Journal Pre-proof Coupled heat and mass transfer modelling in convective drying of biomass at particlelevel: Model validation with experimental data Gabriele A. Nagata, Thiago V. Costa, Maisa T.B. Perazzini, Hugo Perazzini PII:
S0960-1481(19)31621-0
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.10.123
Reference:
RENE 12492
To appear in:
Renewable Energy
Received Date: 15 May 2019 Revised Date:
20 October 2019
Accepted Date: 21 October 2019
Please cite this article as: Nagata GA, Costa TV, Perazzini MTB, Perazzini H, Coupled heat and mass transfer modelling in convective drying of biomass at particle-level: Model validation with experimental data, Renewable Energy (2019), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.10.123. This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. © 2019 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Experimental approach
60
Temperature, T [°C]
55 50 45 40 35
Experimental data (Tg = 55°C) Non-isothermal model (Tg = 55°C) Experimental data (Tg = 40°C) Non-isothermal model (T g = 40°C)
30
∂X ∂t
h
3 R X
25
T
ρc
X
T
0
dX ∆H dt c
D && 6Bi! ∙ #$ ! ' exp R
R!
,
λ+!
1 Bi .Bi
1/
0
$
D && ' exp R!
Acai-berry residue X X D
X X
&&
10
20
30
40
50
Time, t [min]
λ+! D &&t
∞
62 38+
λ!3 4λ!3
Bi! Bi .Bi
1/5
exp 6
Ea D exp , 0 R .T 273.15/
Theoretical approach
λ!3
D && $ ! t'7 R
λ!!D && t R!
,
λ!!
1 Bi .Bi
0.55
1/
01
Non-isothermal model (Tg = 55°C) Isothermal model (diffusive model) (Tg = 55°C) Non-isothermal model (Tg = 40°C) Isothermal model (diffusive model) (Tg = 40°C)
0.50
Moisture content, X [kg/kg]
dT dt
0.45 0.40 0.35 0.30 0.25 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.00 0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
Time, t [min]
3000
3500
4000
1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Coupled heat and mass transfer modelling in convective drying of biomass at particle-level: model validation with experimental data Gabriele A. Nagata, Thiago V. Costa, Maisa T. B. Perazzini and Hugo Perazzini* Institute of Natural Resources, Federal University of Itajubá, Itajubá – MG, Brazil, P.O. Box: 50, zip code: 37500-903. E-mail:
[email protected]*Corresponding Author
Abstract
10
Acai berry waste (13.40 mm diameter, 1250 kg·m−3 specific mass, 1850 J·kg−1·°C−1 specific heat
11
and 0.91 sphericity) is a large-scale agroindustrial by-product that can be used as source of biomass
12
for thermochemical conversion. As this material has high initial moisture content, prior thermal
13
treatment using drying is necessary. In this work, mathematical modelling of the single particle
14
drying kinetics of acai berry waste was performed. The experimental conditions were: temperature
15
of 42 ºC and 57 ºC and gas velocity of 1.8 m·s‒1. Non-isothermal model consisted of differential
16
equations based on macroscopic energy balance and on the differential form of the analytical
17
solution of the diffusive model. The estimated values of h were 47.78 W·m‒2·°C‒1 at 42 °C and
18
42.55 W·m‒2·°C‒1 at 57 °C and for D0 and Ea were 1.39×10‒4 m2·min‒1 and 26.88 kJ·mol‒1 at 42 °C,
19
respectively, and 2.94×10‒4 m2·min‒1 and 25.05 kJ·mol‒1 at 57 °C, respectively. The optimum value
20
of Bim was equal to 2.5. The results showed that the non-isothermal model gave good predictions
21
for both temperature and moisture content of the solid during drying. It was verified that there was
22
not a significative dependence of the moisture diffusion with the heating rate of the solid.
23
Keywords: bio-residue; effective diffusivity; heat transfer coefficient; moisture content; solid
24
waste; temperature.
25 26 27 28 29 30
2 31
1. Introduction
32
One of the greatest challenges in every urban center is to minimize the utilization of fossil
33
fuels in typical daily activities. Proposing the use of agroindustrial solid wastes as biomass in the
34
generation of renewable energy through its combustion and gasification, as well as in the
35
production of biofuels by pyrolysis processes, is a demanding task.
36
One of the most important properties of a given biomass is its moisture content [1,2]. High
37
levels of water concentration reduce the efficiency of the thermochemical conversion process due to
38
the reduction of both heating value of biomass [3] and conversion temperature [4]. In addition, high
39
moisture content in biomass increases the tendency of spontaneously combustion [5]. Drying can be
40
seen as an important biomass pre-thermal treatment, employed in order to minimize such problems,
41
but also to improve operation of the conversion process [6], to prevent organic matter loss due to
42
microbial and fungal activity [7], to improve energy quality and to minimize the emissions [4] and
43
to reduce the grinding energy consumption [8]. On the other hand, drying is seeing as one of the
44
most energy-intensive operation, consuming up to 50% more energy to evaporate water than the
45
latent heat [7]. Besides typical heat losses in the exhaust air and other inefficiencies of the drying
46
systems, additional thermal energy is required to break moisture bonds and release bound moisture
47
[9], which is a characteristic of biomass drying [7]. In turn, a drying process with high energy
48
efficiency and low energy consumption is essential for both the viability of the operation and the
49
reduction of operating costs. Keeping track of the process variables is a key step for an efficient
50
biomass drying. Final properties and quality of the dried product (fuel) in terms of the water content
51
must be assured during drying. For this sake, key variables such as moisture content and
52
temperature of the biomass have to be accurately monitored and predicted, which may be
53
accomplished by means of mathematical modelling and simulation studies.
54
There are several approaches presented in literature to model a given drying problem, such
55
as the characteristic drying rate curve (CDRC) [10], the drying kinetics models (empirical or semi-
56
empirical, frequently known as thin-layer drying equations) [11] and the distributed parameter
3 57
models, including coupled heat and mass transfer models [12]. Apart from the empirical or semi-
58
empirical drying kinetics models used to simply correlate the moisture content over time in drying
59
of a given biomass or solid waste in a greenhouse dryer [13], forced convection solar dryer [14],
60
solar tunnel dryer [15], cabinet dryer [16] and vibro-fluidized bed dryer [5], as well as the CDRC
61
approach to predict drying kinetics data in solar dryer [17] and tray dryer [2], more rigorous models
62
derived from heat and mass conservation laws are also interesting, since they help in optimization
63
of the process in order to determine its viability regarding to economic benefits. Besides their
64
application in solar drying, distributed parameter models were applied with success in other drying
65
technologies, such as in conveyor-belt dryer [18], fluidized [19] and fixed bed dryer [20], and
66
vacuum oven dryer [21]. Those mathematical models are an essential tool to predict air temperature
67
and moisture evaporation rate to optimize operating conditions for an efficient use of drying
68
technologies [22].
