Crosslinked on novel nanofibers with thermophilic carbonic anhydrase for carbon dioxide sequestration

Crosslinked on novel nanofibers with thermophilic carbonic anhydrase for carbon dioxide sequestration

Journal Pre-proof Crosslinked on novel nanofibers with thermophilic carbonic anhydrase for carbon dioxide sequestration Sefli Sri Wahyu Effendi, Chen...

6MB Sizes 0 Downloads 24 Views

Journal Pre-proof Crosslinked on novel nanofibers with thermophilic carbonic anhydrase for carbon dioxide sequestration

Sefli Sri Wahyu Effendi, Chen-Yaw Chiu, Yu-Kaung Chang, ISon Ng PII:

S0141-8130(19)38534-4

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.11.234

Reference:

BIOMAC 14015

To appear in:

International Journal of Biological Macromolecules

Received date:

22 October 2019

Revised date:

18 November 2019

Accepted date:

29 November 2019

Please cite this article as: S.S.W. Effendi, C.-Y. Chiu, Y.-K. Chang, et al., Crosslinked on novel nanofibers with thermophilic carbonic anhydrase for carbon dioxide sequestration, International Journal of Biological Macromolecules(2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.ijbiomac.2019.11.234

This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

© 2018 Published by Elsevier.

Journal Pre-proof Research article

Crosslinked on novel nanofibers with thermophilic carbonic

of

anhydrase for carbon dioxide sequestration

Department of Chemical Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 70101,

re

1

-p

ro

Sefli Sri Wahyu Effendi1, Chen-Yaw Chiu2, Yu-Kaung Chang2, I-Son Ng1*

Taiwan, ROC

Graduate School of Biochemical Engineering, Ming Chi University of Technology, New

Jo ur

na

Taipei City 24301, Taiwan, ROC

lP

2

*Corresponding author: I-Son Ng

Tel: +886-62757575-62648; Fax: +886-62344496 E-mail: [email protected] ORCID: 0000-0003-1659-5814 Co-authors’ email: Sefli Sri Wahyu Effendi ([email protected]) Chen-Yaw Chiu ([email protected]) Yu-Kaung Chang ([email protected])

1

Journal Pre-proof Abstract The recombinant Sulfurihydrogenibium yellowstonense carbonic anhydrase (SyCA) was covalently bonded on novel polyacrylonitrile (PAN) and polyethylene terephthalate (PET) nanofibers (PAN-PET-PAN donated as AEA) that was first fabricated by electrospinning. The resulting composite materials further crosslinked by the glutaraldehyde, which significantly increased thermostability up to 89.8% and 18.0% after heating at 60oC for 1 hour for immobilized crude and pure SyCA, respectively. After four repetitive attempts in the

of

demonstration of CO2 sequestration, immobilized crude and pure SyCA on AEA also

ro

effectively improved the total CaCO3 yields to be 5.8 folds and 2.2 folds compared to free

-p

enzyme. Furthermore, the endurance of immobilized crude was investigated on flue gasses,

re

which was retained its activity up to 57% on 50 mM NOx and 61% on 50 mM SOx presence. This is the first report of immobilized thermophilic SyCA on a novel nanofiber at the

lP

reusability, durability, sequestration of carbon dioxide, tolerant to sulfur oxides (SOx) and

na

nitrogen oxides (NOx) toxic gases and to prevent air pollution.

Jo ur

Keywords: Sulfurihydrogenibium yellowstonense; carbonic anhydrase; nanofiber; immobilization; sequestration

2

Journal Pre-proof 1. Introduction Carbonic anhydrase (CA, EC. 4.2.1.1) was an old enzyme since the first discovery in 1932 by Meldrum and Roughton, which were explained the mechanism by hydration reaction of carbon dioxide (CO2) to react with water and converted to bicarbonate ions [1]. The preliminary work has focused on the enzymatic kinetics effects of temperature, salt, and pH of CAs from blood [2]. Afterwards, CAs have become the forefront of scientific interest, from the understanding of mechanism reaction, structural and molecular biology, clinical

of

discovery to environmental issues. Recently, CAs have been extensively examined in global

ro

warming issues [3-4] because ecofriendly in global carbon metabolism and recycle [5],

-p

biomimetic CO2 sequestration process [4, 6]. On the other hand, CAs are also referred to as

re

metalloenzyme which classified into various classes (α, β, γ, δ, ζ, η and θ) hence the implication of zinc ions as its active site [3, 5-8]. The α-CAs are the most protrusive family

lP

that contain not only in members of mammals, fungi, and bacteria [9] but also represented the

na

highest kcat for 106 molecules of CO2 per second [7]. Hence, α-CAs class have been characterized and genetically cloned in model organisms including of CAs from human

Jo ur

pathogenic bacterium Vibrio cholerae and Neisseria gonorrhoeae [10, 11], halotolerant bacterium Hydrogenovibrio marinus [12], Aeribacillus pallidus and Lactobacillus delbrueckii as alkaline-tolerant [13, 14], and thermophilic bacterium Sulfurihydrogenibium azorense and Sulfurihydrogenibium yellowstonense YO3AOP1 [15, 16]. Our previous study has developed a high-throughput screening platform to explore higher activity CA from S. yellowstonense (SyCA) [17]. The SyCA was presented thermophilic and acidophilic properties that maintained 100% activity at 50oC with optimal pH at 3-5 [18]. Besides, SyCA existed activity at higher temperatures due to immobilizing an anchoring and self-labeling protein tag on it [19]. However, SyCA is still not capable of being intended for use in carbon capture biotechnology because of high costs in the application. Thus, 3

Journal Pre-proof immobilization is one of the solutions that is considered as a brilliant strategy to overcome the problem [3,8,20]. The immobilization of SyCA onto various matrices such as polyurethane foam [5], magnetic nanoparticles [8], and even surface immobilization of enzymes on E. coli outer membrane [17] which have previously been reported. Recently, electrospun nanofibers have been proven for immobilization, since it offers a sizeable surface-to-pores volume ratio, functionalized surfaces, multiple sites for interaction or attachment, low restriction of mass

of

transfer [21], higher adsorption capacity and faster than conventional membranes [22].

ro

Polyacrylonitrile (PAN), as a hydrophobicity electrospun material, has beneficial properties

-p

such as suitable for immobilization via covalent attachment [23], stable in storage, resistant to

re

general solvents, oxidation resistance [24], tolerant to chemical and mechanical strength [22]. In this study, recombinant SyCA in E. coli for protein expression, enzymatic

lP

characterization, and thermostability of immobilized crude and pure enzyme were performed.

na

Then, the eff ect of the glutaraldehyde used in the cross-linking reaction on a novel nanofiber PAN-PET-PAN (donated as AEA) by electrospinning of PAN and polyethylene terephthalate

Jo ur

(PET) was examined. Finally, the application of SyCA on the nanofiber system is discussed further to accomplish CO2 sequestration and to withstand the presence of toxic chemicals such as NOx and SOx.

