REVIEW
Cutaneous side effects of antietumor necrosis factor biologic therapy: A clinical review Aikaterini-Evaggelia Moustou, MD,a Athina Matekovits, MD,a Clio Dessinioti, MD,a Christina Antoniou, MD,a Petros P. Sfikakis, MD,b and Alexander J. Stratigos, MDa Athens, Greece Background: Anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) biologic agents have been associated with a number of adverse events. Objective: To review the cutaneous reactions that have been reported in patients receiving anti-TNF therapy. Methods: We performed a systematic MEDLINE search of relevant publications, including case reports and case series. Results: Reported cutaneous events included infusion and injection site reactions, psoriasiform eruptions, lupus-like disorders, vasculitis, granulomatous reactions, cutaneous infections, and cutaneous neoplasms. Infusion reactions and injection site reactions were definitely associated with anti-TNF administration, whereas all other events had a varying strength of association and severity, not necessarily requiring drug discontinuation. Limitations: Most information was derived from spontaneous case reports, where ascertainment biases and frequency of reporting may impair detection methodology and causal relationships. Conclusions: As anti-TNF biologic agents are progressively being used in clinical practice, cutaneous adverse events will be encountered more frequently. Until more data are accumulated with respect to their pathogenesis and potential association with anti-TNF therapy, dermatologists should become more familiar with the clinical presentation and management of such events. ( J Am Acad Dermatol 2009;61:486-504.)
INTRODUCTION Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) is the name attributed to a distinct group of naturally occurring cytokines, possessing important anti-tumor and immune-regulating properties. Two distinct members of the TNF family are TNF-alfa and TNF-beta. TNFalfa, initially referred to as cachectin,1 is a ubiquitous molecule, produced by a wide variety of cells in different tissues, whereas TNF-beta (also known as lymphotoxin-alfa) is produced mainly by activated lymphocytes.2 From the 1st Department of Dermatology, Andreas Sygros Hospital,a and the 1st Department of Propaedeutic and Internal Medicine, Laiko General Hospital,b University of Athens Medical School. Funding sources: None. Conflicts of interest: None declared. Reprint requests: Alexander J. Stratigos, MD, Andreas Sygros Hospital, 5 Dragoumi Street, Athens 10671, Greece. E-mail:
[email protected]. Published online July 23, 2009. 0190-9622/$36.00 ª 2009 by the American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2008.10.060
486
Abbreviations used: AD: ANA: CD: CTCL: DMARD: dsDNA: HR: IGD: LCV: LE: NMSC: PUVA: RA: SLE: TNF: UVB:
atopic dermatitis antinuclear antibody Crohn’s disease cutaneous T-cell lymphoma disease-modifying antirheumatic drug double-stranded DNA hazard ratio interstitial granulomatous dermatitis leukocytoclastic vasculitis lupus erythematosus non-melanoma skin cancer psoralen and ultraviolet A light rheumatoid arthritis systemic lupus erythematosus tumor necrosis factor ultraviolet B light
TNF-alfa is a significant regulator of apoptosis and an important proinflammatory cytokine with pleiotropic actions.3 Dysregulation of TNF-alfa production has been associated with the pathogenesis of various inflammatory disorders, such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), inflammatory bowel disease, ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis, and psoriasis. In an effort to down-regulate the effects of TNF-alfa excess
Moustou et al 487
J AM ACAD DERMATOL VOLUME 61, NUMBER 3
production in these diseases, a new category of biologic agents, designated as anti-TNF agents, has been recently developed and used in clinical practice. Currently, more than 1,500,000 patients have been treated with the 3 licensed agents—etanercept, infliximab, and adalimumab (recently a fourth antiTNF agent, CIMZIA, was approved for the treatment of RA). Etanercept is a dimeric fusion protein composed of two soluble TNF receptor type 1 molecules linked to the Fc portion of an IgG1,4 which neutralizes the soluble forms of both TNF-alfa and TNFbeta, imitating the inhibitory effects of naturally occurring soluble TNF receptors. Infliximab is a chimeric monoclonal antibody, composed of the variable region of a murine anti-human TNF-alfa antibody fused to the constant region of a human IgG1,5 whereas adalimumab is a totally human recombinant IgG1 monoclonal antibody.6 Both agents bind the soluble as well as the transmembrane form of TNF-alfa, without neutralizing TNF-beta. Moreover, the two monoclonal anti-TNF antibodies have been shown to induce lysis of the cells expressing transmembrane TNF-alfa in vitro.7 Randomized placebo-controlled trials of anti-TNF agents have demonstrated their efficacy and safety in the treatment of rheumatic diseases, Crohn’s disease (CD), and psoriasis. Nevertheless, certain untoward reactions have been documented, namely, opportunistic infections, reactivation of latent tuberculosis, lupus-like syndrome, demyelinating disease, and heart failure.8-12 There are scarce data on cutaneous adverse events occurring during biologic anti-TNF therapy. Indeed, most information comes from isolated case reports or case series, while randomized controlled or retrospective studies often fail to address in detail all cutaneous adverse events that develop during anti-TNF treatment. The objective of this study was to perform a literature-based review of the cutaneous reactions that have been reported with infliximab, etanercept, or adalimumab treatment for a variety of chronic inflammatory disorders. We also sought to provide an assessment of the frequency and strength of association of each such reaction with the use of anti-TNF agents and discuss their clinical presentation, pathogenic mechanisms and management.
METHODS We performed a MEDLINE search of all cutaneous events reported in association with anti-TNF treatment. Randomized controlled studies, open-label studies, retrospective studies, meta-analyses, case series, and case reports published through July 2008, and reporting cutaneous reactions during anti-TNF treatment have been the main sources of our
investigation. The search terms used were as follows: infliximab, etanercept, adalimumab, CD, psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, Adamantiades-Behc¸et’s disease, juvenile idiopathic arthritis, ulcerative colitis, cutaneous adverse effects, lupus, infections, granulomatous reactions, eczema, lymphoma, melanoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and basal cell carcinoma. In addition, we attempted a critical appraisal of the strength of association between the reported adverse events and the use of an anti-TNF agent. Several criteria were used in order to classify the cutaneous reactions during anti-TNF treatment in 4 groups, namely, ‘‘definitely associated’’, ‘‘strongly associated’’, ‘‘moderately associated’’, and ‘‘poorly associated’’. These criteria included (1) the type of study reporting the adverse event, that is, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, prospective or retrospective studies of large-groups of treated patients, case series or case reports; (2) the number of anti-TNF agents that have been reported in association with the specific event (one vs two vs all 3 agents); (3) the number of inflammatory disorders treated with antiTNF agents in which such events have occurred; and (4) whether discontinuing the medication led to resolution of the side-effect (de-challenge) and, conversely, whether re-challenge with the same agent led to reappearance of the event.
RESULTS A total of 91 studies were found reporting a cutaneous eruption or condition developing during anti-TNF treatment. Each type of reaction is discussed thoroughly below, based on reported evidence. A summary of all cutaneous eruptions is provided in Table I. Cutaneous adverse events of anti-TNF agents can be classified according to their clinical presentation and/or histologic features. Apart from infusion reactions related to the intravenous administration of infliximab, and injection site reactions specifically encountered with the subcutaneous injection of etanercept and adalimumab, all other adverse events mentioned below have been observed with at least one of the 3 anti-TNF agents currently in clinical use. In Table I, we describe in detail the reported cutaneous events, their estimated frequencies and the strength of association, based on the criteria described in the Methods section. Definite associations were demonstrated for infusion/injection site reactions, whereas psoriasis and psoriasiform lesions, lupuslike syndromes, vasculitis, and cutaneous infections were found to be strongly associated with anti-TNF agents. A moderate association was apparent between anti-TNF treatment and eczematous reactions, lichenoid reactions, and granulomatous diseases,
Cutaneous adverse events
Infusion reactions Acute
Delayed
Injection site reactions
Rechallenge
Strength of association
1
Definite
Clinical outcome
Type of study
Infl
All indications
Multiple RCT
\5% of infusions
Infl
All indications
Multiple RCT
\1% of infusions
Etan, Adal
All indications
Resolution w/ reduction of infusion rate, systemic administration of antihistamines and/or corticosteroids. Discontinuation of tx in \1%, if severe reactions occur Resolution and prevention of relapses w/ concomitant administration of systemic immunosuppressives (MTX, Aza). Prevention w/ regular infusions during maintenance tx Self-limited. Decrease in frequency w/ continuation of tx. ‘‘Recall’’ reactions may occur.
RCT
;10% of patients
1
Definite
Infl, Etan, Adal
All indications
Resolution w/ either topical tx, UVB or PUVA, or anti-TNF discontinuation
\1% of patients
1
Strong
Infl, Etan, Adal
All indications
Resolution w/ either topical tx, or discontinuation
Prospective controlled studies38,46 Prospective study45 Case series43 Multiple case reports Prospective controlled study38 Prospective study45
Unknown
Definite
Moderate/strong
SEPTEMBER 2009
Eczema
Estimated frequency
Disease
J AM ACAD DERMATOL
Papulopustular eruptions Psoriasis, psoriasiform eruptions
Drug
488 Moustou et al
Table I. Reported cutaneous adverse events of anti-TNF-alfa treatment
Vasculitis LCV
Granulomatous reactions Granuloma annulare
Cutaneous infections Bacterial infections (skin and soft tissue)
RA, AS
Resolution w/ discontinuation and/or systemic corticosteroids
Case reports83,84
Infl, Etan, Adal
Rheumatic diseases, CD
Resolution w/ discontinuation and/or systemic corticosteroids, anti-malarial agents, or immunosuppressive agents
Infl, Etan, Adal
All indications
Infl, Etan, Adal
Infl, Etan, Adal
1
Retrospective studies68 Case series73 Multiple case reports
\0.5% of patients
1
Resolution w/ discontinuation and/or systemic corticosteroids, immunosuppressive agents
Prospective controlled study38 Case series73 Retrospective study75
\0.5% of patients
RA
Resolution w/ topical corticosteroids; antiTNF discontinuation was necessary in only 2 patients out of 9
Retrospective study94
\5% of patients
All indications
Resolution w/ appropriate tx
Prospective controlled study38 Prospective study45 Prospective controlled study100,107 Retrospective study99 RCT108,109
\5% of patients
Moderate (limited experience)
Strong
Strong
Poor/moderate
Strong
Continued
Moustou et al 489
Unknown
J AM ACAD DERMATOL
Autoimmune skin disorders LE (systemic, subacute, discoid types)
Infl, Etan, Adal
VOLUME 61, NUMBER 3
Lichenoid drug reactions
Cutaneous adverse events
Drug
Disease
Clinical outcome
Type of study
Estimated frequency
Rechallenge
Strength of association
Resolution after appropriate tx
Retrospective study99 Case reports111,112
Extremely rare
Infl, Etan, Adal
Rheumatic diseases, CD Rheumatic diseases
Resolution w/ appropriate tx
\8%
Strong
Infl, Etan, Adal
Rheumatic diseases
Resolution w/ appropriate tx
Prospective controlled study38 Prospective study45 Prospective controlled study38 Prospective study45 Prospective controlled study107 RCT108
1%-2% of patients
Strong
Infl, Etan
Psoriasis, PsA, AS, CD
Case reports125-128,130
Lymphomatoid papulosiselike eruption
Adal
RA
Systemic ALCL w/ cutaneous involvement Se´zary syndrome
Infl
CD
Improvement after tx discontinuation, death Spontaneous resolution; development of non-Hodgkin ALCL 2 years later Death
Case report126
Poor
Infl
AS
Case report129
Poor
Infl, Etan, Adal
RA, psoriasis
Partial remission w/ infliximab discontinuation and MTX tx Excision
Prospective controlled study38 Retrospective controlled study138 RCT22,139 Case reports131-133
Poor
Non-tuberculosis mycobacterial skin infection Fungal infections
Herpesvirus infections (HSV 1, 2 e VZV)
Cutaneous malignant neoplasms Lymphomas CTCL
NMSC
Infl
Prospective study38
490 Moustou et al
Table I. Cont’d
Moderate/strong
Poor
1 event/289 RA patients
Poor
SEPTEMBER 2009
J AM ACAD DERMATOL
Moustou et al 491
J AM ACAD DERMATOL
CD, psoriasis Infl, Etan
Adal, Adalimumab; ALCL, anaplastic large-cell lymphoma; AS, ankylosing spondylitis; Aza, azathioprine; CD, Crohn’s disease; CTCL, cutaneous T-cell lymphoma; Etan, etanercept; HSV, herpes simplex virus; Infl, infliximab; MTX, methotrexate; NMSC, non-melanoma skin cancer; PsA, psoriatic arthritis; RA, rheumatoid arthritis; RCT, randomized controlled trial; TNF, tumor necrosis factor; tx, therapy/treatment; VZV, varicella-zoster virus; w/, with.
