Accepted Manuscript Description of a juvenile titanosaurian dinosaur from the Upper Cretaceous of Brazil Julian C.G. Silva Junior, Agustín G. Martinelli, Luiz C.B. Ribeiro, Thiago S. Marinho PII:
S0195-6671(16)30391-3
DOI:
10.1016/j.cretres.2017.03.029
Reference:
YCRES 3575
To appear in:
Cretaceous Research
Received Date: 15 December 2016 Revised Date:
27 March 2017
Accepted Date: 30 March 2017
Please cite this article as: Silva Junior, J.C.G., Martinelli, A.G., Ribeiro, L.C.B., Marinho, T.S., Description of a juvenile titanosaurian dinosaur from the Upper Cretaceous of Brazil, Cretaceous Research (2017), doi: 10.1016/j.cretres.2017.03.029. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1
Description of a juvenile titanosaurian dinosaur from the Upper
2
Cretaceous of Brazil
3 Julian C. G. Silva Junior1,4*, Agustín G. Martinelli4,3, Luiz C. B. Ribeiro4, Thiago S. Marinho2,4
6
1
7
Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Av. Bandeirantes, 3900, 14040-901, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil
8
2
9
Departamento de Ciências Biológicas, Avenida Doutor Randolfo Borges Júnior, 38064-200, Uberaba,
RI PT
4 5
Laboratório de Paleontologia de Ribeirão Preto, Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão
SC
Instituto de Ciências Exatas, Naturais e Educação, Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro,
10
Minas Gerais, Brazil.
11
3
12
Grande do Sul, Ave. Bento Gonçalves 9500, Agronomia, 91540–000, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul,
13
Brazil.
14
4
15
Peirópolis, Estanislau Collenghi 194, 38039-755, Peirópolis, Uberaba, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
M AN U
Departamento de Paleontologia e Estratigrafia, Instituto de Geociências, Universidade Federal do Rio
Centro de Pesquisas Paleontológicas “Llwelyn Ivor Price”, Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro,
17 18
TE D
16
* Corresponding author:
[email protected]
Abstract: We describe a juvenile specimen of a titanosaurian sauropod dinosaur
20
consisting of two dorsal and three caudal vertebral centra, an ilium fragment, and an ischium
21
unearthed in 1991 from Site Km 153.5 of highway BR-050 in the Serra da Galga region,
22
municipality of Uberaba, state of Minas Gerais, Brazil. The outcrop at the site is assigned to the
23
Serra da Galga Member of the Marília Formation (Bauru Basin: Bauru Group; Upper
24
Cretaceous: Maastrichtian). Although the material is very incomplete, features such as strongly
25
procoelous caudal centra suggest an affinity with the titanosaurian clade Lithostrotia. The
26
extensive vertebral pneumaticity with deep pleurocoels and well-developed camerae supports
27
the hypothesis that, in titanosaurs, the air sac system was already present and fully developed
28
even at early ontogenetic stages.
29
AC C
EP
19
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 30 31
Keywords: Sauropoda, Titanosauria, juvenile, Marília Formation, Upper Cretaceous, ontogeny, pneumaticity
32 33
1. Introduction
RI PT
34
Titanosaurs represent the last great radiation of sauropod dinosaurs, with a
36
globally distributed body-fossil record dating back to at least the late Early Cretaceous
37
(D’emic, 2012). They are easily differentiated from other sauropods by a characteristic
38
suite of features such as anterior and middle caudal vertebrae with a ventral longitudinal
39
hollow (convergent in diplodocids), a platelike ischium with no emargination distal to
40
pubic peduncle, six or seven sacral vertebraeand reduction of the articular surfaces for
41
the manual phalanges on the metacarpals (e.g., Salgado et al., 1997; Wilson and Sereno,
42
1998; Wilson, 2002; Wilson, 2006a). In the Cretaceous fossil record of Brazil
43
titanosaurs represent the dinosaur clade with the highest taxonomic abundance (Kellner,
44
1999; Novas, 2009; Bittencout and Langer, 2011), with ten species formally described
45
to date. Of these, Baurutitan britoi Kellner, Campos, and Trotta 2005, Trigonosaurus
46
pricei Campos, Kellner, Bertini and Santucci 2005, and Uberabatitan ribeiroi Salgado
47
and Carvalho 2008 have been found in the region of Uberaba, in the state of Minas
48
Gerais, in Upper Cretaceous rocks belonging to the Bauru Group of the Bauru Basin.
M AN U
TE D
EP
AC C
49
SC
35
Fossils of juvenile sauropod individuals are rare, possibly because their small
50
size made them more susceptible to taphonomic processes such as weathering,
51
scavenging, and transport (Behrensmeyer et al., 1979; Carpenter and McIntosh, 1994).
52
Although most juvenile sauropod specimens consist of fragmentary material (Peterson
53
and Gilmore, 1902; Britt and Naylor, 1994; Martin, 1994; Foster, 2005; Candeiro et al.,
54
2011), there are some notable
55
titanosauriform described by Schwarz et al. (2007) and Carballido et al. (2012), a
exceptions, such as the enigmatic probable
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT juvenile of the titanosaur Alamosaurus sanjuanensis Gilmore, 1922 (Lehman and
57
Coulson, 2002), some juvenile remains of Europasaurus holgeri Sander, Mateus and
58
Knötschke, 2006 (Carballido and Sander, 2014), a juvenile Rapetosaurus krausei Curry
59
Rogers and Forster, 2001 (Curry Rogers, 2009), the recent records of a juvenile
60
specimen of Barosaurus March, 1890 (Melstrom et al., 2016), and a putative record
61
from the Lower Cretaceous of Brazil (Ghilardi et al., 2016).
RI PT
56
Here we describe a juvenile specimen of a titanosaurian sauropod dinosaur from
63
the Marilia Formation, Bauru Basin, Brazil. This is the first juvenile specimen
64
recovered from this formation and the most complete occurrence of a juvenile sauropod
65
from Brazil.
M AN U
SC
62
66 67
2. Geological Context
68
The material here was recovered from an exposure of the Serra da Galga
70
Member of the Marília Formation (Upper Cretaceous: Maastrichtian) of the Bauru
71
Group in the Bauru Basin (Fernandes and Coimbra, 1998, 2008; Dias-Brito et al., 2001;
72
Paula e Silva, 2003). The Bauru Basin covers most of the western plateau of the state of
73
São Paulo and also extends to the Triângulo Mineiro (i.e., the westernmost portion of
74
Minas Gerais state), southern Goiás state, and southeastern Mato Grosso and northern
75
Mato Grosso do Sul states (Ribeiro and Carvalho, 2009) (Fig. 1).
