Crustal structure of the Bonin Trough

Crustal structure of the Bonin Trough

Tectonophysics, 345 181 (1990) 345-350 Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam Crustal structure of the Bonin Trough H. Katao ‘, R. Hino 2, H...

816KB Sizes 0 Downloads 56 Views

Tectonophysics,

345

181 (1990) 345-350

Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam

Crustal structure of the Bonin Trough H. Katao ‘, R. Hino 2, H. Kinoshita ’ Earthquake Research instifute, ’ Observation

3 and S. Nagumo

‘,*

University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113 (Japan)

Center for Prediction of Earthqaakes and Volcanic Eruptions, Faculty of Science, Tohoku University, Sendai 980 (Japan) ’ Deparimeni of Earth Sciences, Chiba University, Chiba 260 (Japan)

(Received May 6,1989; revision accepted November 3, 1989)

ABSTRACT Katao, H., Hino, R., Kinoshita, H. and Nagumo, S., 1990. Crustal structure of the Bonin Trough In: M. Kono and B.C. Burchfiel (Editors), Tectonics of Eastern Asia and Western Pacific Continental Margin. Tectonopbysics, 181: 345-350 A seismic refraction study using OBSH and explosives was carried out in the Benin Trough. The P-wave velocity model along the trough axis consists of 4 layers; the velocities, VP, of these layers are from top to bottom 2.0, 3.6, 6.3 and 7.8 km s-’ respectively. The thickness of the crust is 13 km at the northern part of the trough, and becomes thicker toward the south. The negative free-air anomaly pattern in the trough can be explained by thickening of the crust.

Introduction The Bonin area has many interesting features. The seismicity pattern and the dip of deep seismic plane of the Izu-Bonin Arc changes at the north end of the Bonin area. The Benin Plateau and a line of seamounts collide with the Izu-Benin Trench along the southern part of the Bonin Trough. One of the largest free-air gravity anomalies in the world is observed over the Benin Ridge. The Bonin Trough is developed between the (young volcanic) Shichito-Iwoto Ridge and the (old fore-arc) Bonin Ridge. The depth of the trough is mostly more than 4000 m, and the bottom has smooth topography. The Bonin Trough is interpreted to have formed in Tertiary time, but is presently inactive (Honza and Tamaki, 1985). The structure and origin of the trough is not well understood. The determination of the fine seismic structure of the trough is

* Present address: Hawaii Institute of Geophysics, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA. ~~*1951/~/$03.50

Q 1990 - Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.

needed to decipher the tectonic history of this area. Few refraction studies have been carried out in the Izu-Bonin Arc region. A crustal section across the northern part of the Izu-Benin Arc and Trench along latitude 32”N was presented by Hotta (1970). The crustal structure along latitude 23.5 o N (the junction area of the Mariana Arc and the Bonin Arc) was obtained by Murauchi et al. (1968). Tanahashi et al. (1981) carried out a sonobuoy refraction survey to resolve the shallow structure in the Bonin Trough. In the late fall of 1987, as a part of the Japanese Lithosphere Research Program (DELP: Dynamics and Evolution of the Lithosphere Project), geophysical and geological research cruises were made in the Bonin area (Japanese DELP Research Group on Back-arc Basins, 1989). During the DELP 1987 cruises, seismic refraction experiments were carried out in the Bonin Trough along two perpendicular profiles (Hino et al., 1989; Katao et al.a, 1989). They were named Line A (trending north-south) and Line B (trending east-west). In the following, we report the preliminary results for the N-S trending line (Line A; Fig. 1).

H. KATAO

346

Experiment and processing

calculated time

The objective derive

of the survey

the seismic

structure

on Line A was to

along

the trough

from the sea floor to the uppermost ocean

bottom

(OBSHs) along

seismometers

(BT-1 to BT-7, Table

the 335 km of Line

free-fall

pop-up-type

(BT-6D)

was equipped

system

(Kasahara

were equipped

mantle.

with

Eight

A. All of them One

a digital

et al., 1985),

and

with direct analogue

were

fired

along

about

3.5 km. Explosives

from

this

a running

line.

the others sys-

size was 5-20 kg) were

Spacing

research

of the shots

All were

tems. (Nagumo et al., 1982) Large explosive charges were used as controlled seismic sources. Four large explosions (charge size 300-400 kg) and 91 small shots (charge

by LORAN-C system.

was

prior stored

observed

by the

vessel. Lo-

were determined

combined

ac-

with the NNSS

All the OBSHs data

were

on a series

processed

by means

supported

were success-

converted

by a graphic

to digital

The digital

of magnetic

tapes,

of a mini-computer display

data and

system

system.

An example of the seismograms is presented. All show the vertical component of the geophone without

an amplitude

Figure

correction.