Case reports145
Poor Poor Case report132 RA Infl
Keratoacanthoma Benign cutaneous neoplasms Eruptive nevomelanocytic nevi
Melanoma
Etan, Adal
Psoriasis, RA
Tx w/ isolated limb chemotherapy in one patient, lymph node dissection in second patient Discontinuation
RCT: 1 case35 Case reports143
Poor
VOLUME 61, NUMBER 3
whereas cutaneous lymphomas, non-melanoma skin cancers, and melanoma, mainly described in case reports, were poorly linked to anti-TNF treatment. Infusion reactions Monoclonal antibodies injected for therapeutic reasons in humans generate anti-globulin responses directed against these ‘‘non-self’’ proteins.12 These responses appear to be directly linked to the development of infusion reactions and to the reduced clinical efficacy in treated patients.13-15 Infusion reactions have been consistently documented with the intravenous administration of infliximab.11,16-20 Measurable serum concentrations of anti-infliximab antibodies are detected in most patients who present with infusion related reactions.15,21 Adverse events occurring during the infusion or in the first 24 hours following the infusion are defined as acute reactions, whereas those manifesting 24 hours to 14 days postinfusion are considered to be delayed-type reactions. Acute reactions occur in approximately 3% to 6% of treated patients with infliximab.11,18,21,22 These reactions are classified as mild, moderate, or severe depending on the assessment of the patient’s vital signs and symptoms, which typically consist of hypotension or hypertension, chest pain, palpitations, dyspnea, fever, skin eruptions, headache, nausea, and vomiting.19,20 Cutaneous symptoms may vary from a burning sensation with minimal erythema, to a flushing and/or urticarial rash. Lobel, Korelitz, and Warman23 have reported a ‘‘red-man syndrome’’elike reaction to infliximab, similar to the one observed with the rapid infusion of vancomycin. Fewer than 1% of these reactions are severe enough to interrupt treatment and to require immediate intervention. In most cases, reduction of infusion rate leads to the resolution of the symptoms.17 The pathogenic mechanism underlying the vast majority of these reactions is considered to be of a nonimmune-mediated type, rather than a true anaphylactic response.14,18 Therefore, in cases of mild or moderate infusion reactions, the drug has been subsequently re-administered under certain routine prophylactic measures, such as premedication with antihistamines and/or corticosteroids and adjustment of the infusion rate.18,20 Overall, acute infliximabinduced infusion reactions have become significantly less common during the past 5 years, most probably because of the increasing experience and awareness of treating physicians.24 Delayed-type infusion reactions occur in approximately 1% to 2.8% of infliximab-treated patients, manifesting as ‘‘serum sickness’’elike reactions and presenting with fatigue, myalgias, arthralgias,
492 Moustou et al
J AM ACAD DERMATOL SEPTEMBER 2009
headache, fever, facial edema, and urticarial eruption.11,18,22 These reactions are deemed to be immune mediated, usually type III hypersensitivity reactions. Antibodies to infliximab are increasingly implicated in their pathogenesis, as most of the patients experiencing delayed-type infusion reactions have increased titers of anti-infliximab antibodies.20,21 Furthermore, a decrease in clinical response has been observed in these patients, probably related to the neutralizing action of antibodies generated against infliximab.15,21 A number of approaches have been implemented in an effort to establish an immune tolerance against infliximab, including the concomitant administration of immunosuppressive drugs (methotrexate or azathioprine) and maintenance therapy with regular infusions every 8 weeks, avoiding long intervals between sequential infliximab infusions.15,20 It is worth mentioning that anti-etanercept antibodies have also been isolated in the sera of patients undergoing treatment with this agent, but they do not seem to be related to any adverse reaction, nor do they influence the clinical response.25 Adalimumab has also been proposed as an alternative therapeutic option in patients presenting with infusion reactions to infliximab,26-28 although long-term data are required to determine its immunogenicity.29 Injection site reactions The subcutaneous administration of etanercept may cause an injection site reaction manifested by mild to moderate erythema, itching, tenderness, and/or swelling. This kind of local reaction occurs in 10% to 20% of patients during the first month of treatment and usually decreases in frequency with the continuation of therapy.30-32 A small percentage of patients receiving etanercept develop relapses of local reactions (‘‘recall reactions’’) at the site of previous injections, when subsequent injections are given.33 Histologic and immunophenotypic studies reveal a superficial perivascular lymphocytic infiltrate composed mostly of CD4-positive (CD41) lymphocytes in the case of injection-site reactions and CD81 lymphocytes in recall-site reactions.30 Similar manifestations at the injection sites of adalimumab have been documented at a rate of 6% to 12% of treated patients.34,35 Psoriasis and psoriasiform eruptions A vast number of case reports and case series describing the appearance of either psoriasiform eruptions or typical psoriasis of different clinical subtypes have been reported in patients treated with anti-TNF agents for various inflammatory conditions, such as rheumatoid arthritis, CD, ankylosing
spondylitis, and Adamandiades-Behc¸et’s disease.36-45 Plaque-type psoriasis, guttate psoriasis, palmoplantar pustulosis, psoriasis of the nail and scalp have all been described in the context of anti-TNF treatment. Reports in the literature are of wide heterogeneity concerning the type of agent, underlying disease, treatment duration, type of eruption, and presence or absence of personal or family history of psoriasis. In a recent review, Wollina et al43 identified 120 published cases in which patients developed psoriasis under anti-TNF therapy, including 37 with palmoplantar pustulosis and 73 with different types of psoriasis. Most of these patients had rheumatoid arthritis (n = 61) while the rest had ankylosing spondylitis, psoriasis, CD, SAPHO syndrome, psoriatic arthritis, and other diseases. A positive personal or family history was noted in 25 and 8 patients, respectively, leaving a significant portion of patients with no previous disease association or family history. In a recent prospective study of 9826 patients included in the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register, 25 cases of RA were diagnosed with new onset of psoriasis as a consequence of antiTNF treatment for RA.46 In the comparison group of 2880 patients treated with traditional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs, none developed psoriasis during the same observation period, although ascertainment and misclassification biases as well as differences in detection methodology may have influenced the results. Fifty percent of patients who developed psoriasis had been treated with adalimumab, whereas 25% were treated with either infliximab or etanercept indicating an anti-TNF-related class-effect rather than a drug-specific type of hypersensitivity.46 The lesions appear with the typical psoriatic morphology, consisting of scaly erythematous plaques on the trunk, extremities, or scalp. New onset of nail psoriasis has also been noted, presenting as nail pitting, onycholysis, nail discoloration, and/or subungual keratosis. The most characteristic pattern of psoriasis associated with anti-TNF-alfa treatment, however, is a localized pustular eruption occurring symmetrically on the palms and soles, resembling palmoplantar pustulosis. The eruption has been reported in approximately one third of all reported cases and consists of painful or itchy pustular lesions based on erythematous areas of the acral sites, with or without concomitant psoriatic plaques or pustular lesions in other cutaneous sites. On the basis of histology, the reported cases of psoriasis developing under anti-TNF treatment have the typical features of the disease, including epidermal hyperplasia, parakeratosis, elongation of the rete ridges, dilated capillaries in the dermis, perivascular infiltration
J AM ACAD DERMATOL
Moustou et al 493
VOLUME 61, NUMBER 3
and, in the case of pustular eruptions, an intraepidermal collection of neutrophiles. In certain cases, however, the histology of the lesions had distinct lichenoid features.47-49 Verea et al47 reported a patient suffering from CD in whom a psoriasiform eruption developed. Histologic examination revealed infiltration by lymphocytes and histiocytes of a lichenoid pattern accompanied by focal necrotic keratinocytes.49 A lichenoid-type histology was also reported by Senechal et al,48,49 who described a CD8-positive inflammatory infiltration in 3 patients with psoriasiform eruption after anti-TNF treatment. Certain features of the anti-TNF-induced psoriasiform manifestations are reminiscent of Reiter’s syndrome. A patient with CD and ankylosing spondyloarthropathy treated with adalimumab and leflunomide developed a psoriasiform rash involving the groin, axillary folds, trunk, and periumbilical region, in combination with circinate balanitis, and plantar keratoderma. Histologic findings were consistent with a psoriasiform pattern, and the skin lesions regressed after doxycycline treatment and topical steroids.50 Overall, the reported cases of psoriasis or psoriasiform eruptions have differed with respect to their severity and treatment response. In most cases, topical treatment was sufficient to control the eruption.36,38-40,42,44 In other cases, psoralens and ultraviolet A treatment or UVB phototherapy were initiated,42,44 while, in more severe or persistent cases, discontinuation of anti-TNF therapy or switching to an alternative anti-TNF regimen was necessary.36,38,41,43,44 The improvement of the eruption after discontinuation of the anti-TNF agent in some cases and relapse upon re-treatment with the same agent (positive rechallenge) further supports the causal association of anti-TNF agents with the development of psoriasiform eruptions.36 Eczema-dermatitis Eczematous skin lesions have been reported with the use of anti-TNF therapy for rheumatic diseases. In the prospective study of Flendrie et al, which included 289 patients with RA on TNF-alfa blocking therapy, 20 cases of eczema were documented, 5 of which were confirmed by histopathology. These cases included dyshidrotic eczema, contact dermatitis, nummular eczema, atopic dermatitis, papular lesions, and a nonspecific eruption.38 Lee et al45 conducted a prospective study in 135 patients with rheumatic diseases treated with anti-TNF agents and observed 35 patients with cutaneous adverse events. Seven of these developed an eczematoid eruption and one of them presented with atopic dermatitis (AD). Additional cases of AD-like reactions have