EP
AC C
76
TE D
69
The subsurface of the Bauru Basin is composed of basalts of the Serra Geral
77
Formation that are overlain by 300 m of sedimentary rocks that pertain to two
78
chronologically correlated units, the Caiuá Group and the Bauru Group (Fernandes and
79
Coimbra, 1998, 2008). The Caiuá Group includes the Rio Paraná, Goio Erê, and Santo
80
Anastácio formations, which are composed of thin to very thin aeolian sandstones, that
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT were deposited in a paleodesert that extended across the inner portion of the Bauru
82
Basin during the Early Cretaceous (Fernandes and Coimbra, 2008). The Bauru Group is
83
composed of the Vale do Rio do Peixe, Araçatuba, Presidente Prudente, São José do Rio
84
Preto, Uberaba and Marília formations (sensu Fernandes, 2004). However, some
85
authors disagree with this stratigraphic proposal. For example, Batezelli (2015) divided
86
the Bauru Group into the Araçatuba, Uberaba, Adamantina, and Marília formations
87
(Soares et al., 1980), with the latter including the Vale do Rio do Peixe, São José do Rio
88
Preto and Presidente Prudente formations of Fernandes (2004).
SC
RI PT
81
The Marília Formation consists of fining-upward cycles, including matrix-
90
supported conglomerates with intra- and extraformational clasts, fine to very coarse
91
sandstones, and rare mudstones (Menegazzo et al., 2016). The formation is divided into
92
three members: the Serra da Galga, Ponte Alta, and Echaporã members, with the former
93
cropping out exclusively in the Uberaba region. The Serra da Galga Member stands out
94
as one of the most important paleontological units in the entire Bauru Group, having
95
produced approximately 15 formally described fossil vertebrate taxa that collectively
96
include fishes, frogs, lizards, turtles, crocodyliforms, and dinosaurs (sauropods and
97
theropods, the latter including birds) (see Martinelli and Teixeira, 2015, and references
98
therein). The Serra da Galga Member has also yielded remains of invertebrates (e.g.,
99
ostracods, gastropods, bivalves) and charophytes.
101 102 103 104
TE D
EP
AC C
100
M AN U
89
Figure 1 here. 1.5 column
Fig. 1. Geological map of the Bauru Basin in Brazil. Modified from Fernandes and Coimbra (1996).
105 106 107
3. Materials and Methods
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 108
The specimens were recovered in 1991 from a site about 500 m from the
109
outcrops where the type materials of Uberabatitan were found. The remains are housed
110
at the Centro de Pesquisas Paleontológicas “Llwelyn Ivor Price” (CPPLIP) of the
111
Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro (UFTM). Throughout the description of the vertebrae we employ the terminology
113
proposed by Wedel (2003) for the classification of pneumatic features, and the
114
terminology proposed by Wilson (2006b) for the anatomical structures. Anterior and
115
posterior are used in place of cranial and caudal, respectively.
SC
RI PT
112
116
Institutional abbreviations. CPPLIP: Centro de Pesquisas Paleontológicas Llwellyn
118
Ivor Price.
119 120
4. Systematic paleontology
121
SAUROPODA Marsh 1878
TE D
122 123 124
MACRONARIA Wilson and Sereno 1998
128 129 130
TITANOSAURIFORMES Salgado, Coria and Calvo 1997
AC C
127
EP
125 126
TITANOSAURIA Bonaparte and Coria 1993
Gen. et sp. Indet
131 132 133
M AN U
117
Figures: 5 figures
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 134
Referred material: The material consists of two dorsal centra (CPPLIP 0032 and
135
CPPLIP 0115), three caudal centra (CPPLIP 0031, CPPLIP 0086, and CPPLIP 0114), a
136
partial right ilium (CPPLIP 0029), and a partial right ischium (CPPLIP 0034).
137
Locality and horizon: Serra da Galga Member of the Marília Formation (Maastrichtian),
139
in the Serra da Galga region at kilometer 153.5 of the highway BR-050, in the
140
municipality of Uberaba, Minas Gerais state, Brazil.
142
SC
141
RI PT
138
4.1 Taphonomic observations
The outcrop where the specimen was found no longer exist, it was destroyed
144
during a highway expansion, so only limited information regarding the stratigraphic
145
environment could be recovered. However, it was found close to the outcrop where
146
Uberabatitan was discovered within a braided fluvial system on a conglomeratic level,
147
and the corresponding stratigraphy can be seen in Salgado and Carvalho, 2008.
TE D
M AN U
143
Fossils discovered in the Serra da Galga Member of the Marília Formation
149
mostly consist of disarticulated fragments, possibly related to strong seasonal
150
fluctuations in sedimentary cycles (Garcia et al., 1999). The high degree of abrasion,
151
including fractured and rounded surfaces, indicates that these taphonomic features were
152
generated during transport in high-energy environments (Behrensmeyer, 1975;
153
Behrensmeyer et al., 1979). This conclusion is supported by the transportability scheme
154
introduced by Voorhies (1969), who demonstrated that elements of the axial column
155
and pelvic girdle (his groups 1 and 2) display the highest potential for transport in
156
fluvial systems – a situation that potentially accounts for the taphonomic signature of,
157
e.g., the juvenile titanosaur taphocenosis.
158
AC C
EP
148
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Due to their close association in the field, corresponding size, and similar
160
preservation, the elements are considered to belong to a single titanosaurian individual.
161
The specimens are fragmentary, indicating possible prediagenetic transport, a
162
hypothesis that is reinforced by the fact that the neural arches were not found
163
associated. These are delicate structures that could have been easily destroyed or
164
disarticulated in immature animals (Martin, 1994).
