Vpl. 40, No. 4, 1970
BIOCHEMICAL
AND BlOPHYSlCAL
RESEARCH COMMUNlCATlONS
DENATmATIONOF DNA AFTEB X-IFBADIATIOhTVITRO Hanjit
Das Gupta and Sankar Mitra
Department of Microbiology Sose Institute, Calcutta 9, India
ReceivedJune24, 1970 X-irradiation of E. coli DNA caused partial strandseparation as judged by sus?%pmiity of the DNA to nuclease specific for single-stranded DNA, namely an endonuclease from Neurospora crassa and exonuclease I of E. coli. The elution profile of X-irradiated DNA from hydroxyapatite column showed that single-stranded fragments were produced. These fragments had a sedimentation coefficient of 3-4s corresponding to a length of about 250 nucleotides. suMMJmY:
The primary target bacteria
is believed
X-irradiation (b) alteration
of X-ray-induced
to be DNA (1).
and viscosity
(2-S).
trate
Among these electrometric
The measurement of viscosity from strand-breakage
changes in hydrodynamic parameters.
An increase in the ultraviolet
absorbance of DNA as a result
after X-irradiation
tion of bases (2).
(I-5).
spectroscopy,
strand-separation
because both cause similar, denaturation
on DNA of
of DNA after X-irradiation
was studied by ultraviolet
could not distinguish
report
The main effects
and (d) strand-separation
phenomena, the strand-separation titration
damage in
both --in vivo and --in vitro are (a) strand scissions, and elimination of bases, (c) intra- and inter-
strand cross links in vitro
lethal
could be offset
of
by the destruc-
In the present communication, we wish to
the use of enzymatic assay and chromatography to demonsthe formation
of single-strand
stranded DNA as a result
fragments from double-
of X-irradiation. 793
Vol. 40, No. 4, 1970
MAT&3IALS
BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNKATION$
AND M.WEODS
32P-labeled modified
MJA was isolated
procedure
low-phosphate
medium
109 ml medium) 1-2 x ,06 molar
of "larmur
was added.
cpm/p.mole.
equivalent
Na-phosphate, a Mullard
method
hour
were
X-ray
further
there
was no after
after
X-irradiation.
upto
per minute.
After
chilled
to 0'
effect
at 80 KVp without FeSOq dosimetry
irradiation, and left
was purified
An endonuclease
the DNA for
showed
for
from Neuromra --I_ crassa (10).
that
E. JYJO~ B accor-
singlemycelia
These nucleases
products
was necessary
an
of D?;A
from
specific
of Linn
about
on hydroxyapatite
DNA to acid-soluble which
operated
properties
(9).
to an extent
to degrade
90 to
of 10%
of
DNA. The incubation :
denatured), MgC12,
as
at room temperature
physical
the
of chromatography
at an amount
detiatured
mC per
!.fm/ml in G.GSM
(8)
stage
native
0.2
Freifelder
I of -E. coli
to the procedure
degraded
follows
in
DNA was purified
according
1-Y:
the
to Lehman
stranded
a
of the D?,YAwas
by Fricke's
processing.
Exonuclease
ding
atmosphere MG 150
generator,
were immediately
cells
a t about
in ordinary
was 3.2 Krads
before
in
of DNA was expressed
irradiated
The dose as estimated
samples
32P (0.3
activity
The concentration
PI; 6.8
any filter.
were grown
carrier-free
The specific
B by a slightly
of phosphorus.
Dfi1A samples
from
i3. col&
The bacteria
(6).
to which
(7)
from
For
exonuclease
20 nyl.moles;
2 kmoles,
conditions I,
for
the
enzymes were
32P DNA (irradiated,
Na-glycinate
8-mercaptoethanol
buffer, 0.3
794
native pI? 9.5,
&mole and the
as or heat-
30 trmoles;
enzyme
in an
Vol. 40, No. 4, 1970
BIOCHEMICAL
amount sufficient
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
to degrade 95% of heat-denatured
volume of 0.3 ml.
D1JAin a total
In the case of Neurospora crassa endonuclease,
mixture was, 32 P-DXA, 20 m!fmoles; Tris-Cl
the reaction 30
AND BIOPHYSICAL
pH 7.5,
yrmoles; MgC12, 3 \tmoles and the enzyme in an amount necessary
to degrade 9O$ of the denatured DNA in a total In both cases, after
incubation
volume of 0.3 ml.
at 37' for 30 min, the reaction
mixtures were chilled,
0.1 ml unlabeled and crude Z. -- coli DNA (2.5 mg[ml) and 0.4 ml 7% HC101,were added. After IO min. at O", the precipitated 10
DNA was removed by centrifugation
min) in the cold and the radioactivity
(10,000 x g,
of an aliquot
of the
supernatant was counted in an end-window GM-counter (DAE, India). Hydroxyapatite
was prepared according to the method of
Miyazawa and Thomas (11).
Hydroxyapatite
columns (3.5 cm x
1.2 cm> were used to separate double-stranded stranded DNA either linear
gradient
by stepwise elution
(total
phosphate, pH 6.8.
1-2
or by elution
with a
volume of 200 ml) of 0.05 to O.&F! Naml of DNA corresponding to 6x10~ to IO5
cpm was loaded on the column. about 95%.
from single-
The recovery of radioactivity
was
The denatured and the native DNA were eluted at about
0.19M and 0.26M Na-phosphate respectively.
Table 1.
Susceptibility of X-irradiated DNA to nucleases specific for single-stranded DNA.
X-ray dose (Kilorads)
9.6
Susceptibility to E. coli exonuclease I (Per cent) 4.7
Susceptibility to Neurosporq crassa endonuclease (Per cent)
5.6
'795
Vol. 40, No. 4, 1970
BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNKATIONS
-BZWLTS __----_A&D DWJJSSI@ X-irradiated both
Neurosuora
The extent Since in
endonuclease
of degradation
the
the
This
strand
and double-strand
X-ray
used,
least
in
is
I should
This
clease
not
or DNA partially presumably
because
photoproducts
(Fig.?).
It
presence
that,
to the position
and was found
to be mostly
endonuclease.
Thus its
The correspondence tible
to
fragments
of
the nucleases from
the
there
total
susceptible
and the
dimers
such exonuDNA
and other
in hydroxyapatite
is no radioactivity DNA in the
DNA was eluted
of denatured
amount
that
the
- irradiation,
chromatographed
of total. fraction
hydroxyapatite
column 796
unirradi-
as denatured
The fraction DNA was concentrated
(92%) to Meurosuora
single-stranded the
at
because
fact
of
Unpublished).
DNA was chromatographed.
corresponding
at the dose
to degrade
the
of thymine
of denatured the
3’-
single-
place
of U.V.
while
position
free
single-stranded
as a result
DNA, 4.5% of
DNA when irradiated
of
u.v.-irradiated
and Mitra,
evident
to the
control
in view
DNA was then
is
corresponding ated
to be unable
of the
is clear
base destruction
be expected
(Dasgupta
X-irradiated
Also,
of DNA has taken
denatured
it have
regions
degrade
anywhere degrades
extensive
significant
is pertinent
comment
I could
that
bonds
would
in DITA (I).
I).
were comparable.
(9,10),
causes
to
I (Table
exonuclease
St-ends
X-ray
breaks
denatured
the
regions
because
is unlikely
the
exonulcease DYA ‘ .
likely
it
the
single-stranded
ends,
exonuclease
two enzymes
while
from
susceptible
phosphodiester
regions,
DBA only
of the
and E. _ coli
hydrolyzes
single-stranded
most
to be partially
by these
endonuclease
single-stranded that
DNA was found
nature
was confirmed.
irradiated eluted indicates
DNA suscep-
as single-stranded that
the ,frag-
Vol. 40, No. 4, 1970
BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
40:
FRACTION
NUMBER
Gradient elution of %, QJJJ. DNA from hydroxyapatite Fig.1. DRA (A-A); Heat-denatured DNA (0-O); column . Native X-irradiated DBA (9.6 Cads), (0-O).
ments
were
strand
produced
and/or
experiments,
double-strand particularly
irradiated,
beside
DNA was obtained the
position
DNA was also the Neurospora single-stranded existing cular
by simultaneous breakage
which
of double-stranded susceptible
is possible,
were produced breaks,
very
while
in
few single-strand 797
from the
This
DNA. degree that
DNA with
by
the pre-
case of high breaks,
was
in between
to a varying
Thus it
In other
denatured
hydroxyapatite
to degradation
fragments
partially
and single-stranded
endonuclease.
DNA with
from
DNA.
DNA of T7 phage
'fragments,
was eluted
and single-
of irradiated
when homogeneous
single-stranded
single-strand weight
denaturation
mole-
single-
Vol. 40, No. 4, 1970
stranded
BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
fragments
single
strands
of the
X-irradiation
centrifugation
with
cient
as compared
tion,
with
9.6
after
single-stranded
2).
about
DNA fragments
Krads,
DNA was reduced
26s as the
to 6.5s
fragments
was about
molecular
weight
the
range
of 7 to 8x10~
nucleotides.
X-irradiation
BOTTOM4
reference
the
3-4s.
of the
8
E.
coli
average
that
daltons,
After
irradia-
of the
formula
to about
20
used here
24
26
native DNA
(121,
was calculated
dose level
16
coeffi-
single-stranded
corresponding
at the
12 FRACTJOM
DNA.
Studier's
fragments
gradient
DPA had a broad
coefficient
of the
Applying latter
produced
sedimentation
T7 phage
sedimentation
while
protruding
by sucrose-density
The native
to the
DI?A with
X-irradiation.
was investigated (Fig.
distribution
as double-stranded
were obtained
The size after
as well
the
to be in 250 increased
32
NUMBER
Fig.2. Sucrose-gradient centrifugation profile of X-irradiated DNA. Fractions corresponding to single-stranded and doublestranded DNA after hydroxyapatite chromatography were separately pooled and concentrated b dialysis against 60% sucrose in 0.05M Na-phosphate, pH 6. B and was subsequently layered on 5-20s linear gradient of sucrose in IM NaC1, 0.0114 Tris-Cl, Centrifugation was carried out in Sti 39 O.OOM EDTA, pH 7.5’. swinging out rotor of Spinco ultracentrifuge, model L at 37,000 rpm for 240 min at lo. Fractions of equal volume were collected from 8 he bottom. The arrow indicates the position of T7 phage DNA (S20,w = 31s). X-irradiated DNA; c----J, singlestranded & a
DNA; (O-O), double-stranded DNA (A-A.) is also shown. 798
DNA.
T!,e unirradiated
yol. 4QNo.4,
BIOCHEMICAL
197!!
the acid-soluble
radioactivity
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
only slightly
and hence very small
fragments could not have been produced. The mechanism of X-ray induced denaturation long stretch --et al.
of pol.ynucleotide
chains is not understood.
(2) suggested that X-irradiation
of single-stranded
over such a Scholes
might cause the formation
fragments but they estimated that the number
of hydrogen bond pairs broken per chain break would be of the order of 14 to 16.
Our figure
higher than the above estimate. extent of denaturation
is at least
an order of magnitude
It is not clear whether the
is dependent on the wavelength of X-ray
used. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The authors wish to thank the Council of Scientific Industrial
Research, India for a research grant.
Bhattacharjee kindly
of Saha Institute
made available
their
and
Dr. S.B.
of Nuclear Physics, Calcutta
X-ray generator.
REFERENCES ::
Freifelder, D., Radiation Res. Suppl. 6, 80 (1966). Scholes, G., Ward, J.F. and Weiss, J.J., J. Mol. Biol., 379
2,
(1960).
Cox, R.A., Overend, W.G., Peacocke, A.R. and Wilson, S., Proc. Roy. SOC. B., 169, 511 (1958). 4. Peacocke, A.R. and Preston, B.N,., Proc. Roy. Sot. B., m, 3.
133 (1960).
5. Collyns, B., Okada, S., Scholes, G., Weiss, J.J. and Wheeler, C.M., Radiation Res., 3, 526 (1965). Marmur, J., J. Mol. Biol., 1, 208 (1961). ;: Thomas, C.A. and Abelson, J., in Proc. Nucleic Acid Res., G.L. Cantoni and D.R. Davies (Editors), Harper and Row, New York, 1966, P. 553. Freifelder, D., Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. (USA), 2, 128 (1965). ;: Lehman, I.R., in Proc. Nucleic Acid Res., G.L. Cantoni and D.R# Davies (Editors) Harper and Row, New York, 1966, p.203. IO. Linn, S., in Methods in Enzymology, L.. Grossman and K. Moldave (Editors), vol. XII, Academic Press, New York, 1967, p. 247. 11. Miyazawa, Y. and Thomas, C.A., J. Mol. Biol., II, 223 (1965). 12. Studier, F.W., J. Mol. Biol., 11, 373 (1965). 799