been reported in several patients receiving anti-TNF agents.51,52 Two other patients with psoriasis who were receiving infliximab treatment developed severe AD after the sixth infusion and the seventh infusion, respectively.53 In most cases, eczema-like reactions occurring in the context of anti-TNF therapy were of moderate intensity and responded well to topical treatment with topical steroids, alone or in combination with calcineurin inhibitors, with no need to discontinue anti-TNF treatment. Severe cases, however, necessitating hospitalization or discontinuation of therapy have been described.38 A patient with psoriasis receiving infliximab therapy developed a severe atopic dermatitiselike eruption complicated by impetigo. Infliximab was discontinued, and the patient responded well to antibiotics and cyclosporine.53 A young patient with juvenile idiopathic arthritis and a history of AD, who was receiving etanercept therapy, also developed a severe flare of dermatitis and had to discontinue treatment.54 Drug-induced lupus erythematosus Patients receiving anti-TNF therapy often develop antinuclear antibodies (ANAs), antibodies against double-stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) and against single-stranded DNA, but rarely manifest clinical symptoms of lupus erythematosus (LE).55-58 The initial presence of positive ANA titers in some patients, before the commencement of anti-TNF therapy, has been associated with an increased frequency of subsequent anti-dsDNA positivity, mainly of the IgM class and most commonly after infliximab treatment.16,59,60 According to Atzeni et al,61 administration of infliximab leads to the induction of ANA in 63.8% of patients with RA and 49.1% of those with CD, while anti-dsDNA antibodies become measurable in 13% of RA patients and in 21.5% of CD patients, respectively. Etanercept therapy induces ANA and anti-dsDNA in 11% and 15% of RA patients, respectively.61 Clinical trials using adalimumab in RA patients have demonstrated a prevalence of 5.3% in ANA positivity and 12.9% in anti-dsDNA positivity.61 In the study by Gottlieb et al,62 conducted in psoriatic patients receiving infliximab, ANA and anti-dsDNA antibodies were induced in 25% and 4.3% of the cases, respectively. In a recent cohort study of 28 psoriatic patients with severe recalcitrant disease, an increase in ANA titers after 22 weeks of infliximab therapy was reported in 72% of the patients, compared with only 12% at baseline. Anti-dsDNA IgM increased in 68% of patients, whereas anti-dsDNA IgG did not show a statistically significant elevation.63 In symptomatic patients, anti-TNF-induced lupus manifests as systemic, subacute cutaneous or discoid
494 Moustou et al
J AM ACAD DERMATOL SEPTEMBER 2009
lupus erythematosus.64-72 The clinical and laboratory findings of drug-induced lupus are similar to those of the idiopathic disease; however, central nervous system and kidney involvement are extremely rare.65 In a recent French national survey conducted in more than 11,000 patients receiving either infliximab or etanercept for rheumatic diseases, the incidence of drug-induced lupus was found to be the same for both agents (approx 0.18%). Of the 25 cases reported as having lupus, only 12 patients fulfilled at least 4 of the SLE criteria proposed by the American College of Rheumatology, while the other 10, who presented solely with cutaneous involvement, were classified as having a ‘‘limited skin lupus’’ or ‘‘toxicodermia’’.68 All reported cases were seropositive for ANA and anti-dsDNA antibodies. Cutaneous manifestations consisted of malar rash, increased photosensitivity, urticarial rash, purpura, alopecia, and perniosis.68 In other case reports, patients receiving either infliximab or etanercept developed diffuse scaly erythematous reactions, histologically compatible with discoid lupus erythematosus.70-72 In their literature-based-analysis (1990-2006) of patients who developed autoimmune syndromes after the initiation anti-TNF treatment, Ramos-Casals et al73 identified 92 cases of LE in a total of 233 published cases of autoimmune diseases. Most of these cases (77 of 92) were treated for RA, while the remainder received therapy for other autoimmune arthritides or Crohn’s disease. Only 51% of cases fulfilled more than 4 criteria of the American College of Rheumatology classification for SLE and, after a more careful analysis, only 35% of the reviewed patients could be considered as having new onset of lupus, whereas the remaining patients had several preexisting features of lupus and may have represented an overlapping syndrome between RA and SLE. Cutaneous manifestations were described in 67% of cases. Drug-induced lupus usually recedes within a few weeks after the discontinuation of an anti-TNF agent, demonstrating the reversibility of this syndrome in the majority of cases. Adjuvant medication is needed only for some cases and usually consists of topical or systemic corticosteroids as well as anti-malarial and immunosuppressive agents. Vasculitis There are several reports of leukocytoclastic vasculitis (LCV) associated with the use of anti-TNF drugs.16,71,72,74-79 The Adverse Events Reporting System of the US Food and Drug Administration documented 35 patients with LCV, out of 116,000 and 344,000 individuals treated with etanercept and infliximab, respectively.75 The majority of these
cases were treated for RA. The diagnosis of LCV was histologically confirmed in 17 patients, showing typical histopathologic features of this entity. In 15 patients, the initial lesions appeared on the lower extremities and in 3 of them, receiving etanercept, the lesions appeared at the injection site. Clinically the lesions included bullae, petechiae, nodules, and urticarial wheals. Aside from the cutaneous manifestations, several patients had systemic manifestations, for example, arthralgias, fever, fatigue, myalgias, pedal edema, peripheral neuropathy, abdominal pain, pleuritic pain, pericardial effusion, and hematuria.75 Cessation of anti-TNF therapy resulted in marked improvement in 22 patients, whereas in 4 patients the lesions persisted despite drug discontinuation. Interestingly, LCV recurred in 5 patients taking etanercept after readministration of the same anti-TNF agent and in one patient who switched from infliximab to etanercept.75 Despite the possible coexistence of vasculitis in patients with autoimmune disorders, such as RA,80 the close temporal association of LCV with the initiation of anti-TNF therapy, the appearance of vasculitic lesions at the injection sites of etanercept, and the resolution of vasculitis in most of the patients after treatment discontinuation (and reappearance upon re-treatment) support a direct relation between LCV and anti-TNF therapy. In their prospective study of 289 RA patients, Flendrie et al38 reported 5 cases of LCV developing during treatment with anti-TNF agents. The diagnosis was confirmed by a skin biopsy in 4 cases. Only one of these cases (a necrotizing LCV with ulceration) was considered to be probably related to the administration of infliximab, while the remaining cases were considered as possibly or unlikely related, as they did not have a positive relation with the time of initiation of anti-TNF therapy and their resolution was independent of the cessation of the TNF-blocking agent. In their case series, Ramos-Casals et al73 identified 113 cases of vasculitis in patients who had received anti-TNF between 1990 and 2006. The majority of the patients (84%) were treated for RA. The main histologic finding was leukocytoclastic vasculitis (63% of cases). One fourth of the patients with cutaneous vasculitis also experienced extracutaneous manifestations, especially peripheral neuropathy and renal vasculitis. Autoantibodies were detected in a remarkable number of cases (ANAs in 27 cases, antineutrophilic cytoplasmatic antibodies in 10, cryoglobulins in 5, anti-DNA in 4, anti-phospholipid antibodies in 3, and anti-Ro/La antibodies in 1 patient). Drug discontinuation was the first step taken in the management of most
J AM ACAD DERMATOL
Moustou et al 495
VOLUME 61, NUMBER 3
patients (89%), with some requiring additional therapy, such as systemic corticosteroids (25%) and immunosuppressive agents (15%). Other cutaneous manifestations with vascular pathology have been described in the context of anti-TNF treatment, such as necrotizing vasculitis, LCV, HenochScho¨nlein purpura, vasculitis accompanied by cryoglobulinemia, purpura of Doukas-Kapetanakis, urticarial vasculitis, and perniosis.71,72,76,81,82 Lichenoid reactions Anti-TNF agents have been implicated in several cases of erythema multiforme and lichenoid drug eruptions, clinically manifested by papular erythematous lesions and histologically consistent with an interface dermatitis pattern.76,83,84 The reported cases were treated for RA and ankylosing spondylitis. Histopathologic features revealed a diffuse lymphocytic infiltrate in the superficial dermis with a liquefactive degeneration of the basal cell layer and foci of epidermal necrosis, a pattern implying an immunemediated cytotoxic mechanism. The triggering factors initiating this kind of reaction are not clearly understood, but the fact that all 3 anti-TNF drugs have been involved in the development of lichenoid reactions suggests an immunologic effect due to TNF inhibition rather than a direct antigenic stimulation by these agents. Granulomatous reactions Noninfectious cutaneous granulomatous reactions, including cutaneous sarcoidosis, interstitial granulomatous dermatitis, and disseminated granuloma annulare, have been documented in a total of 20 patients during anti-TNF therapy. Paradoxically, TNF-blocking therapy has been used as an off-label treatment of refractory sarcoidosis with contradictory results.85 Infliximab and adalimumab have been found to be efficacious in the majority of cases; however, 11 of 16 patients with progressive pulmonary sarcoidosis treated with etanercept had worsening of the disease.86-88 There are two other reports describing the development of cutaneous and pulmonary sarcoidosis as a consequence of etanercept treatment for ankylosing spondylitis and RA, respectively. Skin lesions consisted of red-brown nodules, positive on diascopy, and skin biopsy revealed noncaseating granulomas extending through the dermis. Discontinuation of etanercept in one case and systemic corticosteroid administration in the second case led to complete resolution.89,90 Interstitial granulomatous dermatitis (IGD, also known as atypical granuloma annulare, and palisaded neutrophilic and granulomatous dermatitis) has been associated with the use of infliximab,
etanercept, and adalimumab in patients with RA or psoriatic arthritis. Skin lesions had a rapid onset and presented as asymptomatic annular macules or indurated papules or plaques, some with a clear center and a slightly elevated border. The trunk, shoulders, and upper extremities were affected. Skin biopsy revealed diffuse interstitial granulomatous infiltrates of lymphocytes, histiocytes, and eosinophils palisading around degenerated collagen. Withdrawal of the anti-TNF agent led to complete resolution of the skin lesions.91,92 It is likely that IGD represents a reactive phenomenon with a spectrum of histopathologic features and possible associations with numerous disorders, including autoimmune diseases (RA), lymphoproliferative disorders, and drug reactions.92 The close temporal relation, however, between IGD development and anti-TNF administration, as well as the resolution of the dermatosis upon drug discontinuation, support an inducing or triggering role of anti-TNF therapy in the development of IGD. On the other hand, infliximab has been successfully used in one patient with IGD, although spontaneous regression of IGD could not be excluded in this case.93 In addition, 9 cases of disseminated granulomas annulare (2 with infliximab, 6 with adalimumab, 1 with etanercept) have been documented during anti-TNF therapy in 197 RA patients. The lesions were successfully treated with topical corticosteroids, and treatment discontinuation was necessary in only two patients.94 Cutaneous infections It is uncertain to what extent treatment with antiTNF agents for RA is associated with increased risk of serious infections, given the fact that the incidence rate of infections in the RA population is nearly twice as high as in matched non-RA controls.95 Studies in patients with RA have been inconsistent, with some showing an elevated risk of infection with anti-TNF agents and others failing to demonstrate any association.55,96-101 As highlighted in recent meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials of anti-TNF agents in RA and psoriasis, comparative data on cutaneous infections are lacking in most publications.102-104 In a retrospective study of 709 patients treated with a TNF-blocker for RA, spondyloarthropathy, or other inflammatory disorder, skin infections comprised 21% of all diagnosed infections, which were caused by bacteria in 53%, viruses in 30.5%, and fungi in 6.5% of cases. In cases with serious infections, the most frequent sites of involvement were skin and skin-associated tissues (40.4%). The two reported cases of mycobacterial infections
496 Moustou et al
J AM ACAD DERMATOL SEPTEMBER 2009