69
Several works presented in literature that deals with coupled heat and mass transfer
70
modelling of biomass drying use the approach of thin-layer or deep bed drying. This preference can
71
be justified due to the high heterogeneous characteristics of a given biomass, which can be
72
constituted of different components in terms of geometry, shape and internal structure. However, if
73
the shape of the particle is known, the findings obtained in a very thin product layers, normally one
74
particle size, are interesting for the application at a deep bed scale, for equipment simulation and
75
design [23]. Furthermore, analysis of heat and mass transfer at particle-scale is a key point for
76
grasping drying behaviors in the granular wet material [24].
77
Acai berry waste is a large-scale agroindustrial by-product that can be used as source of
78
biomass for thermochemical conversion. Drying of this bio-waste is necessary in order to improve
79
the efficiency of the thermochemical conversion processes by increasing the combustion yield and
80
minimizes water vapor condensation, as it has an initial moisture content of about 40% (wet basis).
81
As drying of biomass is a complex and highly-cost process, performing mathematical modelling is
82
very important to warrant careful assessment of the operating conditions, which may contribute to
4 83
the improvement of the drying process and to the determination of the optimal operating conditions
84
to be used in industrial scale with low energy consumption.
85
This work presents a study about the mathematical modelling of the drying kinetics of acai
86
berry waste (fruit stone) under inlet air temperatures of 42 ºC and 57 ºC and velocity of 1.8 m·s−1,
87
once moderate drying conditions contribute to the minimization of the emissions of volatile organic
88
compounds to ambient air. High range of temperature employed is essential to deepen the
89
understanding of the coupling between heat and mass transfer established in a given drying problem
90
for different inlet air condition used. Such analysis contributes with valuable information regarding
91
to the formulation of energy and mass balance equations of the mathematical model, which in this
92
work consisted of a group of differential ordinary equations to model the heating and the drying
93
rate. To validate the proposed model, experiments were performed in a tunnel dryer at particle level,
94
once the results can be applied to the design and optimization of other drying systems at industrial
95
scale. It is expected that the conclusions drawn can contribute with reliable information regarding to
96
industrial implementation of thermal treatment of acai berry solid wastes by means of drying
97
technologies.
98 99
2. Mathematical modelling
100
It is well stated in literature the complexities involved in convective drying of a porous solid
101
regarding to transport phenomena. Simultaneous heat and mass transfer in a heterogeneous system
102
is a complex combination of different mechanisms of momentum, heat and mass transfer, such as
103
conduction thorough solid, liquid and gaseous phases, convection in the pores occupied by gas or
104
liquid and enthalpy transfer by evaporation and condensation cycles [25]. In the sense to describe
105
such fundamentals, several theories have been proposed by literature. Among them, two can be
106
highlighted: Luikov’s theory [26] and Whitaker’s theory [27].
107
Luikov’s theory is based on the irreversible thermodynamics principles and suggests that
108
drying is described in terms of pressure, temperature and moisture gradients. As a result, a group of
5 109
coupled partial differential equations is used to describe the phenomena established in drying. For a
110
system at constant pressure, simultaneous heat and moisture transfer in a rigid porous medium can
111
be described by the following equations in terms of effective transport parameters [28]: ∂X = ∇. D ∇X + ∇. D δ ∇T ∂t
(1)
∂T ∆H ϕ ∂X = ∇. α ∇T + ∂t c ∂t
(2)
112
An important aspect of this group of equations is the coupling between them, representing
113
the effects of the temperature gradient on the moisture transfer and of the moisture gradient and the
114
latent heat of evaporation on the heat diffusion.
115
Whitaker proposed a more detailed theory in which transport equations are described for
116
each phase (solid, liquid and gas) in macroscopic and microscopic levels based in the local average
117
volume behavior. Perré [29], in his work, presented a summary of the Whitaker’s theory. From
118
some simplifications, the author showed that the Whitaker’s theory can be described based on a
119
model with two dependent variables (moisture and temperature). The differential equations of
120
moisture and energy are shown according to Equations (3) and (4), respectively [29]. ρ
∂X = ∇. ρ ∂t
∇w +
∇ρ − ρ !" #
∂ ε ρ h + ε ρ h + ρ" h" + ε ρ h # ∂t = ∇. k ∇T + h ρ
∇w + h
∇ρ − h ρ !"
(3)
(4)
121
Equation (3) indicates that moisture migration is due to the contribution of different
122
mechanisms of mass transfer, namely vapor diffusion, bound water diffusion and mass convection.
123
Equation (4), described in terms of the enthalpies of each phase, indicates the contribution of a
124
temperature gradient, the moisture migration by diffusion and convection due to the mass flux.
125
In both presented theories, it is possible to note the necessity to consider the thermal energy
126
contribution in moisture migration, which makes the solution of the drying problem very difficult
127
due to the coupling between the transport parameters, sometimes of difficult estimation, and due to
6 128
the complex resolution of the partial differential equations due to their non-linear characteristic. All
129
these facts lead to the use of simple mathematical models, but based on a well-founded theory,
130
which are more attractive for engineering purposes [30,31], such as in developing equations for use
131
in energy analysis and optimization of drying processes. Thus, seeking for a simplification of the
132
presented theories, the main assumption is the one that considers the moisture transfer in vapor
133
phase through the stagnant air inside the pores of the solid material, i.e., the water vapor does not
134
flow as single component [32], and the other is the isothermal condition.
135
Initially assuming that the isothermal approach can be satisfied, it is not necessary to make
136
distinctions between moisture in liquid and vapor phases [29], as occurs in Whitaker’s theory
137
(
138
neglected, which leads to a simplification of Equations (1) and (3), as well as Equations (2) and (4)
139
are not important to describe the drying problem. As a result, a simple microscopic model with only
140
one dependent variable is necessary to fit drying kinetics data, considering the volume of a biomass
141
particle as the interest system to be modeled:
=
). The contribution of the temperature gradients in moisture transfer can also be
∂X = ∇. D ∇X ∂t
(5)
142
Equation (5) is known as Fick’s second law equation of diffusion, which combines the mass
143
conservation equation with Fick’s first law of diffusion, and written in terms of an effective
144
diffusive parameter (D ), which is expected to account the effects of both liquid and vapor
145
transport. Analytical solutions of Equation (5) can be found in the work of Crank [33], for different
146
boundary conditions. The main assumptions applied to Equation (5) for an isothermal approach are
147
the following [34-36]:
148
1. The temperature of the solid remains constant during drying;
149
2. The effective thermal conductivity of the solid is infinite;
150
3. The difference of the temperature between the material to be dried to that for the gas is
151 152
very small; 4. The internal resistance to heat conduction is very small, or
7 153
5. The heat transfer rate inside the material is higher than the moisture transfer.
154
If the isothermal condition is valid, all these assumptions can be considered for the
155
formulation of a macroscopic energy balance. In this approach, it is assumed that the energy
156
transfer between solid and fluid phases is governed by the external control and that the temperature
157
profiles inside the particle are considered flat. Thus, the variation of temperature with time is more
158
important than its variation in space. Taking the spherical particle as the control volume, the
159
temperature variation of the single particle during drying can be modeled as [37]: ρc
160 161
dT dX = ha T − T# − ρ *− + ∆H dt dt
(6)
The heat transfer coefficient, h, was calculated according to the correlation proposed by Whitaker for convection heat transfer around a sphere [38], presented in Equation (7). 3 4 hD μ 3/; 4 6 :,; = 2 + *0,4Re2 + 0,06Re2 + ∙ Pr < > k μ
(7)
162
Under the operating conditions studied in this work, Equation (7) gave the following values
163
for h: 47.78 W·m‒2·°C‒1, for T = 42 °C, and 42.55 W·m‒2·°C‒1 for T = 57 °C. The properties of the
164
humid air were obtained from the correlations proposed by Tsilingiris [39] evaluated at film
165
temperature, which was approximated as the average of the bulk air and particle temperatures, once
166
the temperature of the solid reached the inlet air temperature asymptote very fast. μ was evaluated
167
at the average temperature of the solid recorded during drying.
168 169
The latent heat of vaporization, ∆H , was obtained according to the following relationship, among several correlations previously tested [40]: 3/6
374.14 − T + 273.15 ∆H = 2500 A E 374.14
170 171
(8)
The specific heat of the solid, c , treated as a function of the average spatial moisture content, X, was determined according to the following fashion: c
=c
F
+ 4187 ∙ X
(9)
8 172
The average moisture content is defined as: X=
3 I H X ∙ r 4 dr R6 :
(10)
173
The mass balance over the particle volume, developed to obtain X as a function of the time
174
under the isothermal approach, considers the moisture gradient transport only by molecular
175
diffusion. Assuming constant solid properties, the effective moisture diffusivity independent of
176
moisture content and unidirectional water flux, the diffusive model (Equation 5) can be written as: ∂X D ∂ ∂X = 4 J
K ∂t r ∂r ∂r
177 178
(11)
Equation (11) is subjected to the following initial (Equation 12) and boundary conditions (Equations 13 and 14): X r, 0 = X: , t = 0, 0 ≤ r ≤ R ∂X 0, t M = 0, t > 0 ∂r NO:
− D
∂X R, t M = βSX R, t − X T U, t > 0 ∂r NOI
(12) (13)
(14)
179
The Robin-type boundary condition (Equation 14) was proposed in order to study the effect
180
of the external resistance to moisture transfer at the interface gas-solid, in which β is an apparent
181
mass transfer coefficient, on the assumption that the rate of moisture loss is directly proportional to
182
the excess moisture content above equilibrium [10]. This parameter can also be defined as a
183
partitional constant that links the water concentration difference to the vapor concentration
184
difference at the boundary [41-42]. Applying the initial and boundary conditions, Equation (11) can
185
be written in terms of the Biot number for mass transfer (BiX ) as [33]:
r ∞ sin ]λZ R_ X−X T 2R BiX D = Y 4 exp J−λ4Z < 4 t>K X: − X T r R Sλ + BiX BiX − 1 U sin λZ ZO3 Z
186
Substituting Equation (15) in Equation (10), it gives [43]:
(15)
9
X−X T Bi4X D = 6Y 4 4 exp J−λ4Z < 4 t>K X: − X T R λ Sλ + BiX BiX − 1 U ZO3 Z Z ∞
187 188 189
(16)
Besides the isothermal approach, Equation (16) is valid only for the following assumptions: isotropic material, negligible shrinkage and uniform initial moisture content. The eigenvalues, λ n , are obtained from the following transcendental equation: λZ ctg λZ + BiX − 1 = 0
(17)
190
In preliminary studies, it was verified that only the first two terms of the series provided
191
enough accuracy to predict average moisture content as a function of the time. Solving Equation
192
(16) for n > 2 did not improve the fitting, and the coefficient of determination remained unaltered.
193
Thus, Equation (16) could be simplified to: X = 6c
λ34 Sλ34
Bi4X
+ BiX BiX − 1 U +
exp <−λ34
D t> R4
Bi4X
λ44 Sλ44 + BiX
D exp <−λ44 4 t>d X: − X T # + X R BiX − 1 U
(18) T
194
In order to develop the coupled heat and mass transfer model and to analyze the influence of
195
the heat transfer on moisture transport by diffusion, Equation (18) is derived with respect to time to
196
obtain the drying rate: ∂X = − X: − X T #6Bi4X ∂t
D λ34 D t 1 ∙ c< 4 > exp *− + A E R R4 λ34 + BiX BiX − 1
197
Considering that D
(19)
D λ44 D t 1 + < 4 > exp *− + A Ed 4 R R4 λ4 + BiX BiX − 1 depends only on temperature for the simultaneous heat and mass
198
transfer model [44], the effect of the heat transfer on the drying kinetics can be described according
199
to the Arrhenius relationship:
10
D By substitution of D
200
= D: exp A−
Ea E R T + 273.15
in Equation (19) by the definition presented in Equation (20), one can
201
obtain an expression for the drying rate with a new set of parameters:
202
fg fh
∙c
= − X: − X T #6Bi4X ∙ D: Ea λ34 t Ea 1 exp exp D: exp A− A− E *− E+ A 4 E 4 4 R R T + 273.15 R R T + 273.15 λ3 + BiX BiX − 1
D: Ea λ44 t Ea 1 + 4 exp A− E exp *− 4 D: exp A− E+ A 4 Ed R R T + 273.15 R R T + 273.15 λ4 + BiX BiX − 1 203
(20)
(21)
Taken a = 3/R for a spherical particle, Equation (6) can be rearranged to give [37]: 3 dT h ]R_ T − T# dX ∆H = +* + dt ρc dt c
(22)
204
Hence, the final set of differential equations of the coupled heat and mass transfer model
205
proposed is constituted by Equations (21) and (22). The values of BiX , D: and Ea were obtained in
206
preliminary study by fitting Equation (18) together with Equation (20) to experimental drying
207
kinetics data. For all the operating conditions tested, BiX was equal to 2.5, indicating that drying of
208
acai berry wastes is internally controlled by moisture diffusion. The values of D: and Ea were
209
1.39×10‒4 m2·min‒1 and 26.88 kJ·mol‒1 for Tg = 42 °C, respectively, and 2.94×10‒4 m2·min‒1 and
210
25.05 kJ·mol‒1 for Tg = 57 °C, respectively. As expected, the values of the activation energy are
211
very close. The values of λ3 and λ4 for BiX = 2.5 were 2.1746 and 5.0037, respectively, obtained in
212
the work of Carslaw and Jaeger [45]. By those parameter values, the system of differential
213
equations (Equations 21 and 22) was solved simultaneously in a Matlab environment using
214
ode23tb. The initial condition applied to solve Equation (21) was X = X: at t = t0. The initial
215
condition for Equation (22) was T = T0 at t = t0.