2a is a record

BT-7 which is located A. The reduced

vessel.

fracted

were

the arrival

the research

to data processing.

were fused and dropped Shot times

wave

and

after the operation.

analogue

records

recording

speed

of shots and OBSHs

fully retrieved

OBSH

recording

cations

water

towed behind

navigation

1) were deployed

the ship’s

of the direct

hydrophone curately

hydrophones

instruments. with

axis

from

ET AL.

phase

section

velocity from

obtained

at the northern lower

at station end of Line

is 8.0 km sP ‘. The recrust

appears

as first

30”N

27’N

14.1”E Fig. 1. Location

of DELP 1987 refraction

experiments.

Solid circles represent

positions

143”E of the OBSHs

used in this study.

CRUSTAL

STRUCTURE

TABLE

OF THE BONlN

347

TROUGH

1

Location

of OBSHs

and periods

of observation.

Latitude

Longitude

Depth

Period (JST)

N

E

(m)

deployment

BT-1

26O 01.95’

141”41.08’

3455

Nov. 12

3:30

Nov. 17

19:19

BT-2

26O37.95’

141°41.08’

3650

Nov. 11

23:20

Nov. 17

23:49

BT-3

27 a 01.99’

141O33.43’

4005

Nov. 11

19:20

Nov. 18

4:38

BT-4

27O 37.99’

141 o 29.70’

4140

Nov. 11

15:00

Nov. 18

9:16

BT-5

28’= 07.98’

141O25.96’

4160

Nov. 11

11:30

Nov. 18

14:30

28O40.64’

141O22.02

4055

Nov. 11

3124

Nov. 18

19:20

28 O40.74’

141O22.12’

4055

Nov. 11

3:18

Nov. 18

19:15

29°08.00’

141O18.43’

4010

Nov. 10

18:15

Nov. 18

23:34

Station

BT-6 BT-6D

*

BT-7 * Digital

breaks traced

retrieval

OBSH.

at distances beyond 20 km, and can be up to a distance of about 60 km. The

slightly less than 8.0 km SC*, and the intercept time of P, is about 8 s. The record section obtained at BT-4 which is

apparent velocity of this phase is about 6.0 km s-r, and increases continuously with distance. The P,, phases are observed at distances beyond 60 km

located at the center of the line is shown in Fig. 2b. The reduced velocity is 8.0 km s-‘. The P,

from the station. Although amplitude of the P,, phase is very small, it can be detected clearly by the large explosions. The apparent velocity of P, is

phase is observed beyond 60 km from the OBSH, and has an intercept time of about 8 s similar to that of BT-7.

a

BT-7

b

BT-4

BT-1

C

0

Fig. 2. Examples explosions

of record

sections.

along Line A. for station

The reduced

velocity

is 8.0 km SC’ with no amplitude

BT-7 with only the vertical Record

component

section of station

correction.

of the geophone. BT-1.

(a) Record

(b) Record

section

section of dynamite for station

BT-4. (c)

H. KATAO

348

The record section at BT-1 which is located at southern end of the line is shown in Fig. 2c. Although the records are noisy due to bottom currents, the P,, phase can be seen beyond about 80 km from the OBSH. The intercept time of P,, increases to about 9 s, and suggests that the Moho discontinuity is deeper below the southern part of the trough.

w

Cross polrlt

N

Distance

too

(kmf

0

too

200

lb)

E ET14 --1

\1

5 H - 10 II z 2 15

(6.5)

(6.5)

1 20 km

Fig. 4. Crustal

Modeling of the velocity structure was performed using two-dimensions ray tracing. Models were refined by forward modeling, until the calculated travel times coincided with the observed travel times within 0.1 s. An example of a ray tracing is shown in Fig. 3. High-density airgun shooting was not carried out along Line A. multi-ch~el reflection surveying also were not carried out along the northern half of Line A. Therefore, it was impossible to

BV3

O BTl2

20’

Structure modeling

ET AL.

structure

along

Line B obtained

by Hino et al.

(1989).

derive the fine structure of the shallow crust along Line A. A refraction survey using five OBSHs and high-density airgun shooting was carried out along Line B during the same cruise (Hino et al., 1989). The model of the crustal structure along Line B (Fig. 4) was assumed to be similar to the shallower structure of Line A. It is believed that the sediment structure along Line A is more complicated than along Line B. The multi-channel profile shows contamination of transparent layers and opaque material near the trough axis (Abe et al., 1989). The preens model for P-wave velocity (VP) structure along Line A is shown in Fig. 5. This model consists of four layers below the water layer (about 4 km thick, VP= 1.5 km s-r): (1) the sediment layer (about 2 km thick), (2) an intermediate layer (about 2 km thick), (3) a lower crustal layer (lo-14 km thick), and (4) the mantle, P-wave velocities of these layers from top to bottom are 2.0, 3.6, 6.3 and 7.8 km s-r respectively. The Moho depth increases from 17.5 km below Distance

N

0 #-J&l_L_l

j

-

(km)

100 / I ~_._LL.L,Y_II-j-1

1.5 I__

200

300 / / I 1

-

._.

