Cryopreservation of boar sperm induces differential microRNAs expression

Cryopreservation of boar sperm induces differential microRNAs expression

Accepted Manuscript Cryopreservation of boar sperm induces differential microRNAs expression Yan Zhang, Dinghui Dai, Yu Chang, Yuan Li, Ming Zhang, Gu...

3MB Sizes 0 Downloads 69 Views

Accepted Manuscript Cryopreservation of boar sperm induces differential microRNAs expression Yan Zhang, Dinghui Dai, Yu Chang, Yuan Li, Ming Zhang, Guangbin Zhou, Zhanghua Peng, Changjun Zeng PII:

S0011-2240(16)30433-3

DOI:

10.1016/j.cryobiol.2017.04.013

Reference:

YCRYO 3843

To appear in:

Cryobiology

Received Date: 17 November 2016 Revised Date:

28 April 2017

Accepted Date: 28 April 2017

Please cite this article as: Y. Zhang, D. Dai, Y. Chang, Y. Li, M. Zhang, G. Zhou, Z. Peng, C. Zeng, Cryopreservation of boar sperm induces differential microRNAs expression, Cryobiology (2017), doi: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2017.04.013. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1

Cryopreservation of boar sperm induces differential

2

microRNAs expression

3

Yan Zhang1§, Dinghui Dai1§, Yu Chang1, Yuan Li1, Ming Zhang1, Guangbin Zhou1,

5

Zhanghua Peng2, Changjun Zeng1 *

RI PT

4

6

1. College of Animal Sciences and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu,

8

Sichuan, 611130, China

9

2. Agriculture and Forestry Bureau, Luxian County, Sichuan Province, 646100, China

M AN U

SC

7

10 11

TE D

12

§ These authors are contributed equally to this work.

14

* Correspondence author. Email: [email protected], Tel/Fax: +86-28-86291010

AC C

15

EP

13

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Abstract: Lower conception rates and litter sizes limit the wide use of artificial

17

insemination with frozen-thawed boar sperm, due to a lack of understanding of the

18

mechanisms that cause cryodamage and cryoinjury to sperm during cryopreservation.

19

CryoMiRs, a family of freeze-related microRNAs (miRNAs), are associated with

20

freeze tolerance, and regulate metabolism in mammalian hibernators and insects. Thus,

21

we speculate that miRNAs maybe involved in the regulation of the freeze-thaw

22

process and may affect boar sperm function. In this study, we studied the differential

23

expression of 46 miRNAs that have roles in spermatogenesis, sperm maturation, and

24

sperm quality in response to cryopreservation (with or without 3% glycerol). The

25

results indicated that, in response to cryopreservation with 3% glycerol, 14 miRNAs

26

were significantly up-regulated, but only two miRNAs (miR-22 and miR-450b-5p)

27

were significantly down-regulated, relative to fresh sperm. Preservation with 3%

28

glycerol caused up-regulation of 17 miRNAs, but only caused down-regulation of one

29

miRNA (miR-24), relative to sperm cryopreserved without glycerol. Functional

30

annotations of these differentially expressed miRNAs indicated that these miRNAs

31

and their targets are mainly associated with metabolic and cellular processes.

32

Therefore, our findings show that cryopreservation results in changes in miRNA

33

expression, and suggest that the anti-freeze mechanisms of boar sperm need to be

34

studied further.

35

Keywords: Boar; Sperm; Cryopreservation; Freeze tolerance; miRNAs

36

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

16

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 37

Introduction In the past few decades, the use of artificial insemination (AI) has significantly

39

increased in the pork industry, and AI is now of great economic value to this industry.

40

Nowadays, more than 99% of AIs are conducted using liquid-stored semen incubated

41

at 15-20°C for 0~5 days. However, no more than 1% of AI procedures use

42

frozen-thawed semen, due to the reduced conception rate and litter size associated

43

with freeze-thawing semen, which is mainly attributed to sperm structural and

44

functional cryoinjury during cryopreservation [29]. Numerous studies have

45

demonstrated that cryopreservation of sperm decreases viability and motility, changes

46

sperm cholesterol content,increases the number of sperm that undergo acrosome

47

reaction [40], damages the plasma and mitochondrial membranes [41, 46], increases

48

apoptosis [59], causes DNA fragmentation [46], and produces reactive oxygen species

49

(ROS) that can cause lipid peroxidation [11]. Although substantial research has focused on

50

boar spermatozoa cryopreservation, it remains unclear whether miRNAs are involved in the

51

functional regulation of spermatozoa response to cryopreservation.

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

38

Mammalian hibernators and insects can resist cold temperatures and survive

53

under extreme environmental conditions by depressing their metabolic rate, a process

54

called hypometabolism. During mammalian hibernation, transcription and translation

55

of genes associated with energy consumption are inhibited [18, 45]. However, the

56

over-expression of some genes involved in glycolysis, fatty acid metabolism,

57

gluconeogenesis, amino acid metabolism, and other metabolic pathways contributes

58

to the organism’s long-term survival at low temperature [7, 56]. A recently discovered

AC C

52

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT family of miRNAs called CryomiRs are rapidly emerging as a potential modulators of

60

cold tolerance in animals that can withstand freezing [34, 39]. In freeze-tolerant

61

mammals and insects, miRNAs can rapidly regulate metabolism-related genes and

62

signaling pathways, and inhibit ATP metabolism to help the animal adapt to extreme

63

environmental conditions [4]. Changes in miR-21 and miR-16 expression in response

64

to freeze stress indicate that these miRNAs play important roles in regulation of the

65

cell-cycle and apoptosis [4]. A target gene of miR-195, fatty acid synthase (FAS),

66

which is involved in fatty acid biosynthesis, was shown to be down-regulated in the

67

liver of hibernating thirteen-lined squirrels [33]. Furthermore, miRNAs are also

68

widely involved in the regulation of lipid and glucose metabolism, and in cholesterol

69

homeostasis in mammalian hibernators [34]. Three miRNAs (miR-26a, miR-126, and

70

miR-217) can regulate PTEN expression in the wood frog and could potentially

71

contribute to Akt-mediated inhibition of apoptosis during freezing [62]. Therefore, the

72

key mechanisms of freeze tolerance and metabolic regulator may be associated with

73

the reversible phosphorylation control of metabolic enzymes and miRNAs control of

74

gene transcript expression[50].

SC

M AN U

TE D

EP

AC C

75

RI PT

59

One potential explanation for sperm cryoinjury is as follows: during sperm

76

cryopreservation, loss of membrane integrity causes loss of ATP and Mg2+, which

77

decreases the intracellular concentration of ATP and increases the AMP/ADP

78

concentration [21]. In contrast, McLaughlin et al. reported that decreased ATP

79

production does not contribute to the poor motility of cryopreserved spermatozoa [42].

