Criteria for evaluating different aspects of effectiveness of landslide control structures (in Russian)

Criteria for evaluating different aspects of effectiveness of landslide control structures (in Russian)

n8A 79~zTz PZ~ ~Um~ZONS ( ~ RUSSL~) MOseOW: Strollzdat, 1978, ~SP 795179 ~ OF DISPOSAL TECHNOLOGY ON SLOPE STABILITY AT DISPOSAL OVER PREVIOUSLY ~ W...

109KB Sizes 8 Downloads 57 Views

n8A

79~zTz PZ~ ~Um~ZONS ( ~ RUSSL~) MOseOW: Strollzdat, 1978, ~SP

795179 ~ OF DISPOSAL TECHNOLOGY ON SLOPE STABILITY AT DISPOSAL OVER PREVIOUSLY ~ WAH~E ON DISPOSAL AREA ' S t ~ E ' - O~ENCAST M I ~ 'KOSOVO',

~A~VAC

795172 V~V~ICAL SHIFTIm OF UNDESREAMED PILES IN

s~m,.,m c ~

~s

(z, ~USSL~)

(~N ~ m ~ o ~ )

Obradovic, R; llic, D; Stamatovic, A Rud Glas, N2, 1978, Pll-16

Boiko, N V; Piven~ V G; Kt~Iriashov, V P Os~Ov F u ~ , VI0, 1977, P9-12

79518o PILE ~ 795173 U S l m T ~

~ )

PILES UNDER SPECIAL SOIL CON-

~IT~O.S (I~ ~USSIA~)

Gritsiuk, L V; Dmitm~k~ V V Avtomob Dcrogi, N6, JUne 1978, ~6-8

Arahakuni, D E; Stolanova, T I Transp Stroit, NT, July 1978, P22-23 795174 CALCUIATI~ SETTLEMENT AND ~ OF FOUNDATIONS CF BUILDINGS AND ~ s (IN RUSSIAN) Goldshtein, M N; Kuahne~, S G; ~evchenko, M I Kiev: B1~livelmik, 1977, 208P

795181 CRITERIA FOR EVALU~ING DIFFEEEI~ ASPECTS OF ~m'~'~:CT~SS OF LANDSLIDE COntROL ~ S

(ZN m~SSZ~U~) Khazin, V I; Bomdar~ E G; Gol1~b~ V P 0snov Fundam, VII, 1978, P90-93

Slopes 795175 ANALYSIS CY TKE VAJONT SLIDE - NEW APPROACH Chowdhury, R Rock Mech, Vll, NI, JUne 1978, P29"~8

This ! ~ l ~ r is eoDcerned w i t h the -"~ysis of the 1963 rock slide in Italy, which imvolved aPl~x 250 m~l!ion c u m of rock on the upstream side ~f t h e Va~on% dam. The a r ~ s i s s~,.,,~,ates the transformation of the slope from a condltiom of stability to one of li~t-equilibri~ a ~ failure in a step-by-step process. It is shown that the en~-mous velocities calculated on the basis of external observations of the slide can be explained by the new a~d~tical approach.

7 ~ z ~ PROPAGATION OF FAILURE SURFACES IN NATURAL SLOPES Chc~lh~y, R N J GeOl~S Res, V83, NBI2, i0 Dec 1978, P5983-5988

Hydraulic structures 795182 ~ A V I O U R OF A TRIAL BANK C O ~ TO FAILURE ON SOFT ALUJVIU~ OF THE RIVER THAMES Merslamd, ~ Powell, J J M Proc Intermatiomal Symposium on GeOte~hrdCel Aspects of Soft Clays, B a t c h , 5-6 1977, P~05-525. F ~ l B s ~ o k : Asian Institute of Technology, 1977

Influence of dynamic loads due to explosions or earthquakes 795183 SEISMIC ~EHAVIOUR OF GRAVITY RETAINI~ WALLS Richa~ds~ R; Elms~ D G J Geotech EDgng Div, ASCE, VI05, N~T4, April 1979, P~9-~64 I n order to use the quasi-sts~ic Momomo~-Okabe amalysis fer the prediction of earthquake d,V'natalc forces on a gravity retalmlmg wall, wall irertia effects mmst be imcluded. A design procedure is developed in which the desigmer first chooses an acceptable level of wall displacemer~. He t h e n ecmpates t h e d e s i g n w a l l height which will restrict displacement in an e a r ~ , , ~ to the predeter~dned level. Wall inertia effects are sho~n to be of the same arder as the d ~ c soll 1~ust, and to be sensitive to vertical acceleration amd to base and wall friction.

Uses a simple e ~ g y approach to analyse the propagation of failure surfaces of arbitary inclination within a natural slope, considerimg first the examples of a shear b ~ amd an infirdte slope • SURFACE MINE CONSTRUC79~177 REINFORCED EARTH ~ TION AUst Min, V79, N2, Feb 1979, P226-229 Reviews t h e prluciples ar~ practice of reinf ~ c e d e a r t h comstruction amd briefly mentions two pro~eets in Aus%ralian mines.

79~178 GEOLOGY AND SLOPE STABILITY IN THE GEYSERS G

~ RESOURCES AREA Bedrosaian, T L Callf Geol, V31, N7, July 1978, P151-159

Describes the g e o l o g i c se~ti~ ar~ discusses characteristics of stable terrain: cmmpetem~ formational u~Its, ridge tops, flat ~ o u r d , competent masses of rock in sheared r,.~_lamge matrix, maturally buttressed lamdslides. Conaiders charac~erlstice of u~ff,a~le terrain: lamdslides, e r o s i o n , sheared ~ matrix, h~ermmlly altered rock, unfavourably dipp i ~ b e d d ~ l~lanes, faults ~ shear zones, sheared serpemtimite, mines a ~ mine tailimgs, subsidezme, expansive soils. Other fact,s discussed include e ~ u a k e shakimg, surface and grour~ water, vegetation.

FOR LANDSLIDE lmEVE~ION (IN

7~i~

VERTICAL SOIL-STRbLVI~/RE INTERACTION ..~CTS Little, R R; Raftopoulos, D D Bull Saismol Soc Am, V69~ NI~ Feb 1979j P221236 An amalytical e~l~ession describimg the three~1,~nsionsl vertical soil-atruc~ure interaction effects is deweloped usimg Laplace and Hamkel transformation t e ~ q u e s . U%ilizi~ these tramsfc~m~ticm teakuiques and ~ m a l mode thecry of vibrations an N-mass structural model is coupled to an elastic ha1~-space rel~esentimg the earth. The resulting interaction equation is solved by ~ m ~ i c a l iteration techniques fc~ a model of a nuclear Power plant subjected to actual earthquake ground excitation. The effects of the soil-structure interaction are evaluated by c ~ i D g free-field acceleration spectrmn response etlrves with similar curves determined from the four~lation motion. These effects are foumd to be significant for structures typical of modern nuclear power plants subjected to seismic ground motions. Auth.