2. Material and methods 2.1. Strains, plasmids, and media The E. coli BL21(DE3) harboring pET32a(+) with carbonic anhydrase from S. yellowstonense was used for enzyme production. Polyacrylonitrile (PAN) yarn (Mw 1.2·105 g/mol, containing 93% acrylonitrile and 7% vinyl acetate) was purchased from Fortune 4

Journal Pre-proof Industries Inc. (Taoyuan, Taiwan). Polyethylene terephthalate (PET) spun-bond fabric (basis mass 15 g per m2, thickness 90 μm, fiber diameter 300-500 μm) was supplied by Freudenberg Far Eastern Spunweb Co., Ltd. (Taoyuan, Taiwan). Glutaraldehyde solution of 25 % (wt) was purchased from AppliChem GmbH (Darmstadt, Germany). Other chemicals and solvents were purchased from BioBasic (Toronto, Canada) and Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA).

2.2. Culture conditions of SyCA

of

Recombinant E. coli cells were grown on LB plates (1.5% tryptone, 1.5% NaCl and 0.5%

ro

yeast extract) with 100 mg/L ampicillin antibiotics at 37°C for 12 h. A single colony was

-p

inoculated in LB medium with 100 mg/L ampicillin for pre-culture at 37°C for another 12 h

re

with shaking at 200 rpm. Then, the cells were diluted by 1:100 in LB medium with antibiotics and cultured at 37°C with 200 rpm agitation. The growth was monitored by measuring the

lP

biomass or optical density at 600nm (OD600) using the spectrophotometer (Molecular Devices,

na

America). As OD600 reached 0.6 ∼ 0.8, the cells were induced by 0.1 mM isopropyl-Dthiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) and 0.5 mM zinc ions (supplied by ZnSO4). Eventually, the

Jo ur

cells cultured for 16 h were harvested by centrifuging at 10,000 × g for 10 min and washed with deionized water for 2 times.

2.3. Purification and protein analysis Purification of SyCA was carried out by using a His-Trap column chromatography (GE Healthcare, United Kingdom). The crude enzyme of SyCA was filtered by syringe filter 0.22 µm and used for the purification process. The protein separation has used the gradient of imidazole between buffer A (consisted of 20 mM phosphate buffer, 0.5 mM NaCl, 20 mM imidazole) and buffer B (similarly with buffer A except for imidazole concentration which is 500 mM) to elute the target protein. The purification process was performed at 4°C. The total 5

Journal Pre-proof protein concentration was determined using a Bradford assay (Bio-Rad) with bovine serum albumin (BSA) as a protein standard. Finally, whole-cell, crude, and purified samples were analyzed by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) with 10% separating gel and 4% stacking gel. Proteins were conceived by staining with Coomassie blue R-250 and were scanned using an Image scanner.

2.4. Carbonic anhydrase assay based on CO2 hydration activity

of

CA activity was examined by Wilbur-Anderson assay (WAU) with modification [25]. The

ro

reaction was started by adding 9 mL ice-cold Tris-HCl (20 mM, pH 8.3) buffer with CO2

-p

saturated solution at 0°C, and 0.2 mL enzyme was mixed and transferred to stirring vials. The

re

probe of a standardized pH meter was inserted into test vials with further incubation at 0°C. Next, 6 mL of the substrate was added immediately into vials, and the time required for the

lP

pH changing from 8.3 to 6.3 was recorded. CA activity was calculated using WAU per

na

milliliter of sample. The definition for WAU is (T0–T)/T where T0 and T are measurements taken for the buffer (control) and the buffer containing sample, respectively. In order to

Jo ur

obtain the kinetic data, diff erent volumes of saturated CO2 solution ranging from 3 to 6 mL were added into 9 mL Tris−HCl (20 mM, pH 8.3) buff er augmented with deionized water to a total volume of 15 mL. The remainder of procedure were the same as described above. A approach involved an R-value of the net enzyme reaction rate was reported in the previous study [25], which can be calculated by Eq. (1), in which A means a mole of converted CO2 during the pH decrease from pH 8.3 to pH 6.3: 𝑅=

𝐴 𝐴 − 𝑇 𝑇𝑂

(1)

All of the data were equipped with the Michaelis-Menten model for calculation of Vmax and Km based on the following Eq. (2). 6

Journal Pre-proof 𝑉 = 𝑉𝑚𝑎𝑥

𝐶 𝐾𝑚 + 𝐶

(2)

In which C and V indicated CO2 concentration and velocity, respectively.

2.5. Preparation of PAN nanofibers and composite AEA The electrospinning process was performed at 298 K, and the operating parameters were

of

determined based on the previous study [22]. 15 g solution of PAN was prepared in dissolve in 100 mL of dimethylacetamide (DMA). 10 mL of PAN solution was placed into a syringe

ro

with a 21-gauge stainless steel nozzle. A syringe attached to a power supply and electrospun

-p

into nanofiber under the following conditions: voltage: 26.5 kV, syringe rate: 1.0 mL/h, tip to

re

collector distance: 15.8 cm, and the rotation rate of the collector: 24.0 cm/s. The nozzle

lP

moved along with the y-axis (20.0 cm) at a frequency of 12 times per min. The PAN electrospun nanofibrous mats were collected on PET fabric, which was attached to a ground

na

steel drum. One PET fiber and two PAN nanofibrous layers, designated as AEA, were

Jo ur

detached from the collector and processed using thermal pressing at 373 K for 1 h.