80

Additionally, decreased cell growth, differentiation, proliferation, and mRNA

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT translation during cryopreservation reduces consumption of ATP. Thus, miRNAs

82

likely play a critical role in the regulation of sperm mRNA expression during

83

cryopreservation. Although miRNAs are thought to be involved in metabolic

84

depression and are differentially expressed in mammalian hibernators and insects, it is

85

not known if miRNAs participate in freeze protection or freeze tolerance during boar

86

sperm cryopreservation. Our previous study showed that some miRNAs are

87

differentially expressed between fresh and frozen boar sperm [63]. Therefore, we

88

speculated that freeze-tolerance related miRNAs (CryomiRs) may exist in boar sperm,

89

and may regulate carbohydrate, lipid, and cholesterol metabolism during sperm

90

cryopreservation. Here, 46 candidate miRNAs were selected to detect their expression

91

changes in response to cryopreservation. Furthermore, the predicted target genes of

92

differentially expressed miRNAs involved in DNA repair and apoptosis were further

93

evaluated.

94

Materials and methods

95

Animal ethics statement

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

81

Semen collection and treatment were conducted according to the Regulations of

97

the Administration of Affairs Concerning Experimental Animals (Ministry of Science

98

and Technology, China, revised in June 2004) and approved by the Institutional

99

Animal Care and Use Committee in the College of Animal Science and Technology,

100

Sichuan Agricultural University, Sichuan, China, under permit No. DKYB20081003.

101

Furthermore, all experimental protocols were approved by the College of Animal

102

Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University.

AC C

96

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 103

Sperm collection and cryopreservation The sperm-rich fractions of ejaculates were collected from Landrace boars (N=5)

105

using a manual collection method [30]. Sperm quality parameters were measured with

106

a sperm quality analyzer, SQA-V (MES, Israel). Only sperm with normal morphology,

107

motility greater than 0.8, and a concentration higher than 1×108 were used.

RI PT

104

Firstly, all fresh ejaculates were divided into one of three treatment groups: (I)

109

fresh sperm, directly used to extract total RNA; (II) cryopreserved sperm without

110

glycerol, which underwent a freezing program; and (III) cryopreserved sperm with

111

3% glycerol, which underwent the same freezing program. The boar sperm freezing

112

program was performed according to a previous protocol [13, 61]. Briefly, the semen

113

were diluted (1:1 v/v) with Beltsville Thawing Solution and cooled slowly to 15°C for

114

2 hrs. Then, the sperm pellet was diluted to a concentration of 2×109 mL-1 using

115

lactose-egg yolk (LEY) extender and slowly cooled to 4°C for 2 hrs in the refrigerator.

116

At 4°C, sperm were further diluted with a second freezing extender (LEY

117

supplemented with glycerol) to yield final concentration of 3% glycerol. Finally, the

118

mixtures were packaged into 0.25 mL straws (FHK, Japan) and frozen using a

119

controlled-rate freezing instrument (CryoMed Controlled-Rate Freezer, Thermo

120

Fisher, USA) and then stored at -196°C.

121

miRNA extraction and cDNA synthesis

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

108

122

miRNAs were isolated using a mirVana miRNA Isolation Kit (Ambion, USA)

123

based on a previous protocol [63]. First, to eliminate somatic cell contamination, the

124

sperm pellet was suspended in a cold hypotonic solution with 0.5% Triton X-100

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 125

(Roche,

126

manufacturer's instructions. Finally, the concentration and quality of the miRNAs

127

were determined using a NanoDrop ND1000 spectrophotometer (NanoDrop

128

Technologies, USA).

Then,

miRNAs

were

extracted

according

to

the

RI PT

Germany)[47].

MiRNA first-strand cDNAs were synthesized from 0.06 µg of miRNA from each

130

sample using the PrimeScript miRNA qPCR Starter Kit version 2.0 (Takara Biotech,

131

China) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Subsequently, the cDNA was

132

stored at -20°C till use.

133

Primer design and RT-qPCR analysis

M AN U

SC

129

All primers of selected 46 miRNAs were designed according to previous reports

135

(Table 1), and were selected for study based on reported associations with

136

spermatogenesis, sperm maturation, and sperm quality parameters [15, 16, 22, 36, 37].

137

Relative miRNA expression was evaluated using Quantitative RT-PCR (RT-qPCR).

138

Sperm miRNA expression levels were normalized to endogenous ssc-miR-27a-3p

139

[63]. RT-qPCR was performed using SYBR PrimeScript miRNA RT-PCR Kit (Takara

140

Biotech, China) on a StepOnePlus real-time PCR system (Applied BioSystems, USA)

141

using an annealing temperature of 60°C, according to our laboratory’s protocols [63].

142

Target prediction of differentially expressed miRNAs

EP

AC C

143

TE D

134

To date, a relatively small number of porcine miRNAs and predicted target

144

mRNAs have been identified [15]. In order to further understand the functions of

145

differentially expressed miRNAs between all treatment conditions, putative targets

146

were

predicted

using

miRWalk

database

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT (http://zmf.umm.uni-heidelberg.de/apps/zmf/mirwalk/micrornapredictedtarget.html).

148

miRWalk combines several independent target prediction tools, including TargetScan

149

[35], miRanda [28], picTar [31], and miRWalk [16]. Then, PANTHER

150

(http://www.pantherdb.org) and DAVID (https://david.ncifcrf.org) were used to

151

explore the gene ontology and KEGG pathways of predicted target mRNAs.

RI PT

147

Seven of the predicted mRNA targets (Fas, Bcl-2, BRCA1, H2AFX, PTEN, API5,

153

TP53) that are known to be involved in sperm DNA repair and apoptosis were

154

selected for further study with RT-qPCR (Table 2, 3). All primers were designed with

155

homologous counterparts in the GenBank Database using Premier Primer 5.0 software

156

and cited from previous literature. GAPDH was used as a reference gene [61].

157

Total RNA isolation and RT-qPCR analysis

M AN U

SC

152

Total RNA from frozen-thawed boar sperm was extracted using a TRIzol LS

159

Reagent kit (Invitrogen, USA). Briefly, the straws were thawed rapidly in a water bath

160

at 37°C for 40 seconds. The sperm were resuspended in 1 mL of cold hypotonic

161

solution with 0.5% Triton X-100 to remove somatic contaminations [47]. The quality

162

of the total RNA was assessed using a NanoDrop ND1000 spectrophotometer

163

(NanoDrop Technologies, USA).

EP

AC C

164

TE D

158

cDNA was synthesized from 1 µg of total RNA from each sample using a

165

PrimeScript RT-PCR kit (Takara Biotech, Dalian, China) according to the

166

manufacturer’s protocol. RT-qPCR was performed using SYBR Premix Ex Taq II

167

(TaRaKa Biotech, China) on a StepOnePlus real-time PCR system (Applied

168

BioSystems, USA) using an annealing temperature of 61.6°C according to our

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 169

laboratory’s protocols [61].