216 217
3. Material and methods
218
3.1. Biomass
11 219
The spherical-shape biomass studied in this work consisted of acai berry solid wastes
220
(sphericity greater than 0.9), which were collected from pulp extraction step of the processing plant
221
of acai berry fruit (Euterpe oleracea Mart.) localized in Brazil. The residue consisted mainly of the
222
kernel of the fruit, covered with a rough layer of fibers and some pulp residues, as shown in Figure
223
1. Small samples of the solid waste were packaged in polyethylene vessels, which were then kept in
224
a refrigerator at a temperature of about -6 °C. Prior to drying experiments, the samples were
225
withdrawn from the refrigerator and placed in a suspended sieve for 12 h at room temperature
226
(25 °C) to remove superficial water. This procedure gave initial moisture content with an average
227
value of 0.49 kg H2O ·kg−1 dry material. No pre-treatment was applied to the samples to perform the
228
drying experiments.
229
•
Figure 1
230
Individual particles of acai berry waste had an average diameter of 13.40 ± 0.8 mm, specific
231
mass of 1250 ± 11 kg·m−3 and specific heat (dry) of 1850 ± 125 J·kg−1·°C−1. The mean particle
232
diameter was determined with the aid of a digital caliper. The specific mass of the particles was
233
determined by liquid picnometry using water at temperature of 25 °C, while the specific heat of the
234
dry material was obtained by calorimetry using cold water at 4 °C and solids at temperature of
235
25 °C.
236
The thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) of the dried biomass in an environment of O2 is
237
shown in Figure 2. The heating rate was equal to 10 °C/min. The analysis shows that there is a
238
thermal resistance up to 200 °C. At higher temperatures, there is a significant and fast degradation
239
of the residue of about 50%. This suggests that for applications up to 200 °C, the residue can be
240
used for industrial purposes and indicates the stability of the material for drying up to this
241
temperature. Higher temperatures are also interesting for thermochemical conversion. Referring to
242
drying applications, inlet air temperature with a value of 200 °C is the maximum one to be
243
employed without significant thermal degradation of the material. However, even temperature
244
values below 200 °C must be employed with care, since a significant emission of pollutants
12 245
(volatile organic compounds) begin to appear at low temperature [46]. Even though acai residues
246
drying could be performed up to 200 °C without significant thermal degradation, use of low to
247
moderate temperature permits an efficient and environmentally friendly drying [46]. All physical and thermal properties of the solid waste presented were obtained from a
248 249 250
representative sample by the quartering method. •
Figure 2
251 252
3.2. Drying unit and experimental methodology
253
The experiments were performed in a laboratory-scale tunnel dryer, depicted in Figure 3,
254
which consisted of a drying tunnel 0.1 m of diameter and 1.2 m long, thermally isolated by glass
255
wool insulation and thermal conductivity of about 0.035 W·m−1·K−1, a fan, an air heater constituted
256
of a circular heating element connected to a PID controller, which kept the air temperature within
257
±0.5 °C of the set point. The monitoring of the air temperature inside the drying tunnel was
258
performed based on a temperature sensor, Pt-100, linked to the automatic temperature controller.
259
The relative humidity of the air was detected and monitored by a thermo-hygrometer (Politerm,
260
accuracy ±2.0% and resolution 0.01% and 0.01 °C), inserted in the middle position of the cross
261
section of the drying tunnel. The air velocity was measured by a thermo-anemometer (Highmed,
262
accuracy ±3.0% and resolution 0.01 m/s and 0.1 °C), placed in a point above the samples in order to
263
establish a well-defined velocity of the drying medium.
264
•
Figure 3
265
The experimental unit was developed in order to provide a convection environment with a
266
well-defined air flow direction and reliable data with the aid of both online temperature data-
267
logging data and a controlling system. Fixed bed dryers, like the tunnel dryer developed in this
268
work, are the simplest type of laboratory-scale dryer and commonly utilized in drying experiments
269
because of the greater surface area exposed to the air stream with moderate conditions, along with
270
its simplest conception and operation. In terms of the scientific point of view, this type of dryer is
13 271
very suitable for obtaining drying kinetics in laboratory-scale, since it is very simple to maintain
272
constant the operational conditions of the air, which allows obtaining reliable drying kinetics data
273
that are the basis for energy, modeling, optimization and scale-up studies. Moreover, it is
274
appropriate for particle-level drying. In this drying unit, the samples were subjected to a single-
275
phase air flow under specific conditions of velocity and temperature. As the particle-level
276
experiments were employed in this work, particles of acai berry wastes were inserted in a metallic
277
wire, which was fixed in an insulation block made of polystyrene foam-like material 0.001 m of
278
thick with thermal conductivity of about 0.025 W·m−1·K−1 (Figure 3). This system was inserted
279
1.0 m from the fan, inside the drying tunnel, and it was easily removed for periodic weighting of the
280
sample.
281
The experimental methodology used to obtain drying kinetics data was based on the
282
gravimetric method, which is a standard technique for the absolute determination of moisture of the
283
sample in a laboratory-scale [10]. Initially, the drying unit was adjusted to the desired operational
284
condition of velocity and temperature of the air. The drying unit took approximately twenty minutes
285
to achieve the thermal equilibrium. In such condition, the system constituted of the sample, the wire
286
and the insulated block, was inserted into the tunnel to start the drying kinetics experiments, in
287
which the sample of initially known mass was submitted to the drying process and weighed in pre-
288
established time intervals on an analytical scale (Marte, accuracy ±0.0001 g, resolution 0.0001 g
289
and maximum capacity 2 kg). This procedure, in which was assumed constant dry matter in the
290
system, was repeated until there was no significant mass variation of the sample, indicating that the
291
“practical equilibrium” was attained. Each weighting took about 12 seconds. The initial and final
292
sample weights were about from 3 to 4 g and from 2.1 to 2.8 g, respectively. The dry mass was
293
obtained by keeping the sample in an oven at 105±3 °C for 24 hours. After this period, the sample
294
was kept for 30 minutes in a desiccator to allow it to equilibrate with room temperature, and then
295
took to the analytical scale. This procedure allowed obtaining the drying kinetics of the acai solid
14 296
waste. From the observed values of sample mass with time, the average moisture content in dry
297
basis could be determined by the following fashion, according to the gravimetric method: i= X
m m: − mF J1 + < >K − 1 m: mF
(23)
298
To obtain the temperature of the solid as a function of the time, the same experimental
299
procedure was used to attain the thermal equilibrium of the drying system for the desired operating
300
condition. After this period, the thermocouple was inserted in the center of the particle and then the
301
acquisition system was initiated to take the initial temperature of the sample, rapidly placed into the
302
drying tunnel. The temperature was recorded at every 30 seconds. The data acquisition was stopped
303
when the temperature of the solid remained constant. The temperature of the samples during the
304
experiments was measured separately from the weight measurements, but in the same drying
305
conditions. A pre-calibrated K-type thermocouple (Chromel-alumel, 1.61 mm of diameter, ± 0.5 °C
306
of accuracy) was inserted at the center of the particle to measure its temperature along the time. The
307
thermocouple was connected to the data acquisition system, which consisted of a temperature data
308
logger (Akso, AK176) linked to a computer, where the observed data were recorded. The
309
temperature of the sample was recorded at every 30 seconds. Software Akso Data Logger Linker,
310
version 1.0, was used to save experimental data into a computer text file and then imported into a
311
software package like spreadsheet editors.