occurred with infliximab therapy, one of which was a cutaneous non-tuberculosis mycobacterial infection. Regarding infection site patterns of the 3 TNF-blockers, skin localization was more frequent for infliximab (11.6% of infliximab treatment courses) and adalimumab (6.6% of adalimumab treatment courses).99 In a study of 150 patients with rheumatic diseases receiving anti-TNF-alfa therapy, 35 patients experienced cutaneous side effects, among whom 13 patients were diagnosed with an infectious skin disease, mainly of fungal and bacterial etiology. Those patients included 3 cases of pityriasis versicolor, 3 cases of tinea corporis, 1 case of herpes simplex reactivation, 5 cases of microbial eczema, and 1 case of an acute cutaneous staphylococcal infection. These infections were mild and easily controlled by appropriate treatment.45 Moreover, a patient treated with infliximab for RA developed a fatal necrotizing fasciitis by b-hemolytic group A streptococcus isolated from blood cultures and skin swabs.105 An invasive Trichophyton rubrum infection occurred in a patient treated with infliximab and oral prednisone, which highlights the need of a thorough cutaneous examination of the patient for signs of dermatophytosis before TNF-alfa inhibitors are initiated.106 A prospective observational study of 7664 anti-TNF-treated patients versus 1354 patients with RA treated with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) showed a 4-fold increased risk of serious skin and soft tissue infections in the anti-TNF-treated group. There was no difference in infection risk among the 3 main anti-TNF drugs.100 It is interesting that antiTNF therapy was not associated with an increased risk of overall serious infections compared with DMARD treatment. The authors suggested that TNF may act differentially at different anatomic sites. Similarly, in a prospective controlled nonrandomized study of the frequency of infections in approximately 900 patients with RA who received TNF inhibitors (infliximab or etanercept) versus 601 patients who received DMARDs, a significantly increased risk of skin and subcutaneous tissue infections in patients receiving TNF inhibitors was observed. The total rate of bacterial skin infections was significantly higher in the TNF group, including erysipelas, furuncles, abscesses, and paronychia. In addition, there were 3 fungal skin infections, 10 mild to moderate herpes simplex skin infections, and 10 herpes zoster skin infections in the anti-TNF-treated group.107 In addition, cases of serious cellulitis have been reported in randomized controlled trials of infliximab and etanercept and a case of varicella zoster virus infection was reported with infliximab.108-110
Atypical mycobacterial infections of the skin have also been reported, including two cases of cutaneous Mycobacterium marinum infection that developed during infliximab treatment for ankylosing spondylitis and Crohn’s disease, respectively. Interestingly, the first case was receiving isoniazid for latent tuberculosis, which is ineffective in preventing M marinum infection. The patient was successfully treated with rifampicin and ethambutol for 8 months, while continuing on infliximab therapy.111,112 There are few data concerning cutaneous infections in psoriatic patients treated with anti-TNF therapy. Similar rates of infections have been reported in patients with psoriasis treated with infliximab versus placebo.113 Clinical studies of infliximab and etanercept in psoriatic patients reported mild cutaneous infections, including lower leg and breast cellulitis, furuncles, and cutaneous abscesses.114,115 In addition, a cutaneous Cryptococcus albidus infection has been reported in a 14-year-old boy after 8 months of etanercept therapy for psoriasis. The infection presented as an inflamed, tender lesion on his scalp with drainage of purulent material, and no systemic symptoms. A fungal culture was negative, but a deep culture revealed an infection by the yeast C albidus, which resolved after etanercept discontinuation and oral fluconazole administration.116 Case reports of human papillomavirus recurrence and molluscum contagosium appearance have also been described with infliximab treatment in psoriatic patients.117 Cutaneous lymphomas An increased incidence of lymphomas in patients with autoimmune disorders, such as RA, subjected to anti-TNF agents has been shown in some studies, while other studies have failed to provide supportive evidence of such an association.118-121 Patients with psoriasis or RA both carry an increased risk of lymphomas, in comparison with the general population, and the increased frequency of lymphomas that has been reported in patients with RA treated with anti-TNF agents may reflect the severity of the disease which could be associated with greater TNF-alfa activity.122-124 Chronic inflammation, leading to an altered state of immune regulation, and previous immunosuppressive therapies (e.g., azathioprine, cyclophosphamide, methotrexate) are known to increase the risk of lymphoproliferative disorders, especially non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma.120 Therefore, it is very difficult to assess the actual contribution of anti-TNF therapy to the potential causality of lymphomas in these patients. There are few reports on the possible association of TNF-blocking agents with primary cutaneous
J AM ACAD DERMATOL
Moustou et al 497
VOLUME 61, NUMBER 3
lymphomas. Since no cutaneous B-cell lymphomas have been described, all reported cases consisted of cutaneous T-cell lymphomas. Mahe et al125 described a case of CD301 T-cell lymphoma presenting after treatment of erythrodermic psoriasis with a combination of cyclosporine and 3 infusions of infliximab. Adams et al126 reported one case of CTCL that developed in a patient who had been treated for 18 months with etanercept for psoriatic arthritis, as well as a case of systemic anaplastic largecell lymphoma with cutaneous involvement that developed after 3 doses of infliximab and concomitant treatment with 6-mercaptopurine for a presumptive diagnosis of early Crohn disease. Both cases were characterized by rapid onset, extensive cutaneous and systemic involvement, and a fulminant clinical course which led to death within months of diagnosis. In addition, there was one case of atypical CD81 CTCL presenting after treatment with infliximab,127 and a patient with a lymphomatoid papulosiselike eruption that developed after 2 months of adalimumab therapy and disappeared within 6 weeks after adalimumab withdrawal (interestingly, the patient subsequently developed a large-cell anaplastic non-Hodgkin lymphoma).38 Other reports include one case of mycosis fungoides in a patient during the second year of infliximab therapy for ankylosing spondylitis,128 one case of Se´zary syndrome occurring 17 months after the onset of infliximab therapy for ankylosing spondylitis,129 and one case of mycosis fungoideseassociated follicular mucinosis following a 7-month treatment with adalimumab for ankylosing spondylitis. There was improvement with discontinuation of adalimumab, and treatment with retinoids and PUVA therapy.130 Non-melanoma skin cancers Non-melanoma skin cancers (basal cell and squamous cell carcinomas) and precancerous skin lesions such as actinic keratoses and Bowen’s disease have been noted in RA patients receiving anti-TNF therapy.38 In addition, rapid development of multiple keratoacanthomas and squamous cell carcinomas have been described in patients with RA and psoriasis following the initiation of either etanercept or infliximab.131-133 Nevertheless, the relationship between the administration of anti-TNF agents and cutaneous carcinogenesis remains an issue of debate. In an open-label study of Klareskog et al,134 comprising 549 patients with RA receiving etanercept, no increased risk of skin cancer was documented within an extended 5-year follow-up period. Other studies based on retrospective analysis of clinical trials of etanercept and post marketing
surveillance databases have supported these findings, showing a comparable incidence of SCC in etanercept-treated patients and in the general population.135 Moreover, experimental studies in animal models showed that the inhibition of TNF does not promote skin carcinogenesis, but, instead, may impede tumorigenesis and have a protective action.124,136,137 In a large US cohort of 15,789 patients with RA, compared with 3639 patients with osteoarthritis, a small but significant increased hazard (hazard ratio [HR],1.19) of developing NMSC was noted in RA patients compared with those with osteoarthritis, suggesting that the underlying disease itself and the degree of associated inflammation may predispose to skin cancer.138 When examining possible associations between immunosuppressive agents and NMSC in their RA cohort, the authors observed an increased risk of NMSC with prednisone use (HR, 1.28) and a similar trend with TNF inhibitors (HR, 1.24), particularly when combined with methotrexate (HR, 1.97). It remains, however, unclear whether this increased risk of NMSC is a function of immunosuppression or relates to the increased inflammatory activity of the underlying disease. It is obvious that, in this context, a clear causal association between anti-TNF therapy and the development of NMSC cannot be established. Furthermore, most previous findings have been reported on patients with RA, and caution should be taken when extrapolating these results to the population with psoriasis. It is well known that patients with psoriasis have a higher risk of skin cancer, largely because of previous carcinogenic treatments and their cumulative toxicities. In a randomized placebo-controlled trial of infliximab in psoriasis, 10 NMSCs (1 squamous cell carcinoma and 9 basal cell carcinomas) were reported, all in the infliximab groups.22 A previous exposure to phototherapy was reported in all affected patients. In another randomized trial using etanercept in plaque-type psoriasis, 14 NMSCs were observed in 10 patients, half of whom had been previously exposed to UVB or PUVA. However, the incidence of NMSC was not statistically significant compared to the expected incidence in the psoriatic population.139 Until further analysis of long-term data from clinical trials and post-marketing surveillance is available, skin cancer screening at regular intervals has been suggested for patients with psoriasis receiving anti-TNF therapy, particularly those with severe actinic damage, a history of multiple ([2) skin cancers, especially SCCs, and a record of high cumulative doses of PUVA therapy, given the previous example of enhanced PUVA-induced skin carcinogenesis by cyclosporine.140
498 Moustou et al
J AM ACAD DERMATOL SEPTEMBER 2009
Melanoma The development or recurrence of melanoma is a potential concern in patients undergoing immunosuppressive therapy, particularly in the post-transplantation setting.141,142 Fulchiero et al143 reported two cases of late recurrence of eruptive locoregional recurrences occurring 6 and 9 years after surgical excision of a stage IB and IA melanoma, respectively. Each case occurred within 90 days after initiation of etanercept and adalimumab, respectively, suggesting that the inhibition of active immune surveillance by TNF inhibitors may augment malignant cell proliferation in previously treated melanomas. Despite the margin of safety related to a distant history of melanoma, disease reactivation or recurrence with anti-TNF therapy remains a possibility in patients with a previous diagnosis of melanoma. In addition, Gordon et al35 reported the development of melanoma (Breslow thickness, 0.51 mm) 25 weeks after the initiation of adalimumab treatment in a psoriatic patient with a history of PUVA exposure. Interestingly, a recent report by Bovenschen et al144 described the occurrence of eruptive nevomelanocytic nevi on the palms and soles of two patients with Crohn’s disease, treated with a combination of azathioprine and infliximab. In a third case, a patient with plaque-type psoriasis developed eruptive nevi during two episodes of treatment with alefacept and etanercept, respectively. Although more commonly seen in posttransplant patients under immunosuppressive regimens,145 the development of eruptive nevi arising in the context of biologic therapy for psoriasis is possible.