165
4.2 Descriptions and Comparisons
SC
166
RI PT
159
Dorsal vertebrae: CPPLIP 0032 (Fig. 2A–E) is a well-preserved opisthocoelous
168
dorsal centrum, lacking only a small portion of its right anterior face. The lateral faces
169
are short with deep pleurocoels on both sides. The floor of the neural canal is deep and
170
strongly concave, a feature commonly observed in juvenile sauropods, in which the
171
neural canal is more conspicuously developed than in adults (Britt and Naylor, 1994). A
172
small orifice, located roughly at the anterior portion of the neural canal, was made
173
artificially during the preparation of the material. The contact surfaces with the neural
174
arch show a pattern of ridges and grooves, indicating that the neurocentral suture was
175
unfused, a typical feature of juveniles (Martin, 1994).
EP
TE D
M AN U
167
Dorsal centrum CPPLIP 0115 (Fig. 2F–J), the centrum is poorly preserved and
177
heavily eroded on its left lateral face, but the right pleurocoel is preserved, measuring 28
178
mm anteroposteriorly and 15 mm dorsoventrally. The right contact surface for the
179
neural arch is poorly preserved, as is the neural canal.
AC C
176
180
In both CPPLIP 0032 and CPPLIP 0115, the centrum is much less ventrally
181
concave than in dorsal centra of the Patagonian saltasaurine titanosaur Neuquensaurus
182
australis Lydekker, 1893 (Salgado et al., 2005). However, the new juvenile centra are
183
similar to the middle dorsal centra of Overosaurus paradasorum Coria, Filippi,
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 184
Chiappe, García, and Arcucci, 2013. In lateral view, the ventral limits of the anterior
185
condyles are slightly more pronounced than those of the posterior cotyles, but without
186
the ventral crest present in Overosaurus (Coria et al., 2013). The pleurocoels are located on the anterior-most portion of the centrum as in
188
Bonatitan reigi Martinelli and Forasiepi, 2004. CPPLIP 0032 is also similar to dorsal
189
centra of Trigonosaurus in that both pleurocoels occupy the dorsal-most portion of the
190
centrum.
RI PT
187
CPPLIP 0032 and CPPLIP 0115 differ from the dorsal centra of a juvenile
192
specimen of the diplodocid Brontosaurus parvus (Tschopp et al., 2015) with respect to
193
the ventral extension of the condyles and cotyles, which do not surpass the ventral
194
margins of the main body of the centra in the latter. Furthermore, the pleurocoels of
195
Brontosaurus are located on the posterior portion of the centrum, connected to the
196
cotyle.
M AN U
SC
191
TE D
197
Figure 2 here. 2-column
198 199
201 202
Fig. 2. Juvenile Titanosauria indet. from the Serra da Galga Member of the Marília Formation. Dorsal centrum CPPLIP 0032 in anterior (A), posterior (B), left lateral (C), right lateral (D), and dorsal (E) views. Dorsal centrum CPPLIP 0115 in anterior (F), posterior (G), left lateral (H), right lateral (I), and dorsal (J) views.
EP
200
204
AC C
203
Caudal vertebrae: CPPLIP 0031 (Fig. 3A–D) is a well-preserved procoelous
205
caudal vertebral centrum. Based on these measurements, and comparisons with the
206
other two preserved caudal centra, this centrum clearly pertained to an anterior caudal
207
vertebra. The lateral faces are short, with the posterior condyle occupying one-third of
208
the anteroposterior length of the centrum. The contact surfaces for the neural arch are
209
well defined and short, reinforcing the identification of the vertebra as an anterior
210
caudal.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT CPPLIP 0114 (Fig. 3E–F) is a very poorly preserved caudal centrum. The
212
posterior condyle is broken and the lateral faces are short. The contact surface of the
213
neural arch is not preserved and its right portion is fragmented. The neural canal is very
214
large, which may indicate that the centrum belonged to another anterior caudal vertebra,
215
but one that was positioned more posteriorly than CPPLIP 0031.
RI PT
211
CPPLIP 0086 (Fig. 3G–H) is another fragmentary caudal centrum that is similar
217
in size to CPPLIP 0114. The contact surfaces for the neural arch are poorly preserved,
218
as are both lateral sides of the centrum. The neural canal is large and well preserved. Its
219
diameter and proportions indicate that the centrum was also positioned near CPPLIP
220
0031, and therefore probably represents part of another anterior caudal.
M AN U
SC
216
The absence of the neural arches precludes the identification of the position of
222
both CPPLIP 0086 and CPPLIP 0114. However, assuming that they belong to the same
223
individual as CPPLIP 0031, it is probable that they derive from the middle section of
224
the caudal series insofar as they are not much smaller than the latter centrum. Relative
225
to the anterior centrum, which shows a strongly procoelous condition and a robust
226
condyle, the condyles and the cotyles of both mid caudal are only slightly developed.
TE D
221
230
TABLE 1. Vertebral measurements (mm). The values followed by a * represents complete structures.
AC C
228 229
EP
227
Identification
Element Maximum Maximum Maximum
Condyle
Condyle Cotyle Cotyle
Lenght
width
Height
Height
Width
Height Width
CPPLIP 0032
Dorsal
62
60
48
37
52
46*
55*
CPPLIP 0115
Dorsal
62
60
66
43
51
32
63
CPPLIP 0031
Caudal
70*
59*
50*
46*
75*
49*
90*
CPPLIP 0086
Caudal
47
43
30
34
54
35
55
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT CPPLIP 0114
Caudal
47
40
24
32
55
32
59
231 232
The caudal centra clearly differ from those of Baurutitan due primarily to the
234
absence of a pronounced rim framing the posterior condyle, the lack of a deep
235
depression in its central portion, and the absence of a ‘heart-shaped’ anterior cotyle.
236
This latter feature also differentiates the centra from those of Bonitasaura salgadoi
237
Apesteguía, 2004. The new caudals also differ from those of Trigonosaurus in having
238
lateral and ventral margins that are less concave and bounded by the condyle. Despite
239
the fact that the transverse processes are not fully preserved in CPPLIP 0031, they are
240
similar to those of Neuquensaurus in being positioned anteriorly on the centrum.
M AN U
SC
RI PT
233
241 242 243
247 248 249 250 251 252
TE D
246
Fig. 3. Juvenile Titanosauria indet. from the Serra da Galga Member of the Marília Formation. Caudal centrum CPPLIP 0031 in right lateral (A), left lateral (B), dorsal (C), and ventral (D) views. Caudal centrum CPPLIP 0114 in ventral (E) and dorsal (F) views. Caudal centrum CPPLIP 0086 in ventral (G) and dorsal (H) views.