2.6. Immobilization of SyCA on AEA nanofibers The procedure of SyCA immobilization consists of three parts: (1) modification functional group of nanofibers (COONa to COOH), (2) immobilized SyCA by covalent bonding, and (3) enzymes crosslinked by glutaraldehyde (GA) treatment. The AEA nanofibers were hydrolyzed by using chemical treatment with 2 mL of 3 M NaOH at 358 K for 20 min. The excess alkaline solution was removed, and nanofibers were washed with water. A 4 mL of 0.1 M HCl was transferred into the hydrolyzed nanofibers (designated as AEA-COOH), followed by enzyme washing and immobilization. The activated AEA-COOH nanofibers were adsorbed with SyCA solution (2 g/L) in 1 mL of deionized water, and the 7

Journal Pre-proof reaction vials were shaken at 85 rpm for 3 h at ambient temperature. The immobilization process was continued at low temperature at 4oC for 6 h, and the unbounded enzymes were removed by washing the nanofibers with 10 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.0). Finally, the immobilized enzymes were crosslinked to glutaraldehyde (GA) solution consisting of 25 % (wt) GA water solution and deionized water (1%, v/v), and then shaken at 60 rpm for 5 min at room temperature. Unreacted GA was washed excessively with 10 mM phosphate buffer (pH

ro

of

7.0). The activity of immobilized CA was further examined using Wilbur-Anderson assay.

2.7. Characterization of immobilized SyCA

-p

The surface morphology of nanofibers before and after CA immobilization was examined

re

by scanning electron microscopy (SEM; SU8100 Hitachi, Japan) operating at a 15 kV

lP

acceleration voltage. The surface coverage of crude and purified immobilized SyCA was analyzed using Biorad assay to determine protein adsorbed on nanofibers membranes, which

Jo ur

were calculated as follows:

na

parameters can be easily modeled by the Langmuir equation. The protein adsorbed amounts

𝑄=

(𝑞0 𝑥 𝑉0 ) − (𝑞 𝑥 𝑉) 𝑚

(3)

Besides, the calculation of equilibrium immobilization on the polymer surface based on the following equation.

𝜃=

𝑄 𝑞0

(4)

where Q is the protein adsorbed amounts (mg/g) onto the AEA nanofibers, qo is the initial concentration of protein (mg/mL), q is the final concentration (mg/mL), V0 and V are initial volume and final volume, m is the weight of nanofiber mats (g), and θ indicates surface coverage.

8

Journal Pre-proof 2.8. Effect of glutaraldehyde (GA) and temperature on the SyCA activities Enzymes including crude, pure, and immobilized samples were placed in a vial and then exposed to glutaraldehyde (GA) solution composed of 25 % (wt) GA solution and deionized water (1%, v/v). The mixture was incubated at various temperatures ranging from 60 to 80°C and room temperature. The residual activity of each temperature was examined by determining the enzyme activity of the original sample (at room temperature) as 100%. After that, the effect of GA was further examined for long-term stability (i.e., 15, 30, 45, and 60

of

min) while the residual activity was determined each time by the enzyme activity of sample,

-p

ro

which was heating 15 min as 100%.

re

2.9. Reusability of immobilized SyCA

The reusability of immobilized SyCA was washed with 10 mM sodium phosphate buffer

lP

solution (pH 7.0) and then added a new CO2 saturated substrate solution to start a new cycle.

Jo ur

activity as 100%.

na

The residual activity of each cycle was examined by determining the first cycle of enzyme

2.10. CO2 sequestration to CaCO3 by SyCA A two-column design was used for CO2 sequestration to form CaCO3 precipitation. CO2 gas was bubbled into the water, which was added with the SyCA crude enzyme or immobilized enzyme at a uniform flow rate for 6 min. Afterward, the mixture reaction was dropped down into the second column consisting of Ca(OH)2 saturated solution to form CaCO3 precipitated and collected by centrifugation. After one cycle use, immobilized SyCA was washed with 10 mM sodium phosphate buffer solution (pH 7.0) and reused in the twocolumn reactor for CO2 sequestration. Each cycle was centrifuged to collect the CaCO3 precipitate solids and weigh the dried. 9

Journal Pre-proof

2.11. Antitoxicity to sulfur oxides (SOx) and nitrogen oxides (NOx) The immobilized sample was incubated in HNO3 and H2SO4 solution, respectively, at concentrations of 25, 50, 75, 100, and 300 mM at room temperature for 15 min. The residual CA activity was measured by WAU, as described previously. All experiments were

of

performed in triplicate.

ro

3. Results and discussion

-p

3.1. Expression, activity and kinetic parameters of SyCA

re

The carbonic anhydrase gene was cloned in E. coli BL21 (DE3) and expressed using pET32a(+) vector, which driven by strong T7/lac promoter, as shown in Fig. 1a. Protein

lP

expression of SyCA that induced by IPTG was determined by SDS PAGE analysis (Fig. 1b)

na

As expected, at approximately 47.5 kDa in the soluble cytoplasmic form due to pET32a(+) contained a fused chaperone (Trx) in the N-terminal to assist the folding of protein [26, 27].

Jo ur

The recombinant SyCA from the soluble fraction has been purified by using one-step affinity chromatography and eluted the imidazole afterward by ultra-filtration. In this study, the recovery and purification fold of SyCA were 43.6% and 5 times, respectively. The previous study showed a 27% yield and 16 times of purification fold of recombinant CA from Sulfuryhydrogenibium sp. YO3APO1 after purification by affinity chromatography [5]. Another purified β- and γ- CAs from Bacillus sp. SS501 has been found 17 and 23 purification folds, whereas the recovery as 23% and 31%, respectively [28]. It implies SyCA purification by one-step affinity chromatography is a powerful and effective way to obtain higher yield, with the result of 43.6%.

