2.4

500 2

-ZRe/  . cm

TE

2.8

1.8

0.5 Hz

(a)

400

Blank C Steel 5% ZT 1 5% ZT 2 5% ZT 3

2.0

2.5 Hz

1.0 Hz

0

2.2

30

MA

200

2

27

10 Hz

100 kHz

log |Z| /. cm

24

300

NU

-ZIm /  . cm 2

12

500

SC R

15

40 35 30 25 20 15

1.0 10

0.8

(b)

5

0.6

0

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

log f / Hz

log f / Hz

38

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Figure 9

1600

30 27

1400

Blank C Steel 10% ZT1 10% ZT2 10% ZT3

Blank C Steel

24

1200

T

21 18

IP

15

9

SC R

-ZIm/  . cm

2

12

1000

6

800

3 0 6

9

12

15

18

600

21

24

27

30

2.5 Hz

100 kHz

NU

400

0.5 Hz

1.0 Hz

200

10 Hz 0

200

MA

0 400

600

800

1000

(a) 1200

1400

1600

2

-ZRe/  . cm 75

3.0

Blank C Steel 10% ZT1 10% ZT2 10% ZT3

2.4

1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.8

55

(b)

(II)

50

Phase /

CE P

2.0

(I)

60

45 40 35 30 25 20

AC

log |Z| /. cm

2

2.2

65

0

TE

2.6

(c)

Blank C Steel 10% ZT1 10% ZT2 10% ZT3

70

D

2.8

15 10 5 0

0.6 0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

0.0

4.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

log f / Hz

log f / Hz

39

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Figure 10

1100 30

Blank C Steel 20% ZT1 20% ZT2 20% ZT3

Blank C Steel

27

1000

T

24

900

21 18

IP

800 15

2

-Z Im/  . cm

9

600

6 3

500

0 6

9

12

15

18

21

24

27

30

400

NU

10 Hz

300 100 kHz

200

MA

100

0

100

200

300

400

500

D

Blank C Steel 20% ZT1 20% ZT2 20% ZT3

600

(a)

700

800

900

1000 1100

2

2.6 2.4

65

1.8

1.4 1.2 1.0

(I)

50 0

(II)

45 40 35 30

AC

1.6

60

Phase /

2.0

(c)

Blank C Steel 20% ZT1 20% ZT2 20% ZT3

55

CE P

2.2

75 70

TE

2.8

2

0.5 Hz

-ZRe/  . cm

3.0

log |Z| /. cm

2.5 Hz

1.0 Hz

0

25 20 15 10

0.8 0.6

SC R

12

700

(b)

5 0

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

log f / Hz

log f / Hz

40

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

T

Figure 11

IP

(a)

SC R

Cdl

Rs

NU

Rct

MA

(b)

Ccoat

Rs

TE

D

Rpore

CE P

Electrolyte

Cdl Rct

Coating

Metal surface

Coating capacitance

AC

Solution resistance

(c)

Rs

Double layer capacitance Pore resistance Charge transfer resistance

Pore

41

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Figure 12 -1 .0 -1 .5

T

-2 .5

IP

-3 .0 -3 .5 -4 .0

SC R

lo gI /A c m

-2

log J/ A cm-2

-2 .0

-4 .5

B lan k C S teel 5% ZT1 5% ZT2 5% ZT3

-5 .0 -5 .5

NU

(a ) -6 .0 -1 .0 -1 .5

MA

-2 .0

-3 .0

D

-3 .5 -4 .0 -4 .5

TE

-2

/A cAmcm-2 lo gI J/ log

-2 .5

-5 .0

-6 .0 -6 .5 -7 .0

B lan k C S teel 10% ZT1 10% ZT2 10% ZT3

(b )

AC

-7 .5 -1 .0

CE P

-5 .5

-1 .5 -2 .0

-2

lo gI /A c m

log J/ A cm-2

-2 .5 -3 .0 -3 .5 -4 .0 -4 .5 -5 .0 -5 .5

B la n k C S te e l 20% ZT1 20% ZT2 20% ZT3

-6 .0 -6 .5

(c )

-7 .0 -7 0 0

-6 5 0

-6 0 0

-5 5 0

-5 0 0

-4 5 0

E / m V v s. S C E

42

-4 0 0

-3 5 0

-3 0 0

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Figure 13

T

(b)

MA

NU

SC R

IP

(a)

AC

CE P

TE

D

(c)

43

(d)

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Figure 14

C 0.36

O 34.76

Cr 0.05

Na 0.03

Si 0.18

Cl 16.46

Mn 0.56

Fe 47.60

O 18.03

Cl 8.36

NU

C 0.89

MA

Element Mass, %

SC R

IP

T

Element Mass, %

Mn 0.50

(a)

Ti 1.45

Zr 0.40

Fe 70.37

(b)

TE

D

Zr

C 0.80

O 15.54

Na 0.03

Cl 6.07

Mn 0.51

Ti 1.81

Zr 0.46

Fe 74.78

AC

CE P

Element Mass, %

(c)

Element Mass, %

C 0.61

O 14.51

Cr 0.01

Na 0.02

Cl 5.86

Mn 0.51

Ti 0.96

Zr 0.31

Fe 77.21

(d)

44

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Graphical abstract

Corrosion resistance of ZrO2-TiO2 nanocomposite multilayer

IP

T

thin films coated on carbon steel in hydrochloric acid solution

SC R

Hany M. Abd El-Lateef*, Mai M. Khalaf

Chemistry Department, Faculty of Science, Sohag University, 82524 Sohag, Egypt E-mail address: [email protected] (Hany M. Abd El-Lateef)

Anatase Rutile

600

AC

a

CE P

800

TE

1000

D

a TiO2 b 5% ZrO2-TiO2 c 10% ZrO2-TiO2 d 20% ZrO2-TiO2

1200

Intensity (a.u)

MA

NU

[email protected] (Mai M. Khalaf)

400

b c

200

d 10

20

30

40

2 / degree

45

50

60

70

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Highlights Sol–gel TiO2 doped with ZrO2 films deposited on carbon steel substrate



XRD measurements of x wt % ZrO2-TiO2 showed the (101) peaks broader

SC R

IP

T



than that of TiO2

SEM results proved that, the cracking decreases with the number of layers



The prepared films can improve the corrosion resistance of the carbon steel

NU



substrate

10%ZrO2 loading is the optimal percent for useful effects on the corrosion

MA



AC

CE P

TE

D

resistance

46