312
A total of eight experiments were carried out, in which particles of acai berry waste were
313
dried in the tunnel dryer at dry bulb temperatures of 42 °C and 57 °C and wet bulb temperatures of
314
24 °C and 31 °C, respectively. Low-temperature drying holds a large potential for biomass drying,
315
as it is possible to minimize the emissions of volatile organic compounds to ambient air [46]. The
316
range of the inlet temperature of the gas was chosen in order to analyze the effect of this variable in
317
in the heating rate of the solids, taking in account the experimental deviations. Such wide range is
318
interesting when analyzing the coupling between heat and mass transfer and the approach to the
319
isothermal condition.
15 320
The employed air velocity for those drying conditions was equal to 1.8 m·s−1, which is in the
321
practical range of tunnel dryers reported in literature. In the drying tunnel, this velocity value gave
322
an average air mass flux of 2.13 kg·s−1·m−2. All the operational conditions tested were chosen
323
according to the limitations of the equipment and because such conditions allow the analysis of
324
external and internal controlling mechanisms.
325
The total drying time ranged from 2000 (57 °C) up to 3900 minutes (42 °C). The initial
326
temperature of the samples was about 28 °C and depended on the room temperature, as well as the
327
relative humidity of the ambient air, which depended on the laboratory conditions. Each experiment
328
was repeated once to estimate the experimental errors associated with moisture and temperature
329
measurements. The average standard deviation and variance for moisture content were equal to
330
0.0827 g−1 water·g−1dry material and 6.84×10−3 g−1 water·g−1dry materia and for temperature were
331
1.0792 °C and 1.1647 °C, respectively. The uncertainties of the temperature measurements can be
332
attributed to the complex flow pattern across the single particle. On the other hand, the diameter of
333
the thermocouple is smaller than that of the particle, diminishing the experimental errors associated
334
with temperature measures. Referring to the experimental errors of the gravimetric method, it is not
335
always possible to obtain representative measures at the end of the drying, where the experimental
336
error increases due to the low moisture content and small size of the samples.
337
The drying methodology employed in this work was chosen because the conclusions
338
obtained at particle level can be applicable to understand the drying behavior of a thin-layer of an
339
industrial dryer (known as deep bed), which is divided into several layers of very small thickness.
340
The tunnel dryer in laboratory scale can be considered an “ideal” one, as the results obtained may
341
serve to comprehend other drying technologies at industrial scale, such as rotary dryer, solar dryer,
342
fluidized bed dryer, among others. Furthermore, the isolated particle method permits the analysis in
343
a simple way of the intrinsic behavior of the drying kinetics. This is difficult to attain in some
344
systems where a layer of particles is subjected to a perpendicular air flow that is affected by the
345
porosity distribution, which is a function of the shape and size of the particles. With respect to the
16 346
mathematical modelling, the heat transfer coefficients can be estimated in a more reliable way
347
through the empirical correlations for an isolated sphere. The main limitation of the single particle
348
drying kinetics is the accuracy in the determination of the sample mass, mainly at the end of the
349
experiments, where the experimental error increases when the moisture content of the particle is
350
close to the dynamic equilibrium condition.
351 352
4. Results and discussions
353
The coupled mass and energy transfer model (non-isothermal) represented by Equations (21)
354
and (22) gave adequate predictions for the observed values of temperature and moisture content of
355
the solid as a function of the time, as shown by Figures 4 and 5, mainly for the highest value of the
356
temperature of the drying medium studied. For the lowest value of the inlet air temperature, as
357
shown in Figure 5, predicted values of moisture content somewhat overestimates observed ones at
358
the middle-end period of drying, but the dynamic equilibrium predicted by the model is close to the
359
practical equilibrium determined experimentally. These results indicate that the proposed model can
360
be utilized as an alternative for parameters estimation in this condition, if an optimization method is
361
applied, and that it is suitable for simulation of operational conditions not studied in this work. To
362
some extent, the prediction error could be attributed to the estimated properties that depend on the
363
internal structure, moisture content and the nature of the solid, such as effective transport
364
parameters.
365
•
Figure 4
366
•
Figure 5
367
As presented in Figure 4, increasing the inlet temperature of the gas led to higher heating
368
rates. The fast increasing of the temperature of the particle with time until the stationary state being
369
reached was satisfactory predicted by the mathematical model proposed in this work, indicating an
370
intense heat exchange between solid and gas phases across the boundary layer. This is in
371
accordance with the results shown in Figure 5, as the drying rate was also influenced by the inlet
17 372
temperature of the gas. As more thermal energy is supplied to the system, lower is the total drying
373
time, which may lead to less energy consumption. According to Barati and Esfahani [47], higher
374
initial condition is associated with lower energy needed to increase the temperature, leading to less
375
energy consumption due to experiencing less temperature variation. In drying of biomass, the goal
376
is to use the lower amount of energy possible for a higher moisture evaporation rate for the required
377
final properties of the dried fuel in terms of water content. It is also important to point out that
378
neither the temperature curves nor the moisture content ones denoted the presence of the critical
379
temperature period or the constant drying rate period, indicating that the drying of acai berry wastes
380
is limited by the moisture migration inside the particle. These results are in accordance with
381
Equation (19), which is based on the mass transfer by diffusion.
382
The rapid approach of the particle temperature to the drying air asymptote, as presented in
383
Figure 4, is an indicative that the flat temperature profile inside the particle can be considered [23].
384
Besides, the fact that the time to reach the stationary condition for the heat transfer is lower than
385
that for moisture removal reinforces that assumption. In the view of temperature history of crop
386
materials during drying, the fast approach to the stationary state was also observed in convective
387
drying of maize kernels [48]. According to these discussions, the isothermal approach initially
388
applied to mathematical modeling of convective drying of acai berry solid waste is a valid
389
simplification, which is mainly strengthened by the good prediction of the macroscopic energy
390
balance. In other words, this means that the thermal energy supplied to the dryer is balanced by the
391
latent heat of vaporization of water. The analysis of the isothermal condition is important to be
392
checked, since the main underlying problem in convective dryers is the need to supply the latent
393
heat of evaporation to ensure the maximum energy efficiency possible [49]. Another statement that
394
can be made is that a microscopic energy balance is not necessary to describe the drying behavior.
395
Referring to the coupling between heat and mass transfer in drying, it has been stated by the
396
theories previously presented that in drying of capillary-porous materials there are significative
397
temperature gradients in the material and the coupling effect of these gradients, together with
18 398
moisture evaporation, influences the drying kinetics [25-27]. According to these theories, if the
399
coupling effect is not taken into account, the exclusion of this effect potentially contributed in a
400
large part of the error of the models. Hence, if the complexity of the drying problem arises,
401
Equations (1) and (2) or (3) and (4) are necessary to describe the drying behavior. However, as a
402
simple model is more attractive, like those presented in Equations (21) and (22), it is necessary to
403
investigate in what extent is the coupling between heat and mass transfer. This may be
404
accomplished, as suggested by Gely and Giner [50], by comparing predicted data of moisture
405
content as a function of the time by the isothermal model (Equation 18) and by the non-isothermal
406
model (Equation 21), taking the influence of the instantaneous solid temperature on drying kinetics
407
by Equation (20). Such comparison is presented in Figure 6.
408
•
Figure 6
409
It is possible to note that the drying curves predicted by the non-isothermal is similar to
410
those predicted by the analytical solution of the diffusive model for the isothermal drying
411
assumption. The small difference between predicted data by both models suggests the approach to
412
the isothermal condition, as the resistance to heat transfer does not play a significative hole in
413
drying of acai berry solid wastes.
414
According to the results presented in Figure 6, the analytical solution of the diffusive model
415
can be solely used to properly describe the drying kinetics of the problem studied in this work. As it
416
is possible to verify in Table 1, the analysis of variance (ANOVA), performed with Microsoft
417
Excel (Microsoft Office Professional Plus 2019), shows that the difference between predicted
418
curves is not significative for a confidence interval of 95%, since p > 0.05 and F < Fcritical. Tukey’s
419
statistical test, performed with software Past (Hammer and Harper, version 2.17c, 2013), revealed
420
non-significant differences between the curves presented in Figure 6 at a confidence level of 95%.
421
•
Table 1
422
Few studies presented by literature use the derived equation of the analytical solution of the
423
diffusive model considering the Robin-type boundary condition at the surface of the particle to
19 424
predict drying kinetics data and relating the simulation results with the analysis of the isothermal
425
condition approach in drying, along with a non-isothermal model. The methodology of analysis
426
proposed is the main contribution of this work along with the analysis of the mathematical
427
modelling of drying kinetics at particle scale. However, the discussions drawn considered only a
428
spherical particle and uniform temperature distribution inside the solid material, as the heat transfer
429
was governed by external control. Thus, for larger particles of agricultural residues, the isothermal
430
condition must be analyzed with care as internal temperature gradients may play a key hole in
431
drying process. On the other hand, the methodology proposed can be also extended to other fruit
432
stones and kernels of crop products with size similar to acai berry wastes, such as jambolão (3.11
433
mm Sauter diameter) [51], almonds (12.87 mm geometric mean diameter) [52], jatropha (11.57 mm
434
geometric mean diameter) [53], olive stone (3 mm average diameter) [54] and apricots (9.138 mm
435
geometric mean diameter) [55].
436 437 438
5. Conclusions •
From the characterization experiments, it was obtained the following thermophysical
439
properties of acai berry waste (fruit stone): diameter of 13.40 mm, specific mass of
440
1250 kg·m−3, specific heat of 1850 J·kg−1·°C− and sphericity of 0.91;
441
•
The non-isothermal model provided accurate predicted data, despite previous studies
442
presented in literature that proposed more complex models to describe drying
443
behavior of particulate materials in terms of the coupling between heat and mass
444
transfer phenomena;
445
•
Statistical analysis and simulation results showed that there was not a significant
446
difference between the drying curves predicted by both non-isothermal and
447
isothermal (analytical solution of the diffusive model) models, which demonstrates
448
that a macroscopic energy balance is adequate to predict temperature history of the
449
solid as a function of the time, and that the analytical solution of the diffusive model
20 450
can be solely used to describe the drying kinetics of convective drying of acai berry
451
wastes;
452
•
Predicted results by both diffusive and non-isothermal models indicate that there is
453
not a strong coupling between heat and mass transfer, leading to the assumption of
454
the isothermal drying condition and moisture diffusion control;
455
•
The main transport parameters of the non-isothermal model were the heat transfer
456
coefficient, estimated from the empirical correlation of Whitaker for an isolated
457
sphere (47.78 W·m‒2·°C‒1, for T = 42 °C, and 42.55 W·m‒2·°C‒1 for T = 57 °C) and
458
the pre-exponential factor and activation energy (1.39×10‒4 m2·min‒1 and 26.88
459
kJ·mol‒1 for Tg = 42 °C, respectively, and 2.94×10‒4 m2·min‒1 and 25.05 kJ·mol‒1 for
460
Tg = 57 °C, respectively), estimated from the Arrhenius correlation, used to link heat
461
and mass balances from the effective moisture diffusivity. The optimum value of
462
mass transfer biot number was equal to 2.5, indicating that the moisture transfer by
463
diffusion controls the drying dynamics;
464
•
As the particle size of the biomass plays a key hole in coupling between heat and
465
mass transfer, and therefore it has an important impact in drying, the present study
466
can be also extended to other fruit stones with size similar or smaller than the acai
467
residues (Dp < 13 mm), such as jambolão, almonds, jatropha, olive stone and
468
apricots, in which the internal temperature gradients can be neglected.
469
•
The findings obtained in this work may be useful for optimization studies, which will
470
permit the balance between operation costs and the energy consumption of drying in
471
order to obtain the most suitable situation to be implemented in pre-thermal
472
treatment process of the biomass studied in this work.
473 474 475
21 476
Acknowledgement The authors express their gratitude to Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas
477 478
Gerais (FAPEMIG), Brasil, for funding provided to Project APQ-03095-18.
479 480
Nomenclature av Bim cps cpds D0 Deff Dp Ea h hb hs hv hw keff kg m m0 md Pr r R ReD Rg t T Tg T0 !" w X Xk X0 Xeq β λ δ ∆H
Specific particle surface Biot number for mass transfer Specific heat of the solid Specific heat of the dry solid Pre-exponential factor of the Arrhenius relationship Diffusivity tensor of bound water Effective moisture diffusivity Particle diameter Diffusivity tensor of water vapor Activation energy Dimensionless diffusivity tensor Heat transfer coefficient Enthalpy of bound water Enthalpy of solid phase Enthalpy of water vapor Enthalpy of liquid phase Effective thermal conductivity Thermal conductivity of the gas Mass of the solid at time t Initial mass of the solid at time t = 0 Mass of dry solid Prandtl number Radial coordinate Radius of the particle Reynolds number Ideal gas constant Time Temperature Temperature of the gas Initial temperature of the solid at time t = 0 Velocity of the liquid phase Vapor mass fraction Moisture content at time t Moisture content at time t (average) Initial moisture content at time t = 0 Equilibrium moisture content
m²/m³ J/kg·°C J/kg·°C m²/min m²/min m²/min m m²/min J/mol W/m²·°C J/kg J/kg J/kg J/kg W/m·°C W/m·°C kg kg kg m J/mol·K min °C °C °C m/min kg/kg kg/kg kg/kg kg/kg
Greek symbols Apparent coefficient of mass transfer Roots of the transcendental equation Thermogradient coefficient Latent heat of evaporation
m/min kg/°C J/kg
22
ε ε ε µ µs ρg ρs ρv ρw ϕ
Gas volume fraction Solid volume fraction Liquid volume fraction Gas viscosity Gas viscosity evaluated at the surface temperature Specific mass of the gas phase Specific mass of the solid phase Specific mass of the water vapor Specific mass of the liquid phase Phase conversion factor
kg/m·s kg/m·s kg/m³ kg/m³ kg/m³ kg/m³ -
481
References
482 483
[1] A. Belghit, A. Bennis, Experimental analysis of the drying kinetics of cork, Energy Conversion and Management 50 (2009) 618–625.
484 485
[2] R.O. Madaleno, L.M. Castro, M.N. Coelho Pinheiro, Drying kinetics of granulated cork: Effect of air drying stream conditions and granule size, Biomass and Bioenergy 107 (2017) 8–19.
486 487
[3] A. Alamia, H. Ström, H. Thunman, Design of an integrated dryer and conveyor belt for woody biofuels, Biomass and Bioenergy 77 (2015) 92–109.
488 489 490
[4] M. Verma, C. Loha, A.N. Sinha, P.K. Chatterjee, Drying of biomass for utilising in co-firing with coal and its impact on environment – A review, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 71 (2017) 732–741.
491 492 493
[5] P. Zhao, L. Zhong, R. Zhu, Y. Zhao, Z. Luo, X. Yang, Drying characteristics and kinetics of Shengli lignite using different drying methods, Energy Conversion and Management 120 (2016) 330–337.
494 495 496
[6] M. Mosheni, A. Kolomijtschuk, B. Peters, Biomass drying in a vibrating fluidized bed dryer with a Lagrangian-Eulerian approach, International Journal of Thermal Sciences 138 (2019) 219– 234.
497 498 499
[7] G. Haarlemmer, Simulation study of improved biomass drying efficiency for biomass gasification plants by integration of the water gas shift section in the drying process, Biomass and Bioenergy 81 (2015) 129–136.
500 501
[8] O. Williams, E. Lester, S. Kingman, D. Giddings, S. Lormor, C. Eastwick, Benefits of dry comminution of biomass pellets in a knife mill, Biosystems Engineering 160 (2017) 42–54.
502 503
[9] I.C. Kemp, Fundamentals of energy analysis of dryers, in: E.Tsotsas, A.S. Mujumdar (Eds.), Modern Drying Technology: Energy Savings, Volume 4, Willey-VCH: Weinheim, 2014, pp. 1–45.
504
[10] R.B. Keey, Drying of Loose and Particulate Materials, first ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1992.
505 506
[11] S. Pusat, M.T. Akkoyunlu, H.H. Erdem, A. Dagdas, Drying kinetics of coarse lignite particles in a fixed bed, Fuel Processing Technology 130 (2015) 208–213.
507 508
[12] X.D. Chen, A. Putranto, Modeling Drying Processes: A Reaction Engineering Approach, first ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2013.
509 510 511
[13] I. Hamdi, S. Kooli, A. Elkhadraoui, Z. Azaizia, F. Abdelhamid, A. Guizani, Experimental study and numerical modeling for drying grapes under solar greenhouse, Renewable Energy 127 (2018) 936–946.
512 513 514
[14] S. Mghazli, M. Ouhammou, N. Hidar, L. Lahnine, A. Idlimam, M. Mahrouz, Drying characteristics and kinetics solar drying of Moroccan rosemary leaves, Renewable Energy 108 (2017) 303–310.
23 515 516
[15] E.A. Mewa, M.W. Okoth, C.N. Kunyanga, M.N. Rugiri, Experimental evaluation of beef drying kinetics in a solar tunnel dryer, Renewable Energy 139 (2019) 235–241.
517 518 519
[16] M. Cuevas, M.L. Martínez-Cartas, L. Pérez-Villarejo, L. Hernández, J.F. García-Matín, S. Sánchez, Drying kinetics and effective water diffusivities in olive stone and olive-tree pruning, Renewable Energy 132 (2019) 911–920.
520 521 522
[17] A. Koukouch, A. Idlimam, M. Asbik, B. Sarh, B. Izrar, A. Bah, O. Ansari, Thermophysical characterization and mathematical modeling of convective solar drying of raw olive pomace, Energy Conversion and Management 99 (2015) 221–230.
523 524
[18] S. Pang, Q. Xu, Drying of woody biomass for bioenergy using packed moving bed dryer: mathematical modeling and optimization, Drying Technology 28 (2010) 702–709.
525 526 527
[19] R.M. Torrez Irigoyen, S.A. Giner, Drying-toasting of presoaked soybean in fluidized bed. Modeling, validation and simulation of operational variants for reducing energy consumption, Journal of Food Engineering 171 (2016) 78–86.
528 529
[20] G.F.M.V. Souza, R.F. Miranda, F.S. Lobato, M.A.S. Barrozo, Simultaneous heat and mass transfer in a fixed bed dryer, Applied Thermal Engineering 90 (2015) 38–44.
530 531 532
[21] S.M. Demarchi, R. Martín Torrez Irigoyen, S.A. Giner, Vacuum drying of rosehip leathers: Modelling of coupled moisture content and temperature curves as a function of time with simultaneous time-varying ascorbic acid retention, Journal of Food Engineering 233 (2018) 9–16.
533 534
[22] P.S. Chauhan, A. Kumar, C. Nuntadusit, J. Banout, Thermal modeling and drying kinetics of bitter gourd flakes drying in modified greenhouse dryer, Renewable Energy 118 (2018) 799–813.
535 536
[23] C.A. Márquez, A. De Michelis, S.A. Giner, Drying kinetics of rose hip fruits (Rosa eglanteria L.), Journal of Food Engineering 77 (2006) 566–574.
537 538 539
[24] C. Gu, Z. Yuan, S. Sun, L. Guan, K. Wu, Simulation investigation of drying characteristics of wet filamentous biomass particles in a rotary kiln, Fuel Processing Technology 178 (2018) 344– 352.
540 541
[25] C. Strumillo, T. Kudra, Thermal processing of biomaterials, Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, New York, 1998.
542
[26] A.V. Luikov, Heat and Mass Transfer, first ed., Mir Publishers, Moscow, 1980.
543 544
[27] S. Whitaker, Simultaneous heat, mass and momentum transfer in porous media: A theory of drying, Advances in Heat Transfer 13 (1977) 119–203.
545 546
[28] M.G.G. Mazza, E.C. Biscaia Jr., G. Massarani, Study of drying of a porous medium using gamma-ray attenuation technique, Drying Technology 24 (2006) 259–267.