.-.----

m

BT-5 BT-5. (a) Observed ponent adopted.

record

of the geophone Dots

t-_

of two-dimensional

represent

section record.

ray

travel

6.1

com-

correction time.

(b)

.____ i

---%---

for station

with only the vertical No amplitude

theoretical diagram.

tracing

--I

3.6 6.3

3. Example

!

I.5 __^_ __._..____.---~

-----------__

Fig.

S '.I-._

is Bay

Fig. 5. Preliminary Line A. Numerals

model

of P-wave

represent

velocity

structure

P-wave velocity in km s-‘.

along

CRUSTAL

STRUCTURE

OF THE

BONIN

TROUGH

the northern half of the trough to 21.0 km below the southern end of the line. The total crustal thickness ranges from 14 to 18 km. Although the water depth is much deeper in the Bonin Trough, its Moho depth is similar that of other regions of the Izu-Benin Arc (Murauchi et al., 1968; Hotta 1970). The negative free-air gravity anomalies in the Bonin Trough become larger toward the south (Ishihara et al., 1981) although the water depth is shallower in the southern part of the trough. It is difficult to explain this paradox by only a variation of sediment thickness. The gravity anomalies suggest that the Moho is deeper in the southern part of the trough as shown in our seismic model. (Recently, the model along Line B has been refined (Hino, 1989) confirming the main results on Line A.) Discussion

In Fig. 6, the velocity structure of the Benin Trough is compared with that of other basins. The Bonin Trough has an intermediate crustal thickness between continental and oceanic crust. The crustal thickness of the Yamato Basin in the Japan Sea, is 13-15 km, similar to that of the Bonin

Vp (km/s) 2.0

4.0

6.0

6.0

Fig. 6. AverageP-wave velocity structure of the Bonin Trough compared with other ocean basins. References: Yamato Basin, Hirata et al. (1987); North Sea, Barton and Wood (1984).

349

Trough, although the velocity structure of the Yamato Basin shows typical oceanic features (Hirata et al., 1987; Katao, 1988). The crust of the Bonin Trough is dominated by the 6.3 km s-’ layer. The second layer of our model has a P-wave velocity of 3.6 km s-l which is low when compared to typical oceanic basement, and the velocity gradient of the layer is not large when compared to that of typical oceanic layer 2. Even if our second layer consists of consolidated sediments (pyroclastics?), the velocity of the third layer (6.3 km s-r) is higher than the topmost part of typical oceanic layer 2. Thus, the crustal structure of the Bonin Trough is not identical to that of typical oceanic crust. Rather, this model seems to be similar to the structure of stretched continental crust, such as in the Central Graben of the North Sea (Barton and Wood, 1984). In this study, the diving wave through the lower part of the crust continuously increases its apparent velocity, and we cannot identify a velocity boundary in the lower part of the crust. The variation in the velocity gradient of the lower crust must be examined by further studies of amplitude and waveform analyses. The detailed reflection study shows that the basement of the trough dips eastward in a series of steps. This feature can be interpreted to be the result of normal faults formed by tension during the rifting of the trough in Tertiary time (Abe et al., 1989). The spreading in the Bonin Trough probably ceased during rifting of the island arc crust. The deepening of the basement and Moho discontinuity toward south in the trough revealed by the present analyses is in good agreement with the distribution of the negative free-air gravity anomaly (Ishihara et al., 1981). There are two negative depressions in the free-air gravity anomaly, a weak low of - 100 mgal in the northem part and a -200 mgal low in the southern part of the trough. This distribution is interpreted to be due partly to a deeper heavier basement or mantle layer dipping toward the south. A qualitative judgement shows that the seismic structure of the Moho boundary can explain the distribution of the free-air gravity anomaly fairly well. This deepening of the Moho boundary can be partly

n. KATAO

350

explained by some drag force of the subducting Pacific lithosphere underneath this region or by a simple fragmentation of the lithosphere of Philippine Sea plate due to collision with the seamount chain (Bonin Plateau). Conclusion

A seismic structure model along the axis of the Bonin Trough was obtained by refraction experiments using explosives and OBSHs. Beneath the water layer, the top layer of the crust is about 2 km thick with a I$ of 2.0 km s-l. The second layer is about 2 km thick with a VPof 3.6 km s-r. The lower crustal layer is about lo-14 km thick with a VP of 6.3 km s-t. The depth of Moho discontinuity is about 18-21 km below the sea surface. The I$ of the uppermost mantle is 7.8 km s-‘. The sedimentary basement as well as the Moho boundary is deeper in the southern part of the trough. The negative free-air anomary pattern in the trough is explained by the deepening of layer boundaries. Acknowledgements