170

Statistical analysis The average cycle threshold (Ct) value for each triplicate of RT-qPCR was used to

172

calculate relative mRNA expression levels using the 2-∆∆Ct method [38]. Statistical

173

analysis of the relative expression levels of miRNAs and predicted target mRNAs was

174

performed using Tukey's HSD (honest significant difference) test using SAS9.0

175

software. Each experiment was independently conducted three times. Differences of P

176

< 0.05 were regarded as statistically significant.

177

Results

178

Differential miRNA expression between fresh and cryopreserved sperm

M AN U

SC

RI PT

171

The relative expression levels of 46 miRNAs across the three treatment conditions

180

(fresh sperm, sperm cryopreserved without glycerol, and sperm cryopreserved with

181

3% glycerol) are shown in Fig. 1. The results indicated that 23 miRNAs were

182

differentially expressed across the three treatments (P<0.05) (Fig. 2). Seven miRNAs

183

(miR-34c, miR-124, miR-181a, miR-186, miR-224, miR-450b-5p, and miR-450c-5p)

184

were down-regulated and two miRNAs (miR-98 and miR-374a) were significantly

185

up-regulated in sperm cryopreserved without glycerol relative to fresh sperm.

186

Fourteen miRNAs (let-7a, let-7c, let-7d, let-7e, let-7f-5p, let-7i, miR-9-5p, miR-26a,

187

miR-98,

188

significantly up-regulated, but only two miRNAs (miR-22 and miR-450b-5p) were

189

significantly down-regulated in sperm cryopreserved with 3% glycerol relative to

190

fresh sperm (P<0.05). Interestingly, seventeen miRNAs were significantly

AC C

EP

TE D

179

miR-181a,

miR-186,

miR-212,

miR-374a-5p,

miR-374b-5p)

were

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 191

up-regulated, but only one miR (miR-24) was significantly down-regulated between

192

cryopreserved sperm with or without 3% glycerol (P<0.05). GO and KEGG pathway analysis of these differentially expressed miRNAs’

194

predicted mRNA targets indicated that these target mRNAs play important roles in

195

biological processes (metabolic processes, cell processes, and biological regulation),

196

molecular functions (binding and catalytic activity), and cell components (cell part,

197

organelles, and membranes). These genes are mainly involved in the following

198

pathways: cancer, MAPK signaling pathways, focal adhesion, and regulation of the

199

actin cytoskeleton (Fig. 5).

200

Relationship between differentially expressed miRNAs and their mRNA

201

targets known to be involved in sperm DNA repair and apoptosis

M AN U

SC

RI PT

193

RT-qPCR results indicated that, except for PTEN, the relative expression levels

203

of six genes (Fas, Bcl-2, BRCA1, H2AFX, API5, and TP53) were significantly

204

different between fresh sperm and sperm cryopreserved with 3% glycerol (P<0.05).

205

There was no significant difference in the relative expression levels of Fas, Bcl-2,

206

BRCA1, API5, or TP53 between sperm cryopreserved without glycerol and sperm

207

cryopreserved with 3% glycerol. Only H2AFX expression differed between all three

208

treatments (P<0.05). Furthermore, no significant difference in PTEN expression was

209

found among the three treatments (Fig. 3).

AC C

EP

TE D

202

210

Based on previous studies and target gene prediction tools, we decided to further

211

evaluate the relationship between miRNAs and their predicted target genes which are

212

involved in sperm apoptosis and DNA repair (Fig. 4). Our results showed that the

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT expression levels of let-7 family members are significantly higher in sperm

214

cryopreserved with 3% glycerol relative to the other two treatments (P<0.05). The

215

expression of miR-98 is significantly higher in both cryopreserved treatments relative

216

to fresh sperm (P<0.05). Interestingly, the expression of their common target gene,

217

Fas, was significantly higher in fresh sperm than in the cryopreserved treatment

218

conditions (Fig. 4A). The expression of PTEN is higher in the cryopreserved sperm

219

than in fresh sperm (Fig. 4B). Meanwhile, the expression pattern of miR-22 in fresh

220

and cryopreserved sperm is the opposite of PTEN’s expression pattern. These results

221

are consistent with the fact that miRNAs degrade or translationally silence their target

222

mRNAs. Similarly, the expression level of Bcl-2, an anti-apoptotic gene, is also

223

consistent with the changes we observe in miR-98 expression, but not miR-34c (Fig.

224

4C). There were no significant differences in the expression levels of miR-182,

225

miR-34c, miR-504-5p, and miR-244 and their target genes (BRCA1, API and TP53) in

226

the cryopreserved sperm, with or without 3% glycerol (Fig. 4D-4F). The expression

227

level of miR-24 and its target gene, H2AFX, was significantly higher in the sperm

228

cryopreserved without glycerol than in 3% glycerol condition (Fig. 4G).

229

Discussion

SC

M AN U

TE D

EP

AC C

230

RI PT

213

It is generally accepted that nuclear-encoded protein translation is unlikely to

231

occur in mature sperm cells and translational repression is essential for spermatid

232

differentiation. However, Gur and Breitbart [23] have demonstrated that nuclear genes

233

are expressed as proteins in sperm. Although ejaculated sperm are capable of using

234

mRNAs transcripts for protein translation during the final maturation steps before

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT fertilization, the mechanism is presently still unknown [24]. During sperm

236

cryopreservation, some epigenetic-related mRNA (Dnmt3a, Dnmt3b, Jhdm2a, Kat8,

237

Prm1, Prm2 and IGF2) and low protein levels were typically found in sperm after

238

freeze-thawing [60]. miRNAs are critical regulators of mRNA expression, which

239

inhibit translation of target mRNA or induce mRNA degradation [25]. The process of

240

cryopreservation not only induces expression of apoptosis-related mRNAs [59], but

241

also changes miRNA expression [63]. In the present study, we found miR-98 and

242

miR-374a to be up-regulated, and seven miRNAs (miR-34c, miR-124, miR-181a,

243

miR-186, miR-224, miR-450b-5p, and miR-450c-5p) to be down-regulated in

244

cryopreserved sperm (without glycerol) relative to fresh sperm. This further

245

demonstrated that the freeze-thaw process changes miRNA expression. Seventeen

246

miRNAs were significantly up-regulated, but only miR-24 was significantly

247

down-regulated, with the addition of cryoprotectants (3% glycerol) relative to

248

freezing without cryoprotectants. Recently, 83 miRNAs were differentially expressed

249

in high and low motile post-thaw bovine sperm, and let-7a and miR-26a are

250

up-regulated in high motile sperm [10]. Likewise, let-7a and miR-26a are also

251

significantly up-regulated in cryopreserved boar sperm with 3% glycerol compared

252

with cryopreserved boar sperm without 3% glycerol.

