Crystal distortion and magnetic structure of γ-Mn(Au) alloys

Crystal distortion and magnetic structure of γ-Mn(Au) alloys

:~ ELSEVIER Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 196-197 (1999) 663-664 ~ Journalof ~ i ~ mnad gnetlsm magnetic materials Crystal distortio...

140KB Sizes 0 Downloads 39 Views

:~

ELSEVIER

Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 196-197 (1999) 663-664

~ Journalof ~ i ~ mnad gnetlsm magnetic materials

Crystal distortion and magnetic structure of 7-Mn(Au) alloys T. Hori a'*, Y. Tsuchiya b, S. Funahashi b'~, Y. Shimojo b, H. Shiraishi a, K. Hojou b, Y. N a k a g a w a c aShibaura Institute of Technology, Oomiya, Saitama 330-8570, Japan bJapan Atomic Energy Research Institute, TokaL Ibaraki 319-1106, Japan ~Tohoku Institute of Technology, Yagiyama, Sendal 982-8577, Japan

Abstract y-Mn alloys containing Au have been examined by magnetic measurements and X-ray and neutron diffraction experiments. The 9 at% Au alloy has a face centered orthorhombic lattice with a = 3.853, b = 3.794 and c = 3.731/~ at 11 K, and shows a non-collinear antiferromagnetic structure with 4 sublattices; the three-axis components of the magnetic moments are as follows:/~a = 0, #b = 1.10 and #c = 1.91 ~tB.A revised phase diagram for y-Mn(Au) alloy system with 8-16 at% Au is proposed. © 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. Keywords: Antiferromagnetism; Crystal distortion; Neutron diffraction

As is well known, most Mn-rich 7-Mn alloys undergo a distortion from the face centered cubic structure to a face centered tetragonal (FCT) structure with c/a < 1 below the N6el temperature [1]. In some cases a distortion to a FCT with c/a > 1 is also observed [2]. In the 7-Mn(Ni) alloys, there is a face centered orthorhombic (FCO) region in addition to the FCT regions with c/a < 1 and c/a > 1 [3]. Recently, the present authors [4] have found that these three regions exist in the 7-Mn(Ga) alloys, and determined a non-collinear magnetic structure with 4 sublattices for the FCO phase. The a-, b- and c-axes components of the magnetic moments, Pa, #b and Pc are as follows: #2 > / ~ > #2 = 0 in the FCO structure with a > b > c. The FCO phase of the y-Mn(Au) alloys was first reported by Cowlam et al. [5]. They made neutron diffraction experiments and assumed a simple antiferromagnetic structure, disregarding a possibility of the non-collinear structure. The phase diagram of the 7Mn(Au) alloys was determined by Harders et al. [6] on

* Corresponding author. Tel.: + 81-48-687-5162;fax: + 8148-687-5163; e-mail: [email protected]. 1present adress: Department of Technology Development ATOX Co. Ltd., 1408Takada, Kashiwa, Chiba 277-0861,Japan.

the basis of X-ray diffraction and Young's modulus measurements. In the present paper, more detailed X-ray and neutron diffraction experiments and magnetic susceptibility measurements on the 7-Mn(Au) alloys are reported. Methods of the sample preparation and magnetization measurements were similar to those described in our earlier paper [4]. The powder sample for X-ray and neutron diffraction was prepared by filing the ingot. In order to eliminate residual stress after filing, the powder sample was annealed for 2 h at 1000°C and quenched in water. Neutron diffraction experiments were made by using the HRPD and TAS II diffractometers in the JRR3M reactor at JAERI. The HRPD has a higher resolution than the TAS II. Fig. 1 shows a neutron diffraction pattern for the 9 at% Au alloy at 11 K obtained by the HRPD diffractometer (wavelength 2 = 1.823/~). The pattern can be indexed by assuming the FCO structure with a = 3.853, b = 3.794 and c = 3.731 ~ and non-collinear antiferromagnetic structure similar to that of the y-Mn(Ga) alloy [4]. The components of the magnetic moments, #a = 0, #b = 1.10 and #c = 1.91 IxB/Mn atom, were deduced from the magnetic diffraction lines 110 and 101 shown in the inset of Fig. 1. We also measured the temperature dependence of these lines using the TAS II

0304-8853/99/$ - see front matter © 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. PII: S 0 3 0 4 - 8 8 5 3 ( 9 8 ) 0 0 9 0 5 - 6

664

T. Hori et al. / Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 196-197 (1999) 663-664 6000

o ~ 3.9 | a

ot____.~ ~ 38

39

40

41

•~ "~7 / 2~ 0

:; 2000 =

.

.

~ 100

i 200

~ 300

i 400

500

I'(K~ '"

2(3

30

," a

40

1; t

/I

50 60 20 ( dog )

70

~1? 80

91)

Fig. 3. Temperature dependence of lattice constants for the ¥-Mn(Au) alloy with 9 at% Au.

Fig. 1. Neutron diffraction pattern for y-Mn(Au) alloy with 9 at% Au at 10 K (), = 1.823 A).

600,

~

400 f

7. ~

120

.6

80

-5

••••

' l [X)

"I'~

T° i° ° "

ll°n •

%

~" ~:

0 E

°''''" 4

• 2(X) 300 T IK



tI

/

f)

"" 3 ,

' t~ • C 1

I~0

In5

20

:11 ~:; ALl



., 400

" j...

2('0 I

l/Io

~-, 40 f

~;

.

3 8 .b .............. ~'~ ~ ,~ ~ " / ~ .... ~°..o°........... °°°%,.o ,,°° . i T ,

4000

[_-_-

.

500

Fig. 2. Temperature dependence o~ the 110 and 101 intensities of the neutron diffraction for 7-Mn(Au) alloy with 9 at% Au. diffractometer (2 = 2.376,~). Although the 110 and 101 reflections were not resolved, we obtained the intensities, l l l o and 1101, by curve-fitting analysis using the double Gaussian functions. The results are shown in Fig. 2. The temperature dependence of the lattice parameters a, b, and c was determined by X-ray diffraction experiments using the 200, 202 and 002 reflections. Fig. 3 shows the results for the 9 at% Au alloy, which is orthorhombic below To ( = 230 K), and tetragonal with c/a < 1 between To and Tt ( = 400 K). The neutron diffraction intensities shown in Fig. 2 are consistent with the crystal distortion; I~o~ and Ii10 vanish at To and T , respectively. The N6el temperature TN coincides with the tetragonal distortion temperature T,. The 1 2 a t % Au alloy has a cubic lattice at room temperature and distorts to a tetragonal lattice with c/a > 1 below Tt ( = 230 K). The neutron diffraction pattern at 10 K exhibits the intense 101 or 011 line without the 110 line, suggesting a simple antiferromagnetism with the magnetic m o m e n t lying on the c plane. The value of the m o m e n t determined from the 101 line intensity is 2.20 pB/Mn atom. The 101 line intensity monotonically decreases with increasing temperature up to the N6el temperature TN ( = 300 K) which is higher than the crystal distortion temperature Tt ( = 2 3 0 K ) . (There is no distinction between 101 and 110 above T,) The alloys containing more than 14 a t % Au have the cubic lattice down to 15 K. In the neutron diffraction pattern for the 15 a t % Au alloy, the 110 line with a diffuse magnetic scattering was observed up to TN ( = 150 K). A strong diffuse magnetic scattering was also observed around the 100 reflection. The magnetic mo-

Fig. 4. Phase diagram of the y-Mn(Au) alloy system. C (cubic). tl {tetragonal with c/a < lh t2 (tetragonal with c/a > 1). TN. Nbel temperature.

ment is estimated to be 0.7 laB/Mn atom at 10 K. The 110 line was not observed for the 18 at% Au alloy even at 10 K. We have determined the N6el temperature also by the magnetic susceptibility measurements. The phase boundaries of the lattice distortion have been determined mainly by the X-ray diffraction. A phase diagram for the y-Mn(Au) alloys thus obtained is shown in Fig. 4. This phase diagram is not contradictory to the results of Cowlam et al. [5], but evidently different from the phase diagram of Harders et al. [6]. Jo et al. [7] have proposed a theoretical phase diagram and magnetic structures for various y-Mn alloys on the basis of Landau expansion of the free energy. For example, the components of the magnetic moments along the three crystallographic axes/~,, lib and #c in the F C O structure with a > b > c are as follows; ~2 > #~ > #~. The results of the present experiments are consistent with this theory.

References [1] G. Bacon, L.W. Dunmur, J.H. Smith, R. Street, Proc. Soc. R. London A 241 (1957) 223. [2] H. Uchishiba, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 31 (1971) 436. [3] N. Honda, Y. Tanji, Y. Nakagawa, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 41 (1976) 1931. [4] T. Hori, Y. Morii, S. Funahashi, H. Niida, M. Akimitsu, Y. Nakagawm Physica B 213 & 214 (1995) 354. [5] N. Cowlam, G.Y.M. Al-Shahery, Physica B 86-88 (1977) 267. [6] T.M. Harders, J.H. Smith, E.R. Vance, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 15-18 (1980) 1177. [7] T. Jo, K. Hirai, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 55 (1986) 1614.