DISCUSSION The advent of new anti-TNF agents has revolutionized our therapeutic approach to chronic inflammatory diseases. As these agents become widely used in clinical practice, cutaneous adverse events are being increasingly recorded, including infusion and injection site reactions, psoriasis and psoriasiform eruptions, autoimmune skin disorders, vasculitis, granulomatous reactions, and cutaneous infections. Several limitations make it difficult to assess the direct contribution of anti-TNF therapy to the potential causality of reported skin conditions. Although there are many randomized controlled studies in the literature focusing on the efficacy and safety of infliximab, etanercept, and adalimumab, only a few provide details concerning the observed cutaneous adverse events. Moreover, most data relate to patients with rheumatologic conditions that may have different characteristics from patients with psoriasis, such as baseline risk of immune reactions, lymphomas or infections, reaction to treatment, or previous
immunosuppressive treatments. Retrospective studies include patients that are not always homogeneous with regard to the underlying disease, the dosage regimen used, or the treatment duration. In addition, data on cutaneous lymphomas, epithelial skin cancers, and melanoma mainly derive from isolated case reports which could detect events related to the disease or to previous carcinogenic or immunosuppressive treatments rather than the anti-TNF agent per se. Therefore, there is a strong need for continuous vigilance, long-term surveillance, and systematic reporting of any suspected association of cutaneous events with TNF-blocking therapies in order to document a causal relationship. In addition to reviewing the reported cutaneous adverse events, we attempted a critical consideration of the strength of association between a given event and the use of an anti-TNF agent. Several criteria were used, based on the type of study reporting the specific event, the number of anti-TNF agents involved, the type of inflammatory diseases in which the reaction had occurred, and the outcome upon withdrawal of or re-challenge with anti-TNF therapy. With the exception of infusion and injection site reactions that were definitely associated with the use of infliximab and adalimumab and etanercept respectively, the strongest associations ( $ 3 criteria) were suggested for psoriasis and psoriasiform-like lesions, lupus-like syndromes, cutaneous vasculitis, and cutaneous infections. A moderate association ( $ 2 criteria) was apparent between anti-TNF treatment and eczematous reactions, lichenoid disorders, and granulomatous reactions, although additional data are necessary to confirm this relationship. Furthermore, the scarce data on cutaneous lymphomas, epithelial skin cancers, and melanoma, do not support a clinically meaningful link between antiTNF treatment and skin cancer. Our classification of events based on the strength of association does not conform to the stringent criteria and statistical workup of a meta-analytical study. However, it does provide a useful evidence-based approach that will aid the practicing dermatologist in defining the probabilities of association of a given cutaneous reaction with anti-TNF therapy. It is also important to emphasize that our investigation was based on current literature and that the reported associations may change in the future, as more evidence and experience are accumulated with the use of anti-TNF agents in clinical practice. Given the regulatory role of TNF in various immunologic functions, several authors have proposed potential pathophysiologic mechanisms in an effort to interpret the development of cutaneous adverse reactions. For most reactions, however, the
J AM ACAD DERMATOL
Moustou et al 499
VOLUME 61, NUMBER 3
underlying pathophysiology remains largely speculative. Therapeutic TNF blockade has been shown to have differential effects, alleviating, for instance, lupus nephritis in some patients, but inducing typical SLE in others.146 A similar phenomenon can be hypothesized for psoriasis; despite their known anti-psoriatic efficacy, anti-TNF agents may induce psoriasiform lesions in a subset of cases. Given the considerable overlap among the seronegative spondyloarthropathies, it is possible that some of the patients developing psoriasiform lesions under antiTNF treatment have indeed psoriatic arthritis and are, therefore, expected to develop clinically overt psoriasis during the course of their arthritic disease.147 However, the fact that psoriasiform skin lesions occur even in cases with typical clinical and serologic evidence of RA, as well as the frequently observed pattern of pustular palmoplantar manifestation, points to a specific class effect of anti-TNF agents. Patients with RA treated with infliximab or etanercept have an increased number of peripheral T cells expressing chemokine receptor CXCR3, which promotes infiltration of autoreactive T cells to the skin. An increase of interferon gamma levels by anti-TNF agents may also play a role in the stimulation of CXCR3 chemokine receptor on activated T cells.148,149 In addition, Langerhans cells, found in low densities in psoriatic lesions, have been demonstrated to increase after initiation of adalimumab. This effect could activate T cells and promote an inflammatory skin reaction manifesting as psoriasiform lesions in a selective subgroup of patients.150 The mechanism underlying anti-TNF-related lupuslike syndromes remain elusive. TNF is known to be involved in normal inflammatory responses, regulating the function of antigen-presenting cells and the apoptosis of autoreactive T cells, to prevent autoimmunity reactions.151 On the other hand, the neutralization of TNF has been shown to promote humoral autoimmunity, by inhibiting a cytotoxic T-lymphocyte response that would normally suppress autoreactive B cells.152 It is noteworthy that despite the high incidence of autoantibodies, the clinical development of lupus is rare. The fact that an increase in the IgG isotype of anti-dsDNA, rather than the IgM isotype, has been implicated in the pathogenesis of lupus, and that the reverse is observed in patients with TNF-related lupus, might offer an explanation.59,63,64,153,154 The pathogenesis of LCV in anti-TNF-treated cases remains unknown, although antibodies against infliximab or etanercept have been described as a consequence of anti-TNF therapy and may play a role in developing an immune complexemediated hypersensitivity vasculitis or a direct antigenemediated hypersensitivity
reaction in cases of vasculitis at etanercept-injected sites.15,25 The occurrence of granulomatous reactions while receiving anti-TNF agents, particularly etanercept, appears paradoxical, taking into account the pivotal role of TNF-alfa in the pathogenesis of sarcoidosis and granuloma formation.155,156 A possible explanation lies in the differences of the mechanism of action between etanercept and infliximab; while infliximab is effective in the treatment of chronic granulomatous diseases such as CD and Wegener’s granulomatosis, etanercept is not.157 Etanercept does not cause lysis of CD41 T cells expressing membrane-bound TNF-alfa, and it allows redistribution of bioactive TNF-alfa from sites of production, such as the inflamed joints, into other tissues where overall TNF-alfa concentrations are low.86 Occasionally higher levels of biologically active TNF can occur with etanercept therapy, which may allow the formation of granulomas.158 Finally, the reported erythema multiformeelike drug reactions described with TNF-alfa blockers is intriguing, given the suggestive role of anti-TNF agents for the treatment of toxic epidermal necrolysis and acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis caused by drugs.159-161 Once again, we encounter the same dual action of anti-TNF agents exhibiting a therapeutic effect in some patients, while inducing the same pathology in others. It has been hypothesized that the underlying inflammatory disease could constitute an appropriate setting in which immune complexes between TNF-alfa and its antagonists propagate a cytotoxic immune reaction in the skin leading to the development of lichenoid or erythema multiformeelike lesions. In conclusion, anti-TNF agents constitute an established therapeutic option for inflammatory disorders with documented efficacy and a safety profile that is continuously being monitored and investigated.22,104,162-164 Among the associated adverse events, a wide spectrum of cutaneous eruptions has been reported. Some cutaneous reactions are clearly attributed to the administration of anti-TNF agents (ie, infusion reactions and injection site reactions), but in other cases the link is less obvious regarding underlying mechanisms, temporal association with treatment, and outcome upon withdrawal of anti-TNF agents. It is worthwhile mentioning that the majority of all previously described adverse events are of mild or moderate severity, usually resolving with short-term topical or systemic therapy and not always leading to drug discontinuation. For example, mild infusion reactions can be managed without discontinuing anti-TNF therapy, and the majority of psoriasiform and other papulosquamous eruptions are treated with topical therapy, whereas
500 Moustou et al
J AM ACAD DERMATOL SEPTEMBER 2009
most cutaneous infections resolve with antibiotic therapy. Although neoplastic conditions, including cutaneous lymphomas and NMSCs cannot be directly attributed to the use of anti-TNF agents, the incidence of such events should be carefully monitored as both the number of patients on anti-TNF treatment and the duration of treatment are increasing as a result of improved clinical responses. As most of the information on cutaneous adverse events by anti-TNF agents derives from numerous case reports and case series, it is imperative that larger prospective studies be conducted to shed light on the prevalence of these reactions, to define their underlying mechanisms, and to provide guidelines for their prevention and management. REFERENCES 1. Beulter B, Cerami A. The biology of cachectin/TNF—a primary mediator of the host response. Annu Rev Immunol 1989;7: 625-55. 2. Aggarwal BB, Moffat B, Harkins RN. Human lymphotoxin. Production by a lymphoblastoid cell line, purification, and initial characterization. J Biol Chem 1984;259:686-91. 3. Vassalli P. The pathophysiology of tumor necrosis factors. Annu Rev Immunol 1992;10:411-53. 4. Murray KM, Dahl SL. Recombinant human tumor necrosis factor receptor (p75) Fc fusion protein (TNFR:Fc) in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Pharmacother 1997;31:1335-8. 5. Knight DM, Trinh H, Le J, Siegel S, Shealy D, McDonough M, et al. Construction and initial characterization of a mouse-human chimeric anti-TNF antibody. Mol Immunol 1993;30:1443-53. 6. Kempeni J. Preliminary results of early clinical trials with the fully human anti-TNFalpha monoclonal antibody D2E7. Ann Rheum Dis 1999;58(Suppl. 1):I70-2. 7. Scallon BJ, Moore MA, Trinh H, Knight DM, Ghrayeb J. Chimeric anti-TNF monoclonal antibody cA2 binds recombinant transmembrane TNF-alpha and activates immune effector functions. Cytokine 1995;7:251-9. 8. Hanauer SB. Safety of infliximab in clinical trials. Pharmacol Ther 1999;13(suppl 4):16-21. 9. Harriman G, Harper LK, Schaible JD. Summary of clinical trials in rheumatoid arthritis using infliximab, an anti-TNF-alpha treatment. Ann Rheum Dis 1999;58:161-4. 10. Klareskog L, Moreland L, Cohen S, Sanda M, Burge D. Global safety and efficacy of up to five years of etanercept (Enbrel) therapy in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2001;44:S77. 11. Colombel JF, Loftus EV Jr, Tremaine WJ, Egan LJ, Harmsen WS, Schleck CD, et al. The safety profile of infliximab in patients with Crohn’s disease: the Mayo Clinic experience in 500 patients. Gastroenterology 2004;126:19-31. 12. Tutrone WD, Saini R, Weinberg JM. Biological therapy for psoriasis: an overview of infliximab, etanercept and alefacept. IDrugs 2004;7:45-9. 13. Isaacs JD. The antiglobulin response to therapeutic antibodies. Semin Immunol 1990;2:449-56. 14. Cheifetz A, Mayer L. Monoclonal antibodies, immunogenicity, and associated infusion reactions. Mt Sinai J Med 2005;72:250-6. 15. Baert F, Noman M, Vermeire S, Van Assche G, D’Haens G, Carbonez A, et al. Influence of immunogenicity on the long term efficacy of infliximab in Crohn’s disease. N Engl J Med 2003;348:601-8.