SC

M AN U

TE D

EP

AC C

253

RI PT

235

CryomiRs (cold-modulated miRNAs), as key regulators of freeze tolerance in

254

cold-tolerant insects and hibernating mammals, control the reversible phosphorylation

255

of metabolic enzymes, thereby reducing energetic consumption, and gene transcript

256

expression [39, 49, 50]. Fatty acid synthase (FAS), an enzyme involved in fatty acid

257

biosynthesis and a putative miR-195 target, is down-regulated in hibernating

258

squirrels’ livers [33]. Furthermore, miR-29a and miR-233 and their target mRNAs

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 259

could also regulate glycolysis or glucose metabolism in these cold-tolerant vertebrates

260

[4, 34]. Under freezing stress conditions, three miRNAs (miR-26a, miR-126, and

261

miR-217) can regulate PTEN expression via activation of AKT pathways to inhibit

262

apoptosis [62]. Based on these enlightening findings, we postulated that miRNAs were probably

264

associated with anti-freeze, anti-apoptosis, and energy consumption regulation

265

mechanisms during sperm cryopreservation. It is well known that the cellular

266

metabolic activity decreases during cryopreservation, followed by irreversible

267

cryoinjury [58]. During cryopreservation, intracellular ice crystal formation leads to

268

cryodamage of the sperm plasma membrane and mitochondrial or nuclear DNA,

269

which causes apoptotic changes and a severe decline in sperm quality [27, 58].

270

Furthermore, gene transcription and protein translation associated with energy

271

consumption are inhibited at low temperature [18, 45]. In this study, gene ontology

272

analysis of differentially expressed miRNAs’ predicted mRNA targets showed that

273

these targets are mainly involved in metabolic processes, cell processes, and

274

biological regulation, and play important roles in binding and catalytic activities (Fig.

275

5). It was reported that the PTEN/PI3K/Akt signaling pathway is involved in cellular

276

processes such as glucose metabolism, cell cycle regulation, and protein translation

277

under conditions of environmental stresses [1, 17]. For instance, miR-29a and

278

miR-233 are involved in glucose metabolism in wood frogs and hibernating

279

thirteen-lined ground squirrels [4, 33]. MiR-195 is associated with lipid metabolism in

280

mammalian hibernators [34]. Via targeting of IDH1, miR-181a decreases expression

281

of lipid synthesis-related genes and increases expression of genes involved in

282

β-oxidation [12]. In the present study, we found that miR-181a expression was

283

up-regulated in sperm cryopreserved with 3% glycerol, but down-regulated in sperm

284

cryopreserved without glycerol, which is consistent with the superior cryoprotective

285

effects of glycerol. Furthermore, miR-22, miR-24, and miR-182 targets are thought to

286

be associated with sperm structure and motility [2, 26, 52]. Thus, the process of

287

freeze-thaw influences miRNA expression and results in abnormal sperm morphology,

288

motility, and fertility. Furthermore, it was suggested that glycerol provides better

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

263

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 289

cryoprotective effects due to the different miRNA expression profile of sperm

290

cryopreserved with or without 3% glycerol. However, the molecular mechanism of

291

cryoprotection during sperm cryopreservation requires further study. The association between miRNAs’ predicted target mRNAs and spermatozoa

293

apoptosis and DNA damage was explored further. Apoptosis (programed cell death) is

294

a physiological mechanism required for organic function and tissue development and

295

is also necessary to dismantle and engulf damaged cells that represent a threat to the

296

integrity of the organism. Previous studies have revealed that sperm also undergo

297

apoptotic changes during cryopreservation [9, 59]. In this study, we used RT-qPCR to

298

assay the expression of seven DNA repair and apoptosis-related genes (Fas, Bcl-2,

299

BRCA1, H2AFX, API5, TP53, PTEN) that are thought to be target genes of the

300

freeze-related miRNAs that we identified. The Fas-Fas ligand (FasL) pathway is a

301

major death receptor-signaling pathway. Binding of FasL to Fas induces activation of

302

caspase-8 and triggers apoptosis [59]. Fas is a direct target of the let-7/miR-98 family.

303

Let-7 and miR-98 expression levels are significantly lower in fresh sperm than in

304

sperm cryopreserved with 3% glycerol, while the Fas expression profile is opposite to

305

let-7/miR-98 (P<0.05). Let-7/miR-98 expression is reduced during activation-induced

306

cell death, which is accompanied by increased Fas expression [53]. The anti-apoptotic

307

protein Bcl-2 is located mainly on the outer membrane of mitochondria. Bcl-2 can

308

prevent apoptosis by inhibiting the release of cytochrome C [57]. Bcl-2 is a target of

309

miR-34 and miR-98, and can be down-regulated by direct binding of miR-34 [5, 55].

310

BRCA1 is an E3 ubiquitin ligase that plays an essential role in DNA repair [6].

311

BRCA1 is directly targeted by miR-182, and miR-182-mediated down-regulation of

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

292

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT BRCA1 impedes DNA repair [44]. H2AFX, a key double-stranded DNA break repair

313

protein, was identified as a target of miR-24. MiR-24 binds to the 3’UTR of H2AX

314

mRNA and decreases H2AFX mRNA and protein levels, which inhibits the DNA

315

damage response and increases cell death after DNA damage [32]. Our results show

316

that miR-24 and miR-182 may impact DNA damage repair via regulation of their

317

target genes, H2AFX and BRCA1. Apoptosis inhibitor 5 (API-5), which prevents

318

apoptosis after growth factor deprivation, is targeted by miR-224, and plays a role in

319

sensitizing cells to apoptosis in hepatocellular carcinoma patients [54]. Freeze

320

extension with 3% glycerol attenuates apoptosis better than sperm cryopreservation

321

without glycerol. In this study, the expression level of API-5 in sperm cryopreserved

322

with 3% glycerol is lower than that in sperm cryopreserved without glycerol. This

323

result is consistent with the higher expression of miR-224 that we observed in sperm

324

cryopreserved with 3% glycerol relative to sperm preserved without glycerol. Studies

325

suggest that members of the miR-34 family are direct p53 targets, which regulates

326

apoptosis [48]. MiR-34a is a direct p53-target gene and p53-dependent induction of

327

miR-34a expression occurs after DNA damage [51]. Notably, inactivation of miR-34a

328

strongly attenuates p53-mediated apoptosis in cells exposed to genotoxic stress,

329

whereas over expression of miR-34a mildly increases apoptosis [48]. Our results

330

show that TP53 expression is significant lower in cryopreserved sperm than in fresh

331

sperm, which is not consistent with the changes in miR-34c and miR-504-5p

332

expression in the three treatments. Furthermore, PTEN is targeted by miR-22 and

333

miR-26 through a specific miR-binding site in the PTEN 3’ UTR [3, 19]. However, in

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

312

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT our study, we observed no significant difference in PTEN expression among the three

335

treatments, which suggests that PTEN may be regulated by miR-22 and miR-26a in

336

the boar sperm. Likewise, The result of cryopreserved bull high- and low-motile

337

sperm also showed that PTEN could be targeted by the simultaneous action of

338

miR-17-5p, miR-26a-5p, miR-486-5p [64].

339

Conclusion

RI PT

334

In this study, 23 miRNAs associated with processes of energy metabolism,

341

sperm structure, motility, and apoptosis were differentially expressed during boar

342

sperm cryopreservation. Putative target transcripts of differentially expressed

343

miRNAs encode proteins that are critical for spermatozoa metabolic processes and

344

cellular process. Together, our findings suggest miRNAs are widely associated with

345

the process of boar sperm freeze-thaw. These findings will further our understanding

346

of cryoinjury, freeze tolerance, and antifreeze mechanisms of sperm cryopreservation.

347

Acknowledgements

350

M AN U

TE D

EP

349

This work is supported by a grant from National Natural Science Foundation of China (NO. 31570533).

AC C

348

SC

340

351

Reference

352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359

[1] K. Abnous, C.A. Dieni, K.B. Storey, Regulation of Akt during hibernation in Richardson's ground squirrels, BBA-Gen Subjects, 1780 (2008) 185-193. [2] J.C. Adams, Roles of fascin in cell adhesion and motility, Curr. Opin. Cell Biol., 16 (2004) 590-596. [3] N. Bar, R. Dikstein, miR-22 forms a regulatory loop in PTEN/AKT pathway and modulates signaling kinetics, PLoS One, 5 (2010) e10859. [4] K.K. Biggar, A. Dubuc, K. Storey, MicroRNA regulation below zero: differential expression of miRNA-21 and miRNA-16 during freezing in wood frogs, Cryobiology, 59 (2009) 317-321.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT [5] G.T. Bommer, I. Gerin, Y. Feng, A.J. Kaczorowski, R. Kuick, R.E. Love, Y. Zhai, T.J. Giordano, Z.S. Qin, B.B. Moore, p53-mediated activation of miRNA34 candidate tumor-suppressor genes, Curr. Biol., 17 (2007) 1298-1307. [6] S. Boulton, Cellular functions of the BRCA tumour-suppressor proteins, Biochem. Soc. Trans., 34 (2006) 633-645. [7] K.M. Brauch, N.D. Dhruv, E.A. Hanse, M.T. Andrews, Digital transcriptome analysis indicates adaptive mechanisms in the heart of a hibernating mammal, Physiol. Genomics, 23 (2005) 227-234.

RI PT

[8] J.J. Bromfield, Seminal fluid and reproduction: much more than previously thought, J. Assist. Reprod. Genet., 31 (2014) 627-636.

[9] A. Brum, K. Sabeur, B. Ball, Apoptotic-like changes in equine spermatozoa separated by density-gradient centrifugation or after cryopreservation, Theriogenology, 69 (2008) 1041-1055.

[10] E. Capra, F. Turri, B. Lazzari, P. Cremonesi, T.M. Gliozzi, I. Fojadelli, A. Stella, F. Pizzi, Small

SC

RNA sequencing of cryopreserved semen from single bull revealed altered miRNAs and piRNAs expression between High- and Low-motile sperm populations, BMC Genomics, 18 (2017) 14. [11] E. Chabory, C. Damon, A. Lenoir, G. Kauselmann, H. Kern, B. Zevnik, C. Garrel, F. Saez, R. Cadet, J. Henry-Berger, Epididymis seleno-independent glutathione peroxidase 5 maintains sperm

M AN U

DNA integrity in mice, J. Clin. Invest., 119 (2009) 2074-2085.

[12] S. Chatterjee, C. Gagnon, Production of reactive oxygen species by spermatozoa undergoing cooling, freezing, and thawing, Mol. Reprod. Dev., 59 (2001) 451-458.

[13] B. Chu, T. Wu, L. Miao, Y. Mei, M. Wu, MiR-181a regulates lipid metabolism via IDH1, Sci. Rep., 5 (2015).

[14] A. Cordova, J. Perez, B. Lleo, C.G. Artiga, S.M. Rillo, In vitro fertilizing capacity of deep frozen boar semen packaged in 0.5 and 5 ml straws, Reprod. Domest. Anim., 36 (2001) 199-202.

TE D

[15] E. Curry, S. Ellis, S. Pratt, Detection of porcine sperm microRNAs using a heterologous microRNA microarray and reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction, Mol. Reprod. Dev., 76 (2009) 218-219.

[16] E. Curry, T.J. Safranski, S.L. Pratt, Differential expression of porcine sperm microRNAs and their association with sperm morphology and motility, Theriogenology, 76 (2011) 1532-1539.

EP

[17] H. Dweep, C. Sticht, P. Pandey, N. Gretz, miRWalk–database: prediction of possible miRNA binding sites by “walking” the genes of three genomes, J. Biomed. Inform., 44 (2011) 839-847. [18] S.F. Eddy, K.B. Storey, Differential expression of Akt, PPARγ, and PGC-1 during hibernation in bats, Biochem. Cell Biol., 81 (2003) 269-274.

AC C

360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403

[19] K.U. Frerichs, C.B. Smith, M. Brenner, D.J. DeGracia, G.S. Krause, L. Marrone, T.E. Dever, J.M. Hallenbeck, Suppression of protein synthesis in brain during hibernation involves inhibition of protein initiation and elongation, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 95 (1998) 14511-14516. [20] J. Gao, Q.-G. Liu, The role of miR-26 in tumors and normal tissues (Review), Oncol. Lett., 2 (2011) 1019-1023.

[21] H. Glander, Sperm metabolism, sperm vitality and cryopreservation, Zentralbl. Gynakol., 106 (1983) 892-899. [22] Y. Gu, M. Li, K. Zhang, L. Chen, A.a. JIANG, J. Wang, X. Lv, X. Li, Identification of suitable endogenous control microRNA genes in normal pig tissues, Anim. Sci. J., 82 (2011) 722-728. [23] Y. Gur, H. Breitbart, Mammalian sperm translate nuclear-encoded proteins by mitochondrial-type ribosomes, Genes Dev., 20 (2006) 411-416. [24] Y. Gur, H. Breitbart, Protein synthesis in sperm: dialog between mitochondria and cytoplasm, Mol.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Cell. Endocrinol., 282 (2008) 45-55. [25] M. Ha, V.N. Kim, Regulation of microRNA biogenesis, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Bio., 15 (2014) 509-524. [26] G. Haidl, A. Becker, R. Henkel, Poor development of outer dense fibres as a major cause of tail abnormalities in the spermatozoa of asthenoteratozoospermic men, Hum. Reprod., 6 (1991) 1431-1438. [27] E. Isachenko, V. Isachenko, I.I. Katkov, S. Dessole, F. Nawroth, Vitrification of mammalian spermatozoa in the absence of cryoprotectants: from past practical difficulties to present success,

RI PT

Reprod. Biomed. Online, 6 (2003) 191-200.

[28] B. John, A.J. Enright, A. Aravin, T. Tuschl, C. Sander, D.S. Marks, Human microRNA targets, PLoS Biol., 2 (2004) e363.

[29] T. Khalifa, C. Rekkas, F. Samartzi, A. Lymberopoulos, K. Kousenidis, T. Dovenski, Highlights on artificial insemination (AI) technology in the pigs, Mac. Vet. Rev, 37 (2014) 5-34.

SC

[30] G. King, J. Macpherson, A comparison of two methods for boar semen collection,J. Anim. Sci., 36 (1973) 563-565.

[31] A. Krek, D. Grün, M.N. Poy, R. Wolf, L. Rosenberg, E.J. Epstein, P. MacMenamin, I. da Piedade, K.C. Gunsalus, M. Stoffel, Combinatorial microRNA target predictions, Nat. Genet., 37 (2005)

M AN U

495-500.

[32] A. Lal, Y. Pan, F. Navarro, D.M. Dykxhoorn, L. Moreau, E. Meire, Z. Bentwich, J. Lieberman, D. Chowdhury, miR-24–mediated downregulation of H2AX suppresses DNA repair in terminally differentiated blood cells, Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol., 16 (2009) 492-498.

[33] D. Lang-Ouellette, Differential expression of miRNAs with metabolic implications in hibernating thirteen-lined ground squirrels, Ictidomys tridecemlineatus, Mol. Cell. Biochem., 394 (2014) 291-298. [34] D. Lang-Ouellette, T. Richard, P. Morin Jr, Mammalian hibernation and regulation of lipid

TE D

metabolism: A focus on non-coding RNAs, Biochemistry (Moscow), 79 (2014) 1161-1171. [35] B.P. Lewis, I.-h. Shih, M.W. Jones-Rhoades, D.P. Bartel, C.B. Burge, Prediction of mammalian microRNA targets, Cell, 115 (2003) 787-798.

[36] M. Li, Y. Xia, Y. Gu, K. Zhang, Q. Lang, L. Chen, J. Guan, Z. Luo, H. Chen, Y. Li, MicroRNAome of porcine pre-and postnatal development, PLoS One, 5 (2010) e11541.

EP

[37] M. Li, Y. Liu, T. Wang, J. Guan, Z. Luo, H. Chen, X. Wang, L. Chen, J. Ma, Z. Mu, Repertoire of porcine microRNAs in adult ovary and testis by deep sequencing, Int. J. Biol. Sci., 7 (2011) 1045-1055. [38] K.J. Livak, T.D. Schmittgen, Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2− ∆∆CT method, Methods, 25 (2001) 402-408.

AC C

404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447

[39] P.J. Lyons, D. Lang-Ouellette, CryomiRs: towards the identification of a cold-associated family of microRNAs, Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part D Genomics Proteomics, 8 (2013) 358-364. [40] A. Maldjian, F. Pizzi, T. Gliozzi, S. Cerolini, P. Penny, R. Noble, Changes in sperm quality and lipid composition during cryopreservation of boar semen, Theriogenology, 63 (2005) 411-421. [41] W. Maxwell, L. Johnson, Membrane status of boar spermatozoa after cooling or cryopreservation, Theriogenology, 48 (1997) 209-219. [42] E. McLaughlin, W. Ford, M. Hull, Adenosine triphosphate and motility characteristics of fresh and cryopreserved human spermatozoa, Int. J. Androl., 17 (1994) 19-23. [43] T. Mori, D.D. Ikeda, Y. Yamaguchi, M. Unoki, NIRF/UHRF2 occupies a central position in the cell cycle network and allows coupling with the epigenetic landscape, FEBS Lett., 586 (2012) 1570-1583. [44] P. Moskwa, F.M. Buffa, Y. Pan, R. Panchakshari, P. Gottipati, R.J. Muschel, J. Beech, R.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Kulshrestha, K. Abdelmohsen, D.M. Weinstock, miR-182-mediated downregulation of BRCA1 impacts DNA repair and sensitivity to PARP inhibitors, Mol. Cell, 41 (2011) 210-220. [45] P. Osborne, B. Gao, M. Hashimoto, Determination in vivo of newly synthesized gene expression in hamsters during phases of the hibernation cycle, Jpn. J. Physiol., 54 (2004) 295-305. [46] U. Paasch, R.K. Sharma, A.K. Gupta, S. Grunewald, E.J. Mascha, A.J. Thomas, H.-J. Glander, A. Agarwal, Cryopreservation and thawing is associated with varying extent of activation of apoptotic machinery in subsets of ejaculated human spermatozoa, Biol. Reprod., 71 (2004) 1828-1837.

RI PT

[47] L.P. Rauber, Qualitative and quantitative analysis of porcine sperm transcripts and characterization of a normalized cDNA library, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, 2008.

[48] N. Raver-Shapira, E. Marciano, E. Meiri, Y. Spector, N. Rosenfeld, N. Moskovits, Z. Bentwich, M. Oren, Transcriptional activation of miR-34a contributes to p53-mediated apoptosis, Mol. Cell, 26 (2007) 731-743.

SC

[49] K.B. Storey, J.M. Storey, Freeze tolerance and intolerance as strategies of winter survival in terrestrially-hibernating amphibians, Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A Physiol., 83 (1986) 613-617. [50] K.B. Storey, J.M. Storey, Molecular biology of freezing tolerance, Compr. Physiol., DOI (2013). [51] V. Tarasov, P. Jung, B. Verdoodt, D. Lodygin, A. Epanchintsev, A. Menssen, G. Meister, H.

M AN U

Hermeking, Differential regulation of microRNAs by p53 revealed by massively parallel sequencing: miR-34a is a p53 target that induces apoptosis and G1-arrest, Cell Cycle, 6 (2007) 1586-1593. [52] S. Vijayaraghavan, J. Mohan, H. Gray, B. Khatra, D.W. Carr, A role for phosphorylation of glycogen synthase kinase-3α in bovine sperm motility regulation, Biol. Reprod., 62 (2000) 1647-1654. [53] S. Wang, Y. Tang, H. Cui, X. Zhao, X. Luo, W. Pan, X. Huang, N. Shen, Let-7/miR-98 regulate Fas and Fas-mediated apoptosis, Genes Immun., 12 (2011) 149-154.

[54] Y. Wang, A.T. Lee, J.Z. Ma, J. Wang, J. Ren, Y. Yang, E. Tantoso, K.-B. Li, L.L.J. Ooi, P. Tan,

TE D

Profiling microRNA expression in hepatocellular carcinoma reveals microRNA-224 up-regulation and apoptosis inhibitor-5 as a microRNA-224-specific target, J. Biol. Chem., 283 (2008) 13205-13215. [55] H.-F. Xia, X.-H. Jin, Z.-F. Cao, T. Shi, X. Ma, MiR-98 is involved in rat embryo implantation by targeting Bcl-xl, FEBS Lett., 588 (2014) 574-583.