EP
245
Figure 3 here. 2-column
AC C
244
Ilium: CPPLIP 0034 (Fig. 4A–B) is a fragment of a right ilium. It measures 134
253
mm in maximum length and 84 mm in preserved height. The proximal portion of the
254
pubic peduncle is preserved; it is robust and anteroposteriorly flattened. A small portion
255
of the preacetabular process is also present as a thin lamina.
256
Ischium: CPPLIP 0029 (Fig. 4C–D) is an almost complete right ischium that
257
measures 208 mm in greatest length and 120 mm in preserved height. It has a semilunar
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 258
shape in medial and lateral views. The iliac peduncle is short and its anterior face is
259
concave where it forms part of the acetabulum. The pubic peduncle is not preserved.
260 261
TABLE 2. Pelvic girdle measurements (mm)
Element
Preserved Length
CPPLIP 0034
Ilium
134
CPPLIP 0029
Ischium
208
Preserved Height 84
120
SC
Identification
RI PT
262
263
The ilium is too fragmented for comparisons, However the ischium, although
265
heavily abraded, is a narrow, lamina-like structure, similar in appearance to those of
266
Neuquensaurus and Saltasaurus loricatus Bonaparte and Powell, 1980. The iliac
267
peduncle appears to have been relatively gracile and less robust than in Rapetsaurus or
268
Nequensaurus.
M AN U
264
TE D
269 270
273 274 275 276 277
Fig. 4. Juvenile Titanosauria indet. from the Serra da Galga Member of the Marília Formation. Right lium CPPLIP 0034 in lateral (A) and medial (B) views. Right ischium CPPLIP 0029 in medial (C) and lateral (D) views.
EP
272
Figure 4 here. 2-column
AC C
271
4.3 Pneumaticity
Postcranial pneumaticity in sauropod dinosaurs has been the subject of much
278
investigation in recent years (Cerda et al., 2012; Wedel and Taylor, 2013).
279
Pneumatization of the axial skeleton would have dramatically reduced its total mass and
280
undoubtedly helped sauropods reach their massive body sizes (Wedel, 2009). Vertebral
281
laminae (the series of thin, bony struts connecting the major vertebral landmarks) are
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 282
thus best conceived of as a correlate of axial pneumaticity in saurischians, bounding
283
negative space filled by pneumatic diverticula (Wilson, 1999). Wedel (2003a) introduced a classificatory scheme in order to standardize the
285
defining characteristics of pneumaticity in sauropod vertebrae. Among these, two types
286
of pneumaticity were described in titanosaurs: (1) camellate pneumaticity, which is
287
characterized by the presence of camellae with generally small, angular cavities bearing
288
irregular margins; and (2) camerate pneumaticity, which is characterized by the
289
presence of camerae with generally larger, rounded cavities having regular margins
290
(sensu Wedel, 2003a).
SC
RI PT
284
In the right pleurocoel of CPPLIP 0115 there are three rounded camerae with
292
well-defined margins (Fig. 5). In contrast, the pleurocoels of CPPLIP 0032, there are
293
two deeper and larger camerae. The preserved elements thus demonstrate that, in this
294
juvenile titanosaur, axial skeletal pneumaticity extended to the thoracic region and did
295
not have a homogeneous distribution. CPPLIP 0115 is an anterior dorsal centrum with
296
camerae that are smaller and shallower than those of the more posterior centrum
297
CPPLIP 0032. In this respect, CPPLIP 0032 and CPPLIP 0115 differ conspicuously
298
from dorsal vertebrae of adult specimens of Uberabatitan (e.g., CPPLIP 1077), which
299
have only a single deep camera with well-defined margins. The juvenile vertebrae also
300
differ from dorsal vertebrae of Trigonosaurus (CPPLIP 0361), which have a deep
301
camera that lacks defined margins.
TE D
EP
AC C
302
M AN U
291
The new material also differs from dorsal vertebrae of Gondwanatitan faustoi
303
Kellner and Azevedo, 1999 with respect to the morphology of its pleurocoels, which in
304
the latter are located on the Uppermost portions of the centra, immediately ventral to the
305
neural arch, and are deep and elongated with poorly defined camerae. Similarly, the
306
Early Cretaceous titanosaur Tapuiasaurus macedoi Zaher, Pol, Carvalho, Nascimento,
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 307
Riccomini, Larson, Juárez Valieri, Silva, and Campos, 2011 has proportionally larger
308
pleurocoels with poorly defined camerae (Zaher et al., 2011). The caudal centrum of the juvenile specimen does not show any pneumaticity,
310
differing from some Saltasaurinae taxa (Cerda et al., 2012) and other sauropods (Wedel
311
and Taylor, 2013).
RI PT
309
312 313
316 317
Fig. 5. Photograph (left) and interpretive drawing (right) of dorsal centrum CPPLIP 0115 in right lateral view, showing three camerae within the pleurocoel. This stage of development corresponds to morphological ontogenetic stage 3 proposed by Carballido and Sander (2014).
SC
315
Figure 5 here. 1.5 column
M AN U
314
318 319
6. Discussion
320
The dorsal centra reported herein (CPPLIP 0032 and CPPLIP 0115) differ from
322
those of other juvenile titanosaurs, such as the juvenile skeleton of Rapetosaurus (Curry
323
Rogers, 2009), in which the dorsoventral diameter of the centrum is greater than its
324
width and the posterior articular cotyle is deeper. The new centra are nearly as wide as
325
tall, and their cotyles are not as deep as in Rapetosaurus. The same applies to dorsal
326
centra of juvenile individuals of the Jurassic macronarian Europasaurus (Carballido and
327
Sander, 2014), which have more strongly concave ventral faces and posterior cotyles
328
that are larger than their respective anterior condyles. Similarly, in a juvenile dorsal
329
centrum of Phuwiangosaurus sirindhornae Martin, Buffetaut, and Suteethorn, 1994, the
330
ventral face is also more concave, and the pleurocoel is located more posteriorly than in
331
the new Serra da Galga specimen (Martin, 1994).
