Dehydrogenative sulfenylation of cyclohexanones

Dehydrogenative sulfenylation of cyclohexanones

Tetrahedron Letters No. 19, pp 1667 - 1670, 1978. @ PergaxnonPress Ltd. Printed in Great Britain. DEHYDROGENATIVE m40-4039/78/0501-1667. SULFENYLAT...

186KB Sizes 2 Downloads 93 Views

Tetrahedron Letters No. 19, pp 1667 - 1670, 1978. @ PergaxnonPress Ltd. Printed in Great Britain.

DEHYDROGENATIVE

m40-4039/78/0501-1667.

SULFENYLATION

p!o2.00/0.

OF CYCLOHEXANONES

Barry M. Trost and James H. Rigby Department of Chemistry University of Wisconsin-Madison Madison, Wisconsin 53706

(Received in IJSA27 December 1977; received in UK for publication 23 March 1978) The sulfenylation of applications

of carbonyl

for the resultant

The use of disulfides aprotic

conditions

because

in alcohol

in methanolic

methoxide

underwent

triggered the

to be restricted

the ability

and modification',

to strong bases under back to the parent

to cleave cyclobutanones

by sulfenylation

a,a-bis-sulfenylatedcyclobutanone

intermediate

As a result of this study, we examined

of norbornanone.

but not fragmentation--a

elaboration

to reduce cL-thiocarbonyl compounds

fragmentation3. inertness

as a result of the diversity

in structural

thought

in which the reversibly-formed

and determined

sulfenylation

We reported

attention

compounds

is normally

of the known ability

solvents2.

nucleophilically

cycloalkanones

has attracted

a-thiocarbonyl

for such reactions

by thiolates

suffers

compounds

reaction

other

On the other hand, cycloheptanone

which

suggests

the feasibility

of alkoxide

0 )

PhSSPh NaOCH3,

undergo

solvents

a remarkably

forms the subject

as a potential

mild aromatization

of this letter.

to phenolsmakesthis Table 1 and eq

reaction

+

phs&SPh

CH30H

56% bases in alcohol

&Ph

1 method

for the direct

accompanying

sulfenylation

sulfenylation

The fact that few methods

of special

1 of ketones.

Cyclohexanoru

to give o-phenylthiophenols

are available

to convert

which

cyclohexanones

interest4.

1 summarize the examples of this new dehydrogenation

procedure.

The major

Eq 1

1668

No. 19

by-product verified

TABLE 1.

observed

by 'H and

is the bis-sulfenylated 13

C nmr spectroscopy

Dehydrogenative

Entry

Sulfenylation

phenol.

and, in some cases, comparison

4-t-butylcyclohexanone

2

cyclohexanone

group was

with data of known samples5.

% Yield

Product OH

1

of the phenylthio

of Cyclohexanonesa

Time (hr)

Ketone

The ortho position

OH

72

40

3

tetralone

4

3-isopropylcyclohexanone

18

5

2-methylcyclohexanone

25

6

&

192

120

(a) A typical procedure involved refluxing a mixture and 6 mmol of sodium methoxide in 15 ml of methanol. (e) Mp 73-77.5".

of 1 mmol of ketone, 4 mmol of diphenyl disulfide (c) See ref 5a. (d) See ref 5b. (b) Mp 73-4".

Only one alkyl group may be present at an alpha position. led to a 4:3 mixture

of mono- and bissulfenylated

ketones,

For example,

but no phenol.

2,6-dimethylcyclohexanone

A 2,2-dialkylcycohexanone

Eo 2

does not aromatize aromatization.

with dealkylation.

Diketone

5 undergoes

On the other hand, dehydrogenative

secosulfenylation

sulfenylation

unaccompanied

of cyclohexanones

by

is normally

much

No. 19

1669

h

(b) R = PhS

PhS faster than secosulfenylation Control

experiments

under these conditions intermediate

verify

in agreement

is noteworthy

long reaction since normally

A possible

with earlier

6

related

to the products

observations6.

ketones were isolated

times required monounsaturated

rationalization

C02CH3

(see Table 1, entry 6).

that the phenols

mono- and bissulfenylated

extraordinarily

analogs.

of cyclobutanones

(a) R = H

R

PhS

do not undergo

In the case of tetralone,

and shown to convert

in this case compared systems aromatize

sulfenylation

(eq 3) invokes a Favorskii-like

to product.

to the saturated

more rapidly

the The

cyclohexanones

than their saturated

reaction'

which requires

the

O0 SPh

7

_

8 Eq 3

O0

R&m_ qy (a) R = H

9

(b) R = PhS ability

to form the bissulfenylated

This rationale generation

enolate

nicelyaccommodatesall

of the equivalent

7 (or its enol) as a precursor

of our observations

of 7 (i.e. 10) requires II

especially

to the zwitterion

the tetralone

loss of aromaticity.

8.

case since the

Support for this inter-

so

c S

10 __ pretation

derives

11 __

from the conversion

which can be envisioned 2-enones

Q

by treating

to involve

of cyclopentanone

to 2-phenylthiocyclopent-2-enone

the enol forms related

a-dialkylsulfonium

ethylenedithiocyclohexanone

C02R

C02R

11 with base __

cyclohexanones 10

to _ 7 - I 9,the obtention

with sulfenimides',

of 2-arylthiocyclohex.

and the aromatization

--in the last case a Favorskii-like

of

process was also invoked

1670

No. 19

This reaction

provides

group for further

elaboration

the parent phenols

Acknowledgment. Health

access

to ortho substituted

provides

great opportunities.

and thus would constitute

Science

The flexibility

Desulfurization

one of the mildest

We wish to thank the National

for their generous

phenols.

methods

Foundation

of the phenylthio

also provides

entry to

for this transformation.

and the National

Institutes

of

support of our programs.

References 1.

B. M. Trost, T. N. Salzmann, and K. Hiroi, J. Amer. Chem. Sot., & 4487 (1976); D. Seebach and M. Teschner, Chem. Ber., 109, 1601 (1976). Also see T. Kumamoto, S. Kobayashi, and T. Mukaiyama, Bull. Chem. Sot. Japan, $5, 866 (1972). For a review see B. M. Trost, Accounts Chem. Res., submitted for publication,

2.

M. Oki, W. Funakoshi, Funakoshi, ibid., =, 44

3.

B. M. Trost and J. H. Rigby, J. Org. Chem., 41, 3217 (1976).

4.

M. S. Kablaoni, J. Org. Chem., a, 2126 (1974); H. Seeboth and B. Burnowski, @, 700, 50 (1966); D. A. Shirley and W. L. Dean, J. Amer. Chem. Sot., 77, 6077 (1955); W. von E. DoeriFand F. M. Beringer, ibid., 2, 2221 (1949); E. Beckman and H. Eickelberg, Chem. Ber., 2, 418 (1896).

5.

(a) G. E. Hilbert and T. B. Johnson, J. Amer. Chem. Sot., U. S. Pat. 3,188,352; Chem. Abstr., 63,

6.

T. Fujisawa, M. Yamamoto, and G. Tsuchihashi, 3. Org. Chem., 38, 687 (1973).

7.

F. G. Bordwell,

Accounts

8.

H. J. Monteiro,

J. Org. Chem., 42, 2324 (1977).

9.

T. Mukaiyama,

10.

s. Takano,

and A. Nakamura, 832 (1971).

T. Adachi,

S. Yamada,

Bull. Chem. Sot. Japan, 44, 828 (1971); M. Oki and W.

Synthesis,

2,

1526 (1929);

(b) W. Reifschneider,

624 (1972); T. Fujisawa

and T. Kojima,

Chem. Res., 3, 281 (1970).

and T. Kumamoto,

K. Tamigawa,

Bull. Chem. Sot. Japan, 44, 3155 (1971).

S. Hatakeyawa,

and K. Ogasawara,

Heterocycles,

4, 953 (1976).