[56] J. Yan, B.M. Barnes, F. Kohl, T.G. Marr, Modulation of gene expression in hibernating arctic

EP

ground squirrels, Physiol. Genomics, 32 (2008) 170-181. [57] J. Yang, X. Liu, K. Bhalla, C.N. Kim, A.M. Ibrado, J. Cai, T.-I. Peng, D.P. Jones, X. Wang, Prevention of apoptosis by Bcl-2: release of cytochrome c from mitochondria blocked, Science, 275 (1997) 1129-1132.

AC C

448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491

[58] M. Yeste, Sperm cryopreservation update: Cryodamage, markers, and factors affecting the sperm freezability in pigs, Theriogenology, 85 (2016) 47-64. [59] C. Zeng, L. He, W. Peng, L. Ding, K. Tang, D. Fang, Y. Zhang, Selection of optimal reference genes for quantitative RT-PCR studies of boar spermatozoa cryopreservation, Cryobiology, 68 (2014) 113-121.

[60] C. Zeng, W. Peng, L. Ding, L. He, Y. Zhang, D. Fang, K. Tang, A preliminary study on epigenetic changes during boar spermatozoa cryopreservation, Cryobiology, 69 (2014) 119-127. [61] C. Zeng, K. Tang, L. He, W. Peng, L. Ding, D. Fang, Y. Zhang, Effects of glycerol on apoptotic signaling pathways during boar spermatozoa cryopreservation, Cryobiology, 68 (2014) 395-404. [62] J. Zhang, K.B. Storey, Akt signaling and freezing survival in the wood frog, Rana sylvatica, BBA-Gen Subjects, 1830 (2013) 4828-4837. [63] Y. Zhang, C.-J. Zeng, L. He, L. Ding, K.-Y. Tang, W.-P. Peng, Selection of endogenous reference

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 492 493 494 495 496

microRNA genes for quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction studies of boar spermatozoa cryopreservation, Theriogenology, 83 (2015) 634-641. [64] Y. Zhou, M. Zheng, Q. Shi, L. Zhang, W. Zhen, W. Chen, Y. Zhang, An epididymis-specific secretory protein HongrES1 critically regulates sperm capacitation and male fertility, PLoS One, 3 (2008) e4106.

497

Figure Legends

499

Figure-1: Heat map of the differential expression levels of 46 selected miRNAs

500

between fresh ejaculate, sperm cryopreserved without glycerol, and sperm

501

cryopreserved with 3% glycerol.

502

Figure-2: RT-qPCR assays show that the expression of twenty-three of forty-six

503

selected miRNAs was significantly different among the three different treatments.

504

Different letters indicate statistical significance (P < 0.05).

505

Figure-3: Relative expression levels (as determined by RT-qPCR) across the three

506

treatments for seven target genes (Fas, Bcl-2, PTEN, API5, BRCA1, H2AFX and

507

TP53), which are possibly involved in sperm apoptosis and DNA repair. Different

508

letters indicate statistical significance (P < 0.05).

509

Figure-4: Comparison of the relative expression levels of miRNAs’ predicted target

510

genes in sperm across three different treatments (as determined by RT-qPCR). (A)

511

Fas, (B) PTEN, (C) Bcl-2, (D) BRCA1, (E) TP53, (F) API5 and (G) H2AFX. Different

512

letters indicate statistical significance (P < 0.05).

513

Figure-5: Categorization of predicted mRNA targets according to their GO terms and

514

KEGG pathways following analysis with PANTHER and DAVID online tools. (A)

515

KEGG pathways, (B) Biological process, (C) Cellular component, and (D) Molecular

516

function.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

498

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Table 1. Primers used for miRNA qRT-PCR in boar sperm.

518

Table 2. Predicted target mRNAs of differentially expressed miRNAs involved in

519

sperm apoptosis.

520

Table 3. Primers for quantification of target mRNAs that are differentially expressed

521

in boar sperm and associated with apoptosis.

522

Supplemental data 1: Relative expression level of all selected 46 miRNAs and

523

mRNAs.

524

Supplemental data 2: Melt-curve of all selected 46 miRNAs and mRNAs.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

517

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Table 1. Primers used for miRNA qRT-PCR in boar sperm.

MIMAT0013865 MIMAT0002151 MIMAT0025356 MIMAT0013866 MIMAT0002152 MIMAT0002153 MIMAT0002168 MIMAT0002125 MIMAT0007754 MIMAT0013950 MIMAT0002165 MIMAT0015709 MIMAT0002134 MIMAT0002135 MIMAT0002148 MIMAT0013870 MIMAT0013916 MIMAT0013908 MIMAT0013905 MIMAT0002116 MIMAT0002117 MIMAT0002156

TGAGGTAGTAGGTTGTATAGTT TGAGGTAGTAGGTTGTATGGTT AGAGGTAGTAGGTTGCATAGTT TGAGGTAGGAGGTTGTATAGTT TGAGGTAGTAGATTGTATAGTT TGAGGTAGTAGTTTGTGCT TCTTTGGTTATCTAGCTGTATGA TAGCAGCACATCATGGTTTACA TAGCAGCACGTAAATATTGGCG TGTGCAAATCCATGCAAAACTGA TAGCTTATCAGACTGATGTTGA AGTTCTTCAGTGGCAAGCTTTA TGGCTCAGTTCAGCAGGAACAG TTCAAGTAATCCAGGATAGGCT TTCACAGTGGCTAAGTTCCGC CTAGCACCATCTGAAATCGGTTA AGGCAGTGTAGTTAGCTGATTGC TATTGCACTTGTCCCGGCCTGT TGAGGTAGTAAGTTGTATTGTT TCAAATGCTCAGACTCCTGT TCAAATGCTCAGACTCCTTG TTAAGGCACGCGGTGAATGCCA

RI PT

ssc-let-7a ssc-let-7c ssc-let-7d-5p ssc-let-7e ssc-let-7f ssc-let-7i ssc-miR-9-1 ssc-miR-15b ssc-miR-16 ssc-miR-19b ssc-miR-21 ssc-miR-22-5p ssc-miR-24-3p ssc-miR-26a ssc-miR-27a ssc-miR-29a ssc-miR-34c ssc-miR-92a ssc-miR-98 ssc-miR-105-1 ssc-miR-105-2 ssc-miR-124a

SC

Primer sequence (5’-3’)

Amplification efficiency (%) 98.3 99.5 97.3 97.6 99.6 97.1 99.7 97.0 100.2 99.9 99.4 95.1 99.1 99.9 98.2 104.2 95.8 100.2 98.4 99.5 99.4 101.3