16. Thielen AM, Kuenzli S, Saurat JH. Cutaneous adverse events of biological therapy for psoriasis: review of the literature. Dermatology 2005;211:209-17. 17. Persley KM. Infliximab infusion reactions: desensitizing ourselves to the danger. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2004;10:62-3. 18. Cheifetz A, Smedley M, Martin S, Reiter M, Leone G, Mayer L, et al. The incidence and management of infusion reactions to infliximab: a large center experience. Am J Gastroenterol 2003;98:1315-24. 19. Lequerre´ T, Vittecoq O, Klemmer N, Goe¨b V, Pouplin S, Menard JF, et al. Management of infusion reactions to infliximab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis or spondyloarthritis: experience from an immunotherapy unit of rheumatology. J Rheumatol 2006;33:1307-14. 20. Han PD, Cohen RD. Managing immunogenic responses to infliximab: treatment implications for patients with Crohn’s disease. Drugs 2004;64:1767-77. 21. Wolbink GJ, Vis M, Lems W, Voskuyl AE, de Groot E, Nurmohamed MT, et al. Development of antiinfliximab antibodies and relationship to clinical response in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2006;54:711-5. 22. Menter A, Feldman SR, Weinstein GD, Papp K, Evans R, Guzzo C, et al. A randomized comparison of continuous vs. intermittent infliximab maintenance regimens over 1 year in the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. J Am Acad Dermatol 2007;56:31.e1-15. 23. Lobel EZ, Korelitz BI, Warman JI. Red man syndrome and infliximab. J Clin Gastroenterol 2003;36:186. 24. Augustsson J, Eksborg S, Ernestam S, Gullstro¨m E, van Vollenhoven R. Low-dose glucocorticoid therapy decreases risk for treatment-limiting infusion reaction to infliximab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2007;66: 1462-6. 25. Werth VP, Levinson AI. Etanercept-induced injection site reactions: mechanistic insights from clinical findings and immunochemistry. Arch Dermatol 2001;137:953-5. 26. Youdim A, Vasiliauskas EA, Targan SR, Papadakis KA, Ippoliti A, Dubinsky MC, et al. A pilot study of adalimumab in infliximab-allergic patients. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2004;10:333-8. 27. Sandborn WJ, Hanauer S, Loftus EV Jr, Tremaine WJ, Kane S, Cohen R, et al. An open-label study of the human anti-TNF monoclonal antibody adalimumab in subjects with prior loss of response or intolerance to infliximab for Crohn’s disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2004;99:1984-9. 28. Sandborn WJ, Rutgeerts P, Enns R, Hanauer SB, Colombel JF, Panaccione R, et al. Adalimumab induction therapy for Crohn disease previously treated with infliximab: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2007;146:829-38. 29. Baidoo L, Lichtenstein GR. What next after infliximab? Am J Gastroenterol 2005;100:80-3. 30. Zeltser R, Valle L, Tanck C, Holyst MM, Ritchlin C, Gaspari AA. Clinical, histological and immunophenotypic characteristics of injection site reactions associated with etanercept: a recombinant tumor necrosis factor alpha receptor: Fc fusion protein. Arch Dermatol 2001;137:893-9. 31. Leonardi CL, Powers JL, Matheson RT, Goffe BS, Zitnik R, Wang A, et al. Etanercept as monotherapy in patients with psoriasis. N Engl J Med 2003;349:2014-22. 32. Papp KA, Tyring S, Lahfa M, Prinz J, Griffiths CE, Nakanishi AM, et al. A global phase III randomized controlled trial of etanercept in psoriasis: safety, efficacy, and effect of dose reduction. Br J Dermatol 2005;152:1304-12. 33. Gonzalez-Lopez MA, Martinez-Taboada VM, Gonzalez-Vela MC, Blanco R, Fernandez-Llaca H, Rodriguez-Valverde V. Recall injection-site reactions associated with etanercept
J AM ACAD DERMATOL
Moustou et al 501
VOLUME 61, NUMBER 3
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
43.
44.
45.
46.
47.
48.
49.
therapy: report of two new cases with immunohistochemical analysis. Clin Exp Dermatol 2007;32:672-4. van de Putte LB, Atkins C, Malaise M, Sany J, Russell AS, van Riel PL, et al. Efficacy and safety of adalimumab as monotherapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis for whom previous disease modifying antirheumatic drug treatment has failed. Ann Rheum Dis 2004;63:508-16. Gordon KB, Langley RG, Leonardi C, Toth D, Menter MA, Kang S, et al. Clinical response to adalimumab treatment in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis: double-blind, randomized controlled trial and open-label extension study. J Am Acad Dermatol 2006;55:598-606. Sfikakis PP, Iliopoulos A, Elezoglou A, Kittas C, Stratigos A. Psoriasis induced by anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy: a paradoxical adverse reaction. Arthritis Rheum 2005;52:2513-8. Thurber M, Feasel A, Stroehlein J, Hymes SR. Pustular psoriasis induced by infliximab. J Drugs Dermatol 2004;3: 439-40. Flendrie M, Vissers WH, Creemers MC, de Jong EM, van de Kerkhof PC, van Riel PL. Dermatological conditions during TNF-alpha-blocking therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a prospective study. Arthritis Res Ther 2005;7: R666-76. Pirard D, Arco D, Debrouckere V, Heenen M. Anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha induced psoriasiform eruptions: three further cases and current overview. Dermatology 2006;231: 182-6. Aslanidis S, Pyrpasopoulou A, Leontsini M, Zanboulis C. AntiTNF-alpha-induced psoriasis: case report of an unusual adverse event. Int J Dermatol 2006;45:982-3. Passarini B, Infusino SD, Barbieri E, Varotti E, Gionchetti P, Rizzello F, et al. Cutaneous manifestations in inflammatory bowel diseases: eight cases of psoriasis induced by antitumor-necrosis-factor antibody therapy. Dermatology 2007; 215:295-300. Takahashi H, Hashimoto Y, Ishida-Yamamoto A, Ashida T, Kohgo Y, Iizuka H. Psoriasiform and pustular eruption induced by infliximab. J Dermatol 2007;34:468-72. Wollina U, Hansel G, Koch A, Scho¨nlebe J, Ko¨stler E, Haroske G. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitor-induced psoriasis or psoriasiform exanthemata: first 120 cases from the literature including a series of six new patients. Am J Clin Dermatol 2008;9:1-14. Severs GA, Lawlor TH, Purcell SM, Adler DJ, Thompson R. Cutaneous adverse reaction to infliximab: report of psoriasis developing in 3 patients. Cutis 2007;80:231-7. Lee HH, Song IH, Friedrich M, Gauliard A, Detert J, Ro¨wert J, et al. Cutaneous side-effects in patients with rheumatic diseases during application of tumour necrosis factor-alpha antagonists. Br J Dermatol 2007;156:486-91. Harrison MJ, Dixon WG, Watson KD, King Y, Groves R, Hyrich KL, et al. Rates of new-onset psoriasis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving anti-TNF{alpha} therapy Results from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register. Ann Rheum Dis 2008 Apr 2. [Epub ahead of print]. Verea MM, Del Pozo J, Yebra-Pimentel MT, Porta A, Fonseca E. Psoriasiform eruption induced by infliximab. Ann Pharmacother 2004;38:54-7. Seneschal J, Lepreux S, Bouyssou-Gauthier ML, Heliot-Hosten I, Economou A, Dehais J, et al. Psoriasiform drug eruptions under anti-TNF treatment of arthritis are not true psoriasis. Acta Derm Venereol 2007;87:77-80. Seneschal J, Lepreux S, Milpied B, Schaeverbeke T, Taieb A. Psoriasiform eruptions during anti-TNF-a treatment: psoriasis or not? Arch Dermatol 2007;143:1593-5.
50. Thielen AM, Barde C, Janer V, Borradori L, Saurat JH. Reiter syndrome triggered by adalimumab (Humira) and leflunomide (Arava) in a patient with ankylosing spondylarthropathy and Crohn disease. Br J Dermatol 2007;156:163-201. 51. Wright RC. Atopic dermatitis-like eruption precipitated by infliximab. J Am Acad Dermatol 2003;49:160-1. 52. Chan JL, Davis-Reed L, Kimball AB. Counter-regulatory balance: atopic dermatitis in patients undergoing infliximab infusion therapy. J Drugs Dermatol 2004;3:315-8. 53. Vestergaard C, Deleuran M, Kragballe K. Two cases of atopic dermatitis-like conditions induced in psoriasis patients treated with infliximab. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2007;21: 1272-4. 54. Mangge H, Gindl S, Kenzian H, Schauenstein K. Atopic dermatitis as a side effect of anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha therapy. J Rheumatol 2003;30:2506-7. 55. Lipsky PE, van der Heijde DM, St Clair EW, Furst DE, Breedveld FC, Kalden JR, et al. Infliximab and methotrexate in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: anti-tumor necrosis factor trial in rheumatoid arthritis with concomitant therapy study group. N Engl J Med 2000;343:1594-602. 56. Garrison L, McDonnell N. Etanercept: therapeutic use in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 1999; 58(Suppl 1):165-9. 57. Charles PJ, Smeenk RJ, De Jong J, Feldmann M, Maini RN. Assessment of antibodies to double-stranded DNA induced in rheumatoid arthritis patients, following treatment with infliximab, a monoclonal antibody to tumor necrosis factor alpha: findings in open-label and randomized placebo-controlled trials. Arthritis Rheum 2000;43:2383-90. 58. Eriksson C, Engstrand S, Sundqvist KG, Rantapaa-Dahlqvist S. Autoantibody formation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with anti-TNF alpha. Ann Rheum Dis 2005;64:403-7. 59. De Rycke L, Kruithof E, Van Damme N, Hoffman IE, Van den Bossche N, Van den Bosch F, et al. Antinuclear antibodies following infliximab treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis or spondylarthropathy. Arthritis Rheum 2003;48: 1015-23. 60. De Rycke L, Baeten D, Kruithof E, Van Den Bosch F, Veys EM, De Keyser F. Infliximab, but not etanercept, induces IgM antidouble-stranded DNA autoantibodies as main antinuclear reactivity: biologic and clinical implications in autoimmune arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2005;52:2192-201. 61. Atzeni F, Turiel M, Capsoni F, Doria A, Meroni P, Sarzi-Puttini P. Autoimmunity and anti-TNF-alpha agents. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2005;1051:559-69. 62. Gottlieb AB, Evans R, Li S, Dooley LT, Guzzo CA, Baker D, et al. Infliximab induction therapy for patients with severe plaquetype psoriasis: a randomized double blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Am Acad Dermatol 2004;51:534-42. 63. Poulalhon N, Begon E, Lebbe C, Liote F, Lahfa M, Bengoufa D, et al. A follow-up study in 28 patients treated with infliximab for severe recalcitrant psoriasis: evidence for efficacy and high incidence of biological autoimmunity. Br J Dermatol 2007;156:329-36. 64. Klapman JB, Ene-Stroescu D, Becker MA, Hanauer SB. A lupus-like syndrome associated with infliximab therapy. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2003;9:176-8. 65. Sarzi-Puttini P, Atzeni F, Capsoni F, Lubrano E, Doria A. Druginduced lupus erythematosus. Autoimmunity 2005;38:507-18. 66. Cairns AP, Duncan MK, Hinder AE, Taggart AJ. New onset systemic lupus erythematosus in a patient receiving etanercept for rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2002;61:1031-2. 67. Patel T, Gordon KB. Adalimumab: efficacy and safety in psoriasis and rheumatoid arthritis. Dermatol Ther 2004;17:427-31.
502 Moustou et al
J AM ACAD DERMATOL SEPTEMBER 2009
68. De Bandt M, Sibilia J, Le Loe¨t X, Prouzeau S, Fautrel B, Marcelli C, et al. Systemic lupus erythematosus induced by anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha therapy: a French national survey. Arthritis Res Ther 2005;7:R545-51. 69. Shakoor N, Michalska M, Harris CA, Block JA. Drug-induced systemic lupus erythematosus associated with etanercept therapy. Lancet 2002;359:579-80. 70. Stratigos AJ, Antoniou C, Stamathioudaki S, Avgerinou G, Tsega A, Katsambas AD. Discoid lupus erythematosus-like eruption induced by infliximab. Clin Exp Dermatol 2004;29: 150-3. 71. Brion PH, Mittal-Henkle A, Kalunian KC. Autoimmune skin rashes associated with etanercept for rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Intern Med 1999;131:634. 72. Misery L, Perrot JL, Gentil-Perret A, Pallot-Prades B, Cambazard F, Alexandre C. Dermatological complications of etanercept therapy for rheumatoid arthritis. Br J Dermatol 2002; 146:334-5. 73. Ramos-Casals M, Brito-Zeron P, Munoz S, Soria N, Galiana D, Bertolaccini L, et al. Autoimmune diseases induced by TNFtargeted therapies: analysis of 233 cases. Medicine (Baltimore) 2007;86(4):242-51. 74. Srivastava MD, Alexander F, Tuthill RJ. Immunology of cutaneous vasculitis associated with both etanercept and infliximab. Scand J Immunol 2005;61:329-36. 75. Mohan N, Edwards ET, Cupps TR, Slifman N, Lee JH, Siegel JN, et al. Leukocytoclastic vasculitis associated with tumor necrosis factor-alpha blocking agents. J Rheumatol 2004;31:1955-8. 76. Devos SA, Van Den Bossche N, De Vos M, Naeyaert JM. Adverse skin reactions to anti-TNF-alpha monoclonal antibody therapy. Dermatology 2003;206:388-90. 77. Kavanaugh A. Chimeric anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha monoclonal antibody treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving methotrexate therapy. J Rheumatol 2000; 27:841-50. 78. Lebas D, Staumont-Salle D, Solau-Gervais E, Flipo RM, Delaporte E. [Cutaneous manifestations during treatment with TNF-alpha blockers: 11 cases.] Ann Dermatol Venereol 2007;134:337-42. French. 79. McCain ME, Quinet RJ, Davis WE. Etanercept and infliximab associated with cutaneous vasculitis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2002;41:116-7. 80. Turesson C, O’Fallon WM, Crowson CS, Gabriel SE, Matteson EL. Occurrence of extraarticular disease manifestations is associated with excess mortality in a community-based cohort of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 2002;29:62-7. 81. Wang LC, Medenica MM, Shea CR, Busbey S. Infliximabinduced eczematid-like purpura of Doukas and Kapetanakis. J Am Acad Dermatol 2003;49:157-8. 82. Lee A, Kasama R, Evangelisto A, Elfendein B, Falasca G. Henoch-Schonlein purpura after etanercept therapy for psoriasis. J Clin Rheumatol 2006;12:249-51. 83. Vergara G, Silvestre JF, Betlloch I, Vella P, Albares MP, Pascual JC. Cutaneous drug eruption to infliximab: report of 4 cases with an interface dermatitis pattern. Arch Dermatol 2002;138: 1258-9. 84. Beuthien W, Mellinghoff H-U, von Kempis J. Skin reaction to adalimumab. Arthritis Rheum 2004;50:1690-2. 85. Graves JE, Nunley K, Heffernan MP. Off-label uses of biologics in dermatology: rituximab, omalizumab, infliximab, etanercept, adalimumab, efalizumab, and alefacept. J Am Acad Dermatol 2007;56:e55-79. 86. Badgwell C, Rosen T. Cutaneous sarcoidosis therapy updated. J Am Acad Dermatol 2007;56:69-83.
87. Callejas-Rubio JL, Ortego-Centeno N, Lopez-Perez L, Benticuaga MN. Treatment of therapy-resistant sarcoidosis with adalimumab. Clin Rheumatol 2006;25:596-7. 88. Utz JP, Limper AH, Kalra S, Specks U, Scott JP, Vuk-Pavlovic Z, et al. Etanercept for the treatment of stage II and III progressive pulmonary sarcoidosis. Chest 2003;124:177-85. 89. Gonza´lez-Lo´pez MA, Blanco R, Gonza´lez-Vela MC, Ferna´ndez-Llaca H, Rodrı´guez-Valverde V. Development of sarcoidosis during etanercept therapy. Arthritis Rheum 2006;55: 817-20. 90. Peno-Green L, Lluberas G, Kingsley T, Brantley S. Lung injury linked to etanercept therapy. Chest 2002;122:1858-60. 91. Bremner R, Simpson E, White CR, Morrison L, Deodhar A. Palisaded neutrophilic and granulomatous dermatitis: an unusual cutaneous manifestation of immune-mediated disorders. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2004;34:610-6. 92. Deng A, Harvey V, Sina B, Strobel D, Badros A, JunkinsHopkins JM, et al. Interstitial granulomatous dermatitis associated with the use of tumor necrosis factor a inhibitors. Arch Dermatol 2006;142:198-202. 93. Kreuter A, Gambichler T, Altmeyer P. Infliximab therapy for interstitial granulomatous dermatitis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2007;21:251-2. 94. Voulgari PV, Markatseli TE, Exarchou SA, Zioga A, Drosos AA. Granuloma annulare induced by anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy. Ann Rheum Dis 2008;67:567-70. 95. Doran MF, Crowson CS, Pond GR, O’Fallon WM, Gabriel SE. Frequency of infection in patients with rheumatoid arthritis compared with controls: a population-based study. Arthritis Rheum 2002;46:2287-93. 96. Bongartz T, Sutton AJ, Sweeting MJ, Buchan I, Matteson EL, Montori V. Anti-TNF antibody therapy in rheumatoid arthritis and the risk of serious infections and malignancies: systematic review and meta-analysis of rare harmful effects in randomized controlled trials. JAMA 2006;295:2275-85. 97. Curtis JR, Patkar N, Xie A, Martin C, Allison JJ, Saag M, et al. Risk of serious bacterial infections among rheumatoid arthritis patients exposed to tumor necrosis factor a antagonists. Arthritis Rheum 2007;56:1125-33. 98. St Clair WE, van der Heijde DM, Smolen JS, Maini RN, Bathon JM, Emery P, et al. Combination of infliximab and methotrexate therapy for early rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized, controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum 2004;50:3432-43. 99. Salliot C, Gossec L, Ruyssen-Witrand A, Luc M, Duclos M, Guignard S, et al. Infections during tumour necrosis factor-a blocker therapy for rheumatic diseases in daily practice: a systematic retrospective study of 709 patients. Rheumatology 2007;46:327-34. 100. Dixon WG, Watson K, Lunt M, Hyrich KL, Silman AJ, Symmons DP. Rates of serious infection, including site-specific and bacterial intracellular infection, in rheumatoid arthritis patients receiving anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy: results from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register. Arthritis Rheum 2006;54:2368-76. 101. Schneeweiss S, Setoguchi S, Weinblatt ME, Katz JN, Avorn J, Sax PE, et al. Anti-tumor necrosis factor a therapy and the risk of serious bacterial infections in elderly patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2007;56:1754-64. 102. Alonso-Ruiz A, Pijoan JI, Ansuategui E, Urkaregi A, Calabozo M, Quintana A. Tumor necrosis factor alpha drugs in rheumatoid arthritis: systematic review and metaanalysis of efficacy and safety. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2008;9:52. 103. Brimhall AK, King LN, Licciardone JC, Jacobe H, Menter A. Safety and efficacy of alefacept, efalizumab, etanercept and infliximab in treating moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: a
J AM ACAD DERMATOL
Moustou et al 503
VOLUME 61, NUMBER 3
104.
105.
106.
107.
108.
109.
110. 111.
112.
113.
114.
115. 116.
117.
118.
119.
120.
meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Br J Dermatol 2008;159:274-85. Gottlieb AB, Leonardi CL, Goffe BS, Ortonne JP, van der Kerkhof PC, Zitnik R, et al. Etanercept monotherapy in patients with psoriasis: a summary of safety, based on an integrated multistudy database. J Am Acad Dermatol 2006; 54:S92-100. Chan AT, Cleeve V, Daymond TJ. Necrotising fasciitis in a patient receiving infliximab for rheumatoid arthritis. Postgrad Med J 2002;78:47-8. Lowther AL, Somani AK, Camouse M, Florentino FT, Somach SC. Invasive Trichophyton rubrum infection occurring with infliximab and long-term prednisone treatment. J Cutan Med Surg 2007;11:84-8. Listing J, Strangfeld A, Kary S, Rau R, von Hinueber U, Stoyanova-Scholz M, et al. Infections in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with biologic agents. Arthritis Rheum 2005;52:3403-12. Maini RN, Breedveld FC, Kalden JR, Smolen JS, Furst D, Weisman MH, et al. Sustained improvement over two years in physical function, structural damage, and signs and symptoms among patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with infliximab and methotrexate. Arthritis Rheum 2004;50: 1051-65. Genovese MC, Barthon JM, Martin RW, Fleischmann RM, Tesser JR, Schiff MH, et al. Etanercept versus methotrexate in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: two-year radiographic and clinical outcomes. Arthritis Rheum 2002;46:1443-50. Baumgart DC, Dignass AU. Shingles following infliximab infusion. Ann Rheum Dis 2002;61:661. Rallis E, Koumantaki-Mathioudaki E, Frangoulis E, Chatziolou E, Katsambas A. Severe sporotrichoid fish tank granuloma following infliximab therapy. Am J Clin Dermatol 2007;8: 385-8. Fallon JC, Patchett S, Gulmann C, Murphy GM. Mycobacterium marinum infection complicating Crohn’s disease, treated with infliximab. Clin Exp Dermatol 2008;33:43-5. Reich K, Nestle FO, Papp K, Ortonne JP, Evans R, Guzzo C, et al. Infliximab induction and maintenance therapy for moderate-to-severe psoriasis: a phase III, multicentre, double-blind trial. Lancet 2005;366:1367-74. Smith CH, Jackson K, Bashir SJ. Infliximab for severe, treatment-resistant psoriasis: a prospective, open-label study. Br J Dermatol 2006;155:160-9. Ahmad K, Rogers S. Two years of experience with etanercept in recalcitrant psoriasis. Br J Dermatol 2007;156:1010-4. Hoang KJ, Burrus J. Localized cutaneous Cryptococcus albidus infection in a 14-year-old boy on etanercept therapy. Pediatr Dermatol 2007;24:285-8. Antoniou C, Kosmadaki MG, Stratigos AJ, Katsambas AD. Genital HPV lesions and molluscum contagiosum occurring in patients receiving anti-TNF-alpha therapy. Dermatology 2008;216:364-5. Geborek P, Bladstrom A, Turesson C, Gulfe A, Petersson IF, Saxne T, et al. Tumor necrosis factor blockers do not increase overall tumor risk in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, but may be associated with an increased risk of lymphomas. Ann Rheum Dis 2005;64:699-703. Wolfe F, Michaud K. Lymphoma in rheumatoid arthritis: the effect of methotrexate and anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy in 18,572 patients. Arthritis Rheum 2004;50:1703-6. Wolfe F, Michaud K. The effect of methotrexate and antitumor necrosis factor therapy on the risk of lymphoma in rheumatoid arthritis in 19,562 patients during 89,710 personyears of observation. Arthritis Rheum 2007;56:1433-9.
121. Askling J, Baecklund E, Granath F, Geborek P, Fored M, Backlin C, et al. Anti-TNF therapy in RA and risk of malignant lymphomas Relative risks and time-trends in the Swedish Biologics Register. Ann Rheum Dis 2008May 8. [Epub ahead of print] 122. Gridley G, McLaughlin JK, Ekbom A, Klareskog L, Adami HO, Hacker DG, et al. Incidence of cancer among patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Natl Cancer Inst 1993;85:307-11. 123. Hannuksela-Svahn A, Pukkala E, Laara E, Poikolainen K, Karvonen J. Psoriasis, its treatment, and cancer in a cohort of Finnish patients. J Invest Dermatol 2000;114:587-90. 124. Williams GM. Antitumor necrosis factor-alpha therapy and potential cancer inhibition. Eur J Cancer Prev 2008;17: 169-77. 125. Mahe´ E, Descamps V, Grossin M, Fraitag S, Crickx B. CD301 Tcell lymphoma in a patient with psoriasis treated with ciclosporin and infliximab. Br J Dermatol 2003;149:170-3. 126. Adams AE, Zwicker J, Curiel C, Kadin ME, Falchuk KR, Drews R, et al. Aggressive cutaneous T-cell lymphomas after TNFalpha blockade. J Am Acad Dermatol 2004;51:660-2. 127. Berthelot C, Cather J, Jones D, Duvic M. Atypical CD81 cutaneous T-cell lymphoma after immunomodulatory therapy. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma 2006;6:329-32. 128. Sanli H, Ataman S, Akay BN, Yilmaz A, Yildizlar D, Gu¨rgey E. Mycosis fungoides in a patient with ankylosing spondylitis during infliximab therapy. J Drugs Dermatol 2007;6:834-6. 129. Dauendorffer JN, Rivet J, Allard A, Bachelez H. Sezary syndrome in a patient receiving infliximab for ankylosing spondylitis. Br J Dermatol 2007;156:742-3. 130. Dalle S, Balme B, Berger F, Hayette S, Thomas L. Mycosis fungoides-associated follicular mucinosis under adalimumab. Br J Dermatol 2005;153:207-8. 131. Smith KJ, Skelton HG. Rapid onset of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in patients with rheumatoid arthritis after starting tumor necrosis factor alpha receptor IgG1-Fc fusion complex therapy. J Am Acad Dermatol 2001;45:953-6. 132. Esser AC, Abril A, Fayne S, Doyle JA. Acute development of multiple keratoacanthomas and squamous cell carcinomas after treatment with infliximab. J Am Acad Dermatol 2004;50: 75-7. 133. Fryrear RS 2nd, Wiggins AK, Sangueza O, Yosipovitch G. Rapid onset of squamous cell carcinoma of the penis in a patient with psoriasis on etanercept therapy. J Am Acad Dermatol 2004;51:1026. 134. Klareskog L, Gaubitz M, Rodriguez-Valverde V, Malaise M, Dougados M, Wajdula J. Etanercept Study 301 Investigators. A long-term, open-label trial of the safety and efficacy of etanercept (Enbrel) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis not treated with other disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Ann Rheum Dis 2006;65:1578-84. 135. Lebwohl M, Blum R, Berkowitz E, Kim D, Zitnik R, Osteen C, et al. No evidence for increased risk of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving etanercept for up to 5 years. Arch Dermatol 2005;141:861-4. 136. Moore R, Owens D, Stamp G, Arnott C, Burke F, East N, et al. Mice deficient in tumor necrosis factor alpha are resistant to skin carcinogenesis. Nat Med 1999;5:828-31. 137. Starcher B. Role for tumor necrosis factor-alpha receptors in ultraviolet-induced skin tumors. Br J Dermatol 2000;142: 1140-7. 138. Chakravarty EF, Michaud K, Wolfe F. Skin cancer, rheumatoid arthritis, and tumor necrosis factor inhibitors. J Rheumatol 2005;32:2130-5. 139. Tyring S, Gordon KB, Poulin Y, Langley RG, Gottlieb AB, Dunn M, et al. Long-term safety and efficacy of 50 mg of
504 Moustou et al
J AM ACAD DERMATOL SEPTEMBER 2009
140.
141. 142.
143.
144.
145.
146.
147.
148.
149.
150.
151. 152.
etanercept twice weekly in patients with psoriasis. Arch Dermatol 2007;143:719-26. Marcil I, Stern RS. Squamous-cell cancer of the skin in patients given PUVA and ciclosporin: nested cohort crossover study. Lancet 2001;358:1042-5. Euvrard S, Kanitakis J, Claudy A. Skin cancers after organ transplantation. N Engl J Med 2003;348:1681-91. Hollenbeak CS, Todd MM, Billingsley EM, Harper G, Dyer AM, Lengerich EJ. Increased incidence of melanoma in renal transplantation recipients. Cancer 2005;104:1962-7. Fulchiero GJ Jr, Salvaggio H, Drabick JJ, Staveley-O’Carroll K, Billingsley EM, Marks JG, et al. Eruptive latent metastatic melanomas after initiation of antitumor necrosis factor therapies. J Am Acad Dermatol 2007;56:S65-7. Bovenschen HJ, Tjioe M, Vermaat H, de Hoop D, Witteman BM, Janssens RW, et al. Induction of eruptive benign melanocytic naevi by immune suppressive agents, including biologicals. Br J Dermatol 2006;154:880-4. Alaibac M, Piaserico S, Rossi CR, Foletto M, Zacchello G, Carli P, et al. Eruptive melanocytic nevi in patients with renal allografts: report of 10 cases with dermoscopic findings. J Am Acad Dermatol 2003;49:1020-2. Sfikakis PP, Kollias G. Tumor necrosis factor biology in experimental and clinical arthritis. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2003;15:380-6. Nash P, Mease PJ, Braun J, van der Heijde D. Seronegative spondyloarthropathies: to lump or split? Ann Rheum Dis 2005;64:9-13. Flier J, Boorsma DM, van Beek PJ, Nieboer C, Stoof TJ, Willemze R. Differential expression of CXCR3 targeting chemokines CXCL10, CXCL9, and CXCL11 in different types of skin inflammation. J Pathol 2001;194:398-405. Aeberli D, Seitz M, Juni P, Villiger PM. Increase of peripheral CXCR3 positive T lymphocytes upon treatment of RA patients with TNF-a inhibitors. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2005;44:172-5. Gordon KB, Bonish BK, Patel T, Leonardi CL, Nickoloff BJ. The tumor necrosis factor-a inhibitor adalimumab rapidly reverses the decrease in epidermal Langerhans cell density in psoriatic plaques. Br J Dermatol 2005;153:945-53. Theofilopoulos AN, Lawson BR. Tumor necrosis factor and other cytokines in murine lupus. Ann Rheum Dis 1999;58:149-55. Via CS, Shustov A, Rus V, Lang T, Nguyen P, Finkelman FD. In vivo neutralization of TNF-alpha promotes humoral autoimmunity by preventing the induction of CTL. J Immunol 2001;167:6821-6.
153. Allanore Y, Sellam J, Batteux F, Job Deslandre C, Weill B, Kahan A. Induction of autoantibodies in refractory rheumatoid arthritis treated by infliximab. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2004; 22:756-8. 154. Egner W. The use of laboratory tests in the diagnosis of SLE. J Clin Pathol 2000;53:424-32. 155. Ziegenhagen MW, Muller-Quernheim J. The cytokine network in sarcoidosis and its clinical relevance. J Intern Med 2003;253:18-30. 156. Sweiss NJ, Baughman RP. Tumor necrosis factor inhibition in the treatment of refractory sarcoidosis: Slaying the dragon? J Rheumatol 2007;34:2129-31. 157. Wallis RS, Ehlers S. Tumor necrosis factor and granulomas biology: explaining the differential infection risk of etanercept and infliximab. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2005;34(Suppl 1): 34-8. 158. Bhatia A, Kast RE. Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) can paradoxically increase on etanercept treatment, occasionally contributing to TNF-mediated disease. J Rheumatol 2007;34:447-9. 159. Fischer M, Fiedler E, Marsch WC, Wohlrab J. Antitumor necrosis factor-alpha antibodies (infliximab) in the treatment of a patient with toxic epidermal necrolysis. Br J Dermatol 2002;146:707-8. 160. Hunger RE, Hunziker T, Buettiker U, Braathen LR, Yawalkar N. Rapid resolution of toxic epidermal necrolysis with anti-TNFalpha treatment. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2005;116:923-4. 161. Meiss F, Helmbold P, Meykadeh N, Gaber G, Marsch WCh, Fischer M. Overlap of acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis and toxic epidermal necrolysis: response to antitumour necrosis factor-alpha antibody infliximab: report of three cases. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2007;21: 717-9. 162. Gottlieb AB, Matheson RT, Lowe N, Krueger GG, Kang S, Goffe BS, et al. A randomized trial of etanercept as monotherapy for psoriasis. Arch Dermatol 2003;139:1627-32. 163. Saurat JH, Stingl G, Dubertret L, Papp K, Langley RG, Ortonne JP, et al. Efficacy and safety results from the randomized controlled comparative study of adalimumab vs. methotrexate vs. placebo in patients with psoriasis (CHAMPION). Br J Dermatol 2008;158:558-66. 164. Schmitt J, Zhang Z, Wozel G, Meurer M, Kirch W. Efficacy and tolerability of biologic and nonbiologic systemic treatments for moderate-to-severe psoriasis: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Br J Dermatol 2008 Jul 4. [Epub ahead of print]