10

Journal Pre-proof With respect to CA kinetic data, the mole of Tris-HCl buffer in the Tris part and dissociation rate of saturated CO2 in carbonic acid part were adopted to calculate A value. Tris was used for buffering the pH change, and the reaction could be simplified to the following equation: 𝐵𝐻 + ⇌ 𝐻 + + 𝐵 𝑝𝐾𝑎 = 8.76 at 0oC

(5)

By the thermodynamics property and calculation, the ratio of [B] and [BH+] was obtained as

of

-0.46 at pH 8.3. The mole of Tris was calculated as 4.64 x 10-5. Moreover, the dissociation

ro

rate found as 1.87 × 10−3, which was calculated by solubility (1.337 % mole fraction) as

-p

0.074 M. Finally, the total treated CO2 by Tris part and carbonic acid part is 2.48 × 10−2 mole as A value. After obtaining A value, the kinetic parameters between crude and purified SyCA

re

were determined by Lineweaver Burk plotting (Fig. 1c). The kinetic parameters were shown

lP

in Table 1, which the purified enzyme was presenting a higher Km value and indicating that it has a higher substrate affinity compared to that in the crude enzyme. Km was achieving half of

na

Vm, lower Km may be attributed to diffusion limitations, or cell membrane would inhibit the

Jo ur

CO2 diffusion [23, 25]. Thus, kcat/Km in terms of catalytic efficiency reported that the catalytic efficiency of the purified enzyme is 2.8 folds higher than that of crude enzyme. Moreover, SyCA has shown higher kcat than hCAI (i.e. 2.0 x 10−5) [29]. The activity crude and pure enzyme activities were 20557.2 U/mg and 35771.6 U/mg, respectively (Fig. 1d). Besides, crude CA from EX-H1 Persephonella marina, which has an extremely high thermostability of 100°C of 4960 U/mg [30], while crude mesophilic CA from Lactobacillus delbrueckii CGMCC 8137 showed 494 U/mg [31]. The purified CA from Black Sea trout (Salmo trutta Labrax Coruhensis) only showed 603.7 U/mg [31]. Therefore, S. yellowstonense was greatly possessed a higher CA activity compared to other thermophilic CAs. 11

Journal Pre-proof

3.2. Characterization of immobilized SyCA on nanofiber The procedure of SyCA immobilization was illustrated schematically in Fig. 2a. The structures of nanofibers before and after immobilizing SyCA were confirmed with SEM micrographs where the surface of the nanofibers became rougher after immobilizing enzymes (Fig. 2b). SEM was used to observe the structure of enzymes that were covalently attached to nanofibers [21]. Actually, the functional modification group of nanofiber was proved by color

of

changing from orange turn into yellowish under our observation, which indicated cation

ro

exchange of –COONa to –COOH was worked out [33]. The nanofibers can be produced in a

-p

thinner dimension to obtain more surface areas by using electrospun, which offers an

re

advantage in the increasing amount of functional groups on the matrix surfaces [34]. Therefore, the size of the nanofiber is an effective factor in determining the attachment and

lP

stabilization of the enzyme [35, 36]. Herein, the AEA produced by electrospun is a 1 to 2 m

na

homogenous fiber, which is similar to amylase immobilized on nanofiber of PVA/PAA [37]. Figure 3 demonstrates protein adsorbed, and surface coverage of SyCA prepared with

Jo ur

different protein concentrations on the hydrophobic AEA nanofibers. The optimum condition of pure and crude enzyme protein adsorbed on AEA was achieved using a protein concentrations of 0.4 mg/mL and 3 mg/mL, respectively. The maximum protein adsorbed on AEA were obtained to be 7.1 and 130.2 mg protein/g-AEA for pure and crude CA. Whereas, the maximum surface coverage was 85.7% in 0.3 mg/mL and 98.3% in 3 mg/mL. However, further increasing concentration of protein (up to 0.4 and 4 mg/mL) did not affect to enhance the surface coverage. Other studies have been reported the adsorption capacities on PAN nanofiber mats for dye and lipase to be 48.6 mg/g and 21.2 mg/g, respectively [38, 39]. The higher result of the adsorbed SyCA protein has proven that SyCA successfully bonded onto the modification of AEA nanofibers. 12

Journal Pre-proof On the other hand, the corresponding semireciprocal plots (qo/q versus qo) of the experimental data indicated the adsorption homogeneous as Langmuir model since it presented a linear plot [40, 41], which was R2 = 0.9505 for crude and R2 = 0.9775 for pure SyCA. Langmuir model showed not only the homogenous adsorption but also monolayer surface coverage. Monolayer immobilization enzymes offered stable covalent bonds on the support surface carrying compatible chemical groups. It often desired to achieve a controlled covalent binding, which provides a low surface agglomerate and an optimal orientation of

of

protein [42]. The orientation of surface coverage, as an independent measurement, presented

-p

ro

a correlation enzyme immobilization with enzymatic activity [43].

re

3.3. Characteristics of glutaraldehyde (GA) effect on SyCA activity

lP

AEA, as the immobilization matrix, has a high surface area of electrospun fibers, but it accounted for the initial higher release rate of protein from the matrix [34]. Glutaraldehyde

na

(GA) plays an essential role in a crosslinking reaction that prevents the leakage of protein

Jo ur

from the matrix and improves reusability on the immobilization of enzymes [44]. Despite this, sometimes, GA causes inactive proteins to reduce enzyme activity [45]. The effect of 0.1% GA on SyCA activity was studied and showed in Fig. 4. The activity of enzymes declined as GA added, especially immobilized samples. The CA activity of crude/GA, immobilized crude/GA, pure/GA, and immobilized pure/GA samples were decreased to 18615, 1481, 23459, and 6295 U/mg. In order to examine thermostability, the samples were incubated at temperature range 6080oC using the same concentration of GA after heating for 15 mins (Fig. 5a). Interestingly, immobilized crude/GA achieved the most stable residual activity up to more than 150% at all temperatures when compared to other samples. In contrast, immobilized of pure/GA was declined the residual activity to 28% as increasing temperature to 80oC. We speculated that at 13

Journal Pre-proof higher temperatures, the purified samples could easily undergo denaturation, while crude enzymes might be due to the conformation of other rigid proteins. Besides, the secondary covalent bonds would be formed between immobilized crude and GA crosslinking. GA has been reported showing high reactivity towards the amine group of CA and hydroxyl group of nanofibers [46]. In further experiments, the thermal stability of the GA effect was also demonstrated by using crude, pure, and immobilized samples. All samples were inspected using various heating time at 60oC as optimum temperature. As shown in Fig. 5b, crude/GA,

of

and its immobilization were presented unique ability with the enhancement of their residual

ro

activity as heating time increased. Differently, the free of pure samples only retained 27.2%

