Tetrahedron Lcncrs. Vol. 35, No. 5. pp. 125-728. 1994 Elsevier Science Ltd printed in Great Britain 00404039B4 56.OfMMO
0040-4039(93)EO275-0
CYCLIZATION OF VINYL AND ARYL RADICALS GENERATED BY A NICKEL(I1) COMPLEX CATALYSED ELECTROREDUCTION Shigeko
Ozaki,
* Ikuo
and Faculty
Hidenobu
of Pharmaceutical
l-6,Yamadaoka,
Abstract:Radical
using
Vinyl and aryl radicals extensively
Suita,
cyclization
electroreduction
reacive towards
Horiguchi,
cyclization
are valuable
Sciences,
Osaka
Osaka-fu,
565 Japan
and
aryl
complex
halides
was
performed
by indirect
as a catalyst.
intermediates
in synthesis
than related alkyl radicals.
on vinyl and aryl radical cyclization 4 viewpoints.
the cyclization
because
they are more
Since Stork and Beckwith
developed
performed by tin hydride method from both the mechanistic
The vinyl radical induced
of eneynes using phosphorus-centered
reactions have recently been utilized radical and selenoboranes.
routes to vinyl radicals besides the use of tin hydrides, extent than those to alkyl radicals various synthetic applications. radicals
6 which
Alternative
5
have been developed
have been conducted
by many methods
to a less and met
in part, to the fact that the generation
method
such
3 for
as the atom transfer
of
or the
ester method 6b would be more difficult than the related alkyl radicals due to the
strength of sp%-X
bonds (X: halogenetc).
We have shown that the electroreductive using nickel(ll)
however,
must be ascribed,
This
by other methods than tin hydride
thiohydroxamate increased
University
chemistry of vinyl radicals 1 and aryl radicals, 2 there have been many useful studies
and synthetic
vinyl
Matsushita,
Ohmori
of vinyl
a nickel(I1)
Hidenori
complexes
as electron-transfer
generation catalysis
of alkyl radicals
from various
halides
alternative
to the tin
is a useful synthetic
hydride method 7a and is particularly useful for intermolecular alkyl radical addition to olefins 7b and intramolecular cyclization of N-allylic and N-propargyl-a-bromoamides. 7C The advantage over tin hydride method could be attributed to the lack of the active hydrogen
atom donor like tin
hydride,
to hydrogen
which
abstraction. proceeds
would Herein
according
electroreductive
elongate
the lifetimes
we describe to Scheme
generation
of the initially
the cyclization 1 to demonstrate
of vinyl and aryl radicals.
Scheme
1 725
of vinyl
formed
radicals
and aryl radicals
the effectiveness
which
of a Ni(ll)
atom
probably
complex
for
726
The reduction
peak potentials
negative than those of alkyl halides The cyclic voltammetric nickel(h) complexes of Ni(tet a)(Cl04)2
investigation
exhibiting
7bindicated
the NI(I)/Ni(lI)
reductive
buffered (NH4Cl04;
peak potential
cathode in an H-shaped catholytes (Si02)
of the nickel
were subjected
catalyst.
a supporting
than that
The electroreductive electrolyte
radical
(EtNC104; 0.1 M), a
(0.2 equiv. based on the halide) and a proton source
2 equiv. based on the halide) complex,
potentiostatically
-1.3 V using a graphite
divided cell under an inert gas.
to give the cyclized
from the
less negative
to transfer an electron to vinyl or aryl halides.
as the electron-transfer
vinyl or aryl halide (1 mmol), Ni(tet a)(Cl04)2
to be more
-2.5 V vs. SCE).
that nickel(l) species, electrogenerated
was performed in DMF (20 ml) containing
to keep the catholyte
(Table 1) were shown
redox couple at the potential
3 [Epc; - -1.35 Vj are ineffective
Thus, we selected Ni(tet a)(ClO4)2 cyclization
of vinyl and aryl halides
(Epc for simple alkyl bromides were around
to the usual extractive
at the
plate electrode
as a
After all the halides were consumed,
work-up
followed
products. g The results of the electrolysis
by column
chromatography
are summarized
in Table 1.
Table 1 Electroreductive Cyclization of Vinyl and Aryl Halides using Ni(tet a)(ClO4)2 as an Electron-transfer Catalyst a Substrates (E=COzMe)
Epcb
-2.83
Ffmol
C
Products
Products
47
2.6 Y
9@
!Ye
1.5
-2.79
2.3
4
47
ti
E 2.0
(%)d
TC
lb
-2.70
Ymld
E
E
81 f
2b
E
2c
32 F
E
3b -*.02g -2.84
86
2.7 E 4b
75
-2.14 5b
-2.70
3.f
tY 68
58
moMe 6b
‘\,M”“’ H
14 6C
a. Electmlysed as described in the text. b. Cathodic peak potential in V vs. SCE. c. Electricity consuned for complete conversion of substrate. d. Isolated yield based on substrate. e. Determined by GC. f. Eledmlysiswith 2 eqv. of PH2Pt-t. g. Ascribed to reduction of the enone group.
the
727
The resuit in Table 1 show that the present method can be a reliable method for generation of vinyl and aryl radicals to give mono- and bicyclic Cyclization
position.
of the intermediary
for 3a which
mode except
bearing
double
group
in 6-endo
which could be brought about by the disproportionation via 5exo
of 2a afforded
C-5 and
exclusively
produced
Electrolysis
on position
nearly l:l, radicals
bond at a prredictable
vinyl and aryl radicals proceeded
has a methyl
mode.
compounds
preferentially underwent
in 5-exo cyclization
a mixture of 2b and 2c in a ratio of between
mode cyclization of the vinyl radicals.
the stable
tertiary
The lack of hydrogen atom
Indeed, the electrolysis of 2a in the presence of 2 used as an active hydrogen atom donor 16 gave 2b in 81% yield as a sole
donor seems to cause thisdisproportionation. equiv. of Ph2PH
The difference
product.
that in the cyclization
in the yields of cyclic products observed
to give more stable tertiary radicals proceeds more smoothly
less stable primary radical. applied
between 1 b and 2b
The present nickel(U) catalysed
radical generation
indicates
than that giving
procedure
can be
not only to alkyl radical but to vinyl or aryl radical as well under ambient temperature
catalytic amount of the nickel reagent whereas organotin benzene
with use of a stoichiometric
provide a convenient References
and
alternative
hydride method usually requires
method should
hydride method.
Notes
1. (a) G. Stork and N. H. Baine, J. Am. Chem. Sot.. 1982, Ramanathan,
Thus, the present
amount of the hydride,
to the organotin
using
reflux in
Tetrahedron
Leti., 1983,
24,187l;
704,232l;
(b) N. M. Marinovic
and H.
(c) G. Stork and N. H. Baine, Tetrahedron
Lett., 1985,26,5927.
2.
(a) A. L. J. Beckwith and W. G. Gara, J. Chem. Sot., Perkin Trans. 7,1975, (b) A. L. J. Beckwith and G. F. Meijis, J. Chem. Sot., Chem. Commun.,
3.
(a) A. L. J. Beckwith and 0. M. O’Shea, Ft. Moor, Jr., Tetrahedron 1987,
4.
Tetrahedron
Lett., 1986,27,4529;
27,4525;
(b) G. Stok and
(c) D. Crich and S. M. Fortt., Tetrahedron
Let?.,
28,2895.
(a) J. Knight, P. J. Parsons, and R. Southgate, H. Hanessian,
P. Beaulieu,
J. Chem. Sot., Chem. Commun., 1986,
and D. Dube, Tetrahedron
P. J. Parsons J. Chem. Sot., Perkin Trans. 7,1987, 5.
Left., 1988
593 and 795;
1981,136.
(a) T. Kataoka, M. Yoshimatsu, 7. 1993,
formation
(c) J. Knight and
and M. Hori, J. C/rem. Sot., Perkin Trans
and N. K. Terette, Tetrahedron Lett., 1993,
1219.
6. The commonly application
N. S. Simpkins,
27,507l;
1237.
Y. Noda, H. Shimazu,
120; (b) J. E. Brumwell,
34,1215and
Lett., 1988,
used methods besides the tin hydride method for conducting
to organic synthesis of Carbon-Carbon
are well documented:
S. Ozaki, H. Matsushita,
1966,
al kyl radicals in
(a) Radicals in Organic Synthesis:
Bonds, 8. Gies, Pergamon
series vol. 5, 1986; (b) D. P. Curran, Synthesis, 7. (a) S. Ozaki, H. Matsushita,
Press, Oxford, Organic Chemistry
417 and 489 and references therein.
and H. Ohmori, J. Chem. Sot., Chem. Commun.,
1992,112O;
and H. Ohmori, J. Chem. Sot., Perkin Trans. I,1 993, 649; (c) S.
Ozaki, H. Matsushita, and H. Ohmori, J. Chem. Sot., ferkin Trans. 7, in the press. 8. Ni(tet a)(ClO4)2: 5,7,7,12,14,14-hexamethyl-l,4,8,11-tetraazacyclotetradecane nickel(ll) perchlorate.
454; (b)
(b)
728
9.
Spectra/ data for selected products: 1 b: 1H NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3) m, CHHCHMe), 3.74(3H, 1.67-l
2.89(1H,
s, MeC02),
.70(2H,
3.72(6H,
l.l0(3H,
d, CHH=CHP),
4.81 (lH,
s, CHH=),
m, CH2CH2CH2),
s, 2 X MeC02),
52.51 (CH3CO2), MHz, CDCt3)
s, CHkk),
2.40-2.65(2H, m, CHHCHCH),
CMe=CH2),
dd, CHHCHCMe),
2.13(lH,
CH2C=CH2),
1.34-1.43(lH,
2.25(1 H, d, CHHCl-lMe), CHHCHMe),
3.71(3H,
m, CHMe),
2.35(1 H, s, C#HC=CH2), s, MeC02),
3.72(3H,
CHH=C), 41.89(CH), (CO2Me), CHMe), ArH);
CH2C=CH2),
5.03(lH,
s, CHH=C),
49.79(CC02Me),
4.07(1H, 6b:
dd, CHHO),
1 H NMR(270
NH), 3.33(1H,
4.86(1H,
t, CHHO),
m, CHMe), 3,67(lH, t, NCHH),
2.88-3.14(2H.
M. C. Helvenston
and C. E. Castro,
J. Am. Chem.
6.75-6.92(2H,
Sm.,
(Received in Japan 6 Augurt 1993; accepted 12 Ocwber 1993)
4b: 1 H NMR(270 COCHaxHeqC,
1.33(3H,
174.89
d, Me), 3.55(1 H. m,
m, ArH),7.05-7.20(2H,
3.08(1 H, t, NCHH),
s, MeO), 6.59(2H,
1992,
4.94(1 H, s,
and 5O.64(-CH2-),
150.49(C=CH2),
ArH) . 10.
2.91(1 H, d,
s, MeC02),
40_83,41,35,
MHz, CDCl3)
3.75(3H,
4..80(lH,
MHz, CDC13),
s, =CH2),;
3.73(3H,
d, MeCH),
m,
s, MeCO2),
1 H NMR(270
108.93(CH2=C).
MHz, CDC13) l.O3(3H,
s, 2 x MeC02),
1.65 (3H, s,
m, CHCHaxHeqC,
MHz, CDCl3)
1 H NMR(200
(CD2Me).
1.89 (2H, m,
3.73(6H,
3.75(3H,
4.72(2H,
3.07(1 H, d, COHaxHeqC),
5b:
171.63
33.86,
m, CH2=CCH2CHMe),
2.62-2.89(6H,,
13C NMR(67.8
31.16,
2.40(1 H, s, CH#C=CH2),
s, MeC02),
52.72(CH3CO2),
208.32(CH2COCH2);
3b:
1.58-1.79(2H,
MHz, CDC13) 2.04(1 H, dd, CHCHaxHeqC), COCH2CH,and
m, CHHCHMe),
s, C(Me)=CH2], 5.02(1 H, s, CHH=C);
4.84[2H,
d, MeCH),
s, CH2C=CH2),
24.17,
MHz, CDCl3),
s, MeC02),
MHz, CDCl3)
d, CHMeMe),
m, CH2C=CH2),
1H NMR(270
3.73(3H,
s, MeC02),
2.68(2H,
110.64(Ci-i2=C),
2.48-2.57(1H.
3.29[1 H, m, CHC(Me)=CH2],
3.73(3H,
MHz, CDCl3)
0.85(3H,
2.89(2H, 2c:
2.552.61(2H
lc: fH NMR(200
m, CH2CH2CH2), 13C(67.8
d, CHMeMe),
4.99(1 H, s, CHH=C);
0.96(3H,
d, CHhC=CH2),
56.73[C(C02Me)2],
0.81(3H,
4.81(1 H, s, CHH=C),
s. CHH=C),
3.05(lH,
s, CH2=C),
and 39.66(CH2),
1.76(1 H, d, CHHCHMe),
4.91 (lH,
2.04-2.15(4H,
4.74(2H,
2b: 1H NMR(200 CHHCHCH),
d, MeCH),
114,849O.
m,
3.1611 H, br, s,
s,ArH),6.71(1H,
s,