Dendritic cells, T cells and lymphatics: dialogues in migration and beyond

Dendritic cells, T cells and lymphatics: dialogues in migration and beyond

Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Dendritic cells, T cells and lymphatics: dialogues in migration and beyond Marc Permanyer1, B...

975KB Sizes 0 Downloads 47 Views

Available online at www.sciencedirect.com

ScienceDirect Dendritic cells, T cells and lymphatics: dialogues in migration and beyond Marc Permanyer1, Berislav Bosˇnjak1 and Reinhold Fo¨rster Immune cells continuously recirculate through lymph vessels en route from peripheral tissues to the blood. Leuyte trafficking into and within lymph vessels is mediated by an interply with lymphatic endothelial cells (LECs). However, lymphatic vessels are much more than mere conduits for fluid and immune cell transport. Data accumulating during past several years indicate that LECs support T cell survival, induce tolerance to selfantigens, inhibit exaggerated T cell proliferation during immune response and maintain T cell memory. Reciprocally, leukocytes impact LEC biology: lymphatic vessel permeability depends on DCs while lymphocytes regulate LEC proliferation during inflammation. Altogether, these novel results provide important insights on intimate connections between LECs and leukocytes that contribute to the understanding of immune responses. Address Institute of Immunology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany Corresponding author: Fo¨rster, Reinhold ([email protected]) 1 These authors contributed equally. Current Opinion in Immunology 2018, 53:xx–yy This review comes from a themed issue on Lymphangiogenesis: heterogeneity and function

entered the LN from the blood via high endothelial venules (HEV) and now continue their way towards the bloodstream. Of note, lymphocyte recirculation through lymph, as well as through blood, is influenced by a circadian rhythm, peaking during the day and being lowest during the night [4,5]. During inflammation, the number of leukocytes in afferent lymph increases, as well as the frequency of neutrophils and monocytes [1–3]. On the other hand, the number of leukocytes within the efferent lymph decreases within first 24 hours after infection due to a phenomenon called LN shut down that prevents egress of cells from inflamed LNs. After three to four days cell counts in the efferent lymph rise again due to increased efflux of newly proliferated lymphocytes [1– 3]. Results accumulating during recent years indicate that lymphatic vessels are not only highways for the transport of fluid and immune cells but that lymphatic endothelial cells (LECs) also affect the survival, activation and proliferation of DC and T cells. On the other hand, lymphocytes and DCs also impact on LEC proliferation during inflammation and have profound effects on lymphatic vessel integrity, respectively. In this review we will, therefore, discuss reciprocal interactions of LECs with DCs and T cells, the two main leukocyte populations present in the lymph (summarized in Figure 1).

Edited by S. Sozzani and M. Presta

LECs mediate DC and T cell migration through lymphatics https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coi.2018.05.004

DC entry into lymphatic capillaries

0952-7915/ã 2018 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Intravital microscopy studies have provided detailed insights into the cellular processes directing DC migration into afferent lymphatics (for recent reviews see ref. [6–8]). It is well accepted that LECs-imprinted haptotactic gradients of the chemokine CCL21 attract DCs, which express the CCL21 receptor CCR7, towards lymphatic vessels [9]. Once tackled, transmigration across LECs also requires initial docking of DCs to CCL21 on LECs [10]. Interestingly, it has been recently shown that DCs do not encounter pre-immobilized CCL21 but trigger local CCL21 secretion from LECs [11], therefore stimulating their own transmigration through loose flaplike openings left between LECs [12]. LECs also direct leukocyte migration via atypical chemokine receptors (ACKRs) that internalize chemokines without transducing signals and therefore act as a sink for chemokines bound to them. ACKR2 on inflamed endothelial cells can selectively scavenge inflammatory, but not homeostatic chemokines such as CCL21 thus ensuring that only appropriate interactions of mature DCs with homeostatic chemokines occur at this stage [13]. Moreover, skin

Introduction To patrol the organism, leukocytes constantly migrate via blood and lymph between lymphoid organs and peripheral tissues. Cell turnover through the peripheral tissue is enormous: in humans and sheep every hour up to five million cells pass through the lymphatic vessels draining the lower part of the (hind) leg [1–3]. Under non-inflammatory conditions the majority of the cells present in the afferent, that is, lymph that drains from the periphery towards the first draining lymph node (LN), are T cells (up to 90%) and dendritic cells (DCs; up to 10%), accompanied by some neutrophils, B cells and monocytes [1–3]. The cell composition of the lymph changes after passing the draining LN. In this efferent lymph, as it is now called, primarily naı¨ve B and T cells are found that www.sciencedirect.com