547 548
[29] P. Perré, The proper use of mass diffusion equations in drying modeling: introducing the drying intensity number, Drying Technology 33 (2015) 1949–1962.
549 550 551
[30] R.M. Torrez Irigoyen, S.A. Giner, Drying-toasting kinetics of presoaked soybean in fluidized bed. Experimental study and mathematical modelling with analytical solutions, Journal of Food Engineering 128 (2014) 31–39.
552 553
[31] H. Perazzini, F.B. Freire, J.T. Freire, The influence of vibrational acceleration on drying kinetics in vibro-fluidized bed, Chemical Engineering and Processing 118 (2017) 124–130.
554 555
[32] M. Farid, A unified approach to the heat and mass transfer in melting, solidification, frying and different drying processes, Chemical Engineering Science 56 (2001) 5419–5427.
556
[33] A. S. Crank, The mathematics of diffusion, second ed., Claredon Press, Oxford, 1975.
24 557 558 559
[34] J.S. Roberts, C.H. Tong, The development of an isothermal drying apparatus and the evaluation of the diffusion model on hygroscopic porous material, International Journal of Food Properties 6 (2003) 165–180.
560 561
[35] M.E. Katekawa, M.A. Silva, A review of drying models including shrinkage effects, Drying Technology 24 (2006) 5–20.
562 563 564
[36] X.D. Chen, Simultaneous heat and mass transfer, in: S. Sablani, S. Rahman, A. Datta, A.S. Mujumdar (Eds.), Handbook of Food and Bioprocess Modeling Techniques, CRC Press, Boca Ranton, 2006, pp. 179–233.
565 566 567
[37] R.D. Gili, R.M. Torrez Irigoyen, M.C. Penci, S.A. Giner, P.D. Ribotta, Wheat germ thermal treatment in fluidsed bed. Experimental study and mathematical modelling of the heat and mass transfer, Journal of Food Engineering 221 (2018) 11–19.
568 569
[38] J.R. Welty, G.L. Rorrer, D.G. Foster, Fundamentals of Momentum, Heat, and Mass Transfer, sixth ed., Wiley, New York, 2015.
570 571
[39] P.T. Tsilingiris, Thermophysical and transport properties of humid air at temperature range between 0 and 100°C, Energy Conversion and Management 49 (2008) 1098–1110.
572
[40] Z.B. Maroulis, G.D. Saravacos, Food Process Design, first ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2003.
573 574
[41] X.D. Chen, X.F. Peng, Modified Biot number in the context of air-drying of small moist porous objects, Drying Technology 23 (2005) 83–103.
575 576
[42] I.I. Ruiz-López, M.A. García-Alvarado, Analytical solution for food drying kinetics considering shrinkage and variable diffusivity, Journal of Food Engineering 79 (2007) 208–216.
577 578
[43] M. A. Cremasco, Fundamentals of mass transfer, third ed., Blucher, São Paulo, 2016. (in portuguese)
579 580 581
[44] J. Srikiatden, J.S. Roberts, Predicting moisture profiles in potato and carrot during convective hot air drying using isothermally measured effective diffusivity, Journal of Food Engineering 84 (2008) 516–525.
582 583
[45] H.S. Carslaw, J.C. Jaeger, Conduction of heat in solids, second ed., Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1959.
584 585 586
[46] K. Klavina, A. Zandeckis, C. Rochas, A. Zagorkis, Low temperature drying as a solution for sustainable use of biomass, Proceedings of the 17th Conference for Junior Researches “Science Future of Lithuania” (2014).
587 588
[47] E. Barati, J.A. Esfahani, Mathematical modeling of convective drying: Lumped temperature and spatially distributed moisture in slab, Energy 36 (2011) 2294–2301.
589 590
[48] M.P. Tolaba, P.E. Viollaz, C. Suárez, A mathematical model to predict the temperature of maize kernels during drying, Journal of Food Engineering 8 (1988) 1–16.
591 592
[49] I.C. Kemp, Drying models, myths and misconceptions, Chemical Engineering and Technology 34 (2011) 1057–1066.
593 594
[50] M.C. Gely, S.A. Giner, Diffusion coefficient relationships during drying of soya bean cultivars, Biosystems Engineering 96 (2007) 213–222.
595 596 597
[51] L.P. Mussi, A.O. Guimarães, K.S. Ferreira, N.R. Pereira, Spouted bed drying of jambolão (Syzygium cumini) residue: Drying kinetics and effect on the antioxidant activity, anthocyanins and nutrients contents, Food Science and Technology 61 (2015) 80–88.
598 599
[52] J. Yang, G. Bingol, Z. Pan, M.T. Brandl, T.H. McHugh, H. Wang, Infrared heating for dryingroasting and pasteurization of almonds, Journal of Food Engineering 101 (2010) 273–280.
25 600 601
[53] A.M. Mousa, N.S. Elkaoud, S.H. Dosoky, Physical, mechanical and aerodynamic properties of Jatropha seeds, Misr Journal of Agricultural Engineering 33 (2016) 1477–1496.
602 603
[54] F.J.G. Cruz, P.J. Casanova-Peláez, J.M. Palomar-Carnicero, Drying kinetics of olive stone: a valuable source of biomass obtained in the olive oil extraction, Energy 75 (2014) 146–152.
604 605
[55] H.Fathollahzadeh, H. Mobli, A. Jafari, S. Rafiee, A. Mohammadi, Some physical properties of tabarzeh apricot kernel. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition 7 (2008) 645–651.
606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614
Table Captions Table 1: Analysis of variance (ANOVA) for the predicted results of both isothermal and nonisothermal model. Figure Captions Figure 1: Particles of moist acai berry waste: (a) fruit stones and (b) fruit stone cut in half.
615 616
Figure 2: Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) curves showing the mass loss profile of acai berry wastes.
617
Figure 3: Schematic sketch of the drying unit.
618 619
Figure 4: Observed temperature data of the single particle as a function of the time predicted by the non-isothermal model.
620 621
Figure 5: Observed moisture content data as a function of the time predicted by the non-isothermal model.
622 623
Figure 6: Predicted data of moisture content as a function of the time by the isothermal (diffusive model) and the non-isothermal model (coupled heat and mass transfer).
624 625
Table 1: Analysis of variance (ANOVA) for the predicted results of both isothermal and non-isothermal model.
Tg [°C]
F
Fcritical
p-Value
42
0,0383
3,9361
0,8452
57
0,0111
3,9381
0,9160
(a)
(b)
•
Mathematical modelling considering the coupling between heat and mass transfer.
•
Comparison between observed and predicted data for different inlet air conditions.
•
Diffusive model can be solely used to predict experimental moisture content data.
•
The isothermal drying condition approach can help to study other biomass drying.
•
Estimated parameters values are in the range of biological materials drying.
Declaration of interests x The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. ☐The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: