- Email: [email protected]
Current research in biotechnology: Exploring the biotech forefront
CRBIOT-00005; No of Pages 7 Current Research in Biotechnology xxx (xxxx) xxx
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Current Research in Biotechnology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/crbiot
Q4 Q3
F
O
R O
a
Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Applied Oral Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China Institute of Molecular Biology “Roumen Tsanev”, Department of Biochemical Pharmacology and Drug Design, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Acad. G. Bonchev Str., Bl. 21, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria c Pharmaceutical Institute, University of Bonn, An der Immenburg 4, 53121 Bonn, Germany d Department of Chemistry and Biotechnology, ERA Chair of Green Chemistry, Tallinn University of Technology, 12618 Tallinn, Estonia e Department of Biochemistry, Institute of Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221 005, India f NanoBioCel Group, Laboratory of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, Paseo de la Universidad 7, 01006 Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain g Biomedical Research Networking Centre in Bioengineering, Biomaterials and Nanomedicine (CIBER-BBN), Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain h University Institute for Regenerative Medicine and Oral Implantology - UIRMI (UPV/EHU-Fundación Eduardo Anitua), Vitoria, Spain i Institute of Analytical Chemistry and Radiochemistry, Leopold-Franzens University of Innsbruck, Austria j Austrian Drug Screening Institute - ADSI, CCB—Center of Chemistry and Biomedicine, Innsbruck, Austria k Neuroimmunology and Neurochemistry Research Group, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany l Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine, Bradenton, FL, USA m Department of Pharmaceutical Biology, Institute of Pharmacy and Biochemistry, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany n Institute of Chinese Medical Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Quality Research in Chinese Medicine, University of Macau, Macau, China o National Institute for Agricultural and Veterinary Research (INIAV), Vila do Conde, Portugal p Center for Study in Animal Science (CECA), ICETA, University of Porto, Oporto, Portugal q Institute of Food Sciences, National Research Council, Avellino, Italy r Department of Pharmacy, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy s Nutrition and Food Science Group, Dept. of Analytical and Food Chemistry, CITACA, CACTI, University of Vigo, Vigo Campus, Vigo, Spain t Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy u Department of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey v Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Catania, Catania, Italy w Research Group ‘Pharmacognosy and Phytotherapy’, UCL School of Pharmacy, London, UK x Inflammation Research Center, San Diego, CA, USA y Department of Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea z Department of Hypertension, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland aa Department of Ecogenomics and Systems Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria ab Vienna Metabolomics Center, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria ac Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Department of Pharmacognosy, University of Graz, Graz, Austria ad Department of Biology, The University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA ae Department of Biomolecular Sciences, The Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel af Cell Biology, Biocenter, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria ag Austrian Drug Screening Institute-ADSI, Innsbruck, Austria ah School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Geneva, University of Lausanne, Geneva, Switzerland ai Natural Products Laboratory, Institute of Biology, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands aj Allelopathy Group, Department of Organic Chemistry, Institute of Biomolecules (INBIO), Campus de Excelencia Internacional (ceiA3), School of Science, University of Cadiz, Cadiz, Spain ak Institute of Pharmacy and Molecular Biotechnology, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany al Helmholtz-Center for Infection Research, Department of Microbial Drugs, Braunschweig, Germany am Research Department of Pharmaceutical and Biological Chemistry, UCL School of Pharmacy, London, UK an Laboratory of Foodomics, Bioactivity and Food Analysis Department, Institute of Food Science Research CIAL (UAM-CSIC), Madrid, Spain ao Team Bio-PeroxIL, ‘Biochemistry of the Peroxisome, Inflammation and Lipid Metabolism’ (EA7270)/University Bourgogne Franche-Comté/Inserm, Dijon, France
P
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Q5 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50
b
D
9
E
8
T
7
C
6
E
5
R
4
O R
3
⁎
Andy Wai Kan Yeung a, , Nikolay T. Tzvetkov b,c, Vijai K. Gupta d, Subash C. Gupta e, Gorka Orive f,g,h, Günther K. Bonn i,j, Bernd Fiebich k, Anupam Bishayee l, Thomas Efferth m, Jianbo Xiao n, Ana Sanches Silva o,p, Gian Luigi Russo q, Maria Daglia r, Maurizio Battino s,t, Ilkay Erdogan Orhan u, Ferdinando Nicoletti v, Michael Heinrich w, Bharat Bhushan Aggarwal x, Marc Diederich y, Maciej Banach z, Wolfram Weckwerth aa,ab, Rudolf Bauer ac, George Perry ad, Edward A. Bayer ae, Lukas A. Huber af,ag, Jean-Luc Wolfender ah, Robert Verpoorte ai, Francisco A. Macias aj, Michael Wink ak, Marc Stadler al, Simon Gibbons am, Alejandro Cifuentes an, Elena Ibanez an, Gérard Lizard ao, Rolf Müller ap, ⁎⁎ Michael Ristow ar, Atanas G. Atanasov aq,as,at,
N C
Q22Q1
Current research in biotechnology: Exploring the biotech forefront
U
1
⁎ Corresponding author. ⁎⁎ Correspondence to: A.G. Atanasov, The Institute of Genetics and Animal Breeding, Polish Academy of Sciences, Jastrzębiec, 05-552 Magdalenka, Poland. E-mail addresses: [email protected], (A.W.K. Yeung), [email protected]. (A.G. Atanasov).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.crbiot.2019.08.003 2590-2628/© 2019 Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
A.W.K. Yeung et al.
51 52 53 54 55
ap aq ar as at
Current Research in Biotechnology xxx (xxxx) xxx
ThematicTranslational Unit Novel Antibiotics, German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), Braunschweig, Germany The Institute of Genetics and Animal Breeding, Polish Academy of Sciences, Jastrzębiec, 05-552 Magdalenka, Poland Institute of Translational Medicine, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Swiss Federal Institute for Technology (ETH) Zürich, Switzerland Department of Pharmacognosy, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria Institute of Neurobiology, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria
56 5 7
A R T I C L E
58 59 60 61 62 67 66 65 64 63 82 83 84 85 86 87 88
Article history: Received 28 June 2019 Received in revised form 28 August 2019 Accepted 28 August 2019 Available online xxxx
I N F O
A B S T R A C T
Biotechnology is an evolving research field that covers a broad range of topics. Here we aimed to evaluate the latest research literature, to identify prominent research themes, major contributors in terms of institutions, countries/regions, and journals. The Web of Science Core Collection online database was searched to retrieve biotechnology articles published since 2017. In total, 12,351 publications were identified and analyzed. Over 8500 institutions contributed to these biotechnology publications, with the top 5 most productive ones scattered over France, China, the United States of America, Spain, and Brazil. Over 140 countries/regions contributed to the biotechnology research literature, led by the United States of America, China, Germany, Brazil, and India. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering was the most productive journal in terms of number of publications. Metabolic engineering was among the most prevalent biotechnology study themes, and Escherichia coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae were frequently used in biotechnology investigations, including the biosynthesis of useful biomolecules, such as myo-inositol (vitamin B8), monoterpenes, adipic acid, astaxanthin, and ethanol. Nanoparticles and nanotechnology were identified too as emerging biotechnology research themes of great significance. Biotechnology continues to evolve and will remain a major driver of societal innovation and development.
R O
O
F
Keywords: Metabolic engineering Escherichia coli Saccharomyces cerevisiae Nanoparticles Nanotechnology Bioremediation
90 89
Biotechnology research covers a broad range of topics. As defined in the scopes of the journals Current Research in Biotechnology and Current Opinion in Biotechnology, major themes of biotechnology research include genetic and molecular engineering; tissue, cell, and pathway engineering; plant and animal biotechnology; food biotechnology; energy biotechnology; environmental biotechnology; analytical biotechnology; systems biology; nanobiotechnology; chemical biotechnology; medicinal and pharmaceutical biotechnology. The term biotechnology is attributed to be coined by the agricultural economist-cum-engineer Karl Erkey from Hungary, exactly 100 years ago. Karl Erkey defined biotechnology as, translated into English, “all the lines of work by which products are produced from raw materials with the aid of living organisms” (Amarakoon et al., 2017; Bud, 1994). The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), an intergovernmental economic organization with 36 member countries, refined the definition of biotechnology as “application of scientific and engineering principles to the processing of materials by biological agents to provide goods and services; new biotechnology involves the use of cellular and molecular processes to solve problems or make products” (Amarakoon et al., 2017). Starting in the mid-1980s, biotechnology became a very popular word in the title of research publications, appearing in papers concerning business, industry, biomedicine, chemical engineering, agricultural sciences, and even social sciences (Kennedy, 1991). In short, biotechnology signifies a new biological approach to a wide range of industries. Biotechnology was suggested to have mainly 4 sectors, white, red, green, and blue, which represent industrial, pharmaceutical/medical, food and agriculture, and environment/marine, respectively (Barcelos et al., 2018). Two well-known examples of daily applications of biotechnology are the production of the multifunctional citric acid by fermentation with the aid of Aspergillus niger, and, to a lesser extent, Yarrowia lipolytica (Karaffa and Kubicek, 2003), as well as the use of Y. lipolytica as a model for bio-oil production (Beopoulos et al., 2009); and the production of non-nutritive sweeteners, steviol glucosides and mogrosides, from plants Stevia rebaudiana and Siraitia grosvenorii, respectively (Pawar et al., 2013). Meanwhile, genetically-modified (GM) foods represent another biotechnology-derived aspect that significantly affects our everyday life. A survey conducted in 2002 reported that the majority of consumers were negative about GM foods, as their moral and ethical concerns about GM food consumption outweighed the benefits of better taste and lower price (Magnusson and Hursti, 2002). In 2015, however, GM crops were already grown on 180 million hectares of land in 28 countries, equivalent to
108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134
C
E
106 107
R R
104 105
O
102 103
C
100 101
N
98 99
U
96 97
135
2. Materials and methods
159
2.1. Literature search
160
In May 2019, a search was conducted through the Web of Science (WoS) Core Collection electronic database (Clarivate Analytics, Philadelphia, USA) to identify the latest biotechnology publications. The following search string was used: TOPIC = (“biotech*”). This search strategy yielded publications that mentioned the words biotech, biotechnology or their derivatives in the title, abstract, or keywords. In order to focus on contemporary biotechnology research trends, only articles published between 2017 and 2019 were included.
161
2.2. Data extraction and analysis
169
D
95
10% of total arable land worldwide (Taheri et al., 2017). While GM crops and GM foods will likely continue to flourish with the advancements in biotechnology, consumer surveys repeatedly indicate inferior consumer acceptance reflected in the lower willingness of purchasers to pay for GM foods than for non-GM foods (Colson and Rousu, 2013). Red (medical and pharmaceutical) biotechnology has witnessed important recent developments and makes strong impact on human health and disease therapies. Biotechnology has been a frontline field driving both uncovering of molecular mechanisms of diseases and identification of new molecular biomarkers and drug targets (e.g., through the use of engineered biological models with knock-out, knock-down, or overexpression of relevant proteins), as well as the identification and subsequent pharmaceutical development of therapeutics (e.g., many antibiotics, other smallmolecule natural product-derived drugs, and recombinant proteins such as antibodies and hormones) (Gartland et al., 2013). Bibliometric analyses of biotechnology literature were so far occasionally published to reflect on the evolution of the field or evaluate the contributions and performances of specific countries. For a detailed list of such studies published until 2001, readers are referred to Table 1 of the work published in 2002 by Dalpé (Dalpé, 2002). In this latest addition of biotechnology literature analysis, we aimed to unveil the latest trends (since 2017) in biotechnology research. By analyzing the research literature, we identified the latest popular research themes, major contributors in terms of institutions, countries/regions, and journals.
E
1. Introduction
T
94
P
91 93 92
68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 81 79 80
136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158
162 163 164 165 166 167 168
The bibliographic data of the included biotechnology publications were 170 extracted, which included publication year, authorship, institutions, 171 2
A.W.K. Yeung et al.
205
The annual numbers of biotechnology publications indexed in WoS for years 2017–2019 (until May) were 5294, 5345, and 1712 respectively, summing up to a total of 12,351. These articles were predominantly published in English (n = 12,045; 97.5%). Original articles (n = 9043; 73.2%) were more prevalent than review papers (n = 2308; 18.7%), proceedings papers (n = 569; 4.6%), editorial materials (327; 2.6%), or meeting abstracts (n = 126; 1.0%) (Fig. 1). Among the top 25 most productive authors, 18 had a Chinese name, with the top 2 being “Wang Y” and “Zhang Y”. It is a known issue of WoS that some publications are recorded with initialized author names, which may confound the authors' publication counts by merging multiple authors into one, especially for initialized Chinese names (Yeung et al., 2019b). Therefore, no further analysis of authorship was performed.
206
3.2. Institutions and countries/regions
207 208
Over 8500 institutions contributed to these biotechnology publications. The top 5 most productive institutions were scattered over France, China, the United States of America, Spain, and Brazil (Table 1). These were
202 203 204
209
C
200 201
E
198 199
R
196 197
O R
194 195
10000 9000 8000 7000 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0
ARTICLE
REVIEW
PROCEEDINGS EDITORIAL PAPER MATERIAL
Fig. 1. Publication count of different document types. 3
Publication count (% of total)
Citation per publication
236 (1.9%) 216 (1.7%) 214 (1.7%) 204 (1.7%) 177 (1.4%)
3.6 3.6 4.6 4.4 2.6
2208 (17.9%) 1559 (12.6%) 1056 (8.6%) 862 (7.0%) 756 (6.1%)
3.9 3.3 3.6 2.0 2.8
500 (4.0%) 224 (1.8%) 208 (1.7%) 181 (1.5%) 166 (1.3%)
1.8 6.5 2.9 2.3 3.1
followed by the Russian Academy of Sciences, Helmholtz Association of German Research Centres, French National Institute for Agricultural Research (INRA), the United States of America Department of Energy, and the Technical University of Denmark. Over 140 countries/regions contributed to biotechnology research, with the top 5 most productive ones being the United States of America, China, Germany, Brazil, and India. Together, these distributions highlight the latest (since 2017) worldwide research interest in biotechnology. These findings are also consistent with the report that countries like China, India, and Brazil are among the emerging science influencers that are currently publishing nearly 20 times more papers than they were in the early-1980s (Adams, 2013). A closer look into the most cited Brazilian publications revealed bioremediation as a common theme. Notable examples included an investigation of the gut microbiota as a potential tool to degrade insecticides (de Almeida et al., 2017), utilization of microorganisms for biosorption of the environmental contaminant chromium (Vendruscolo et al., 2017), and the use of microalgae and cyanobacteria to biofix carbon dioxide emitted from coal power plants (Duarte et al., 2017). Among the most cited Indian publications, the oxidase laccase was one of the common themes. Notable examples included a study that optimized the production of laccase from a
N C
188 189
Number of publications
186 187
U
184 185
F
193
182 183
O
3.1. General landscape
180 181
Institution French National Center for Scientific Research (CNRS) Chinese Academy of Sciences University of California system Spanish National Research Council (CSIC) University of São Paulo Country/region The United States of America China Germany Brazil India Journal Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering Biotechnology and Bioengineering Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology Biotechnology Progress Scientific Reports
R O
192
178 179
P
3. Results and discussion
176 177
Contributor
D
191
174 175
Table 1 The top 5 most productive institutions, countries/regions, and journals.
T
190
countries/regions of the institutions, journal title, WoS journal category, publication type, language, publication count, and citation count. The “Analyze” and “Create Citation Report” functions of the WoS platform were used for the initial analyses. The “full records and cited references” were exported and loaded into VOSviewer software (version 1.6.11, www. vosviewer.com) for further bibliometric analyses. The VOSviewer software analyzes the terms used in titles and abstracts of the included publications, relates them to publication and citation data, and illustrates the results by a term map (van Eck and Waltman, 2009; Yeung et al., 2017; Yeung et al., 2019a). In a term map, the bubble size reflects how frequently a term is mentioned in the included publications (multiple mentioning in one publication counts as one only). The bubble color, on the other hand, reflects how frequently a publication mentioning the term is cited on average (citations per publication, CPP). Lastly, the distance between two bubbles reflects how frequently two terms are mentioned in the same publications. Only words that appear in at least 1% (n = 124) of the manuscripts are analyzed and visualized. The frequencies of author keywords and keywords added by WoS are also analyzed by VOSviewer.
E
172 173
Current Research in Biotechnology xxx (xxxx) xxx
MEETING ABSTRACT
t1:1 t1:2 t1:3
t1:4 t1:5 t1:6 t1:7 t1:8 t1:9 t1:10 t1:11 t1:12 t1:13 t1:14 t1:15 t1:16 t1:17 t1:18 t1:19 t1:20 t1:21
210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229
A.W.K. Yeung et al.
Journal category
Publication count
Citation per publication
t2:5 t2:6 t2:7 t2:8 t2:9 t2:10 t2:11 t2:12 t2:13 t2:14 t2:15 t2:16 t2:17 t2:18 t2:19 t2:20 t2:21 t2:22 t2:23 t2:24
Biotechnology applied microbiology Biochemistry molecular biology Food science technology Microbiology Chemistry multidisciplinary Multidisciplinary sciences Plant sciences Biochemical research methods Engineering chemical Environmental sciences Pharmacology pharmacy Materials science multidisciplinary Chemistry physical Chemistry applied Genetics heredity Nanoscience nanotechnology Energy fuels Polymer science Engineering environmental Management
3599 1297 1077 924 817 665 645 551 470 452 391 326 293 274 272 267 262 258 237 223
3.1 3.4 2.1 3.2 4.2 3.2 2.7 2.8 2.0 3.3 2.3 3.3 3.6 3.1 3.1 4.5 5.0 4.4 3.0 1.5
O
233
3.3. Journals and journal categories
234
Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering stood out as the most productive journal, having contributed to 4.0% of all publications, more than double of
C E R R O C N U
235
T
232
fungus under solid state fermentation (Chenthamarakshan et al., 2017), and a demonstration of biodegradation of toxic textile dyes mediated by laccase produced by bacteria (Kuppusamy et al., 2017).
R O
230 231
F
t2:4
P
t2:3
the contribution by the 2nd journal (Biotechnology and Bioengineering; contributing 1.8%). This is different from other recently analyzed sets of literature in which no single journal clearly outperformed the others, e.g., in the research fields of dietary natural products (Yeung et al., 2018a), curcumin (Yeung et al., 2019b), resveratrol (Yeung et al., 2019c), and neuropharmacology (Yeung et al., 2018b). While the reasons for this observation are not entirely clear, it is apparent that Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering (2018 journal impact factor of 2.03; publishing original full-length research papers, reviews, and Letters to the Editor) might currently represent a platform preferred by authors for publishing biotech-related articles (factors such as broadness of scope, diversity of article types, and acceptance rate can certainly be of importance in the context of this observation). In terms of journal category, we could also show that the dominating category was Biotechnology applied microbiology, having three-fold more contributions compared to the 2nd category. On the other hand, by examining the top 20 categories, one could appreciate the diversity of biotechnology research, which overlapped with the areas of biology, chemistry, engineering, plant sciences, microbiology, pharmacology, genetics, nanoscience, and management (Table 2). This wide spectrum is illustrative for the highly interdisciplinary nature of biotechnology-linked research that expands beyond the life sciences to cover scientific works from fields such as engineering or management. In management journals, for example, relevant publications often analyzed biotechnology cases to investigate how knowledge advancements and maturation could be adopted as product innovations (Capaldo et al., 2017; Moeen and Agarwal, 2017). Along the same lines, biotech startup companies have become popular in recent years, propelled by collaborations between the industry and academia via various models of consultancy, contract research, and public-private partnerships (Pronk et al., 2015). Hence, we expect an increasing contribution of biotechnology-linked research to be published by management journals in the near future. Along the same line, the highly interdisciplinary nature
Table 2 The publication count and citation per publication of the top 20 most productive journal categories.
D
t2:2
E
t2:1
Current Research in Biotechnology xxx (xxxx) xxx
Fig. 2. Term map of biotechnology publications. There were 411 terms that appeared in >1% (n = 124) of the 12,351 publications published in 2017–2019 (until May) and extracted from Web of Science. The bubble size reflects how frequently a term was mentioned in the included publications (multiple mentioning in one publication counted as one only). The bubble color reflects how frequently a publication mentioning the term was cited on average. The distance between two bubbles reflects how frequently two terms were mentioned in the same publications. 4
236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266
A.W.K. Yeung et al.
Current Research in Biotechnology xxx (xxxx) xxx
290
Metabolic engineering was the second most prevalent author keyword, ranking in second place immediately after biotechnology, and the related term synthetic biology came in third place. Both author keywords and keywords added by WoS indicated that Escherichia coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae were the most frequently used organisms in biotechnology investigations, including biosynthesis of valuable biomolecules (Tables 4 and 5). E. coli is a highly popular model organism used in a range of biotechnology applications, such as in metabolic engineering, where it can be modified to produce valuable compounds via synthetic metabolic networks (Erb et al., 2017), such as myo-inositol (inositol) (You et al., 2017) and monoterpenes (Korman et al., 2017); and in genetic engineering, where the recently developed CRISPR and its associated genome-editing techniques yielded many follow-up studies that apply to diverse species (Burstein et al., 2017;
295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302
t3:1 t3:2
C
293 294
E
291 292
R
286 287
O R
284 285
810 (6.6%) 184 (1.5%) 171 (1.4%) 131 (1.1%) 112 (0.9%) 98 (0.8%) 93 (0.8%) 91 (0.7%) 91 (0.7%) 90 (0.7%) 81 (0.7%) 80 (0.6%) 80 (0.6%) 76 (0.6%) 76 (0.6%) 75 (0.6%) 72 (0.6%) 71 (0.6%) 70 (0.6%) 70 (0.6%) 65 (0.5%) 60 (0.5%) 59 (0.5%) 59 (0.5%) 56 (0.5%)
2.3 5.2 3.9 2.6 2.9 2.8 3.1 3.8 3.0 4.8 3.6 4.8 1.5 2.4 2.7 3.1 2.7 2.5 2.9 3.1 2.0 3.8 2.5 2.4 2.6
t4:4 t4:5 t4:6 t4:7 t4:8 t4:9 t4:10 t4:11 t4:12 t4:13 t4:14 t4:15 t4:16 t4:17 t4:18 t4:19 t4:20 t4:21 t4:22 t4:23 t4:24 t4:25 t4:26 t4:27 t4:28
F
3.5. Keywords
282 283
Biotechnology Metabolic engineering Synthetic biology Fermentation Microalgae Escherichia coli Cyanobacteria Bioremediation Saccharomyces cerevisiae Biocatalysis Nanoparticles Immobilization Innovation Gene expression Yeast Genome editing Bacteria Biomass Enzymes Nanotechnology Genetic engineering Biodegradation Lipase Protein engineering Industrial biotechnology
O
289
280 281
t4:3
R O
288
The term map revealed that many of the publications investigated the production (n = 3345; CPP = 3.0) or synthesis (n = 917; CPP = 3.6) of valuable biomolecules, e.g., via bacteria (n = 1328; CPP = 3.0) (Fig. 2). Biotechnology was applied to study/modify genes (n = 1831; CPP = 2.6) and enzymes (n = 1875; CPP = 3.2), and to create optimized or synthetic metabolic networks and pathways for the production of biomolecules. Some of the more cited terms included biosensor (n = 170; CPP = 5.9), microbe (n = 252; CPP = 5.1); biofuel (n = 236; CPP = 4.8), polymer (n = 335; CPP = 4.8), metabolic engineering (n = 238; CPP = 4.8), and nanotechnology (n = 194; CPP = 4.4). The 25 most frequently mentioned terms are mostly words with more general meaning (e.g., production, application, analysis) and are listed in Table 3.
278 279
2017 2018 2019 Citation count count count per (until publication May)
P
277
273 274
Total publication count (% of total)
306 68 50 57 23 39 34 30 44 39 27 30 30 33 31 21 18 31 32 32 19 13 6 20 16
351 90 87 52 65 43 45 42 38 35 32 36 41 35 26 36 37 32 26 26 34 32 22 24 31
134 22 28 19 23 14 13 13 7 14 17 10 9 6 16 15 14 8 9 11 12 10 10 14 7
D
3.4. Term map
271 272
t4:2
Keyword
Pawluk et al., 2018; Komor et al., 2017). Similarly, engineered S. cerevisiae is, for example, deployed to produce adipic acid, a useful monomer in nylon synthesis (Kruyer and Peralta-Yahya, 2017); astaxanthin, a keto-carotenoid which is a food colorant and potent antioxidant (Zhou et al., 2019); and also biofuels, such as ethanol, converted from xylose in agricultural residues and energy crops (Kwak and Jin, 2017; Jansen et al., 2017). Similarly, biotechnology applications can also be used for scaledup production of natural products that become successful drugs (Atanasov et al., 2015) or have other biomedical applications (Brahmi et al., 2018; Cătană et al., 2018; Eid et al., 2017; Ververidis et al., 2007). Biocatalysis was another popular topic, which relates to optimization of existing
303 304
Table 5 The top 25 recurring keywords added by Web of Science (Keywords Plus).
t5:1
E
276
269 270
t4:1
Table 4 The top 25 recurring author keywords.
T
275
of biotechnology-linked research is also well reflected in the first four articles accepted for publication in Current Research in Biotechnology, which are coming from entirely different research spheres, in particular representing an expert opinion on safety of genome edited crops (Lassoued et al., 2019), research describing the development of whole-cell bacterial electrochemical urea sensor (Cabrera et al., 2019), study on the potential of dietary supplementation with black pepper to improve blood lipid levels, and the development of copper oxide-loaded polyacrylonitrile nanofiber membranes for antimicrobial breath mask applications (Kim et al., 2019).
267 268
Table 3 The top 25 recurring terms from titles and abstracts.
305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313
t5:2
Term
Publication count (% of total)
Citation per publication
Keyword
Publication count (% of total)
Citation per publication
t5:3
t3:4 t3:5 t3:6 t3:7 t3:8 t3:9 t3:10 t3:11 t3:12 t3:13 t3:14 t3:15 t3:16 t3:17 t3:18 t3:19 t3:20 t3:21 t3:22 t3:23 t3:24 t3:25 t3:26 t3:27 t3:28
Study Biotechnology Production Application Analysis Activity Process Development System Use Effect Approach Protein Cell Condition Enzyme Gene Research Review Product Property Strain Technology Strategy Concentration
4509 (36.5%) 3680 (29.8%) 3345 (27.1%) 2977 (24.1%) 2907 (23.5%) 2647 (21.4%) 2635 (21.3%) 2577 (20.9%) 2462 (19.9%) 2194 (17.8%) 2124 (17.2%) 2120 (17.2%) 2057 (16.7%) 2012 (16.3%) 2011 (16.3%) 1875 (15.2%) 1831 (14.8%) 1758 (14.2%) 1678 (13.6%) 1656 (13.4%) 1625 (13.2%) 1624 (13.1%) 1617 (13.1%) 1592 (12.9%) 1525 (12.3%)
2.5 3.2 3.0 3.8 2.3 2.8 2.8 3.3 3.5 3.0 2.5 3.4 3.0 3.1 2.6 3.2 2.6 3.1 5.4 3.1 3.5 2.6 3.4 3.5 2.4
Escherichia coli Expression Biotechnology Identification Growth Purification Protein Saccharomyces cerevisiae In vitro Biosynthesis Gene-expression Gene Bacteria Optimization Fermentation Diversity Proteins System Performance Cells Nanoparticles Enzymes Evolution Degradation Acid
735 (6.0%) 716 (5.8%) 597 (4.8%) 517 (4.2%) 497 (4.0%) 490 (4.0%) 360 (2.9%) 340 (2.8%) 326 (2.6%) 312 (2.5%) 312 (2.5%) 300 (2.4%) 267 (2.2%) 266 (2.2%) 265 (2.1%) 256 (2.1%) 255 (2.1%) 234 (1.9%) 225 (1.8%) 224 (1.8%) 224 (1.8%) 216 (1.7%) 214 (1.7%) 212 (1.7%) 202 (1.6%)
3.9 2.3 1.8 2.1 2.2 1.9 2.2 4.1 3.6 2.9 3.6 2.6 2.7 2.0 2.5 2.1 2.3 2.9 1.7 2.6 3.3 2.8 3.1 2.5 2.9
t5:4 t5:5 t5:6 t5:7 t5:8 t5:9 t5:10 t5:11 t5:12 t5:13 t5:14 t5:15 t5:16 t5:17 t5:18 t5:19 t5:20 t5:21 t5:22 t5:23 t5:24 t5:25 t5:26 t5:27 t5:28
U
N C
t3:3
5
Current Research in Biotechnology xxx (xxxx) xxx
R O
O
F
A.W.K. Yeung et al.
Fig. 3. Structures of selected natural products with biotechnological relevance, which are discussed in the text.
332
We conducted a bibliometric analysis of the biotechnology research literature since 2017. Over 12,000 publications were identified and analyzed. Over 8500 institutions contributed to biotechnology publications during this period. The top 5 most productive institutions were scattered over France, China, the United States of America, Spain, and Brazil. Over 140 countries/regions contributed to biotechnology research, with the top 5 most productive ones being the United States of America, China, Germany, Brazil, and India. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering was the most productive journal in terms of numbers of publications, and E. coli and S. cerevisiae were frequently involved in the biotechnology investigations. The traditionally important theme of metabolic engineering was also among the most important biotechnology research topics of the analyzed time period (2017–2019), and nanoparticles/nanotechnology are contemporary trending biotechnology research themes. It is expected that genetic and metabolic engineering will continue to thrive to further improve the efficacy of biosynthesis of useful chemicals and bioremediation of environmental pollutants. When the 25 most frequent keywords for 2017, 2018, and 2019 were examined separately, we found that purification, genomics, fungi, laccase, and biofilm were on the list in 2017, but were replaced by protein engineering, thermostability, biofuels, innovative biotechnologies, and drug delivery in 2019. Biotechnology research as a whole will continue to make strong impact on the environment, medicine, agriculture, food, and other diverse industrial areas. With more advanced
333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354
C
E
R R
328 329
O
326 327
C
324 325
N
322 323
Funding
358
Atanas G. Atanasov acknowledges the support by the Polish KNOW (Leading National Research Centre) Scientific Consortium “Healthy Animal—Safe Food,” decision of Ministry of Science and Higher Education No. 05-1/KNOW2/2015. Atanas G. Atanasov and Nikolay T. Tzvetkov acknowledge the support by the Bulgarian National Science Fund (BNSF) under Grant No. KP-06-OPR 03/8. Marc Diederich's research at SNU is supported by National Research Foundation (NRF) [Grant Number 019R1A2C1009231] and by a grant from the MEST of Korea for Tumor Microenvironment Global Core Research Center (GCRC) [Grant Number 2011-0030001]. Support from Brain Korea (BK21) PLUS program and Creative-Pioneering Researchers Program at Seoul National University [Funding number: 370C-20160062] are acknowledged. Marc Diederich also thanks the “Recherche Cancer et Sang” foundation, “Recherches Scientifiques Luxembourg” association, “Een Häerz fir kriibskrank Kanner” association, Action LIONS “Vaincre le Cancer” association and Te ĺ e v ́ ie Luxembourg.
359
Declaration of competing interest
375
360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 Q6
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of 376 any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a po- 377 tential conflict of interest. 378
U
320 321
P
4. Conclusion
318 319
D
331
316 317
technology on protein engineering, biofuels, and drug delivery, it is ex- 355 pected that biotechnology will particularly create a greener environment, 356 and benefit human health. 357
T
330
enzymes, including their immobilization for improving their stability and multiple usages, to fit into predefined parameters for producing pharmaceuticals and commodity chemicals (Sheldon and Woodley, 2017). Biocatalysis is also a central theme in environmental and medical bioremediation research (Karigar and Rao, 2011; Mathieu et al., 2009). The chemical structures of some chemicals mentioned above are listed in Fig. 3. Both author keywords and keywords added by WoS indicated nanoparticles and nanotechnology to be trending research themes in the recent (since 2017) biotechnology literature. For instance, some relevant recent works from this area focused on the synthesis of nanofibers that could be applied in tissue engineering, drug delivery systems, and wound dressings (Haider et al., 2018). Important application-area of nanotechnology is also the use of engineered nanoparticle-mediated delivery of genes and biotherapeutic agents (Singh et al., 2017). Metal nanoparticles were also studied as additives to improve the combustion performance and stability of diesel engines (Saxena et al., 2017).
E
314 315
6
References
379
Adams, J., 2013. Collaborations: the fourth age of research. Nature 497, 557–560. Amarakoon, I., Hamilton, C., Mitchell, S., Tennant, P., Roye, M., 2017. Chapter 28 - biotechnology. Pharmacognosy: Fundamentals, Applications and Strategies. Academic Press, pp. 549–563. Atanasov, A.G., Waltenberger, B., Pferschy-Wenzig, E.-M., Linder, T., Wawrosch, C., Uhrin, P., Temml, V., Wang, L., Schwaiger, S., Heiss, E.H., 2015. Discovery and resupply of pharmacologically active plant-derived natural products: a review. Biotechnol. Adv. 33, 1582–1614. Barcelos, M.C., Lupki, F.B., Campolina, G.A., Nelson, D.L., Molina, G., 2018. The colors of biotechnology: general overview and developments of white, green and blue areas. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 365, fny239. Beopoulos, A., Cescut, J., Haddouche, R., Uribelarrea, J.-L., Molina-Jouve, C., Nicaud, J.-M., 2009. Yarrowia lipolytica as a model for bio-oil production. Prog. Lipid Res. 48, 375–387.
380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392
A.W.K. Yeung et al.
D
P
R O
O
F
Kwak, S., Jin, Y.-S., 2017. Production of fuels and chemicals from xylose by engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a review and perspective. Microb. Cell Factories 16, 82. Lassoued, R., et al., 2019. Risk and safety considerations of genome edited crops: expert opinion. Current Research in Biotechnology https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crbiot.2019.1008.1001 (Accepted). Magnusson, M.K., Hursti, U.-K.K., 2002. Consumer attitudes towards genetically modified foods. Appetite 39, 9–24. Mathieu, J.M., Schloendorn, J., Rittmann, B.E., Alvarez, P.J., 2009. Medical bioremediation of age-related diseases. Microb. Cell Factories 8, 21. Moeen, M., Agarwal, R., 2017. Incubation of an industry: heterogeneous knowledge bases and modes of value capture. Strateg. Manag. J. 38, 566–587. Pawar, R.S., Krynitsky, A.J., Rader, J.I., 2013. Sweeteners from plants—with emphasis on Stevia rebaudiana (Bertoni) and Siraitia grosvenorii (Swingle). Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 405, 4397–4407. Pawluk, A., Davidson, A.R., Maxwell, K.L., 2018. Anti-CRISPR: discovery, mechanism and function. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 16, 12–17. Pronk, J.T., Lee, S.Y., Lievense, J., Pierce, J., Palsson, B., Uhlen, M., Nielsen, J., 2015. How to set up collaborations between academia and industrial biotech companies. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 237–240. Saxena, V., Kumar, N., Saxena, V.K., 2017. A comprehensive review on combustion and stability aspects of metal nanoparticles and its additive effect on diesel and biodiesel fuelled CI engine. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 70, 563–588. Sheldon, R.A., Woodley, J.M., 2017. Role of biocatalysis in sustainable chemistry. Chem. Rev. 118, 801–838. Singh, B.N., Gupta, V.K., Chen, J., Atanasov, A.G., 2017. Organic nanoparticle-based combinatory approaches for gene therapy. Trends Biotechnol. 35, 1121–1124. Taheri, F., Azadi, H., D'Haese, M., 2017. A world without hunger: organic or GM crops? Sustainability 9, 580. van Eck, N.J., Waltman, L., 2009. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics 84, 523–538. Vendruscolo, F., da Rocha Ferreira, G.L., Antoniosi Filho, N.R., 2017. Biosorption of hexavalent chromium by microorganisms. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegradation 119, 87–95. Ververidis, F., Trantas, E., Douglas, C., Vollmer, G., Kretzschmar, G., Panopoulos, N., 2007. Biotechnology of flavonoids and other phenylpropanoid-derived natural products. Part II: reconstruction of multienzyme pathways in plants and microbes. Biotechnology Journal: Healthcare Nutrition Technology 2, 1235–1249. Yeung, A.W.K., Goto, T.K., Leung, W.K., 2017. The changing landscape of neuroscience research, 2006–2015: a bibliometric study. Front. Neurosci. 11, 120. Yeung, A.W.K., Aggarwal, B., Barreca, D., Battino, M., Belwal, T., Horbańczuk, O., BerindanNeagoe, I., Bishayee, A., Daglia, M., Devkota, H., et al., 2018a. Dietary natural products and their potential to influence health and disease including animal model studies. Anim. Sci. Paper Rep. 36, 345–358. Yeung, A.W.K., Tzvetkov, N.T., Atanasov, A.G., 2018b. When neuroscience meets pharmacology: a neuropharmacology literature analysis. Front. Neurosci. 12, 852. Yeung, A.W.K., Tzvetkov, N.T., Zengin, G., Wang, D., Xu, S., Mitrović, G., Brnčić, M., Dall'Acqua, S., Pirgozliev, V., Kijjoa, A., et al., 2019a. The berries on the top. Journal of Berry Research 9, 125–139. Yeung, A.W.K., Horbańczuk, M., Tzvetkov, N.T., Mocan, A., Carradori, S., Maggi, F., Marchewka, J., Sut, S., Dall'Acqua, S., Gan, R.-Y., et al., 2019b. Curcumin: total-scale analysis of the scientific literature. Molecules 24, 1393. Yeung, A.W.K., Aggarwal, B.B., Orhan, I.E., Horbańczuk, O.K., Barreca, D., Battino, M., Belwal, T., Bishayee, A., Daglia, M., Devkota, H.P., et al., 2019c. Resveratrol, a popular dietary supplement for human and animal health: quantitative research literature analysis - a review. Anim. Sci. Paper Rep. 37, 103–118. You, C., Shi, T., Li, Y., Han, P., Zhou, X., Zhang, Y.H.P., 2017. An in vitro synthetic biology platform for the industrial biomanufacturing of myo-inositol from starch. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 114, 1855–1864. Zhou, P., Li, M., Shen, B., Yao, Z., Bian, Q., Ye, L., Yu, H., 2019. Directed coevolution of βcarotene ketolase and hydroxylase and its application in temperature-regulated biosynthesis of astaxanthin. J. Agric. Food Chem. 67, 1072–1080.
E
T
C
E
R
O R
N C
514
Brahmi, F., Vejux, A., Sghaier, R., Zarrouk, A., Nury, T., Meddeb, W., Rezig, L., Namsi, A., Sassi, K., Yammine, A., 2018. Prevention of 7-ketocholesterol-induced side effects by natural compounds. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 1–20. Bud, R., 1994. History of ‘biotechnology’. Nature 337, 10. Burstein, D., Harrington, L.B., Strutt, S.C., Probst, A.J., Anantharaman, K., Thomas, B.C., Doudna, J.A., Banfield, J.F., 2017. New CRISPR–Cas systems from uncultivated microbes. Nature 542, 237–241. Cabrera, C., et al., 2019. Electrochemical Proteus vulgaris whole cell urea sensor in synthetic urine. Current Research in Biotechnology https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crbiot.2019.1007.1002 (Accepted). Capaldo, A., Lavie, D., Messeni Petruzzelli, A., 2017. Knowledge maturity and the scientific value of innovations: the roles of knowledge distance and adoption. J. Manag. 43, 503–533. Cătană, C.-S., Atanasov, A.G., Berindan-Neagoe, I., 2018. Natural products with anti-aging potential: affected targets and molecular mechanisms. Biotechnol. Adv. 36, 1649–1656. Chenthamarakshan, A., Parambayil, N., Miziriya, N., Soumya, P., Lakshmi, M.K., Ramgopal, A., Dileep, A., Nambisan, P., 2017. Optimization of laccase production from Marasmiellus palmivorus LA1 by Taguchi method of design of experiments. BMC Biotechnol. 17, 12. Colson, G., Rousu, M.C., 2013. What do consumer surveys and experiments reveal and conceal about consumer preferences for genetically modified foods? GM Crops & Food 4, 158–165. Dalpé, R., 2002. Bibliometric analysis of biotechnology. Scientometrics 55, 189–213. de Almeida, L.G., de Moraes, L.A.B., Trigo, J.R., Omoto, C., Cônsoli, F.L., 2017. The gut microbiota of insecticide-resistant insects houses insecticide-degrading bacteria: a potential source for biotechnological exploitation. PLoS One 12, e0174754. Duarte, J.H., de Morais, E.G., Radmann, E.M., Costa, J.A.V., 2017. Biological CO2 mitigation from coal power plant by Chlorella fusca and Spirulina sp. Bioresour. Technol. 234, 472–475. Eid, H.M., Wright, M.L., Anil Kumar, N., Qawasmeh, A., Hassan, S.T., Mocan, A., Nabavi, S.M., Rastrelli, L., Atanasov, A.G., Haddad, P.S., 2017. Significance of microbiota in obesity and metabolic diseases and the modulatory potential by medicinal plant and food ingredients. Front. Pharmacol. 8, 387. Erb, T.J., Jones, P.R., Bar-Even, A., 2017. Synthetic metabolism: metabolic engineering meets enzyme design. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 37, 56–62. Gartland, K., Bruschi, F., Dundar, M., Gahan, P., Magni, M.V., Akbarova, Y., 2013. Progress towards the ‘golden age’ of biotechnology. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 24, S6–S13. Haider, A., Haider, S., Kang, I.-K., 2018. A comprehensive review summarizing the effect of electrospinning parameters and potential applications of nanofibers in biomedical and biotechnology. Arab. J. Chem. 11, 1165–1188. Jansen, M.L., Bracher, J.M., Papapetridis, I., Verhoeven, M.D., de Bruijn, H., de Waal, P.P., van Maris, A.J., Klaassen, P., Pronk, J.T., 2017. Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains for secondgeneration ethanol production: from academic exploration to industrial implementation. FEMS Yeast Res. 17, fox044. Karaffa, L., Kubicek, C.P., 2003. Aspergillus niger citric acid accumulation: do we understand this well working black box? Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 61, 189–196. Karigar, C.S., Rao, S.S., 2011. Role of microbial enzymes in the bioremediation of pollutants: a review. Enzyme Research 2011, 805187. Kennedy, M.J., 1991. The evolution of the word ‘biotechnology’. Trends Biotechnol. 9, 218–220. Kim, I., et al., 2019. Copper oxide (CuO) loaded polyacrylonitrile (PAN) nanofiber membranes for antimicrobial breath mask applications. Current Research in Biotechnology https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.crbiot.2019.1007.1001 (Accepted). Komor, A.C., Badran, A.H., Liu, D.R., 2017. CRISPR-based technologies for the manipulation of eukaryotic genomes. Cell 168, 20–36. Korman, T.P., Opgenorth, P.H., Bowie, J.U., 2017. A synthetic biochemistry platform for cell free production of monoterpenes from glucose. Nat. Commun. 8, 15526. Kruyer, N.S., Peralta-Yahya, P., 2017. Metabolic engineering strategies to bio-adipic acid production. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 45, 136–143. Kuppusamy, S., Sethurajan, M., Kadarkarai, M., Aruliah, R., 2017. Biodecolourization of textile dyes by novel, indigenous Pseudomonas stutzeri MN1 and Acinetobacter baumannii MN3. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 5, 716–724.
U
393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453
Current Research in Biotechnology xxx (xxxx) xxx
7
454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Current Research in Biotechnology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/crbiot
Q4 Q3
F
O
R O
a
Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Applied Oral Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China Institute of Molecular Biology “Roumen Tsanev”, Department of Biochemical Pharmacology and Drug Design, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Acad. G. Bonchev Str., Bl. 21, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria c Pharmaceutical Institute, University of Bonn, An der Immenburg 4, 53121 Bonn, Germany d Department of Chemistry and Biotechnology, ERA Chair of Green Chemistry, Tallinn University of Technology, 12618 Tallinn, Estonia e Department of Biochemistry, Institute of Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221 005, India f NanoBioCel Group, Laboratory of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, Paseo de la Universidad 7, 01006 Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain g Biomedical Research Networking Centre in Bioengineering, Biomaterials and Nanomedicine (CIBER-BBN), Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain h University Institute for Regenerative Medicine and Oral Implantology - UIRMI (UPV/EHU-Fundación Eduardo Anitua), Vitoria, Spain i Institute of Analytical Chemistry and Radiochemistry, Leopold-Franzens University of Innsbruck, Austria j Austrian Drug Screening Institute - ADSI, CCB—Center of Chemistry and Biomedicine, Innsbruck, Austria k Neuroimmunology and Neurochemistry Research Group, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany l Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine, Bradenton, FL, USA m Department of Pharmaceutical Biology, Institute of Pharmacy and Biochemistry, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany n Institute of Chinese Medical Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Quality Research in Chinese Medicine, University of Macau, Macau, China o National Institute for Agricultural and Veterinary Research (INIAV), Vila do Conde, Portugal p Center for Study in Animal Science (CECA), ICETA, University of Porto, Oporto, Portugal q Institute of Food Sciences, National Research Council, Avellino, Italy r Department of Pharmacy, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy s Nutrition and Food Science Group, Dept. of Analytical and Food Chemistry, CITACA, CACTI, University of Vigo, Vigo Campus, Vigo, Spain t Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy u Department of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey v Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Catania, Catania, Italy w Research Group ‘Pharmacognosy and Phytotherapy’, UCL School of Pharmacy, London, UK x Inflammation Research Center, San Diego, CA, USA y Department of Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea z Department of Hypertension, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland aa Department of Ecogenomics and Systems Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria ab Vienna Metabolomics Center, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria ac Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Department of Pharmacognosy, University of Graz, Graz, Austria ad Department of Biology, The University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA ae Department of Biomolecular Sciences, The Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel af Cell Biology, Biocenter, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria ag Austrian Drug Screening Institute-ADSI, Innsbruck, Austria ah School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Geneva, University of Lausanne, Geneva, Switzerland ai Natural Products Laboratory, Institute of Biology, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands aj Allelopathy Group, Department of Organic Chemistry, Institute of Biomolecules (INBIO), Campus de Excelencia Internacional (ceiA3), School of Science, University of Cadiz, Cadiz, Spain ak Institute of Pharmacy and Molecular Biotechnology, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany al Helmholtz-Center for Infection Research, Department of Microbial Drugs, Braunschweig, Germany am Research Department of Pharmaceutical and Biological Chemistry, UCL School of Pharmacy, London, UK an Laboratory of Foodomics, Bioactivity and Food Analysis Department, Institute of Food Science Research CIAL (UAM-CSIC), Madrid, Spain ao Team Bio-PeroxIL, ‘Biochemistry of the Peroxisome, Inflammation and Lipid Metabolism’ (EA7270)/University Bourgogne Franche-Comté/Inserm, Dijon, France
P
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Q5 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50
b
D
9
E
8
T
7
C
6
E
5
R
4
O R
3
⁎
Andy Wai Kan Yeung a, , Nikolay T. Tzvetkov b,c, Vijai K. Gupta d, Subash C. Gupta e, Gorka Orive f,g,h, Günther K. Bonn i,j, Bernd Fiebich k, Anupam Bishayee l, Thomas Efferth m, Jianbo Xiao n, Ana Sanches Silva o,p, Gian Luigi Russo q, Maria Daglia r, Maurizio Battino s,t, Ilkay Erdogan Orhan u, Ferdinando Nicoletti v, Michael Heinrich w, Bharat Bhushan Aggarwal x, Marc Diederich y, Maciej Banach z, Wolfram Weckwerth aa,ab, Rudolf Bauer ac, George Perry ad, Edward A. Bayer ae, Lukas A. Huber af,ag, Jean-Luc Wolfender ah, Robert Verpoorte ai, Francisco A. Macias aj, Michael Wink ak, Marc Stadler al, Simon Gibbons am, Alejandro Cifuentes an, Elena Ibanez an, Gérard Lizard ao, Rolf Müller ap, ⁎⁎ Michael Ristow ar, Atanas G. Atanasov aq,as,at,
N C
Q22Q1
Current research in biotechnology: Exploring the biotech forefront
U
1
⁎ Corresponding author. ⁎⁎ Correspondence to: A.G. Atanasov, The Institute of Genetics and Animal Breeding, Polish Academy of Sciences, Jastrzębiec, 05-552 Magdalenka, Poland. E-mail addresses: [email protected], (A.W.K. Yeung), [email protected]. (A.G. Atanasov).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.crbiot.2019.08.003 2590-2628/© 2019 Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
A.W.K. Yeung et al.
51 52 53 54 55
ap aq ar as at
Current Research in Biotechnology xxx (xxxx) xxx
ThematicTranslational Unit Novel Antibiotics, German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), Braunschweig, Germany The Institute of Genetics and Animal Breeding, Polish Academy of Sciences, Jastrzębiec, 05-552 Magdalenka, Poland Institute of Translational Medicine, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Swiss Federal Institute for Technology (ETH) Zürich, Switzerland Department of Pharmacognosy, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria Institute of Neurobiology, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria
56 5 7
A R T I C L E
58 59 60 61 62 67 66 65 64 63 82 83 84 85 86 87 88
Article history: Received 28 June 2019 Received in revised form 28 August 2019 Accepted 28 August 2019 Available online xxxx
I N F O
A B S T R A C T
Biotechnology is an evolving research field that covers a broad range of topics. Here we aimed to evaluate the latest research literature, to identify prominent research themes, major contributors in terms of institutions, countries/regions, and journals. The Web of Science Core Collection online database was searched to retrieve biotechnology articles published since 2017. In total, 12,351 publications were identified and analyzed. Over 8500 institutions contributed to these biotechnology publications, with the top 5 most productive ones scattered over France, China, the United States of America, Spain, and Brazil. Over 140 countries/regions contributed to the biotechnology research literature, led by the United States of America, China, Germany, Brazil, and India. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering was the most productive journal in terms of number of publications. Metabolic engineering was among the most prevalent biotechnology study themes, and Escherichia coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae were frequently used in biotechnology investigations, including the biosynthesis of useful biomolecules, such as myo-inositol (vitamin B8), monoterpenes, adipic acid, astaxanthin, and ethanol. Nanoparticles and nanotechnology were identified too as emerging biotechnology research themes of great significance. Biotechnology continues to evolve and will remain a major driver of societal innovation and development.
R O
O
F
Keywords: Metabolic engineering Escherichia coli Saccharomyces cerevisiae Nanoparticles Nanotechnology Bioremediation
90 89
Biotechnology research covers a broad range of topics. As defined in the scopes of the journals Current Research in Biotechnology and Current Opinion in Biotechnology, major themes of biotechnology research include genetic and molecular engineering; tissue, cell, and pathway engineering; plant and animal biotechnology; food biotechnology; energy biotechnology; environmental biotechnology; analytical biotechnology; systems biology; nanobiotechnology; chemical biotechnology; medicinal and pharmaceutical biotechnology. The term biotechnology is attributed to be coined by the agricultural economist-cum-engineer Karl Erkey from Hungary, exactly 100 years ago. Karl Erkey defined biotechnology as, translated into English, “all the lines of work by which products are produced from raw materials with the aid of living organisms” (Amarakoon et al., 2017; Bud, 1994). The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), an intergovernmental economic organization with 36 member countries, refined the definition of biotechnology as “application of scientific and engineering principles to the processing of materials by biological agents to provide goods and services; new biotechnology involves the use of cellular and molecular processes to solve problems or make products” (Amarakoon et al., 2017). Starting in the mid-1980s, biotechnology became a very popular word in the title of research publications, appearing in papers concerning business, industry, biomedicine, chemical engineering, agricultural sciences, and even social sciences (Kennedy, 1991). In short, biotechnology signifies a new biological approach to a wide range of industries. Biotechnology was suggested to have mainly 4 sectors, white, red, green, and blue, which represent industrial, pharmaceutical/medical, food and agriculture, and environment/marine, respectively (Barcelos et al., 2018). Two well-known examples of daily applications of biotechnology are the production of the multifunctional citric acid by fermentation with the aid of Aspergillus niger, and, to a lesser extent, Yarrowia lipolytica (Karaffa and Kubicek, 2003), as well as the use of Y. lipolytica as a model for bio-oil production (Beopoulos et al., 2009); and the production of non-nutritive sweeteners, steviol glucosides and mogrosides, from plants Stevia rebaudiana and Siraitia grosvenorii, respectively (Pawar et al., 2013). Meanwhile, genetically-modified (GM) foods represent another biotechnology-derived aspect that significantly affects our everyday life. A survey conducted in 2002 reported that the majority of consumers were negative about GM foods, as their moral and ethical concerns about GM food consumption outweighed the benefits of better taste and lower price (Magnusson and Hursti, 2002). In 2015, however, GM crops were already grown on 180 million hectares of land in 28 countries, equivalent to
108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134
C
E
106 107
R R
104 105
O
102 103
C
100 101
N
98 99
U
96 97
135
2. Materials and methods
159
2.1. Literature search
160
In May 2019, a search was conducted through the Web of Science (WoS) Core Collection electronic database (Clarivate Analytics, Philadelphia, USA) to identify the latest biotechnology publications. The following search string was used: TOPIC = (“biotech*”). This search strategy yielded publications that mentioned the words biotech, biotechnology or their derivatives in the title, abstract, or keywords. In order to focus on contemporary biotechnology research trends, only articles published between 2017 and 2019 were included.
161
2.2. Data extraction and analysis
169
D
95
10% of total arable land worldwide (Taheri et al., 2017). While GM crops and GM foods will likely continue to flourish with the advancements in biotechnology, consumer surveys repeatedly indicate inferior consumer acceptance reflected in the lower willingness of purchasers to pay for GM foods than for non-GM foods (Colson and Rousu, 2013). Red (medical and pharmaceutical) biotechnology has witnessed important recent developments and makes strong impact on human health and disease therapies. Biotechnology has been a frontline field driving both uncovering of molecular mechanisms of diseases and identification of new molecular biomarkers and drug targets (e.g., through the use of engineered biological models with knock-out, knock-down, or overexpression of relevant proteins), as well as the identification and subsequent pharmaceutical development of therapeutics (e.g., many antibiotics, other smallmolecule natural product-derived drugs, and recombinant proteins such as antibodies and hormones) (Gartland et al., 2013). Bibliometric analyses of biotechnology literature were so far occasionally published to reflect on the evolution of the field or evaluate the contributions and performances of specific countries. For a detailed list of such studies published until 2001, readers are referred to Table 1 of the work published in 2002 by Dalpé (Dalpé, 2002). In this latest addition of biotechnology literature analysis, we aimed to unveil the latest trends (since 2017) in biotechnology research. By analyzing the research literature, we identified the latest popular research themes, major contributors in terms of institutions, countries/regions, and journals.
E
1. Introduction
T
94
P
91 93 92
68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 81 79 80
136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158
162 163 164 165 166 167 168
The bibliographic data of the included biotechnology publications were 170 extracted, which included publication year, authorship, institutions, 171 2
A.W.K. Yeung et al.
205
The annual numbers of biotechnology publications indexed in WoS for years 2017–2019 (until May) were 5294, 5345, and 1712 respectively, summing up to a total of 12,351. These articles were predominantly published in English (n = 12,045; 97.5%). Original articles (n = 9043; 73.2%) were more prevalent than review papers (n = 2308; 18.7%), proceedings papers (n = 569; 4.6%), editorial materials (327; 2.6%), or meeting abstracts (n = 126; 1.0%) (Fig. 1). Among the top 25 most productive authors, 18 had a Chinese name, with the top 2 being “Wang Y” and “Zhang Y”. It is a known issue of WoS that some publications are recorded with initialized author names, which may confound the authors' publication counts by merging multiple authors into one, especially for initialized Chinese names (Yeung et al., 2019b). Therefore, no further analysis of authorship was performed.
206
3.2. Institutions and countries/regions
207 208
Over 8500 institutions contributed to these biotechnology publications. The top 5 most productive institutions were scattered over France, China, the United States of America, Spain, and Brazil (Table 1). These were
202 203 204
209
C
200 201
E
198 199
R
196 197
O R
194 195
10000 9000 8000 7000 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0
ARTICLE
REVIEW
PROCEEDINGS EDITORIAL PAPER MATERIAL
Fig. 1. Publication count of different document types. 3
Publication count (% of total)
Citation per publication
236 (1.9%) 216 (1.7%) 214 (1.7%) 204 (1.7%) 177 (1.4%)
3.6 3.6 4.6 4.4 2.6
2208 (17.9%) 1559 (12.6%) 1056 (8.6%) 862 (7.0%) 756 (6.1%)
3.9 3.3 3.6 2.0 2.8
500 (4.0%) 224 (1.8%) 208 (1.7%) 181 (1.5%) 166 (1.3%)
1.8 6.5 2.9 2.3 3.1
followed by the Russian Academy of Sciences, Helmholtz Association of German Research Centres, French National Institute for Agricultural Research (INRA), the United States of America Department of Energy, and the Technical University of Denmark. Over 140 countries/regions contributed to biotechnology research, with the top 5 most productive ones being the United States of America, China, Germany, Brazil, and India. Together, these distributions highlight the latest (since 2017) worldwide research interest in biotechnology. These findings are also consistent with the report that countries like China, India, and Brazil are among the emerging science influencers that are currently publishing nearly 20 times more papers than they were in the early-1980s (Adams, 2013). A closer look into the most cited Brazilian publications revealed bioremediation as a common theme. Notable examples included an investigation of the gut microbiota as a potential tool to degrade insecticides (de Almeida et al., 2017), utilization of microorganisms for biosorption of the environmental contaminant chromium (Vendruscolo et al., 2017), and the use of microalgae and cyanobacteria to biofix carbon dioxide emitted from coal power plants (Duarte et al., 2017). Among the most cited Indian publications, the oxidase laccase was one of the common themes. Notable examples included a study that optimized the production of laccase from a
N C
188 189
Number of publications
186 187
U
184 185
F
193
182 183
O
3.1. General landscape
180 181
Institution French National Center for Scientific Research (CNRS) Chinese Academy of Sciences University of California system Spanish National Research Council (CSIC) University of São Paulo Country/region The United States of America China Germany Brazil India Journal Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering Biotechnology and Bioengineering Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology Biotechnology Progress Scientific Reports
R O
192
178 179
P
3. Results and discussion
176 177
Contributor
D
191
174 175
Table 1 The top 5 most productive institutions, countries/regions, and journals.
T
190
countries/regions of the institutions, journal title, WoS journal category, publication type, language, publication count, and citation count. The “Analyze” and “Create Citation Report” functions of the WoS platform were used for the initial analyses. The “full records and cited references” were exported and loaded into VOSviewer software (version 1.6.11, www. vosviewer.com) for further bibliometric analyses. The VOSviewer software analyzes the terms used in titles and abstracts of the included publications, relates them to publication and citation data, and illustrates the results by a term map (van Eck and Waltman, 2009; Yeung et al., 2017; Yeung et al., 2019a). In a term map, the bubble size reflects how frequently a term is mentioned in the included publications (multiple mentioning in one publication counts as one only). The bubble color, on the other hand, reflects how frequently a publication mentioning the term is cited on average (citations per publication, CPP). Lastly, the distance between two bubbles reflects how frequently two terms are mentioned in the same publications. Only words that appear in at least 1% (n = 124) of the manuscripts are analyzed and visualized. The frequencies of author keywords and keywords added by WoS are also analyzed by VOSviewer.
E
172 173
Current Research in Biotechnology xxx (xxxx) xxx
MEETING ABSTRACT
t1:1 t1:2 t1:3
t1:4 t1:5 t1:6 t1:7 t1:8 t1:9 t1:10 t1:11 t1:12 t1:13 t1:14 t1:15 t1:16 t1:17 t1:18 t1:19 t1:20 t1:21
210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229
A.W.K. Yeung et al.
Journal category
Publication count
Citation per publication
t2:5 t2:6 t2:7 t2:8 t2:9 t2:10 t2:11 t2:12 t2:13 t2:14 t2:15 t2:16 t2:17 t2:18 t2:19 t2:20 t2:21 t2:22 t2:23 t2:24
Biotechnology applied microbiology Biochemistry molecular biology Food science technology Microbiology Chemistry multidisciplinary Multidisciplinary sciences Plant sciences Biochemical research methods Engineering chemical Environmental sciences Pharmacology pharmacy Materials science multidisciplinary Chemistry physical Chemistry applied Genetics heredity Nanoscience nanotechnology Energy fuels Polymer science Engineering environmental Management
3599 1297 1077 924 817 665 645 551 470 452 391 326 293 274 272 267 262 258 237 223
3.1 3.4 2.1 3.2 4.2 3.2 2.7 2.8 2.0 3.3 2.3 3.3 3.6 3.1 3.1 4.5 5.0 4.4 3.0 1.5
O
233
3.3. Journals and journal categories
234
Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering stood out as the most productive journal, having contributed to 4.0% of all publications, more than double of
C E R R O C N U
235
T
232
fungus under solid state fermentation (Chenthamarakshan et al., 2017), and a demonstration of biodegradation of toxic textile dyes mediated by laccase produced by bacteria (Kuppusamy et al., 2017).
R O
230 231
F
t2:4
P
t2:3
the contribution by the 2nd journal (Biotechnology and Bioengineering; contributing 1.8%). This is different from other recently analyzed sets of literature in which no single journal clearly outperformed the others, e.g., in the research fields of dietary natural products (Yeung et al., 2018a), curcumin (Yeung et al., 2019b), resveratrol (Yeung et al., 2019c), and neuropharmacology (Yeung et al., 2018b). While the reasons for this observation are not entirely clear, it is apparent that Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering (2018 journal impact factor of 2.03; publishing original full-length research papers, reviews, and Letters to the Editor) might currently represent a platform preferred by authors for publishing biotech-related articles (factors such as broadness of scope, diversity of article types, and acceptance rate can certainly be of importance in the context of this observation). In terms of journal category, we could also show that the dominating category was Biotechnology applied microbiology, having three-fold more contributions compared to the 2nd category. On the other hand, by examining the top 20 categories, one could appreciate the diversity of biotechnology research, which overlapped with the areas of biology, chemistry, engineering, plant sciences, microbiology, pharmacology, genetics, nanoscience, and management (Table 2). This wide spectrum is illustrative for the highly interdisciplinary nature of biotechnology-linked research that expands beyond the life sciences to cover scientific works from fields such as engineering or management. In management journals, for example, relevant publications often analyzed biotechnology cases to investigate how knowledge advancements and maturation could be adopted as product innovations (Capaldo et al., 2017; Moeen and Agarwal, 2017). Along the same lines, biotech startup companies have become popular in recent years, propelled by collaborations between the industry and academia via various models of consultancy, contract research, and public-private partnerships (Pronk et al., 2015). Hence, we expect an increasing contribution of biotechnology-linked research to be published by management journals in the near future. Along the same line, the highly interdisciplinary nature
Table 2 The publication count and citation per publication of the top 20 most productive journal categories.
D
t2:2
E
t2:1
Current Research in Biotechnology xxx (xxxx) xxx
Fig. 2. Term map of biotechnology publications. There were 411 terms that appeared in >1% (n = 124) of the 12,351 publications published in 2017–2019 (until May) and extracted from Web of Science. The bubble size reflects how frequently a term was mentioned in the included publications (multiple mentioning in one publication counted as one only). The bubble color reflects how frequently a publication mentioning the term was cited on average. The distance between two bubbles reflects how frequently two terms were mentioned in the same publications. 4
236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266
A.W.K. Yeung et al.
Current Research in Biotechnology xxx (xxxx) xxx
290
Metabolic engineering was the second most prevalent author keyword, ranking in second place immediately after biotechnology, and the related term synthetic biology came in third place. Both author keywords and keywords added by WoS indicated that Escherichia coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae were the most frequently used organisms in biotechnology investigations, including biosynthesis of valuable biomolecules (Tables 4 and 5). E. coli is a highly popular model organism used in a range of biotechnology applications, such as in metabolic engineering, where it can be modified to produce valuable compounds via synthetic metabolic networks (Erb et al., 2017), such as myo-inositol (inositol) (You et al., 2017) and monoterpenes (Korman et al., 2017); and in genetic engineering, where the recently developed CRISPR and its associated genome-editing techniques yielded many follow-up studies that apply to diverse species (Burstein et al., 2017;
295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302
t3:1 t3:2
C
293 294
E
291 292
R
286 287
O R
284 285
810 (6.6%) 184 (1.5%) 171 (1.4%) 131 (1.1%) 112 (0.9%) 98 (0.8%) 93 (0.8%) 91 (0.7%) 91 (0.7%) 90 (0.7%) 81 (0.7%) 80 (0.6%) 80 (0.6%) 76 (0.6%) 76 (0.6%) 75 (0.6%) 72 (0.6%) 71 (0.6%) 70 (0.6%) 70 (0.6%) 65 (0.5%) 60 (0.5%) 59 (0.5%) 59 (0.5%) 56 (0.5%)
2.3 5.2 3.9 2.6 2.9 2.8 3.1 3.8 3.0 4.8 3.6 4.8 1.5 2.4 2.7 3.1 2.7 2.5 2.9 3.1 2.0 3.8 2.5 2.4 2.6
t4:4 t4:5 t4:6 t4:7 t4:8 t4:9 t4:10 t4:11 t4:12 t4:13 t4:14 t4:15 t4:16 t4:17 t4:18 t4:19 t4:20 t4:21 t4:22 t4:23 t4:24 t4:25 t4:26 t4:27 t4:28
F
3.5. Keywords
282 283
Biotechnology Metabolic engineering Synthetic biology Fermentation Microalgae Escherichia coli Cyanobacteria Bioremediation Saccharomyces cerevisiae Biocatalysis Nanoparticles Immobilization Innovation Gene expression Yeast Genome editing Bacteria Biomass Enzymes Nanotechnology Genetic engineering Biodegradation Lipase Protein engineering Industrial biotechnology
O
289
280 281
t4:3
R O
288
The term map revealed that many of the publications investigated the production (n = 3345; CPP = 3.0) or synthesis (n = 917; CPP = 3.6) of valuable biomolecules, e.g., via bacteria (n = 1328; CPP = 3.0) (Fig. 2). Biotechnology was applied to study/modify genes (n = 1831; CPP = 2.6) and enzymes (n = 1875; CPP = 3.2), and to create optimized or synthetic metabolic networks and pathways for the production of biomolecules. Some of the more cited terms included biosensor (n = 170; CPP = 5.9), microbe (n = 252; CPP = 5.1); biofuel (n = 236; CPP = 4.8), polymer (n = 335; CPP = 4.8), metabolic engineering (n = 238; CPP = 4.8), and nanotechnology (n = 194; CPP = 4.4). The 25 most frequently mentioned terms are mostly words with more general meaning (e.g., production, application, analysis) and are listed in Table 3.
278 279
2017 2018 2019 Citation count count count per (until publication May)
P
277
273 274
Total publication count (% of total)
306 68 50 57 23 39 34 30 44 39 27 30 30 33 31 21 18 31 32 32 19 13 6 20 16
351 90 87 52 65 43 45 42 38 35 32 36 41 35 26 36 37 32 26 26 34 32 22 24 31
134 22 28 19 23 14 13 13 7 14 17 10 9 6 16 15 14 8 9 11 12 10 10 14 7
D
3.4. Term map
271 272
t4:2
Keyword
Pawluk et al., 2018; Komor et al., 2017). Similarly, engineered S. cerevisiae is, for example, deployed to produce adipic acid, a useful monomer in nylon synthesis (Kruyer and Peralta-Yahya, 2017); astaxanthin, a keto-carotenoid which is a food colorant and potent antioxidant (Zhou et al., 2019); and also biofuels, such as ethanol, converted from xylose in agricultural residues and energy crops (Kwak and Jin, 2017; Jansen et al., 2017). Similarly, biotechnology applications can also be used for scaledup production of natural products that become successful drugs (Atanasov et al., 2015) or have other biomedical applications (Brahmi et al., 2018; Cătană et al., 2018; Eid et al., 2017; Ververidis et al., 2007). Biocatalysis was another popular topic, which relates to optimization of existing
303 304
Table 5 The top 25 recurring keywords added by Web of Science (Keywords Plus).
t5:1
E
276
269 270
t4:1
Table 4 The top 25 recurring author keywords.
T
275
of biotechnology-linked research is also well reflected in the first four articles accepted for publication in Current Research in Biotechnology, which are coming from entirely different research spheres, in particular representing an expert opinion on safety of genome edited crops (Lassoued et al., 2019), research describing the development of whole-cell bacterial electrochemical urea sensor (Cabrera et al., 2019), study on the potential of dietary supplementation with black pepper to improve blood lipid levels, and the development of copper oxide-loaded polyacrylonitrile nanofiber membranes for antimicrobial breath mask applications (Kim et al., 2019).
267 268
Table 3 The top 25 recurring terms from titles and abstracts.
305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313
t5:2
Term
Publication count (% of total)
Citation per publication
Keyword
Publication count (% of total)
Citation per publication
t5:3
t3:4 t3:5 t3:6 t3:7 t3:8 t3:9 t3:10 t3:11 t3:12 t3:13 t3:14 t3:15 t3:16 t3:17 t3:18 t3:19 t3:20 t3:21 t3:22 t3:23 t3:24 t3:25 t3:26 t3:27 t3:28
Study Biotechnology Production Application Analysis Activity Process Development System Use Effect Approach Protein Cell Condition Enzyme Gene Research Review Product Property Strain Technology Strategy Concentration
4509 (36.5%) 3680 (29.8%) 3345 (27.1%) 2977 (24.1%) 2907 (23.5%) 2647 (21.4%) 2635 (21.3%) 2577 (20.9%) 2462 (19.9%) 2194 (17.8%) 2124 (17.2%) 2120 (17.2%) 2057 (16.7%) 2012 (16.3%) 2011 (16.3%) 1875 (15.2%) 1831 (14.8%) 1758 (14.2%) 1678 (13.6%) 1656 (13.4%) 1625 (13.2%) 1624 (13.1%) 1617 (13.1%) 1592 (12.9%) 1525 (12.3%)
2.5 3.2 3.0 3.8 2.3 2.8 2.8 3.3 3.5 3.0 2.5 3.4 3.0 3.1 2.6 3.2 2.6 3.1 5.4 3.1 3.5 2.6 3.4 3.5 2.4
Escherichia coli Expression Biotechnology Identification Growth Purification Protein Saccharomyces cerevisiae In vitro Biosynthesis Gene-expression Gene Bacteria Optimization Fermentation Diversity Proteins System Performance Cells Nanoparticles Enzymes Evolution Degradation Acid
735 (6.0%) 716 (5.8%) 597 (4.8%) 517 (4.2%) 497 (4.0%) 490 (4.0%) 360 (2.9%) 340 (2.8%) 326 (2.6%) 312 (2.5%) 312 (2.5%) 300 (2.4%) 267 (2.2%) 266 (2.2%) 265 (2.1%) 256 (2.1%) 255 (2.1%) 234 (1.9%) 225 (1.8%) 224 (1.8%) 224 (1.8%) 216 (1.7%) 214 (1.7%) 212 (1.7%) 202 (1.6%)
3.9 2.3 1.8 2.1 2.2 1.9 2.2 4.1 3.6 2.9 3.6 2.6 2.7 2.0 2.5 2.1 2.3 2.9 1.7 2.6 3.3 2.8 3.1 2.5 2.9
t5:4 t5:5 t5:6 t5:7 t5:8 t5:9 t5:10 t5:11 t5:12 t5:13 t5:14 t5:15 t5:16 t5:17 t5:18 t5:19 t5:20 t5:21 t5:22 t5:23 t5:24 t5:25 t5:26 t5:27 t5:28
U
N C
t3:3
5
Current Research in Biotechnology xxx (xxxx) xxx
R O
O
F
A.W.K. Yeung et al.
Fig. 3. Structures of selected natural products with biotechnological relevance, which are discussed in the text.
332
We conducted a bibliometric analysis of the biotechnology research literature since 2017. Over 12,000 publications were identified and analyzed. Over 8500 institutions contributed to biotechnology publications during this period. The top 5 most productive institutions were scattered over France, China, the United States of America, Spain, and Brazil. Over 140 countries/regions contributed to biotechnology research, with the top 5 most productive ones being the United States of America, China, Germany, Brazil, and India. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering was the most productive journal in terms of numbers of publications, and E. coli and S. cerevisiae were frequently involved in the biotechnology investigations. The traditionally important theme of metabolic engineering was also among the most important biotechnology research topics of the analyzed time period (2017–2019), and nanoparticles/nanotechnology are contemporary trending biotechnology research themes. It is expected that genetic and metabolic engineering will continue to thrive to further improve the efficacy of biosynthesis of useful chemicals and bioremediation of environmental pollutants. When the 25 most frequent keywords for 2017, 2018, and 2019 were examined separately, we found that purification, genomics, fungi, laccase, and biofilm were on the list in 2017, but were replaced by protein engineering, thermostability, biofuels, innovative biotechnologies, and drug delivery in 2019. Biotechnology research as a whole will continue to make strong impact on the environment, medicine, agriculture, food, and other diverse industrial areas. With more advanced
333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354
C
E
R R
328 329
O
326 327
C
324 325
N
322 323
Funding
358
Atanas G. Atanasov acknowledges the support by the Polish KNOW (Leading National Research Centre) Scientific Consortium “Healthy Animal—Safe Food,” decision of Ministry of Science and Higher Education No. 05-1/KNOW2/2015. Atanas G. Atanasov and Nikolay T. Tzvetkov acknowledge the support by the Bulgarian National Science Fund (BNSF) under Grant No. KP-06-OPR 03/8. Marc Diederich's research at SNU is supported by National Research Foundation (NRF) [Grant Number 019R1A2C1009231] and by a grant from the MEST of Korea for Tumor Microenvironment Global Core Research Center (GCRC) [Grant Number 2011-0030001]. Support from Brain Korea (BK21) PLUS program and Creative-Pioneering Researchers Program at Seoul National University [Funding number: 370C-20160062] are acknowledged. Marc Diederich also thanks the “Recherche Cancer et Sang” foundation, “Recherches Scientifiques Luxembourg” association, “Een Häerz fir kriibskrank Kanner” association, Action LIONS “Vaincre le Cancer” association and Te ĺ e v ́ ie Luxembourg.
359
Declaration of competing interest
375
360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 Q6
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of 376 any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a po- 377 tential conflict of interest. 378
U
320 321
P
4. Conclusion
318 319
D
331
316 317
technology on protein engineering, biofuels, and drug delivery, it is ex- 355 pected that biotechnology will particularly create a greener environment, 356 and benefit human health. 357
T
330
enzymes, including their immobilization for improving their stability and multiple usages, to fit into predefined parameters for producing pharmaceuticals and commodity chemicals (Sheldon and Woodley, 2017). Biocatalysis is also a central theme in environmental and medical bioremediation research (Karigar and Rao, 2011; Mathieu et al., 2009). The chemical structures of some chemicals mentioned above are listed in Fig. 3. Both author keywords and keywords added by WoS indicated nanoparticles and nanotechnology to be trending research themes in the recent (since 2017) biotechnology literature. For instance, some relevant recent works from this area focused on the synthesis of nanofibers that could be applied in tissue engineering, drug delivery systems, and wound dressings (Haider et al., 2018). Important application-area of nanotechnology is also the use of engineered nanoparticle-mediated delivery of genes and biotherapeutic agents (Singh et al., 2017). Metal nanoparticles were also studied as additives to improve the combustion performance and stability of diesel engines (Saxena et al., 2017).
E
314 315
6
References
379
Adams, J., 2013. Collaborations: the fourth age of research. Nature 497, 557–560. Amarakoon, I., Hamilton, C., Mitchell, S., Tennant, P., Roye, M., 2017. Chapter 28 - biotechnology. Pharmacognosy: Fundamentals, Applications and Strategies. Academic Press, pp. 549–563. Atanasov, A.G., Waltenberger, B., Pferschy-Wenzig, E.-M., Linder, T., Wawrosch, C., Uhrin, P., Temml, V., Wang, L., Schwaiger, S., Heiss, E.H., 2015. Discovery and resupply of pharmacologically active plant-derived natural products: a review. Biotechnol. Adv. 33, 1582–1614. Barcelos, M.C., Lupki, F.B., Campolina, G.A., Nelson, D.L., Molina, G., 2018. The colors of biotechnology: general overview and developments of white, green and blue areas. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 365, fny239. Beopoulos, A., Cescut, J., Haddouche, R., Uribelarrea, J.-L., Molina-Jouve, C., Nicaud, J.-M., 2009. Yarrowia lipolytica as a model for bio-oil production. Prog. Lipid Res. 48, 375–387.
380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392
A.W.K. Yeung et al.
D
P
R O
O
F
Kwak, S., Jin, Y.-S., 2017. Production of fuels and chemicals from xylose by engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a review and perspective. Microb. Cell Factories 16, 82. Lassoued, R., et al., 2019. Risk and safety considerations of genome edited crops: expert opinion. Current Research in Biotechnology https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crbiot.2019.1008.1001 (Accepted). Magnusson, M.K., Hursti, U.-K.K., 2002. Consumer attitudes towards genetically modified foods. Appetite 39, 9–24. Mathieu, J.M., Schloendorn, J., Rittmann, B.E., Alvarez, P.J., 2009. Medical bioremediation of age-related diseases. Microb. Cell Factories 8, 21. Moeen, M., Agarwal, R., 2017. Incubation of an industry: heterogeneous knowledge bases and modes of value capture. Strateg. Manag. J. 38, 566–587. Pawar, R.S., Krynitsky, A.J., Rader, J.I., 2013. Sweeteners from plants—with emphasis on Stevia rebaudiana (Bertoni) and Siraitia grosvenorii (Swingle). Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 405, 4397–4407. Pawluk, A., Davidson, A.R., Maxwell, K.L., 2018. Anti-CRISPR: discovery, mechanism and function. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 16, 12–17. Pronk, J.T., Lee, S.Y., Lievense, J., Pierce, J., Palsson, B., Uhlen, M., Nielsen, J., 2015. How to set up collaborations between academia and industrial biotech companies. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 237–240. Saxena, V., Kumar, N., Saxena, V.K., 2017. A comprehensive review on combustion and stability aspects of metal nanoparticles and its additive effect on diesel and biodiesel fuelled CI engine. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 70, 563–588. Sheldon, R.A., Woodley, J.M., 2017. Role of biocatalysis in sustainable chemistry. Chem. Rev. 118, 801–838. Singh, B.N., Gupta, V.K., Chen, J., Atanasov, A.G., 2017. Organic nanoparticle-based combinatory approaches for gene therapy. Trends Biotechnol. 35, 1121–1124. Taheri, F., Azadi, H., D'Haese, M., 2017. A world without hunger: organic or GM crops? Sustainability 9, 580. van Eck, N.J., Waltman, L., 2009. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics 84, 523–538. Vendruscolo, F., da Rocha Ferreira, G.L., Antoniosi Filho, N.R., 2017. Biosorption of hexavalent chromium by microorganisms. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegradation 119, 87–95. Ververidis, F., Trantas, E., Douglas, C., Vollmer, G., Kretzschmar, G., Panopoulos, N., 2007. Biotechnology of flavonoids and other phenylpropanoid-derived natural products. Part II: reconstruction of multienzyme pathways in plants and microbes. Biotechnology Journal: Healthcare Nutrition Technology 2, 1235–1249. Yeung, A.W.K., Goto, T.K., Leung, W.K., 2017. The changing landscape of neuroscience research, 2006–2015: a bibliometric study. Front. Neurosci. 11, 120. Yeung, A.W.K., Aggarwal, B., Barreca, D., Battino, M., Belwal, T., Horbańczuk, O., BerindanNeagoe, I., Bishayee, A., Daglia, M., Devkota, H., et al., 2018a. Dietary natural products and their potential to influence health and disease including animal model studies. Anim. Sci. Paper Rep. 36, 345–358. Yeung, A.W.K., Tzvetkov, N.T., Atanasov, A.G., 2018b. When neuroscience meets pharmacology: a neuropharmacology literature analysis. Front. Neurosci. 12, 852. Yeung, A.W.K., Tzvetkov, N.T., Zengin, G., Wang, D., Xu, S., Mitrović, G., Brnčić, M., Dall'Acqua, S., Pirgozliev, V., Kijjoa, A., et al., 2019a. The berries on the top. Journal of Berry Research 9, 125–139. Yeung, A.W.K., Horbańczuk, M., Tzvetkov, N.T., Mocan, A., Carradori, S., Maggi, F., Marchewka, J., Sut, S., Dall'Acqua, S., Gan, R.-Y., et al., 2019b. Curcumin: total-scale analysis of the scientific literature. Molecules 24, 1393. Yeung, A.W.K., Aggarwal, B.B., Orhan, I.E., Horbańczuk, O.K., Barreca, D., Battino, M., Belwal, T., Bishayee, A., Daglia, M., Devkota, H.P., et al., 2019c. Resveratrol, a popular dietary supplement for human and animal health: quantitative research literature analysis - a review. Anim. Sci. Paper Rep. 37, 103–118. You, C., Shi, T., Li, Y., Han, P., Zhou, X., Zhang, Y.H.P., 2017. An in vitro synthetic biology platform for the industrial biomanufacturing of myo-inositol from starch. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 114, 1855–1864. Zhou, P., Li, M., Shen, B., Yao, Z., Bian, Q., Ye, L., Yu, H., 2019. Directed coevolution of βcarotene ketolase and hydroxylase and its application in temperature-regulated biosynthesis of astaxanthin. J. Agric. Food Chem. 67, 1072–1080.
E
T
C
E
R
O R
N C
514
Brahmi, F., Vejux, A., Sghaier, R., Zarrouk, A., Nury, T., Meddeb, W., Rezig, L., Namsi, A., Sassi, K., Yammine, A., 2018. Prevention of 7-ketocholesterol-induced side effects by natural compounds. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 1–20. Bud, R., 1994. History of ‘biotechnology’. Nature 337, 10. Burstein, D., Harrington, L.B., Strutt, S.C., Probst, A.J., Anantharaman, K., Thomas, B.C., Doudna, J.A., Banfield, J.F., 2017. New CRISPR–Cas systems from uncultivated microbes. Nature 542, 237–241. Cabrera, C., et al., 2019. Electrochemical Proteus vulgaris whole cell urea sensor in synthetic urine. Current Research in Biotechnology https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crbiot.2019.1007.1002 (Accepted). Capaldo, A., Lavie, D., Messeni Petruzzelli, A., 2017. Knowledge maturity and the scientific value of innovations: the roles of knowledge distance and adoption. J. Manag. 43, 503–533. Cătană, C.-S., Atanasov, A.G., Berindan-Neagoe, I., 2018. Natural products with anti-aging potential: affected targets and molecular mechanisms. Biotechnol. Adv. 36, 1649–1656. Chenthamarakshan, A., Parambayil, N., Miziriya, N., Soumya, P., Lakshmi, M.K., Ramgopal, A., Dileep, A., Nambisan, P., 2017. Optimization of laccase production from Marasmiellus palmivorus LA1 by Taguchi method of design of experiments. BMC Biotechnol. 17, 12. Colson, G., Rousu, M.C., 2013. What do consumer surveys and experiments reveal and conceal about consumer preferences for genetically modified foods? GM Crops & Food 4, 158–165. Dalpé, R., 2002. Bibliometric analysis of biotechnology. Scientometrics 55, 189–213. de Almeida, L.G., de Moraes, L.A.B., Trigo, J.R., Omoto, C., Cônsoli, F.L., 2017. The gut microbiota of insecticide-resistant insects houses insecticide-degrading bacteria: a potential source for biotechnological exploitation. PLoS One 12, e0174754. Duarte, J.H., de Morais, E.G., Radmann, E.M., Costa, J.A.V., 2017. Biological CO2 mitigation from coal power plant by Chlorella fusca and Spirulina sp. Bioresour. Technol. 234, 472–475. Eid, H.M., Wright, M.L., Anil Kumar, N., Qawasmeh, A., Hassan, S.T., Mocan, A., Nabavi, S.M., Rastrelli, L., Atanasov, A.G., Haddad, P.S., 2017. Significance of microbiota in obesity and metabolic diseases and the modulatory potential by medicinal plant and food ingredients. Front. Pharmacol. 8, 387. Erb, T.J., Jones, P.R., Bar-Even, A., 2017. Synthetic metabolism: metabolic engineering meets enzyme design. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 37, 56–62. Gartland, K., Bruschi, F., Dundar, M., Gahan, P., Magni, M.V., Akbarova, Y., 2013. Progress towards the ‘golden age’ of biotechnology. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 24, S6–S13. Haider, A., Haider, S., Kang, I.-K., 2018. A comprehensive review summarizing the effect of electrospinning parameters and potential applications of nanofibers in biomedical and biotechnology. Arab. J. Chem. 11, 1165–1188. Jansen, M.L., Bracher, J.M., Papapetridis, I., Verhoeven, M.D., de Bruijn, H., de Waal, P.P., van Maris, A.J., Klaassen, P., Pronk, J.T., 2017. Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains for secondgeneration ethanol production: from academic exploration to industrial implementation. FEMS Yeast Res. 17, fox044. Karaffa, L., Kubicek, C.P., 2003. Aspergillus niger citric acid accumulation: do we understand this well working black box? Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 61, 189–196. Karigar, C.S., Rao, S.S., 2011. Role of microbial enzymes in the bioremediation of pollutants: a review. Enzyme Research 2011, 805187. Kennedy, M.J., 1991. The evolution of the word ‘biotechnology’. Trends Biotechnol. 9, 218–220. Kim, I., et al., 2019. Copper oxide (CuO) loaded polyacrylonitrile (PAN) nanofiber membranes for antimicrobial breath mask applications. Current Research in Biotechnology https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.crbiot.2019.1007.1001 (Accepted). Komor, A.C., Badran, A.H., Liu, D.R., 2017. CRISPR-based technologies for the manipulation of eukaryotic genomes. Cell 168, 20–36. Korman, T.P., Opgenorth, P.H., Bowie, J.U., 2017. A synthetic biochemistry platform for cell free production of monoterpenes from glucose. Nat. Commun. 8, 15526. Kruyer, N.S., Peralta-Yahya, P., 2017. Metabolic engineering strategies to bio-adipic acid production. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 45, 136–143. Kuppusamy, S., Sethurajan, M., Kadarkarai, M., Aruliah, R., 2017. Biodecolourization of textile dyes by novel, indigenous Pseudomonas stutzeri MN1 and Acinetobacter baumannii MN3. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 5, 716–724.
U
393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453
Current Research in Biotechnology xxx (xxxx) xxx
7
454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513