-p

activity after 60 min, while immobilized pure enzyme had 118% of its activity after 60 min at

re

60oC. The improving thermal stability on immobilized enzyme referred to increasing interactions between the structure of nanofibers in surface hydrophobic and enzyme with the

lP

reduction of the conformational arrangement of enzyme molecules [44]. Practical

na

applications of immobilized SyCA have been described in previous studies, which were used covalent binding between enzyme and the support. Immobilization via covalent bonds is

Jo ur

suitable for SyCA molecules due to the availability of functional groups between hydroxyl groups and amine groups. As list in Table 2, the long-term stability of immobilized SyCA over 100% after one month has been maintained by using polyurethane foam and magnetic nanoparticles as matrix support [7, 8]. Merlo et al. established an in vivo one-step procedure of enzyme immobilization on the E. coli surface as biological supports. A novel Anchoringand-Self-Labelling-protein-tag (ASLtag) can be a way to increase the thermostability of enzymes [47].

3.4. Application of immobilized SyCA in biomineralization and tolerant to toxicity

14

Journal Pre-proof In the commercial point of view, reusability is an important characterization for potential applications of biocatalysts. Figure 6a shows the effect of repeated uses on the residual activity of the immobilized crude and purified SyCA, even though the residual activities of the immobilized CA decayed with the increasing number of recycles. The loss of activity in these steps may be related to the inactivation of the enzyme caused by protein denaturation, and the leakage of protein from the support surfaces upon use [21]. The immobilized purified SyCA non-GA was retained 36.6% activity whereas the best reusability after 5 consecutive

of

uses since immobilized pure/GA only retained 8.0% activity. Besides, immobilized crude

ro

SyCA/GA showed higher activity than non-GA, which was proved crude enzyme has unique

-p

characteristics on GA crosslinked effects. The potential application of immobilized SyCA

re

would be extended by investigating the sequestration of CaCO3 and toxic resistance ability. From other CA species, rBhCA was successfully modified with functional group in the

lP

original adsorption to increase reusability [48]. Furthermore, BCA has potentially interacting

na

enzymes that are covalently attached to support by functional groups in bonding via sidechain amino groups [49] and epoxy groups [50]. Although SyCA did not show more recycle

Jo ur

uses than other CA species, a novel nanofiber materials has the first successfully reported and demonstrated its reusability.

As given in Fig. 6b and 6c, the CaCO3 yields of immobilized SyCA were higher than the free one. The immobilized samples were prepared by using different conditions and demonstrated up to 4 times repeated uses. Among crude samples: crude, immobilized crude and immobilized crude/GA were obtained 28.1, 163.4, and 110.3 mg of total CaCO3 yields. Surprisingly, purified samples obtained prodigious CaCO3 solids. Pure, immobilized pure and immobilized pure/GA were gained 315.9, 688.1, and 591.9 mg of total CaCO3 yields. However, to our best knowledge, purified SyCA was challenging to prepare, which requires a higher cost of equipment and also is impossible to recycle. 15

Journal Pre-proof Other requirements of CA used in the industrial application is tolerance of toxic chemical species from flue gases (i.e., SOx and NOx). As shown in Fig. 7a and 7b, immobilized crude/GA represented a significant increase of residual enzyme activity up to 57.1% and 61.6% in the presence of 50 mM HNO3 and H2SO4 when compared to free samples, which was retained only 14.8% and 10.2% at the same conditions. The enzymatic tolerance of SOx and NOx is ranking from immobilized with GA > immobilized > free CA. Finally, immobilized crude/GA also lost the activity at higher concentrations solution representative

of

of HNO3 and H2SO4. It was assumed that GA has secondary interaction to make substantial

ro

denaturation of proteins. The effects of SOx and NOx are of interest since the trace amount of

-p

chemicals is strictly control and inhibits CA activity [51, 52]. However, the potential of co-

re

immobilized CA with GA on AEA would eliminate the adverse effect and increased the

Jo ur

na

lP

tolerance in this study.

16

Journal Pre-proof 4. Conclusions A novel of crosslinked GA effect on enzyme bounded has been explored for the first time. Crosslinked GA has shown unique characteristics on immobilized crude SyCA, which is different from other CAs type, leading to tolerance towards GA effect and the enhanced thermal stability. Furthermore, it could make the process more economically feasible and effectively reduced the cost since it was able to reuse for CO2 biomineralization and the preparation of crude enzyme uncomplicated as the pure enzyme. The findings of the present

of

study suggested that surface-functionalized electrospun nanofibers are potential support for

ro

immobilization and immobilized SyCA as a promising novel for industrial application since

Jo ur

na

lP

re

-p

its durability to NOx and SOx presence.

17

Journal Pre-proof Acknowledgements The authors are grateful to the financial support for this study provided by the Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST 108-2621-M-006-015, MOST 108-2221-E-006-004-MY3 and MOST 108-2218-E-006-006) in Taiwan.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

of

All the authors have read and agreed the ethics for publishing the manuscript.

ro

Consent for publication

re

-p

The authors approved the consent for publishing the manuscript.

Competing interests

Jo ur

na

lP

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

18

Journal Pre-proof References: [1]

N.U. Meldrum, F.J. Roughton, Carbonic anhydrase. Its preparation and properties, J. Physiol. 80 (1933) 113-142.

[2]

C. Geers, G. Gros, Carbon dioxide transport and carbonic anhydrase in blood and muscle, Physiological Reviews 8 (2000) 681-715.

[3]

S.S. Effendi, I.S. Ng, The prospective and potential of carbonic anhydrase for carbon

of

dioxide sequestration: a critical review, Process Biochem. (2019)

[4]

ro

doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2019.08.018.

G. Hu, Z. Xiao, K. Smith, S. Kentish, G. Stevens, L.A. Connal, A carbonic anhydrase

C. Capasso, V. De Luca, V. Carginale, R. Cannio, M. Rossi, Biochemical properties of

lP

[5]

re

Chem. Eng. J. 332 (2018) 556-562.