AC C
EP
TE D
321
332
Despite their generally poor preservation, it is notable that the caudal centra of
333
the new specimen have less concave ventral surfaces than in those of caudals of the
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 334
three titanosaurian genera previously described from the same region: Baurutitan,
335
Trigonosaurus, and Uberabatitan. Nevertheless, with its slightly concave ventral face
336
and a posterior condyle that is slightly larger than the anterior cotyle, CPPLIP 0031 is
337
more similar to the most anterior preserved caudal of Rapetosaurus. Even though the juvenile elements described herein collectively preserve few
339
diagnostic features, the strongly procoelous condition of the anterior caudal centrum is a
340
character of Titanosauria (Filippi et al., 2011; D’emic, 2012), and allow us to include
341
CPPLIP 0031 (and all of the elements presuming they belong to the same individual) in
342
this clade.
SC
RI PT
338
Wilson (2002) proposed the character “anterior and middle caudal vertebrae
344
procoelous” as a synapomorphy of the clade Lithostrotia (Upchurch, Barrett, and
345
Dodson, 2004). However, this character appears several times outside Lithostrotia, such
346
as Dreadnought schrani Lacovara et al., 2014, Mendozasaurus neguyelap González
347
Riga, 2003 and Malawisaurus dixeyi Jacobs et al., 1993. Even in some lithostrotian
348
titanosaurian species the procoelous condition of the anterior caudal centra are variable:
349
Rincosaurus caudimirus Calvo and González Riga, 2003 has procoelous anterior
350
caudals followed by a series of amphicoelous, opisthocoelous and biconvex centra, and
351
Baurutitan has the first caudal biconvex - acondition that may also be present on
352
Neuquensaurus (D’emic and Wilson, 2010).
TE D
EP
AC C
353
M AN U
343
Most, if not all, Brazilian Late Cretaceous titanosaur taxa such as Baurutitan
354
(Santucci and Arruda-Campos, 2011), Trigonosaurus (Mannion and Otero, 2012; Juárez
355
Valieri and Ríos Díaz, 2013), and Uberabatitan are also considered to be members of
356
Lithostrotia. Based on the geological and geographical context, we also suggest that the
357
Peirópolis specimen has affinities with Lithostrotia. CPPLIP 0086 and 0114 possesses a
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 358
dorsoventrally compressed centrum, a characteristic of Saltasaurinae (Powell, 2003) and
359
may be related with this clade. The presence of pneumatic camerae in the dorsal centra indicates that the
361
specimen was not extremely immature at death; rather, it corresponds to the
362
morphological ontogenetic stage (MOS) 3 of Carballido and Sander (2014) (which was
363
proposed by these authors based on their study of the ontogeny of Europasaurus). In a
364
recent study, Melstrom et al. (2016) supported the hypothesis that, in neosauropods,
365
vertebral pneumaticity developed early in ontogeny, first in the cervical series and later
366
extending to other vertebrae.
SC
RI PT
360
The Serra da Galga specimen pertains to MOS 3; furthermore, based on the
368
presence of pneumatic camerae in its dorsal centra, it probably already possessed air sac
369
diverticula in the thoracic region. Therefore, the titanosaurian respiratory system was
370
probably completely developed at an early ontogenetic stage and a correspondingly
371
small body size. This supports the hypothesis of “ontogenetic canalization” in
372
titanosaurs proposed by Curry Rogers et al. (2016), who demonstrated via studies of the
373
juvenile Rapetosaurus that osteologically immature titanosaurs were nearly identical in
374
morphology to adults except for their size.
EP
TE D
M AN U
367
The dorsal centra CPPLIP 0032 and CPPLIP 0115 bear pneumatic fossae that
376
differ in morphology from those of other titanosaurian taxa found in the same region,
377
such as Trigonosaurus and Uberabatitan. This suggests that the new juvenile specimen
378
may belong to a different lithostrotian species, and that the pleurocoels may become
379
progressively smaller but not change in overall shape. During growth the vertebral
380
pneumaticity of sauropod individual becomes better developed due to the expansion of
381
either the cervical or abdominal air sac diverticulae (Wedel, 2003b; Salgado et al.,
382
2006); a change hypothesized to reduce the weight of the skeleton and/or increase
AC C
375
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 383
oxygen consumption in response to the elevated metabolic demands brought about by
384
large body size. Finally, some workers have argued that sauropods show signs of gregarious
386
behavior (Salgado et al., 2012). With respect to titanosaurs, it has been suggested that if
387
this behavior was not present, females at least would have aggregated periodically
388
during the ovipositional season (Chiappe et al., 2005, García et al., 2015). Price (1951)
389
reported sauropods eggs within the Marília Formation, and although no juveniles have
390
been found associated with these eggs, the synformational presence of both eggs and
391
juveniles with adult titanosaurs suggests that animals of different ontogenetic stages
392
shared a common environment.
394
7. Conclusions
395
M AN U
393
SC
RI PT
385
In conclusion, although fragmentary, the juvenile titanosaurian specimen
397
described herein to lends further support to hypotheses of isometric growth in
398
titanosaurs, and may also represent a species distinct from those that have already been
399
found in the Uberaba region. Furthermore, the presence of titanosaur eggs and
400
individuals of different ontogenetic stages in the area bolsters the idea that the local
401
paleoenvironment was conducive to both titanosaurian nesting as well as supporting a
402
taxonomically diverse sauropod fauna.
404
EP
AC C
403
TE D
396
Acknowledgments
405 406
We thank the continuous support of all the staff of the Complexo Cultural e
407
Cientifico de Peirópolis of the Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro, Uberaba,
408
Minas Gerais. This research was beneficiated by the financial support of the the
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 409
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) and
410
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG). We also thank Matthew
411
C. Lamanna, Blair W. McPhee and both anonymous reviewers for comments that
412
greatly improved the strength of this contribution.
414
RI PT
413
References
415
417
Apesteguía, S. 2004. Bonitasaura salgadoi gen. et sp. nov.: a beaked sauropod from the Late Cretaceous of Patagonia. Naturwissenschaften, 91(10), 493-497.
SC
416
Batezelli, A. 2015. Continental systems tracts of the Brazilian Cretaceous Bauru Basin
419
and their relationship with the tectonic and climatic evolution of South America.
420
Basin Research. 1–25, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bre.12128
M AN U
418
Behrensmeyer, A. K., Western, D., and Boaz, D. E. D. 1979. New perspectives in
422
vertebrate paleoecology from a recent bone assemblage. Paleobiology, 5(1), 12-21.