Authors are greatly indebted to Drs. K. Suyehiro, T. Ouchi, H. Tokuyama, A. Nishizawa, Mrs. S. Koresawa, S. Abe, A. Kubo and all other participants of DELP for their help and valuable suggestions. Thanks are also due to Captain Miki and crew members of R/V “Wakashio-maru”, Nippon Salvage Co. Ltd. for their help and corporation during the surveys. Dr. B.C. Burchfiel kindly reviewed this manuscript. References Abe, S., Tokuyama, H., Kuramoto, S., Suyehiro, K., Nisbizawa, A. and Kinoshita, H., 1989. Report on DELP 1987 cruises in the Ogasawara area, II. Seismic reflection studies in the Ogasawara Trough. Bull. Ear&q. Res. Inst. Univ. Tokyo 64: 133-147. Barton, P. and Wood, R., 1984. Tectonic evolution of the North Sea basin: crustal streching and subsidence. Geophys. J.R. Astron. Sot., 79: 987-1022. Hino, R., 1989. A study on the crustal structure beneath the Benin Trough. MS. Thesis, Tohoku University, Tohoku.

ET AL.

Hino, R., Nishizawa, A., Suyehiro, K., Kinoshita, H.. Abe, S., Ouchi, T., K&o, A., Koresawa, S. and Nagumo, S., 1989. Report on DELP 198’7cruises in the Ogasawara area, Part III. Seismic refraction experiment using airgun-OBSH for fine crustal structure across the Ogasawara Trough along an east-west track line. Bull. Earthq. Res. inst. Univ. Tokyo, 64: 149-162. Hirata, N., Kinoshita, H., Suyehiro, K., Suyemasu, M., Mtsuda, N., Ouchi, T., Katao, H., Koresawa, S. and Nagumo, S., 1987. Report on DELP 1985 cruises on the Japan Sea, Part II. Seismic refraction experiment conducted in the Yamato Basin, Southeast Japan Sea. Bull. Earthq. Inst. Univ. Tokyo, 62: 341-365. Honza, E. and Tamaki, K., 1985. The Benin Arc. In: A.E.M. Nairn, F.G. Stehli and S. Uyeda (Editors), The Ocean Basin and Margins, Vol. 7A. pp. 459-502. Hotta, H., 1970. A seismic section across the Izu-Ogasawara Arc and Trench. J. Phys. Earth, 18: 125-141. Ishihara, T.. Murakami, F., Miyazaki, T. and Nishimura, K., 1981. Gravity survey. In: The Geological Investigation of the Ogasawara (Bonin) and Northern Mariana Arcs, Cruise GH79-2, 3 and 4. Geological Survey of Japan, Tokyo, pp. 45-78. Japanese DELP Research Group on Back-arc Basins, 1989. Report on DELP 1987 cruises in the Ogasawara Area, I. General outline. Bull. Earthq. Res. Inst. Univ. Tokyo, 64: 119-131. Kasahara, J.. Takahashi, M., Matsubara. T. and Komiya, M., 1985. Mass storage digital ocean bottom seismometer and hydrophone (DOBSH) controlled by microprocessors using ADPCM voice synthesizing. Bull. Earthq. Res. Inst. Univ. Tokyo, 60: 23-37. Katao, H., 1988. Seismic structure and formation of the Yamato Basin. Bull. Earthq. Res. Inst. Univ. Tokyo, 63: 51-86. Katao, H., Nagumo, S., Koresawa, S., Hino, R., Nishizawa, A., Suyehiro, K., Ouchi, T., Kubo, A., Ishibashi, M., Ono, Y., Baba. H. and Kinoshita, H., 1989. Report on DELP 1987 cruises, IV. Explosion seismic refraction studies in the Ogasawara Trough. Bull. Earthq. Res. Inst. Univ. Tokyo, 64: 163-177. Murauchi, S., Den, N., Asano, S., Hotta, H., Yoshii, T., Asanuma, T., Hagiwara, K., Sato, T., Ludwig, W.J., Ewing, J.I., Edger, N.T. and Houtz, R.E., 1968Crustal structure of the Philippine Sea. J. Geophys. Res., 73: 3143-3171. Nagumo, S.. Kasahara, J., Koresawa S. and Murakami, H., 1982. Acoustic release ocean-bottom seismometer (ERIAR81). Bull. Earthq. Res. Inst. Univ. Tokyo, 57: 125-132 (in Japanese). Tanahashi, M., Tamaki, K. and Okuda, Y., 1981. Sonobouy refraction study. In: The Geological Investi~tion of the Ogasawara (Boninf and Northern Mariana Arcs, Cmise GH79-2, 92-94.

3 and 4. Geological Survey of Japan, Tokyo, pp.