-p

inspired temperature responsive polymer based catalyst for accelerating carbon capture,

a novel and highly thermostable bacterial α-carbonic anhydrase from

[6]

Jo ur

(2012) 892-897.

na

Sulfurihydrogenibium yellowstonense YO3AOP1, J. Enzyme. Inhib. Med. Chem. 27

D. Vullo, V. De Luca, A. Scozzafava, V. Carginale, M. Rossi, C.T. Supuran, C. Capasso, The first activation study of a bacterial carbonic anhydrase (CA). The thermostable α-CA from Sulfurihydrogenibium yellowstonense YO3AOP1 is highly activated by amino acids and amines, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 22 (2012) 6324-6327.

[7]

F. Migliardini, V. De Luca, V. Carginale, M. Rossi, P. Corbo, C.T. Supuran, C. Capasso, Biomimetic CO2 capture using a highly thermostable bacterial α-carbonic anhydrase immobilized on a polyurethane foam, J. Enzyme. Inhib. Med. Chem. 29 (2014) 146-150.

[8]

R. Perfetto, S. Del Prete, D. Vullo, G. Sansone, C.M. Barone, M. Rossi, C.T. Supuran, C. Capasso, Production and covalent immobilisation of the recombinant bacterial 19

Journal Pre-proof carbonic anhydrase (SspCA) onto magnetic nanoparticles, J. Enzyme. Inhib. Med. Chem. 32 (2017) 759-766. [9]

F. Fredslund, M.S. Borchert, J.C. Poulsen, S.B. Mortensen, M. Perner, W.R. Streit, L.L. Leggio, Structure of a hyperthermostable carbonic anhydrase identified from an active hydrothermal vent chimney, Enzyme Microb. Technol. 114 (2018) 48-54.

[10] S. Del Prete, V. De Luca, A. Scozzafava, V. Carginale, C.T. Supuran, C. Capasso, Biochemical properties of a new α-carbonic anhydrase from the human pathogenic

of

bacterium, Vibrio cholerae, J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem. 29 (2014) 23-27.

ro

[11] S. Huang, Y. Xue, E. Sauer-Eriksson, L. Chirica, S. Lindskog, B.H. Jonsson, Crystal

-p

structure of carbonic anhydrase from Neisseria gonorrhoeae and its complex with the

re

inhibitor acetazolamide, J. Mol. Biol. 283 (1998) 301-310. [12] B.H. Jo, S.K. Im, H.J. Cha, Halotolerant carbonic anhydrase with unusual N-terminal

lP

extension from marine Hydrogenovibrio marinus as novel biocatalyst for carbon

na

sequestration under high-salt environments, J. CO2 Util. 26 (2018) 415-24. [13] H. Bose, T. Satyanarayana, Suitability of the alkalistable carbonic anhydrase from a

Jo ur

polyextremophilic bacterium Aeribacillus pallidus TSHB1 in biomimetic carbon sequestration, Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 39 (2016) 1515-1525. [14] C.X. Li, X.C. Jiang, Y.J. Qiu, J.H. Xu, Identification of a new thermostable and alkalitolerant α-carbonic anhydrase from Lactobacillus delbrueckii as a biocatalyst for CO2 biomineralization, Bioresources and Bioprocessing, 2 (2015) 44. [15] D. Vullo, V. De Luca, A. Scozzafava, V. Carginale, M. Rossi, C.T. Supuran, C. Capasso, The extremo-α-carbonic anhydrase from the thermophilic bacterium Sulfurihydrogenibium azorense is highly inhibited by sulfonamides, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 21 (2013) 4521-4525.

20

Journal Pre-proof [16] V. De Luca, D. Vullo, A. Scozzafava, V. Carginale, M. Rossi, C.T. Supuran, C. Capasso, Anion inhibition studies of an α-carbonic anhydrase from the thermophilic bacterium Sulfurihydrogenibium yellowstonense YO3AOP1, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 22 (2012) 5630-5634. [17] R. Merlo, S. Del Prete, A. Valenti, R. Mattossovich, V, Carginale, C.T. Supuran, C. Capasso, G. Perugino, An AGT-based protein-tag system for the labelling and surface immobilization of enzymes on E. coli outer membran, J. Enzyme. Inhib. Med. Chem.

of

34 (2019) 490-499.

ro

[18] K.P. Hsu, S.I. Tan, C.Y. Chiu, Y.K. Chang, I.S. Ng, ARduino‐ pH Tracker (ART) and

-p

screening platform for characterization of recombinant carbonic anhydrase in

re

Escherichia coli, Biotechnol. Prog. (2019) doi: 10.1002/btpr.2834 [19] S. Del Prete, R. Merlo, A. Valenti, R. Mattossovich, M. Rossi, V. Carginale, C.T.

lP

Supuran, G. Perugino G, C. Capasso, Thermostability enhancement of the α-carbonic

na

anhydrase from Sulfurihydrogenibium yellowstonense by using the anchoring-and-self-

954.

Jo ur

labelling-protein-tag system (ASL tag), J. Enzyme. Inhib. Med. Chem. 34 (2019) 946-

[20] N.R. Mohamad, N.H.C. Marzuki, N.A. Buang, F. Huyop, R.A. Wahab, An overview of technologies for immobilization of enzymes and surface analysis techniques for immobilized enzymes, Biotechnol. Biotec. Eq. (2015), pp. 205-220. [21] J.M. Park, M. Kim, H.S. Park, A. Jang, J. Min, Y.H. Kim, Immobilization of lysozymeCLEA onto electrospun chitosan nanofiber for effective antibacterial applications, Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 54 (2013) 37-43. [22] S.S. Wang, S.M. Yang, A. Hsin, Y.K. Chang, Dye-affinity nanofibrous membrane for adsorption of lysozyme: preparation and performance evaluation, Food Technol. Biotechnol. 56 (2018) 40. 21

Journal Pre-proof [23] C. Tang, C.D. Saquing, S.W. Morton, B.N. Glatz, R.M. Kelly, S.A. Khan, Cross-linked polymer nanofibers for hyperthermophilic enzyme immobilization: Approaches to improve enzyme performance, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 6 (2014) 11899-11906. [24] Y. Li, H. Wang, J. Lu, A. Chu, L. Zhang, Z. Ding, S. Xu, Z. Gu, G. Shi, Preparation of immobilized lipase by modified polyacrylonitrile hollow membrane using nitrile-click chemistry, Bioresour. Technol. 274 (2019) 9-17. [25] S.I. Tan, Y.L. Han, Y.J. Yu, C.Y. Chiu, Y.K. Chang, S. Ouyang, K.C. Fan, K.H. Lo,

ro

anhydrase, Process Biochem. 73 (2018) 38-46.

of

I.S. Ng, Efficient carbon dioxide sequestration by using recombinant carbonic

-p

[26] X. Zhang, I.S. Ng, J.S. Chang, Cloning, expression and characterization of a robust

re

recombinant azoreductase from Shewanella xiamenensis BC01, J.Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 61 (2016) 97–105.

lP

[27] J. Zhang, X. Lv, R. Xu, X. Tao, Y. Dong, A. Sun, D. Wei, Soluble expression, rapid

na

purification, and characterization of human interleukin-24 (IL-24) using a MBP-SUMO

6713.

Jo ur

dual fusion system in Escherichia coli, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 99 (2015) 6705-

[28] N. Maheshwari, M. Kumar, I.S. Thakur, S. Srivastava, Cloning, expression and characterization of β-and γ-carbonic anhydrase from Bacillus sp. SS105 for 10 biomimetic sequestration of CO2, Int. J. Biol. Macromol. (2019). [29] T. Wingo, C. Tu, P.J. Laipis, D.N. Silverman, The catalytic properties of human carbonic anhydrase IX, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 3 (2001), 666-669. [30] B.K. Kanth, S.Y. Jun, S. Kumari, S.P. Pack, Highly thermostable carbonic anhydrase from Persephonella marina EX-H1: Its expression and characterization for CO2sequestration applications, Process Biochem. 49 (2014), 2114-2121.

22

Journal Pre-proof [31] C.X. Li, X.C. Jiang, Y.J. Qiu, J.H. Xu, Identification of a new thermostable and alkalitolerant α-carbonic anhydrase from Lactobacillus delbrueckii as a biocatalyst for CO2 biomineralization, Bioresour. Bioprocess. 2 (2015), 44. [32] M. Kucuk, I. Gulcin, Purification and characterization of the carbonic anhydrase enzyme from Black Sea trout (Salmo trutta Labrax Coruhensis) kidney and inhibition effects of some metal ions on enzyme activity, Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 44 (2016), 134-139.

of

[33] I.S. Ng, C.P. Song, C.W. Ooi, B.T. Tey, Y.H. Lee, Y.K. Chang, Purification of

ro

lysozyme from chicken egg white using nanofiber membrane immobilized with

-p

Reactive Orange 4 dye, Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 134 (2019) 458-468.

re

[34] J. Zhu, G. Sun, Facile fabrication of hydrophilic nanofibrous membranes with an immobilized metal–chelate affinity complex for selective protein separation, ACS appl.

lP

mater. interfaces 6 (2014) 925-932.

61 (2006) 1017-1026.

na

[35] J. Kim, J.W. Grate, P. Wang, Nanostructures for enzyme stabilization, Chem. Eng. Sci.

Jo ur

[36] X. Ren, A. Akdag, C. Zhu, L. Kou, S.D. Worley, T.S. Huang, Electrospun polyacrylonitrile nanofibrous biomaterials, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2 (2009) 385-390. [37] E. Basturk, S. Demir, O. Danis, M.V. Kahraman, Covalent immobilization of aamylase onto thermally crosslinked electrospun PVA/PAA nanofibrous hybrid membranes, J. App. Polym. Sci. 127 (2013) 349-355. [38] P. Ye, Z.K. Xu, J. Wu, C. Innocent, P. Seta, Nanofibrous poly (acrylonitrile-co-maleic acid) membranes functionalized with gelatin and chitosan for lipase immobilization Biomaterials 27 (2006) 4169-4176. [39] T. Lou, X. Yan, X. Wang, Chitosan coated polyacrylonitrile nanofibrous mat for dye adsorption, Int. J. Biol. Macromol. (2019) doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.06.008 23

Journal Pre-proof [40] H. Zhang, H. Nie, D. Yu, C. Wu, Y. Zhang, C.J. White, L. Zhu, Surface modification of electrospun polyacrylonitrile nanofiber towards developing an affinity membrane for bromelain adsorption, Desalination 256 (2010) 141-147. [41] F. Huang, Y. Xu, S. Liao, D. Yang, Y.L. Hsieh, Q. Wei, Preparation of amidoxime polyacrylonitrile chelating nanofibers and their application for adsorption of metal ions, Materials, 6 (2013) 969-980. [42] G. Faccio, From protein features to sensing surfaces, Sensors 18 (2018) 1204.

of

[43] Y. Li, T.L. Ogorzalek, S. Wei, X. Zhang, P. Yang, J. Jasensky, C.L. Brooks, E.N.

ro

Marsh, Z. Chen, Effect of immobilization site on the orientation and activity of surface-

-p

tethered enzymes, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 20 (2018) 1021-1029.

re

[44] Yİ. Doğaç, İ. Deveci, B. Mercimek, M. Teke, A comparative study for lipase immobilization onto alginate based composite electrospun nanofibers with effective and

lP

enhanced stability, Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 96 (2017) 302-311.

na

[45] K.M. Woo, I. Lee, S.G. Hong, S. An, J. Lee, E. Oh, J. Kim, Crosslinked chitosan coating on magnetic mesoporous silica with pre-adsorbed carbonic anhydrase for

Jo ur

carbon dioxide conversion, Chem. Eng. J. 276 (2015) 232-239. [46] K.C. Figueiredo, T.L. Alves, C.P. Borges, Poly (vinyl alcohol) films crosslinked by glutaraldehyde under mild conditions, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 11 (2009) 3074-3080. [47] R. Merlo, S. Del Prete, A. Valenti, R. Mattossovich, V. Carginale, C.T. Supuran, C. Capasso, G. Perugino, An AGT-based protein-tag system for the labelling and surface immobilization of enzymes on E. coli outer membrane, J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem. 34 (2019) 490-499. [48] S. Faridi, H. Bose, T. Satyanarayana, Utility of immobilized recombinant carbonic anhydrase of Bacillus halodurans TSLV1 on the surface of modified iron magnetic nanoparticles in carbon sequestration, Energy Fuels 31 (2017), 3002-3009. 24

Journal Pre-proof [49] P.C. Sahoo, N.S. Sambudi, S.B. Park, J.H. Lee, J.I. Han, Immobilization of carbonic anhydrase on modified electrospun poly (lactic acid) membranes: quest for optimum biocatalytic performanc, Catal. Letters 145 (2015), 519-526. [50] G. Jing, F. Pan, B. Lv, Z. Zhou, Immobilization of carbonic anhydrase on epoxyfunctionalized magnetic polymer microspheres for CO2 capture, Process Biochem. 50 (2015), 2234-2241. [51] G.M. Bond, J. Stringer, D.K. Brandvold, F.A. Simsek, M.G. Medina, G. Egeland,

of

Development of integrated system for biomimetic CO2 sequestration using the enzyme

ro

carbonic anhydrase, Energy Fuels 15 (2001), 309-316

-p

[52] S. Faridi, T. Satyanarayana, Characteristics of recombinant α-carbonic anhydrase of

re

polyextremophilic bacterium Bacillus halodurans TSLV1, Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 89

Jo ur

na

lP

(2016) 659-668.

25

Journal Pre-proof Figure legends

Fig. 1. (a) Map of pET32a-SyCA. (b) Protein expression analysis by SDS PAGE. Lane 1: M, lane 2: no isopropyl β-D-1thiogalactopyranosdie (IPTG) induction, lane 3 to 7 are with 0.1 mM IPTG. M, WC, C, UB, P1 and P2 mean marker, whole cell, crude enzyme, purification sample from unbound peak, purification sample containing imidazole, purification sample after 30 kDa ultrafiltration. (c) Lineweaver-Burk plot for inverse of CA activity (CO2 sec

of

mole-1, Y) and 1/P (atm-1, X) of CO2, where Y = 0.7151 X + 4763 with R2 = 0.9946 for crude

ro

(black) and Y = 0.7861 X + 3694 with R2 = 0.9910 for pure (white) CA, respectively. (d)

re

-p

crude and pure enzymatic activity determined by Wilbur-Anderson assay.

Fig. 2. (a) The schematic illustration of CA immobilization on AEA nanofibers. SEM

lP

analysis of the AEA nanofibers without enzyme at (b) 5 m (c) 50 m, and with the enzyme

na

at (d) 5 m (e) 50 m, respectively.

Jo ur

Fig. 3. Physical equilibrium of immobilization CA on the AEA membrane surface. The relative surface coverage and protein adsorbed of crude (black) and pure SyCA (grey) were analyzed by different protein concentrations.

Fig. 4. Characterization of glutaraldehyde (GA) effect on SyCA activity between crude and pure, crude, or pure with GA, crude or pure immobilized on AEA.

Fig. 5. Temperature effect on SyCA activity between crude and pure, crude or pure with GA, crude or pure immobilized on AEA. (a) 60oC (blue bar), 70oC (red bar), and 80oC (green bar).

26

Journal Pre-proof (b) thermal stability at 60oC heating treatment and for 15 min (purple bar), 30 min (blue bar), 45 min (red bar), and 60 min (green bar).

Fig. 6. (a) Residual relative activity for reusability of immobilized SyCA. Crude (white circle), crude/GA crosslinked (red circle), purified (white triangle), and purified/GA crosslinked (red triangle). (b) Biosequestration of CO2 to CaCO3 between crude and pure, crude or pure with GA, crude or pure immobilized on AEA by 4 recycling uses (1st cycle:

ro

of

gray bar, 2nd cycles: tosca bar, 3rd cycles: red bar and 4th cycles: green bar).

-p

Fig. 7. (a) NOx and (b) SOx effects on the crude enzyme (circle), immobilized crude

Jo ur

na

lP

re

(square), and immobilized crude with GA crosslinked (triangle).

27

Journal Pre-proof Table 1. Comparison of kinetic parameters of crude enzyme and purified of SyCA Specific activity (U/mg)

Protein concentration (mg/mL)

Enzyme

kcat (1/s)

Km (M)

kcat / Km (1/M s)

Crude enzyme

8.818 x 104

0.150

5.879 x 105

20,557

3.616

Purified

2.444 x 105

0.213

1.147 x 106

35,771

1.578

Residual activity (%)

Ref.

ro

of

Table 2. Characteristics of different materials used for immobilization of carbonic anhydrase. Immobilization method

Reusability (times) 30* 30*

100 100

[7] [8]

ND

ND

[46]

22

50

[47]

PLA

Adsorption of functional groups Covalent binding

10

43.7

[48]

BCA

GO/PLA

Covalent binding

10

78.9

[48]

BCA

nMOF/PLA

Covalent binding

10

69.3

[48]

BCA

Magnetic microspheres AEA nanofibers

Covalent binding

6

47.6

[49]

Covalent binding

5

36.6

This study

Support material

SspCA SspCA

Covalent binding Covalent binding

SspCA

PU foam magnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles E. coli surface

ASLtag in vivo

rBhCA

Si-MNPs

BCA

*

re

lP

na

Jo ur

SyCA

-p

CA sources

The long-term stability is for 30 days. ND means not-determined.

28

Journal Pre-proof

Highlight:  Recombinant carbonic anhydrase (CA) was immobilized on a novel nanofiber.  CA was immensely coverage on the nanofiber surface via covalent binding.  Glutaraldehyde aided on improvement thermostability of immobilized CA.  Immobilized CA was successfully reused and augmented CaCO3 yields.

Jo ur

na

lP

re

-p

ro

of

 Immobilized CA has a remarkable sulfur oxides and nitrogen oxides tolerance.

29

Figure 1

Figure 2

Figure 3

Figure 4

Figure 5

Figure 6

Figure 7