423
Behrensmeyer, A. K. 1975. The taphonomy and paleoecology of Plio-Pleistocene
424
vertebrate assemblages East of Lake Rudolph, Kenya. Bull. Mus. Compar. Zool.,
425
Harvard Univ, v. 146, p. 473-578.
TE D
421
Bertini, R. J., Marshall, L. G., Gayet, M., and Brito, P. 1993. Vertebrate faunas from the
427
Adamantina and Marília formations (Upper Bauru Group, Late Cretaceous, Brazil) in
428
their stratigraphic and paleobiogeographic context. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und
429
Paläontologie, Abhandlungen, 188(1), 71-101.
431
AC C
430
EP
426
Bittencourt, J. S. and Langer, M.C. 2011. Mesozoic dinosaurs from Brazil and their biogeographic implications. Anais Acad. Bras. Ciênc., 73: 23-60.
432
Bonaparte, J. F., and Coria, R. A. 1993. Un nuevo y gigantesco saurópodo titanosaurio
433
de la Formación Río Limay (Albiano-Cenomaniano) de la Provincia del Neuquén,
434
Argentina. Ameghiniana, 30(3), 271-282.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 435
Bonaparte, J. F., and Powell, J. E. 1980. A continental assemblage of tetrapods from the
436
Upper Cretaceous beds of El Brete, northwestern Argentina (Sauropoda-
437
Coelurosauria-Carnosauria-Aves). Britt, B. B., and Naylor, B. G. 1994. An embryonic Camarasaurus (Dinosauria,
439
Sauropoda) from the Upper Jurassic Morrison Formation (Dry Mesa Quarry,
440
Colorado). pp. 256–264 in K. Carpenter, K. F. Hirsch, and J. R. Horner (eds.),
441
Dinosaur Eggs and Babies. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
RI PT
438
Calvo, J. O., and González Riga, B. J. (2003). Rinconsaurus caudamirus gen. et sp.
443
nov., a new titanosaurid (Dinosauria, Sauropoda) from the Late Cretaceous of
444
Patagonia, Argentina. Revista geológica de Chile, 30(2), 333-353.
M AN U
SC
442
Candeiro, C. R. A., Fanti, F., Therrien, F. and Lamanna, M.C. 2011. Continental fossil
446
vertebrates from the mid-Cretaceous (Albian–Cenomanian) Alcântara Formation,
447
Brazil, and their relationship with contemporaneous faunas from North Africa.
448
Journal of African Earth Sciences 60:79-92.
TE D
445
Campos, D. A., Kellner, A. W. A., Bertini, R. J., and Santucci, R. M. 2005. On a
450
titanosaurid (Dinosauria, Sauropoda) vertebral column from the Bauru Group, Late
451
Cretaceous of Brazil. Arquivos do Museu Nacional, 63(3), 565-593.
EP
449
Carballido, J.L., Marpmann, J.S., Schwarz Wings, D. and Pabst, B., 2012. New
453
information on a juvenile sauropod specimen from the Morrison Formation and the
454
reassessment of its systematic position. Palaeontology 55(3):567-582.
AC C
452
455
Carballido, J. L., and Sander, P. M. 2014. Postcranial axial skeleton of Europasaurus
456
holgeri (Dinosauria, Sauropoda) from the Upper Jurassic of Germany: implications
457
for sauropod ontogeny and phylogenetic relationships of basal Macronaria. Journal
458
of Systematic Palaeontology, 12(3), 335-387.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 459
Carpenter, K., and McIntosh, J. S. 1994. Upper Jurassic sauropod babies from the
460
Morrison Formation. pp. 265–278 in K. Carpenter, K. F. Hirsch, and J. R. Horner
461
(eds.), Dinosaur Eggs and Babies. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Cerda, I. A., Salgado, L., and Powell, J. E. 2012. Extreme postcranial pneumaticity in
463
sauropod dinosaurs from South America. Paläontologische Zeitschrift, 86(4), 441-
464
449.
RI PT
462
Chiappe, L. M., Jackson, F., Coria, R. A., and Dingus, L. 2005. Nesting titanosaurs
466
from Auca Mahuevo and adjacent sites. The sauropods. University of California
467
Press, Berkeley, 285-302.
SC
465
Coria, R. A., Filippi, L. S., Chiappe, L. M., García, R., and Arcucci, A. B. 2013.
469
Overosaurus paradasorum gen. et sp. nov., a new sauropod dinosaur (Titanosauria:
470
Lithostrotia) from the Late Cretaceous of Neuquén, Patagonia, Argentina. Zootaxa,
471
3683(4), 357-376.
M AN U
468
Curry Rogers, K. 2009. The postcranial osteology of Rapetosaurus krausei (Sauropoda:
473
Titanosauria) from the Late Cretaceous of Madagascar. Journal of Vertebrate
474
Paleontology, 29(4), 1046-1086.
477 478 479 480
EP
476
Curry Rogers, K., and Forster, C. A. 2001. The last of the dinosaur titans: a new sauropod from Madagascar. Nature, v. 412, n. 6846, p. 530-534. Curry Rogers, K., Whitney, M., D’Emic, M., and Bagley, B. 2016. Precocity in a tiny
AC C
475
TE D
472
titanosaur from the Cretaceous of Madagascar. Science, 352(6284), 450-453. D’Emic, M. D. 2012. The early evolution of titanosauriform sauropod dinosaurs. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 166, 624–671.
481
D’emic, M. D., and Wilson, J. A. 2011. New remains attributable to the holotype of the
482
sauropod dinosaur Neuquensaurus australis, with implications for saltasaurine
483
systematics. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, 56(1), 61-73.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 484
Dias-Brito, D., Musacchio, E. A., de Castro, J. C., Maranhão, M. S. A. S., Suárez, J. M.,
485
and Rodrigues, R. 2001. Grupo Bauru: uma unidade continental do Cretáceo no
486
Brasil – concepções baseadas em dados micropaleontológicos, isotópicos e
487
estratigráficos. Revue de Paléobiologie, 20(1), 245-304.
491 492 493 494 495
RI PT
490
MG), escala 1: 1.000.000. Boletim Paranaense de Geociências, v. 55, 53-66.
Fernandes, L. A., and Coimbra, A. M. 1996. A Bacia Bauru (Cretáceo Superior, Brasil). Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, 68(2), 195-206.
