Arch. Gerontol. 0167-4943/98/$19.00 DESIGNING
P.
Geriatr. suppl. 6 (1998) 515-518 Q 1998 Elsevier Science Ireland FOR
VALLA
OLDER
and
Architecture ontechnology, versity of
T.
PEOPLE
WITH
Ltd. All right
COGNITIVE
reserved
AND
515
AFFECTIVE
DISORDERS
HARRINGTONa
Studio, Centre Eindhoven,
Via Termopili 25, I-20127 Milano, Italy; alnstitute for for Biomedical and Healthcare Technology, Technical Box 513, 5600MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands
CerUni-
SUMMARY Knowledge of the design criteria for specific physical environments for elderly people with dementia, together with medical and pharmacological research studies is a very important scientific target with therapeutical implications for cognitive and affective disorders. Safety, comfort and utility are major concerns for the elderly, especially those who have developed perceptual or other mental deficits. Yet designing environments that are safe and respectful of them is a very complicated task. Here we approach that task simultaneously from two distinctly separate vantage points. The first is from the laboratory, involving the psychophysics of human performance, namely, the parameters of the senses, vision, touch and of cognitive and motor performance which can be used to predict accidents in specific settings. The second one is the accident reconstruction: after accidents occur, they are analyzed to find out which aspects of the person interacted with which aspects of the environment to cause the trip or fall or crash. Data from both of these sources can be used to elevate the standards of safety. Research on visual perception, motor activity, orientation and other relevant human functions often cannot be generalized to the field from the psychophysical laboratory. It is often necessary to perform the relevant experimentation in the field where the research setting is more representative of the lives of the patients and the dangers to them. It is necessary to develop standardized research settings such as the Alzheimer’s garden. Such settings should, first, be mathematically modeled along the dimensions of interest in concert with the collection of data which can be used to test, validate and extend the model and thus the utility of the setting. Separate sub-models can eventually be combined into larger models. Keywords: architectural care facilities, Alzheimer
design, garden.
Alzheimer’s wandering,
disease, visual
therapeutical perception,
environment, simulation
INTRODUCTION In of
Italy,
to
is
the
Italy
that
Geriatric
care
setting
is
teraction refined
in
60 % of
staff
and
The
the for typical
falling,
There
is
surroundings:
Western
countries,
houses
and
Alzheimer patients’
often
inadequate:
guidelines
wandering,
other
sheltered
between
dementia.
one’s
as
admission
families
and
the suitable more
temporal
relationship for
the
lives all
at
agree
that
the
up
for
by
and
disorientation.
spatial
negative
architecture patients
causes
situation by
in
relatives. physical
by
stressed
in-
Designers
thus
need
people
with
elderly
environments
and this
main
institutional
stirred
facilities
the
assisted
environment.
care
of
present
influenced
between Alzheimer
The home
are
physical
behaviors
is one
homes.
problems
designing
escaping,
a close
patients
behavioral
patient
dementia
nursing
the
relationship
are:
perception gradually
of
516 changes.
Vision
Harrington. sensorial
THE
and
assessed
PLAN
OF
homes
long
term
Units
in
suggestions
REGION
on
of
how
for
to design
Quon,
1989:
to make
deficits
Region
units
up
for
scientifically.
Lombardy
for
only
represented
and
and
restructured
these
the
care
Alzheimer”)
Canada
be
LOMBARDY
Plan”
facilities
USA,
(Harrington
can
analyzing
residential
residential the
by
“Alzheimer (“Nuclei
simulation
environment
deficits
extra-hospital
nursing
by
physical
perceptual
so-called
about
be
The
ALZHEIMER The
96
can
1997)
the
demented
first
elders,
Europe.
The
a specific
care
for
15-20 local
unit
to
the
Plan
with
years
public
similar
Alzheimer
the
residents
the
proposal
of
Special
gives
green
1994-
amid
Care
many
outdoor
useful
spaces
in-
tegrated. An of
and
the
creation
from to
important
patients
allow
lost.
the
This
the
la,
green
with
of
of
Eden”,
Italian
control.
to create
to
his/her Sector
the
move the
District
the
of
quality
medical
of
staff,
facilities any
Milan
for
life
comes
and
danger
accepted
people
planned
of
of
getting
Garden”
challenge
dementia.
as
Planning
“Alzheimer
the
with
Antonini
Department the
care
without
a garden
model:
the
the
wander.
Francesco
Therefore,
of the
around to
i.e.,
improves
tasks with
need
geriatrician
a theoretical
which
also
integrated
patients
Services
the
eases
areas
satisfy
“Garden by
freedom
to
contribution and
Alzheimer
Social
initiated
asked
of
helps
The create
therapeutical relatives,
a
to
It
place
was
allowing
of
Architecture
[AC)
(Mori
was and
Val-
1995). The
wandering
celerate
the
is controlled
process
therapeutical
of
activity
too
functional
often
with
decline,
stimulated
by
sedative
medicines
meanwhile
the
the
environment
which
movement
and
by
may
should
the
acbe
therapeutical
programs. A
specific
affect
the
search
environment,
behavior
on
systems,
indoor
daily
living
and offer
and
orientation
memory and
dignity.
utical
goal,
too,
since
abilities,
and
as tors gical
well. on
As
a matter
patients
well-being
The
with of
of may
patients.
and
order
set
programs of
patients,
of
a suitable
have
disease
studies and
physical
(Bonati
and
reassuring
them
for on the
interaction
the
an
Valla,
support
1997). improve
by
The atten-
increasing
au-
is a thcrape-
cognitive
describe
Retechnical
aids
environment
influences
their
positively
declines.
stimulation,
physical
may
furnishings,
up
sensory
implications
positive
many
needs cognitive
colors,
to
the
have
fact,
patients’
levels
design
may
the
functional materials,
in
therapeutical
Alzheimer
these
the
spaces,
different
it
of
for
down
exhaustive,
should
tonomy
functional
slow outdoor
be
activities
environment tion,
and
, must
etc.
conceived
and
disorders affective
effects
of with
and
disorders sensory the
psycholo-
fac-
a
517 GUIDELINES
FOR
Through dementia
DESIGNING
analysis
(Cohen
1993).
some
guidelines
units.
They
should
tecture”
and
provide
familiar
fic
In
of
the
future,
of
cility.
One
settings
with
can
be
for
direct
as
the
In
model
MATHEMATICAL The
in
in
model
model
will
to
it
the
laboratory
is
both
sophisticated
ma-
necessary
to
followed the
every
fa-
standardized
be appropriate
input
reiterate
but
foregoing mental
in from
facilities)
and
universal,
it
can
(computers
are to need ultimate develop
from
the
AC.
dent
causation,
its to
perform
is
by
reach
a multi-
experimentation.
country
music,
These comfort
the
has
to
find
so
and the
perform
its
understand,
us
on
real
the
reshape
the arrow
subtle
the
safety
scene
bench
of
we
we
want
nicely
it
to fit “looks”
warn
AC, may
a specific
data,
someone
things),
the that
experimental
if
friendly
e.g.,
anything
from on
from
vibrantly
interest,
tell
Based
guiding more
to
of
models.
model”,
the
ac-
to:
dim
the
spe-
confused
the
people
who
forth.
need
not
submodels can
actions
mathematical
“mathematical
scene
ranging else.
of
of
chases,
inhabitants,
resize
to
model small
could
designer
blink
beginning and
one
someone
application
meaning
depict
whatever
coming,
it,
no
the
and
the
who
is the the
can
that
appeal
change
person
to
extension
that
way
esthetic
lights,
The
of
that
about
tualized
appear
be
changed
books
any
know to
the
the
can
completely
dusty
person,
cific
improve
interfaces it
to
design
approach
have
computerized
want
of
the
MODELS
Computers
analyze
process
of
specinight),
facilities.
second
formulae
development
to
care
data as
standards
of
The
prototyping
tame
research
and
and
simple
and
decreased
methods
a setting.
sensory
have
(alcoves),
to
have
situational
psychophysical
such
offer
(day
value
who
design
(creation
evaluation
designing
in
archi-
1997).
architectural
the
stage
dimensional Some
work
care
barriers,
time,
lighting
be of
through
the
“hard
should and
spaces
special
people
Day,
of
avoid
they space
(Valla,
older
with
and
environmental
individual
would
the
realized
should
people
Cohen
construction
environment;
furnishings
to
the
in
for
1991;
eliminate
spaces,
Standard
to
models.
should
extensions
be
to
15 patients),
area/path,
special
AC.
application
operating
own
can
reformulated
thematical the
them
(6 -
private
dangers
for
orientation
a wandering
design
Munson,
they
maximize
2 possible
1991:
recommended
a prosthetic
and
environmental
Coon,
size
landmarks,
complicated
such
in
stress,
colors,
of
been
small
places
use
on
1991;
corridors,
spaces,
morass
ply
be
of organization, outdoor
literature
have
without
specific
the
Weisman,
institutional
stimulations plans
of
and
then and
even based
be
well-being
be
attempted
on
experimental
combined later.
to
handle
initially.
It
data, the
full
is
such
possible
sim-
as
come
spectrum
can of
acci-
518 Developing is an
enticing
They
do
tics.
models possibility.
not
need
They
the
elderly.
can
simply
are
used
be with
for
tives,
or these
simple
They
may
incorporate
given
situations
discomfort.
the
full
simulations and
people
may
of to
gather
data
of more
about
the
require
to
look
that
causation a few right
are
test
they
entirely
for but
also and
or
collaborate
the
patients’ in
rela-
their
worlds.
can
be
the
factors
of
accidents,
made. in
disorientation
But do
perform
experimental
to
models
correct
to
models,
hazards
equations.
but
environments
interactions of
first. mathema-
gerontechnology
with
the
model
developed
want
didactic
complex
mathematics and
in
themselves
show
be
of
underlying
complex
scientists
elaborated
types
designing
or
to
computerized
of
bases
students,
to
models
principles
with
to
have
no
who
more
begin
they
can
require
mathematicians
communicating
contribute
models
they
between and
complex
they
only
not
need
to
can
be
evolved
“what-if”
hypotheses,
be
and to
or need
to
right to
Monte
monitor,
at offer Carlo
predict
control. These
dized AC
communication
Gradually,
power
teaching
eventual
movement
that
increasingly
and the
the
beginnings,
correct,
stage.
demonstrate
demented
These
partly
didactic
engineers
used
of
accurate.
form
for
scientists,
can
this
to can
From
be
be very
only
be
a continuum
Simple
to
These
architects, they
along
efforts
in-the-field to
evolve
can research
recursively
be
most
effectively
setting based
on
staged
such the
as data
the which
and AC. are
carried And
so
generated
out we
in can
by
a standarexpect
the
itself.
REFERENCES Bonati, A. and Valla, P. (1997): Material, lights, colors and spaces: a 1st Bologna International Meeting on Cognitive and therapeutical project. Affective Disorders in the Elderly. Book of Abstracts, pp. 190-191. Bologna. Contemporary Environments for People with Cohen, U. and Day, K. (1993): Dementia. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore and London. Cohen, U. and Weisman, C.D. (1991): Holding on to Home. Designing EnvironThe Johns Hopkins University Press, Balments for People with Dementia. timore and London. Coon D.H. (ed.) (1991): Specialized Dementia Care Units. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore. Harrington, T.L. (1997) : Perception and physiological psychology in the elderFirst Bologna International Meeting on Cognititve and Affective ly. Disorders in the Elderely. Book of Abstracts, pp. 12-13. Bologna, Italy. Harrington, T.L. and Quon, D. (1989) : A method of stereoptically simulating manyfolds of threedimensional objects using only a single dipslay pattern. Percept. Motor Skills, 68, 1163-1175. F. and Valla, P. (1995) : The Alzheimer Garden. Theoretical-Technical Mori. Manual for the Planning and Realization of Green Areas for Elderly People with Dementia, Published by the Provincia di Milano, Milan0 (in Italian). Munson, P. (1991): Designing Facilities for People with Dementia, Published by Department of National Health and Welfare, Ottawa, Canada. Valla, P. (1997): Designing for the Alzheimer Patient. In: P. Valla (ed.): Case per Anziani, pp. 30-41. Supplement of the periodical “Module”, Be-Ma Editrice, Milan0 (in Italian).