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

Gene name

miRBase accession

R2

0.999 0.999 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.999 0.999 0.999 0.999 0.999 0.998 1.000 1.000 0.997 1.000 0.997 0.999 0.999 1.000 0.999 0.998 1.000

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

M AN U

TE D

1.000 0.999 1.000 0.999 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.997 0.999 1.000 0.999 0.999 0.999 0.994 0.995 1.000 1.000 0.999 0.999 1.000 0.998 1.000 1.000 1.000

RI PT

96.8 99.3 98.5 99.1 99.3 99.2 99.1 99.2 100.3 100.6 96.3 100.1 97.8 100.5 95.9 98.6 101.6 95.5 96.2 98.9 98.1 100.9 98.2 95.0 97.9

SC

TAACAGTCTACAGCCATGGTCG TGAGATGAAGCACTGTAGCTC AACATTCAACGCTGTCGGTGAGTT TTTGGCAATGGTAGAACTCACACT CAAAGAATTCTCCTTTTGGGCTT CTGACCTATGAATTGACAGCC TGGAATGTAAGGAAGTGTGTGA ACCTTGGCTCTAGACTGCTTACT AGCTACATCTGGCTACTGGGTCTC CAAGTCACTAGTGGTTCCGTTTA AAAAGCTGGGTTGAGAGGGCGA CCTAGTAGGTGTTCAGTAAGTGT TTATCAGAATCTCCAGGGGTAC AATTGCACGGTATCCATCTGTAA TTATAATACAACCTGATAAGTG ATATAATACAACCTGCTAAGTG CAGCAGCAATTCATGTTTTGAA TTTTGCGATGTGTTCCTAATAT TTTTGCAATATGTTCCTGAATA TTTTGCGATGTGTTCCTAATAC TAGCAGCGGGAACAGTACTGCAG AGACCCTGGTCTGCACTCTATCT TCAACACTTGCTGGTTTCCTCT TCGGGGATCATCATGTCACGA CCGTCCTAAGGTTGTTGAGTT

EP

MIMAT0025361 MIMAT0013879 MIMAT0010191 MIMAT0025366 MIMAT0002162 MIMAT0013910 MIMAT0013864 MIMAT0025370 MIMAT0013942 MIMAT0002132 MIMAT0013878 MIMAT0002150 MIMAT0013933 MIMAT0015711 MIMAT0013913 MIMAT0013915 MIMAT0013920 MIMAT0010188 MIMAT0013927 MIMAT0015717 MIMAT0010189 MIMAT0013931 MIMAT0013961 MIMAT0013924 MIMAT0013943

AC C

ssc-miR-132 ssc-miR-143-3p ssc-miR-181a ssc-miR-182 ssc-miR-186 ssc-miR-192 ssc-miR-206 ssc-miR-212 ssc-miR-222 ssc-miR-224 ssc-miR-320 ssc-miR-325 ssc-miR-361-5p ssc-miR-363 ssc-miR-374a-5p ssc-miR-374b-5p ssc-miR-424-5p ssc-miR-450a ssc-miR-450b-5p ssc-miR-450c-5p ssc-miR-503 ssc-miR-504 ssc-miR-505 ssc-miR-542-5p ssc-miR-676-3p

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Table 2. Predicted target mRNAs of differentially expressed miRNAs involved in sperm apoptosis. Predicted target

let-7a/7c/7d/7e/7f/7i, miR-98 miR-22, miR-26 miR-24 miR-182

Fas cell surface death receptor Phosphatase and tensin homolog H2A histone family, member X Breast cancer 1, early onset

FAS PTEN H2AFX BRCA1

apoptosis tumor suppressor DNA damage response DNA damage response

miR-224 miR-34c, miR-504

Apoptosis inhibitor 5 Tumor protein p53

API5 TP53

apoptosis inhibitor apoptosis

miR-34c, miR-98

B-cell CLL/lymphoma 2

BCL2

RI PT

miRNA

Official symbol

SC

M AN U

TE D EP AC C

Encoded protein function

apoptosis inhibitor

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

Table 3. Primers for quantification of target mRNAs that are differentially expressed in boar sperm and associated with apoptosis. Product Amplification Gene Primer (5’-3’) GenBank accession R2 length (bp) efficiency (%) F: ACTCACTCTTCTACCTTTGATGCT GAPDH 100 AF017079 93.9 1.000 R: TGTTGCTGTAGCCAAATTCA F: CGTGAGGGTCAATTCTGCTGT Fas 123 NM_213839 101.5 0.995 R: CTTGTCTGTGTAATCCTCCCCC F: GGCAACCCATCCTGGCACCT Bcl-2 134 XM_003121700 100.6 0.997 R: AACTCATCGCCCGCCTCCCT F: CGAGGTCCAAAGCGAGCAA BRCA1 171 XM_013989938.1 98.3 1.000 R: ACCCTGGCGGAAGGTGAAT F: ACAACAAGAAGACGCGGATCA H2AFX 121 XM_003129950.4 100.5 0.997 R: TGGATATTGGGCAGGACGC F: GCAGAGTTGCACAGTATCCTTTCG PTEN 151 NM_001143696 96.0 0.999 R: ACACCAGTTCGTCCCTTTCCAG F: GAGGAGCTTTACCGCAACTATGG API5 102 XM_003480707 100.8 0.999 R: ACCACCTTTGACACCATCCAGTA F: TTGAGGTGCGTGTTTGTGCC TP53 120 NM_213824 100.3 1.000 R: TGGGCAGTGCTCGCTTAGTG

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

Fig.1. Heat map of the differential expression levels of 46 selected miRNAs between fresh ejaculate, sperm cryopreserved without glycerol, and sperm cryopreserved with 3% glycerol.

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

Fig.2. RT-qPCR assays show that the expression of twenty-three of forty-six selected miRNAs was significantly different among the three different treatments. Different letters indicate statistical significance (P < 0.05).

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

Fig.3. Relative expression levels (as determined by RT-qPCR) across the three treatments for seven target genes (Fas, Bcl-2, PTEN, API5, BRCA1, H2AFX and TP53), which are possibly involved in sperm apoptosis and DNA repair. Different letters indicate statistical significance (P < 0.05).

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

Fig.4. Comparison of the relative expression levels of miRNAs’ predicted target genes in sperm across three different treatments (as determined by RT-qPCR). (A) Fas, (B) PTEN, (C) Bcl-2, (D) BRCA1, (E) TP53, (F) API5 and (G) H2AFX. Different letters indicate statistical significance (P < 0.05).

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

TE D

Fig.5. Categorization of predicted mRNA targets according to their GO terms and KEGG pathways following analysis with PANTHER and DAVID online tools. (A) KEGG pathways, (B) Biological process, (C) Cellular component, and (D) Molecular function.