SC
489
Fernandes, L. A. 2004. Mapa litoestratigráfico da parte oriental da Bacia Bauru (PR, SP,
Fernandes, L. A., and Coimbra, A. M. 1998. Estratigrafia e evolução geológica da Bacia Bauru (KS, Brasil). In Congresso Brasileiro de Geologia v. 40, p. 101.
M AN U
488
Fernandes, L. A., and Coimbra, A. M. 2008. Revisão estratigráfica da parte oriental da Bacia Bauru (Neocretáceo). Brazilian Journal of Geology, 30(4), 717-728. Filippi, L. S., Canudo, J. I., Salgado, J. L., Garrido, A., García, R., Cerda, I. A., and
497
Otero, A. 2011. A new sauropod titanosaur from the Plottier Formation (Upper
498
Cretaceous) of Patagonia (Argentina). Geologica Acta, 9(1), 1-12.
TE D
496
Foster, J. R. 2005. New juvenile sauropod material from western Colorado, and the
500
record of juvenile sauropods from the Upper Jurassic Morrison Formation; pp. 141–
501
153 in V. Tidwell, and K. Carpenter (eds.), Thunder-Lizards: The Sauropodomorph
502
Dinosaurs. Indiana University Press, Bloomington.
AC C
EP
499
503
Garcia, A. J. V., Da Rosa, A. A. S., and Goldberg, K. 1999. Paleoenvironmental and
504
palaeoclimatic controls on early diagenetic processes and fossil records in
505
continental Cretaceous sandstones in Brazil: a petrologic approach. Simpósio sobre o
506
Cretáceo do Brasil, 5(1999), 491-495.
507
García, R. A., Salgado, L., Fernández, M. S., Cerda, I. A., Carabajal, A. P., Otero, A.,
508
Coria, A. R. and Fiorelli, L. E. 2015. Paleobiology of titanosaurs: reproduction,
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 509
development, histology, pneumaticity, locomotion and neuroanatomy from the South
510
American fossil record. Ameghiniana, 52(1), 29-68. Ghilardi, A. M., Aureliano, T., Duque, R. R., Fernandes, M. A., Barreto, A. M. and
512
Chinsamy, A. 2016. A new titanosaur from the Lower Cretaceous of Brazil.
513
Cretaceous Research 67:16-24.
514 515
RI PT
511
Gilmore, C. W. 1922. A new sauropod dinosaur from the Ojo Alamo Formation of New Mexico. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 72(14), 1–9.
González Riga, B. J. 2003. A new titanosaur (Dinosauria, Sauropoda) from the Upper
517
Cretaceous of Mendoza province, Argentina. Ameghiniana, v. 40, n. 2, p. 155-172.
518
Juárez Valieri, R. D., and Ríos Díaz, S. D. 2013. Assignation of the vertebra CPP 494 to
519
Trigonosaurus pricei Campos et al., 2005 (Sauropoda: Titanosauriformes) from the
520
Late Cretaceous of Brazil, with comments on the laminar variation among
521
lithostrotian titanosaurs. Boletín del Museo Nacional de Historia Natural del
522
Paraguay, 17(1), 20-28.
TE D
M AN U
SC
516
Jacobs, L., Winkler, D. A., Downs, W. R., and Gomani, E. M. 1993. New material of an
524
Early Cretaceous titanosaurid saurepod dinosaur from Malawi. Palaeontology, 36,
525
523-523.
EP
523
Kellner, A. W. A., and Azevedo, S. A. 1999. A new sauropod dinosaur (Titanosauria)
527
from the Late Cretaceous of Brazil. National Science Museum Monographs, 15, 111-
528
142.
AC C
526
529
Kellner, A. W. A., Campos, D. A., and Trotta, M. N. 2005. Description of a titanosaurid
530
caudal series from the Bauru Group, Late Cretaceous of Brazil. Arquivos do Museu
531
Nacional, 63(3), 529-564.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Lacovara, K. J., Lamanna, M. C., Ibiricu, L. M., Poole, J. C., Schroeter, E. R., Ullmann,
533
P. V., ... and Egerton, V. M. 2014. A gigantic, exceptionally complete titanosaurian
534
sauropod dinosaur from southern Patagonia, Argentina. Scientific Reports, 4, 6196.
535
Lehman, T. M., and Coulson, A. B. 2002. A juvenile specimen of the sauropod dinosaur
536
Alamosaurus sanjuanensis from the Upper Cretaceous of Big Bend National Park,
537
Texas. Journal of Paleontology, 76(1), 156-172.
RI PT
532
Lydekker, R. (1893). The dinosaurs of Patagonia. Anales del Museo de la Plata, 2, 1-14.
539
Mannion, P. D., and Otero, A. 2012. A reappraisal of the Late Cretaceous Argentinean
540
sauropod dinosaur Argyrosaurus superbus, with a description of a new titanosaur
541
genus. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 32(3), 614-638.
544 545 546 547
M AN U
543
Marsh, O. C. 1878. Principal characters of American Jurassic dinosaurs. American Journal of Science, (95), 411-416.
Marsh, O. C. 1890. Description of new dinosaurian reptiles. American Journal of Science, n. 229, p. 81-86.
TE D
542
SC
538
Martin, V. 1994. Baby sauropods from the Sao Khua Formation (Lower Cretaceous) in northeastern Thailand. Gaia, 10, 147-153. Martinelli, A., and Forasiepi, A. 2004. Late Cretaceous vertebrates from Bajo de Santa
549
Rosa (Allen Formation), Río Negro Province, Argentina, with the description of a
550
new sauropod dinosaur (Titanosauridae). Revista del Museo Argentino de Ciencias
551
Naturales Nueva Serie, 6(2), 257-305.
AC C
EP
548
552
Martinelli, A. G., and Teixeira, V. P. A. 2015. The Late Cretaceous vertebrate record
553
from the Bauru Group in the Triângulo Mineiro, southeastern Brazil. Boletín
554
Geológico y Minero, 126(1), 129-158.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 555
Melstrom, K. M., D’Emic, M. D., Chure, D., and Wilson, J. A. 2016. A juvenile
556
sauropod dinosaur from the Late Jurassic of Utah, USA, presents further evidence of
557
an avian style air-sac system. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, e1111898. Menegazzo, M. C.; Catuneanu, O.; Chang, H. K. The South American retroarc foreland
559
system: The development of the Bauru Basin in the back-bulge province. Marine and
560
Petroleum Geology, v. 73, p. 131-156, 2016.
