Lw4o4039/92 s5.00+.00 PCr8PmOnk.WLtd
TenahedronLews.Vol. 33,No.27.p~.3855-3858.1992 PrintedinGren~ Britain
DEPROTECTION
OF BENEALDEHYDE
DIACLTATES
BY CERIC
AMMONIUM
NITRATE
COATED
Philippe
Cotelle*
and Jean-Pierre
ON SILICA
Catteau
Laboratoire de Chimie Organique Physique associ6 au CNRS Universit& des Sciences et Technologies de Lille 59655 Villeneuve d'Ascq
Benzaldehyde diacetates ABSTRKT: corresponding benzaldehydes using on sibica in dichloromethane.
F'or decades I Nitra?.e organic to
(CAN)
chemistryI.
has
also
For
of
has
used
been
protected diacetate
ideal
been
nitration
oxidising
shown the
and
reagent
because
employed
to
and
selectively converted to the Ammonium Nitrate (CAN) coated
properties extremely
of
benzylic
of the on
deprotection
of
Ammonium
in
synthetic
dimethyl
oxidation3-E,
mild
gel
of
ethers CAN
conditions
silica
oxidation
Ceric
useful
of hydroquinone
for
adsorbed
arenes6
effect
has
involved.
for
oxidative
hydroquinones7.
CAN
have
been
ketones
which
or
1,3-dithianes'. The benzaldehyde has been successfully used by Tomita and ~011,'
protection reaction.
be
oxidation
1,3-dithiolanes
as
to
quinonesl
polynuclear
but has not yet become acylation
strong
been
thl; corresponding
proveri to be an
It
the
have
were Ceric
FRANCE
a useful
method
due to the unselectivity
of the
Recently,
we have used this protection to modify selectively the orientation of the nitration of 2,5dimetboxybenzaldehydelO. In this paper, we wish to report the use of CAN cn silica7 for the selective deprotection of benzaldehyde diacetstes. We
reacted
benzaldehydes
several
in acetic
dichloromethanell
benzaldehyde anhydride
diacetates
l(prepared
quantitativelyl')
(Table, scheme 1).
3855
with
from
cAN/Si02
the in
3856
R’
R’ CHO
Scheme 1 occurs
beprotection diacetates protection,
lb
and
which
diacetoxybenzene
Ic
nitroh,ydroquinone
without
was
reacts and
selectively previously
with
CAN
has
of
4-acetoxybenzaldehyde the
reported
in
acetate
Chawlal'
methanol/acetic
acid
to
(1,4give
1,4_Diacetoxybenzene does not (All attempts to cleave aromatic and
failed). These
differences
because of the drastic conditions used by Chawla. nitration Whereas for dimethoxybenzenes13, dichlcromethane
phenolic
by
hydroquinone).
react in the presence of CAN/SiO2 alipha,tic acetates
cleavage
on
are
not unexpected
with
CAN/Si02
occurred giving good yields of mononitrated
in
compounds,
no nitrated compound was obtained for la. la showed
no sign of reaction
with silica
in methylene
chloride
and w:*s thus completely recovered from the reaction mixture, but reaction of la with CAN in an acetonitrile/water solution afforded the benzoquinone-1,4-aldehyde
diacetate'
2 (scheme 2) attempts to deprotect 2 proved to be futile).
la
Scheme 2
in
96%
yield
(all
3857
Th+ mixture
addition
of
lml
of
water
(CAN/SiO2 in methylene
dimethoxybenzaldehyde Th+se results
or methanol
to
the
deprotection
chloride) gave a mixture
of 2 and 2,5-
(10/90) from la (90% yield).
show that for deprotection it is necessary to coat onto silica. When oxidative demethylation can
Ceric AriunoniumNitrate the reaction
occur,
must
be carried
out in the
absence
of
a protic
solvent to avoid the formation of benzoquinone. Table: oeprotection
of benzaldehyde diacetates
1 and benzoquinone-1,4-
aldehydcr!diacetate 2 by cAN/Sio2 RX
R2
R3
R4
la14
0CH3
H
0CH3
H
92
lb15
H
0COCH3
H
H
98
lC15 ld"
H
OCOCH3
OCH3
H
0CH3
H
90 94
1918
OCH3
NO2 H
0CH3 OCH3
NO2
95
Substra*:.e
Yield(%)"
Ob
2 a. Yieltls of pure compounds. b. 2 wa::.recovered To proves
sum
up,
useful
diacetayes
in 95% yield. we
have
for
the
found
that
selective
to give benzaldehydes.
CAN/Si02
deprotection
Rev.,
1992,
Synthesis, 92,
aprotic of
in
acidic16
REFERENCES AND NOTES 1973, 347-354. See also G.A.
solvent
benzaldehyde
The aryl acetate function
not lb and react whereas lo) does conditions, it is readily cleaved.
1. T.L. HO,
in an
or
(compounds alkaline17
MOLANDER,
Chem.
29-68
2. P. JACOB, P.S. CALLERY, A.T. SHULGIN, N. CASTAGNOLI,
J. Org. Chem.,
1976, 4.1. , 3627-3629 3. s. DTNCTURK,
J.H. RIDD, J. Chem.
Sot.
Perkin
Trans.
2,
1982, 961-
964 4. K. Ii;OBE, N. TAKEDA, K. MOHRI, Y. TSUDA, Chem.
Pharm.
Bull ., 1989,
37, 339(1-3392 5. W.S. TRAHANOVSKY,
L.B. YOUNG, J. Org. Chem., 1966, 31, 2033-2035 6. H.M. CHAWLA, R.S. MITTAL, Synthesis, 1985, 70-72 7. A. FISCHER, G.N. HENDERSON, Synthesis, 1995, 641-643
3858
8. T,L, Ho, H.C. HO, C.H. WONG, J. Chem. Sot.,
Chem.
Commun.,
1972,
INUBUSHI,
Chem.
791 9. M. TOMITA, T. KIKUCHI, K. BESSHO, Pharm. Bull., 1963, 11, 1484-1490
HORI,
T.
Y.
10. E. COTELLE, J.P. CATTEAU, Synth. Commun., in press 11. '!'ypicalprocedure: Substituted benzaldehyde diacetate in
dichloromethane
(15ml)
is
(6.94g, 2.lmmol of Ce(IV)). residue is filtered. The Evaprration Addition
of
evapcration
of
solvent hexane
gives
added
The
washed
from
the
with
mixture
stirring
to
is stirred
with combined
(1, lmmol)
the
for
dichloromethane filtrates
the acetic (to remove benzaldehyde which is found
and
(2*15ml).
gives
(2*15ml)
substituted
CAN/SiO2
15 min an
oil.
acid) and to be pure
by lP-N.M.R. 12. Y. CHAUDHURI, H.M. CHAWLA, curr. Sci., 1986, 55, 852-853 13.
The
nitration
of
dimethoxyphenyl
derivatives
will
be
published
soon. 14. l'.R. PREUSS, R. MENZEL, Arch. Pharm., 1958, 291, 377-380; C.A. 53, 5175 (1959) 15. All new compounds give satisfactory spectroscopic data. 16. (:. BiiCHI, S.M. WEINREB, J. Am. Chem. Sot., 1971, 93, 746-752 17. E. HASLAM, G.K. MAKINSON, M.O. NAUMANN, J. CUNNINGHAM, J. Chem. sot. 1964, 2137-2146
(ReceivedinFrance 12 March 1992)