Current Opinion in Immunology 2018, 53:173–179

174 Lymphangiogenesis: heterogeneity and function

Figure 1

Summary of recently identified interactions between LECs and leucocytes that regulate immune responses during migration. (a) Leukocytes extravasate from peripheral tissues into lymphatic capillaries in a CCL21-dependent manner upon interaction with LECs [9,10]. DCs also use hyaluronan (HA) for binding to LYVE-1 expressed on LECs to enter lymph vessels in the skin [19]. (b) Lymphocytes roll in lymphatic capillaries in an integrin-dependent manner following CCL21 gradients, before they are passively carried away with the lymph flow in the afferent lymph vessels towards draining LN [21]. (c) ACKR4-mediated scavenging of CCL21 by LECs on the ceiling of LN subcapsular sinus (cLECs) shapes functional chemokine gradients that enhance DC translocation into LN parenchyma [36,37]. (d) S1P expression by LECs from LN cortical sinusoids regulates lymphocyte exit [39]. (e) Reciprocally, LECs can induce tolerance to self-antigens via direct presentation cross-presentation or of peripheral tissue antigens (PTA) in the context of MHC class I molecules [45–48] or by antigen transfer to the DCs for presentation in the context of MHC class II molecules [47]. (f) LECs can promote survival of naı¨ve T cells in LNs by expressing IL-7 and S1P [40,41,42] and prevent exaggerated T cell proliferation by releasing nitric oxide (NO) and indoleamine 2,3 dioxygenase (IDO) [53,54]. (g) Additionally, lymphatic permeability depends on the interaction of CCR7-expressing IFN regulatory factor 4-positive (IRF4+) dendritic cells with collecting vessels [63].

stromal cell-expressed ACKR4 mediates scavenging of CCL19 thus creating a chemokine gradient towards terminal lymphatics that can be efficiently followed by CCR7-expressing DCs [14]. Other molecules produced by LECs required for DC migration into lymphatics include podoplanin [15], semaphorins [16], galectin-1 [17], sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) receptor 1 (S1PR1) and S1PR3 [18] and the lymphatic vessel endothelial protein 1 (LYVE-1) [19]. Specifically, DC use hyaluronan to adhere to LYVE-1 expressed on LECs and to transmigrate through the endothelial monolayer via LYVE-1-enriched ring-like structures surrounding the migrating DC [19] (Figure 1a). Within the lumen of Current Opinion in Immunology 2018, 53:173–179

lymphatic capillaries, DCs crawl towards collecting vessels by CCL21 chemokine gradients before falling into collecting vessels where cells are passively transported by lymph flow [20] (Figure 1b). T cell entry into lymphatic capillaries

In comparison to DCs, less is known about the mechanisms regulating T cell trafficking from peripheral tissues into afferent lymphatics. While naı¨ve T cells are restrained from the entry into the peripheral tissues, memory T cells represent the main cell type that recirculate between peripheral tissues and LN during noninflammatory, homeostatic conditions [1–3]. During www.sciencedirect.com

Cross talks between immune and lymphatic endothelial cells Permanyer, Bonjak and Fo¨rster 175

inflammation, activated T cells can also leave the inflamed tissue via afferent lymphatics and travel back to the LN [21]. Interestingly, in both steady-state and inflammatory conditions CD8+ T cells appear to egress from the skin less efficiently than CD4+ T cells [2,3,22]. The molecular events regulating T cell retention or exit from peripheral tissue are still largely unclear [23,24]. It is widely accepted that CCR7 mediates T cell exit from peripheral tissue [25,26] while S1PR1 regulates their retention [27]. In addition, several other molecules expressed on lymphatics have been reported to regulate lymphocyte migration, including macrophage mannose receptor [28], clever-1/stabilin-1 [29] and lymphotoxin receptor (LTbR) with the latter being specifically used by transmigrating T regs [30]. The molecular events regulating T cell entry into lymphatic vessels, however, have not been imaged until recently [21]. Using intravital microscopy it was shown that, in steady state, T cells actively crawl from tissue into lymphatic capillaries but are passively transported once they entered lymphatic collectors [21]. By contrast, under inflammatory conditions, T cells require interaction of LFA-1 with LECexpressed ICAM-1 to increase their speed in lymphatic capillaries [21], resembling the requisites previously found for DC transmigration during inflammation [31] (Figure 1b). Afferent lymph vessel DC and T cell entry into LNs

Cells travelling within the afferent lymph are drained into the LN subcapsular sinus (SCS), a space between LN capsule and cortex. The SCS enwraps the LN and merges into the medullary sinus from which lymph leaves the organ via efferent lymphatics. The SCS is further connected to the medullary sinus through cortical sinusoids and to high endothelial venules (HEV) of the T cell zone via fibroblastic reticular cell (FRC)-coated conduits. The latter serve as transport routes for small molecular weight molecules towards DCs residing next to HEV. Within the LN, LECs are subdivided according to their anatomical location [32] and expression of different markers including PD-L1, ICAM-1 and MAdCAM-1 in mice [33] and Prox1, LYVE1 and STAB2 in humans [34]. These subsets include (i) SCS-lining S-LECs, (ii) cortical sinusoidslining C-LECs and (iii) medullary sinus(oids)-lining MLECs. Differential expression of 685 genes including chemokines, adhesion molecules and growth factors between S-LECs and M-LECs [35] implies that divergent LEC populations have distinct functions in mediating lymphocyte trafficking. We have shown earlier that SLECs lining the ceiling of the SCS express ACKR4, thereby shaping CCL21 (and possibly CCL19) gradients that are important for DC immigration into the LN parenchyma [36,37] (Figure 1c). On the other hand, SLEC lining the SCS floor express plasmalemma vesicleassociated protein (PLVAP or MECA-32) that has been suggested to restrict lymphocyte entry into the LN by forming diaphragms in transendothelial channels [38]. If www.sciencedirect.com

not co-injected with DCs, naı¨ve T cells do not penetrate S-LECs but migrate from the medulla in a retrograde manner into the parenchyma using medullary sinusoids [8,37]. In the slow flowing lymph within the LN medullary sinus the migration pattern of T cells depends on the balance of expression of CCR7 and S1PR1 (reviewed in [39]). High concentration of S1P in lymph induces internalization S1PR1, allowing naı¨ve T cells to migrate towards CCR7 ligands expressed by stromal cells in the LN parenchyma. On the other hand, within the LN parenchyma CCR7 ligands induce CCR7 desensitization while S1PR1 gets re-expressed. Both events render T cells more sensitive towards S1P present in the lymph and thereby mediating their egress from the LN (Figure 1d). It remains to be determined whether other lymph-derived lymphocyte subtypes such as memory T cells, activated T cells or B cells can enter the lymph node parenchyma at all and, in case they do, whether they use direct (via the SCS floor) or indirect entry routes (via medullary sinusoids) LECs regulate T cell egress into efferent lymph

T cells emigrating from the LN parenchyma are collected in the medullary sinus and then drained into the efferent lymph vessel. As LN are organized in chains [36,37], cells exiting from the most distal LN in a chain will pass a series of LN before they eventually reach the thoracic duct and return into blood. For each LN in a chain, cells will presumably go through the same “decision process” of entering or bypassing that LN [8].

LECs regulate T cell survival and activation LECs promote T cell survival

Besides providing a framework for lymphocyte recirculation, LECs also support T cell survival during migration [40,41,42] (Figure 1f). LN LECs produce high amounts of IL-7 [41,42], a cytokine that provides anti-apoptotic signals to lymphocytes. In addition, group from Susan Schwab recently reported that S1P produced by LN LECs, apart from regulating lymphocyte exit from the LN, also promotes survival of naı¨ve T cells by supporting their mitochondrial function and thus providing cells with the energy for migration [40]. It will be interesting to find out whether S1P also affects the survival of other immune cell subsets, which is likely due to importance of S1P on DC functionality [18]. LECs present antigens

LECs also regulate T cell activation (reviewed recently in [43,44]). In homeostatic conditions, LN LECs express multiple peripheral tissue antigens (Figure 1e). These are presented in the context of MHC class I molecules together with high levels of PD-L1, which leads to PD-1 expression on CD8+ T cells and their subsequent ablation [45–47]. Moreover, LN LECs can scavenge lymph-borne antigens and cross-present them to CD8+ T cells, inducing their aberrant activation and exhaustion Current Opinion in Immunology 2018, 53:173–179

176 Lymphangiogenesis: heterogeneity and function

[48]. In contrast, it seems that LECs do not present selfantigens in the context of MHC class II molecules, but rather pass them to DCs to induce CD4+ T cell energy [47]. Altogether, these data indicate that steady-state LN LECs substantially contribute to the induction of peripheral T cell tolerance, as is already well described for liver sinusoidal endothelial cells [49]. In addition to the presentation of self-antigens, LN LECs have been reported to serve as antigen reservoirs for several weeks following vaccination or viral infection [50]. Similar to self-antigens, foreign antigens can also be handed over from LECs to migratory DCs for being presented to T cells [50,51], a process that might be important for maintenance of resident memory CD4+ T cells in the LN [52]. LECs regulate T cell proliferation during inflammation

Besides presenting antigens, cytokine-stimulated LECs can also directly inhibit T cell proliferation by releasing nitric oxide and indoleamine 2,3 dioxygenase [53,54] (Figure 1f). Moreover, TNFa-stimulated LECs decrease CD86 expression on immature or TNFa-stimulated DCs dampening their ability to further stimulate T cell proliferation [55]. These data suggest that LECs might interfere with T cell activation during ongoing immune response, thereby counteracting potentially overshooting immune responses.

DCs and lymphocytes regulate LEC functions

of collecting lymphatic vessels is regulated by the interaction of CCR7-expressing IRF4+ DCs with LECs [63] (Figure 1g). Moreover, sampling of lymph-borne antigen by adipose tissue DCs induces their CCR7-dependent recruitment into skin-draining LN [62]. This finding suggests that collecting lymphatic vessel leakage would reinforce an ongoing immune response by supplementing the draining LN with an extra pool of antigen-bearing DCs [62]. Moreover, these DCs support secondary immune responses of antigen-specific T cells that reside in the adipose tissue and provide protection against recurrent infections [62,64]. By contrast, others have reported that gut bacterial infection can lead to the formation of highly permeable lymph vessels that redirect DCs into mesenteric adipose tissue and prevent them from migrating to LNs, thus compromising mucosal immune responses [65]. Similarly, lymphocyte aggregates resembling tertiary lymphoid organs (TLOs) have been recently identified aligned with collecting lymphatic vessels in Crohns disease mesentery [66]. Furthermore, these TLOs-like structures might potentially compromise lymphatic vessel integrity raising the possibility that remodelling of lymphatic vessels and thus impaired lymph drainage could affect the course of the disease [66]. Therefore, lymph vessel permeability is a double-edged sword that can reinforce but also interfere with immune responses. Clearly, more studies are needed to understand the contribution of lymphatic vessel permeability to autoimmune and inflammatory diseases.

Lymphoangiogenesis during inflammation

At the sites of tissue inflammation macrophages and granulocytes secrete vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGF)-A and (VEGF)-C. These induce LEC sprouting, migration, proliferation and lymphatic vessels growth that are all required to accommodate the increase in leukocyte migration and tissue drainage [56]. Similarly, LECs in the inflamed LN expand rapidly to lodge increased leukocyte numbers. The main VEGF producing cells in the LN are B cells in mice [57] and CD11c+ DCs in humans [58]. On the other hand, cytokines secreted by helper T cells, including IFN-ɣ [59], IL-17A [60], IL-4 and IL-13 [61], counterbalance the pro-lymphoangiogenic effects of VEGFs. Establishment of productive T cell immune response, therefore, appears to provide an auto-inhibitory loop that restricts further lymphoangiogenesis and eventually leads to lymph vessel regression during inflammation resolution. Different aspects of lymphoangiogenesis have been reviewed in detail by others in this issue of Current Opinions in Immunology. DCs regulate lymphatic vessel integrity

Recent reports indicate that, due to the inherent permeability of lymphatic vessels, soluble antigens and other lymph-borne proteins extravasate into the surrounding adipose tissue where they are taken up by macrophages and DCs [62]. It has been shown that the basal integrity Current Opinion in Immunology 2018, 53:173–179

Conclusions Lymphatic vessels not only provide the avenues for immune cell re-circulation, but also actively contribute to shape and regulate immune responses. LECs coordinate DC and T cell interaction, activate or suppress immunity and promote immune cell survival. Vice versa, immune cells are important players in regulating collecting lymph vessel integrity and lymphatic vessel density in LN. These central features bring lymph vessels from being seen as “simple conduits” to attractive target structures for the treatment of chronic inflammatory diseases. Further advances in immune-imaging, providing improved intravital imaging tools as well as transgenic mice expressing photo-convertible proteins, will help to increase our understanding of cellular and molecular events that regulate immune cell re-circulation between blood, tissue and lymphoid organs. Moreover, a closer examination of the diversity of LECs using new genomic approaches will also provide better understanding of their origin and function. In sum, we are just starting to understand the complexity of how and why LECs and immune cells interact with each other and how this can be exploited to interfere with undesired immune responses and dysfunctional lymphatics. www.sciencedirect.com

Cross talks between immune and lymphatic endothelial cells Permanyer, Bonjak and Fo¨rster 177

Conflict of interest statement Nothing declared.

Acknowledgements We regret that we not always could adequately cite the work of our colleagues due to space limitations. We would like to thank Swantje Hammerschmidt and Gu¨nter Bernhardt for critical reading of the manuscript. The work of R.F. is supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [grant numbers SFB900-B1, SFB738-B5, KFO250, FO334/5-1], the European Research Council (ERC) [advanced grant number 322645], and the Government of Lower Saxony [N-RENNT, BioFabrication].

References and recommended reading Papers of particular interest, published within the period of review, have been highlighted as  of special interest  of outstanding interest 1.

Neeland MR, Meeusen ENT, de Veer MJ: Afferent lymphatic cannulation as a model system to study innate immune responses to infection and vaccination. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 2014, 158:86-97.

2.

Maisel K, Sasso MS, Potin L, Swartz MA: Exploiting lymphatic vessels for immunomodulation: rationale, opportunities, and challenges. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2017, 114:43-59.

3.

Platt AM, Randolph GJ: Cellular composition of lymph. In Immunology of the Lymphatic System. Edited by Santambrogio L. New York: Springer; 2013:53-64.

4. 

Druzd D, Matveeva O, Ince L, Harrison U, He W, Schmal C, Herzel H, Tsang AH, Kawakami N, Leliavski A et al.: Lymphocyte circadian clocks control lymph node trafficking and adaptive immune responses. Immunity 2017, 46:120-132. See annotation to Ref. [5].

5. 

Suzuki K, Hayano Y, Nakai A, Furuta F, Noda M: Adrenergic control of the adaptive immune response by diurnal lymphocyte recirculation through lymph nodes. J Exp Med 2016, 213:2567-2574. Together with [4], this study demonstrates circadian control of lymphocyte migration through lymph and blood.

6.

Randolph GJ, Ivanov S, Zinselmeyer BH, Scallan JP: The lymphatic system: integral roles in immunity. Annu Rev Immunol 2017, 35:31-52.

7.

Worbs T, Hammerschmidt SI, Fo¨rster R: Dendritic cell migration in health and disease. Nat Rev Immunol 2017, 17:30-48.

8.

Fo¨rster R, Braun A, Worbs T: Lymph node homing of T cells and dendritic cells via afferent lymphatics. Trends Immunol 2012, 33:271-280.

9.

Weber M, Hauschild R, Schwarz J, Moussion C, de Vries I, Legler DF, Luther SA, Bollenbach T, Sixt M: Interstitial dendritic cell guidance by haptotactic chemokine gradients. Science (80-) 2013, 339:328-332.

10. Tal O, Lim HY, Gurevich I, Milo I, Shipony Z, Ng LG, Angeli V, Shakhar G: DC mobilization from the skin requires docking to immobilized CCL21 on lymphatic endothelium and intralymphatic crawling. J Exp Med 2011, 208:2141-2153. 11. Vaahtomeri K, Brown M, Hauschild R, De Vries I, Leithner AF, Mehling M, Kaufmann WA, Sixt M: Locally triggered release of the chemokine CCL21 promotes dendritic cell transmigration across lymphatic endothelia. Cell Rep 2017, 19:902-909.

14. Bryce SA, Wilson RAM, Tiplady EM, Asquith DL, Bromley SK, Luster AD, Graham GJ, Nibbs RJB: ACKR4 on stromal cells scavenges CCL19 to enable CCR7-dependent trafficking of APCs from inflamed skin to lymph nodes. J Immunol 2016, 196:3341-3353. 15. Acton SE, Astarita JL, Malhotra D, Lukacs-Kornek V, Franz B, Hess PR, Jakus Z, Kuligowski M, Fletcher AL, Elpek KG et al.: Podoplanin-rich stromal networks induce dendritic cell motility via activation of the C-type lectin receptor CLEC-2. Immunity 2012, 37:276-289. 16. Takamatsu H, Takegahara N, Nakagawa Y, Tomura M, Taniguchi M, Friedel RH, Rayburn H, Tessier-Lavigne M, Yoshida Y, Okuno T et al.: Semaphorins guide the entry of dendritic cells into the lymphatics by activating myosin II. Nat Immunol 2010, 11:594-600. 17. Thiemann S, Man JH, Chang MH, Lee B, Baum LG: Galectin-1 regulates tissue exit of specific dendritic cell populations. J Biol Chem 2015, 290:22662-22667. 18. Rathinasamy A, Czeloth N, Pabst O, Fo¨rster R, Bernhardt G: The origin and maturity of dendritic cells determine the pattern of sphingosine 1-phosphate receptors expressed and required for efficient migration. J Immunol 2010, 185:4072-4081. 19. Johnson LA, Banerji S, Lawrance W, Gileadi U, Prota G, Holder KA,  Roshorm YM, Hanke T, Cerundolo V, Gale NW et al.: Dendritic cells enter lymph vessels by hyaluronan-mediated docking to the endothelial receptor LYVE-1. Nat Immunol 2017, 18:762770. This elegant study demonstrated that DCs use hyaluronan for binding to LYVE-1 expressed on LECs to enter lymph vessels in the skin. 20. Russo E, Teijeira A, Vaahtomeri K, Willrodt A-H, Bloch JS, Nitschke´ M, Santambrogio L, Kerjaschki D, Sixt M, Halin C: Intralymphatic CCL21 promotes tissue egress of dendritic cells through afferent lymphatic vessels. Cell Rep 2016, 14:1723-1734. 21. Teijeira A, Hunter MC, Russo E, Proulx ST, Frei T, Debes GF, Coles M, Melero I, Detmar M, Rouzaut A et al.: T cell migration  from inflamed skin to draining lymph nodes requires intralymphatic crawling supported by ICAM-1/LFA-1 interactions. Cell Rep 2017, 18:857-865. This study demonstrates that T cells use ICAM-1/LFA-1 interactions to migrate through the lymph vessels on their way from inflamed skin to the draining lymph node. 22. Gebhardt T, Whitney PG, Zaid A, Mackay LK, Brooks AG, Heath WR, Carbone FR, Mueller SN: Different patterns of peripheral migration by memory CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. Nature 2011, 477:216-219. 23. Schenkel JM, Masopust D: Tissue-resident memory T cells. Immunity 2014, 41:886-897. 24. Rosato PC, Beura LK, Masopust D: Tissue resident memory T cells and viral immunity. Curr Opin Virol 2017, 22:44-50. 25. Debes GF, Arnold CN, Young AJ, Krautwald S, Lipp M, Hay JB, Butcher EC: Chemokine receptor CCR7 required for T lymphocyte exit from peripheral tissues. Nat Immunol 2005, 6:889-894. 26. Bromley SK, Thomas SY, Luster AD: Chemokine receptor CCR7 guides T cell exit from peripheral tissues and entry into afferent lymphatics. Nat Immunol 2005, 6:895-901. 27. Ledgerwood LG, Lal G, Zhang N, Garin A, Esses SJ, Ginhoux F, Merad M, Peche H, Lira SA, Ding Y et al.: The sphingosine 1phosphate receptor 1 causes tissue retention by inhibiting the entry of peripheral tissue T lymphocytes into afferent lymphatics. Nat Immunol 2008, 9:42-53.

12. Pflicke H, Sixt M: Preformed portals facilitate dendritic cell entry into afferent lymphatic vessels. J Exp Med 2009, 206:2925-2935.

28. Marttila-Ichihara F, Turja R, Miiluniemi M, Karikoski M, Maksimow M, Niemela¨ J, Martinez-Pomares L, Salmi M, Jalkanen S: Macrophage mannose receptor on lymphatics controls cell trafficking. Blood 2008, 112:64-72.

13. McKimmie CS, Singh MD, Hewit K, Lopez-Franco O, Le Brocq M, Rose-John S, Lee KM, Baker AH, Wheat R, Blackbourn DJ et al.: An analysis of the function and expression of D6 on lymphatic endothelial cells. Blood 2013, 121:3768-3777.

29. Karikoski M, Irjala H, Maksimow M, Miiluniemi M, Granfors K, Hernesniemi S, Elima K, Moldenhauer G, Schledzewski K, Kzhyshkowska J et al.: Clever-1/Stabilin-1 regulates lymphocyte migration within lymphatics and leukocyte

www.sciencedirect.com

Current Opinion in Immunology 2018, 53:173–179

178 Lymphangiogenesis: heterogeneity and function

entrance to sites of inflammation. Eur J Immunol 2009, 39:34773487. 30. Brinkman CC, Iwami D, Hritzo MK, Xiong Y, Ahmad S, Simon T, Hippen KL, Blazar BR, Bromberg JS: Treg engage lymphotoxin  beta receptor for afferent lymphatic transendothelial migration. Nat Commun 2016, 7:12021. The results of this study indicate that regulatory T cells, but not conventional T cells, use lymphotoxin to modulate cytoskelet and membrane structure of LECs and facilitate their migration through the lymphatics. 31. Teijeira A, Rouzaut A, Melero I: Initial afferent lymphatic vessels controlling outbound leukocyte traffic from skin to lymph nodes. Front Immunol 2013, 4:433. 32. Grigorova IL, Panteleev M, Cyster JG: Lymph node cortical sinus organization and relationship to lymphocyte egress dynamics and antigen exposure. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010, 107:20447-20452. 33. Cohen JN, Tewalt EF, Rouhani SJ, Buonomo EL, Bruce AN, Xu X, Bekiranov S, Fu Y-X, Engelhard VH: Tolerogenic properties of lymphatic endothelial cells are controlled by the lymph node microenvironment. PLOS ONE 2014, 9e87740. 34. Park SM, Angel CE, McIntosh JD, Mansell CJ, Mansell CM, Chen C-JJ, Cebon J, Dunbar PR: Mapping the distinctive populations of lymphatic endothelial cells in different zones of human lymph nodes. PLOS ONE 2014, 9e94781. 35. Iftakhar-E-Khuda I, Fair-Ma¨kela¨ R, Kukkonen-Macchi A, Elima K, Karikoski M, Rantakari P, Miyasaka M, Salmi M, Jalkanen S: Gene expression profiling of different arms of lymphatic vasculature identifies candidates for manipulation of cell traffic. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2016, 113:10643-10648. Using laser capture microdissection, this study indicated differences in gene expression and function of LECs located in subcapsular sinus and medullary sinus of the LN. 36. Ulvmar MH, Werth K, Braun A, Kelay P, Hub E, Eller K, Chan L, Lucas B, Novitzky-Basso I, Nakamura K et al.: The atypical chemokine receptor CCRL1 shapes functional CCL21 gradients in lymph nodes. Nat Immunol 2014, 15:623-630. 37. Braun A, Worbs T, Moschovakis GL, Halle S, Hoffmann K, Bo¨lter J, Mu¨nk A, Fo¨rster R: Afferent lymph–derived T cells and DCs use different chemokine receptor CCR7–dependent routes for entry into the lymph node and intranodal migration. Nat Immunol 2011, 12:879-887. 38. Rantakari P, Auvinen K, Ja¨ppinen N, Kapraali M, Valtonen J, Karikoski M, Gerke H, Iftakhar-E-Khuda I, Keuschnigg J, Umemoto E et al.: The endothelial protein PLVAP in lymphatics controls the entry of lymphocytes and antigens into lymph nodes. Nat Immunol 2015, 16:386-396. 39. Pham THM, Okada T, Matloubian M, Lo CG, Cyster JG: S1P1 receptor signaling overrides retention mediated by G alpha icoupled receptors to promote T cell egress. Immunity 2008, 28:122-133. 40. Mendoza A, Fang V, Chen C, Serasinghe M, Verma A, Muller J,  Chaluvadi VS, Dustin ML, Hla T, Elemento O et al.: Lymphatic endothelial S1P promotes mitochondrial function and survival in naive T cells. Nature 2017, 546:158-161. This study shows that S1P, apart for its role in lymphocyte exit from the LN, is also crucial for survival of naı¨ve T cells during their migration in lymphatics. 41. Hara T, Shitara S, Imai K, Miyachi H, Kitano S, Yao H, Tani-ichi S, Ikuta K: Identification of IL-7-producing cells in primary and secondary lymphoid organs using IL-7-GFP knock-in mice. J Immunol 2012, 189:1577-1584. 42. Iolyeva M, Aebischer D, Proulx ST, Willrodt AH, Ecoiffier T, Ha¨ner S, Bouchaud G, Krieg C, Onder L, Ludewig B et al.: Interleukin-7 is produced by afferent lymphatic vessels and supports lymphatic drainage. Blood 2013, 122:2271-2281. 43. Hunter MC, Teijeira A, Halin C: T Cell trafficking through lymphatic vessels. Front Immunol 2016, 7:613. 44. Yeo KP, Angeli V: Bidirectional crosstalk between lymphatic endothelial cell and T cell and its implications in tumor immunity. Front Immunol 2017, 8:1-11. Current Opinion in Immunology 2018, 53:173–179

45. Cohen JN, Guidi CJ, Tewalt EF, Qiao H, Rouhani SJ, Ruddell A, Farr AG, Tung KS, Engelhard VH: Lymph node-resident lymphatic endothelial cells mediate peripheral tolerance via Aire-independent direct antigen presentation. J Exp Med 2010, 207:681-688. 46. Tewalt EF, Cohen JN, Rouhani SJ, Guidi CJ, Qiao H, Fahl SP, Conaway MR, Bender TP, Tung KS, Vella AT et al.: Lymphatic endothelial cells induce tolerance via PD-L1 and lack of costimulation leading to high-level PD-1 expression on CD8 T cells. Blood 2012, 120:4772-4782. 47. Rouhani SJ, Eccles JD, Riccardi P, Peske JD, Tewalt EF, Cohen JN, Liblau R, Ma¨kinen T, Engelhard VH: Roles of lymphatic endothelial cells expressing peripheral tissue antigens in CD4 T-cell tolerance induction. Nat Commun 2015, 6:6771. 48. Hirosue S, Vokali E, Raghavan VR, Rincon-Restrepo M, Lund AW, Corthe´sy-Henrioud P, Capotosti F, Halin Winter C, Hugues S, Swartz MA: Steady-state antigen scavenging, crosspresentation, and CD8+ T cell priming: a new role for lymphatic endothelial cells. J Immunol 2014, 192:5002-5011. 49. Schildberg FA, Sharpe AH, Turley SJ: Hepatic immune regulation by stromal cells. Curr Opin Immunol 2015, 32:1-6. 50. Tamburini BA, Burchill MA, Kedl RM: Antigen capture and archiving by lymphatic endothelial cells following vaccination or viral infection. Nat Commun 2014, 5:3989. 51. Kedl RM, Lindsay RS, Finlon JM, Lucas ED, Friedman RS,  Tamburini BAJ: Migratory dendritic cells acquire and present lymphatic endothelial cell-archived antigens during lymph node contraction. Nat Commun 2017, 8:2034. The results of this study indicate that LECs handle antigens from viral infection or vaccination to migratory DCs for cross-presentation to circulating T cells. 52. Ugur M, Schulz O, Menon MB, Krueger A, Pabst O: Resident CD4 + T cells accumulate in lymphoid organs after prolonged antigen exposure. Nat Commun 2014, 5:4821. 53. No¨rder M, Gutierrez MG, Zicari S, Cervi E, Caruso A, Guzma´n CA: Lymph node-derived lymphatic endothelial cells express functional costimulatory molecules and impair dendritic cellinduced allogenic T-cell proliferation. FASEB J 2012, 26:28352846. 54. Lukacs-Kornek V, Malhotra D, Fletcher AL, Acton SE, Elpek KG, Tayalia P, Collier A, Turley SJ: Regulated release of nitric oxide by nonhematopoietic stroma controls expansion of the activated T cell pool in lymph nodes. Nat Immunol 2011, 12:1096-1104. 55. Podgrabinska S, Kamalu O, Mayer L, Shimaoka M, Snoeck H, Randolph GJ, Skobe M: Inflamed lymphatic endothelium suppresses dendritic cell maturation and function via Mac-1/ ICAM-1-dependent mechanism. J Immunol 2009, 183:17671779. 56. Kim H, Kataru RP, Koh GY: Inflammation-associated lymphangiogenesis: a double-edged sword? J Clin Invest 2014, 124:936-942. 57. Dubey LK, Karempudi P, Luther SA, Ludewig B, Harris NL: Interactions between fibroblastic reticular cells and B cells promote mesenteric lymph node lymphangiogenesis. Nat Commun 2017, 8:367. 58. Salvi V, Vermi W, Gianello V, Lonardi S, Gagliostro V, Naldini A, Sozzani S, Bosisio D: Dendritic cell-derived VEGF-A plays a role in inflammatory angiogenesis of human secondary lymphoid organs and is driven by the coordinated activation of multiple transcription factors. Oncotarget 2016, 7:39256-39269. 59. Kataru RP, Kim H, Jang C, Choi DK, Koh BI, Kim M, Gollamudi S, Kim Y-K, Lee S-H, Koh GY: T lymphocytes negatively regulate lymph node lymphatic vessel formation. Immunity 2011, 34:96107. 60. Park HJ, Yuk CM, Shin K, S-H Lee: Interleukin-17A negatively regulates lymphangiogenesis in T helper 17 cell-mediated inflammation. Mucosal Immunol 2017 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ mi.2017.76. www.sciencedirect.com

Cross talks between immune and lymphatic endothelial cells Permanyer, Bonjak and Fo¨rster 179

61. Shin K, Kataru RP, Park HJ, Kwon B-I, Kim TW, Hong YK, Lee S-H: TH2 cells and their cytokines regulate formation and function of lymphatic vessels. Nat Commun 2015, 6:6196. 62. Kuan EL, Ivanov S, Bridenbaugh EA, Victora G, Wang W,  Childs EW, Platt AM, Jakubzick CV, Mason RJ, Gashev AA et al.: Collecting lymphatic vessel permeability facilitates adipose tissue inflammation and distribution of antigen to lymph nodehoming adipose tissue dendritic cells. J Immunol 2015, 194:5200-5210. The results of this study indicate that the leakiness of collecting lymph vessels is controlled by CCR7 expression on IFN regulatory factor 4positive (IRF4+) dendritic cells. 63. Ivanov S, Scallan JP, Kim K-W, Werth K, Johnson MW, Saunders BT, Wang PL, Kuan EL, Straub AC, Ouhachi M et al.: CCR7 and IRF4-dependent dendritic cells regulate lymphatic collecting vessel permeability. J Clin Invest 2016, 126:15811591.

www.sciencedirect.com

64. Han S-J, Glatman Zaretsky A, Andrade-Oliveira V, Collins N, Dzutsev A, Shaik J, Morais da Fonseca D, Harrison OJ, Tamoutounour S, Byrd AL et al.: White adipose tissue is a reservoir for memory T Cells and promotes protective memory responses to infection. Immunity 2017, 47:1154-1168.e6. 65. Fonseca DMDa, Hand TW, Han S-J, Gerner MY, Glatman Zaretsky A, Byrd AL, Harrison OJ, Ortiz AM, Quinones M, Trinchieri G et al.: Microbiota-dependent sequelae of acute infection compromise tissue-specific immunity. Cell 2015, 163:354-366. 66. Randolph GJ, Bala S, Rahier J-F, Johnson MW, Wang PL, Nalbantoglu I, Dubuquoy L, Chau A, Pariente B, Kartheuser A et al.: Lymphoid aggregates remodel lymphatic collecting vessels that serve mesenteric lymph nodes in Crohn disease. Am J Pathol 2016, 186:3066-3073.

Current Opinion in Immunology 2018, 53:173–179