564 565 566 567 568
SC
563
Indiana, pp. 1-536.
Paula e Silva, F. 2003. Geologia de subsuperfície e hidroestratigrafia do Grupo Bauru no Estado de São Paulo. Rio Claro.
M AN U
562
Novas, F.E. 2009. The Age of Dinosaurs in South America. Indiana University Press
Peterson, O. A. and Gilmore, C.W. 1902. Elosaurus parvus: a new genus and species of the Sauropoda. Annals of Carnegie Museum 1:490-499.
Price, L. I. 1951. Ovo de dinossauro na formação Bauru, do estado de Minas Gerais. Notas Preliminares da Divisão de Geologia de Mineralogia, 53, 1-7.
TE D
561
RI PT
558
Ribeiro, L. C. B., and Carvalho, I. S. 2007. Sítio Peirópolis e Serra da Galga, Uberaba,
570
MG–Terra dos Dinossauros do Brasil. Sítios Geológicos e Paleontológicos do Brasil,
571
1, 389-402.
EP
569
Salgado, L., Apesteguía, S., and Heredia, S. E. 2005. A new specimen of
573
Neuquensaurus australis, a Late Cretaceous saltasaurine titanosaur from north
574
Patagonia. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 25(3), 623-634.
AC C
572
575
Salgado, L., Canudo, J. I., Garrido, A. C., and Carballido, J. L. 2012. Evidence of
576
gregariousness in rebbachisaurids (Dinosauria, Sauropoda, Diplodocoidea) from the
577
Early Cretaceous of Neuquén (Rayoso Formation), Patagonia, Argentina. Journal of
578
Vertebrate Paleontology, 32(3), 603-613.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 579 580
Salgado, L., Coria, R. A. and Calvo, J. O. 1997. Evolution of Titanosaurid Sauropods. I: Phylogenetic analysis based on the postcraneal evidence. Ameghiniana 34: 3-32. Salgado, L., García, R., and Daza, J. 2006. Consideraciones sobre las láminas neurales
582
de los dinosaurios saurópodos y su significado morfofuncional. Revista del Museo
583
Argentino de Ciencias Naturales nueva serie, 8(1), 69-79.
RI PT
581
Salgado, L., and de Souza Carvalho, I. 2008. Uberabatitan ribeiroi, a new titanosaur
585
from the Marília Formation (Bauru Group, Upper Cretaceous), Minas Gerais, Brazil.
586
Palaeontology, 51(4), 881-901.
SC
584
Sander, P. M., Mateus, O., Laven, T., and Knötschke, N. 2006. Bone histology indicates
588
insular dwarfism in a new Late Jurassic sauropod dinosaur. Nature, 441(7094), 739-
589
741.
M AN U
587
Santucci, R. M., and Bertini, R. J. 2001. Distribuição paleogeográfica e biocronológica
591
dos titanossauros (Saurischia, Sauropoda) do Grupo Bauru, Cretáceo Superior do
592
sudeste brasileiro. Revista Brasileira de Geociências, 31(3), 307-314.
TE D
590
Schwarz, D., Ikejiri, T., Breithaupt, B. H., Sander, P. M., and Klein, N. 2007. A nearly
594
complete skeleton of an early juvenile diplodocid (Dinosauria: Sauropoda) from the
595
lower Morrison Formation (Late Jurassic) of north central Wyoming and its
596
implications for early ontogeny and pneumaticity in sauropods. Historical Biology,
597
19(3), 225-253.
AC C
EP
593
598
Soares, P. C., Landim, P. M. B., Fulfaro, V. J., and Neto, A. S. 1980. Ensaio de
599
caracterização estratigráfica do Cretáceo no estado de São Paulo: Grupo Bauru.
600
Brazilian Journal of Geology, 10(3), 177-185.
601
Tschopp, E., Mateus, O. and Benson, R.B., 2015. A specimen-level phylogenetic
602
analysis and taxonomic revision of Diplodocidae (Dinosauria, Sauropoda). PeerJ
603
3:e857
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 604
Upchurch, P., Barrett, P. M., and Dodson, P. 2004. Sauropoda, pp. 259–324 in
605
Weishampel, D. B., Dodson, P., and Osmólska, H. The Dinosauria (Second Edition).
606
University of California Press, Berkeley. Voorhies, M. R. 1969. Taphonomy and population dynamics of an early Pliocene
608
vertebrate fauna, Knox County, Nebraska. Rocky Mountain Geology, 8 (special
609
paper 1), 1-69.
614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625
SC
dinosaurs. Paleobiology, 29(2), 243-255.
M AN U
613
Wedel, M. J. 2003b. Vertebral pneumaticity, air sacs, and the physiology of sauropod
Wedel, M. J., and Taylor, M. P. 2013. Caudal pneumaticity and pneumatic hiatuses in the sauropod dinosaurs Giraffatitan and Apatosaurus. PLoS One, 8(10), e78213. Wilson, J. A. 1999. A nomenclature for vertebral laminae in sauropods and other saurischian dinosaurs. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 19(4), 639-653.
TE D
612
Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 23(2), 344-357.
Wilson JA. 2002. Sauropod dinosaur phylogeny: critique and cladistic analysis. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 136: 217–276. Wilson, J. A. 2006a. An overview of titanosaur evolution and phylogeny. Actas de las
EP
611
Wedel, M. J. 2003a. The evolution of vertebral pneumaticity in sauropod dinosaurs.
III Jornadas sobre Dinosaurios y su Entorno. Burgos: Salas de los Infantes, 169-190. Wilson, J. A. (2006b). Anatomical nomenclature of fossil vertebrates: standardized
AC C
610
RI PT
607
terms or ‘lingua franca’?. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 26(3), 511-518. Wilson, J. A., and Sereno, P. C. 1998. Early evolution and higher-level phylogeny of sauropod dinosaurs. Society of Vertebrate Paleontology Memoir, 18(S2), 1-79.
626
Zaher, H., Pol, D., Carvalho, A. B., Nascimento, P. M., Riccomini, C., Larson, P.,
627
Juárez Valieri, R., Silva, N. J., and Campos, D. A. 2011. A complete skull of an
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Early Cretaceous sauropod and the evolution of advanced titanosaurians. PLoS ONE,
629
6(2), e16663.
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
628
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT